SAR Report EX3DV4 1

FCC ID: NM8BG

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_579028

Schweizerischer Kalibrierdienst Schmid & Partner Service suisse d‘étalonnage Engineering AG Servizio svizzero di taratura Zeughausstrasse 43, 8004 Zurich, Switzeriand Swiss Calibration Service Accredited by the SwisFederal Office of Metrology and Accreditation Accreditation No.: SCS 108 The Swiss Accreditation Service is one of the signatories to the EA Multiateral Agreementfor the recognition of callbration certificates ciem |ecsii@ager mm uy enc pessenene CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE I Object Calioration procedure(s) QA CAL—O1.v5 Calibration procedure for dosimetric E—field probes Callbration date: Condition of the calibrated item In Tolerance_ This callbration certficate documents the traceabilty to national standards, which realize the physical units of measurements (61). The measurements and the uncertainties with confidence probabilty are given on the following pages and are part of the certficate. All calibrations have been conducted in the closed laboratory faciity: environment temperature (22 + 3)°C and humidity < 70%. Calibration Equipment used (M&TE critical for calibration) Primary Standards iD# Cal Date (Calibrated by. Cortificate No.) Scheduled Calibration Power meter E44195 cestzssere 5—May—04 (METAS, No. 251—00388) May—05 Power sensor E4412A mvaraoser? 5—May—04 (METAS, No. 251—00388) May.05 Reference 3 dB Attenuator sn: ssose (3o) 10—Aug—04 (METAS, No. 251—00403) Aug—05 Reference 20 4B Attenuator sh: ssose (20b) 3—May—04 (METAS, No. 251—00389) May.05 | Reference 30 6B Attenuator snsez cob) 10—Aug—04 (METAS, No. 251—00404) Aug—os | Reference Probe ES3DV2 snr sore 8—an—04 (SPEAG, No. ES3—3013_Jandd) Jan—s oaee sN:eir 26—May—04 (GPEAG, No. DAE4—617_MayO4) May.05 | Secondary Standards n# Check Date (in house) Scheduled Check Power sensor HP 8481A mvarosz180 18—Sep—02 (SPEAG, in house check Oc—08) In house check: Oct 05 RF generator HP 8648C US3642U01700 4—Aug—99 (GPEAG, in house check Dec—03) in house checkDec—05 Network Analyzer HP 8753E ussrsooses 18—00t01 (SPEAG, in house check Now—08) In house checkc Nov 04 Name _ Function Signature Caliorated by: Nico Vetten Laboratory Technican f Approved by: Katia Pokovic Technical Manager Issued: December 7, 2004 This calibration certficate shall not be reproduced excopt in full without written approval of the laboratory. Certiicate No: EX3—3554_NovO4 Page 1 of 10

Calibration Laboratory of Schweizerischer Kallbrierdienst Schmid & Partner Service suisse d‘étalonnage Engineering AG Servizio svizzero di taratura Zoughausstrasse 43, 8004 Zurich, Switzerland Swiss Calibration Service Accredited by the Swiss Federal Office of Metrology and Accreditation Accreditation No.: SCS 108 The Swiss Accreditation Service is one of the signatories to the EA Multilateral Agreement for the recognition of calibration cortificates Glossary: TSL tissue simulating liquid NORMx,y,z sensitivity in free space ConF sensitivity in TSL / NORMx.y,z DCP diode compression point Polarization o @ rotation around probe axis Polarization $ 8 rotation around an axis that is in the plane normal to probe axis (at measurement center), i.e., 9 = 0 is normal to probe axis Calibration is Performed According to the Following Standards: a) IEEE Std 1528—2003, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial— Averaged Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques®, December 2003 b) CENELEC EN 50361, "Basic standard for the measurementof Specific Absorption Rate related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields from mobile phones (300 MHz — 3 GHz), July 2001 Methods Applied and Interpretation of Parameters: + NORMx,.y,z: Assessed for E—field polarization 3 = 0 (f < 900 MHz in TEM—cell; f > 1800 MHz: R22 waveguide). NORMx,y,z are only intermediate values, i.e., the uncertainties of NORMx,y,z does not effect the E*—field uncertainty inside TSL (see below ConvF). NORM(Ax,y,z = NORMx,y,z * frequency_response (see Frequency Response Chart). This linearization is implemented in DASY4 software versions later than 4.2. The uncertainty of the frequency responseis included in the stated uncertainty of ConvF. DCPx,y,z: DCP are numerical linearization parameters assessed based on the data of power sweep (no uncertainty required). DCP does not depend on frequency nor media. ConvF and Boundary Effect Parameters: Assessed in flat phantom using E—field (or Temperature Transfer Standard for f < 800 MHz) and inside waveguide using analytical field distributions based on power measurements for f > 800 MHz. The same setups are used for assessment of the parameters applied for boundary compensation (alpha, depth) of which typical uncertainty values are given. These parameters are used in DASY4 software to improve probe accuracy close to the boundary. The sensitivity in TSL corresponds to NORMx.y,z * ConvF whereby the uncertainty corresponds to that given for ConvF. A frequency dependent Convis used in DASY 4.3 B17 and higher which allows extending the validity from + 50 MHz to + 100 MHz. Spherical isotropy (3D deviation from isotropy): in a field of low gradients realized using a flat phantom exposed by a patch antenna. Sensor Offset: The sensor offset corresponds to the offset of virtual measurement center from the probe tip (on probe axis). No tolerance required. Certificate No: EX3—3554_NovO4 Page 2 of 10

EX3DV4 SN:3554 November 19, 2004 Probe EX3DV4 SN:3554 Manufactured: July 13, 2004 Calibrated: November 19, 2004 Calibrated for DASY Systems (Note: non—compatible with DASY2 system!) Certificate No: EX3—3554_NovO4 Page 3 of 10

EX3DV4 SN:3554 November 19, 2004 DASY — Parameters of Probe: EX3DV4 SN:3554 Sensitivity in Free Space® Diode Compression® NormX 0.39 +9.9% uV/(V/im) DCP x 92 mV Norm¥ 0.41 £9.9% uV/(Vim) DCP Y 92 mV NormZ 0.42 + 9.9% uV/(Vim) DCP Z 92 mV Sensitivity in Tissue Simulating Liquid (Conversion Factors) Please see Page 8. Boundary Effect TSL 900 MHz Typical SAR gradient: 5 % per mm Sensor Center to Phantom Surface Distance 2.0 mm 3.0 mm SARs. (%) Without Correction Algorithm 3.7 1.1 SARse [%] With Correction Algorithm 0.2 0.4 TSL 1750 MHz Typical SAR gradient: 10 % per mm Sensor Center to Phantom Surface Distance 2.0 mm 3.0 mm SARs, %] Without Correction Algorithm 4.8 24 SARs. [%] With Correction Algorithm 0.8 0.8 Sensor Offset Probe Tip to Sensor Center 1.0 mm ‘The reported uncertainty of measurement is stated as the standard uncertainty of measurement multiplied by the coverage factor k=2, which for a normal distribution corresponds to a coverage probability of approximately 95%. * The uncertainties of NormX,Y,Z do not affect the E—feld uncertainty inside TSL (see Page 8). * Numerical inearization parameter: uncertainty not required. Certficate No: EX3—3554_NovO4 Page 4 of 10

EX3DV4 SN:3554 November 19, 2004 Frequency Response of E—Field (TEM—Cell:ifi110 EXX, Waveguide: R22) © id 118 n | € I————— | s £ A{arl~ | $ $ | $$ taret f — .| && a ¢ P i | 8 ¢§ ||1 5 | | & S a _ [ 39— dn csts k Jrpott l : 1 4y arem e 21 aB& 1| gre s1 e(O 1t e 1 ul dn ie t 2 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 f [MHz] —O—TEVNT as 7—0—R22 Uncertainty of Frequency Response of E—field: £ 6.3% (k=2) Certificate No: EX3—3554_NovO4 Page 5 of 10


Document Created: 2005-08-16 09:53:51
Document Modified: 2005-08-16 09:53:51
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC