Sar report I

FCC ID: P4MAGT100D

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_698536

SAR EVALUATION REPORT For AnyData Corporation 18902 Bardeen Ave. Irvine, CA 92612-1522, U.S.A FCC ID: P4MAGT100D This Report Concerns: Equipment Type: Original Report CDMA AGPS Tracker Test Engineer: Eric Hong/ Report No.: R0607263S Report Date: 2006-08-07 Reviewed By: Lab Manager: Samuil Lisinker Bay Area Compliance Laboratory Corporation 1274 Anvilwood Ave. Prepared By: Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Tel: (408) 732-9162 Fax: (408) 732 9164 Note: This test report is specially limited to the above client company and this particular sample only. It may not be duplicated without prior written consent of Bay Area Compliance Laboratory Corporation. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the U.S. Government.

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D DECLARATION OF COMPLIANCE SAR EVALUATION Rule Part(s): CFR47 §2.1093 Test Procedure(s): FCC OET Bulletin 65 Supplement C Device Classification: Licensed Mobile Transmitter Device Type: CDMA Position Reporting Device FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Modulation: CDMA TX Frequency Range: 824-849 MHz/1850-1910 MHz Max. Conducted Power Tested: 26.15dBm (835MHz) / 26.27dBm (1900MHz) Antenna Type(s): Integral Antenna Body-Worn Accessories: Belt Clip Face-Head Accessories: None SAR Value Measured: 0.821mW/g (835MHz Band) / 1.46mW/g (1900MHz Band) BACL Corp. declares under its sole responsibility that this wireless portable device has been determined to be in compliance for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) for uncontrolled exposure and general population exposure limits specified in EN 50361:2001 and has been tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in ANSI IEEE C95.3:2002 All measurements reported herein were performed under my supervision and believed to be accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further attest for the completeness of these measurements and vouch for the qualifications any and all personnel performing such measurements. The results and statements contained in this report pertain only to the device(s) evaluated. Eric Hong /signature/ Bay Area Compliance Laboratory Corp. Report#R0607263S Page 2 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D TABLE OF CONTENTS REFERENCE, STANDARDS, AND GUILDELINES ...............................................................................................4 SAR LIMITS .................................................................................................................................................................5 EUT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................................................6 DESCRIPTION OF TEST SYSTEM ..........................................................................................................................7 MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM .............................................................................................................................9 SYSTEM COMPONENTS ...............................................................................................................................................11 TESTING EQUIPMENT............................................................................................................................................20 EQUIPMENTS LIST & CALIBRATION INFO ...................................................................................................................20 SAR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION ..............................................................................................21 SYSTEM ACCURACY VERIFICATION ...........................................................................................................................21 EUT TEST STRATEGY AND METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................23 SAR EVALUATION PROCEDURE .................................................................................................................................23 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................................24 SAR TEST DATA ........................................................................................................................................................24 APPENDIX A – MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ............................................................................................25 APPENDIX B – PROBE CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES .................................................................................27 APPENDIX D - TEST SYSTEM VERIFICATIONS SCANS.................................................................................52 LIQUID MEASUREMENT RESULT ................................................................................................................................52 APPENDIX E - EUT SCANS .....................................................................................................................................57 APPENDIX F – CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER MEASUREMENT ...............................................................65 PROVISION APPLICABLE.............................................................................................................................................65 TEST PROCEDURE ......................................................................................................................................................65 TEST EQUIPMENT .......................................................................................................................................................65 TEST RESULTS ...........................................................................................................................................................65 APPENDIX G – EUT TEST POSITION PHOTOS .................................................................................................66 BODY WORM SETUP PHOTO WITH BELT CLIP ...............................................................................................................66 APPENDIX H – EUT & ACCESSORIES PHOTOS ...............................................................................................67 EUT - TOP VIEW ........................................................................................................................................................67 EUT - BOTTOM VIEW ................................................................................................................................................67 APPENDIX I - INFORMATIVE REFERENCES....................................................................................................68 Report#R0607263S Page 3 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D REFERENCE, STANDARDS, AND GUILDELINES FCC: The Report and Order requires routine SAR evaluation prior to equipment authorization of portable transmitter devices, including portable telephones. For consumer products, the applicable limit is 1.6 mw/g as recommended by the ANSI/IEEE standard C95.1-1992 [6] for an uncontrolled environment (Paragraph 65). According to the Supplement C of OET Bulletin 65 “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guide-lines for Human Exposure to Radio frequency Electromagnetic Fields", released on Jun 29, 2001 by the FCC, the device should be evaluated at maximum output power (radiated from the antenna) under “worst-case” conditions for normal or intended use, incorporating normal antenna operating positions, device peak performance frequencies and positions for maximum RF energy coupling. This report describes the methodology and results of experiments performed on wireless data terminal. The objective was to determine if there is RF radiation and if radiation is found, what is the extent of radiation with respect to safety limits. SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) is the measure of RF exposure determined by the amount of RF energy absorbed by human body (or its parts) – to determine how the RF energy couples to the body or head which is a primary health concern for body worn devices. The limit below which the exposure to RF is considered safe by regulatory bodies in North America is 1.6 mw/g average over 1 gram of tissue mass. CE: The order requires routine SAR evaluation prior to equipment authorization of portable transmitter devices, including portable telephones. For consumer products, the applicable limit is 2 mw/g as recommended by the EN50360 for an uncontrolled environment. According to the Standard, the device should be evaluated at maximum output power (radiated from the antenna) under “worst-case” conditions for normal or intended use, incorporating normal antenna operating positions, device peak performance frequencies and positions for maximum RF energy coupling. This report describes the methodology and results of experiments performed on wireless data terminal. The objective was to determine if there is RF radiation and if radiation is found, what is the extent of radiation with respect to safety limits. SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) is the measure of RF exposure determined by the amount of RF energy absorbed by human body (or its parts) – to determine how the RF energy couples to the body or head which is a primary health concern for body worn devices. The limit below which the exposure to RF is considered safe by regulatory bodies in Europe is 2 mw/g average over 10 gram of tissue mass. The test configurations were laid out on a specially designed test fixture to ensure the reproducibility of measurements. Each configuration was scanned for SAR. Analysis of each scan was carried out to characterize the above effects in the device. There was no SAR of any concern measured on the device for any of the investigated configurations. Report#R0607263S Page 4 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D SAR Limits FCC Limit (1g) SAR (W/kg) EXPOSURE LIMITS (General Population / (Occupational / Uncontrolled Exposure Controlled Exposure Environment) Environment) Spatial Average (averaged over the whole body) 0.08 0.4 Spatial Peak (averaged over any 1 g of tissue) 1.60 8.0 Spatial Peak (hands/wrists/feet/ankles 4.0 20.0 averaged over 10 g) CE Limit (10g) SAR (W/kg) EXPOSURE LIMITS (General Population / (Occupational / Uncontrolled Exposure Controlled Exposure Environment) Environment) Spatial Average (averaged over the whole body) 0.08 0.4 Spatial Peak (averaged over any 1 g of tissue) 2.0 10 Spatial Peak (hands/wrists/feet/ankles 4.0 20.0 averaged over 10 g) Population/Uncontrolled Environments are defined as locations where there is the exposure of individual who have no knowledge or control of their exposure. Occupational/Controlled Environments are defined as locations where there is exposure that may be incurred by people who are aware of the potential for exposure (i.e. as a result of employment or occupation). Population/uncontrolled environments Spatial Peak limit 1.6w/kg (FCC) & 2.0w/kg (CE) applied to the EUT. Report#R0607263S Page 5 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D EUT DESCRIPTION The AnyDATA Corporation.’s product, FCC ID: P4MAGT100D or the “EUT" as referred to in this report is a dual-band device that operates on both Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) frequencies: cellular services at 800 MHz, and Personal Communication Services (PCS) at 1.9 GHz. Also features soft/softer handoff, hard handoff, and dynamic RF power control technologies to reduce call interruptions. Approximate measurement is: 81mmL x 47 mmW x 20.5mmH * The test data gathered are from typical production sample, serial number: 001, provided by the manufacturer. Report#R0607263S Page 6 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D DESCRIPTION OF TEST SYSTEM These measurements were performed with the automated near-field scanning system DASY4 from Schmid & Partner Engineering AG (SPEAG) which is the fourth generation of the system shown in the figure hereinafter: The system is based on a high precision robot (working range greater than 0.9m), which positions the probes with a positional repeatability of better than ±0.02mm. Special E- and H-field probes have been developed for measurements close to material discontinuity, the sensors of which are directly loaded with a Schottky diode and connected via highly resistive lines to the data acquisition unit. The SAR measurements were conducted with the dosimetric probe ET3DV6 SN: 1604 (manufactured by SPEAG), designed in the classical triangular configuration and optimized for dosimetric evaluation. The probe has been calibrated according to the procedure with accuracy of better than ±10%. The spherical isotropy was evaluated with the procedure and found to be better than ±0.25dB. Report#R0607263S Page 7 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D The phantom used was the Generic Twin Phantom”. The ear was simulated as a spacer of 4 mm thickness between the earpiece of the phone and the tissue simulating liquid. The Tissue simulation liquid used for each test is in according with the FCC OET65 supplement C as listed below. Ingredients Frequency (MHz) (% by weight) 450 835 915 1900 2450 Tissue Type Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Water 38.56 51.16 41.45 52.4 41.05 56.0 54.9 40.4 62.7 73.2 Salt (Nacl) 3.95 1.49 1.45 1.4 1.35 0.76 0.18 0.5 0.5 0.04 Sugar 56.32 46.78 56.0 45.0 56.5 41.76 0.0 58.0 0.0 0.0 HEC 0.98 0.52 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.21 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Bactericide 0.19 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.27 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Triton x-100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 DGBE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.92 0.0 0.0 26.7 Dielectric Constant 43.42 58.0 42.54 56.1 42.0 56.8 39.9 54.0 39.8 52.5 Conductivity (s/m) 0.85 0.83 0.91 0.95 1.0 1.07 1.42 1.45 1.88 1.78 IEEE SCC-34/SC-2 P1528 Recommended Tissue Dielectric Parameters Frequency Head Body (MHz) εr Ơ (S/m) εr Ơ (S/m) 150 52.3 0.76 61.9 0.80 300 45.3 0.87 58.2 0.92 450 43.5 0.87 56.7 0.94 835 41.5 0.90 55.2 0.97 900 41.5 0.97 55.0 1.05 915 41.5 0.98 55.0 1.06 1450 40.5 1.20 54.0 1.30 1610 40.3 1.29 53.8 1.40 1800-2000 40.0 1.40 53.3 1.52 2450 39.2 1.80 52.7 1.95 3000 38.5 2.40 52.0 2.73 5800 35.3 5.27 48.2 6.00 Report#R0607263S Page 8 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Measurement System Diagram The DASY4 system for performing compliance tests consists of the following items: • A standard high precision 6-axis robot (St¨aubli RX family) with controller, teach pendant and software. An arm extension for accommodating the data acquisition electronics (DAE). • A dosimetric probe, i.e., an isotropic E-field probe optimized and calibrated for usage in tissue simulating liquid. The probe is equipped with an optical surface detector system. • A data acquisition electronics (DAE) which performs the signal amplification, signal multiplexing, AD-conversion, offset measurements, mechanical surface detection, collision detection, etc. The unit is battery powered with standard or rechargeable batteries. The signal is optically transmitted to the EOC. • The Electro-optical converter (EOC) performs the conversion between optical and electrical of the signals for the digital communication to the DAE and for the analog signal from the optical surface detection. The EOC is connected to the measurement server. • The function of the measurement server is to perform the time critical tasks such as signal filtering, control of the robot operation and fast movement interrupts. • A probe alignment unit which improves the (absolute) accuracy of the probe positioning. • A computer operating Windows 2000 or Windows XP. Report#R0607263S Page 9 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D • DASY4 software. • Remote control with teach pendant and additional circuitry for robot safety such as warning lamps, etc. • The SAM twin phantom enabling testing left-hand and right-hand usage. • The device holder for handheld mobile phones. • Tissue simulating liquid mixed according to the given recipes. • Validation dipole kits allowing to validate the proper functioning of the system. Report#R0607263S Page 10 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D System Components • DASY4 Measurement Server • Data Acquisition Electronics • Probes • Light Beam Unit • Medium • SAM Twin Phantom • Device Holder for SAM Twin Phantom • System Validation Kits • Robot DASY4 Measurement Server The DASY4 measurement server is based on a PC/104 CPU board with a 166MHz low-power pentium, 32MB chip disk and 64MB RAM. The necessary circuits for communication with either the DAE4 (or DAE3) electronic box as well as the 16-bit AD-converter system for optical detection and digital I/O interface are contained on the DASY4 I/O-board, which is directly connected to the PC/104 bus of the CPU board. The measurement server performs all real-time data evaluation for field measurements and surface detection, controls robot movements and handles safety operation. The PC-operating system cannot interfere with these time critical processes. All connections are supervised by a watchdog, and disconnection of any of the cables to the measurement server will automatically disarm the robot and disable all program-controlled robot movements. Furthermore, the measurement server is equipped with two expansion slots which are reserved for future applications. Please note that the expansion slots do not have a standardized pinout and therefore only the expansion cards provided by SPEAG can be inserted. Expansion cards from any other supplier could seriously damage the measurement server. Report#R0607263S Page 11 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Data Acquisition Electronics The data acquisition electronics DAE3 consists of a highly sensitive electrometergrade preamplifier with auto-zeroing, a channel and gain-switching multiplexer, a fast 16 bit AD-converter and a command decoder and control logic unit. Transmission to the measurement server is accomplished through an optical downlink for data and status information as well as an optical uplink for commands and the clock. Probes The DASY system can support many different probe types. Dosimetric Probes: These probes are specially designed and calibrated for use in liquids with high permittivity. They should not be used in air, since the spherical isotropy in air is poor (±2 dB). The dosimetric probes have special calibrations in various liquids at different frequencies. Free Space Probes: These are electric and magnetic field probes specially designed for measurements in free space. The z-sensor is aligned to the probe axis and the rotation angle of the x-sensor is specified. This allows the DASY system to automatically align the probe to the measurement grid for field component measurement. The free space probes are generally not calibrated in liquid. (The H-field probes can be used in liquids without any change of parameters.) Temperature Probes: Small and sensitive temperature probes for general use. They use a completely different parameter set and different evaluation procedures. Temperature rise features allow direct SAR evaluations with these probes. ET3DV6 Probe Specification Construction Symmetrical design with triangular core Built-in optical fiber for surface detection System Built-in shielding against static charges Calibration In air from 10 MHz to 2.5 GHz In brain and muscle simulating tissue at Frequencies of 450 MHz, 900 MHz and 1.8 GHz (accuracy ± 8%) Frequency 10 MHz to > 6 GHz; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB (30 MHz to 3 GHz) Directivity ± 0.2 dB in brain tissue (rotation around probe axis) ± 0.4 dB in brain tissue (rotation normal probe axis) Dynamic 5 mW/g to > 100 mW/g; Range Linearity: ± 0.2 dB Surface ± 0.2 mm repeatability in air and clear liquids Photograph of the probe Detection over diffuse reflecting surfaces. Dimensions Overall length: 330 mm Tip length: 16 mm Report#R0607263S Page 12 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Body diameter: 12 mm Tip diameter: 6.8 mm Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7 mm Application General dosimetric up to 3 GHz Compliance tests of mobile phones Fast automatic scanning in arbitrary phantoms The SAR measurements were conducted with the dosimetric probe ET3DV6 designed in the classical triangular configuration and optimized for dosimetric evaluation. The probe is constructed using the thick film technique; with printed resistive lines on ceramic substrates. The probe is equipped with an optical multi-fiber line ending at the front of the probe tip. It is connected to the EOC box on the robot arm and provides an automatic detection of the phantom surface. Half of the fibers are connected to a pulsed infrared transmitter, the other half to a synchronized receiver. As the probe approaches the surface, the reflection from the surface produces a coupling from the transmitting to the receiving fibers. This reflection increases first during the approach, reaches maximum and then decreases. If the probe is flatly touching the surface, the coupling is zero. The distance of the coupling maximum to the surface is independent of the surface reflectivity and largely independent of the surface to probe angle. The DASY3 software reads the reflection Inside view of during a software approach and looks for the maximum using a 2nd ET3DV6 E-field Probe order fitting. The approach is stopped when reaching the maximum. E-Field Probe Calibration Process Each probe is calibrated according to a dosimetric assessment procedure described in [6] with accuracy better than +/- 10%. The spherical isotropy was evaluated with the procedure described in [7] and found to be better than +/-0.25dB. The sensitivity parameters (NormX, NormY, NormZ), the diode compression parameter (DCP) and the conversion factor (ConvF) of the probe are tested. The free space E-field from amplified probe outputs is determined in a test chamber. This is performed in a TEM cell for frequencies bellow 1 GHz, and in a waveguide above 1 GHz for free space. For the free space calibration, the probe is placed in the volumetric center of the cavity and at the proper orientation with the field. The probe is then rotated 360 degrees. E-field temperature correlation calibration is performed in a flat phantom filled with the appropriate simulated brain tissue. The measured free space E-field in the medium correlates to temperature rise in dielectric medium. For temperature correlation calibration a RF transparent thermistor-based temperature probe is used in conjunction with the E-field probe. Data Evaluation The DASY4 postprocessing software (SEMCAD) automatically executes the following procedures to calculate the field units from the microvolt readings at the probe connector. The parameters used in the evaluation are stored in the configuration modules of the software: Probe parameters: - Sensitivity Normi, ai0, ai1, ai2 - Conversion factor ConvFi - Diode compression point dcpi Report#R0607263S Page 13 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Device parameters: - Frequency f - Crest factor cf Media parameters: - Conductivity σ - Density ρ These parameters must be set correctly in the software. They can be found in the component documents or they can be imported into the software from the configuration files issued for the DASY components. In the direct measuring mode of the multimeter option, the parameters of the actual system setup are used. In the scan visualization and export modes, the parameters stored in the corresponding document files are used. The first step of the evaluation is a linearization of the filtered input signal to account for the compression characteristics of the detector diode. The compensation depends on the input signal, the diode type and the DC-transmission factor from the diode to the evaluation electronics. If the exciting field is pulsed, the crest factor of the signal must be known to correctly compensate for peak power. The formula for each channel can be given as: With Vi = compensated signal of channel i (i =x, y, z) Ui = input signal of channel i (i =x, y, z) cf = crest factor of exciting field (DASY parameter) dcpi = diode compression point (DASY parameter) From the compensated input signals the primary field data for each channel can be evaluated: With Vi = compensated signal of channel i (i =x, y, z) Normi = sensor sensitivity of channel i (i =x, y, z) µV/ (V/m)2 for E-field probes ConF = sensitivity enhancement in solution aij = sensor sensitivity factors for H-field probes f = carrier frequency [GHz] Ei = electric field strenggy of channel i in V/m Hi = diode compression point (DASY parameter) The RSS value of the field components gives the total field strength (Hermitian magnitude): The primary field data are used to calculate the derived field units. Report#R0607263S Page 14 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D With SAR = local specific absorption rate in mW/g Etot = total field strength in V/m σ = conductivity in [mho/m] or [Siemens/m] ρ = equivalent tissue density in g/cm3 Note that the density is normally set to 1, to account for actual brain density rather than the density of the simulation liquid. Report#R0607263S Page 15 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Light Beam Unit The light beam switch allows automatic ”tooling” of the probe. During the process, the actual position of the probe tip with respect to the robot arm is measured, as well as the probe length and the horizontal probe offset. The software then corrects all movements, so that the robot coordinates are valid for the probe tip. The repeatability of this process is better than 0.1 mm. If a position has been taught with an aligned probe, the same position will be reached with another aligned probe within 0.1 mm, even if the other probe has different dimensions. During probe rotations, the probe tip will keep its actual position. Medium Parameters The parameters of the tissue simulating liquid strongly influence the SAR in the liquid The parameters for the different frequencies are defined in the corresponding compliance standards (e.g., EN 50361, IEEE 1528-2003). Parameter measurements Several measurement systems are available for measuring the dielectric parameters of liquids: • The open coax test method (e.g., HP85070 dielectric probe kit) is easy to use, but has only moderate accuracy. It is calibrated with open, short, and deionized water and the calibrations a critical process. • The transmission line method (e.g., model 1500T from DAMASKOS, INC.) measures the transmission and reflection in a liquid filled high precision line. It needs standard two port calibration and is probably more accurate than the open coax method. • The reflection line method measures the reflection in a liquid filled shorted precision lined.The method is not suitable for these liquids because of its low sensitivity. • The slotted line method scans the field magnitude and phase along a liquid filled line. The evaluation is straight forward and only needs a simple response calibration. The method is very accurate, but can only be used in high loss liquids and at frequencies above 100 to 200MHz. Cleaning the line can be tedious. Report#R0607263S Page 16 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D SAM Twin Phantom The SAM twin phantom is a fiberglass shell phantom with 2mm shell thickness (except the ear region where shell thickness increases to 6mm). It has three measurement areas: • Left hand • Right hand • Flat phantom The phantom table comes in two sizes: A 100 x 50 x 85 cm (L x W x H) table for use with free standing robots (DASY4 professional system option) or as a second phantom and a 100 x 75 x 85 cm(L x W x H) table with reinforcements for table mounted robots (DASY4 compact system option) . The bottom plate contains three pair of bolts for locking the device holder. The device holder positions are adjusted to the standard measurement positions in the three sections. Only one device holder is necessary if two phantoms are used (e.g., for different liquids) A white cover is provided to tap the phantom during o_-periods to prevent water evaporation and changes in the liquid parameters. Free space scans of devices on the cover are possible. On the phantom top, three reference markers are provided to identify the phantom position with respect to the robot. The phantom can be used with the following tissue simulating liquids: • Water-sugar based liquids can be left permanently in the phantom. Always cover the liquid if the system is not used, otherwise the parameters will change due to water evaporation. • Glycol based liquids should be used with care. As glycol is a softener for most plastics, the liquid should be taken out of the phantom and the phantom should be dried when the system is not used (desirable at least once a week). • Do not use other organic solvents without previously testing the phantom resistiveness. Report#R0607263S Page 17 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Device Holder for SAM Twin Phantom The SAR in the phantom is approximately inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the source and the liquid surface. For a source in 5mm distance, a positioning uncertainty of ±0.5mm would produce a SAR uncertainty of ±20%. An accurate device positioning is therefore crucial for accurate and repeatable measurements. The positions, in which the devices must be measured, are defined by the standards. The DASY device holder is designed to cope with different positions given in the standard. It has two scales for the device rotation (with respect to the body axis) and the device inclination (with respect to the line between the ear reference points). The rotation centers for both scales is the ear reference point ERP). Thus the device needs no repositioning when changing the angles. The DASY device holder has been made out of low-loss POM material having the following dielectric parameters: relative permittivity "=3 and loss tangent _=0.02. The amount of dielectric material has been reduced in the closest vicinity of the device, since measurements have suggested that the influence of the clamp on the test results could thus be lowered. Report#R0607263S Page 18 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D System Validation Kits Each DASY system is equipped with one or more system validation kits. These units, together with the predefined measurement procedures within the DASY software, enable the user to conduct the system performance check and system validation. For that purpose a well defined SAR distribution in the flat section of the SAM twin phantom is produced. System validation kit includes a dipole, tripod holder to fix it underneath the flat phantom and a corresponding distance holder. Dipoles are available for the variety of frequencies between 300MHz and 6 GHz (dipoles for other frequencies or media and other calibration conditions are available upon request). The dipoles are highly symmetric and matched at the center frequency for the specified liquid and distance to the flat phantom (or flat section of the SAM-twin phantom). The accurate distance between the liquid surface and the dipole center is achieved with a distance holder that snaps on the dipole. Robot The DASY4 system uses the high precision industrial robots RX60L, RX90 and RX90L, as well as the RX60BL and RX90BL types out of the newer series from St¨aubli SA (France). The RX robot series offers many features that are important for our application: • High precision (repeatability 0.02mm) • High reliability (industrial design) • Low maintenance costs (virtually maintenance-free due to direct drive gears; no belt drives) • Jerk-free straight movements (brushless synchron motors; no stepper motors) • Low ELF interference (the closed metallic construction shields against motor control fields) For the newly delivered DASY4 systems as well as for the older DASY3 systems delivered since 1999, the CS7MB robot controller version from St¨aubli is used. Previously delivered systems have either a CS7 or CS7M controller; the differences to the CS7MB are mainly in the hardware, but some procedures in the robot software from St¨aubli are also not completely the same. The following descriptions about robot hard- and software correspond to CS7MB controller with software version 13.1 (edit S5). The actual commands, procedures and configurations, also including details in hardware, might differ if an older robot controller is in use. In this case please also refer to the St¨aubli manuals for further information. Report#R0607263S Page 19 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D TESTING EQUIPMENT Equipments List & Calibration Info Type / Model Cal. Date S/N: DASY4 Professional Dosimetric System N/A N/A Robot RX60L N/A CS7MBSP / 467 Robot Controller N/A F01/5J72A1/A/01 Dell Computer Dimension 3000 N/A N/A SPEAG EDC3 N/A N/A SPEAG DAE3 2005-10-18 456 DASY4 Measurement Server N/A 1176 SPEAG E-Field Probe ET3DV6 2006-05-02 1604 Antenna, Dipole, D900V2 2006-06-16 122 Antenna, Dipole, D1800-S-1 2005-03-04 BCL-049 SPEAG Generic Twin Phantom N/A N/A SPEAG Light Alignment Sensor N/A 278 Brain Equivalent Matter (1900MHz) Each Use N/A Muscle Equivalent Matter (1900MHz) Each Use N/A Brain Equivalent Matter (835MHz) Each Use N/A Muscle Equivalent Matter (835MHz) Each Use N/A Robot Table Each Use N/A Phone Holder Each Use N/A Phantom Cover Each Use N/A HP Spectrum Analyzer HP8566A N/A 2240A01930 Microwave Amp. 8349A N/A 2644A02662 Power Meter Agilent E4419B 2005-08-31 MY4121511 Power Sensor Agilent E4412A 2005-09-08 US38488542 Network Analyzer HP-8752C 2005-02-22 820079 Dielectric Probe Kit HP85070A Each Use US99360201 Signal Generator HP-83650B 2005-05-10 3614A002716 Amplifier, ST181-20 N/R E012-0101 Report#R0607263S Page 20 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D SAR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION System Accuracy Verification Prior to the assessment, the system validation kit was used to test whether the system was operating within its specifications of ±10%. The validation results are tabulated below. And also the corresponding SAR plot is attached as well in the SAR plots files. IEEE P1528 recommended reference value for head Frequency Local SAR at surface Local SAR at surface 1 g SAR 10 g SAR (MHz) (above feed point) (v=2cm offset from feed point) 300 3.0 2.0 4.4 2.1 450 4.9 3.3 7.2 3.2 835 9.5 6.2 14.1 4.9 900 10.8 6.9 16.4 5.4 1450 29.0 16.0 50.2 6.5 1800 38.1 19.8 69.5 6.8 1900 39.7 20.5 72.1 6.6 2000 41.1 21.1 74.6 6.5 2450 52.4 24.0 104.2 7.7 3000 63.8 25.7 140.2 9.5 Validation Dipole SAR Reference Test Result for Body (835 MHz) Validation SAR @ 1W Input averaged over 1g SAR @ 1W Input averaged over 10g Measurement Test 1 7.71 4.91 Test 2 7.98 5.08 Test 3 8.0 5.09 Test 4 7.98 5.06 Test 5 7.84 5.0 Test 6 7.61 4.85 Test 7 7.89 5.02 Test 8 7.9 5.05 Test 9 7.92 5.07 Test 10 7.99 5.09 Average 7.873 5.022 Report#R0607263S Page 21 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Validation Dipole SAR Reference Test Result for Body (1900 MHz) SAR @ 0.126W SAR @ 1W SAR @ 0.126W SAR @ 1W Validation Input averaged Input averaged Input averaged Input averaged Measurement over 1g over 1g over 10g over 10g Test 1 3.1 24.61 1.42 11.27 Test 2 3.1 24.61 1.41 11.20 Test 3 3.2 25.41 1.43 11.35 Test 4 3.2 25.41 1.42 11.27 Test 5 3.1 24.61 1.42 11.27 Test 6 3.2 25.61 1.41 11.20 Test 7 3.2 25.61 1.43 11.35 Test 8 3.1 24.61 1.42 11.27 Test 9 3.1 24.61 1.42 11.27 Test 10 3.1 24.61 1.43 11.35 Average 3.14 24.97 1.421 11.28 Report#R0607263S Page 22 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D EUT TEST STRATEGY AND METHODOLOGY SAR Evaluation Procedure The evaluation was performed with the following procedure: Step 1: Measurement of the SAR value at a fixed location above the ear point or central position was used as a reference value for assessing the power drop. Step 2: The SAR distribution at the exposed side of the head was measured at a distance of 3.9 mm from the inner surface of the shell. The area covered the entire dimension of the head or EUT and the horizontal grid spacing was 20 mm x 20 mm. Based on these data, the area of the maximum absorption was determined by spline interpolation. Step 3: Around this point, a volume of 32 mm x 32 mm x 34 mm was assessed by measuring 5 x 5 x 7 points. On the basis of this data set, the spatial peak SAR value was evaluated under the following procedure: 1. The data at the surface were extrapolated, since the center of the dipoles is 2.7 mm away from the tip of the probe and the distance between the surface and the lowest measuring point is 1.2 mm. The extrapolation was based on a least square algorithm [11]. A polynomial of the fourth order was calculated through the points in z-axes. This polynomial was then used to evaluate the points between the surface and the probe tip. 2. The maximum interpolated value was searched with a straightforward algorithm. Around this maximum the SAR values averaged over the spatial volumes (1 g or 10 g) were computed by the 3D-Spline interpolation algorithm. The 3D-Spline is composed of three onedimensional splines with the “Not a knot"-condition (in x, y and z-directions) [11], [12]. The volume was integrated with the trapezoidal-algorithm. One thousand points (10 x 10 x 10) were interpolated to calculate the average. 3. All neighboring volumes were evaluated until no neighboring volume with a higher average value was found. Step 4: Re-measurement of the SAR value at the same location as in Step 1. If the value changed by more than 5%, the evaluation was repeated. Report#R0607263S Page 23 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D CONCLUSION This page summarizes the results of the performed dosimetric evaluation. The plots with the corresponding SAR distributions, which reveal information about the location of the maximum SAR with respect to the device, could be found in Appendix E. SAR Test Data Environmental Conditions Ambient Temperature: 25° C Relative Humidity: 77% ATM Pressure: 1026 mbar * Testing was performed by Eric Hong on 2006-08-07. Output Measured Limit EUT position Freq (MHz) Phantom Plot # Power (dBm) (mw/g) (mw/g) BODY WORN WITH BELT 824.7 26.15 Flat 0.380 1.6 1 CLIP BODY WORN WITH BELT 836.52 26.03 Flat 0.821 1.6 2 CLIP BODY WORN WITH BELT CLIP 848.3 25.97 Flat 0.302 1.6 3 BODY WORN WITH BELT 1851.25 26.24 Flat 0.943 1.6 4 CLIP BODY WORN WITH BELT 1880 26.14 Flat 1.46 1.6 5 CLIP BODY WORN WITH BELT CLIP 1908.75 26.27 Flat 1.31 1.6 6 Report#R0607263S Page 24 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D APPENDIX A – MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY The uncertainty budget has been determined for the DASY4 measurement system and is given in the following Table. Report#R0607263S Page 25 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

DASY4 Uncertainty Budget According to CENELECEN 50361 [2] Uncotamy Prob: Div. (a) (a | Sid: Th: Sid Ure: (n) Eizor Deseription value Dist is 10« (19) (10)) tagy Measurement Equipment Probe Calibration x 7 To oX & Tidal Totropy r 5 oz |or s19% < Spherical otropy n 3 oz for ' < Probe Emc n OO Cp . Detection Ennit n OO < Domday Eies n OO . Teadon: Electromes x 1 C ~ Teponse Tim x 1 C & Nor x 1 C ~ Tntcsmation Thm x 1 C & Mechanical Constramis Scamig System sou% n <Ou c s Phantom Shell a10% r § |1 1 < "Probe Postioune w2o% n o0 ~ Dovice Postome sra% x 1 To Ts Physical Parameters Liguid Conuetaiy zy 5500 n C oz us ~ Liquid Conduetivity (mons) n 3 oz fos < Tiqud Ponmtimty (reey) n i (os fus & Liquid Pormittivity: (mens.) r Vi oo |os < Pover Drm n OO C < NP Ambiont Conditions n OuCto|5 . Post—Processma Exrap, and Intesrmtion s1o% n @OI t 0s zns — Combmal SUT. Uncertam Eon + mal o Expanded Sid, Unceriainty smy ce

Calibration Laboratory of «C Schsizerischer Kailoerdionat Schmid & Partner innmat Service suiase cétalonnage Engineering AG Servizio sviezero dl taratrn ZReughausstrasse 43, 8004 Zorich, Stzariand Suiss Caltbation Service Accrestnd by ns Swiss Federl Ofice of Metrolcgy and Accredtaton Accredtation No: SCS 108 ‘The Swiss Accrediation Service is one of the signatoris tothe EA Muittateral Agreement for the recogrition of calbration certficates ‘is caltraton certfcat documents he racebity o natonal standarts, wtich realze the physica unts of measuremonts (S1) ‘he measurements ans he unceniinies win confidence probabit aregien on thefolowing pages and ae parof e ceriicats Allcaltrations rave Seen conducted in the clsed laborator facl: envirnment fenperstne (22 3]°C and hy < 70%. Caiteaton Eqiment used (METE crticalfor caliraton) Prmacy Standarts e Cal Date (Caltrtes by. Conticae No) senedul Caltraton I PovermaterEsa1s8 conzsere 005 metas, No.251—0os57) Apear — Poversersor E44T2A mveresserr 4008 guetas, No. 25—00557) Apear Posersersor E4412A mvetasensr sapros wetas, no. 2s—00s57) Apear | Reterence 3 68 Atercster sn ssose ae) 11—209.08 metas, ho. 251—00100) Aoos Rateunce 20 8 Atensator sc ssoss 2oe) «Apr0s metas, no. 25t—005se) Apror | Reterence 20 8 Atarsator sh: serze oo 11—809.08 metas, ho. 251—00500) Aupos Reference Prote ESsOV2 sn aors 2Jan.96 (GPEAG. No. E832012lnce) Jnar caee sicese 25e008 (SPEAG, No act—ase_Febos) revar Secondary Sancarts EB Check Date n hause) sereduied Check RF gereraor no seiec usseausrco +409 (GPGAG,in hovae check 0%) inhouse chock NovaT | Network Anaiyzer P 8753E ussrasoses 18—09t01 (SFEAG,inhouse check Nov08) Inhouse check: NovO6 | Caierai by: Cericate No: E73—1604_Ma,06 Page 1 o9

Calibration Laboratory of Sctwaizerischer Kaiiordianst Schmid & Partner Service suiase o‘ttalonnage Engineering AG Serviio avizzero oi tarnturn Zeughausstrasse 43 8004 Zurich, Switzerind Swiss Galbration Service Accredtas by ho Sniss Federal Offce of Metology and Accredtatin Aceredation No:: SCS 108 ‘Tne Swiss Accredtation Service is one of th signatories to the EA Muittateral Agreement fo the recognition of calbraion certicates Glossary: TSL tissue simulating liquid NORMxy.z sensitivity in free space ConF sensitivity in TSL / NORMxy.z DCP diode compression point Polarization q © rotation around probe axis Polarization 8 3 rotation around an axis that is in the plane normal to probe axis (at measurement center), ie., 8 = 0 is normal to probeaxis Calibration is Performed According to the Following Standards: a) IEEE Std 1528—2003, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial— Averaged Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques", December 2003 b) CENELEC EN 50361, "Basic standard for the measurement of Specific Absorption Rate related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields from mobile phones (300 MHz — 3 GHz), July 2001 Methods Applied and Interpretation of Parameters: + NORMxy,z: Assessed for E—field polarization 8 = 0 (f < 900 MHz in TEM—cell; £> 1800 MHz: R22 waveguide). NORMx.y,z are only intermediate values, i.e., the uncertainties of NORMxy,z does not effect the E*—field uncertainty inside TSL (see below ConvF). + NORM(Ax.y.z NORMxy,z * frequency_response (see Frequency Response Chart). This linearization is implemented in DASY4 software versionslater than 4.2. The uncertainty of the frequency response is included in the stated uncertainty of ConvF. + DCPx,y,z: DCP are numerical linearization parameters assessed based on the data of power sweep (no uncertainty required). DCP does not depend on frequency nor media. * ConvF and Boundary Effect Parameters: Assessed in fat phantom using E—field (or Temperature Transfer Standard for f < 800 MHz) and inside waveguide using analytical field distributions based on power measurements for f > 800 MHz. The same setups are used for assessment of the parameters applied for boundary compensation (alpha, depth) of which typical uncertainty values are given. These parameters are used in DASY4 software to improveprobe accuracy close to the boundary. The sensitivity in TSL corresponds to NORMxy,z * ConvF whereby the uncertainty corresponds to that given for ConvF. A frequency dependent Conv is used in DASY version 4.4 and higher which allows extending the validity from + 50 MHz to + 100 MHz. * Spherical isotropy (3D deviation from isotropy); in a field of low gradients realized using a flat phantom exposed by a patch antenna. * Sensor Offset: The sensor offset corresponds to the offset of virtual measurementcenter from the probe tip (on probe axis). No tolerance required. Cenificate No: ET3—1504_May0$ Page 2 0t 9

ET3DV6 SN:1604 May 2, 2006 Probe ET3DVGC6 SN:1604 Manufactured: July 30, 2001 Last calibrated: March 18, 2005 Recalibrated: May 2, 2006 Calibrated for DASY Systems (Note: non—compatibe with DASY2 system!} Ceniicate No: ET3—1604_MayO6 Page 3 of 0

ET3DV6 SN:1604 May 2, 2006 DASY — Parameters of Probe: ET3DV6 SN:1604 Sensitivity in Free Space"® Diode Compression® NormxX 187 a10.1% pVi(Vim)® DCP X 93 mV NormY 1.80 £10.1% uVi(Vim® DCP Y 93 mV Normz 191 s 101% uVi(Vim)" por z 93 mV Sensitivity in Tissue Simulating Liquid (Conversion Factors) Please see Page 8. Boundary Effect Tst 900 MHz Typical SAR gradient: 5 % per mm Sensor Center to Phantom Surface Distance 3.7 mm 47 mm SARs. [ Without Correction Algonthm 79 41 SAR., [] With Correction Algorthm o1 o2 Tst 1810 MHz. Typical SAR gradient: 10 % per mm Sensor Center to Phantom Surface Distance 3.7 mm 4.7 mm SAR.. DK] Without Correction Algorthm 70 41 SARs. Dsl With Correction Algorithm 0.1 02 Sensor Offset Probe Tip to Sensor Center 2.7 mm The reported uncertainty of measurement is stated as the standard uncertainty of imeasurement multiplied by the coverage factor k=2, which for a normal distribution (corresponds to a coverage probability of approximately 95%. * The unceraintes of NomXY.Z do notafecthe Eid uncertainy inaide TSL (see Page 0) * Nomeral ineareason paramater unonriiny ns eaured Certfcate No: E3—1604_May6 Page 4 of 9

ET3DV6 SN:1604 May 2, 2006 Frequency Response of E—Field (TEM—Cell:if110 EXX, Waveguide: R22) 1s — —— — 14 —. i 13 Frequency response (normalized) s ce —|— o8 4 or —— ~—— as — as —— — L 1 o so 1000 1800 2000 2500 3000 t un —o—rem —o—nze Uncertainty of Frequency Response of E—field: 2 6.3% (k=Z) Certiicate No: ET9—1604_May06 Page 5 or 0

ET3DV6 SN:1604 May 2, 2006 Receiving Pattern (¢), 8 = 0° £= 600 MHz, TEM if110EXX £=1800 MHz, WG R22 <e—x <o—y <#—20 —0—Tat Error {d8) Uncertainty of Axial Isotropy Assessment: 2 0.5% (k=2) Certfcate No: E73— 1604Mayo6 Page Sot 0

ET3DV6 SN:1604 May 2, 2006 Dynamic Range f(SARneaq) (Waveguide R22, f = 1800 MHz) input Signal fav) Error {dB] o00t cor 0 1 10 100 SAR [riiem] Uncertainty of Lineaity Assessment: £.0.6% (k=2) Cerifcate No: ET3—1604_Mayos Page 7 of0

ET3DVG SN:1604 May 2, 2006 Conversion Factor Assessment 1= 900 MHz, WGLS R9 (head) 1= 1810 MHiz, WGLS R22 (head) t 300 35 30 250 & 25 E 200 E & 150 &Eis & 8 i0 § o os : so ae 1—L_—‘ so pubte) Validity [MiHz]® tst. Permittvity Conductivity Alpha Dopth ConvE Uncertainty 450 +s0/2100 Head 435 25% 0.8725% ore 206 T14 £133%(c2) 800 £50/2100 Head 41.525% 0.9725% ose 181 660 £11.0%(e2) 1810 +50/2100 Head 40.05% 14025% oso 25e 520 £11.0%(c2) 2450 £50/2100 Head 39.225% 18025% oss 185 460 £11.8%(e2) 4so +50/2100 Boty se.7a5% 09425% o2s 444 742. £13.3% (c2) 800 +50/2100 Bocy 55.015% 1.0525% o4r 208 627 £11.0% (c2) 1810 50/2100 Body §3.315% 1.5225% ose 286 488 211.0% (n2) 2450 £50/2100 Bogy 52.7%5% 1.9525% oss 185 427 211.8%(k2) ® the vality o2 100 Mit only applles for DASY v6.t and Nigher (see Page 2 The uncertaint is t RSS w the Cone® uncertainy at caltration regueney and the uneertainyfor the indlcate trequency band. Page 8 0(9


Document Created: 2006-08-28 18:03:13
Document Modified: 2006-08-28 18:03:13
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC