Ex 2 Part 95 Rpt

FCC ID: OU5340MT

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_155207

Intertek Testing Services ETL SEMKO & FCC Part 95 (H) Test Report for GE Medical Systems on the WMTS Transmitter Model: 342MCCN—XXX FCC ID: OUS340MT Job No: J20046260 Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 Report No.: 20462601 Date of Report: May 25, 2001 nviad im /!’,———'--.\\ NVLAP Laboratory Code: 200201—0 .| Tested by: ! x Suresh Kondapalli Review Date: . F Reyiewer: | David Chernomordik, Ph.D. Review Date: e c:(lfi,l//:fl/' %“OHAMZ EMC Site Manager 5—/?//0/' Accreditation logos in this area if any apply to testing reported. Note that limitations on scope of accreditation must be stated. For example, NIST Handbook 150, section 285.8, requires: "Use of the NVLAP logo...should be accompanied by the following: "Accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for the specific scope of accreditation under Lab Code 200201—0." All services undertaken are subject to the following general policy: Reports are submitted for exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed. Their significance is subject to the adequacy and representative character of the samples and to the comprehensiveness of the tests, examinations or surveys made. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written consent of Intertek Testing Services, NA Inc. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP, NIST nor any other agency of the U.S. Government. € b Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc. 1365 Adams Court, Mento Park, CA 94025 Telephone 650—463—2900 Fax 650—463—2910 Home Page www.etisemko.com Liste?

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Job Description....................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Client Information ....................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Equipment under test (EUT) ........................................................................................ 2 1.3 Test plan reference....................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Description of the EUT................................................................................................ 3 1.5 System test configuration............................................................................................. 4 1.5.1 System block diagram & Support equipment ................................................... 4 1.6 Justification ................................................................................................................. 5 1.7 Mode(s) of operation ................................................................................................... 5 1.8 Modifications required for compliance......................................................................... 5 2.0 Test Summary ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 RF Power Output ................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Test Description........................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Test Procedure............................................................................................................. 7 3.3 Test Results ................................................................................................................. 7 4.0 Occupied Bandwidth, Necessary Bandwidth......................................................................... 9 4.1 Test Description........................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Test Procedure............................................................................................................. 9 4.3 Test Results ................................................................................................................. 9 5.0 Spurious emissions at antenna terminal .............................................................................. 12 5.1 Test description ......................................................................................................... 12 5.2 Test Procedure........................................................................................................... 12 5.3 Test Result................................................................................................................. 12 6.0 Field Strength of Radiated Emissions.................................................................................. 16 6.1 Test description ......................................................................................................... 16 6.2 Test Procedure........................................................................................................... 16 6.3 Test Results ............................................................................................................... 16 7.0 Frequency Stability .............................................................................................................. 19 7.1 Test description ......................................................................................................... 19 7.2 Test Procedure........................................................................................................... 19 7.2.1 Frequency Stability vs. Temperature............................................................... 19 7.2.2 Frequency Stability vs. Voltage ..................................................................... 19 7.3 Test Results ............................................................................................................... 20 8.0 List of test equipment........................................................................................................... 21 File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 1 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT 1.0 Job Description 1.1 Client Information The EUT has been tested at the request of: Company: GE Medical Systems 61 Barnes park North, Wallingford, CT 06492 USA Name of contact: Lenny Bienasz Telephone: (203) 949-8225 Fax: (203) 949-2536 1.2 Equipment under test (EUT) Equipment type: WMTS Transmitter Model number(s): 342MCCN-XXX Part or serial number: Not Labeled Manufacturer: SAME as above. Use of Product : Medical Telemetry Production is planned: [X] Yes, [ ] No Technical Specifications: Type of Emission F3D Max. modulation frequency (M) 0.5 kHz Max. Allowed deviation (D) 5 kHz, typically 3 kHz RF Output Power 4 mW Means for variation of operating power Fixed Frequency Range 608 to 614MHz Max. number of Channels 238 Channel separation 25 kHz Antenna Detachable rod antenna External input Ultrasound, ECG and UA File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 2 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT EUT receive date: April 30, 2001 EUT received condition: Good condition prototype Test start date: May 1, 2001 Test end date: May 4, 2001 1.3 Test plan reference FCC Part 2.1093, FCC Part 95 (H) 1.4 Description of the EUT The 340M OB Telemetry System is comprised of a transmitter and receiver to provide an RF link between patient worn transducers and fetal monitor, allowing patient to freely move about while staff monitor fetal heart rate and uterine contractions remotely. File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 3 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT 1.5 System test configuration 1.5.1 System block diagram & Support equipment The diagram shown below details the placement of the equipment under test during the testing U, 2 m Helical Antenna Headset 1 Ultrasound U, 1 m 3 Fetal EUT U, 1 m ECG Simulator 2 U, 1 m UA U, 1 m Remote Push Botton 4 S: Shielded U: Unshield F: With Ferrite Core Item # Description Manufacturer Model No. Serial No. 1 Headset Radio Shack 33.1160 Not Labeled 2 Maternal Fetal Simulator GE 325 Not Labeled 3 5700 Transducer ( Two Corometrics Not Labeled numbers) 4 Remote push button Switch Craft 3919 Not Labeled File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 4 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT 1.6 Justification The system was configured for testing in a typical manner in accordance with ANSI C63.4 standard. During radiated emission testing, the peripheral locations were varied with respect to the EUT to maximize the emissions. 1.7 Mode(s) of operation Transmitting data from patient worn transducer to fetal monitor. 1.8 Modifications required for compliance No modifications were implemented by Intertek Testing Services. File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 5 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT 2.0 Test Summary FCC RULE DESCRIPTION OF TEST RESULT PAGE 2.1046 RF Power Output 5 mW 7 2.1047 Modulation Characteristics Not Applicable - 2.1049 Occupied Bandwidth Passed 9 2.1053 Spurious emissions at antenna Passed 12 terminal 95.1115(a) Field Strength of fundamental Passed 16 95.1115(b) Field Strength of undesired Passed 16 emissions 15.107 AC Line Conducted Not Applicable. - Emissions The EUT is battery operated 2.1055 Frequency Stability 20 Vs. Temperature 0.4 ppm Vs. Voltage 0.12 ppm 2.1093 RF Exposure Passed Separate SAR report File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 6 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT 3.0 RF Power Output 3.1 Test Description Requirement: FCC § 2.1046 RF Output Power 3.2 Test Procedure The antenna was disconnected from the transmitter and a spectrum analyzer was connected to the antenna terminal through a short cable. The output power was read out and the cable loss was setup as OFFSET. In addition, ERP was measured by the substitution method using half-wave dipole (Robert’s antenna). 3.3 Test Results See plot 3.1on the next page. The measured power output is 6.8 dBm (4.8 mW). The maximum ERP measured equals 7.2 dBm or 5.2 mW. File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 7 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT Plot 3.1 File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 8 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT 4.0 Occupied Bandwidth, Necessary Bandwidth 4.1 Test Description Requirement: FCC §2.1049 Emission Bandwidth: <11 kHz 4.2 Test Procedure The antenna was disconnected from the transmitter and the short cable was connected to the transmitter RF output. The RF output was connected to the input of the spectrum analyzer. The resolution bandwidth of the spectrum analyzer was setup at least 10 times higher then the necessary bandwidth of the transmitter. The spectrum analyzer reading obtained is used as a reference for occupied bandwidth measurements. The resolution bandwidth of the spectrum analyzer was setup to 100 Hz and the spectrum of the transmitting signal was recorded. 4.3 Test Results See on the following pages the occupied bandwidth plots: Plot Number Description 4.1 Reference level 4.2 20-dB bandwidth The Necessary Bandwidth was calculated using the formula: B = 2 × (M +D), Where M is the highest modulation frequency, D is the deviation. As per 342MCCN-XXX specification, M=0.5 kHz, D=5 kHz. Therefore B=11 kHz. File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 9 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT Plot 4.1 File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 10 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT Plot 4.2 File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 11 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT 5.0 Spurious emissions at antenna terminal 5.1 Test description Parameter: FCC §2.1051 Requirement: 5.2 Test Procedure The test was performed according the procedure outlined in ANSI C63.4 Standard. The antenna was disconnected from the transmitter and a spectrum analyzer was connected to the antenna terminal through a short cable. The cable loss was setup as OFFSET. The frequency range up to tenth harmonic of the fundamental frequency was investigated. 5.3 Test Result See plots 5.1 – 5.3 for spurious emissions Data Sheet Number Description 5.1 Conducted Spurious Emissions, 1.0 MHz to 1 GHz 5.2 Conducted Spurious Emissions,1 GHz to 2.4 GHz 5.3 Conducted Spurious Emissions, 2.4 GHz to 10 GHz File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 12 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT Plot 5.1 File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 13 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT Plot 5.2 File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 14 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT Plot 5.3 File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 15 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT 6.0 Field Strength of Radiated Emissions 6.1 Test description Parameter: FCC § 95.1115 Requirement: < 200 mV/m at fundamental frequency, < 500 µV/m undesired radiation 6.2 Test Procedure The test was performed according the procedure outlined in ANSI C63.4 Standard. The transmitter was placed on a wooden turntable. The measurement antenna was placed at a distance of 3 meters from the EUT. During the tests, the antenna height and polarization as well as EUT azimuth were varied in order to identify the maximum level of emissions from the EUT. The frequency range up to tenth harmonic of the fundamental frequency was investigated. 6.3 Test Results Please see the following pages for the test result. Data Sheet Number Description 6.1 Radiated Emissions at Low Channel 608 MHz 6.2 Radiated Emissions at High Channel 614 MHz File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 16 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT Data Sheet 6.1 Radiated Emissions Test Data Company: GE Medical Inc Model #: 340T Standard FCC § 95.1115 EUT: WMTS Transmitter FCC ID # OU340MT Limit Project #: J20042625 Test Date: May 04,20 01 Test Distance 3 meters Test Mode: Transmitter@608.02MHz Engineer: Suresh Duty 0 dB Relaxation Antenna Used Pre-Amp Used Cable Used Transducer Used Number: 8 7 2 2 8 0 21 0 0 0 Model: EMCO EM LPA- EMCO CDI P950 CDI_P1000 None Grn_M+L None None None 3115 25 3143 Frequency Reading Detector Ant Amp. Ant. Pol. Ant. Pre-Amp Insert. D. C. Net Limit Margin . Factor Loss F. @3m MHz dB(µV) P/A/Q # # H/V dB(1/m) dB dB dB dB(µV/m) dB(µV/m) dB 608.02 81.9 Peak 7 0 V 19.1 0.0 1.7 0.0 102.7 106.0 -3.3 1216.04 23.4 Ave. 8 0 V 25.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 50.9 54.0 -3.1 1824.06 51.5 Ave. 8 8 V 26.7 29.3 3.1 0.0 52.0 54.0 -2.0 2432.08 49.3 Ave. 8 8 V 29.1 28.5 2.3 0.0 52.2 54.0 -1.8 3041.00 44.1 Ave. 8 8 V 31.3 28.0 2.5 0.0 49.9 54.0 -4.1 3648.12 40.2 Ave. 8 8 V 33.0 27.8 2.7 0.0 48.1 54.0 -5.9 4256.14 36.5 Ave. 8 8 V 34.5 27.9 2.9 0.0 46.0 54.0 -8.0 4864.16 28.4 Ave. 8 8 V 34.0 28.1 3.2 0.0 37.5 54.0 -16.5 5472.18 28.1 Ave. 8 8 V 35.4 28.3 3.5 0.0 38.7 54.0 -15.3 6080.20 29.0 Ave. 8 8 V 37.1 28.3 3.9 0.0 41.7 54.0 -12.3 Notes: a) D.C.F.:Distance Correction Factor b) Insert. Loss (dB) = Cable A + Cable B + Cable C . c) Net (dB) = Reading + Antenna Factor - Pre-amp + Insert. Loss. - Transducer Loss - Duty Relaxation (transmitter only). d) Negative signs (-) in Margin column signify levels below the limits. e) All other emissions not reported are below the equipment noise floor which is at least 10 dB below the limits. File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 17 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT Data Sheet 6.2 Radiated Emissions Test Data Company: GE Medical Inc Model #: 340T Standard FCC 95.1115 EUT: WMTS Transmitter S/N #: OU340MT Limits Project #: J20042625 Test Date: May 04,20 01 Test Distance_ 3 meters Test Mode: Transmitter@613.97MHz Engineer: Suresh K Duty 0 dB Relaxation Antenna Used Pre-Amp Used Cable Used Transducer Used Number: 8 7 11 2 8 0 21 0 0 0 Model: EMCO EM LPA- LPB-2520A CDI P950 CDI P1000 None Grn_M+L None None None 3115 25 Frequency Reading Detector Ant Amp. Ant. Pol. Ant. Pre-Amp Insert. D. C. Net Limit Margin Factor Loss F. @3m MHz dB(µV) P/A/Q # # H/V dB(1/m) dB dB dB dB(µV/m) dB(µV/m) dB 613.97 84.5 Peak 11 0 V 18.9 0.0 1.7 0.0 105.1 106 -0.9 1227.95 23.3 Ave. 8 0 V 25.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 50.8 54.0 -3.2 1841.92 46.5 Ave. 8 8 V 26.7 29.3 3.1 0.0 47.0 54.0 -7.0 2455.9 41.8 Ave. 8 8 V 29.1 28.5 2.3 0.0 44.7 54.0 -9.3 3069.9 40.2 Ave. 8 8 V 31.3 28.0 2.5 0.0 46.0 54.0 -8.0 3683.8 38.8 Ave. 8 8 V 33.0 27.8 2.7 0.0 46.7 54.0 -7.3 4297.8 36.6 Ave. 8 8 V 34.5 27.9 2.9 0.0 46.1 54.0 -7.9 4911.8 28.8 Ave. 8 8 V 34.0 28.1 3.2 0.0 37.9 54.0 -16.1 5525.7 33.8 Ave. 8 8 V 36.6 28.3 3.7 0.0 45.8 54.0 -8.2 6139.7 30.7 Ave. 8 8 V 37.1 28.3 3.9 0.0 43.4 54.0 -10.6 Notes: a) D.C.F.:Distance Correction Factor b) Insert. Loss (dB) = Cable A + Cable B + Cable C . c) Net (dB) = Reading + Antenna Factor - Pre-amp + Insert. Loss. - Transducer Loss - Duty Relaxation (transmitter only). d) Negative signs (-) in Margin column signify levels below the limits. e) All other emissions not reported are below the equipment noise floor which is at least 10 dB below the limits. File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 18 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT 7.0 Frequency Stability 7.1 Test description Requirement: FCC § 2.1055 Frequency Tolerance: 7.2 Test Procedure The ppm frequency error of the transmitter was calculated by:  MCF  ppm error =  − 1 ⋅ 10 6  ACF  Where MCF is the Measured Carrier Frequency in MHz ACF is the Assigned Carrier Frequency in MHz 7.2.1 Frequency Stability vs. Temperature The equipment under test was connected to an external DC power supply and the RF output was connected to a frequency counter via feedthrough attenuator. The EUT was placed inside the temperature chamber. After the temperature stabilized for approximately 20 minutes, the frequency of the output signal was recorded from the counter. 7.2.2 Frequency Stability vs. Voltage At room temperature (25 ±5 oC), an external variable DC power supply was connected to the EUT. The frequency of the transmitter was measured for 115%, 100% and 85% of the nominal operating input voltage. File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 19 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT 7.3 Test Results Frequency Stability vs Temperature ACF (MHz): 610.999790 Limit: N/A Temperature, C MCF (MHz) PPM Error 50 610.999600 0.19 40 610.999740 0.05 30 610.999710 0.04 20 611.000015 .022 10 611.000190 0.40 0 611.000505 0.40 -10 Unit turned off by thermal sensor - -20 - - AFC (MHz) 611.11 Limit: 2 ppm % Voltage MCF (MHz) PPM Error 115 6.9 610.999823 0.003 100 6.0V 610.999913 0.12 85 5.1 610.999798 0.001 Battery Endpoint 4.0 610.999798 0.001 Maximum frequency deviation equals 0.4 ppm File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 20 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GE Medical Systems., Model No: 342MCCN-XXX Date of Test: May 1 to 10, 2001 FCC ID: OU5340MT 8.0 List of test equipment EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER MODEL SERIAL CAL. CAL. NUMBER NUMBER INTERVAL DUE Spectrum Analyzer w/85650 Hewlett Packard 8566B 2416A00317 12 4/6/02 QP Adapter 2043A00251 Spectrum Analyzer w/8650 Hewlett Packard 8568B 1912A0053 12 2/23/02 QP Adaptor 2521A01021 Spectrum Analyzer Tektronix 2784 B3020108 12 8/4/01 Bi-Log Antenna EMCO 3143 9509-1160 12 6/8/01 Log Periodic Antenna EMCO LPA-25 1079 12 7/05/02 Double-ridged Horn Antenna EMCO 3115 9107-3712 12 3/17/02 Pre-Amplifier CDI P950 ITS009 12 10/6/01 Pre-Amplifier CDI P1000 N/A 12 10/6/01 Power Meter Hewlett Packard 8900D 3607U00673 12 7/31/01 File: 20462601 Version 1.0 Page 21 of 21 FCC Part 95 (H)


Document Created: 2001-06-17 12:18:28
Document Modified: 2001-06-17 12:18:28
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC