test report

FCC ID: MAU1011

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_328601

Report No. 034H046F Test Report Product Name: Rugged Wireless Keyboard Model No.: RKB FCC ID. : MAU1011 Applicant : MITAC THCHNOLOGY CORP. Address : No. 1, R&D Road 2, Hsinchu Science-Based Industrial Park, Taiwan, R.O.C. Date of Receipt : Apr. 14, 2003 Date of Test : May 6, 2003 Report No. : 034H046F The test results relate only to the samples tested. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of QuieTek Corporation. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP any agency of the U.S. Government Page : 1 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F Test Re port Certification Test Date : May 6, 2003 Report No. : 034H046F Accredited by NIST (NVLAP) NVLAP Lab Code: 200347-0 Product Name : Rugged Wireless Keyboard Applicant : MITAC THCHNOLOGY CORP. Address : No. 1, R&D Road 2, Hsinchu Science-Based Industrial Park, Taiwan, R.O.C. Manufacturer : MITAC THCHNOLOGY CORP. Model No. : RKB FCC ID. : MAU1011 Rated Voltage : AC 120V/60Hz Trade Name : MITAC Measurement Standard : FCC Part 15 Subpart B: 2002, CISPR 22: 1997 Measurement Procedure : ANSI C63.4: 1992 Classification : Class B Test Result : Complied The Test Results relate only to the samples tested. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of QuieTek Corporation. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP any agency of the U.S. Government Documented By : ( Ellie Cheng ) Tested By : ( James Wu ) Approved By : ( Kevin Wang ) Page : 2 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S Description Page 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ....................................................................................................4 1.1. EUT Description...........................................................................................................................4 1.2. Tested System Details...................................................................................................................5 1.3. Configuration of tested System ....................................................................................................6 1.4. EUT Exercise Software ................................................................................................................6 1.5. Test Facility ..................................................................................................................................7 2. Conducted Emission...................................................................................................................8 2.1. Test Equipment.............................................................................................................................8 2.2. Test Setup .....................................................................................................................................8 2.3. Limits ...........................................................................................................................................9 2.4. Test Procedure ..............................................................................................................................9 2.5. Test Result ....................................................................................................................................9 3. Radiated Emission....................................................................................................................10 3.1. Test Equipment...........................................................................................................................10 3.2. Test Setup ...................................................................................................................................10 3.3. Limits .........................................................................................................................................11 3.4. Test Procedure ............................................................................................................................12 3.5. Test Result ..................................................................................................................................12 4. EMI Reduction Method During Compliance Testing ...........................................................13 5. Summary of Test Datas ............................................................................................................14 5.1. Test Data of conducted Emission ...............................................................................................15 5.2 Test Data of Radiated Emission...............................................................................................................17 Attachment 1: EUT Test Photographs Attachment 2: EUT Detailed Photographs Page : 3 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. EUT Description Product Name : Rugged Wireless Keyboard Trade Name : MITAC Model No. : RKB Power Adapter : FAIRWAY, VE20-120 Cable Out: Non-Shielded, 1.8m Power cord: Non-Shielded, 1.8m Note: 1. This EUT is a Rugged Wireless Keyboard. 2. QuieTek has verified both construction and function in typical operation. All the test modes were carried out with the EUT in normal operation, which was shown in this test report and defined as: EMI Mode: Mode 1: Normal Operation Page : 4 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F 1.2. Tested System Details The types for all equipment, plus descriptions of all cables used in the tested system (including inserted cards) are: Product Manufacturer Model No. Serial No. Power Cord Non-shielded, 1.8m, (1) PC MITAC CA25 N/A a ferrite core bonded (2) USB Mouse Logitech M-BE58 LZE11405011 -- (3) CD-ROM MITAC N/A N/A -- (4) USB Mouse Logitech M-BE58 LZE11403949 -- Microphone & (5) TOKTO SX-MI N/A -- Earphone (6) Modem ACEEX DM-1414 960011397 Non-shielded, 1.6m Signal Cable Type Signal cable Description A. Microphone & Earphone Cable Non-Shielded, 1.2m B Modem Cable Shielded, 1.5m C USB Mouse Cable Shielded, 1.0m D CD-ROM Cable Shielded, 0.2m, a ferrite core bonded E USB Mouse Cable Shielded, 1.0m Page : 5 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F 1.3. Configuration of tested System PC C (1) A USB Mouse D (2) Microphone E & Earphone (5) CD ROM (3) B Modem USB Mouse (6) EUT (4) 1.4. EUT Exercise Software 1.4.1 Setup the EUT and simulators as shown on 1.3. 1.4.2 Turn on the power of all equipment. 1.4.3 Boot the PC from Hard Disk. 1.4.4 The PC will check data through PC to EUT. 1.4.5 The personal computer's monitor will show the transmitting and receiving characteristics when the communication is success. 1.4.6 Repeat the above procedure 1.4.4 to 1.4.5 Page : 6 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F 1.5. Test Facility Ambient conditions in the laboratory: Items Required (IEC 68-1) Actual Temperature (°C) 15-35 20-35 Humidity (%RH) 25-75 50-65 Barometric pressure (mbar) 860-1060 950-1000 Site Description: November 3, 1998 File on Federal Communications Commission FCC Engineering Laboratory 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 Reference 31040/SIT1300F2 August 30, 2001 Accreditation on NVLAP NVLAP Lab Code: 200347-0 Site Name: Quietek Corporation Site Address: No.75-1, Wang-Yeh Valley, Yung-Hsing, Chiung-Lin, Hsin-Chu County, Taiwan, R.O.C. TEL: 886-3-592-8858 / FAX: 886-3-592-8859 E-Mail: service@quietek.com Page : 7 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F 2. Conducted Emission 2.1. Test Equipment The following test equipment are used during the conducted emission test: Item Instrument Manufacturer Type No./Serial No Last Cal.. Remark 1 Test Receiver R&S ESCS 30/825442/17 May, 2002 2 L.I.S.N. R&S ESH3-Z5/825016/6 May, 2002 EUT 3 L.I.S.N. Kyoritsu KNW-407/8-1420-3 May, 2002 Peripherals 4 Pulse Limiter R&S ESH3-Z2 N/A 5 No.2 Shielded Room N/A Note: All equipment upon which need to calibrated are with calibration period of 1 year. 2.2. Test Setup Reference Plane Test Receiver 40cm 12dBuV EUT ††† Load ††† LISN LISN LISN Ground Plane Page : 8 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F 2.3. Limits FCC Part 15 Subpart B Limits (dBuV) Frequency Class A Class B MHz QP AV QP AV 0.15 - 0.50 79 66 66-56 56-46 0.50-5.0 73 60 56 46 5.0 - 30 73 60 60 50 Remarks : In the above table, the tighter limit applies at the band edges. 2.4. Test Procedure The EUT and simulators are connected to the main power through a line impedance stabilization network (L.I.S.N.). This provides a 50 ohm /50uH coupling impedance for the measuring equipment. The peripheral devices are also connected to the main power through a LISN that provides a 50ohm/50uH coupling impedance with 50ohm termination. (Please refers to the block diagram of the test setup and photographs.) Both sides of A.C. line are checked for maximum conducted interference. In order to find the maximum emission, the relative positions of equipment and the entire interface cables must be changed according to ANSI C63.4: 1992 on conducted measurement. Conducted emissions were invested over the frequency range from 0.15MHz to 30MHz using a receiver bandwidth of 9kHz. 2.5. Test Result The emission from the EUT was below the specified limits. The worst-case emissions are shown in section 5. The acceptance criterion was met and the EUT passed the test. Page : 9 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F 3. Radiated Emission 3.1. Test Equipment The following test equipment are used during the radiated emission test: Test Site Equipment Manufacturer Model No./Serial No. Last Cal. Site # 1 Test Receiver R&S ESCS 30 / 825442/14 May, 2002 Spectrum Analyzer Advantest R3261C / 71720140 May, 2002 Pre-Amplifier HP 8447D/3307A01812 May, 2002 Bilog Antenna Chase CBL6112B / 12452 Sep., 2002 Horn Antenna EM EM6917 / 103325 May, 2002 Site # 2 X Test Receiver R&S ESCS 30 / 825442/17 May, 2002 X Spectrum Analyzer Advantest R3261C / 71720609 May, 2002 X Pre-Amplifier HP 8447D/3307A01814 May, 2002 X Bilog Antenna Chase CBL6112B / 2455 Sep., 2002 Horn Antenna EM EM6917 / 103325 May, 2002 Note: 1. All equipments that need to calibrate are with calibration period of 1 year. 2. Mark “X” test instruments are used to measure the final test results. 3.2. Test Setup 10m FRP Dome 1m to 4m Antenna Mast Broadband or Dipole Antenna Antenna height can be moved from 1m to 4m. Non-Conducted Table EUT 80cm Fully Metal Mesh Ground Plane To Controller Test To Receiver Receiver Page : 10 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F 3.3. Limits CISPR 22 Limits (dBuV/m) Frequency Class B MHz Distance dBuV/m (m) 30 – 230 10 30 230 – 1000 10 37 Remark: 1. The tighter limit shall apply at the edge between two frequency bands. 2. Distance refers to the distance in meters between the measuring instrument antenna and the closed point of any part of the device or system. 3. RF Voltage (dBuV/m) = 20 log RF Voltage (uV/m) Page : 11 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F 3.4. Test Procedure The EUT and its simulators are placed on a turn table which is 0.8 meter above ground. The turn table can rotate 360 degrees to determine the position of the maximum emission level. The EUT was positioned such that the distance from antenna to the EUT was 10 meters. The antenna can move up and down between 1 meter and 4 meters to find out the maximum emission level. Both horizontal and vertical polarization of the antenna are set on measurement. In order to find the maximum emission, all of the interface cables must be manipulated according to ANSI C63.4:1992 on radiated measurement. Radiated emissions were invested over the frequency range from 30MHz to1GHz using a receiver bandwidth of 120kHz. Radiated was performed at an antenna to EUT distance of 10 meters. 3.5. Test Result The emission from the EUT was below the specified limits. The worst-case emissions are shown in section 5. The acceptance criterion was met and the EUT passed the test. Page : 12 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F 4. EMI Reduction Method During Compliance Testing No modification was made during testing. Page : 13 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F 5. Summary of Test Datas The test results in the emission was performed according to the requirements of measurement standard and process. Quietek Corporation is assumed full responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these measurements. The test data of the emission is listed as below. All the tests were carried out with the EUT in normal operation, which was defined as: EMI Mode: Mode 1: Normal Operation Page : 14 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F 5.1. Test Data of conducted Emission Product : Rugged Wireless Keyboard Test Item : Conducted Emission Test Power Line : Line 1 Test Mode : Mode 1: Normal Operation Frequency Cable LISN Reading Emission Limits Loss Factor Level Level MHz dB dB dBuV dBuV dBuV ======================================================================== Quasi-Peak 0.155 -0.01 0.10 44.45 44.54 65.71 0.312 0.00 0.17 45.19 45.36 59.91 *0.626 0.03 0.24 46.21 46.47 56.00 0.786 0.02 0.26 43.94 44.22 56.00 1.097 0.03 0.29 44.44 44.76 56.00 1.716 0.09 0.33 41.89 42.31 56.00 Average: 0.155 -0.01 0.10 43.60 43.69 55.73 0.312 0.00 0.17 44.10 44.27 49.92 0.626 0.03 0.24 42.10 42.36 46.00 0.786 0.02 0.26 40.40 40.68 46.00 1.097 0.03 0.29 38.10 38.42 46.00 1.716 0.09 0.33 32.60 33.02 46.00 Note: 1. All Reading Levels are Quasi-Peak and average value. 2. “ * ”, means this data is the worst emission level. 3. Emission Level = Reading Level + LISN Factor + Cable loss. Page : 15 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F Product : Rugged Wireless Keyboard Test Item : Conducted Emission Test Power Line : Line 2 Test Mode : Mode 1: Normal Operation Frequency Cable LISN Reading Emission Limits Loss Factor Level Level MHz dB dB dBuV dBuV dBuV ======================================================================== Quasi-Peak 0.158 -0.01 0.10 45.45 45.54 65.58 0.314 0.00 0.17 45.25 45.42 59.86 *0.623 0.03 0.24 46.29 46.55 56.00 0.783 0.02 0.26 44.77 45.05 56.00 1.091 0.03 0.29 45.08 45.40 56.00 1.717 0.09 0.33 42.15 42.57 56.00 Average: 0.158 -0.01 0.10 43.90 43.99 55.57 0.314 0.00 0.17 44.10 44.27 49.86 0.623 0.03 0.24 40.00 40.26 46.00 0.783 0.02 0.26 40.50 40.78 46.00 1.091 0.03 0.29 38.00 38.32 46.00 1.717 0.09 0.33 33.00 33.42 46.00 Note: 1. All Reading Levels are Quasi-Peak and average value. 2. “ * ”, means this data is the worst emission level. 3. Emission Level = Reading Level + LISN Factor + Cable loss. Page : 16 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F 5.2 Test Data of Radiated Emission Product : Rugged Wireless Keyboard Test Item : Radiated Emission Test Site : No.2 OATS Test Mode : Mode 1: Normal Operation Freq. Cable Probe PreAMP Reading Emission Margin Limit Loss Factor Level Level MHz dB dB/m dB dBuV dBuV/m dB dBuV/m ========================================================== Horizontal *45.060 1.30 10.66 0.00 11.07 23.03 6.97 30.00 145.250 2.26 11.26 0.00 4.87 18.39 11.61 30.00 169.235 2.49 9.56 0.00 3.29 15.34 14.66 30.00 240.000 3.17 11.32 0.00 3.69 18.18 18.82 37.00 432.000 4.44 16.31 0.00 1.02 21.77 15.23 37.00 532.000 4.96 18.11 0.00 2.37 25.43 11.57 37.00 912.225 6.95 21.05 0.00 1.49 29.49 7.51 37.00 Vertical 55.245 1.39 6.80 0.00 9.47 17.66 12.34 30.00 64.265 1.48 6.58 0.00 10.54 18.60 11.40 30.00 139.525 2.21 11.15 0.00 7.69 21.04 8.96 30.00 167.135 2.47 9.67 0.00 3.20 15.34 14.66 30.00 233.525 3.11 10.51 0.00 2.21 15.83 21.17 37.00 300.350 3.76 13.56 0.00 -0.27 17.04 19.96 37.00 535.000 4.98 18.11 0.00 2.27 25.36 11.64 37.00 627.650 5.46 18.50 0.00 0.76 24.72 12.28 37.00 *746.725 6.09 19.23 0.00 7.11 32.43 4.57 37.00 Note: 1. All Readings below 1GHz are Quasi-Peak, above are performed with peak and/or average measurements as necessary. 2. “ * ”, means this data is the worst emission level. 3. Emission Level = Reading Level + LISN Factor + Cable loss-PreAMP. Page : 17 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F Attachment 1: EUT Test Photographs Page : 18 of 19 Version:1.0

Report No. 034H046F Attachment 2: EUT Detailed Photographs Page : 19 of 19 Version:1.0


Document Created: 2003-05-20 16:08:10
Document Modified: 2003-05-20 16:08:10
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC