Test Report JBP

FCC ID: PD92200BNHU

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_1567902

Test Certificate A sample of the following product received on September 27, 2011 and tested on October 6 and 7, 2011 complied with the requirements of, ƒ Subpart B of Part 15 of FCC Rules for Class B digital devices ƒ Industry Canada Interference Causing Equipment Standard ICES 003, dated February 2004 (Class B) given the measurement uncertainties detailed in Elliott report R85059. Intel Corporation Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 models 2200BNHMW and 2200BNHU _____________________ _______________________ David W. Bare Intel Corporation Chief Engineer _______________________ Printed Name Elliott Laboratories is accredited by the A2LA, certificate number 2016.01, to perform the test(s) listed in this report, except where noted otherwise. This report and the information contained herein represent the results of testing test articles identified and selected by the client performed to specifications and/or procedures selected by the client. National Technical Systems (NTS) makes no representations, expressed or implied, that such testing is adequate (or inadequate) to demonstrate efficiency, performance, reliability, or any other characteristic of the articles being tested, or similar products. This report should not be relied upon as an endorsement or certification by NTS of the equipment tested, nor does it represent any statement whatsoever as to its merchantability or fitness of the test article, or similar products, for a particular purpose. This report shall not be reproduced except in full Elliott Laboratories 41039 Boyce Road 510-578-3500 Phone www.elliottlabs.com Fremont, CA. 94538 510-440-9525 Fax

EMC Test Report Information Technology Equipment Class B Digital Device FCC Part 15 Industry Canada ICES 003 Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 models 2200BNHMW and 2200BNHU COMPANY: Intel Corporation 100 Center Point Circle Suite 200 Columbia, SC 29210 TEST SITE(S): Elliott Laboratories 41039 Boyce Road Fremont, CA. 94538-2435 REPORT DATE: October 21, 2011 FINAL TEST DATES: October 6 and 7, 2011 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: 29 PROGRAM MGR / QUALITY ASSURANCE DELEGATE / TECHNICAL REVIEWER: FINAL REPORT PREPARER: ______________________________ ______________________________ David W. Bare David Guidotti Chief Engineer Senior Technical Writer Elliott Laboratories is accredited by the A2LA, certificate number 2016.01, to perform the test(s) listed in this report, except where noted otherwise. This report and the information contained herein represent the results of testing test articles identified and selected by the client performed to specifications and/or procedures selected by the client. National Technical Systems (NTS) makes no representations, expressed or implied, that such testing is adequate (or inadequate) to demonstrate efficiency, performance, reliability, or any other characteristic of the articles being tested, or similar products. This report should not be relied upon as an endorsement or certification by NTS of the equipment tested, nor does it represent any statement whatsoever as to its merchantability or fitness of the test article, or similar products, for a particular purpose. This report shall not be reproduced except in full File: R85059 Page 2

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 REVISION HISTORY Rev# Date Comments Modified By - 10-21-2011 First release File: R85059 Page 3

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS REVISION HISTORY................................................................................................................................................3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................4 SCOPE..........................................................................................................................................................................5 OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................................................................................5 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE...........................................................................................................................5 DEVIATIONS FROM THE STANDARDS..............................................................................................................5 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT EMISSIONS TEST RESULTS ............................................6 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS (MAINS PORT) ........................................................................................................6 RADIATED EMISSIONS........................................................................................................................................6 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES .....................................................................................................................6 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DETAILS......................................................................................................7 GENERAL................................................................................................................................................................7 ENCLOSURE...........................................................................................................................................................7 MODIFICATIONS...................................................................................................................................................7 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.........................................................................................................................................7 EUT INTERFACE PORTS ......................................................................................................................................8 EUT OPERATION ...................................................................................................................................................8 EMISSIONS TESTING ..............................................................................................................................................9 RADIATED AND CONDUCTED EMISSIONS.....................................................................................................9 RADIATED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS ..................................................................................... 9 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................. 9 EMISSIONS MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION .....................................................................................10 RECEIVER SYSTEM ............................................................................................................................................10 INSTRUMENT CONTROL COMPUTER ............................................................................................................10 LINE IMPEDANCE STABILIZATION NETWORK (LISN)...............................................................................10 IMPEDANCE STABILIZATION NETWORK (ISN) ...........................................................................................10 FILTERS/ATTENUATORS ..................................................................................................................................10 ANTENNAS...........................................................................................................................................................11 ANTENNA MAST AND EQUIPMENT TURNTABLE .......................................................................................11 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION...........................................................................................................................11 EMISSIONS TEST PROCEDURES .......................................................................................................................12 EUT AND CABLE PLACEMENT ........................................................................................................................12 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS (MAINS) .................................................................................................................12 RADIATED EMISSIONS (SEMI-ANECHOIC AND/OR OATS TEST ENVIRONMENT) ................................13 Preliminary Scan...................................................................................................................................... 13 Final Maximization.................................................................................................................................. 13 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS ...................................................................................................................................14 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS - CONDUCTED EMISSIONS ...............................................................................14 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS - RADIATED EMISSIONS....................................................................................14 APPENDIX A TEST EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION DATA ..............................................................................15 APPENDIX B TEST DATA .....................................................................................................................................16 APPENDIX C PRODUCT LABELING REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................26 APPENDIX D USER MANUAL REGULATORY STATEMENTS ....................................................................27 APPENDIX E BASIC AND REFERENCE STANDARDS ...................................................................................28 SUBPART B OF PART 15 OF FCC RULES FOR DIGITAL DEVICES. .....................................................................28 END OF REPORT ....................................................................................................................................................29 File: R85059 Page 4

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 SCOPE Governments and standards organizations around the world have published requirements regarding the electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of electronic equipment. Testing has been performed on the Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 model 2200BNHMW and 2200BNHU, pursuant to the following standards. Standard Title Standard Date FCC Part 15, Subpart B Radio Frequency Devices October 2010 as Amended ICES-003, Issue 4 Digital apparatus 2004 All measurements and evaluations have been in accordance with these specifications, test procedures, and measurement guidelines as outlined in Elliott Laboratories test procedures, and in accordance with the standards referenced therein (refer to Appendix E). OBJECTIVE The objective of Intel Corporation is to verify compliance with FCC requirements for digital devices and Canada’s requirements for digital devices; STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The tested sample of Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 models 2200BNHMW and 2200BNHU complied with the requirements of: Standard/Regulation Equipment Type/Class Standard Date Subpart B of Part 15 of the FCC Rules Class B 2010 as amended (CFR title 47) ICES-003, Issue 4 Class B 2004 The test results recorded herein are based on a single type test of the Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 model 2200BNHMW and 2200BNHU and therefore apply only to the tested sample(s). The sample was selected and prepared by Steve Hackett of Intel Corporation. Maintenance of compliance is the responsibility of the company. Any modification of the product that could result in increased emissions or susceptibility should be checked to ensure compliance has been maintained (i.e., printed circuit board layout changes, different enclosure, different line filter or power supply, harnessing and/or interface cable changes, etc.). DEVIATIONS FROM THE STANDARDS No deviations were made from the published requirements listed in the scope of this report. File: R85059 Page 5

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT EMISSIONS TEST RESULTS The following emissions tests were performed on the Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 model 2200BNHMW and 2200BNHU. The measurements were extracted from the data recorded during testing and represent the highest amplitude emissions relative to the specification limits. The complete test data is provided in the appendices of this report. CONDUCTED EMISSIONS (MAINS PORT) Frequency Range Standard/Section Requirement Measurement Margin Status Operating Voltage 0.15-0.5 MHz: 66-56 dBµV QP 56-46 dBµV Av 0.5-5.0 MHz: 0.15-30 MHz, FCC § 15.107(a) 62.0dBµV @ 56 dBµV QP -3.8dB Complied 120V, 60Hz (Class B) 0.154MHz 46 dBµV Av 5.0-30.0 MHz: 60 dBµV QP 50 dBµV Av RADIATED EMISSIONS Frequency Range Standard/Section Requirement Measurement Margin Status 30 – 230, 30 dBµV/m FCC §15.109(g) 39.3dBµV/m 30-1000 MHz 230 – 1000, -6.7dB Complied Class B @398.59 MHz 37 dBµV/m (10m limit) 54.0 dBµV/m Av 1000-40000 MHz FCC §15.109(a) 74.0 dBµV/m Pk N/A – Note 1 Note 1 Class B (3m limit) Note 1 Testing above 1GHz against FCC 15.109(a) requirements was not required because the highest frequency generated in the EUT was declared to be less than 108 MHz. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES ISO/IEC 17025 requires that an estimate of the measurement uncertainties associated with the emissions test results be included in the report. The measurement uncertainties given below were calculated using the approach described in CISPR 16-4-2:2003 using a coverage factor of k=2, which gives a level of confidence of approximately 95%. The levels were found to be below levels of Ucispr and therefore no adjustment of the data for measurement uncertainty is required. Measurement Type Measurement Unit Frequency Range Expanded Uncertainty Conducted Emissions dBuV or dBuA 150kHz – 30MHz ± 2.2 dB 30 – 1000 MHz ± 3.6 dB Radiated Electric Field dBuV/m 1000 – 40,000 MHz ± 6.0 dB File: R85059 Page 6

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DETAILS GENERAL The Intel Corporation model Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 models 2200BNHMW and 2200BNHU are PCIe Half Mini Card form factor IEEE 802.11b/g/n wireless network adapters. The cards support MIMO (2x2) for 802.11n modes and MISO (1x2) for 802.11a/b/g modes. The card is sold under two different FCC/IC ID numbers (see table below). The ID's ending in "U" are intended to allow user install conditions and host systems must be provided with a BIOS locking feature that prevents installation of unauthorized devices. For radio testing purposes the card was installed in a test fixture that exposed all sides of the card. For digital device testing for certification under equipment code JBP the card was installed inside a laptop PC. The sample was received on September 27, 2011 and tested on October 6 and 7, 2011. The EUT consisted of the following component(s): Company Model Description Serial Number FCC ID PCIe Half Mini PD92200BNH Card form factor 001500825F2C PD92200BNHU 2200BNHMW Intel IEEE (JBP) 1000M- Corporation 802.11b/g/n 001500825F4C 2200BNH wireless (DTS) 1000M- 2200BNHU network adapter 2200BNHU ENCLOSURE The EUT has no enclosure. It is designed to be installed within the enclosure of a host computer. MODIFICATIONS No modifications were made to the EUT during the time the product was at Elliott. SUPPORT EQUIPMENT The following equipment was used as local support equipment for testing: Company Model Description Serial Number FCC ID Dell Latitude Laptop 162-047-551-87 - HP 5650 Printer MY3883K42P - EUT was installed inside the Laptop The following equipment was used as remote support equipment for testing: Company Model Description Serial Number FCC ID Netgear GS108 Hub GS16152CB035 - 447 File: R85059 Page 7

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 EUT INTERFACE PORTS The I/O cabling configuration during emissions testing was as follows: Port Cable(s) From To Description Shielded/Unshielded Length(m) USB Printer USB Shielded 2 Ethernet Hub CAT 5 Unshielded 5 AC Power AC Mains 3 Wire 1 Adptor Unshielded AC Power DC Power 2 Wire 1.5 Adaptor Unshielded EUT OPERATION During emissions testing the digital interface to the EUT was active, the laptop was showing a scrolling H pattern and the peripheral interfaces were enabled and active. File: R85059 Page 8

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 EMISSIONS TESTING RADIATED AND CONDUCTED EMISSIONS Final test measurements were taken at the Elliott Laboratories Anechoic Chambers listed below. The test sites contain separate areas for radiated and conducted emissions testing. The sites conform to the requirements of ANSI C63.4: 2003 American National Standard for Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz and CISPR 16-1-4:2007 - Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods Part 1-4: Radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus Ancillary equipment Radiated disturbances. They are registered with the VCCI and are on file with the FCC and Industry Canada. Registration Numbers Site Location VCCI FCC Canada 41039 Boyce Road R-1683 Chamber 3 769238 IC 2845B-3 Fremont, C-1795 CA 94538-2435 RADIATED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS Radiated emissions measurements were made with the EUT powered from a supply voltage within the expected tolerances of each nominal operating voltage/frequency for each geographical regions covered by the scope of the standards referenced in this report. CONDUCTED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS Conducted emissions testing is performed in conformance with ANSI C63.4 and CISPR 22. Mains port measurements are made with the EUT connected to the public power network through a nominal, standardized RF impedance, which is provided by a line impedance stabilization network, known as a LISN. A LISN is inserted in series with each current- carrying conductor in the EUT power cord. Telecommunication port measurements are made with the unshielded network cable connected through an impedance stabilization network (ISN) appropriate to the type of cable employed. Where no suitable ISN is available measurements are made using a capacitive voltage probe (CVP) and a current probe. If shielded cables are specified for the port under test the measurement is made of the noise voltage on the shield of the cable via a 100 ohm resistor. File: R85059 Page 9

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 EMISSIONS MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION RECEIVER SYSTEM An EMI receiver as specified in CISPR 16-1-1:2006 is used for emissions measurements. The receivers used can measure over the frequency range of 9 kHz up to 7 GHz. These receivers allow both ease of measurement and high accuracy to be achieved. The receivers have Peak, Average, and CISPR (Quasi-peak) detectors built into their design so no external adapters are necessary. The receiver automatically sets the required bandwidth for the CISPR detector used during measurements. For measurements above the frequency range of the receivers, a spectrum analyzer is utilized because it provides visibility of the entire spectrum along with the precision and versatility required to support engineering analysis. Average measurements above 1000 MHz are performed on the spectrum analyzer using the linear-average method with a resolution bandwidth of 1 MHz and a video bandwidth of 10 Hz. INSTRUMENT CONTROL COMPUTER Measurements are converted to the field strength at an antenna or voltage developed at the LISN (or ISN) measurement port, which is then compared directly with the appropriate specification limit under software control of the test receivers and spectrum analyzers. This provides added accuracy since all site correction factors, such as cable loss and antenna factors are added automatically. LINE IMPEDANCE STABILIZATION NETWORK (LISN) Line conducted emission measurements utilize a fifty micro-Henry Line Impedance Stabilization Network as the monitoring point. The LISN used also contains a 250-uH CISPR adapter. This network provides for calibrated radio-frequency noise measurements by the design of the internal low-pass and high-pass filters on the EUT and measurement ports, respectively. IMPEDANCE STABILIZATION NETWORK (ISN) Telecommunication port conducted emission measurements utilize an Impedance Stabilization Network with a 150-ohm termination impedance and specific longitudinal conversion loss as the voltage monitoring point. This network provides for calibrated radio-frequency noise measurements by the design of the internal circuitry on the EUT and measurement ports, respectively. For current measurements, a current probe with a uniform frequency response and less than 1-ohm insertion impedance is used. FILTERS/ATTENUATORS External filters and precision attenuators are often connected between the receiving antenna or LISN and the receiver. This eliminates saturation effects and non-linear operation due to high-amplitude transient events. File: R85059 Page 10

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 ANTENNAS A bilog antenna or combination of biconnical and log periodic antennas are used to cover the range from 30 MHz to 1000 MHz. Narrowband tuned dipole antennas may be used over the entire 30 to 1000 MHz frequency range for precision measurements of field strength. Above 1000 MHz, horn antennas are used. The antenna calibration factors are included in site factors that are programmed into the test receivers or data collection software. ANTENNA MAST AND EQUIPMENT TURNTABLE The antennas used to measure the radiated electric field strength are mounted on a non- conductive antenna mast equipped with a motor drive to vary the antenna height. ANSI C63.4, CISPR 22 and KN22 specify that the test height above ground for table- mounted devices shall be 80 centimeters. Floor-mounted equipment shall be placed on the ground plane if the device is normally used on a conductive floor or separated from the ground plane by insulating material up to 12-mm thick if the device is normally used on a non-conductive floor. During radiated measurements, the EUT is positioned on a motorized turntable in conformance with this requirement. INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION All test equipment is regularly checked to ensure that performance is maintained in accordance with the company's specifications. An appendix of this report contains the list of test equipment used and calibration information. File: R85059 Page 11

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 EMISSIONS TEST PROCEDURES EUT AND CABLE PLACEMENT The standards require that interconnecting cables be connected to the available ports of the unit and that the placement of the unit and the attached cables simulate the worst case orientation that can be expected from a typical installation, so far as practicable. To this end, the position of the unit and associated cabling is varied within the guidelines of ANSI C63.4, CISPR 22 and KN22, and the worst-case orientation is used for final measurements. CONDUCTED EMISSIONS (MAINS) Conducted emissions are measured at the plug end of the power cord supplied with the EUT. Excess power cord length is wrapped in a bundle between 30 and 40 centimeters in length near the center of the cord. Preliminary measurements are made to determine the highest-amplitude emission relative to the specification limit for all the modes of operation. Placement of system components and varying of cable positions are performed in each mode. A final peak-mode scan is then performed in the position and mode for which the highest emission was noted on all current carrying conductors of the power cord. Emissions that have peak values close to the specification limit are also measured in the quasi-peak and average detection modes to determine compliance except when the amplitude of the emission when measured with the quasi-peak detector is more than 10 dB below the specification limit for average measurements. In this case only quasi-peak measurements are performed. File: R85059 Page 12

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 RADIATED EMISSIONS (SEMI-ANECHOIC and/or OATS TEST ENVIRONMENT) Radiated emissions measurements in a semi-anechoic environment are performed in two phases (preliminary scan and final maximization). Final maximization may be performed on an OATS. Preliminary Scan A preliminary scan of emissions is conducted in which all significant EUT frequencies are identified with the system in a nominal configuration. At least two scans are performed from 30 MHz up to the frequency required by the regulations specified on page 1. One or more of these are performed with the antenna polarized vertically and one or more of these are performed with the antenna polarized horizontally. During the preliminary scans, the EUT is rotated through 360°, the antenna height is varied and cable positions are varied to determine the highest emission relative to the limit. A speaker is provided in the receiver to aid in discriminating between EUT and ambient emissions if required. Other methods used during the preliminary scan for EUT emissions involve scanning with near-field magnetic loops, monitoring I/O cables with RF current clamps, and cycling power to the EUT. Final Maximization During final maximization, the highest-amplitude emissions identified in the spectral search are viewed while the EUT azimuth angle is varied from 0 to 360 degrees relative to the receiving antenna. The azimuth that results in the highest emission is then maintained while varying the antenna height from one to four meters. The result is the identification of the highest amplitude for each of the highest peaks. Each recorded level is corrected in the receiver using appropriate factors for cables, connectors, antennas, and preamplifier gain. Emissions that have values close to the specification limit may also be measured with a tuned dipole antenna to determine compliance. For measurements above 1GHz every effort is made to ensure the EUT remains within the cone of radiation of the measurement antenna (i.e. 3dB beam-width of the antenna). This may include rotating the product and/or angling the measurement antenna. When Testing above 18 GHz, the receive antenna is located at 1 meter from the EUT and the antenna height is restricted to a maximum of 2.5m. Maximum emissions are found within this restricted range because emission levels decrease over distance and as the antenna is raised above 2.5m, the distance from the EUT increases. As a result of the increased measurement distance, at antenna heights above 2.5m, lower emission levels are measured as compared to emissions levels measured at antenna heights at 2.5m and below. File: R85059 Page 13

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS SAMPLE CALCULATIONS - CONDUCTED EMISSIONS Receiver readings are compared directly to the conducted emissions specification limit (decibel form). The calculation is as follows: Rr - S = M where: Rr = Receiver Reading in dBuV S = Specification Limit in dBuV M = Margin to Specification in +/- dB SAMPLE CALCULATIONS - RADIATED EMISSIONS Receiver readings are compared directly to the specification limit (decibel form). The receiver internally corrects for cable loss, preamplifier gain, and antenna factor. The calculations are in the reverse direction of the actual signal flow, thus cable loss is added and the amplifier gain is subtracted. The Antenna Factor converts the voltage at the antenna coaxial connector to the field strength at the antenna elements. A distance factor, when used for electric field measurements, is calculated by using the following formula: Fd = 20*LOG10 (Dm/Ds) where: Fd = Distance Factor in dB Dm = Measurement Distance in meters Ds = Specification Distance in meters Measurement Distance is the distance at which the measurements were taken and Specification Distance is the distance at which the specification limits are based. The Antenna Factor converts the voltage at the antenna coaxial connector to the field strength at the antenna elements. The margin of a given emission peak relative to the limit is calculated as follows: Rc = Rr + Fd and M = Rc - Ls where: Rr = Receiver Reading in dBuV/m Fd = Distance Factor in dB Rc = Corrected Reading in dBuV/m Ls = Specification Limit in dBuV/m M = Margin in dB Relative to Spec File: R85059 Page 14

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 Appendix A Test Equipment Calibration Data Radiated Emissions, 30 - 1,000 MHz, 06-Oct-11 Manufacturer Description Model Asset # Cal Due Rohde & Schwarz EMI Test Receiver, 20 Hz-7 GHz ESIB7 1630 4/13/2012 Sunol Sciences Biconilog, 30-3000 MHz JB3 2237 7/14/2012 Com-Power Corp. Preamplifier, 30-1000 MHz PAM-103 2380 4/13/2012 Conducted Emissions - AC Power Ports, 07-Oct-11 Manufacturer Description Model Asset # Cal Due EMCO LISN, 10 kHz-100 MHz, 25A 3825/2 1292 3/1/2012 Rohde & Schwarz Pulse Limiter ESH3 Z2 1401 4/21/2012 Rohde & Schwarz EMI Test Receiver, 20 Hz-7 GHz ESIB7 1630 4/13/2012 Fischer Custom LISN, 25A, 150kHz to 30MHz, FCC-LISN-50-25-2- 2001 9/15/2012 Comm 25 Amp, 09 File: R85059 Page 15

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 Appendix B Test Data T84600 Pages 17 - 25 File: R85059 Page 16

EMC Test Data Client: Intel Corporation Job Number: J84366 Model: Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 T-Log Number: T84600 Account Manager: Christine Krebill Contact: Steve Hackett - Emissions Standard(s): FCC 15.247 Class: B Immunity Standard(s): - Environment: - EMC Test Data For The Intel Corporation Model Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 Date of Last Test: 10/19/2011 R85059 Cover Page 17

EMC Test Data Client: Intel Corporation Job Number: J84366 T-Log Number: T84600 Model: Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 Account Manager: Christine Krebill Contact: Steve Hackett Standard: FCC 15.247 Class: B Conducted Emissions (Elliott Laboratories Fremont Facility, Semi-Anechoic Chamber) Test Specific Details Objective: The objective of this test session is to perform final qualification testing of the EUT with respect to the specification listed above. Date of Test: 10/6/2011 Config. Used: 1 Test Engineer: Vishal Narayan Config Change: None Test Location: Fremont Chamber #3 EUT Voltage: 120V/60Hz and 230V/50Hz General Test Configuration For tabletop equipment, the EUT was located on a wooden table inside the semi-anechoic chamber, 40 cm from a vertical coupling plane and 80cm from the LISN. A second LISN was used for all local support equipment. Remote support equipment was located outside of the semi-anechoic chamber. Any cables running to remote support equipment where routed through metal conduit and when possible passed through a ferrite clamp upon exiting the chamber. Ambient Conditions: Temperature: 20 °C Rel. Humidity: 41 % Summary of Results Run # Test Performed Limit Result Margin 1 CE, AC Power, 230V/50Hz Class B Pass 57.1dBµV @ 0.168MHz (-8.0dB) 2 CE, AC Power,120V/60Hz Class B Pass 62.0dBµV @ 0.154MHz (-3.8dB) Modifications Made During Testing No modifications were made to the EUT during testing Deviations From The Standard No deviations were made from the requirements of the standard. R85059 CE Power 07-Oct-11 Page 18

EMC Test Data Client: Intel Corporation Job Number: J84366 T-Log Number: T84600 Model: Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 Account Manager: Christine Krebill Contact: Steve Hackett Standard: FCC 15.247 Class: B Run #1: AC Power Port Conducted Emissions, 0.15 - 30MHz, 230V/50Hz R85059 CE Power 07-Oct-11 Page 19

EMC Test Data Client: Intel Corporation Job Number: J84366 T-Log Number: T84600 Model: Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 Account Manager: Christine Krebill Contact: Steve Hackett Standard: FCC 15.247 Class: B Continuation of Run #1 Preliminary peak readings captured during pre-scan (peak readings vs. average limit) Frequency Level AC Class B Detector Comments MHz dBμV Line Limit Margin QP/Ave 0.168 59.5 Neutral 55.0 4.5 Peak 0.169 58.2 Line 54.9 3.3 Peak 0.153 55.8 Neutral 55.7 0.1 Peak 0.187 54.1 Line 54.3 -0.2 Peak 0.245 51.4 Neutral 51.9 -0.5 Peak 0.241 49.2 Line 52.1 -2.9 Peak 0.553 34.5 Line 46.0 -11.5 Peak 0.557 33.0 Neutral 46.0 -13.0 Peak Final quasi-peak and average readings Frequency Level AC Class B Detector Comments MHz dBμV Line Limit Margin QP/Ave 0.168 57.1 Neutral 65.1 -8.0 QP QP (1.00s) 0.169 56.8 Line 65.0 -8.2 QP QP (1.00s) 0.153 54.5 Neutral 65.8 -11.3 QP QP (1.00s) 0.187 52.3 Line 64.2 -11.9 QP QP (1.00s) 0.168 40.7 Neutral 55.1 -14.4 AVG AVG (0.10s) 0.245 47.4 Neutral 61.9 -14.5 QP QP (1.00s) 0.169 39.6 Line 55.0 -15.4 AVG AVG (0.10s) 0.241 46.4 Line 62.1 -15.7 QP QP (1.00s) 0.153 36.0 Neutral 55.8 -19.8 AVG AVG (0.10s) 0.187 32.9 Line 54.2 -21.3 AVG AVG (0.10s) 0.245 30.1 Neutral 51.9 -21.8 AVG AVG (0.10s) 0.241 28.2 Line 52.1 -23.9 AVG AVG (0.10s) 0.557 29.9 Neutral 56.0 -26.1 QP QP (1.00s) 0.553 29.1 Line 56.0 -26.9 QP QP (1.00s) 0.553 13.7 Line 46.0 -32.3 AVG AVG (0.10s) 0.557 12.7 Neutral 46.0 -33.3 AVG AVG (0.10s) R85059 CE Power 07-Oct-11 Page 20

EMC Test Data Client: Intel Corporation Job Number: J84366 T-Log Number: T84600 Model: Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 Account Manager: Christine Krebill Contact: Steve Hackett Standard: FCC 15.247 Class: B Run #2: AC Power Port Conducted Emissions, 0.15 - 30MHz, 120V/60Hz R85059 CE Power 07-Oct-11 Page 21

EMC Test Data Client: Intel Corporation Job Number: J84366 T-Log Number: T84600 Model: Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 Account Manager: Christine Krebill Contact: Steve Hackett Standard: FCC 15.247 Class: B Continuation of Run #2 Preliminary peak readings captured during pre-scan (peak readings vs. average limit) Frequency Level AC Class B Detector Comments MHz dBμV Line Limit Margin QP/Ave 0.164 64.1 Line 55.3 8.8 Peak 0.168 63.4 Neutral 55.0 8.4 Peak 0.154 63.8 Neutral 55.7 8.1 Peak 0.152 58.9 Line 55.9 3.0 Peak 0.178 57.0 Neutral 54.6 2.4 Peak 0.204 55.4 Neutral 53.4 2.0 Peak 0.197 55.6 Line 53.6 2.0 Peak 0.226 52.5 Line 52.6 -0.1 Peak Final quasi-peak and average readings Frequency Level AC Class B Detector Comments MHz dBμV Line Limit Margin QP/Ave 0.154 62.0 Neutral 65.8 -3.8 QP QP (1.00s) 0.152 61.9 Line 65.9 -4.0 QP QP (1.00s) 0.164 60.2 Line 65.3 -5.1 QP QP (1.00s) 0.168 57.9 Neutral 65.1 -7.2 QP QP (1.00s) 0.154 44.2 Neutral 55.8 -11.6 AVG AVG (0.10s) 0.204 51.6 Neutral 63.4 -11.8 QP QP (1.00s) 0.197 51.3 Line 63.7 -12.4 QP QP (1.00s) 0.178 52.1 Neutral 64.6 -12.5 QP QP (1.00s) 0.226 49.7 Line 62.6 -12.9 QP QP (1.00s) 0.152 42.9 Line 55.9 -13.0 AVG AVG (0.10s) 0.168 39.8 Neutral 55.1 -15.3 AVG AVG (0.10s) 0.197 34.0 Line 53.7 -19.7 AVG AVG (0.10s) 0.226 32.2 Line 52.6 -20.4 AVG AVG (0.10s) 0.164 34.8 Line 55.3 -20.5 AVG AVG (0.10s) 0.178 33.6 Neutral 54.6 -21.0 AVG AVG (0.10s) 0.204 31.2 Neutral 53.4 -22.2 AVG AVG (0.10s) R85059 CE Power 07-Oct-11 Page 22

EMC Test Data Client: Intel Corporation Job Number: J84366 T-Log Number: T84600 Model: Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 Account Manager: Christine Krebill Contact: Steve Hackett Standard: FCC 15.247 Class: B Radiated Emissions (Elliott Laboratories Fremont Facility, Semi-Anechoic Chamber) Test Specific Details Objective: The objective of this test session is to perform final qualification testing of the EUT with respect to the specification listed above. Date of Test: 10/6/2011 Config. Used: 1 Test Engineer: Vishal Narayan Config Change: None Test Location: Fremont Chamber #3 EUT Voltage: 230V/50Hz General Test Configuration The EUT and any local support equipment were located on the turntable for radiated emissions testing. Any remote support equipment was located outside the semi-anechoic chamber. Any cables running to remote support equipment where routed through metal conduit and when possible passed through a ferrite clamp upon exiting the chamber. The test distance and extrapolation factor (if applicable) are detailed under each run description. Note, preliminary testing indicates that the emissions were maximized by orientation of the EUT and elevation of the measurement antenna. Maximized testing indicated that the emissions were maximized by orientation of the EUT, elevation of the measurement antenna, and manipulation of the EUT's interface cables. Ambient Conditions: Temperature: 20 °C Rel. Humidity: 41 % Summary of Results Run # Test Performed Limit Result Margin Radiated Emissions 37.9dBµV/m @ 399.46MHz 1 Class B Pass 30 - 1000 MHz, Preliminary (-8.1dB) Radiated Emissions 39.3dBµV/m @ 398.59MHz 2 Class B Pass 30 - 1000 MHz, Maximized (-6.7dB) Modifications Made During Testing No modifications were made to the EUT during testing Deviations From The Standard No deviations were made from the requirements of the standard. R85059 RE 06-Oct-11 Page 23

EMC Test Data Client: Intel Corporation Job Number: J84366 T-Log Number: T84600 Model: Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 Account Manager: Christine Krebill Contact: Steve Hackett Standard: FCC 15.247 Class: B Run #1: Preliminary Radiated Emissions, 30 - 1000 MHz Frequency Range Test Distance Limit Distance Extrapolation Factor 30 - 1000 MHz 3 3 0.0 R85059 RE 06-Oct-11 Page 24

EMC Test Data Client: Intel Corporation Job Number: J84366 T-Log Number: T84600 Model: Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 2200 Account Manager: Christine Krebill Contact: Steve Hackett Standard: FCC 15.247 Class: B Continuation of Run #1 Preliminary peak readings captured during pre-scan Frequency Level Pol FCC Class B Detector Azimuth Height Comments MHz dBμV/m v/h Limit Margin Pk/QP/Avg degrees meters 399.346 43.9 V 46.0 -2.1 Peak 109 1.0 411.410 36.3 V 46.0 -9.7 Peak 193 1.0 479.980 35.5 H 46.0 -10.5 Peak 140 1.5 71.999 29.2 V 40.0 -10.8 Peak 117 1.0 929.327 35.1 H 46.0 -10.9 Peak 132 1.0 144.958 31.3 V 43.5 -12.2 Peak 191 1.0 153.377 31.3 V 43.5 -12.2 Peak 334 1.0 198.980 30.9 H 43.5 -12.6 Peak 69 2.0 39.144 25.6 V 40.0 -14.4 Peak 249 1.0 Preliminary quasi-peak readings (no manipulation of EUT interface cables) Frequency Level Pol FCC Class B Detector Azimuth Height Comments MHz dBμV/m v/h Limit Margin Pk/QP/Avg degrees meters 399.459 37.9 V 46.0 -8.1 QP 107 1.0 QP (1.00s) 479.980 35.6 H 46.0 -10.4 QP 138 1.5 QP (1.00s) 929.327 29.7 H 46.0 -16.3 QP 130 1.0 QP (1.00s) 71.999 23.7 V 40.0 -16.3 QP 116 1.0 QP (1.00s) 144.958 26.5 V 43.5 -17.0 QP 191 1.0 QP (1.00s) 39.144 22.7 V 40.0 -17.3 QP 249 1.0 QP (1.00s) 153.377 26.0 V 43.5 -17.5 QP 332 1.0 QP (1.00s) 198.980 25.4 H 43.5 -18.1 QP 67 2.0 QP (1.00s) 411.410 27.5 V 46.0 -18.5 QP 109 1.0 QP (1.00s) Run #2: Maximized Readings From Run #1 Maximized quasi-peak readings (includes manipulation of EUT interface cables) Frequency Level Pol FCC Class B Detector Azimuth Height Comments MHz dBμV/m v/h Limit Margin Pk/QP/Avg degrees meters 398.589 39.3 V 46.0 -6.7 QP 171 1.0 QP (1.00s) 479.980 35.6 H 46.0 -10.4 QP 138 1.5 QP (1.00s) 929.327 29.7 H 46.0 -16.3 QP 130 1.0 QP (1.00s) 71.999 23.7 V 40.0 -16.3 QP 116 1.0 QP (1.00s) 144.958 26.5 V 43.5 -17.0 QP 191 1.0 QP (1.00s) 39.144 22.7 V 40.0 -17.3 QP 249 1.0 QP (1.00s) R85059 RE 06-Oct-11 Page 25

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 Appendix C Product Labeling Requirements The following information has been provided to clarify notification, equipment labeling requirements and information that must be included in the operator's manual. These requirements may be found in the standards/regulations listed in the scope of this report. Label Location The required label(s) must be in a conspicuous location on the product, which is defined as any location readily visible to the user of the device without the use of tools. Label Attachment The label(s) must be permanently attached to the product, which is defined as attached such that it can normally be expected to remain fastened to the equipment during the equipment's expected useful life. A paper gum label will generally not meet this condition. United States Class B Label FCC ID: ABC1234567 This device complies with Part 15 of FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. The FCC Identifier is comprised of the grantee code (in the example above ABC) that was assigned by the FCC plus a unique alpha-numeric specific to the product being certified. The ID must appear on the device. If the device is too small or for such use that it is not practicable to place the US label statement on it, the statement shall be placed in a prominent location in the instruction manual or pamphlet supplied to the user or, alternatively, shall be placed on the container in which the device is marketed Industry Canada For ICES-003 (digital apparatus), the product must be labeled with a notice indicating compliance e.g. This Class B digital apparatus complies with Canadian ICES-003 Cet appareil numérique de la classe B est conforme à la norme NMB-003 du Canada If there is limited space on the product then the text may be placed in the manual: File: R85059 Page 26

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 Appendix D User Manual Regulatory Statements Where special accessories, such as shielded cables, are required in order to meet the emission limits, appropriate instructions regarding the need to use such accessories must be contained on the first page of text concerned with the installation of the device in the operator's manual. A requirement by FCC regulations, and recommended for all regulatory markets, is a cautionary statement to the end user that changes or modifications to the device not expressly approved by you, the manufacturer, could void their right to operate the equipment. United States Class B Manual Statement NOTE: This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class B digital device pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference in a residential installation. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instructions, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. However, there is no guarantee that interference will not occur in a particular installation. If this equipment does cause harmful interference to radio or television reception, which can be determined by turning the equipment off and on, the user is encouraged to try and correct the interference by one or more of the following measures: -Reorient or relocate the receiving antenna. -Increase the separation between the equipment and the receiver. -Connect the equipment into an outlet on a circuit different from that to which the receiver is connected. -Consult the dealer or an experienced radio/TV technician for help. Note: Additional information about corrective measures may also be provided to the user at the company's option. The FCC has indicated that the radio interference statement be bound in the same manner as the operator's manual. Thus, a loose-leaf insert page in a bound or center-spine and stapled manual would not meet this condition. File: R85059 Page 27

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 Appendix E Basic and Reference Standards Subpart B of Part 15 of FCC Rules for digital devices. FCC Part 15 Subpart B references the use of ANSI C63.4–2003: “Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz” for the purposes of evaluating the radiated and conducted emissions from digital devices. File: R85059 Page 28

Elliott Laboratories -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 21, 2011 End of Report This page is intentionally blank and marks the last page of this test report. File: R85059 Page 29


Document Created: 2011-10-21 13:55:18
Document Modified: 2011-10-21 13:55:18
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC