Expedited Review Request Letter

FCC ID: PY318200411

Cover Letter(s)

Download: PDF
FCCID_4011424

                             Netgear Incorporated
                 350 East Plumeria Drive San Jose California, United States 95134
                              TEL: 408-89-3657 FAX: 408-907-8097


                                              Expedited Review Letter
                                                                                                    Date: 2018-09-04
        To: Federal Communications Commission
            Equipment Authorization Division


        Subject: Expedited Review Approval
        FCC ID: PY318200411
        We, the undersigned, NETGEAR, Inc., declare that the EX7700 is identical to/has the same performance
        and function as previously certified DFS tested and approved RBS20 under FCC ID: PY317400402. The
        differences are listed in the table below:
              FCC ID of previously granted device                                        FCC ID of new application
                     FCC ID: PY317400402                                                   FCC ID: PY318200411
Technology:

                                                                    There are no changes in the technology designs.

Operational bands cover 5.25-5.35G and 5.47-5.725G; IP based; 2x2   The operational bands are identical 5.25-5.35G and 5.47-5.725G; IP
MIMO                                                                based; 2x2 MIMO

The RF chip is: IPQ4019+QCA9886                                     Same RF chip
                                                                    Same driver version: SPF4.0 CSU1
                                                                    Same RF parameters for TX/RX power levels
Bandwidth information and differences:
HT20,HT40, VHT20, VHT40 and VHT80                                   There are no changes in the bandwidth applications.
Differences in DFS functioning, circuitry, software:

The RF module is OFDM, 16-QAM, 64-QAM and CCK, DQPSK, DBPSK,        There are no difference in Hardware PCB.
DFS function circuitry ,256QAM for OFDM in 11ac mode                         Same Chipset and layout, antenna.
                                                                             Same driver version:SPF4.0 CSU1
                                                                             Software supports slave mode. Slave mode does not affect DFS
                                                                              compliance.
Differences between the products:
Modulation is OFDM, 16-QAM, 64-QAM and CCK, DQPSK, DBPSK            Same TX/RX power, same modulation, same receivers, same circuitry
Receivers is OFDM, 16-QAM, 64-QAM and CCK, DQPSK, DBPSK             same layout, same antenna, same driver version. The software for user
                                                                    configurable controls at the OS level is cosmetically different.
Name of test labs for the grants:
Test Lab: Bureau Veritas CPS (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch            Test Lab: Bureau Veritas CPS (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch




        -----------------------------------------------
        David Kay / Director Regulatory Compliance
        Tel: 4088903657
        Fax: 4089078097
        E-Mail: david.kay@netgear.com



Document Created: 2018-09-05 13:46:05
Document Modified: 2018-09-05 13:46:05

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC