SAR Report Part I

FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_372301

SAR EVALUATION REPORT For High Tech Computer, Corp. 23, Hsin-Hua Rd., Taoyuan, 330, Taiwan FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 2003-08-26 This Report Concerns: Equipment Type: Original Report Hybrid Cordless/Cellular Phone Test Engineer: Eric Hong / Report No.: R0307183S Test Date: 2003-08-13 / 2003-08-21 Reviewed By: Ling Zhang / Prepared By: Bay Area Compliance Laboratory Corporation 230 Commercial Street Sunnyvale, CA 94085 Tel: (408) 732-9162 Fax: (408) 732 9164 Note: This test report is specially limited to the above client company and the product model only. It may not be duplicated without prior written consent of Bay Area Compliance Laboratory Corporation. This report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................................................4 1 - REFERENCE ...........................................................................................................................................................5 2 - TESTING EQUIPMENT.........................................................................................................................................6 2.1 EQUIPMENTS LIST & CALIBRATION INFO ...............................................................................................................6 2.2 EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE ...............................................................................................................6 3 - EUT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................................14 3.1 EUT DESCRIPTION ...............................................................................................................................................14 3.2 ACCESSORIES INFORMATION................................................................................................................................14 4 - SYSTEM TEST CONFIGURATION...................................................................................................................15 4.1 JUSTIFICATION .....................................................................................................................................................15 4.2 EUT EXERCISE PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................................15 4.3 EQUIPMENT MODIFICATIONS ...............................................................................................................................15 5 – CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER MEASUREMENTS ...................................................................................16 5.1 PROVISION APPLICABLE .......................................................................................................................................16 5.2 TEST PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................................................16 5.3 TEST EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................................................................16 5.4 TEST RESULTS .....................................................................................................................................................16 6 - DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SETUP...............................................................................................................20 6.1 MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM .....................................................................................................................21 6.2. SYSTEM COMPONENTS ........................................................................................................................................22 6.3 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ............................................................................................................................26 7 - EVALUATION PROCEDURE.............................................................................................................................27 7.1 SAR EVALUATION PROCEDURE ...........................................................................................................................27 7.2 EXPOSURE LIMITS ................................................................................................................................................28 7.3 SIMULATED TISSUE LIQUID PARAMETER CONFIRMATION ...................................................................................28 7.4 SAR MEASUREMENT ...........................................................................................................................................28 7.5 SYSTEM ACCURACY VERIFICATION .....................................................................................................................29 7.6 LIQUID MEASUREMENT RESULT ..........................................................................................................................30 8 - SAR TEST RESULTS............................................................................................................................................34 8.1 SAR BODY AND HEAD WORST-CASE TEST DATA ...............................................................................................34 8.2 PLOTS OF TEST RESULT .......................................................................................................................................35 EXHIBIT A - SAR SETUP PHOTOGRAPHS .........................................................................................................50 SV10A BODY WORN, BACK TOUCHING FLAT PHANTOM WITH HEADSET AND BELT CLIP ........................................50 SV10A BODY WORN, BACK TOUCHING FLAT PHANTOM WITH HEADSET .................................................................50 SV10A BODY WORN, FACE TOUCHING FLAT PHANTOM WITH HEADSET AND BELT CLIP ........................................51 SV10A BODY WORN, FACE TOUCHING FLAT PHANTOM WITH HEADSET..................................................................51 GPRS – BODY WORN, BACK TOUCHING WITH PHANTOM WITH SERIAL CABLE........................................................52 GPRS – BODY WORN, BACK TOUCHING WITH PHANTOM .........................................................................................52 SV10A LEFT HEAD, CHEEK ......................................................................................................................................53 SV10A LEFT HEAD, TILTED ......................................................................................................................................53 SV10A RIGHT HEAD, CHEEK ....................................................................................................................................54 SV10A RIGHT HEAD, TILTED ....................................................................................................................................54 SV10B LEFT HEAD, CHEEK.......................................................................................................................................55 SV10B LEFT HEAD, TILTED ......................................................................................................................................55 SV10B RIGHT HEAD, CHEEK ....................................................................................................................................56 SV10B RIGHT HEAD, TILTED ....................................................................................................................................56 EXHIBIT B – EUT PHOTOGRAPHS ......................................................................................................................57 EUT – SV10A TOP VIEW ..........................................................................................................................................57 EUT – SV10A REAR VIEW .......................................................................................................................................57 EUT – SV10A REAR VIEW WITHOUT BATTERY ........................................................................................................58 EUT – SV10A CHASSIS COVER OFF VIEW ...............................................................................................................58 EUT – SV10A KEYPAD FRONT VIEW .......................................................................................................................59 EUT – SV10A KEYPAD REAR VIEW .........................................................................................................................59 Report #R0307183S.doc Page 2 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER EUT – SV16A DYNAPACK BATTERY FRONT VIEW...................................................................................................60 EUT – SV16A DYNAPACK BATTERY REAR VIEW ....................................................................................................60 EUT – SV16A SAMSUNG SDI BATTERY FRONT VIEW .............................................................................................61 EUT – SV16A SAMSUNG SDI BATTERY REAR VIEW ...............................................................................................61 EUT – SV10A BEZEL FRONT VIEW ..........................................................................................................................62 EUT – SV10A BEZEL REAR VIEW ............................................................................................................................62 EUT – SV10B TOP VIEW ..........................................................................................................................................63 EUT – SV10B REAR VIEW........................................................................................................................................63 EUT – SV10B REAR VIEW WITHOUT BATTERY ........................................................................................................64 EUT – SV10B CHASSIS COVER OFF VIEW ................................................................................................................64 EUT – SV10B KEYPAD FRONT VIEW .......................................................................................................................65 EUT – SV10B KEYPAD REAR VIEW .........................................................................................................................65 EUT – SV16B DYNAPACK BATTERY FRONT VIEW ...................................................................................................66 EUT – SV16B DYNAPACK BATTERY REAR VIEW.....................................................................................................66 EUT – SV16B SAMSUNG SDI BATTERY FRONT VIEW ..............................................................................................67 EUT – SV16B SAMSUNG SDI BATTERY REAR VIEW ...............................................................................................67 EUT – SV10B BEZEL FRONT VIEW...........................................................................................................................68 EUT – SV10B BEZEL REAR VIEW ............................................................................................................................68 EUT SV10A/SV10B – COMPONENT VIEW ...............................................................................................................69 EUT SV10A/SV10B – COMPONENT VIEW WITH SHIELD ..........................................................................................69 EUT SV10A/SV10B – COMPONENT VIEW WITHOUT SHIELD 1 ................................................................................70 EUT SV10A/SV10B – COMPONENT VIEW WITHOUT SHIELD 2 ................................................................................70 EUT SV10A/SV10B – LCD DISPLAY VIEW .............................................................................................................71 DELTA ADAPTER VIEW ............................................................................................................................................71 PHIHONG ADAPTER VIEW .......................................................................................................................................72 USB CRADLE VIEW ...................................................................................................................................................72 RS-232 CRADLE VIEW...............................................................................................................................................73 EARPHONE VIEW........................................................................................................................................................73 USB CABLE VIEW .....................................................................................................................................................74 RS-232 CABLE VIEW .................................................................................................................................................74 POUCH VIEW ..............................................................................................................................................................75 EXHIBIT C – Z-AXIS.................................................................................................................................................76 Report #R0307183S.doc Page 3 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER SUMMARY The US Federal Communications Commission has released the report and order “Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of RF Radiation", ET Docket No. 93-62 in August 1996 [1]. The order requires routine SAR evaluation prior to equipment authorization of portable transmitter devices, including portable telephones. For consumer products, the applicable limit is 1.6 mW/g as recommended by the ANSI/IEEE standard C95.1-1992 [6] for an uncontrolled environment (Paragraph 65). According to the Supplement C of OET Bulletin 65 “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guide-lines for Human Exposure to Radio frequency Electromagnetic Fields", released on Jun 29, 2001 by the FCC, the device should be evaluated at maximum output power (radiated from the antenna) under “worst-case” conditions for normal or intended use, incorporating normal antenna operating positions, device peak performance frequencies and positions for maximum RF energy coupling. This report describes the methodology and results of experiments performed on wireless data terminal. The objective was to determine if there is RF radiation and if radiation is found, what is the extent of radiation with respect to safety limits. SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) is the measure of RF exposure determined by the amount of RF energy absorbed by human body (or its parts) – to determine how the RF energy couples to the body or head which is a primary health concern for body worn devices. The limit below which the exposure to RF is considered safe by regulatory bodies in North America is 1.6 mW/g average over 1 gram of tissue mass. The test configurations were laid out on a specially designed test fixture to ensure the reproducibility of measurements. Each configuration was scanned for SAR. Analysis of each scan was carried out to characterize the above effects in the device. There was no SAR of any concern measured on the device for any of the investigated configurations. Summary of the Worst Case SAR values for head and body: Ambient Temperature (ºC): 23.0 Relative Humidity (%): 53 Output Notes / Frequency Test Measured Limit Power Liquid Phantom Accessories Plot # Position (MHz) Type (mW/g) (mW/g) Model (dBm) Right SV10A Head, Tilted 1880 29.27 Face-held Head Flat None 0.198 1.6 10 Body Back Body SV10A Touching 1880 29.27 worn Body Flat Headset 0.779 1.6 2 Report #R0307183S.doc Page 4 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 1 - REFERENCE [1] Federal Communications Commission, \Report and order: Guidelines for evaluating the environmental effects of radiofrequency radiation", Tech. Rep. FCC 96-326, FCC, Washington, D.C. 20554, 1996. [2] David L. Means Kwok Chan, Robert F. Cleveland, \Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields", Tech. Rep., Federal Communication Commission, O_ce of Engineering & Technology, Washington, DC, 1997. [3] Thomas Schmid, Oliver Egger, and Niels Kuster, \Automated E-_eld scanning system for dosimetric assessments", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, pp. 105{113, Jan. 1996. [4] Niels Kuster, Ralph K.astle, and Thomas Schmid, \Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications equipment with known precision", IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, pp. 645{652, May 1997. [5] CENELEC, \Considerations for evaluating of human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from mobile telecommunication equipment (MTE) in the frequency range 30MHz - 6GHz", Tech. Rep., CENELEC, European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization, Brussels, 1997. [6] ANSI, ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992: IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, NY 10017, 1992. [7] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \Robust setup for precise calibration of E-field probes in tissue simulating liquids at mobile communications frequencies", in ICECOM _ 97, Dubrovnik, October 15{17, 1997, pp. 120-24. [8] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \E-field probe with improved isotropy in brain simulating liquids", in Proceedings of the ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, 23{25 June, 1996, pp. 172-175. [9] Volker Hombach, Klaus Meier, Michael Burkhardt, Eberhard K. uhn, and Niels Kuster, \The depen-dence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 900 MHz", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1865-1873, Oct. 1996. [10] Klaus Meier, Ralf Kastle, Volker Hombach, Roger Tay, and Niels Kuster, \The dependence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 1800 MHz", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Oct. 1997, in press. [11] W. Gander, Computermathematik, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992. [12] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky,W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recepies in C, The Art of Scientific Computing, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 9 [13] NIS81 NAMAS, \The treatment of uncertainity in EMC measurement", Tech. Rep., NAMAS Executive, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, England, 1994. [14] Barry N. Taylor and Christ E. Kuyatt, \Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results", Tech. Rep., National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1994. Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 10 Report #R0307183S.doc Page 5 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 2 - TESTING EQUIPMENT 2.1 Equipments List & Calibration Info Type / Model Cal. Date S/N: DASY3 Professional Dosimetric System N/A N/A Robot RX60L N/A F00/5H31A1/A/01 Robot Controller N/A F01/5J72A1/A/01 Dell Computer Optiplex GX110 N/A N/A Pentium III, Windows NT N/A N/A SPEAG EDC3 N/A N/A SPEAG DAE3 2003-08-26 456 SPEAG E-Field Probe ET3DV6 2003-08-26 1604 SPEAG Dummy Probe N/A N/A SPEAG Generic Twin Phantom N/A N/A SPEAG Light Alignment Sensor N/A 278 SPEAG Validation Dipole D-1800-S-2 2003-11-06 BCL-049 SPEAG Validation Dipole D900V2 2003-09-02 122 Brain Equivalent Matter (800MHz) Daily N/A Brain Equivalent Matter (1900MHz) Daily N/A Muscle Equivalent Matter (800MHz) Daily N/A Muscle Equivalent Matter (1900MHz) Daily N/A Robot Table N/A N/A Phone Holder N/A N/A Phantom Cover N/A N/A HP Spectrum Analyzer HP8593GM 2004-06-20 3009A00791 Microwave Amp. 8349B N/A 2644A02662 Power Meter HP436A 2004-04-02 2709A29209 Power Sensor HP8482A 2004-04-02 2349A08568 Signal Generator RS SMIQ O3 2004-02-10 1084800403 Network Analyzer HP-8753ES 2004-07-30 820079 Dielectric Probe Kit HP85070A N/A N/A Hewlett Packard HP8566B Spectrum Analyzer 2004-07-23 None Hewlett Packard HP 7470A Plotter 2004-07-23 None A.H. System SAS0200 Horn Antenna 2004-07-23 None Com-Power AB-100 Dipole Antenna 2004-07-23 None Agilent E4419b 2004-04-08 GB40202891 Agilent E4412a 2004-04-08 US38486529 2.2 Equipment Calibration Certificate Please see the attached file for detailed information. Report #R0307183S.doc Page 6 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

Schmid & Partner Engineering AG Zeughausstrasse 43, 8004 Zurich, Switzerland, Phone +41 1 245 97 00, Fax +411 245 97 79 Calibration Certificate Dosimetric E—Field Probe Type: ET3DV6 Serial Number: 1604 Place of Calibration: Zurich Date of Calibration: August 26, 2002 Calibration Interval 12 months Schmid & Partner Engineering AG hereby certifies, that this device has been calibrated on the date indicated above. The calibration was performed in accordance with specifications and procedures of Schmid & Partner Engineering AG. Wherever applicable, the standards used in the calibration process are traceable to international standards. In all other cases the standards of the Laboratory for EMF and Microwave Electronicsat the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in Zurich, Switzerland have been applied. Calibrated by | DVeUeQ Approved by %;. ic }

ET3DV6 SN:1604 August 26, 2002 DASY3 — Parameters of Probe: ET3DV6 SN:1604 Sensitivity in Free Space Diode Compression NormX 1.73 uVi(Vim) DCP X 93 mV NormY 1.68 pV/(Vim) DCP Y 93 mV NormZ. 1.72 uVi(Vim)® DCP Z 93 mV Sensitivity in Tissue Simulating Liquid Head 900 MHz s,= 41.5 4 5% & = 0.97 £ 5% mhoim Head 835 MHz a,= 41.5 £5% 0 = 0.90 £ 5% mho/m ConvF X 6.5 £9.5% (k=2) Boundary effect: ConvF Y 6.5 £9.5% (k2) Alpha 0.36 ConvF 2 6.5 £9.5% (k=2) Depth 2.82 Head 1800 MHz a, = 40.0 4 5% 0 = 1.40 £ 5% mhoim Head 1900 MHz a, = 40.0 £ 5% 0 = 1.40 £ 5% mho/m ConvF X 5.5 29.5% (k=2) Boundary effect: Conve Y 5.5 £9.5% (k=2) Aipha 0.50 Conve Z 5.5 £9.5% (k=2) Depth 2.46 Boundary Effect Head 900 MHz Typical SAR gradient: 5 % per mm Probe Tip to Boundary 1 mm 2 mm SARe, [%] Without Correction Algorithm 11.1 6.6 SAR, [%] With Correction Algorithm 0.4 Head 1800 MHz Typical SAR gradient: 10 % per mm Probe Tip to Boundary 1 mm 2 mm SAR;, [%] Without Correction Algorithm 12.3 8.1 SARee [%] With Correction Aigorithm 0.1 0.1 Sensor Offset Probe Tip to Sensor Center 2.7 Optical Surface Detection 1.3 £0.2

Zeughausstrasse 43, 8004 Zurich, Switzerland, Phone +41 1 245 97 00, Fax +41 1 245 97 79 Additional Conversion Factors for Dosimetric E—Field Probe Type ET3DV6 o Serial Number: 1604 ESE Sa2 S Place of Assessment Zurich Date of Assessment: October4, 2002 Probe Calibration Date August 26, 2002 Schmid & Partner Engineering AG hereby certifies that conversion factor(s) of this probe have been evaluated on the date indicated above. The assessment was performed using the FDTD numerical code SEMCAD of Schmid & Partner Engineering AG. Since the evaluation is coupled with measured conversion factors, it has to be recalculated yearly, i.e., following the re—calibration schedule ofthe probe. The uncertainty ofthe nummerical assessmentis based on the extrapolation from measured value at 900 MHz or at 1800 MHz. Assessed by let= Page of 2 October 4, 2002

Conversion factor (+ standard deviation) 835 MHz ConvyP 641 8% 1900 MHz ConyP 4.9 + 8% | | G = 1.52 4 5% mho/m |(body tissue)

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 1900 MHz Body Liquid Validation frequency e' e'' 1850000000.0000 52.1468 13.6437 1852000000.0000 52.1572 13.6648 1854000000.0000 52.1404 13.6777 1856000000.0000 52.1374 13.6946 1858000000.0000 52.1406 13.7104 1860000000.0000 52.1364 13.7291 1862000000.0000 52.1241 13.7202 1864000000.0000 52.1155 13.7492 1866000000.0000 52.0865 13.7449 1868000000.0000 52.0553 13.7280 1870000000.0000 52.0167 13.7495 1872000000.0000 52.0522 13.7543 1874000000.0000 52.0130 13.7809 1876000000.0000 52.0270 13.8169 1878000000.0000 51.9991 13.8076 1880000000.0000 52.0893 13.8634 1882000000.0000 52.0865 13.9203 1884000000.0000 52.0957 13.9281 1886000000.0000 52.0656 13.9142 1888000000.0000 52.0415 13.8284 1890000000.0000 51.9844 13.8228 1892000000.0000 52.0032 13.8720 1894000000.0000 51.9703 13.9021 1896000000.0000 51.9867 13.9035 1898000000.0000 51.9922 13.8894 1900000000.0000 51.9767 13.8825 1902000000.0000 51.9744 13.9275 1904000000.0000 51.9664 13.9094 1906000000.0000 51.9574 13.8932 1908000000.0000 51.9710 13.9030 1910000000.0000 51.8978 13.8863 1912000000.0000 51.9312 13.8985 1914000000.0000 51.9099 13.8847 1916000000.0000 51.9188 13.8857 1918000000.0000 51.9093 13.8903 1920000000.0000 51.8846 13.8339 1922000000.0000 51.9188 13.8890 1924000000.0000 51.8914 13.9003 1926000000.0000 51.9257 13.8753 1928000000.0000 51.9374 13.8804 1930000000.0000 51.9030 13.8947 1932000000.0000 51.8919 13.8739 1934000000.0000 51.9343 13.8806 1936000000.0000 51.9352 13.9181 1938000000.0000 51.8916 13.8943 1940000000.0000 51.8903 13.9512 1942000000.0000 51.9290 13.9234 1944000000.0000 51.9165 13.9252 1946000000.0000 51.8855 13.9148 1948000000.0000 51.8781 13.9250 1950000000.0000 51.8755 13.9279 σ = ω εo ε” = 2 π f εo ε”=1.467 where f = 1900 x 106 εo = 8.854 x 10-12 ε” = 13.8825 Report #R0307183S.doc Page 11 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 1900 MHz Body Liquid Validation frequency e' e'' 1850000000.0000 38.8104 12.8589 1852000000.0000 38.7583 12.9187 1854000000.0000 38.7270 12.9153 1856000000.0000 38.6882 12.8912 1858000000.0000 38.6821 12.8543 1860000000.0000 38.7305 12.8899 1862000000.0000 38.6926 12.9372 1864000000.0000 38.7076 12.9144 1866000000.0000 38.7300 12.9486 1868000000.0000 38.7189 12.9855 1870000000.0000 38.7372 13.0484 1872000000.0000 38.6829 13.0802 1874000000.0000 38.6939 13.0831 1876000000.0000 38.6851 13.1097 1878000000.0000 38.6265 13.1761 1880000000.0000 38.6714 13.2342 1882000000.0000 38.6560 13.2169 1884000000.0000 38.6511 13.2901 1886000000.0000 38.6513 13.3141 1888000000.0000 38.6119 13.3188 1890000000.0000 38.6226 13.3721 1892000000.0000 38.5885 13.3887 1894000000.0000 38.6009 13.4740 1896000000.0000 38.5915 13.5236 1898000000.0000 38.5980 13.5476 1900000000.0000 38.6114 13.5487 1902000000.0000 38.6190 13.5494 1904000000.0000 38.5309 13.5490 1906000000.0000 38.5578 13.5765 1908000000.0000 38.5197 13.5638 1910000000.0000 38.5209 13.5815 1912000000.0000 38.5089 13.5727 1914000000.0000 38.5153 13.6080 1916000000.0000 38.5495 13.6010 1918000000.0000 38.5053 13.5663 1920000000.0000 38.5108 13.5552 1922000000.0000 38.4933 13.5433 1924000000.0000 38.4975 13.5278 1926000000.0000 38.5159 13.5187 1928000000.0000 38.4763 13.4830 1930000000.0000 38.4852 13.4604 1932000000.0000 38.4735 13.4072 1934000000.0000 38.4600 13.4084 1936000000.0000 38.4633 13.3800 1938000000.0000 38.4674 13.3260 1940000000.0000 38.4688 13.3106 1942000000.0000 38.4685 13.3022 1944000000.0000 38.4671 13.2396 1946000000.0000 38.4722 13.2428 1948000000.0000 38.4448 13.1882 1950000000.0000 38.4557 13.1915 σ = ω εo ε” = 2 π f εo ε”=1.432 where f = 1900x 106 εo = 8.854 x 10-12 ε” = 13.5487 Report #R0307183S.doc Page 12 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 1900 MHz Head Liquid Validation frequency e' e'' 1850000000.0000 38.7533 13.7830 1852000000.0000 38.7817 14.1419 1854000000.0000 38.7702 14.1426 1856000000.0000 38.7305 13.8557 1858000000.0000 38.7235 13.6678 1860000000.0000 38.7211 13.7936 1862000000.0000 38.8595 13.9468 1864000000.0000 38.8657 13.7959 1866000000.0000 38.7849 13.8686 1868000000.0000 39.0506 14.5152 1870000000.0000 38.8236 13.9253 1872000000.0000 38.7233 13.8415 1874000000.0000 38.6573 14.0059 1876000000.0000 38.4289 13.6667 1878000000.0000 38.3921 13.6830 1880000000.0000 38.5533 13.8604 1882000000.0000 38.4394 13.8507 1884000000.0000 38.4484 13.8060 1886000000.0000 38.4041 13.8597 1888000000.0000 38.6090 14.1384 1890000000.0000 38.2964 13.8141 1892000000.0000 38.1283 13.6520 1894000000.0000 38.2242 13.7749 1896000000.0000 38.2858 13.8966 1898000000.0000 38.1384 13.8307 1900000000.0000 38.0198 13.7174 1902000000.0000 37.9049 13.6559 1904000000.0000 37.8718 13.6128 1906000000.0000 37.8999 13.6552 1908000000.0000 37.9586 13.7134 1910000000.0000 38.0083 13.7198 1912000000.0000 37.9212 13.7370 1914000000.0000 37.8890 13.7365 1916000000.0000 37.7829 13.6788 1918000000.0000 37.6958 13.6475 1920000000.0000 37.6238 13.6000 1922000000.0000 37.6972 13.6767 1924000000.0000 37.8117 13.6889 1926000000.0000 37.8324 13.7166 1928000000.0000 37.8069 13.6672 1930000000.0000 37.7959 13.6452 1932000000.0000 37.6971 13.5689 1934000000.0000 37.6934 13.5753 1936000000.0000 37.5994 13.5248 1938000000.0000 37.7002 13.5511 1940000000.0000 37.8210 13.6429 1942000000.0000 37.8510 13.6508 1944000000.0000 37.8802 13.6051 1946000000.0000 37.9021 13.6855 1948000000.0000 37.8700 13.6207 1950000000.0000 37.8399 13.5868 σ = ω εo ε” = 2 π f εo ε”=1.45 where f = 1900x 106 εo = 8.854 x 10-12 ε” = 13.7174 Report #R0307183S.doc Page 13 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 3 - EUT DESCRIPTION 3.1 EUT Description Applicant: High Tech Computer, Corp. Product Description: SmartPhone Product Model Number: SV10A/SV10B FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER Serial Number: None Maximum RF Output Power: 29.6 dBm RF Exposure environment: General Population/Uncontrolled Applicable Standard FCC CFR 47, Part 15C & 24 Application Type: Certification 3.2 Accessories Information Manufacturer Description Model HTC USB Cradle SV15 HTC RS-232 Cradle SV15 Eacetech Earphone TS168 HTC USB Cable N/A HTC RS-232 Cable N/A HTC Pouch N/A DELTA AC Adapter ADP-10SB PHIHONG AC Adapter PSC05R-050 Report #R0307183S.doc Page 14 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 4 - SYSTEM TEST CONFIGURATION 4.1 Justification The system was configured for testing in a typical fashion (as normally used by a typical user). 4.2 EUT Exercise Procedure The EUT exercising program used during SAR testing was designed to exercise the various system components in a manner similar to a typical use. 4.3 Equipment Modifications No modification(s) were made by BACL to ensure that the EUT complies with the applicable limits. Report #R0307183S.doc Page 15 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 5 – CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER MEASUREMENTS 5.1 Provision Applicable According to §15.247(b) (3), for systems using digital modulation, the maximum peak output power of the intentional radiator shall not exceed 1 Watt. According to FCC §22.913 (a), the ERP of mobile transmitters and auxiliary test transmitters must not exceed 7 watts. 5.2 Test Procedure The RF output of the transmitter was connected to the input of the spectrum analyzer through sufficient attenuation. 5.3 Test equipment Hewlett Packard HP8564E Spectrum Analyzer, Calibration Due Date: 2004-08-01. Hewlett Packard HP 7470A Plotter, Calibration not required. A.H. Systems SAS200 Horn Antenna, Calibration Due Date: 2004-05-31 Com-Power AB-100 Dipole Antenna, Calibration Due Date: 2003-09-05 5.4 Test Results Model No. Channel Output Power in dBm Output Power in W Limit (W) Low 29.60 0.912 7 SV10A Middle 29.27 0.845 7 High 28.93 0.782 7 Low 29.60 0.912 7 SV10B Middle 29.27 0.845 7 High 28.83 0.764 7 Please refer to the following plots. Report #R0307183S.doc Page 16 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER Report #R0307183S.doc Page 17 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER Report #R0307183S.doc Page 18 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER Report #R0307183S.doc Page 19 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 6 - DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SETUP These measurements were performed with the automated near-field scanning system DASY3 from Schmid & Partner Engineering AG (SPEAG). The system is based on a high precision robot (working range greater than 0.9m) which positions the probes with a positional repeatability of better than ±0.02mm. Special E- and H-field probes have been developed for measurements close to material discontinuity, the sensors of which are directly loaded with a Schottky diode and connected via highly resistive lines to the data acquisition unit. The system is described in detail in [3]. The SAR measurements were conducted with the dosimetric probe ET3DV6 SN: 1577 (manufactured by SPEAG), designed in the classical triangular configuration [3] and optimized for dosimetric evaluation. The probe has been calibrated according to the procedure described in [7] with accuracy of better than ±10%. The spherical isotropy was evaluated with the procedure described in [8] and found to be better than ±0.25dB. The phantom used was the \Generic Twin Phantom” described in [4]. The ear was simulated as a spacer of 4 mm thickness between the earpiece of the phone and the tissue simulating liquid. The Tissue simulation liquid used for each test is in according with the FCC OET65 supplement C as listed below. Ingredients Frequency (MHz) (% by weight) 450 835 915 1900 2450 Tissue Type Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Water 38.56 51.16 41.45 52.4 41.05 56.0 54.9 40.4 62.7 73.2 Salt (Nacl) 3.95 1.49 1.45 1.4 1.35 0.76 0.18 0.5 0.5 0.04 Sugar 56.32 46.78 56.0 45.0 56.5 41.76 0.0 58.0 0.0 0.0 HEC 0.98 0.52 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.21 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Bactericide 0.19 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.27 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Triton x-100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 DGBE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.92 0.0 0.0 26.7 Dielectric Constant 43.42 58.0 42.54 56.1 42.0 56.8 39.9 54.0 39.8 52.5 Conductivity (s/m) 0.85 0.83 0.91 0.95 1.0 1.07 1.42 1.45 1.88 1.78 Report #R0307183S.doc Page 20 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 6.1 Measurement System Diagram The DASY3 system for performing compliance tests consist of the following items: 1. A standard high precision 6-axis robot (Stäubli RX family) with controller and software. 2. An arm extension for accommodating the data acquisition electronics (DAE). 3. A dosimetric probe, i.e., an isotropic E-field probe optimized and calibrated for usage in tissue simulating liquid. The probe is equipped with an optical surface detector system. 4. A data acquisition electronic (DAE), which performs the signal amplification, signal multiplexing, AD-conversion, offset measurements, mechanical surface detection, collision detection, etc. The unit is battery powered with standard or rechargeable batteries. The signal is optically transmitted to the EOC. 5. A unit to operate the optical surface detector, which is connected to the EOC. The Electro-optical coupler (EOC) performs the conversion from the optical into a digital electric signal of the DAE. The EOC is connected to the PC plug-in card. The functions of the PC plug-in card based on a DSP is to perform the time critical task such as signal filtering, surveillance of the robot operation fast movement interrupts. 6. A computer operating Windows 95 or larger 7. DASY3 software 8. Remote control with teaches pendant and additional circuitry for robot safety such as warning lamps, etc. 9. The generic twin phantom enabling testing left-hand and right-hand usage. 10. The device holder for handheld EUT. 11. Tissue simulating liquid mixed according to the given recipes (see Application Note). 12. System validation dipoles to validate the proper functioning of the system. Report #R0307183S.doc Page 21 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 6.2. System Components ET3DV6 Probe Specification Construction Symmetrical design with triangular core Built-in optical fiber for surface detection System Built-in shielding against static charges Calibration In air from 10 MHz to 2.5 GHz In brain and muscle simulating tissue at Frequencies of 450 MHz, 900 MHz and 1.8 GHz (accuracy ± 8%) Frequency 10 MHz to > 6 GHz; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB (30 MHz to 3 GHz) Directivity ± 0.2 dB in brain tissue (rotation around probe axis) ± 0.4 dB in brain tissue (rotation normal probe axis) Dynamic 5 mW/g to > 100 mW/g; Range Linearity: ± 0.2 dB Surface ± 0.2 mm repeatability in air and clear liquids Photograph of the probe Detection over diffuse reflecting surfaces. Dimensions Overall length: 330 mm Tip length: 16 mm Body diameter: 12 mm Tip diameter: 6.8 mm Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7 mm Application General dosimetric up to 3 GHz Compliance tests of mobile phones Fast automatic scanning in arbitrary phantoms The SAR measurements were conducted with the dosimetric probe ET3DV6 designed in the classical triangular configuration and optimized for dosimetric evaluation. The probe is constructed using the thick film technique; with printed resistive lines on ceramic substrates. The probe is equipped with an optical multi-fiber line ending at the front of the probe tip. It is connected to the EOC box on the robot arm and provides an automatic detection of the phantom surface. Half of the fibers are connected to a pulsed infrared transmitter, the other half to a synchronized receiver. As the probe approaches the surface, the reflection from the surface produces a coupling from the transmitting to the receiving fibers. This reflection increases first during the approach, reaches maximum and then decreases. If the probe is flatly touching the surface, the coupling is zero. The distance of the coupling maximum to the surface is independent of the surface reflectivity and largely independent of the surface to probe angle. The DASY3 software reads the reflection during a software approach and looks for the maximum using a 2 nd Inside view of order fitting. The approach is stopped when reaching the maximum. ET3DV6 E-field Probe Report #R0307183S.doc Page 22 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER E-Field Probe Calibration Process Each probe is calibrated according to a dosimetric assessment procedure described in [6] with accuracy better than +/- 10%. The spherical isotropy was evaluated with the procedure described in [7] and found to be better than +/-0.25dB. The sensitivity parameters (NormX, NormY, NormZ), the diode compression parameter (DCP) and the conversion factor (ConvF) of the probe are tested. The free space E-field from amplified probe outputs is determined in a test chamber. This is performed in a TEM cell for frequencies bellow 1 GHz, and in a waveguide above 1 GHz for free space. For the free space calibration, the probe is placed in the volumetric center of the cavity and at the proper orientation with the field. The probe is then rotated 360 degrees. E-field temperature correlation calibration is performed in a flat phantom filled with the appropriate simulated brain tissue. The measured free space E-field in the medium correlates to temperature rise in dielectric medium. For temperature correlation calibration a RF transparent thermistor-based temperature probe is used in conjunction with the E-field probe. Data Evaluation The DASY3 software automatically executes the following procedures to calculate the field units from the microvolt readings at the probe connector. The parameters used in the evaluation are stored in the configuration modules of the software: Probe Parameter: -Sensitivity Normi, ai0, ai1, ai2 -Conversion Factor ConvFi -Diode compression point Dcpi Device parameter: -Frequency f -Crest Factor cf Media parameter: -Conductivity σ -Density ρ These parameters must be set correctly in the software. They can either be found in the component documents or be imported into the software from the configuration files issued for the DASY3 components. In the direct measuring mode of the multi-meter option, the parameters of the actual system setup are used. In the scan visualization and export modes, the parameters stored in the corresponding document files are used. The first step of the evaluation is a linearization of the filtered input signal to account for the compression characteristics of the detector diode. The compensation depends on the input signal, the diode type and the DC-transmission factor from the diode to the evaluation electronics. If the exciting field is pulsed, the crest factor of the signal must be known to correctly compensate for peak power. The formula for each channel can be given as: Vi = Ui + (Ui)2 cf / dcpi With Vi = compensated signal of channel i (i =x, y, z) Ui = input signal of channel i (i =x, y, z) cf = crest factor of exciting field (DASY parameter) dcpi = diode compression point (DASY parameter) Report #R0307183S.doc Page 23 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER From the compensated input signals the primary field data for each channel can be evaluated: With Vi = compensated signal of channel i (i =x, y, z) Normi = sensor sensitivity of channel i (i =x, y, z) µV/ (V/m)2 for E-field probes ConF = sensitivity enhancement in solution aij = sensor sensitivity factors for H-field probes f = carrier frequency [GHz] Ei = electric field strenggy of channel i in V/m Hi = diode compression point (DASY parameter) The RSS value of the field components gives the total field strength (Hermitian magnitude): Etot = Square Root [(Ex)2 + (Ey)2+ (Ez)2] The primary field data are used to calculate the derived field units. SAR = (Etot) 2 ·σ /(ρ ·1000) With SAR = local specific absorption rate in mW/g Etot = total field strength in V/m σ = conductivity in [mho/m] or [Siemens/m] ρ = equivalent tissue density in g/cm3 Note that the density is normally set to 1 (or 1.06), to account for actual brain density rather than the density of the simulation liquid. The power flow density is calculated assuming the excitation field as a free space field. Ppwe = (Etot)2 / 3770 or Ppwe = (Htot)2 · 37.7 With Ppwe = equivalent power density of a plane wave in mW/cm3 Etot = total electric filed strength in V/m Htot = total magnetic filed strength in V/m Report #R0307183S.doc Page 24 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER Generic Twin Phantom The Generic Twin Phantom is constructed of a fiberglass shell integrated in a wooden table. The shape of the shell is based on data from an anatomical study designed to determine the maximum exposure in at least 90% of all users [9][10]. It enables the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand phone usage as well as body mounted usage at the flat phantom region. A cover prevents the evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the Phantom allows the complete setup of all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids by manually teaching three points in the robot. Shell Thickness 2 ± 0.1 mm Filling Volume Approx. 20 liters Dimensions 810 x 1000 x 500 mm (H x L x W) Generic Twin Phantom Device Holder In combination with the Generic Twin Phantom V3.0, the Mounting Device enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter in spherical coordinates whereby the rotation points is the ear opening. The devices can be easily, accurately, and repeatedly positioned according to the FCC and CENELEC specifications. The device holder can be locked at different phantom locations (left head, right head, flat phantom). * Note: A simulating human hand is not used due to the complex anatomical and geometrical structure of the hand that may produced infinite number of configurations [10]. To produce the worst-case condition (the hand absorbs antenna output power), the hand is omitted during the tests. Device Holder Report #R0307183S.doc Page 25 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 6.3 Measurement Uncertainty The uncertainty budget has been determined for the DASY3 measurement system according to the NIS81 [13] and the NIST1297 [14] documents and is given in the following Table. Report #R0307183S.doc Page 26 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 7 - EVALUATION PROCEDURE 7.1 SAR Evaluation Procedure The evaluation was performed with the following procedure: Step 1: Measurement of the SAR value at a fixed location above the ear point or central position was used as a reference value for assessing the power drop. Step 2: The SAR distribution at the exposed side of the head was measured at a distance of 3.9 mm from the inner surface of the shell. The area covered the entire dimension of the head or EUT and the horizontal grid spacing was 20 mm x 20 mm. Based on these data, the area of the maximum absorption was determined by spline interpolation. Step 3: Around this point, a volume of 32 mm x 32 mm x 34 mm was assessed by measuring 5 x 5 x 7 points. On the basis of this data set, the spatial peak SAR value was evaluated under the following procedure: 1. The data at the surface were extrapolated, since the center of the dipoles is 2.7 mm away from the tip of the probe and the distance between the surface and the lowest measuring point is 1.2 mm. The extrapolation was based on a least square algorithm [11]. A polynomial of the fourth order was calculated through the points in z-axes. This polynomial was then used to evaluate the points between the surface and the probe tip. 2. The maximum interpolated value was searched with a straightforward algorithm. Around this maximum the SAR values averaged over the spatial volumes (1 g or 10 g) were computed by the 3D-Spline interpolation algorithm. The 3D-Spline is composed of three onedimensional splines with the “Not a knot"-condition (in x, y and z-directions) [11], [12]. The volume was integrated with the trapezoidal-algorithm. One thousand points (10 x 10 x 10) were interpolated to calculate the average. 3. All neighboring volumes were evaluated until no neighboring volume with a higher average value was found. Step 4: Re-measurement of the SAR value at the same location as in Step 1. If the value changed by more than 5%, the evaluation was repeated. Report #R0307183S.doc Page 27 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 7.2 Exposure Limits Table 1: Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (W/kg) Whole-Body Partial-Body Hands. Wrists. Feet and Ankles 0.4 8.0 20.0 Table 2: Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (W/kg) Whole-Body Partial-Body Hands. Wrists. Feet and Ankles 0.08 1.6 4.0 Note: Whole-body SAR is averaged over the entire body, partial-body SAR is averaged over any 1 gram of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube SAR for hands, writs, feet and ankles is averaged over any 10 grams of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube. Population/Uncontrolled Environments are defined as locations where there is the exposure of individual who have no knowledge or control of their exposure. Occupational/Controlled Environments are defined as locations where there is exposure that may be incurred by people who are aware of the potential for exposure (i.e. as a result of employment or occupation). Population/uncontrolled environments Partial-body limit 1.6W/kg applied to the EUT. 7.3 Simulated Tissue Liquid Parameter Confirmation The dielectric parameters were checked prior to assessment using the HP85070A dielectric probe kit. The dielectric parameters measured are reported in each correspondent section: 7.4 SAR Measurement The SAR measurement was performed with the E-field probe in mechanical detection mode only. The setup and determination of the forward power into the dipole was performed using the following procedures. Report #R0307183S.doc Page 28 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER First, the power meter PM1 (including attenuator Att1) is connected to the cable to measure the forward power at the location of the dipole connector (X). The signal generator is adjusted for the desired forward power at he dipole connector (taking into account the attenuation of Att1) as read by power meter PM2. after connecting the cable to the dipole, the signal generator is readjusted for the same reading at power meter PM2. If the signal generator does not allow adjustment in 0.01dB steps, the remaining difference at PM 2 must be taken into consideration. PM3 records the reflected power from the dipole to ensure that the value is not changed form the previous value. The reflected power should be 20dB below the forward power. The SAR measurements were performed in order to achieve repeatability and to establish an average target value. 7.5 System Accuracy Verification Prior to the assessment, the system validation kit was used to test whether the system was operating within its specifications of ±10%. The validation results are tabulated below. And also the corresponding SAR plot is attached as well in the SAR plots files. IEEE P1528 recommended reference value for head Frequency Local SAR at surface Local SAR at surface 1 g SAR 10 g SAR (MHz) (above feed point) (v=2cm offset from feed point) 300 3.0 2.0 4.4 2.1 450 4.9 3.3 7.2 3.2 835 9.5 6.2 14.1 4.9 900 10.8 6.9 16.4 5.4 1450 29.0 16.0 50.2 6.5 1800 38.1 19.8 69.5 6.8 1900 39.7 20.5 72.1 6.6 2000 41.1 21.1 74.6 6.5 2450 52.4 24.0 104.2 7.7 3000 63.8 25.7 140.2 9.5 Validation Dipole SAR Reference Test Result for Body (1900 MHz) SAR @ 0.126W SAR @ 1W SAR @ 0.126W SAR @ 1W Validation Input averaged Input averaged Input averaged Input averaged Measurement over 1g over 1g over 10g over 10g Test 1 3.1 24.61 1.42 11.27 Test 2 3.1 24.61 1.41 11.20 Test 3 3.2 25.41 1.43 11.35 Test 4 3.2 25.41 1.42 11.27 Test 5 3.1 24.61 1.42 11.27 Test 6 3.2 25.61 1.41 11.20 Test 7 3.2 25.61 1.43 11.35 Test 8 3.1 24.61 1.42 11.27 Test 9 3.1 24.61 1.42 11.27 Test 10 3.1 24.61 1.43 11.35 Average 3.14 24.97 1.421 11.28 Report #R0307183S.doc Page 29 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER 7.6 Liquid Measurement Result Liquid Target Measured Limits Simulant Freq [MHz] Parameters Deviation Temp [ºC] Value Value [%] εr 21.0 39.9 38.6 -3.26 ±5 Head 1900 σ 21.0 1.42 1.43 0.70 ±5 1g SAR 21.0 39.7 41.04 3.38 ±10 εr 22.0 54.0 52.0 -3.7 ±5 Body 1900 σ 22.0 1.45 1.47 1.38 ±5 1g SAR 22.0 24.97 24.82 -0.6 ±10 εr 21.0 39.9 38.0 -4.76 ±5 Head 1900 σ 21.0 1.42 1.45 2.11 ±5 1g SAR 21.0 39.7 35.84 -9.72 ±10 εr = relative permittivity, σ = conductivity and ρ=1000kg/m3 1900 MHz Head Liquid Forward Power = 21.2 dBm = 131.83 mW 1900 MHz Body Liquid Forward Power = 21.85 dBm = 153.11 mW 1900 MHz Head Liquid Forward Power = 20.3 dBm = 107.15 mW Report #R0307183S.doc Page 30 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER Report #R0307183S.doc Page 31 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER Report #R0307183S.doc Page 32 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report

High Tech Computer, Corp. FCC ID: NM8VOYAGER Report #R0307183S.doc Page 33 of 77 SAR Evaluation Report


Document Created: 2003-11-10 11:20:11
Document Modified: 2003-11-10 11:20:11
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC