RF Exposure SAR Report

FCC ID: PD9112BNHU

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_1243242

AT4 wireless, S.A. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 29590 Campanillas/ Málaga/ España Tel. 952 61 91 00 - Fax 952 61 91 13 MÁLAGA, C.I.F. A29 507 456 Registro Mercantil de Málaga,Tomo 1169, Libro 82, Folio 133, Hoja MA3729 TEST REPORT REFERENCE STANDARDS: FCC 47CFR Part 2.1093 FCC OET Bulletin 65, Supplement C (Edition 01-01) NIE........................................................ : 31131RET.002 Alejandro Llamas Firmado digitalmente por Alejandro Llamas Rodríguez Approved by A. Llamas / RF Lab. Manager Rodríguez Fecha: 2010.02.15 17:54:51 +01'00' (name / position & signature) ............... : .......................................................... Elaboration date .................................... : 2010-02-15 Identification of item tested ................ : Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 1000 inside a host laptop Trademark ............................................ : Intel Model and/or type reference ................. : USA: 112BNHMW / Canada: 112BNHU Serial number ........................................ : MAC: 001E6400F552 Other identification of the product ........ : FCC ID: PD9112BNHU / IC: 1000M-112BNHU Features ................................................. : 802.11 b/g/n Description ............................................ : Wireles Module: Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 1000 Antenna Type: WNC 25.91231.041 / 25.91231.031 Host platform: S10-3S Applicant ............................................. : Intel Corporation Address.................................................. : 2111 Ne 25th Avenue JF3-3-G14, Hillsboro, OR 97124, USA CIF/NIF/Passport................................... : --- Contact person: Steven C. Hackett (Wireless Regulatory Engineer) Telephone / Fax ..................................... : 803-216-2344 e-mail: ................................................... : steven.c.hackett@intel.com Test samples supplier ......................... : Same as applicant Manufacturer ...................................... : Same as applicant Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 1 of 33 2010-02-15

Test method requested ........................: See Standard Standard ................................................: 1. FCC 47 CFR Part 2.1093. Radiofrequency radiation exposure evaluation: portable devices. 2. FCC OET Bulletin 65, Supplement C (Edition 01-01), “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields”. 3. FCC OET KDB 248227 – SAR Measurements Procedures 802.11a/b/g Transmitters (May 2007 – Revised). 4. FCC OET KDB 616217 D03 – SAR Evaluation Considerations for Notebook/Netbook and Laptop Computers (November 2009). 5. FCC OET KDB 450824 – SAR Probe Calibration and System Verification Considerations for measurements at 150 MHz – 3 GHz (January 2007). Test procedure .......................................: Same as standards. Non-standardized test method ...............: N/A Used instrumentation .............................: 1. Dosimetric E-field probe SPEAG ES3DV3 2. Data acquisition device SPEAG DAE4 3. Electro-optical converter SPEAG EOC3 4. 2450 MHz dipole validation kit SPEAG D2450V2 5. Robot STÄUBLI RX60BL 6. Robot controller STÄUBLI CM7MB 7. Oval flat phantom SPEAG ELI 4 8. SAR measurement software SPEAG DASY4 V4.7 Build 80 9. Measurement server SPEAG DASY4 SE UMS 001 DC 10. Body Tissue Equivalent Liquids for 2450MHz band 11. Vector network analyzer Agilent E5071C 12. Dielectric probe kit Agilent 85070C 13. Power meter R&S NRVD 14. Power Sensor R&S NRV-Z51 15. Power Sensor R&S NRV-Z1 16. RF Generator Agilent ESG E4438C 17. Dual directional coupler NARDA FSCM 99899 18. Power amplifier MITEQ AMF-4D-00400600-50-30P 19. Laptop positioning extension SPEAG Laptop Holder Report template No. .............................: FDT08_11 IMPORTANT: No parts of this report may be reproduced or quoted out of context, in any form or by any means, except in full, without the previous written permission of AT4 wireless. Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 2 of 33 2010-02-15

INDEX Competences and guarantees ................................................................................................................ 4 General conditions ................................................................................................................................ 4 Uncertainty............................................................................................................................................ 4 Usage of samples................................................................................................................................... 5 Testing period ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Environmental conditions ..................................................................................................................... 5 Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Remarks and comments ........................................................................................................................ 6 Testing verdicts ..................................................................................................................................... 6 APPENDIX A: Test Configuration....................................................................................................... 7 APPENDIX B: Test results................................................................................................................. 15 APPENDIX C: Measurements Reports .............................................................................................. 20 APPENDIX D: Calibration Data ........................................................................................................ 24 APPENDIX E: Photographs ............................................................................................................... 31 Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 3 of 33 2010-02-15

Competences and guarantees AT4 wireless is a testing laboratory competent to carry out the tests described in this report. In order to assure the traceability to other national and international laboratories, AT4 wireless has a calibration and maintenance programme for its measurement equipment. AT4 wireless guarantees the reliability of the data presented in this report, which is the result of the measurements and the tests performed to the item under test on the date and under the conditions stated on the report and, it is based on the knowledge and technical facilities available at AT4 wireless at the time of performance of the test. AT4 wireless is liable to the client for the maintenance of the confidentiality of all information related to the item under test and the results of the test. General conditions 1. This report is only referred to the item that has undergone the test. 2. This report does not constitute or imply on its own an approval of the product by the Certification Bodies or competent Authorities. 3. This document is only valid if complete; no partial reproduction can be made without previous written permission of AT4 wireless. 4. This test report cannot be used partially or in full for publicity and/or promotional purposes without previous written permission of AT4 wireless and the Accreditation Bodies. Uncertainty Uncertainty (factor k=2) was calculated according to the following documents: 1. FCC OET Bulletin 65, Supplement C (Edition 01-01), “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields”. Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 4 of 33 2010-02-15

Usage of samples Samples undergoing test have been selected by: the client. Sample M/01 is composed of the following elements: Control Nº Description Model Serial Nº Date of reception ® ® 31131/02 WiFi module Intel Centrino Wireless- MAC Adress: 2010-02-10 inside a Laptop PC N 1000 / Laptop S10-3S / 001E6400F552 Yageo Antennas 1. Sample M/01 has undergone the test(s) specified in subclause “Test method requested”. Testing period The performed test started on 2010-02-11 and finished on the same day. The tests have been performed at AT4 wireless. Environmental conditions In the laboratory for measurements, the following limits were not exceeded during the test: Temperature Min. = 21.52 ºC Max. = 23.37 ºC Relative humidity Min. = 37.74 % Max. = 45.17 % Air pressure Min. = 1008 mbar Max. = 1010 mbar Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 5 of 33 2010-02-15

Summary Considering the results of the performed test according to FCC 47CFR Part 2.1093, the item under test is IN COMPLIANCE with the requested specifications specified in the standard. The maximum 1g volume averaged SAR found during this test has been 0.027 W/kg, for the 2450 MHz band and 802.11n with 20MHz BW mode. NOTE: The results presented in this Test Report apply only to the particular item under test established in page 1 of this document, as presented for test on the date(s) shown in section, “USAGE OF SAMPLES, TESTING PERIOD AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS”. Remarks and comments 1: 802.11n = 20MHz BW / 802.11n* = 40MHz BW. 2: Testing of 802.11g is not required due to the testing reductions mentioned in FCC OET KDB 248227 – SAR Measurements Procedures 802.11a/b/g Transmitters (May 2007 – Revised), paragraph “Frequency Channel Configurations”. 3: Testing of other channels in each band is optional when the maximum output channel SAR fulfills the testing reductions mentioned in FCC OET KDB 248227 – SAR Measurements Procedures 802.11a/b/g Transmitters (May 2007 – Revised), paragraph “Frequency Channel Configurations”. Testing verdicts Not applicable .................................................... : NA Pass..................................................................... : P Fail ..................................................................... : F Not measured...................................................... : NM 2450 MHz band FCC 47CFR Part 2.1093 Paragraph VERDICT NA P F NM (d)(2) 802.11b P (d)(2) 802.11g NM2 (d)(2) 802.11n1 P (d)(2) 802.11n*1 P 1 and 2: See Remarks and Comments. Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 6 of 33 2010-02-15

APPENDIX A: Test Configuration Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 7 of 33 2010-02-15

INDEX 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 9 1.1. Application Standard.............................................................................................................................. 9 1.2. General requirements ............................................................................................................................. 9 1.3. Measurement system and phantom requirements ................................................................................... 9 1.4. Measurement Liquids requirements. ...................................................................................................... 9 2. MEASUREMENT SYSTEM............................................................................................................... 10 2.1. Measurement System............................................................................................................................ 10 2.2. Test Positions of device relative to body.............................................................................................. 11 2.3. Test to be performed ............................................................................................................................ 11 2.4. Description of interpolation/extrapolation scheme............................................................................... 11 2.5. Determination of the largest peak spatial-average SAR ....................................................................... 11 2.6. System Validation ................................................................................................................................ 12 3. UNCERTAINTY ................................................................................................................................. 13 4. SAR LIMIT.......................................................................................................................................... 14 Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 8 of 33 2010-02-15

1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1. Application Standard The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) sets the limits for General Population / Uncontrolled exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields for transmitting devices designed to be used within 20 centimetres of the user body under FCC 47 CFR Part 2.1093 - “Radiofrequency radiation exposure evaluation: portable devices”, paragraph (d)(2). Specific requirements and procedure for SAR assessment are describe under FCC OET Bulletin 65, Supplement C (Edition 01-01), “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields”, and all the FCC OET Knowledge Database documents referred at the beginning of this document. 1.2. General requirements The SAR measurement has been performed continuing the following considerations and environment conditions: - The ambient temperature shall be in the range of 18ºC to 25ºC and the variation shall not exceed +/-2ºC during the test. - The ambient humidity shall be in the range of and 30% - 70%. - The device battery shall be fully charged before each measurement. 1.3. Measurement system and phantom requirements The measurement system used for SAR tests fulfils the procedural and technical requirements described at the reference standards used. The phantom is a simplified representation of the human anatomy and comprised of material with electrical properties similar to the corresponding tissues in human body. 1.4. Measurement Liquids requirements. The liquids used to simulate the human tissues, must fulfils the requirements of the dielectric properties required. These target dielectric properties per FCC OET KDB 450824 instructions come from the dipole and probe calibration data which are included in Appendix B, Section 2, of this document. As indicated in FCC OET KDB 450824, it is allowed a 5% variation of the above mentioned level at the 2450 MHz band. Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 9 of 33 2010-02-15

2. MEASUREMENT SYSTEM 2.1. Measurement System Manufacturer Device Type Schmid & Partner Dosimetric E-Fiel Probe ES3DV3 Engineering AG Schmid & Partner Data Acquisition DAE4 Engineering AG Electronics Schmid & Partner Electro-Optical EOC5 Engineering AG Converter Schmid & Partner 2450 MHz System D2450V2 Engineering AG Validation Dipole Stäubli Robot RX60BL Stäubli Robot controller CM7MB Schmid & Partner Oval flat phantom ELI 4 Engineering AG Schmid & Partner DASY V4.7 Build Measurement Software Engineering AG 80 Schmid & Partner DASY4 SE UMS Measurement Server Engineering AG 001 DC Vector Network Agilent E5071C Analyser Agilent Dielectric Probe Kit 85070C Rohde & Schwarz Power Meter NRVD Rohde & Schwarz Power Sensor NRV-Z51 Rohde & Schwarz Power Sensor NRV-Z1 Agilent RF Generator ESG E4438C NARDA Dual directional coupler FSCM 99899 AMF-4D-00400600- MITEQ Power amplifier 50-30P Schmid & Partner Laptop Holder SM LH1 001 AC Engineering AG Table 1: Measurement Equipment Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 10 of 33 2010-02-15

2.2. Test Positions of device relative to body The laptop device was tested in one position for all tests, with the bottom face placed directly against the phantom so the position of the laptop would be used (normal use condition). Further analysis was performed to determine the location which showed the highest SAR. The antennas on the laptop are located within the edge screen. According to FCC OET Bulletin 65 – Supplement C, the antennas which would applied in the test are antennas or radiating structures in direct contact with the user’s body within 20 centimetres of the body of a user under normal operating conditions. 2.3. Test to be performed In all operating modes and bands the measurements have to be performed on the “default test channels” defined at FCC OET KDB 248227 – SAR Measurements Procedures 802.11a/b/g Transmitters (May 2007 – Revised), except those channels defined as “required test channels” at the same document. 2.4. Description of interpolation/extrapolation scheme The local SAR inside the Phantom is measured using small dipole sensing elements inside a probe element. The probe tip must not be in contact with the Phantom’s surface in order to minimise measurement errors, but the highest local SAR is obtained from measurements at a certain distances from the shell trough extrapolation. The accurate assessment of the maximum SAR averaged over 1 gr. and 10 gr. requires a very fine resolution in the three dimensional scanned data array. Since the measurements have to be performed over a limited time, the measured data have to be interpolated to provide an array of sufficient resolution. The interpolation of 2D area scan is used after the initial area scan, at a fixed distance from the Phantom shell wall. The initial scan data is collected with a proper spatial resolution and this interpolation is used to find the location of the local maximum for positioning the subsequent 3D scanning to within a 1mm resolution. For the 3D scan, data is collected on a spatially regular 3D grid having 5mm steps in both lateral directions, and 5mm in depth direction for the 2450MHz band. After the data collection by the SAR probe, the data are extrapolated in the depth direction to assign values to points in the 3D array closer to the shell wall. A notional extrapolation value is also assigned to the first point outside the shell wall so that subsequent interpolation schemes will de applicable right up to the shell wall boundary. 2.5. Determination of the largest peak spatial-average SAR To determine the maximum value of the peak spatial-average SAR of a EUT, all device positions, configurations and operational modes should be tested for each frequency band. According to FCC 47 CFR Part 2.1093, the averaging volume shall be chosen as 1 g of contiguous tissue. The cubic volumes, over which the SAR measurements are averaged after extrapolation and interpolation, are chosen in order to include the highest values of local SAR. The maximum SAR level for the EUT will be the maximum level obtained of the performed measurements, and indicated in the previous points. Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 11 of 33 2010-02-15

2.6. System Validation Prior to the SAR measurements, system verification is done daily to verify the system accuracy. As FCC OET Bulletin 65 – Supplement C, Appendix D “SAR measurement procedures” Paragraph “System Verification” specifies, a complete SAR evaluation is done using a half-wavelength dipole as source with the frequency of the mid-band channel of the operating band, or within 100MHz of this channel. The measured 1 gr. and 10 gr. SAR should be within 10% of the expected target values specified in the calibration certificate of the dipole, for the specific tissue and frequency used. Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 12 of 33 2010-02-15

3. UNCERTAINTY Uncertainty for 300 MHz – 3 GHz Standard Standard Uncertainty Probability (ci) (ci) vi ERROR SOURCES Divisor uncertainty uncertainty value (%) distribution 1g 10g veff (1g) (10g) Measurement Equipment Probe Calibration ±5.9% Normal 1 1 1 ±5.90 % ±5.90% ∞ Axial Isotropy ±4.7% Rectangular 3 0.7 0.7 ±1.92% ±1.92% ∞ Hemispherical Isotropy ±9.6% Rectangular 3 0.7 0.7 ±3.92% ±3.92% ∞ Boundary effect ±1.0% Rectangular 3 1 1 ±0.58% ±0.58% ∞ Linearity ±4.7% Rectangular 3 1 1 ±2.71% ±2.71% ∞ System detection limits ±1.0% Rectangular 3 1 1 ±0.58% ±0.58% ∞ Readout electronics ±1.0% Normal 1 1 1 ±1.00% ±1.00% ∞ Response time ±0.8% Rectangular 3 1 1 ±0.46% ±0.46% ∞ Integration time ±2.6% Rectangular 3 1 1 ±1.50% ±1.50% ∞ RF Ambien conditions ±3.0% Rectangular 3 1 1 ±1.73% ±1.73% ∞ Probe positioner ±0.4% Rectangular 3 1 1 ±0.23% ±0.23% ∞ Probe positioning ±2.9% Rectangular 3 1 1 ±1.67% ±1.67% ∞ Maximum SAR evaluation ±1.0% Rectangular 3 1 1 ±0.58% ±0.58% ∞ Test Sample Related Device positioning ±2.9% Normal 1 1 1 ±2.90% ±2.90% 145 Device Holder ±3.6% Normal 1 1 1 ±3.60% ±3.60% 5 Power Drift ±5.0% Rectangular 3 1 1 ±2.89% ±2.89% ∞ Phantom and Setup Phantom uncertainty ±4.0% Rectangular 3 1 1 ±2.31% ±2.31% ∞ Liquid conductivity ±5.0% Rectangular 3 0.64 0.43 ±1.85% ±1.24% ∞ (deviation from target) Liquid conductivity ±2.5% Normal 1 0.64 0.43 ±1.60% ±1.08% ∞ (measurement error) Liquid permittivity ±5.0% Rectangular 3 0.60 0.49 ±1.73% ±1.41% ∞ (deviation from target) Liquid permittivity ±2.5% Normal 1 0.60 0.49 ±1.50% ±1.23% ∞ (measurement error) m Combined standard uncertainty uc = ∑c i 2 ⋅ ui2 ±10.85% ±10.62% 330 1=1 Expanded uncertainty ue =2.00 uc ±21.71% ±21.24% (confidence interval of 95%) Table 2: Uncertainty Assessment for 300 MHz - 3 GHz Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 13 of 33 2010-02-15

4. SAR LIMIT Having a worst case measurement, the SAR limit is valid for general population/uncontrolled exposure. The SAR values have to be averaged over a mass of 1g (SAR 1 gr.) with the shape of a cube. This level couldn’t exceed the values indicated in the application Standard: Standard SAR SAR Limit (W/Kg) FCC 47 CFR Part 2.1093 SAR 1 gr. 1.6 Paragraph (d)(2) Table 4: SAR limit Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 14 of 33 2010-02-15

APPENDIX B: Test results Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 15 of 33 2010-02-15

INDEX 1. TEST CONDITIONS...............................................................................................................................17 1.1. Power supply (V):.....................................................................................................................................17 1.2. Temperature (ºC):.....................................................................................................................................17 1.3. Test signal, Output Power and Frequencies..............................................................................................17 1.4. DUT information ......................................................................................................................................17 2. TISSUE PARAMETERS MEASUREMENTS........................................................................................18 3. SYSTEM VALIDATION MEASUREMENTS .......................................................................................18 3.1. Validation results in 2450 MHz Band for Body TSL...............................................................................18 4. MEASUREMENT RESULTS FOR SAR (SPECIFIC ABSORPTION RATE) ......................................18 4.1. Summary maximum results.......................................................................................................................18 4.2. Results for 2450 MHz Band .....................................................................................................................19 Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 16 of 33 2010-02-15

1. TEST CONDITIONS 1.1. Power supply (V): Vn = 11.1 Vdc battery Type of power supply = DC Voltage from rechargeable Li-Ion 11.1 V battery. 1.2. Temperature (ºC): Tn = +21.52 to +23.37 The subscript n indicates normal test conditions. 1.3. Test signal, Output Power and Frequencies The device was put into operation by using an own control software to program the test mode required for select the continuous transmission with 100% duty cycle. In all operating bands the measurements were performed on the “default test channels” defined at FCC OET KDB 248227 – SAR Measurements Procedures 802.11a/b/g Transmitters (May 2007 – Revised), except those that fulfil the frequency channel selection criteria mentioned on paragraph “Frequency Channel Configuration” at the same document. The output power of the device was set to maximum power level for all tests; a fully charged battery was used for every test sequence. The maximum average conducted power of the device was measured with a Power meter R&S NRVD and a thermocoupled Power sensor NRV-Z51. 1.4. DUT information The device under test was the Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 1000 card located inside a host laptop (S10-3S) computer which utilises a set of WNC antennas (25.91231.041 / 25.91231.031). The card was operated utilizing proprietary software (CRTU Version 5.15.36.0) and each channel was measured using a broadband power meter to determine the maximum average power. The device was tested in a single chain configuration which is representative of the maximum exposure condition of this wireless transceiver. Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 17 of 33 2010-02-15

2. TISSUE PARAMETERS MEASUREMENTS Target Body Tissue: Target Body Tissue: Parameters used in Probe Parameters used in Dipole Measured Body Tissue Frequency Calibration Calibration Measured (MHz) Date Conductivity Conductivity Conductivity Permittivity Permittivity Permittivity [S/m] [S/m] [S/m] 2450 52.7 ± 5% 1.95 ± 5% 53.2 ± 6% 2.00 ± 6% 50.44 2.02 2010-02-10 Note: The dielectric properties have been measured by the contact probe method at 21.5° C. 3. SYSTEM VALIDATION MEASUREMENTS 3.1. Validation results in 2450 MHz Band for Body TSL Target SAR Measured SAR SAR Drift (%) Limit (%) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 gr. 53.0 50.76 -4.23 ± 10 10 gr. 25.0 23.54 -5.84 ± 10 4. MEASUREMENT RESULTS FOR SAR (SPECIFIC ABSORPTION RATE) 4.1. Summary maximum results 2450 MHz band: SAR limit Frequency Measured SAR 1g Band Mode Channel 1g (MHz) (W/Kg) (W/Kg) 802.11b 1 2412 0.026 1.6 2 2450 MHz 802.11g - - NM 1.6 band 802.11n1 6 2437 0.027 1.6 1 802.11n* 6 2437 0.013 1.6 1 and 2: See Remarks and Comments. Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 18 of 33 2010-02-15

4.2. Results for 2450 MHz Band Conducted SAR Frequency Power Limit Mode Channel Power averaged over (MHz) Drift (%) (%) (dBm) 1g (W/Kg) 1 2412 16.75 0.026 -4.41 ±5 3 802.11b 6 2437 16.59 NM - ±5 3 11 2462 16.45 NM - ±5 2 1 2412 12.60 NM - ±5 802.11g 6 2437 16.53 NM2 - ±5 2 11 2462 11.40 NM - ±5 3 1 2417 11.75 NM - ±5 1 802.11n 6 2437 16.42 0.027 -2.61 ±5 3 11 2457 10.76 NM - ±5 3 2422 10.40 NM3 - ±5 1 802.11n* 6 2437 12.18 0.013 -0.98 ±5 3 9 2452 9.60 NM - ±5 1, 2 and 3: See Remarks and Comments. Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 19 of 33 2010-02-15

APPENDIX C: Measurements Reports Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 20 of 33 2010-02-15

2450 MHz Band – 802.11b Channel 1 DUT: S10-3S + Intel 112BNHMW + WNC Antennas; Type: Laptop; Serial: --- Program Name: 802.11b at 2450MHz Communication System: 802.11; Frequency: 2412 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used (interpolated): f = 2412 MHz; σ = 1.96 mho/m; εr = 50.6; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: - Probe: ES3DV3 - SN3052; ConvF(4.06, 4.06, 4.06); Calibrated: 27/10/2009 - Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE4 Sn669; Calibrated: 26/10/2009 - Phantom: Flat Phantom ELI4.0; Type: QDOVA001BA; Serial: SN:1060 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.7 Build 80; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 186 802.11b, Channel 1/Area Scan (81x81x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Info: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.029 mW/g 802.11b, Channel 1/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 3.36 V/m; Power Drift = -0.392 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.045 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.026 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.017 mW/g Info: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.028 mW/g 0 dB = 0.028mW/g Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 21 of 33 2010-02-15

2450 MHz Band – 802.11n Channel 6 DUT: S10-3S + Intel 112BNHMW + WNC Antennas; Type: Laptop; Serial: --- Program Name: 802.11n at 2450MHz Communication System: 802.11; Frequency: 2437 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used (interpolated): f = 2437 MHz; σ = 2 mho/m; εr = 50.5; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: - Probe: ES3DV3 - SN3052; ConvF(4.06, 4.06, 4.06); Calibrated: 27/10/2009 - Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE4 Sn669; Calibrated: 26/10/2009 - Phantom: Flat Phantom ELI4.0; Type: QDOVA001BA; Serial: SN:1060 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.7 Build 80; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 186 802.11n, Channel 6/Area Scan Chain (81x81x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Info: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.030 mW/g 802.11n, Channel 6/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 3.42 V/m; Power Drift = -0.230 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.049 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.027 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.017 mW/g Info: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.029 mW/g 0 dB = 0.029mW/g Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 22 of 33 2010-02-15

2450 MHz Band – 802.11n* Channel 6 DUT: S10-3S + Intel 112BNHMW + WNC Antennas; Type: Laptop; Serial: --- Program Name: 802.11n* at 2450MHz Communication System: 802.11; Frequency: 2437 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used (interpolated): f = 2437 MHz; σ = 2 mho/m; εr = 50.5; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: - Probe: ES3DV3 - SN3052; ConvF(4.06, 4.06, 4.06); Calibrated: 27/10/2009 - Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE4 Sn669; Calibrated: 26/10/2009 - Phantom: Flat Phantom ELI4.0; Type: QDOVA001BA; Serial: SN:1060 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.7 Build 80; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 186 802.11n*, Channel 6/Area Scan (81x81x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Info: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.014 mW/g 802.11n*, Channel 6/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 2.70 V/m; Power Drift = -0.086 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.024 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.013 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.00916 mW/g Info: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.014 mW/g 0 dB = 0.014mW/g Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 23 of 33 2010-02-15

APPENDIX D: Calibration Data Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 24 of 33 2010-02-15

argQ@ Winrceicss Calibration Laboratory of ,\t“'@?"« Schweizsriacher Kalibrierdienst Schmid & Partner in Service suisse d‘étalonnage Engineerlng AG 2 s Servizio svizzero di taratura Zoughausstrasse 43, 8004 Zurich, Switzorland *¥A .-\'? Swiss Calibration Service Accredited by the Swiss Accreditation Service (SAS) Accreditation No.: SCS 108 The Swiss Accreditation Service is one of the signatories to the EA Multilateral Agreement for the recognition of calibration certificates Client ATA wireless Contificate No: ES3—3052_OctO9 [CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE Objmct ES3SDV3— SN:3052 Calibration procedure{s) QA CAL—01 .v6, QA CAL—23.v3 and QA CAL—25.v2 Calibration procedure for dosimetric E—field probes Calibration date October 27, 2009 This calibration certficate documents the Iraceability to national standards, which realize the physical units of measurements (S1) The measurements and the uncertainties with confidence probability are given on the following pages and are part of the certificate All calibrations have been conducted in the dlosed iaboratory faciity: environment temperatune (22 + 3)°C and bumidity < 70% Calibration Equipment used (M&TE critical for calibration} Primary Standards |lp« Cal Date (Cenificate No—.] Scheduled Calibration Power meter E44198 GB41203074 1—Apr—08 (No— 217—01030) Apr—10 Power sensor E44124 MYA1495277 1—Apr—08 {NMo. 217—01030} Apr—10 Power sensor E4412A MY4149A0A7 1—Apr—08 (No. 217—01030) Apr—10 Reference 3 dB Attenuator SN; 55054 (3¢) 31—Mar—O$ (No. 217—01028) Mar—1Q Reference 20 dB Attenuator SN; §5006 (20b6) 31—Mar—08 (No, 217—01028) Mar—10 Reference 30 dB Attenuator SN. 55129 (30b) 31—Mar—08 (No. 217—01027} Mar—10 Reference Probe ES3DV2 SN: 3013 2—Jam—09 (No ES3—3013_Jan09) Jan—10 OAE4 SN; 860 20—5ep—09 (No. DAE4—560_SepQD) Sep—10 Secondary Standards ID # 8 Check Date (im house) _________ Scheduled Chack ____ RF generator HP 8648C US3042UO1700 4—Aug—99 (in house check Oct—09) in house check: Oct—11 Network Analyzer HP 8753E US37 300505 18—Oct—01 {in house check Oct—09) in house check: Oct10 Name Function Signature Calibrated by Marcel Fahr Laboratory Technician W{-" 7 PC T Approved by: Katta Pokowvic Technical Manager Issued: October 27. 2009 This calibration certficate shall not be reprndunen excepl in full veathout written approval of the 1amra1n|y Certificate No: ES3—3052_Oct09 Page 1 of 11

AT4~@ Winrceicss ES3DV3 SN:3052 October 27, 2008 DASY — Parameters of Probe: ES3DV3 SN:3052 Calibration Parameter Determined in Head Tissue Simulating Media f [MHz] Valldity (MHz]® Permittivity Conductivity ConvF X _ConvF ¥__ ConvF z Alpha ____Depth Unc (k=2) 835 + 50 / + 100 41.5 + 5% 0.90 £+5% 5.03 5.43 5.83 0.76 113 £11.0% 900 + 50 / £ 100 41,5.25% 0.97 + 5% 5.65 5.65 5.65 0.49 117 %11.0% 1750 + 50 / 4 100 40.1 + 5% 1.37 £5% 4.99 4.99 4.99 0.39 165 +11.0% 1900 + 50 / + 100 40,.0 + 5% 140 £5% 4.81 4.81 4.81 0.43 161 £11.0% 2000 + 50 /+ 100 40.0 £5% 1.40 + 5% 4.60 4.69 4.69 0.45 1162 +11.0% 2450 + 50 / 100 39.2 £5% 1.80 + 5% 4.26 4.26 4.26 0.31 222 £11.0% The valdity of + 100 MHz only spphes for DASY wi.4 and higher (see Page 2). The uncertainty is the RSS of the ConwF uncertainty at calibration frequency and the uncertainty for the incicated frequency band. Certificate No: ES3—3052 OctOd Page 5 of 11

ara@ Winrceicss ES3DV3 SN:3052 October 27, 20098 DASY — Parameters of Probe: ES3DV3 SN:3052 Calibration Parameter Determined in Body Tissue Simulating Media f [MHz] Validity [MHz]® Permittivity Conductivity ConvF X ConvF ¥_ ConvF Z2 Alpha Depth Unc (k=2) _ 835 + 50/ +100 55.2 £5% 0.97 £5% 5.71 5.71 5.71 0.70 118 211.0% §00 * 50 / +100 55.0 4 5% 1.05 £5% 5.55 5.55 5.55 0.78 116 2 11.0% 1750 + 50 / £ 100 53.4 £5% 149 £5% 4.66 4.66 4.86 0.26 2.59 +11.0% 1900 + 50 / + 100 53.3 4 5% 1.52 £5% 4.43 4 43 4 43 0.30 245 +11.0% 2000 + 50/ +100 532.3 £ 5% 1.52 £5% 4.46 4. 46 4 46 0.25 2.90 2 11.0% 2450 + 50 / + 100 52.7 4 5% 1.85 4 5% 4.06 4. 06 4.06 0.49 149 £11.0% The valldity of + 100 MHz only appbes ftor DASY vi 4 and higher (see Page 2). The uncerlainty is the RSS of the ConvF uncertiinty al calibration frequency and the uncertainty for the indicated frequency band Certificate No: ES3—3052 OctOo Page 6 of 11

areQ@ Winrceicss Calibration Laboratory of Schwelzerischer Kalibrierdienst Schmid & Partner Service suissed‘étalonnage Engineering AG Servigio svizzero di taraturs Zeughausstrasse 43,8004 Zurich, Switzerland Swiss Calibration Service Accredited by the Swiss Accreditation Service (SAS) The Swiss Accreditation Service is one of the signatories to the EA Multilateral Agreement for the recognition of callbration certificates Cbject Calibration procedure(s) Calibration date: Condition of the calibrated Mam This calibration cortficate documents the traceability to national standards, which realize the physical units of measuremeants (S1). The measurements and the uncertainties with contidence probatility are given on the following pages and are part of the certificate, All calibrations have been conducted in the closed laboratory facility: environment temperature {22 4 3)°C and humidiy <70%, Calibration Equipment used (M&TE critical tor calibration} Primary Standards 10 # Cal Date (Calibrated by, Certiticate No.) Scheduled Calibration Power meter EPM—4424 GB37480704 08—Oct—08 (No. 217—00898) Oct—O8 Power sensor HP 84814 Us37202783 08—Oct—08 (No. 217—00898) Oct—O8 Reference 20 dB Attenuatar SN: 5006 (209) 31—Mar—09 (No, 217—010258) MarA1Q Type—N miamaich combination Sh: 5047.2 / Gesz?y 31—Mar—09 (No. 217—01029) Mar—40 Reference Probe ES3OV2 SN: 30256 28—Apr—08 (No— ES3—3025 _ Apr08) Apr—Od Retorence Probe ES3DV2 SN: 3025 30—Apr—08 (No. E53—3025_Aprou) Apr—10 DAE4 SN: 601 07—Mar—09 (No, DAE4—601_Mart9) Mar—10 Secondary Standards ID # Check Date (in house) Schoduled Chack Power sansor HP 8491A Mya10g2317 18—0ct—02 (in house chack Oct—07) In house check; Oct—O§ RF genarator A&S SMT—O6 100005 4—Aug—09 (in house check Oct—07) In house check: Oct—O8 Network Analyzer HP8753E US37300585 54206 18—Oct—01 (in house check Oct—08) In house check: Oct—09 Function Signature Calibrated by: Approved by: Issuad: June 19, 2008 This calibration certificate shall not be reproduced except in full without witten approval of the laboratory. Certificate No: D2450V2—756_JunO§ Page 1 of 9

arae@ Winrceicss Measurement Conditions DASY system confiquration, as tar as not g Iven on page 1 DASY Version DASYS 5.0 Extrapolation Advanced Extrapotation Phantom Modular Flat Phantom ¥5.0 Distance Dipole Center — TSL 10 mm with Spacer Zoom Scan Resolution dx, dy, dz =5 mm Frequency 2450 MHz +1 MHz Head TSL parameters The following parameters and calculations were applied. Temperature Permittivity Conductivity Nominal Head TSL parameters 22.0 °C 39.2 1.80 mhoim Measured Head TSL parameters (22.0 + 0.2) °C 40.4 +6 % 1.78 mha‘m 1 6 % Head TSL temperature during test (22.4 + 0.2) °C 4e SAR result with Head TSL SAR averaged over 1 em" (1 g) of Head TSL Condition SAR measured 250 mW input power 13.3 mW /g SAR normalized normalized to 1 W 53.2 mW /g SAR for nominal Head TSL parameters ‘ normalized to 1W 53.9 mW /g #17.0 % (k=2) SAR averaged over 10 cm" (10 g) of Head TSL condition SAR measured 250 mW input power 6.28 mW /g SAR normalized normalized to 1W 25.2 mW / g SAA for nominal Head TSL parameters / normalized to 1W 25.3 mW ig =16.5 % (k=2) ‘ Correction to nominal TSL parameters according to d), chapter "SAR Sensitivitles" Cerificate No: D2450V2—756_JunOg Page 3 of 9

Report Nº(NIE): 31131RET.002 Page 30 of 33 2010-02-15


Document Created: 2010-02-15 17:54:52
Document Modified: 2010-02-15 17:54:52
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC