14_LOGIC F8G TestRpt JBP

FCC ID: O55242518

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_4032224

Page 1 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E FCC TEST REPORT Test report On Behalf of SWAGTEK. For 2.4 inch 3G Flip Phone Model No.: LOGIC F8G, iSWAG FLIP G, UNONU U8G, UNONU F8G FCC ID: O55242518 Prepared for : SWAGTEK 10205 NW 19th Street, STE 101, Miami, FL 33172 Prepared By : Shenzhen HUAK Testing Technology Co., Ltd. 1F, B2 Building, Junfeng Zhongcheng Zhizao Innovation Park, Fuhai Street, Bao'an District, Shenzhen City, China Date of Test: July 24, 2018~Aug. 22, 2018 Date of Report: Aug. 23, 2018 Report Number: HUAK180803686E

Page 2 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E TEST RESULT CERTIFICATION Applicant’s name ................. : SWAGTEK Address ................................. : 10205 NW 19th Street, STE 101, Miami, FL 33172 Manufacture's Name ............ : SWAGTEK Address ................................. : 10205 NW 19th Street, STE 101, Miami, FL 33172 Product description 2.4 inch 3G Flip Phone Brand Name LOGIC, iSWAG, UNONU Mode Name LOGIC F8G, iSWAG FLIP G, UNONU U8G, UNONU F8G a) All the same except for brand name and model name, the corresponding relationship are as follow: Difference Description b) LOGIC is corresponding LOGIC F8G; iSWAG is corresponding iSWAG FLIP G; UNONU is corresponding UNONU U8G, UNONU F8G Standards ............................. : FCC Rules and Regulations Part 15 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial purposes as long as the Shenzhen HUAK Testing Technology Co., Ltd. is acknowledged as copyright owner and source of the material. Shenzhen HUAK Testing Technology Co., Ltd. takes no responsibility for and will not assume liability for damages resulting from the reader's interpretation of the reproduced material due to its placement and context. Date of Test ........................................... : Date (s) of performance of tests ............. : July 24, 2018~Aug. 22, 2018 Date of Issue .......................................... : Aug. 23, 2018 Test Result .............................................. : Pass Testing Engineer : (Gary Qian) Technical Manager : (Eden Hu) Authorized Signatory : (Jason Zhou)

Page 3 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E Revision Issue Date Revisions Revised By V1.0 Aug. 23, 2018 Initial Issue Jason Zhou

Page 4 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................. 5 2. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ................................................................................................................... 6 3. PRODUCT INFORMATION .............................................................................................................................. 7 4. SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................................................. 8 5. TEST FACILITY ................................................................................................................................................ 9 6. TEST ITEMS AND THE RESULTS ................................................................................................................ 10 7. FCCLINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ................................................................................................... 11 7.1. LIMITS OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST .................................................................................. 11 7.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF TEST SETUP....................................................................................................... 11 7.3. PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ....................................................................... 12 7.4. TEST RESULT OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ...................................................................... 13 8. FCC RADIATED EMISSION TEST ................................................................................................................ 15 8.1. EXCEPT FOR CLASS A DIGITAL DEVICES, THE FIELD STRENGTH OF RADIATED EMISSIONS FROM UNINTENTIONAL RADIATORS AT A DISTANCE OF 3 METERS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE FOLLOWING VALUES: ................................................................................................................................... 15 8.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF TEST SETUP....................................................................................................... 16 8.3. PROCEDURE OF RADIATED EMISSION TEST ..................................................................................... 17 8.4. TEST RESULT OF RADIATED EMISSION TEST .................................................................................... 18 APPENDIX A: PHOTOGRAPHS OF TEST SETUP .......................................................................................... 22

Page 5 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E 1. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION EUT test procedure: 1. Connect EUT and peripheral devices (PC) through USB port. 2. Power on the EUT, use the software to transfer data between EUT and PC. 3. Make sure the EUT operates normally during the test. Test Mode TEST MODE DESCRIPTION NO. TEST MODE DESCRIPTION WORST 1 USB (connection for data transferring) V Note: 1. V means EMI worst mode

Page 6 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E 2. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY Measurement Test Notes Uncertainty Transmitter power conducted ±0.57 dB (1) Transmitter power Radiated ±2.20 dB (1) Conducted spurious emission 9KHz-40 GHz ±2.20 dB (1) Occupied Bandwidth ±0.01ppm (1) Radiated Emission 30~1000MHz ±4.10dB (1) Radiated Emission Above 1GHz ±4.32dB (1) Conducted Disturbance0.15~30MHz ±3.20dB (1) Note: This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2.

Page 7 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E 3. PRODUCT INFORMATION Housing Type Plastic and metal Hardware Version sc7701_barphone Software Version LOGIC_F8G_CLARO_PE_V4.0_31072018 EUT Input Rating DC3.7V by battery or DC 5V by Micro-USB I/O Port Information ( Applicable Not Applicable) I/O Port of EUT I/O Port Type Number Specific Tested With USB 1 - -

Page 8 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E 4. SUPPORT EQUIPMENT Device Type Manufacturer Model Name Serial No. Data Cable Power Cable PC Lenovo Inc. -- -- -- 0.8m Unshielded Adapter Lenovo Inc. -- -- -- 1.25m Unshielded Note: All the above equipment/cables were placed in worse case positions to maximize emission signals during emission test.

Page 9 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E 5. TEST FACILITY Site Shenzhen HUAK Testing Technology Co., Ltd. 1F, B2 Building, Junfeng Zhongcheng Zhizao Innovation Park, Fuhai Street, Bao'an Location District, Shenzhen City, China Designation Number CN1229 Test Firm Registration Number : 616276 TEST EQUIPMENT OF CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST Conducted Emission Shielding Room Test Site (744) Equipment Manufacturer Model Serial Number Calibration Due Receiver R&S ESCI 7 HKE-010 Dec. 28, 2018 LISN R&S ENV216 HKE-002 Dec. 28, 2018 TS+ Rev Conducted test software Tonscend HKE-081 N/A 2.5.0.0 TEST EQUIPMENT OF RADIATED EMISSION TEST Radiated Emission Test Site (966) Name of Equipment Manufacturer Model Serial Number Calibration Due Receiver R&S ESCI-7 HKE-010 Dec. 28, 2018 Spectrum analyzer Agilent N9020A HKE-048 Dec. 28, 2018 Preamplifier EMCI EMC051845SE HKE-015 Dec. 28, 2018 Preamplifier Agilent 83051A HKE-016 Dec. 28, 2018 Loop antenna Schwarzbeck FMZB 1519 B HKE-014 Dec. 28, 2018 Broadband antenna Schwarzbeck VULB 9163 HKE-012 Dec. 28, 2018 Horn antenna Schwarzbeck 9120D HKE-013 Dec. 28, 2018 Antenna Mast Keleto CC-A-4M N/A N/A Position controller Taiwan MF MF7802 HKE-011 Dec. 28, 2018 Radiated test software Tonscend TS+ Rev 2.5.0.0 HKE-082 N/A RF cable Times 381806-001 N/A N/A (9KHz-1GHz) RF cable Times 1-40G HKE-034 Dec. 28, 2018

Page 10 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E 6. TEST ITEMS AND THE RESULTS Test item Test Requirement Test Method Class/Severity Result CONDUCTED FCC Part 15.107 Rules ANSI C63.4:2014 Class B Pass EMISSION RADIATED FCC Part 15.109 Rules ANSI C63.4:2014 Class B Pass EMISSION

Page 11 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E 7. FCCLINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST 7.1. LIMITS OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST Maximum RF Line Voltage Frequency Q.P.( dBuV) Average( dBuV) 150kHz-500kHz 66-56 56-46 500kHz-5MHz 56 46 5MHz-30MHz 60 50 Note: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequency. 2. The limit decreases linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 MHz to 0.50MHz. 7.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF TEST SETUP

Page 12 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E 7.3. PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST (1) The equipment was set up as per the test configuration to simulate typical actual usage per the user’s manual. When the EUT is a tabletop system, a wooden table with a height of 0.8 meters is used and is placed on the ground plane as per ANSI C63.4 (see Test Facility for the dimensions of the ground plane used). When the EUT is a floor-standing equipment, it is placed on the ground plane which has a 3-12 mm non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane. (2) Support equipment, if needed, was placed as per ANSI C63.4. (3) All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical actual usage as per ANSI C63.4. (4) The EUT received DC5V power from PC with receive AC120V/60Hz power from a LISN. (5) The EUT test program was started. Emissions were measured on each current carrying line of the EUT using a spectrum Analyzer / Receiver connected to the LISN powering the EUT. The LISN has two monitoring points: Line 1 (Hot Side) and Line 2 (Neutral Side). Two scans were taken: one with Line 1 connected to Analyzer / Receiver and Line 2 connected to a 50 ohm load; the second scan had Line 1 connected to a 50 ohm load and Line 2 connected to the Analyzer / Receiver. (6) Analyzer / Receiver scanned from 150 kHz to 30MHz for emissions in each of the test modes. (7) During the above scans, the emissions were maximized by cable manipulation. (8) A scan was taken on both power lines, Line 1 and Line 2, recording at least the six highest emissions. (9) Emission frequency and amplitude were recorded into a computer in which correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare reading to the applicable limit. If EUT emission level was less –2dB to the A.V. limit in Peak mode, then the emission signal was re-checked using Q.P and Average detector. The test data of the worst case condition (mode 1) was reported on the Summary Data page.

Page 13 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E 7.4. TEST RESULT OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST-L

Page 14 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST-N RESULT: PASS

Page 15 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E 8. FCC RADIATED EMISSION TEST 8.1. EXCEPT FOR CLASS A DIGITAL DEVICES, THE FIELD STRENGTH OF RADIATED EMISSIONS FROM UNINTENTIONAL RADIATORS AT A DISTANCE OF 3 METERS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE FOLLOWING VALUES: Frequency Distance Maximum Field Strength Limit (MHz) (m) (dBuV/m/ Q.P.) 30~88 3 40.0 88~216 3 43.5 216~960 3 46.0 Above 960 3 54.0 Note: The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequency. 8.1.1 The following table is the setting of spectrum analyzer and receiver: Spectrum Parameter Setting Start ~Stop Frequency 9KHz~150KHz/RB 200Hz for QP Start ~Stop Frequency 150KHz~30MHz/RB 9KHz for QP Start ~Stop Frequency 30MHz~1000MHz/RB 120KHz for QP 1GHz~26.5GHz Start ~Stop Frequency 1MHz/1MHz for Peak, 1MHz/10Hz for Average Receiver Parameter Setting Start ~Stop Frequency 9KHz~150KHz/RB 200Hz for QP Start ~Stop Frequency 150KHz~30MHz/RB 9KHz for QP Start ~Stop Frequency 30MHz~1000MHz/RB 120KHz for QP

Page 16 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E 8.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF TEST SETUP System Diagram of Connections between EUT and Simulators 1-4m EUT 3m Amplifier 0.8 m Spectrum Analyzer RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP ABOVE 1000MHz

Page 17 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E 8.3. PROCEDURE OF RADIATED EMISSION TEST 1. Configure the EUT according to ANSI C63.4. The EUT was placed on the top of the turntable 0.8 meter above ground. The phase center of the receiving antenna mounted on the top of a height-variable antenna tower was placed 3 meters far away from the turntable. 2. Power on the EUT and all the supporting units. The turntable was rotated by 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. 3. The height of the broadband receiving antenna was varied between one meter and four meters above ground to find the maximum emissions field strength of both horizontal and vertical polarization. 4. For each suspected emissions, the antenna tower was scan (from 1 M to 4 M) and then the turntable was rotated (from 0 degree to 360 degrees) to find the maximum reading. 5. Set the test-receiver system to Peak or CISPR quasi-peak Detect Function with specified bandwidth under Maximum Hold Mode. 6. For emissions above 1GHz, use 1MHz RBW and 3MHz VBW for peak reading. Then 1MHz RBW and 3MHz VBW for average reading in spectrum analyzer. The EUT was placed on the top of the turntable 0.8 meter above ground. The phase center of the receiving antenna mounted on the top of a height-variable antenna tower was placed 3 meters far away from the turntable. 7. When the radiated emissions limits are expressed in terms of the average value of the emissions, and pulsed operation is employed, the measurement field strength shall be determined by averaging over one complete pulse train, including blanking intervals, as long as the pulse train does not exceed 0.1 seconds. As an alternative (provided the transmitter operates for longer than 0.1 seconds) or in cases where the pulse train exceeds 0.1 seconds, the measured field strength shall be determined from the average absolute voltage during a 0.1 second interval during which the field strength is at its maximum values. 8.If the emissions level of the EUT in peak mode was 3 dB lower than the average limit specified, then testing will be stopped and peak values of EUT will be reported, otherwise, the emissions which do not have 3 dB margin will be repeated one by one using the quasi-peak method for below 1GHz. 9. If the emission level of the EUT in peak mode was 10 dB lower than the limit specified, then testing could be stopped and the peak values of the EUT would be reported. Otherwise the emissions that did not have 10 dB margin would be re-tested one by one using peak, quasi-peak or average method as specified and then reported in a data sheet. 10. In case the emission is lower than 30MHz, loop antenna has to be used for measurement and the recorded data should be QP measured by receiver. High - Low scan is not required in this case. 11. The test data of the worst case condition (mode 1) was reported on the Summary Data page.

Page 18 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E 8.4. TEST RESULT OF RADIATED EMISSION TEST RADIATED EMISSION TEST AT 3M DISTANCE-HORIZONTAL RESULT: PASS

Page 19 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E RADIATED EMISSION TEST AT 3M DISTANCE-VERTICAL RESULT: PASS Note: 1.Measurement = Reading + Factor, Over = Measurement – Limit. 2. The “Factor” value can be calculated automatically by software of measurement system.

Page 20 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E RADIATED EMISSION ABOVE 1GHZ (1-10TH HARMONICS) –HORIZONTAL

Page 21 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E RADIATED EMISSION ABOVE 1GHZ (1-10TH HARMONICS) –VERTICAL Note: 1. Emissions range from 6GHz to 12.5GHz have 20dB margin. No recording in the test report. 2. Factor=Antenna Factor + Cable loss - Amplifier gain, Margin=Measurement-Limit. 3. The “Factor” value can be calculated automatically by software of measurement system.

Page 22 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E APPENDIX A: PHOTOGRAPHS OF TEST SETUP FCC LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST SETUP FCC RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP

Page 23 of 23 Report No.: HUAK180803686E FCC RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP ----END OF REPORT----


Document Created: 2018-10-09 15:24:32
Document Modified: 2018-10-09 15:24:32
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC