Test Report

FCC ID: PRDOPWIRWMU08

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_1301400

FCC TEST REPORT REPORT NO. : RF990519C19 MODEL NO. : GK6 (refer to item 3.1 for more details) RECEIVED : May 19, 2010 TESTED : May 25, 2010 ISSUED : Jun. 01, 2010 APPLICANT : Acrox Technologies Co., Ltd ADDRESS : 8F, No. 437, Rui Guang RD., Nei Hu Dist., Taipei 114, Taiwan, R.O.C. ISSUED BY : Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch LAB ADDRESS : No. 47, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Tsuen, Lin Kou Hsiang, Taipei Hsien 244, Taiwan, R.O.C. TEST LOCATION : No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Tsuen, Kwei Shan Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien 333, Taiwan, R.O.C. This test report consists of 24 pages in total. It may be duplicated completely for legal use with the approval of the applicant. It should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of our laboratory. The client should not use it to claim product endorsement by TAF or any government agencies. The test results in the report only apply to the tested sample. Report No.: RF990519C19 1 Report Format Version 3.0.1

Table of Contents 1. CERTIFICATION ........................................................................................................ 3 2. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ................................................................................ 4 2.1 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY.............................................................................. 4 3. GENERAL INFORMATION......................................................................................... 5 3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT ........................................................................... 5 3.2 DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES............................................................................. 6 3.2.1 CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST ........................................................ 6 3.2.2 TEST MODE APPLICABILITY AND TESTED CHANNEL DETAIL ............................. 7 3.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED STANDARDS ............................................ 8 3.4 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS ....................................................................... 8 4. TEST TYPES AND RESULTS .................................................................................... 9 4.1 RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT .................................................................. 9 4.1.1 LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT................................................ 9 4.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS.............................................................................................. 10 4.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES .............................................................................................. 11 4.1.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD .................................................................... 11 4.1.5 TEST SETUP............................................................................................................ 12 4.1.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS ............................................................................. 12 4.1.7 TEST RESULTS ....................................................................................................... 13 4.2 BAND EDGES MEASUREMENT ............................................................................. 19 4.2.1 LIMITS OF BAND EDGES MEASUREMENT........................................................... 19 4.2.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS.............................................................................................. 19 4.2.3 TEST PROCEDURE................................................................................................. 19 4.2.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD .................................................................... 19 4.2.5 EUT OPERATING CONDITION ............................................................................... 19 4.2.6 TEST RESULTS ....................................................................................................... 20 5. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION............................................... 22 6. INFORMATION ON THE TESTING LABORATORIES ............................................. 23 7. APPENDIX A - MODIFICATIONS RECORDERS FOR ENGINEERING CHANGES TO THE EUT BY THE LAB....................................................................................... 24 Report No.: RF990519C19 2 Report Format Version 3.0.1

1. CERTIFICATION PRODUCT: Wireless Mouse MODEL NO.: GK6 (refer to item 3.1 for more details) BRAND: ACROX APPLICANT: Acrox Technologies Co., Ltd TESTED: May 25, 2010 TEST SAMPLE: ENGINEERING SAMPLE STANDARDS: FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.249) ANSI C63.4-2003 The above equipment (model: GK6) have been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the sample’s EMC characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. PREPARED BY : , DATE : Jun. 01, 2010 Polly Chien / Specialist TECHNICAL ACCEPTANCE : , DATE : Jun. 01, 2010 Responsible for RF Long Chen / Senior Engineer APPROVED BY : , DATE : Jun. 01, 2010 Gary Chang / Assistant Manager Report No.: RF990519C19 3 Report Format Version 3.0.1

2. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS The EUT has been tested according to the following specifications: APPLIED STANDARD: FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.249) STANDARD TEST TYPE RESULT REMARK PARAGRAPH Power supply is 3Vdc from 15.207 Conducted Emission Test NA batteries. Radiated Emission Test Meet the requirement of limit. 15.209 Band Edge Measurement Minimum passing margin is 15.249 Limit: 50dB less than the peak value of PASS -6.7dB at 4880.00MHz & 15.249 (d) fundamental frequency or meet radiated 4960.00MHz. emission limit in section 15.209 2.1 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for tests performed on the EUT as specified in CISPR 16-4-2: MEASUREMENT FREQUENCY UNCERTAINTY 30MHz ~ 200MHz 3.19 dB 200MHz ~1000MHz 3.21 dB Radiated emissions 1GHz ~ 18GHz 2.26 dB 18GHz ~ 40GHz 1.94 dB This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2. Report No.: RF990519C19 4 Report Format Version 3.0.1

3. GENERAL INFORMATION 3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT EUT Wireless Mouse MODEL NO. GK6 (refer to NOTE 1 for more details) FCC ID PRDOPWIRWMU08 POWER SUPPLY 3Vdc (1.5Vdc battery * 2) MODULATION TYPE GFSK DATA RATE 1Mbps OPERATING FREQUENCY 2403MHz ~ 2480MHz NUMBER OF CHANNEL 78 ANTENNA TYPE Printed antenna DATA CABLE NA I/O PORT NA ACCESSORY DEVICES NA NOTE: 1. The following models are electrically identical, different model names are for marketing purpose. BRAND MODEL DIFFERENCE GK1 GK2 GK3 ACROX GK4 for marketing different GK5 GK6 GK7 2. The EUT has transmitter and receiver functions. 3. The above EUT information was declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description, please refer to the manufacturer's specifications or User's Manual. Report No.: RF990519C19 5 Report Format Version 3.0.1

3.2 DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES 78 channels are provided to this EUT. Channel Freq. (MHz) Channel Freq. (MHz) Channel Freq. (MHz) 1 2403 27 2429 53 2455 2 2404 28 2430 54 2456 3 2405 29 2431 55 2457 4 2406 30 2432 56 2458 5 2407 31 2433 57 2459 6 2408 32 2434 58 2460 7 2409 33 2435 59 2461 8 2410 34 2436 60 2462 9 2411 35 2437 61 2463 10 2412 36 2438 62 2464 11 2413 37 2439 63 2465 12 2414 38 2440 64 2466 13 2415 39 2441 65 2467 14 2416 40 2442 66 2468 15 2417 41 2443 67 2469 16 2418 42 2444 68 2470 17 2419 43 2445 69 2471 18 2420 44 2446 70 2472 19 2421 45 2447 71 2473 20 2422 46 2448 72 2474 21 2423 47 2449 73 2475 22 2424 48 2450 74 2476 23 2425 49 2451 75 2477 24 2426 50 2452 76 2478 25 2427 51 2453 77 2479 26 2428 52 2454 78 2480 3.2.1 CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST EUT (Power from batteries) *Test table Report No.: RF990519C19 6 Report Format Version 3.0.1

3.2.2 TEST MODE APPLICABILITY AND TESTED CHANNEL DETAIL EUT APPLICABLE TO CONFIGURE DESCRIPTION MODE RE≥1G RE<1G PLC BM - √ √ NOTE √ - Where PLC: Power Line Conducted Emission RE<1G: Radiated Emission below 1GHz RE≥1G: Radiated Emission above 1GHz BM: Bandedge Measurement NOTE: No need to concern of Conducted Emission due to the EUT is powered by battery. RADIATED EMISSION TEST (ABOVE 1 GHz):  Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. AVAILABLE CHANNEL TESTED CHANNEL MODULATION TYPE 1 to 78 1, 38, 78 GFSK RADIATED EMISSION TEST (BELOW 1 GHz):  Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. AVAILABLE CHANNEL TESTED CHANNEL MODULATION TYPE 1 to 78 1 GFSK BANDEDGE MEASUREMENT:  Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. AVAILABLE CHANNEL TESTED CHANNEL MODULATION TYPE 1 to 78 1, 78 GFSK TEST CONDITION: APPLICABLE TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS INPUT POWER TESTED BY RE≥1G 26deg. C, 66%RH, 1015 hPa 3Vdc Dean Wang RE<1G 26deg. C, 66%RH, 1015 hPa 3Vdc Dean Wang BM 26deg. C, 66%RH, 1015 hPa 3Vdc Dean Wang Report No.: RF990519C19 7 Report Format Version 3.0.1

3.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED STANDARDS The EUT is a RF Product. According to the specifications of the manufacturer, it must comply with the requirements of the following standards: FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.249) ANSI C63.4-2003 All test items have been performed and recorded as per the above standards. NOTE: The EUT is also considered as a kind of computer peripheral, because the connection to computer is necessary for typical use. It has been verified to comply with the requirements of FCC Part 15, Subpart B, Class B (DoC). The test report has been issued separately. 3.4 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS The EUT has been tested as an independent unit. Report No.: RF990519C19 8 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4. TEST TYPES AND RESULTS 4.1 RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT 4.1.1 LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT Emissions radiated outside of the specified bands, shall be according to the general radiated limits in 15.209, 15.249 as following: 15.209 Limit Frequencies Field strength Measurement distance (MHz) (microvolts/meter) (meters) 0.009 ~ 0.490 2400/F(kHz) 300 0.490 ~ 1.705 24000/F(kHz) 30 1.705 ~ 30.0 30 30 30 ~ 88 100 3 88 ~ 216 150 3 216 ~ 960 200 3 Above 960 500 3 15.249 Limit Field Strength of Field Strength of Fundamental Fundamental Harmonics Frequency (millivolts/meter) (microvolts/meter) 902 ~ 928 MHz 50 500 2400 ~ 2483.5 MHz 50 500 5725 ~ 5875 MHz 50 500 24 ~ 24.25 GHz 250 2500 NOTE: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. 2. Emission level (dBuV/m) = 20 log Emission level (uV/m). 3. As shown in 15.35(b), for frequencies above 1000MHz, the field strength limits are based on average detector, however, the peak field strength of any emission shall not exceed the maximum permitted average limits, specified above by more than 20dB under any condition of modulation. Report No.: RF990519C19 9 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS DESCRIPTION & DATE OF DUE DATE OF MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER CALIBRATION CALIBRATION Test Receiver ESI7 838496/016 Dec. 29, 2009 Dec. 28, 2010 ROHDE & SCHWARZ Spectrum Analyzer FSP40 100039 Jan. 11, 2010 Jan. 10, 2011 ROHDE & SCHWARZ BILOG Antenna VULB9168 9168-155 Apr. 28, 2010 Apr. 27, 2011 SCHWARZBECK HORN Antenna BBHA 9120D 9120D-209 Jul. 01, 2009 Jun. 30, 2010 SCHWARZBECK HORN Antenna BBHA 9170 BBHA9170242 Dec. 25, 2009 Dec. 24, 2010 SCHWARZBECK Preamplifier 8449B 3008A01961 Nov. 04, 2009 Nov. 03, 2010 Agilent Preamplifier 8447D 2944A10738 Nov. 04, 2009 Nov. 03, 2010 Agilent RF signal cable SUCOFLEX 104 274041/4 Aug. 28, 2009 Aug. 27, 2010 HUBER+SUHNNER RF signal cable SUCOFLEX 104 283397/4 Aug. 28, 2009 Aug. 27, 2010 HUBER+SUHNNER Software ADT_Radiated_ NA NA NA ADT. V7.6.15.9.2 Antenna Tower MA 4000 010303 NA NA inn-co GmbH Antenna Tower Controller CO2000 019303 NA NA inn-co GmbH Turn Table TT100. TT93021704 NA NA ADT. Turn Table Controller SC100. SC93021704 NA NA ADT. NOTE: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in HwaYa Chamber 4. 3. The horn antenna and HP preamplifier (model: 8449B) are used only for the measurement of emission frequency above 1GHz if tested. 4. The FCC Site Registration No. is 988962. 5. The IC Site Registration No. is IC7450F-4. Report No.: RF990519C19 10 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters above the ground at a 3 meter semi-anechoic chamber. The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. b. The EUT was set 3 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower. c. The antenna is a broadband antenna, and its height is varied from one meter to four meters above the ground to determine the maximum value of the field strength. Both horizontal and vertical polarizations of the antenna are set to make the measurement. d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and then the antenna was tuned to heights from 1 meter to 4 meters and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading. e. The test-receiver system was set to Peak Detect Function and Specified Bandwidth with Maximum Hold Mode. f. If the emission level of the EUT in peak mode was lower than the limit specified, then testing could be stopped and the peak values of the EUT would be reported. Otherwise the emissions would be re-tested one by one using peak, quasi-peak or average method as specified and then reported in a data sheet. NOTE: 1. The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 120kHz for Quasi-peak detection at frequency below 1GHz. 2. The resolution bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 1MHz and video bandwidth is 3MHz for Peak detection at frequency above 1GHz. 3. All modes of operation were investigated and the worst-case emissions are reported. 4.1.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD No deviation. Report No.: RF990519C19 11 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.1.5 TEST SETUP For the actual test configuration, please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). 4.1.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS Set the EUT under transmission condition continuously at specific channel frequency. Report No.: RF990519C19 12 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.1.7 TEST RESULTS ABOVE 1GHz DATA EUT TEST CONDITION MEASUREMENT DETAIL CHANNEL Channel 1 FREQUENCY RANGE 1 ~ 25GHz DETECTOR Peak (PK) INPUT POWER 3Vdc FUNCTION Average (AV) ENVIRONMENTAL 26deg. C, 66%RH TESTED BY Dean Wang CONDITIONS 1015 hPa ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION TABLE CORRECTION LIMIT ANTENNA RAW VALUE NO. FREQ. (MHz) LEVEL MARGIN (dB) ANGLE FACTOR (dBuV/m) HEIGHT (m) (dBuV) (dBuV/m) (Degree) (dB/m) 1 2390.00 44.8 PK 74.0 -29.2 1.10 H 219 11.30 33.50 2 2390.00 33.7 AV 54.0 -20.3 1.10 H 219 0.20 33.50 3 2398.00 47.6 PK 74.0 -26.4 1.10 H 219 14.10 33.50 4 2398.00 38.1 AV 54.0 -15.9 1.10 H 219 4.60 33.50 5 2400.00 62.7 PK 74.0 -11.3 1.10 H 219 29.20 33.50 6 2400.00 11.6 AV 54.0 -42.4 1.10 H 219 -21.90 33.50 7 *2403.00 100.7 PK 114.0 -13.3 1.10 H 219 67.20 33.50 8 *2403.00 49.6 AV 94.0 -44.4 1.10 H 219 16.10 33.50 9 4806.00 66.1 PK 74.0 -7.9 1.05 H 184 26.10 40.00 10 4806.00 15.0 AV 54.0 -39.0 1.05 H 184 -25.00 40.00 REMARKS: 1. Emission level (dBuV/m) = Raw Value (dBuV) + Correction Factor (dB/m). 2. Correction Factor (dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB). 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value. 5. “ * “ : Fundamental frequency 6. The average value of fundamental frequency is: Average = Peak value + 20log(Duty cycle) Where the duty factor is calculated from following formula: 20 log (Duty cycle) = 20 log (0.28 ms / 100 ms) = -51.1 dB Please see page 17 for plotted duty. Report No.: RF990519C19 13 Report Format Version 3.0.1

EUT TEST CONDITION MEASUREMENT DETAIL CHANNEL Channel 1 FREQUENCY RANGE 1 ~ 25GHz DETECTOR Peak (PK) INPUT POWER 3Vdc FUNCTION Average (AV) ENVIRONMENTAL 26deg. C, 66%RH TESTED BY Dean Wang CONDITIONS 1015 hPa ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION TABLE CORRECTION LIMIT ANTENNA RAW VALUE NO. FREQ. (MHz) LEVEL MARGIN (dB) ANGLE FACTOR (dBuV/m) HEIGHT (m) (dBuV) (dBuV/m) (Degree) (dB/m) 1 2390.00 44.3 PK 74.0 -29.7 1.12 V 334 10.80 33.50 2 2390.00 31.8 AV 54.0 -22.2 1.12 V 334 -1.70 33.50 3 2398.00 44.8 PK 74.0 -29.2 1.12 V 334 11.30 33.50 4 2398.00 32.4 AV 54.0 -21.6 1.12 V 334 -1.10 33.50 5 2400.00 52.9 PK 74.0 -21.1 1.12 V 334 19.40 33.50 6 2400.00 1.8 AV 54.0 -52.2 1.12 V 334 -31.70 33.50 7 *2403.00 90.9 PK 114.0 -23.1 1.12 V 334 57.40 33.50 8 *2403.00 39.8 AV 94.0 -54.2 1.12 V 334 6.30 33.50 9 4806.00 61.8 PK 74.0 -12.2 1.09 V 203 21.80 40.00 10 4806.00 10.7 AV 54.0 -43.3 1.09 V 203 -29.30 40.00 REMARKS: 1. Emission level (dBuV/m) = Raw Value (dBuV) + Correction Factor (dB/m). 2. Correction Factor (dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB). 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value. 5. “ * “ : Fundamental frequency 6. The average value of fundamental frequency is: Average = Peak value + 20log(Duty cycle) Where the duty factor is calculated from following formula: 20 log (Duty cycle) = 20 log (0.28 ms / 100 ms) = -51.1 dB Please see page 17 for plotted duty. Report No.: RF990519C19 14 Report Format Version 3.0.1

EUT TEST CONDITION MEASUREMENT DETAIL CHANNEL Channel 38 FREQUENCY RANGE 1 ~ 25GHz DETECTOR Peak (PK) INPUT POWER 3Vdc FUNCTION Average (AV) ENVIRONMENTAL 26deg. C, 66%RH TESTED BY Dean Wang CONDITIONS 1015 hPa ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION TABLE CORRECTION LIMIT ANTENNA RAW VALUE NO. FREQ. (MHz) LEVEL MARGIN (dB) ANGLE FACTOR (dBuV/m) HEIGHT (m) (dBuV) (dBuV/m) (Degree) (dB/m) 1 *2440.00 99.8 PK 114.0 -14.2 1.07 H 217 66.10 33.70 2 *2440.00 48.7 AV 94.0 -45.3 1.07 H 217 15.00 33.70 3 4880.00 67.3 PK 74.0 -6.7 1.04 H 178 27.20 40.10 4 4880.00 16.2 AV 54.0 -37.8 1.04 H 178 -23.90 40.10 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION TABLE CORRECTION LIMIT ANTENNA RAW VALUE NO. FREQ. (MHz) LEVEL MARGIN (dB) ANGLE FACTOR (dBuV/m) HEIGHT (m) (dBuV) (dBuV/m) (Degree) (dB/m) 1 *2440.00 89.8 PK 114.0 -24.2 1.10 V 346 56.10 33.70 2 *2440.00 38.7 AV 94.0 -55.3 1.10 V 346 5.00 33.70 3 4880.00 62.8 PK 74.0 -11.2 1.08 V 197 22.70 40.10 4 4880.00 11.7 AV 54.0 -42.3 1.08 V 197 -28.40 40.10 REMARKS: 1. Emission level (dBuV/m) = Raw Value (dBuV) + Correction Factor (dB/m). 2. Correction Factor (dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB). 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value. 5. “ * “ : Fundamental frequency 6. The average value of fundamental frequency is: Average = Peak value + 20log(Duty cycle) Where the duty factor is calculated from following formula: 20 log (Duty cycle) = 20 log (0.28 ms / 100 ms) = -51.1 dB Please see page 17 for plotted duty. Report No.: RF990519C19 15 Report Format Version 3.0.1

EUT TEST CONDITION MEASUREMENT DETAIL CHANNEL Channel 78 FREQUENCY RANGE 1 ~ 25GHz DETECTOR Peak (PK) INPUT POWER 3Vdc FUNCTION Average (AV) ENVIRONMENTAL 26deg. C, 66%RH TESTED BY Dean Wang CONDITIONS 1015 hPa ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION TABLE CORRECTION LIMIT ANTENNA RAW VALUE NO. FREQ. (MHz) LEVEL MARGIN (dB) ANGLE FACTOR (dBuV/m) HEIGHT (m) (dBuV) (dBuV/m) (Degree) (dB/m) 1 *2480.00 99.1 PK 114.0 -14.9 1.05 H 221 65.30 33.80 2 *2480.00 48.0 AV 94.0 -46.0 1.05 H 221 14.20 33.80 3 2483.50 61.6 PK 74.0 -12.4 1.05 H 221 27.80 33.80 4 2483.50 10.5 AV 54.0 -43.5 1.05 H 221 -23.30 33.80 5 2485.50 46.6 PK 74.0 -27.4 1.05 H 221 12.70 33.90 6 2485.50 39.5 AV 54.0 -14.5 1.05 H 221 5.60 33.90 7 4960.00 67.3 PK 74.0 -6.7 1.02 H 171 27.00 40.30 8 4960.00 16.2 AV 54.0 -37.8 1.02 H 171 -24.10 40.30 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION TABLE CORRECTION LIMIT ANTENNA RAW VALUE NO. FREQ. (MHz) LEVEL MARGIN (dB) ANGLE FACTOR (dBuV/m) HEIGHT (m) (dBuV) (dBuV/m) (Degree) (dB/m) 1 *2480.00 89.2 PK 114.0 -24.8 1.04 V 333 55.40 33.80 2 *2480.00 38.1 AV 94.0 -55.9 1.04 V 333 4.30 33.80 3 2483.50 51.7 PK 74.0 -22.3 1.04 V 333 17.90 33.80 4 2483.50 0.6 AV 54.0 -53.4 1.04 V 333 -33.20 33.80 5 2485.50 44.6 PK 74.0 -29.4 1.04 V 333 10.70 33.90 6 2485.50 32.4 AV 54.0 -21.6 1.04 V 333 -1.50 33.90 7 4960.00 63.2 PK 74.0 -10.8 1.07 V 197 22.90 40.30 8 4960.00 12.1 AV 54.0 -41.9 1.07 V 197 -28.20 40.30 REMARKS: 1. Emission level (dBuV/m) = Raw Value (dBuV) + Correction Factor (dB/m). 2. Correction Factor (dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB). 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value. 5. “ * “ : Fundamental frequency 6. The average value of fundamental frequency is: Average = Peak value + 20log(Duty cycle) Where the duty factor is calculated from following formula: 20 log (Duty cycle) = 20 log (0.28 ms / 100 ms) = -51.1 dB Please see page 17 for plotted duty. Report No.: RF990519C19 16 Report Format Version 3.0.1

20 log (Duty cycle) = 20 log (0.28 ms / 100 ms) = -51.1 dB Report No.: RF990519C19 17 Report Format Version 3.0.1

BELOW 1GHz WORST-CASE DATA EUT TEST CONDITION MEASUREMENT DETAIL CHANNEL Channel 1 FREQUENCY RANGE Below 1000MHz DETECTOR INPUT POWER 3Vdc Quasi-Peak FUNCTION ENVIRONMENTAL 26deg. C, 66%RH TESTED BY Dean Wang CONDITIONS 1015 hPa ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION TABLE CORRECTION LIMIT ANTENNA RAW VALUE NO. FREQ. (MHz) LEVEL MARGIN (dB) ANGLE FACTOR (dBuV/m) HEIGHT (m) (dBuV) (dBuV/m) (Degree) (dB/m) 1 358.48 25.2 QP 46.0 -20.8 1.25 H 229 8.20 17.00 2 844.56 26.9 QP 46.0 -19.1 1.50 H 313 -0.40 27.30 3 873.72 27.5 QP 46.0 -18.5 2.00 H 340 -0.30 27.80 4 897.05 27.6 QP 46.0 -18.4 1.00 H 178 -0.60 28.20 5 916.50 29.0 QP 46.0 -17.0 1.00 H 262 0.60 28.40 6 953.44 29.6 QP 46.0 -16.4 1.00 H 265 0.80 28.80 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION TABLE CORRECTION LIMIT ANTENNA RAW VALUE NO. FREQ. (MHz) LEVEL MARGIN (dB) ANGLE FACTOR (dBuV/m) HEIGHT (m) (dBuV) (dBuV/m) (Degree) (dB/m) 1 757.06 26.1 QP 46.0 -19.9 2.50 V 271 0.50 25.60 2 801.78 26.8 QP 46.0 -19.2 1.25 V 298 0.30 26.50 3 829.00 26.8 QP 46.0 -19.2 1.25 V 31 -0.20 27.00 4 875.67 28.1 QP 46.0 -17.9 1.50 V 313 0.20 27.90 5 895.11 28.0 QP 46.0 -18.0 1.50 V 217 -0.20 28.20 6 945.66 30.6 QP 46.0 -15.4 1.25 V 238 1.90 28.70 REMARKS: 1. Emission level (dBuV/m) = Raw Value (dBuV) + Correction Factor (dB/m). 2. Correction Factor (dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB). 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value. Report No.: RF990519C19 18 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.2 BAND EDGES MEASUREMENT 4.2.1 LIMITS OF BAND EDGES MEASUREMENT Below –50dB of the highest emission level of operating band (in 100kHz Resolution Bandwidth). 4.2.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS DESCRIPTION & DATE OF DUE DATE OF MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER CALIBRATION CALIBRATION R&S SPECTRUM FSP40 100040 Jul. 07, 2009 Jul. 06, 2010 ANALYZER NOTE: The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 4.2.3 TEST PROCEDURE The transmitter output was connected to the spectrum analyzer via a low lose cable. Set both RBW and VBW of spectrum analyzer to 100 kHz and 300 kHz with suitable frequency span including 100 MHz bandwidth from band edge. The band edges was measured and recorded. The spectrum plots are attached on the following pages. 4.2.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD No deviation. 4.2.5 EUT OPERATING CONDITION The software provided by client to enable the EUT under transmission condition continuously at lowest and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF990519C19 19 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.2.6 TEST RESULTS The spectrum plots are attached on the following 4 images. D1 line indicates the highest level, and D2 line indicates the 50dB offset below D1. It shows compliance with the requirement in part 15.249 (d). Report No.: RF990519C19 20 Report Format Version 3.0.1

Report No.: RF990519C19 21 Report Format Version 3.0.1

5. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION Please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). Report No.: RF990519C19 22 Report Format Version 3.0.1

6. INFORMATION ON THE TESTING LABORATORIES We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited and approved according to ISO/IEC 17025. Copies of accreditation certificates of our laboratories obtained from approval agencies can be downloaded from our web site: www.adt.com.tw/index.5/phtml. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following: Linko EMC/RF Lab Hsin Chu EMC/RF Lab Tel: 886-2-26052180 Tel: 886-3-5935343 Fax: 886-2-26051924 Fax: 886-3-5935342 Hwa Ya EMC/RF/Safety/Telecom Lab Tel: 886-3-3183232 Fax: 886-3-3185050 Web Site: www.adt.com.tw The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also. Report No.: RF990519C19 23 Report Format Version 3.0.1

7. APPENDIX A - MODIFICATIONS RECORDERS FOR ENGINEERING CHANGES TO THE EUT BY THE LAB No any modifications are made to the EUT by the lab during the test. --- END --- Report No.: RF990519C19 24 Report Format Version 3.0.1


Document Created: 2010-06-22 16:35:56
Document Modified: 2010-06-22 16:35:56
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC