Test Report_DSS

FCC ID: PPD-AR5B22

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_2456871

PARTIAL FCC TEST REPORT (Bluetooth) REPORT NO.: RF140728C21-2 MODEL NO.: AR5B22 FCC ID: PPD-AR5B22 RECEIVED: Jul. 28, 2014 TESTED: Sep. 01 ~ Sep. 12, 2014 ISSUED: Sep. 12, 2014 APPLICANT: Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. ADDRESS: 1700 Technology Drive, San Jose, CA 95110 ISSUED BY: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch LAB ADDRESS: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Lin Kou Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C. TEST LOCATION: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Tsuen, Kwei Shan Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien 333, Taiwan, R.O.C. This report should not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agencies. This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in this report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute your unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specific mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 1 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

Table of Contents RELEASE CONTROL RECORD .............................................................................................. 4 1. CERTIFICATION........................................................................................................... 5 2. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS .................................................................................. 6 2.1 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ............................................................................... 6 3. GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................... 7 3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT ............................................................................. 7 3.2 DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES ............................................................................... 8 3.2.1 TEST MODE APPLICABILITY AND TESTED CHANNEL DETAIL ............................... 9 3.3 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS ....................................................................... 11 3.3.1 CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST ........................................................ 11 3.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED STANDARDS ............................................ 11 4. TEST TYPES AND RESULTS (BLUETOOTH EDR) .................................................. 12 4.1 RADIATED EMISSION AND BANDEDGE MEASUREMENT..................................... 12 4.1.1 LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION AND BANDEDGE MEASUREMENT .................. 12 4.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS ............................................................................................... 13 4.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES ................................................................................................ 14 4.1.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ...................................................................... 14 4.1.5 TEST SETUP ............................................................................................................. 15 4.1.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 15 4.1.7 TEST RESULTS ......................................................................................................... 16 4.2 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT ............................................................. 18 4.2.1 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT........................................... 18 4.2.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS ............................................................................................... 18 4.2.3 TEST PROCEDURES ................................................................................................ 19 4.2.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ...................................................................... 19 4.2.5 TEST SETUP ............................................................................................................. 20 4.2.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 20 4.2.7 TEST RESULTS ......................................................................................................... 21 5. TEST TYPES AND RESULTS (FOR BLUETOOTH LE) ............................................. 23 5.1 RADIATED EMISSION AND BANDEDGE MEASUREMENT..................................... 23 5.1.1 LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION AND BANDEDGE MEASUREMENT .................. 23 5.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS ............................................................................................... 23 5.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES ................................................................................................ 23 5.1.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ...................................................................... 23 5.1.5 TEST SETUP ............................................................................................................. 23 5.1.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 23 5.1.7 TEST RESULTS ......................................................................................................... 24 5.2 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT ............................................................. 26 5.2.1 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT........................................... 26 5.2.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS ............................................................................................... 26 5.2.3 TEST PROCEDURES ................................................................................................ 26 5.2.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ...................................................................... 26 5.2.5 TEST SETUP ............................................................................................................. 26 5.2.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 26 Report No.: RF140728C21-2 2 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

5.2.7 TEST RESULTS ......................................................................................................... 27 6. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION ................................................. 29 7. INFORMATION ON THE TESTING LABORATORIES ............................................... 30 8. APPENDIX A – MODIFICATIONS RECORDERS FOR ENGINEERING CHANGES TO THE EUT BY THE LAB ......................................................................................... 31 Report No.: RF140728C21-2 3 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

RELEASE CONTROL RECORD ISSUE NO. REASON FOR CHANGE DATE ISSUED RF140728C21-2 Original release. Sep. 12, 2014 Report No.: RF140728C21-2 4 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

1. CERTIFICATION PRODUCT: PCIE 802.11a/b/g/n 2.4GHz/5GHz + USB BT 4.0 card MODEL NO.: AR5B22 BRAND: Atheros APPLICANT: Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. TESTED: Sep. 01 ~ Sep. 12, 2014 TEST SAMPLE: ENGINEERING SAMPLE STANDARDS: FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.247) ANSI C63.10-2009 The above equipment (model: AR5B22) has been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the sample’s EMC characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. PREPARED BY : , DATE : Sep. 12, 2014 Pettie Chen / Senior Specialist APPROVED BY : , DATE : Sep. 12, 2014 Ken Liu / Senior Manager Report No.: RF140728C21-2 5 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

2. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS The EUT has been tested according to the following specifications: APPLIED STANDARD: FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Bluetooth EDR) STANDARD TEST TYPE AND LIMIT RESULT REMARK SECTION Meet the requirement of limit. 15.207 AC Power Conducted Emission PASS Minimum passing margin is -18.82dB at 0.45469MHz. Meet the requirement of limit. 15.205 & 209 Radiated Emissions PASS Minimum passing margin is -3.7dB at 449.70MHz. NOTE: If The Frequency Hopping System operating in 2400-2483.5MHz band and the output power less than 125mW. The hopping channel carrier frequencies separated by a minimum of 25kHz or two-thirds of the 20dB bandwidth of hopping channel whichever is greater. APPLIED STANDARD: FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Bluetooth LE) STANDARD TEST TYPE AND LIMIT RESULT REMARK SECTION Meet the requirement of limit. 15.207 AC Power Conducted Emission PASS Minimum passing margin is -17.06dB at 0.48984MHz. Meet the requirement of limit. 15.205 & 209 Radiated Emissions PASS Minimum passing margin is -3.3dB at 449.70MHz. 2.1 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for tests performed on the EUT as specified in CISPR 16-4-2: MEASUREMENT FREQUENCY UNCERTAINTY Conducted emission 150kHz ~ 30MHz 2.44 dB 30MHz ~ 200MHz 3.63 dB 200MHz ~1000MHz 3.64 dB Radiated emissions 1GHz ~ 18GHz 2.29 dB 18GHz ~ 40GHz 2.29 dB This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 6 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

3. GENERAL INFORMATION 3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT EUT PCIE 802.11a/b/g/n 2.4GHz/5GHz + USB BT 4.0 card MODEL NO. AR5B22 POWER SUPPLY 3.3Vdc (host equipment) Bluetooth EDR GFSK, π/4-DQPSK, 8DPSK MODULATION TYPE Bluetooth LE 4.0 GFSK Bluetooth EDR 1/2/3Mbps TRANSFER RATE Bluetooth LE 4.0 1Mbps OPERATING FREQUENCY 2402 ~ 2480MHz Bluetooth EDR 79 NUMBER OF CHANNEL Bluetooth LE 4.0 40 Bluetooth EDR 1MHz CHANNEL SPACING Bluetooth LE 4.0 2MHz ANTENNA TYPE Refer to Note ANTENNA CONNECTOR Refer to Note DATA CABLE N/A I/O PORTS Refer to user’s manual ACCESSORY DEVICES N/A NOTE: 1. This report is prepared for FCC class II permissive change. This report is issued as a supplementary report of BV ADT report no.: RF110907E02-2 R1. The differences compared with the original design are as below: * Adding specific host portable * Adding antenna (same type/low gain) According the worst case of original test report, only AC Power Conducted Emission & Radiated Emissions had been tested. 2. There is one set of antenna provided to this EUT, please refer to the following table: Antenna Gain (dBi) No Brand Model Antenna Type Connector 2.4GHz 5.18 GHz 5.32 GHz 5.5 GHz 5.745 GHz Main EM24580409 IPEX 0.497932 -1.24142 -1.21835 -1.12629 1.56537 PENSON PIFA Aux EM24580410 IPEX 2.71072 3.03969 2.23989 2.81597 3.51485 3. The above EUT information is declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description, please refer to the manufacturer's specifications or User's Manual. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 7 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

3.2 DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES Bluetooth EDR: 79 channels are provided to this EUT: FREQ. FREQ. FREQ. FREQ. CHANNEL CHANNEL CHANNEL CHANNEL (MHz) (MHz) (MHz) (MHz) 0 2402 20 2422 40 2442 60 2462 1 2403 21 2423 41 2443 61 2463 2 2404 22 2424 42 2444 62 2464 3 2405 23 2425 43 2445 63 2465 4 2406 24 2426 44 2446 64 2466 5 2407 25 2427 45 2447 65 2467 6 2408 26 2428 46 2448 66 2468 7 2409 27 2429 47 2449 67 2469 8 2410 28 2430 48 2450 68 2470 9 2411 29 2431 49 2451 69 2471 10 2412 30 2432 50 2452 70 2472 11 2413 31 2433 51 2453 71 2473 12 2414 32 2434 52 2454 72 2474 13 2415 33 2435 53 2455 73 2475 14 2416 34 2436 54 2456 74 2476 15 2417 35 2437 55 2457 75 2477 16 2418 36 2438 56 2458 76 2478 17 2419 37 2439 57 2459 77 2479 18 2420 38 2440 58 2460 78 2480 19 2421 39 2441 59 2461 Bluetooth LE 4.0: 40 channels are provided to this EUT: FREQ. FREQ. FREQ. FREQ. CHANNEL CHANNEL CHANNEL CHANNEL (MHz) (MHz) (MHz) (MHz) 0 2402 10 2422 20 2442 30 2462 1 2404 11 2424 21 2444 31 2464 2 2406 12 2426 22 2446 32 2466 3 2408 13 2428 23 2448 33 2468 4 2410 14 2430 24 2450 34 2470 5 2412 15 2432 25 2452 35 2472 6 2414 16 2434 26 2454 36 2474 7 2416 17 2436 27 2456 37 2476 8 2418 18 2438 28 2458 38 2478 9 2420 19 2440 29 2460 39 2480 Report No.: RF140728C21-2 8 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

3.2.1 TEST MODE APPLICABILITY AND TESTED CHANNEL DETAIL Bluetooth EDR: EUT APPLICABLE TO CONFIGURE DESCRIPTION MODE RE1G RE<1G PLC - √ √ √ - Where RE1G: Radiated Emission above 1GHz RE<1G: Radiated Emission below 1GHz PLC: Power Line Conducted Emission NOTE: The EUT had been pre-tested on the positioned of each 3 axis. The worst case was found when positioned on X-plane. RADIATED EMISSION TEST (ABOVE 1 GHz): Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture) and packet type. Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT AVAILABLE TESTED MODULATION MODULATION CONFIGURE PACKET TYPE CHANNEL CHANNEL TECHNOLOGY TYPE MODE - 0 to 78 78 FHSS 8DPSK DH5 RADIATED EMISSION TEST (BELOW 1 GHz): Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture) and packet type. Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT AVAILABLE TESTED MODULATION MODULATION CONFIGURE PACKET TYPE CHANNEL CHANNEL TECHNOLOGY TYPE MODE - 0 to 78 78 FHSS 8DPSK DH5 POWER LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION: Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture) and packet type. Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT AVAILABLE TESTED MODULATION MODULATION CONFIGURE PACKET TYPE CHANNEL CHANNEL TECHNOLOGY TYPE MODE - 0 to 78 78 FHSS 8DPSK DH5 TEST CONDITION: INPUT POWER APPLICABLE TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS TESTED BY (SYSTEM) RE1G 25deg. C, 65%RH 120Vac, 60Hz Ted Chang RE<1G 25deg. C, 65%RH 120Vac, 60Hz Ted Chang PLC 20deg. C, 70%RH 120Vac, 60Hz Nick Hsu Report No.: RF140728C21-2 9 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

Bluetooth LE: EUT APPLICABLE TO CONFIGURE DESCRIPTION MODE RE1G RE<1G PLC - √ √ √ - Where RE1G: Radiated Emission above 1GHz RE<1G: Radiated Emission below 1GHz PLC: Power Line Conducted Emission NOTE: The EUT had been pre-tested on the positioned of each 3 axis. The worst case was found when positioned on X-plane. RADIATED EMISSION TEST (ABOVE 1GHz): Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT CONFIGURE AVAILABLE TESTED CHANNEL MODULATION TYPE DATA RATE (Mbps) MODE CHANNEL - 0 to 39 39 GFSK 1.0 RADIATED EMISSION TEST (BELOW 1GHz): Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT CONFIGURE AVAILABLE TESTED CHANNEL MODULATION TYPE DATA RATE (Mbps) MODE CHANNEL - 0 to 39 39 GFSK 1.0 POWER LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION: Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. EUT CONFIGURE AVAILABLE TESTED CHANNEL MODULATION TYPE DATA RATE (Mbps) MODE CHANNEL - 0 to 39 39 GFSK 1.0 TEST CONDITION: INPUT POWER APPLICABLE TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS TESTED BY (SYSTEM) RE1G 21deg. C, 71%RH 120Vac, 60Hz Nick Hsu RE<1G 25deg. C, 65%RH 120Vac, 60Hz Ted Chang PLC 20deg. C, 70%RH 120Vac, 60Hz Nick Hsu Report No.: RF140728C21-2 10 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

3.3 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS The EUT has been tested as an independent unit together with other necessary accessories or support units. The following support units or accessories were used to form a representative test configuration during the tests. NO. PRODUCT BRAND MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. FCC ID entegra 1 Crossfire 940-10-972 NA NA technologies inc. 2 Adapter of Crossfire FSP GROUP INC. FSP060-DBAE1 NA NA NO. SIGNAL CABLE DESCRIPTION OF THE ABOVE SUPPORT UNITS 1 NA 2 NA NOTE: 1. All power cords of the above support units are non shielded (1.8m). 2. Item 1, 2 were provided by client. 3.3.1 CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST EUT Crossfire (Power from host equipment) *Test table 3.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED STANDARDS The EUT is a RF Product. According to the specifications of the manufacturer, it must comply with the requirements of the following standards: FCC Part 15, Subpart C (15.247) 558074 D01 DTS Meas Guidance v03r02 FCC Public Notice DA 00-705 ANSI C63.10-2009 All test items have been performed and recorded as per the above standards. NOTE: The EUT is also considered as a kind of computer peripheral, because the connection to computer is necessary for typical use. It has been verified to comply with the requirements of FCC Part 15, Subpart B, Class B (DoC). The test report has been issued separately. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 11 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

4. TEST TYPES AND RESULTS (BLUETOOTH EDR) 4.1 RADIATED EMISSION AND BANDEDGE MEASUREMENT 4.1.1 LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION AND BANDEDGE MEASUREMENT Radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands must comply with the radiated emission limits specified as below table. Other emissions shall be at least 20dB below the highest level of the desired power: FIELD STRENGTH MEASUREMENT DISTANCE FREQUENCIES (MHz) (microvolts/meter) (meters) 0.009 ~ 0.490 2400/F(kHz) 300 0.490 ~ 1.705 24000/F(kHz) 30 1.705 ~ 30.0 30 30 30 ~ 88 100 3 88 ~ 216 150 3 216 ~ 960 200 3 Above 960 500 3 NOTE: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. 2. Emission level (dBuV/m) = 20 log Emission level (uV/m). 3. For frequencies above 1000MHz, the field strength limits are based on average detector, however, the peak field strength of any emission shall not exceed the maximum permitted average limits, specified above by more than 20dB under any condition of modulation. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 12 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

4.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS DESCRIPTION & DATE OF DUE DATE OF MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER CALIBRATION CALIBRATION Test Receiver ESCS30 100289 Nov. 29, 2013 Nov. 28, 2014 ROHDE & SCHWARZ Spectrum Analyzer FSP40 100269 Feb. 11, 2014 Feb. 10, 2015 ROHDE & SCHWARZ BILOG Antenna VULB9168 9168-156 Feb. 25, 2014 Feb. 24, 2015 SCHWARZBECK HORN Antenna BBHA 9120 D 9120D-209 Sep. 12, 2013 Sep. 11, 2014 SCHWARZBECK HORN Antenna BBHA 9170 BBHA9170241 Feb. 17, 2014 Feb. 16, 2015 SCHWARZBECK Preamplifier 8449B 3008A01961 Oct. 28, 2013 Oct. 27, 2014 Agilent Preamplifier 8447D 2944A10638 Oct. 18, 2013 Oct. 17, 2014 Agilent RF signal cable 309219/4 SUCOFLEX 104 Oct. 18, 2013 Oct. 17, 2014 HUBER+SUHNNER 2950114 RF signal cable SUCOFLEX 104 250130/4 Oct. 18, 2013 Oct. 17, 2014 HUBER+SUHNNER RF signal cable 5D-FB Cable-HYCH9-01 Aug. 11, 2014 Aug. 10, 2015 Worken Software ADT_Radiated_ NA NA NA BV ADT V7.6.15.9.4 Antenna Tower 2070/2080 512.835.4684 NA NA EMCO Turn Table 2087-2.03 NA NA NA EMCO Antenna Tower &Turn Table Controller 2090 NA NA NA EMCO NOTE: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in HwaYa Chamber 9. 3. The horn antenna and HP preamplifier (model: 8449B) are used only for the measurement of emission frequency above 1GHz if tested. 4. The FCC Site Registration No. is 460141. 5. The IC Site Registration No. is IC 7450F-4. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 13 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

4.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters above the ground at a 3 meter semi-anechoic chamber. The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. b. The EUT was set 3 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower. c. The antenna is a broadband antenna, and its height is varied from one meter to four meters above the ground to determine the maximum value of the field strength. Both horizontal and vertical polarizations of the antenna are set to make the measurement. d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and then the antenna was tuned to heights from 1 meter to 4 meters and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading. e. The test-receiver system was set to Peak Detect Function and Specified Bandwidth with Maximum Hold Mode. f. If the emission level of the EUT in peak mode was lower than the limit specified, then testing could be stopped and the peak values of the EUT would be reported. Otherwise the emissions would be re-tested one by one using peak, quasi-peak or average method as specified and then reported in a data sheet. NOTE: 1. The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 120kHz for Quasi-peak detection at frequency below 1GHz. 2. The resolution bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 1 MHz and video bandwidth is 3MHz for Peak detection at frequency above 1GHz. 3. All modes of operation were investigated and the worst-case emissions are reported. 4.1.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD No deviation. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 14 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

4.1.5 TEST SETUP Frequency range 30MHz~1GHz Frequency range above 1GHz For the actual test configuration, please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). 4.1.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS Installed the EUT in the Crossfire and set the EUT under transmission condition continuously at specific channel frequency. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 15 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

4.1.7 TEST RESULTS ABOVE 1GHz DATA： 8DPSK CHANNEL TX Channel 78 DETECTOR Peak (PK) FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz FUNCTION ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 *2480.00 93.0 PK 1.26 H 132 59.60 33.40 2 *2480.00 62.9 AV 1.26 H 132 29.50 33.40 3 2483.50 47.6 PK 74.0 -26.4 1.26 H 132 14.20 33.40 4 2483.50 17.6 AV 54.0 -36.4 1.26 H 132 -15.80 33.40 5 4960.00 45.3 PK 74.0 -28.7 1.05 H 253 43.60 1.70 6 4960.00 15.2 AV 54.0 -38.8 1.05 H 253 13.50 1.70 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 *2480.00 91.2 PK 1.00 V 168 57.80 33.40 2 *2480.00 61.1 AV 1.00 V 168 27.70 33.40 3 2483.50 45.9 PK 74.0 -28.1 1.26 V 132 12.50 33.40 4 2483.50 15.8 AV 54.0 -38.2 1.26 V 132 -17.60 33.40 5 4960.00 45.2 PK 74.0 -28.8 1.03 V 71 43.50 1.70 6 4960.00 15.1 AV 54.0 -38.9 1.03 V 71 13.40 1.70 REMARKS: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level – Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. 6. The DH5 packet was the worst case duty cycle for a transmit dwell time on a channel, based upon bluetooth theory the transmitter is on 0.625 * 5 per 296.25 ms per channel. Therefore, the duty cycle correlation factor be equal to: 20log(3.125 / 100)= -30.1 dB 7. Average value = peak reading + 20log(duty cycle). Report No.: RF140728C21-2 16 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

BELOW 1GHz WORST-CASE DATA： 8DPSK CHANNEL TX Channel 78 DETECTOR Quasi-Peak (QP) FREQUENCY RANGE 30MHz ~ 1GHz FUNCTION ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 143.90 37.8 QP 43.5 -5.7 2.07 H 120 52.20 -14.40 2 239.90 39.3 QP 46.0 -6.7 1.00 H 177 54.00 -14.70 3 449.70 42.3 QP 46.0 -3.7 1.49 H 168 51.50 -9.20 4 487.00 38.2 QP 46.0 -7.8 1.24 H 182 47.00 -8.80 5 583.40 35.8 QP 46.0 -10.2 1.24 H 207 42.50 -6.70 6 749.70 37.5 QP 46.0 -8.5 1.49 H 207 41.20 -3.70 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 58.00 33.8 QP 40.0 -6.2 1.00 V 162 48.30 -14.50 2 196.30 32.3 QP 43.5 -11.2 1.00 V 115 48.90 -16.60 3 333.10 37.4 QP 46.0 -8.6 1.49 V 9 49.10 -11.70 4 500.30 40.8 QP 46.0 -5.2 1.00 V 216 49.40 -8.60 5 583.50 35.2 QP 46.0 -10.8 1.00 V 215 41.90 -6.70 6 667.30 38.2 QP 46.0 -7.8 1.25 V 189 43.50 -5.30 REMARKS: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level – Limit value Report No.: RF140728C21-2 17 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

4.2 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT 4.2.1 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT FREQUENCY OF EMISSION (MHz) CONDUCTED LIMIT (dBµV) Quasi-peak Average 0.15 ~ 0.5 66 to 56 56 to 46 0.5 ~ 5 56 46 5 ~ 30 60 50 NOTE: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. 2. The limit decreases in line with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 to 0.50MHz. 3. All emanations from a class A/B digital device or system, including any network of conductors and apparatus connected thereto, shall not exceed the level of field strengths specified above. 4.2.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS DESCRIPTION & DATE OF DUE DATE OF MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER CALIBRATION CALIBRATION Test Receiver ESCS30 100288 Apr. 24, 2014 Apr. 23, 2015 ROHDE & SCHWARZ RF signal cable 5D-FB Cable-HYCO2-01 Dec. 27, 2013 Dec. 26, 2014 Woken LISN ROHDE & SCHWARZ ESH2-Z5 100100 Dec. 23, 2013 Dec. 22, 2014 (EUT) LISN ROHDE & SCHWARZ ESH3-Z5 100312 Jul. 10, 2014 Jul. 09, 2015 (Peripheral) Software BV ADT_Cond_ NA NA NA ADT V7.3.7.3 NOTE: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in HwaYa Shielded Room 2. 3. The VCCI Site Registration No. is C-2047. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 18 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

4.2.3 TEST PROCEDURES a. The EUT was placed 0.4 meters from the conducting wall of the shielded room with EUT being connected to the power mains through a line impedance stabilization network (LISN). Other support units were connected to the power mains through another LISN. The two LISNs provide 50 ohm/ 50uH of coupling impedance for the measuring instrument. b. Both lines of the power mains connected to the EUT were checked for maximum conducted interference. c. The frequency range from 150kHz to 30MHz was searched. Emission levels under (Limit - 20dB) was not recorded. NOTE: All modes of operation were investigated and the worst-case emissions are reported. 4.2.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD No deviation. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 19 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

4.2.5 TEST SETUP Ve r tic a l G ro u n d R e fe r e n c e P la n e Te s t R e c e iv e r EUT 40cm 80cm L IS N H o r iz o n ta l G ro u n d R e fe r e n c e P la n e N o te : 1 .S u p p o rt u n its w e r e c o n n e c te d t o s e c o n d L IS N . 2 .B o th o f L IS N s ( A M N ) a r e 8 0 c m fr o m E U T a n d a t le a s t 8 0 fr o m o th e r u n its a n d o th e r m e ta l p la n e s For the actual test configuration, please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). 4.2.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS Same as 4.1.6. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 20 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

4.2.7 TEST RESULTS CONDUCTED WORST—CASE DATA : SDPSK PHaSE Line 1 6dB BANDWIDTH |okHz Freq Corr. |Reading Value ETLSVS;" Limit Margin No "Fastor ~Tag (avj] (oB (uv)] [oB (ov)] (aB) mng s ar av ar avy ar avy ar a. 1| 0.15000_|—0.26_| 45. 19 290.08 45.45 29.34 66.00 56.00 —20.55 »o6.66 2 o rmmsa o 27| 3762 18. 77 37.89 19.04 6461 S4.61 2672 3557 3 040250 030| 35.98 25.55 36.28 25.95 506.55 46.05 2036 —20.00 2 o.s6563 032| 2081 21.59 30. 13 22.01 56.00 46.00 —25.87 —23.99 5 093125 ~—o31| 2897 21.17 2031 21.51 56.00 246.00 —26.69 —24.49 6 1747266 |~—o.56_| 290.44 21.58 30.00 2224 50.00 50.00 —30.00 —27.76 REMARKS: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi—peak and average individually. 2. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 3. Margin value = Emission level — Limit value 4. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 5. Emission Level = Corection Factor + Reading Value aoue no— wo— ols the who sube ie Report No.: RF140728C21—2 21 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

PHaSE Line 2 6dB BANDWIDTH |okHz Freq Corr. |Reading Value ETLSVS;" Limit Margin No Fastor T38 (avj] [aB (uv) [a5 (ov)] (aB) mng s ar av ar avy ar avy ar a. 1| 0. 15301 —0.27—| azs6 27.18 a2.93 27.45 o570 55.79 —22.80 2831 2 o19207 o 28| 4028 27.59 4056 27.87 a3.91 53.91 2335 —26.04 3 o.4sa69_| _o.30_| 3767 27.01 3a7.97 27.01 5670 an.zo —i8.82 18.88 2| o.669053_| 032| 3204 23.09 3236 25.41 56.00 46.00 —23.64 2250 5 osa141_|_o33_| 25.66 2110 25.99 21.43 56.00 46.00 —27.01 —24.57 6 1725301 _o.60_| 3032 2218 30.92 2278 50.00 50.00 —2a.08 2722 REMARKS: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi—peak and average individually. 2. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 3. Margin value = Emission level — Limit value 4. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 5. Emission Level = Corection Factor + Reading Value aoue no— PiCTrace > wo— ar Limea L cmtime Low« who sube ie Report No.: RF140728021—2 22 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

5. TEST TYPES AND RESULTS (FOR BLUETOOTH LE) 5.1 RADIATED EMISSION AND BANDEDGE MEASUREMENT 5.1.1 LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION AND BANDEDGE MEASUREMENT Same as 4.1.1. 5.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS Same as 4.1.2. 5.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES Same as 4.1.3. 5.1.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD No deviation. 5.1.5 TEST SETUP Same as 4.1.5. 5.1.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS Same as 4.1.6. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 23 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

5.1.7 TEST RESULTS ABOVE 1GHz DATA CHANNEL TX Channel 39 DETECTOR Peak (PK) FREQUENCY RANGE 1GHz ~ 25GHz FUNCTION Average (AV) ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 *2480.00 97.1 PK 1.29 H 296 63.70 33.40 2 *2480.00 92.8 AV 1.29 H 296 59.40 33.40 3 2483.50 56.6 PK 74.0 -17.4 1.29 H 278 23.20 33.40 4 2483.50 45.4 AV 54.0 -8.6 1.29 H 278 12.00 33.40 5 4960.00 47.3 PK 74.0 -26.7 1.09 H 155 40.90 6.40 6 4960.00 34.0 AV 54.0 -20.0 1.09 H 155 27.60 6.40 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 *2480.00 96.9 PK 1.56 V 265 63.50 33.40 2 *2480.00 92.9 AV 1.56 V 265 59.50 33.40 3 2483.50 56.7 PK 74.0 -17.3 1.54 V 263 23.30 33.40 4 2483.50 46.1 AV 54.0 -7.9 1.54 V 263 12.70 33.40 5 4960.00 46.9 PK 74.0 -27.1 1.44 V 194 40.50 6.40 6 4960.00 34.3 AV 54.0 -19.7 1.44 V 194 27.90 6.40 REMARKS: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level – Limit value 5. " * ": Fundamental frequency. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 24 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

BELOW 1GHz WORST-CASE DATA CHANNEL TX Channel 39 DETECTOR Quasi-Peak (QP) FREQUENCY RANGE 30MHz ~ 1GHz FUNCTION ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 143.90 38.2 QP 43.5 -5.3 2.05 H 100 52.60 -14.40 2 239.90 39.9 QP 46.0 -6.1 1.00 H 188 54.60 -14.70 3 449.70 42.7 QP 46.0 -3.3 1.24 H 178 51.90 -9.20 4 487.00 38.5 QP 46.0 -7.5 1.00 H 125 47.30 -8.80 5 583.40 36.5 QP 46.0 -9.5 1.12 H 209 43.20 -6.70 6 749.70 38.4 QP 46.0 -7.6 1.49 H 207 42.10 -3.70 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 58.00 34.0 QP 40.0 -6.0 1.00 V 169 48.50 -14.50 2 196.30 32.2 QP 43.5 -11.3 1.00 V 119 48.80 -16.60 3 333.10 37.8 QP 46.0 -8.2 1.53 V 28 49.50 -11.70 4 500.30 40.8 QP 46.0 -5.2 1.00 V 216 49.40 -8.60 5 583.50 35.5 QP 46.0 -10.5 1.00 V 211 42.20 -6.70 6 667.30 38.9 QP 46.0 -7.1 1.10 V 175 44.20 -5.30 REMARKS: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level – Limit value Report No.: RF140728C21-2 25 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

5.2 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT 5.2.1 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT Same as 4.2.1. 5.2.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS Same as 4.2.2. 5.2.3 TEST PROCEDURES Same as 4.2.3. 5.2.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD No deviation. 5.2.5 TEST SETUP Same as 4.2.5. 5.2.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS Same as 4.2.6. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 26 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

5.2.7 TEST RESULTS CONDUCTED WORST CASE DATA: PHASE Line 1 6dB BANDWIDTH OkHz : Emission l ; No Freq. F:z:gr Reading Value Level Limit Margin o [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] (dB) mhg e or avy. or av or av. ar aV. D.is7a1_|_0.27 47.47 32.20 47.74 32.56 65.58 55.58 —17.84_| —23.02 ofula l — o.i695s_| 0.27 45.07 29.54 45.34 20.81 64.98 54.98 ~19.64_| 25. 17 ozi05_| o28 5048 24.73 39.76 25.01 63.16 53.16 23.40 2815 ozzes1_| _o28 3201 16.58 32.80 t8.86 6251 5251 2002 33.65 o.4sas4 o.31 34.29 28.50 34.60 20.11_| 56.17 46.17 —21.57_| 17.06 16.4zi8s |_0.55 31.47 2425 32.02 24.80 60.00 50.00 27.98 25.20 REMARKS: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi—peak and average individually. 2. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 3. Margin value = Emission level — Limit value 4. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 5. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value. cour mo Pn Tace 7 100 ar un mz carume ons ais 1e toe zons wite Report No.: RF140728C21—2 27 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

PHASE Line 2 6dB BANDWIDTH OkHz No Freq. F:z:gr Reading Value ET:;S;IOn Limit Margin [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] (dB) TMHz] (4p |o.r av or av |ar av or av. 1 0.15391 0.27 46.32 30.30 46.59 30.57 65.79 55.79 —19.20 —25.22 2 0.20859 0.28 30.66 26.33 39.94 26.61 63.26 53.26 —23.32 |—26.65 3 0.25156 0.29 32.73 22.19 33.02 22.48 61.71 51.71 —28.69 —29.23 4 0.52891 0.31 34.13 26.33 34.44 26.64 56.00 46.00 —21.56 —19.36 5 0.70850 0.32 32.22 24.29 3254 24.61 56.00 46.00 —23.46 |—21.39 6 16.37500 0.59 29.06 21.10 29.65 21.69 60.00 50.00 —30.35 —28.31 REMARKS: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi—peak and average individually. 2. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 3. Margin value = Emission level — Limit value 4. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 5. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value. asuy mo P Tace L~ 100 ar Unit a~ C Uinit ~ tobe s bo mie Report No.: RF140728C21—2 28 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

6. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION Please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). Report No.: RF140728C21-2 29 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

7. INFORMATION ON THE TESTING LABORATORIES We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited and approved according to ISO/IEC 17025. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following: Linko EMC/RF Lab: Hsin Chu EMC/RF/Telecom Lab: Tel: 886-2-26052180 Tel: 886-3-5935343 Fax: 886-2-26051924 Fax: 886-3-5935342 Hwa Ya EMC/RF/Safety Lab: Tel: 886-3-3183232 Fax: 886-3-3270892 Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com Web Site: www.bureauveritas-adt.com The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also. Report No.: RF140728C21-2 30 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0

8. APPENDIX A – MODIFICATIONS RECORDERS FOR ENGINEERING CHANGES TO THE EUT BY THE LAB No any modifications are made to the EUT by the lab during the test. --- END --- Report No.: RF140728C21-2 31 of 31 Report Format Version 5.1.0


Document Created: 2019-06-12 05:26:06
Document Modified: 2019-06-12 05:26:06
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC