Al Near Field Measurement

FCC ID: PD918265NG

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_3778495

TEST REPORT EUT Description Wireless Module installed in 2 in 1 PC/Tablet Brand Name Intel® Model 18265 inside Dell Model P73G Model Name 18265NGW FCC/IC ID FCC ID: PD918265NG/IC ID: 1000M-18265NG Date of Test Start/End 2017-11-24 / 2017-12-01 WiGig + 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wireless LAN + BDR/EDR 2.1 + BLE 4.2 Features (see section 5) Applicant Intel Mobile Communications Address 100 Center Point Circle, Suite 200 / Columbia, SC 29210 / United States Contact Person Steven Hackett Telephone/Fax/ Email steven.c.hackett@intel.com FCC 47 CFR Part §2.1093 Reference Standards FCC 47 CFR Part §15.255(f) (see section 1) RF Exposure Environment Portable devices - General population/uncontrolled exposure Test separation distance 5 mm (from probe sensor to evaluation plane) Test Report identification 161114-01.TR01 Revision Control This test report revision replaces any previous test report revision (see section 8) The test results relate only to the samples tested. The test report shall not be reproduced in full, without written approval of the laboratory. Intel Mobile Communications France S.A.S – WRF Lab 425 rue de Goa – Le Cargo B6 - 06600, Antibes, France Tel. +33493001400 / Fax +33493001401 FO-011_TestReport161122 1 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 Table of Contents 1. Standards, reference documents and applicable test methods ......................................................................... 3 2. General conditions, competences and guarantees ............................................................................................. 3 3. Environmental Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 3 4. Test samples ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 5. EUT Features ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 6. Remarks and comments ......................................................................................................................................... 5 7. Associated Documents ........................................................................................................................................... 5 8. Document Revision History .................................................................................................................................... 5 Test & System Description ....................................................................................................................... 6 A.1 POWER DENSITY DEFINITION ................................................................................................................................. 6 A.2 SPEAG FREE SPACE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ....................................................................................................... 6 A.2.1 Measurement Setup .................................................................................................................................................... 6 A.2.2 E-Field Measurement Probe ........................................................................................................................................ 7 A.2.3 Worst Case Linearization Error.................................................................................................................................... 8 A.2.4 Data Evaluation ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 A.3 SYSTEM CHECK .................................................................................................................................................. 10 A.4 TEST EQUIPMENT LIST ........................................................................................................................................ 11 A.4.1 System #2.................................................................................................................................................................. 11 A.4.2 Shared Equipment ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 A.5 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION ......................................................................................................... 12 Test Results ............................................................................................................................................. 13 B.1 TEST CONDITIONS............................................................................................................................................... 13 B.1.1 Test signal, Output power and Test Frequencies ...................................................................................................... 13 B.1.2 Measurement configuration ....................................................................................................................................... 13 B.2 SYSTEM CHECK MEASUREMENTS ........................................................................................................................ 13 B.3 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................... 14 Test System Plots.................................................................................................................................... 15 Photographs ............................................................................................................................................ 24 D.1 TEST SETUP ....................................................................................................................................................... 24 D.2 TEST SAMPLE ..................................................................................................................................................... 25 Calibration Certificates ........................................................................................................................... 26 FO-011_TestReport161122 2 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 1. Standards, reference documents and applicable test methods 1. FCC 47 CFR Part §2.1093 – Radiofrequency radiation exposure evaluation: portable devices. 2. FCC 47 CFR Part 15 – Subpart C – §15.255 Operation within the band 57-64 GHz. 3. SPEAG Application Note – 5G Compliance Testing with DASY6 (5GModule V1.0Beta) 2. General conditions, competences and guarantees  Intel Mobile Communications France SAS Wireless RF Lab (Intel WRF Lab) is a testing laboratory competent to perform this testing.  Intel WRF Lab only provides testing services and is committed to providing reliable, unbiased test results and interpretations.  Intel WRF Lab is liable to the client for the maintenance of the confidentiality of all information related to the item under test and the results of the test.  Intel WRF Lab has developed calibration and proficiency programs for its measurement equipment to ensure correlated and reliable results to its customers.  This report is only referred to the item that has undergone the test.  This report does not imply an approval of the product by the Certification Bodies or competent Authorities. 3. Environmental Conditions  At the site where the measurements were performed the following limits were not exceeded during the tests: Temperature 21ºC ± 1ºC Humidity 30% ± 10% 4. Test samples Sample Control # Description Model Serial # Date of receipt Note Wireless Module 18265NGW inside 161114-01.S03 installed in N/A 2016-12-12 NA P73G conventional laptop #01 CN-06C3W2- 161114-01.S04 AC Adapter NA 72438-69N- 2016-12-12 NA 0B54-A03 5. EUT Features Brand Name Intel® Model 18265 inside Dell Model P73G Model Name 18265NGW FCC/IC ID FCC ID: PD918265NG/IC ID: 1000M-18265NG Software Version 1.9.0-04603 Prototype / Production Production Host Identification P73G series Exposure Conditions Localized free space power density WiGig 60GHz (57.24 – 63.72 GHz) 802.11b/g/n 2.4GHz (2400.0 – 2483.5 MHz) 802.11a/n/ac 5.2GHz (5150.0 – 5250.0 MHz) Supported Radios 5.3GHz (5250.0 – 5350.0 MHz) 5.6GHz (5470.0 – 5725.0 MHz) 5.8GHz (5725.0 – 5825.0 MHz) Bluetooth 2.4GHz (2400.0 – 2483.5 MHz) Antenna Information RFEM3 (10101RRFW) FO-011_TestReport161122 3 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents


Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 6. Remarks and comments 1. Per the location of the active antenna array (a.k.a. RFEM3) in the Dell model P73G platform, the distance between the antenna arrays to the body of an end user, at the closest contact point, will be in the near-field. 2. In order to prove that during typical use the energy goes in most cases away from the human body, several tests of beamforming behavior were performed under different use case conditions. The results are presented in the associated document [2]. 3. These tests are supported by a determination of the near-field average power density performed using an EM simulation supported by a near-field measurement. An EM simulation that includes the RFEM 3 transmitter model embedded inside the Dell model P73G is used to determine the worst case configuration and the correspondent near-field power density. This worst case power density which is a conservative case considering that the energy is always oriented toward the human body is also supported by a near-field measurement. The simulation method is described in associated document [2]. The simulation results and the near-field measurement results are described in [3]. 7. Associated Documents [1] 161114-Dell P73G - Theory of Operation Report [2] 161114-Dell P73G - MPE Simulation Report [3] 161114-Dell P73G - Simulations and Measurements Comparisons and Compliance Descriptions Report 8. Document Revision History Revision # Date Modified by Revision Details Rev. 00 2017-12-04 I. Kharrat First Issue Rev. 01 2018-01-19 K. RIDA Revision 01 according to FCC comments FO-011_TestReport161122 5 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 Test & System Description A.1 Power Density Definition The power density for an electromagnetic field represents the rate of energy transfer per unit area. The local power density (i.e. Poynting vector) at a given spatial point is deduced from electromagnetic fields by the following formula: 1 ⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗ 𝑃𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑙 = Re ( 𝐸⃗ × 𝐻⃗ ∗) 2 Where 𝐸⃗ is the complex electric field peak phasor and 𝐻 ⃗ ∗ is the complex conjugate magnetic field peak phasor. This power density is also called “single-point” or “spot power density”. Considering that the FCC’s Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit is applicable on the average power density inside 1cm2 area, the single point power densities in the evaluation plane should be averaged inside the 1cm 2 area. A.2 SPEAG free space Measurement System A.2.1 Measurement Setup The DASY6 system for performing compliance tests consists of the following items:  A standard high precision 6-axis robot (Staübli TX/RX family) with controller, teach pendant and software. It includes an arm extension for accommodating the data acquisition electronics (DAE)  An isotropic field probe optimized and calibrated for the targeted measurements.  A data acquisition electronics (DAE) which performs the signal amplification, signal multiplexing, AD-conversion, offset measurements, mechanical surface detection, collision detection, etc. The unit is battery powered with standard or rechargeable batteries. The signal is optically transmitted to the EOC.  The Electro-optical Converter (EOC) performs the conversion from optical to electrical signals for the digital communication to the DAE. The EOC signal is transmitted to the measurement server.  The function of the measurement server is to perform the time critical tasks such as signal filtering, control of the robot operation and fast movements interrupts.  The Light Beam used is for probe alignment. This improves the (absolute) accuracy of the probe positioning.  A computer running Win7 professional operating system and the cDASY6 software.  Remote control and teach pendant as well as additional circuitry for robot safety such as warning lamps, etc. FO-011_TestReport161122 6 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 A.2.2 E-Field Measurement Probe The probe consists of two dipoles (0.8 mm length) optimally arranged with different angles (γ1 and γ2) to obtain pseudo- vector information, printed on glass substrate protected by high density foam that allows low perturbation of the measured field. Three or more measurements are taken for different probe rotational angles, deriving the amplitude and polarization information. The probe’s characteristics are: Frequency Range 750 MHz – 110 GHz1 Length 320 mm Probe tip external diameter 8 mm Probe’s two dipoles length 0.9mm – Diode loaded Quartz 0.9 x 20 x 0.18mm Probe’s substrate (𝜀r=3.8) Distance between diode sensors 1.5 mm and probe’s tip Axial Isotropy ±0.6 dB Maximum operating E-field 3000 V/m Lower E-field detection threshold 5 V/m @ 60 GHz Minimum Mechanical separation 0.5mm between probe tip and a Surface Calibration reference point Diode Sensor 1 The probe calibration range is 750 MHz – 90 GHz FO-011_TestReport161122 7 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 A.2.3 Worst Case Linearization Error For continuously transmitting signals (100% duty cycle), the worst case linearization error is given by the difference between non linearized voltage and linearized voltage using CW parameters. The error is increasing with the voltage levels. In our particular case, the measured voltages averaged over the signal period are below 1mV. We use 1mV in the below calculation to have the worst case condition. The signal PAR (Peak to Average Ratio) is 6dB and the diode compression point 100mV. The maximum voltage through the diode is given by: vpeak = vmeas avg × PARlinear 𝑣𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘=1∗4=4 𝑚𝑉 The linearized voltage using CW parameter is given by: 2 𝑣𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 𝑣𝑙𝑖𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 = 𝑣𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 + 𝑑𝑖𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 42 𝑣𝑙𝑖𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 = 4 + = 4.16 𝑚𝑉 100 The worst case linearization error is: 𝑣𝑙𝑖𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 4.16 𝑙𝑖𝑛 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = = = 1.04 = 4% 𝑣 𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 4 FO-011_TestReport161122 8 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 A.2.4 Data Evaluation A.2.4.1 Scan The scan involves the measurement of two planes with three different probe rotations. The grid steps are optimized by the software based on the test frequency. The location of the lowest measurement plane is defined by the distance of first measurement layer from device under test (DUT) entered by the user. The DUT location settings can be used to offset the center of the grid. A.2.4.2 Total Field and Power Flux Density Reconstruction Computation of the power density in general requires knowledge of the electric (E-) and magnetic (H-) field amplitudes and phases in the plane of incidence. Reconstruction of these quantities from pseudo-vector E-field measurements is feasible, as they are constrained by Maxwell's equations. The reconstruction algorithm developed by the system manufacturer, together with the ability of the probe to measure extremely close to the source without perturbing the field, permits reconstruction of the E- and H-fields, as well as of the power density, on measurement planes located as near as 0.5mm away in the frequency band of 60 GHz. The average of the reconstructed power density is evaluated over a circular area in each measurement plane. The area of the circle is defined by the user; the default is 1 cm 2. FO-011_TestReport161122 9 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 A.3 System Check The system performance check verifies that the system operates within its specifications. System and operator errors can be detected and corrected. It is recommended that the system performance check be performed prior to any usage of the system in order to guarantee reproducible results. The system performance check uses normal E-field measurements in a simplified setup with a well characterized source. This setup was selected to give a high sensitivity to all parameters that might fail or vary over time. The system check does not intend to replace the calibration of the components, but indicates situations where the system uncertainty is exceeded due to drift or failure. In the simplified setup for system check, the EUT is replaced by a calibrated source and the power source is replaced by a controlled continuous wave generated by a signal generator. The calibrated source must be placed at the correct distance from the E-field probe according to the calibration certificate. First, the power meter is connected to the output of the signal generator to measure the forward power at the location of the connector to the system check source. The signal generator is adjusted for the desired forward power to match the system check source calibration setup at the connector as read by power meter. Then the power meter is replaced by the system check source. The output power on the reference source is set to 5.35 dBm (3.43 mW) and E-field results are normalized to a forward power of 10mW to compare the values with the calibration report. FO-011_TestReport161122 10 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 A.4 Test Equipment List A.4.1 System #2 ID# Device Type/Model Serial # Manufacturer Cal. Date Cal. Due Date cDASY6 5G 0638 Measurement SW module 9-5ED1AC01 SPEAG NA NA v1.0.0.12565 0636 Light Beam Unit LB5 / 80 1030 Di-Soric NA NA 0628 6-axis Robot TX60 L F17/RCB1/A/01 STAÜBLI NA NA Robot Remote P/N: SE UMS 032 0631 NA STAÜBLI NA NA Control AA Measurement 0632 Server SE UMS 028 BB 1547 SPEAG NA NA Electro-Optical 0633 EOC60 1104 SPEAG NA NA Converter E-field mm-Wave 0575 EUmmWV2 9354 SPEAG 2017-05-08 2018-05-08 Probe Data Acquisition 0657 DAE4 1519 SPEAG 2017-07-12 2018-07-12 Electronics 0658 5G Phantom 5G NA SPEAG NA NA 5G Phantom table 0635 Table NA SPEAG NA NA professional A.4.2 Shared Equipment ID# Device Type/Model Serial # Manufacturer Cal. Date Cal. Due Date Logger: 62180216 Temperature & TR-72NW-H + 0398 Sensor: TandD 2016-02-01 2018-02-01 Humidity Logger HHA-3151 0202622A Frequency Multiplier, 0427 SMZ75 101257 R&S N/A N/A 50GHz-75GHz 0309 Signal Generator SMB100A 178217 R&S 2017-03-10 2019-03-10 0012 Power Meter NRP2 101567 R&S N/A N/A 0014 Power Sensor NRP-Z57 101280 R&S 2017-04-25 2019-04-25 0590 Horn reference source PE9881-24 201715 Pasternack 2017-05-08 2019-05-08 FO-011_TestReport161122 11 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 A.5 Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation The system uncertainty evaluation is shown in the below table: Uncertainty Budget Based on IEC 62209 Standard Family (28 - 90 GHz range) Error Description Uncertainty Probability Div. (ci) Std. Unc. (vi) Value Distribution (±dB) veff (±dB) Measurement System Probe Calibration 0.43 N 1 1 0.43 ∞ Hemispherical Isotropy 0.60 R √3 1 0.35 ∞ Linearity 0.20 R √3 1 0.12 ∞ System Detection Limits 0.04 R √3 1 0.02 ∞ Modulation Response* 0.17 R √3 1 0.10 ∞ Readout Electronics 0.01 N 1 1 0.01 ∞ Response Time 0.03 R √3 1 0.02 ∞ Integration Time 0.11 R √3 1 0.06 ∞ RF Ambient Noise 0.04 R √3 1 0.02 ∞ RF Ambient Reflections 0.21 R √3 1 0.12 ∞ Probe Positioner 0.04 R √3 1 0.02 ∞ Probe Positioning 0.11 R √3 1 0.06 ∞ Savg Reconstruction 0.61 R √3 1 0.35 ∞ Test Sample Related Power Drift 0.57 R √3 1 0.33 ∞ Power Scaling 0.00 R √3 1 0.00 ∞ Combined Std. Uncertainty 0.77 ∞ Expanded Std. Uncertainty 1.54 * The modulation response contribution in A.5 is calculated according to 4% linearization error of A.2.3 by : Uncertainty Modulation Response (dB)= 10log(1+0.04)= 0.17 FO-011_TestReport161122 12 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 Test Results B.1 Test Conditions B.1.1 Test signal, Output power and Test Frequencies The device under test was an Intel 18265NGW WiGig module (FCC ID: PD918265NG), including an active antenna array, embedded inside the Dell model P73G. The device was put into operation by using an Intel Proprietary software (DRTU version 1.9.0-04603). B.1.2 Measurement configuration The measurements were performed at several distances from the evaluation plane (see Annex E) using the 4 worst cases power density configurations (see table below) found in the simulation among the 6 worst cases corresponding to three subsets (2 worst cases per subset). The simulation method is described in associated document [2]. The simulation results are presented in Annex D. Plane MCS index1 Measurement Scan Plane Subset Channel Worst-case position @ Duty Cycle Distance size [cm2] MCS 1 Case #1 Base plane 1 1 1 5 mm 4.23x4.23 @ 100% MCS 1 Case #2 Base plane 1 2 1 5 mm 4.23x4.23 @ 100% MCS 1 Case #3 Base plane 1 3 1 5 mm 4.23x4.23 @ 100% MCS 1 Case #4 Base plane 1 1 2 5 mm 4.23x4.23 @ 100% Case #5 MCS 1 Base plane 3 1 1 5 mm 4.23x4.23 @ 100% Case #6 MCS 1 Base plane 3 2 1 5 mm 4.23x4.23 @ 100% B.2 System Check Measurements Target E-field 2 Measured E-field 2 Deviation Frequency Signal Type Date (V/m) (V/m) (%) 60 GHz Continuous Wave 90.3 96.5 6.87 2017-11-24 The fields presented in the System Check Measurements table are RMS values normalized to 10 mW input power. Indeed, as indicated in the calibration certificate of the reference horn antenna (see Annex F), the maximum measured E-field value at 10 mm is 67.91 V/m with 7.53 dBm (5.66 mW) source power. This is equivalent to 90.3 V/m target E- field value showed in the table above normalized to 10 dBm (10 mW) source power. The system check measurement is performed at 5.35 3 dBm (3.43 mW) source power. The maximum measured E-field value is 56.5 V/m (see plot 7 in Annex C). This is equivalent to 96.5 V/m measured E-field value showed in the table above normalized to 10 dBm source power. 1 MCS1 Modulation and coding scheme uses π/2-BPSK modulation 2 Normalized to 10mW 3 5.35 dBm is the maximum power level of the mmW source power FO-011_TestReport161122 13 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 B.3 Test Results Max localized Spatially Distance Max E-Field Max H-Field Test case PD Averaged PD Plot # (mm) [V/m] [A/m] [mW/cm2] [mW/cm2] Case #1 5 71.1753 0.204 0.664 0.3925 1 Case #2 5 78.3291 0.2632 0.763 0.3756 2 Case #3 5 75.2339 0.186 0.69 0.2907 3 Case #4 5 70.7634 0.2206 0.7075 0.2946 4 Case #5 5 83.0713 0.1984 0.8084 0.2370 5 Case #6 5 76.9413 0.2441 0.8233 0.3132 6 All fields’ strength showed in the table are peak values. The measured PAPR level of the modulation used in the tests is 5 dB. The measurement distance correspond to the distance from the probe sensor and evaluation plane boundary. The figure in section A.2.2 illustrates the measurement distance of 2 mm. FO-011_TestReport161122 14 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 Test System Plots 1. Case # 1 – 5 mm distance from Evaluation plane……………………………………………………………... 16 2. Case # 2 – 5 mm distance from Evaluation plane……………………………………………………………... 17 3. Case # 3 – 5 mm distance from Evaluation plane……………………………………………………………... 18 4. Case # 4 – 5 mm distance from Evaluation plane……………………………………………………………... 19 5. Case # 5 – 5 mm distance from Evaluation plane……………………………………………………………... 20 6. Case # 6 – 5 mm distance from Evaluation plane……………………………………………………………... 21 7. System Check 60 GHz……………………………………………………………............................................... 22 FO-011_TestReport161122 15 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 1. Case # 1 – 5 mm distance from Evaluation plane DUT: Sample 161114-01.S03; Type: RFEM-3; Serial: N/A Communication System: UID 0, Wi-Gig (0); Communication System Band: 60 GHz; Frequency: 58320MHz; Communication System PAR: 0 dB Medium parameters used: σ = 0 S/m, εr = 1; ρ = 0 kg/m3 Phantom section: Table Section Measurement Standard: DASY6 (IEEE/IEC/ANSI C63.19-2011) DASY Configuration:  Probe: EUmmW - SN9354; ConvF(1, 1, 1); Calibrated: 2017-02-23; o Modulation Compensation:  Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface), z = 5 mm  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1519; Calibrated: 2017-07-12  Phantom: Cover; Type: SPEAG Phantom Cover;  cDASY6 5G Module V1.0.0.12565; Channel 1-Distance-5mm/Measure Sample 161114-01.S03 (42.3x42.3): Resolution = 1.28 mm Measured E-field Reconstructed H-field (from Measured E-field) Maximum value = 71.1753 V/m - Peak Maximum value = 0.2040 A/m - Peak Reconstructed localized free space power density Reconstructed Spatially Averaged power density Maximum value = 0.6640 mW/cm2 Maximum value = 0.3925 mW/cm2 FO-011_TestReport161122 16 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 2. Case # 2 – 5 mm distance from Evaluation plane DUT: Sample 161114-01.S03; Type: RFEM-3; Serial: N/A Communication System: UID 0, Wi-Gig (0); Communication System Band: 60 GHz; Frequency: 60480MHz; Communication System PAR: 0 dB Medium parameters used: σ = 0 S/m, εr = 1; ρ = 0 kg/m3 Phantom section: Table Section Measurement Standard: DASY6 (IEEE/IEC/ANSI C63.19-2011) DASY Configuration:  Probe: EUmmW - SN9354; ConvF(1, 1, 1); Calibrated: 2017-02-23; o Modulation Compensation:  Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface), z = 5 mm  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1519; Calibrated: 2017-07-12  Phantom: Cover; Type: SPEAG Phantom Cover;  cDASY6 5G Module V1.0.0.12565; Channel 2-Distance-5mm/Measure Sample 161114-01.S03 (42.3x42.3): Resolution = 1.24 mm Measured E-field Reconstructed H-field (from Measured E-field) Maximum value = 78.3291 V/m - Peak Maximum value = 0.2632 A/m - Peak Reconstructed localized free space power density Reconstructed Spatially Averaged power density Maximum value = 0.7630 mW/cm2 Maximum value = 0.3756 mW/cm2 FO-011_TestReport161122 17 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 3. Case # 3 – 5 mm distance from Evaluation plane DUT: Sample 161114-01.S03; Type: RFEM-3; Serial: N/A Communication System: UID 0, Wi-Gig (0); Communication System Band: 60 GHz; Frequency: 62640MHz; Communication System PAR: 0 dB Medium parameters used: σ = 0 S/m, εr = 1; ρ = 0 kg/m3 Phantom section: Table Section Measurement Standard: DASY6 (IEEE/IEC/ANSI C63.19-2011) DASY Configuration:  Probe: EUmmW - SN9354; ConvF(1, 1, 1); Calibrated: 2017-02-23; o Modulation Compensation:  Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface), z = 5 mm  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1519; Calibrated: 2017-07-12  Phantom: Cover; Type: SPEAG Phantom Cover;  cDASY6 5G Module V1.0.0.12565; Channel 3-Distance-5mm/Measure Sample 161114-01.S03 (42.3x42.3): Resolution = 1.19 mm Measured E-field Reconstructed H-field (from Measured E-field) Maximum value = 75.2339 V/m - Peak Maximum value = 0.1860 A/m - Peak Reconstructed localized free space power density Reconstructed Spatially Averaged power density Maximum value = 0.6900 mW/cm2 Maximum value = 0.2907 mW/cm2 FO-011_TestReport161122 18 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 4. Case # 4 – 5 mm distance from Evaluation plane DUT: Sample 161114-01.S03; Type: RFEM-3; Serial: N/A Communication System: UID 0, Wi-Gig (0); Communication System Band: 60 GHz; Frequency: 58320MHz; Communication System PAR: 0 dB Medium parameters used: σ = 0 S/m, εr = 1; ρ = 0 kg/m3 Phantom section: Table Section Measurement Standard: DASY6 (IEEE/IEC/ANSI C63.19-2011) DASY Configuration:  Probe: EUmmW - SN9354; ConvF(1, 1, 1); Calibrated: 2017-02-23; o Modulation Compensation:  Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface), z = 5 mm  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1519; Calibrated: 2017-07-12  Phantom: Cover; Type: SPEAG Phantom Cover;  cDASY6 5G Module V1.0.0.12565; Channel 1-Distance-5mm/Measure Sample 161114-01.S03 (42.3x42.3): Resolution = 1.28 mm Measured E-field Reconstructed H-field (from Measured E-field) Maximum value = 70.7634 V/m - Peak Maximum value = 0.2206 A/m - Peak Reconstructed localized free space power density Reconstructed Spatially Averaged power density Maximum value = 0.7075 mW/cm2 Maximum value = 0.2946 mW/cm2 FO-011_TestReport161122 19 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 5. Case # 5 – 5 mm distance from Evaluation plane DUT: Sample 161114-01.S03; Type: RFEM-3; Serial: N/A Communication System: UID 0, Wi-Gig (0); Communication System Band: 60 GHz; Frequency: 58320MHz; Communication System PAR: 0 dB Medium parameters used: σ = 0 S/m, εr = 1; ρ = 0 kg/m3 Phantom section: Table Section Measurement Standard: DASY6 (IEEE/IEC/ANSI C63.19-2011) DASY Configuration:  Probe: EUmmW - SN9354; ConvF(1, 1, 1); Calibrated: 2017-02-23; o Modulation Compensation:  Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface), z = 5 mm  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1519; Calibrated: 2017-07-12  Phantom: Cover; Type: SPEAG Phantom Cover;  cDASY6 5G Module V1.0.0.12565; Channel 1-Distance-5mm/Measure Sample 161114-01.S03 (42.3x42.3): Resolution = 1.28 mm Measured E-field Reconstructed H-field (from Measured E-field) Maximum value = 83.0713 V/m - Peak Maximum value = 0.1984 A/m - Peak Reconstructed localized free space power density Reconstructed Spatially Averaged power density Maximum value = 0.8084 mW/cm2 Maximum value = 0.2370 mW/cm2 FO-011_TestReport161122 20 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 6. Case # 6 – 5 mm distance from Evaluation plane DUT: Sample 161114-01.S03; Type: RFEM-3; Serial: N/A Communication System: UID 0, Wi-Gig (0); Communication System Band: 60 GHz; Frequency: 60480 MHz; Communication System PAR: 0 dB Medium parameters used: σ = 0 S/m, εr = 1; ρ = 0 kg/m3 Phantom section: Table Section Measurement Standard: DASY6 (IEEE/IEC/ANSI C63.19-2011) DASY Configuration:  Probe: EUmmW - SN9354; ConvF(1, 1, 1); Calibrated: 2017-02-23; o Modulation Compensation:  Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface), z = 5 mm  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1519; Calibrated: 2017-07-12  Phantom: Cover; Type: SPEAG Phantom Cover;  cDASY6 5G Module V1.0.0. 12565; Channel 2-Distance-5mm/Measure Sample 161114-01.S03 (42.3x42.3): Resolution = 1.24 mm Measured E-field Reconstructed H-field (from Measured E-field) Maximum value = 76.9413 V/m - Peak Maximum value = 0.2441 A/m - Peak Reconstructed localized free space power density Reconstructed Spatially Averaged power density Maximum value = 0.8233 mW/cm2 Maximum value = 0.3132 mW/cm2 FO-011_TestReport161122 21 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 7. System Check 60 GHz DUT: Horn reference source; Type: PE9881-24; Serial: 201715 Communication System: UID 0, Wi-Gig (0); Communication System Band: 60 GHz; Frequency: 60000 MHz; Communication System PAR: 0 dB Medium parameters used: σ = 0 S/m, εr = 1; ρ = 0 kg/m3 Phantom section: Table Section Measurement Standard: DASY6 (IEEE/IEC/ANSI C63.19-2011) DASY Configuration:  Probe: EUmmW - SN9354 ; ConvF(1, 1, 1); Calibrated: 2017-02-23; o Modulation Compensation:  Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface), z = 10 mm  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1519; Calibrated: 2017-07-12  Phantom: Cover; Type: SPEAG Phantom Cover;  cDASY6 5G Module V1.0.0. 12565; Distance-10mm/Measure Horn reference source (36x36): Resolution = 1.25 mm Maximum value measured: 56.5 V/m (RMS) for 5.35 dBm input power. The plots below show the comparison between the calibration certificate and the system check results in terms of normalized E-field distribution and the 1D variation along the two axis of the maximum. FO-011_TestReport161122 22 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 Calibration Certificate System Check - scan area: 30 mm x 16 mm - scan area:30 mm x 16 mm - Resolution: 1 mm - Resolution: 1 mm Field variation through the maximum along the E-field polarization Field variation through the maximum along the H-field polarization FO-011_TestReport161122 23 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 Photographs D.1 Test Setup Evaluation plane Position Measurement Setup FO-011_TestReport161122 24 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 D.2 Test Sample Sample #01 Laptop Front view Laptop Bottom view FO-011_TestReport161122 25 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 161114-01.TR01 Calibration Certificates ID Device Type/Model Serial Number Manufacturer E-field mm-Wave 0575 EUmmWV2 9354 SPEAG Probe Horn reference 0590 PE9881-24 201715 Pasternack source Calibration certificates are in attachment FO-011_TestReport161122 26 of 26 Printed copies are not controlled documents


Document Created: 2018-01-23 19:54:59
Document Modified: 2018-01-23 19:54:59
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC