Testing Data

FCC ID: N7NAB300A

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_88313

Intertek Testing Services ETL SEMKO Evaluation of Compliance with FCC—Specified Guidelinesfor Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on the 4 Watts ERP RF CDPD Amplifier Model:; AirBooster 350 for Sierra Wireless, Inc. Date of Test: January 31, 2000 Job # 320001446 Total No. of Pages Contained in this Report: _9 + data pages All services undertaken are subject to the following general policy: Reports are submitted for exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed. Their significance is subject to the adequacy and representative character of the sumples and to the comprehensiveness of the tests, examinations or surveys made, No quotations from reports or use of Intertek Testing Services‘ name is permitted except as expressly authorized by Intertek Testing Services in writing. FCC 2.1091 & ANSI 95.1—1992 Intertek Testing Services NA Inc. Wamock Horsay 186 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 84025 RALRE ds Telephone 660—463—2900 Fox 650—463—2010 Home Page wiwwetisemko.com I=ms: s (Mithrinrswioe ccess+55ee onltsbeiatnairninie setntTeamictses tmcc ts

Intertek Testing Services ETL SEMKO VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE No. J20001446 Verification is hereby issued to the named APPLICANT and is VALID ONLY for the equipment identified hereon for use under the rules and regulationslisted below. Equipment Under Test: 4 Watts ERP RF CDPD Amplifier Trade Name: Sierra Wireless Model No.: AirBooster 350 Serial No.: Not Labeled Applicant: Sierra Wireless, Inc. Contact: Mr. Dominique Kwong Address: 13575 Commerce Parkway, Suite 150 Richmond, BC V6V 2L1 Tel. number: (604) 231—1181 Fax number: (604) 231—1109 Applicable Regulation: FCC 2.1091 & ANSI C95.1:1992 Equipment Class: Uncontrolled Environments Date of Test: January 31, 2000 We attest to the accuracy ofthis report: 207 1 Chemomeort Xi—Ming Yang David Chemomordik Test Engineer EMC Manager Intertek Testing Services NA Inc. 1965 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 91025 c Telephone 650—463—2900 Fax 680—482—2910 Home Page wwwetisemko.com vark ioh Nibocinntats: nodleoilies >

Intertek Testing Services 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sierra Wireless, Inc., 4 Watts ERP RF CDPD Amplifier Date of Test: January 31, 2000 Table of Contents 1.0 INEPOUUCHION12. .. .220 0000000 0e ce cce er se e en e eareeererrenererer ce en n en ereeevevereerenenennen en 1 2.0 DeSCTIDtIOM Of EQUIDMENE............. .. ....ccceeeeceveeceve en n vvrrvvrveserrvnersernrernen 1 3.0 Test Summary ... 21 4.0 System Test Configuration.. «.2 4.1 Support Equipment... 2 4.2 Block Diagram of Test Setup .. 2 4.3 Justification................... 3 4.4 Software Exercise Program . 3 4.5 Mode of Operation During Test.. 3 4.6 Modifications Required for Compliance ..3 5.0 RAdited EDNISSIONS ... .........c2llccseee cce eeeee en esn en en n en vevev en en veeeneserneneernneve 4 5.1 Radiated Emission Limits ........................ .. 4 5.2 Site Description and List of Test Equipment. 5 5.3 Test Procedure............. 5 5.4 Field Strength Calculation. 5 5.5 Configuration Photographs 6 5.6 Test D&M..........ccssceee 7 6.0 Miscellaneous Information or Other CORIMeNIS ...................c.. cce cce ceeecer ces e 9 Report # 120001446 i FCC 21091 & ANSI C95.1:1992

Intertek Testing Services 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 98025 Sierra Wireless, Inc., 4 Watts ERP RF CDPD Amplifier Date of Test: January 31, 2000 1.0 Introduction This report is designed to show compliance with the FCC Part 2.1091 Radio Frequency Radiation Exposure Evaluation for mobile and unlicensed devices. The test procedures and limits, as described in American National Standards Institute C95.1—1992, were employed. A description of the product and operating configuration, the various provisions of the rules, the methods for determining compliance, and a detailed summary ofthe results are included within thistest report. 2.0 Description of Equipment The Sietra Wireless, Inc. Model AirBooster is a 4 watts ERP RF CDPD amplifier with frequency range from 824 — 849 MHz. The amplifier is used with the following antennas: Antenna number 1. Larsen M/N: NMO 800+BAS—03, 3.0 dBd gain. Antenna number 2. Antenna World M/N: MST—855+BAS—08, 3.0 dBd gain. Antenna number 3. Aligon M/N: PM—BF42, 3.0 dBd gain. Antenna number 4. Antenna World M/N: CLR—877. Antenna number 5. Antenna World M/N: CLR—8247+BAS—04 3.0 Test Summary The CDPD Amplifier was tested by Intertek Testing Services as documented herein, and the energy emitted by the EUT was found to be below the recommended levels of Maximum Permissible Exposure for Uncontrolled Environments in FCC 1.1310 (ANSI C95.1: 1992). Therefore, in reference to the limits set forth in FCC 1,1310 use of the equipment is deemed to be safe with respect to human exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, when used in a normal fashion. Report # 120001446 1 FCC 2.1091 & ANSI C95.1:1992

Intertck Testing Services 1365 Adams Court, Mento Park, CA 94025 Sicrra Wireless, Inc., 4 Watts ERP RF CDPD Amplifier Date of Test: January 31, 2000 4.0 System Test Configuration 4.1 Support Equipment _Feed 1 IBM Computer 2600—50UASOODVC MLZ315 2 GW DC Power Supply GPR—6030 N/A N/A 3 Sierra Modem $B300 206—00065973 NTNOEM2 4 Sierra Interface Test Band MIE N/A N/A 5 AC Adaptor NDIE1000LO0 N/A N/A 4.2 Block Diagram of Test Setup Antenna in 1.5m, 8 is 0.im,U 0 EUT 3 f, 8 P @) P > 9 Pin Serial RG178 Coax Cable (13 m) Sm, U Power Cable (Blue) ® @ \\g\\‘WZ/fl%///// L M0 Report # 120001446 2 FCC 2.1091 & ANSI C95.1:1992 bo db son. moabhowliet s

c Intertek Testing Services 1365 Adams Court, Mento Park, CA 94025 B Sietra Wireless, Inc., 4 Watts ERP RF CDPD Amplifier Date of Test: January 31, 2000 4.3 Justification c The system was configured for testing in a typical fashion (as a customer would normally use it). 5t 4.4 Software Exercise Program t No special software was used during the tests. O 4.5 Mode of Operation During Test c Transmitting full power (4W). 4.6 Modifications Required for Compliance O The following modifications were installed during compliance testing in order to bring the product into compliance (Please note that this list does not include changes made specifically by Teledex O Corporation prior to compliance testing): No modifications were installed by Intertek Testing Services. o c c c c t m c 1 Report # 320001446 3 FCC 2.1091 & ANSI C95.1:1992 C bflmgmmfiWMMmmMa «uoieebnnciieWhmcescne dertt o. o lce utedb two1 17B

EZ Intertek Testing Services 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 98025 CE3 Sierra Wireless, Inc., 4 Watts ERP RF CDPD Amplifier Date of Test: January 31, 2000 5.0 Radiated Emissions E3 5.1 Radiated Emission Limits, FCC 1.1310 s The following exposure limits apply to equipment use in Uncontrolled Environments: E3 Maximum Permissible Exposure for Uncontrolled Environments LE3 Frequency Electric Field Magnetic Field Power Density (8) Averaging Time Range Strength (E) Strength (B) E—field, H—field (Minutes) (MHZ) (Vim) (&/m) (mW/cor) 2 0.3 — 1.34 614 1.63 *100 30 1.34 — 30 824/f 2.19/f *180/7 30 + 30 — 300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 —f 300 — 1500 — — £/1500 30 1500 — 100,000 — — 1.0 30 —H * = Plane—wave equivalent power density. Dashes *—" are used to indicate that there is no limit under the guideline. n o— EB t3 s oS3 tS3 Report # 120001446 4 FCC 2.1091 & ANSI C95.1:1992 CQ

E_ Intertek Testing Services 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 BD Sierra Wireless, Inc., 4 Watts ERP RF CDPD Amplifier Date of Test: January 31, 2000 5.2 Site Description and List of Test Equipment. &3 All tests were performed on Open Area Test Site. Em Measurement equipment used for radiated emission compliance testing utilized some of the equipment on the following list: m S Holaday Field Strougth Meter HI—3004EX 5/7/00 5.3 Test Procedure The test was performed at 836 MHz. ‘The antenna was placed on a 0.8m wooden table on open site. The antenna was connected to the EUT. EUT output power was measured at RF output I connector, EUT has 36.5 dBm power output. The sensor of the field strength meter was moved around the antenna to obtain the maximum reading of the field strength meter. The measurements were performed at the distance 0.2m and 0.3m from the antenna. C—I 5.4 Field Strength Calculation ——] The field strength was measured directly from the meter. ‘The power density (PD in W.m‘) was calculated using the following formula: —M Pd = E‘/120x — Where E is Field Strength in V/m Report # 120001446 5 FCC 2.1091 & ANSI C95.1:1992 ED omm ns . e on mead0000000000ms ttinin Tiiiirmninbiaiciteercivaiscouriemvressstt xcoada/a SsnoocmimRINTT

Intertek Testing Services 1369 adans Court Mento Prk, ca 94028 Sierra Wireless, Inc. 4 WatteERP RF CDPD Amplifer Date of Test: January 31, 2000 5.5 Configuration Photographs Radiated Emission Anterna 1 Antenna 2 Report 420001446 6 roo 2 1001& Anst Cos 11000

Intertek Testing Services 1365 Adams Court, Mento Pork, CA 94025 E Sietra Wireless, Inc., 4 Watts ERP RF CDPD Amplifier Date of Test: January 31, 2000 5.6 Test Data The results on the following page(s) were obtained when the device was tested in the condition described in section 4. —] —lM s Es s t m n 0.1 60 0.95 0.54 0.2 32 0.27 0.54 0.3 25 0.17 0.54 t 0.5 17 0.07 0.54 fl 1.0 9 0.021 0.54 1.5 7.5 0.015 0.54 U Report # 120001446 7 FCC 2.1091 & ANSI C95.1:1992 mmnmnummfimmmmmmmmi,;;;‘.;m‘ (ndovitl ntinttiatbstink h se

Intertek Testing Services 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sierra Wireless, Inc., 4 Watts ERP RF CDPD Amplifier Date of Test: January 31, 2000 es3 n 0.1 _ & ' 102 | 0.54 > 0.2 33 0.29 0.54 0.3 27 0.19 0.54 0.5 21 0.12 0.54 1.0 10 0.027 0.54 E23 0.017 0.54 — in se o t fi . . iWiens 6 0.95 0.54 3 027 0.5 29 0.22 0.5 . 70 om 0.54 1.0 12 0.038 0.54 Ed 0.017 0.54 in — se o Judgment: The EUT will pass ECC limit at a distance 0.2m or longer from EUT. Ex3 oo &9 o 5 i 5 s Report # 320001446 8 FCC 2.1091 & ANSI C95.1:1992 C3 hmw&«w-mmnmflmt Funvhinaiast tbesiiatines isbbee

ES Intertek Testing Services 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 CS Sietra Wireless, Inc., 4 Watts ERP RF CDPD Amplifier Date of Test: January 31, 2000 6.0 Miscellaneous Information or Other Comments €0 None. E3 2 ~=] — —f — — —f —A o ED 2 3 C o Report # 120001446 9 FCC 2.1091 & ANSI C95.1:1992 C hcinedrndumeltssfeatieeeatatatoasswhnsstli Te dentlte 20.e + ondsb n t h ltic .


Document Created: 2000-02-21 09:45:00
Document Modified: 2000-02-21 09:45:00
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC