Probe

FCC ID: MAU039

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_1346612

Calibration Laboratory of Schweizerischer Kalibrierdienst Schmid & Partner Service suisse d‘étalonnage Engineering AG Servizio svizzero di taratura Zeughausstrasse 43, 8004 Zurich, Switzerland Swiss Calibration Service Accredited by the Swiss Accreditation Service (SAS) Accreditation No.: SCS 108 The Swiss Accreditation Service is one of the signatories to the EA Multilateral Agreement for the recognition of calibration certificates Client CCS (Auden) Certificate No: EX3—3554_Sep09 CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE Object EX3DV4 — SN:3554 Calibration procedure(s) QA CAL—01.v6, QA CAL—14.v3, QA CAL—23.v3and QA CAL—25.v2 Calibrétionproce@ure for dosimetric E—field probes Calibration date September 22, 2009 Condition of the calibrated item In Tolerance This calibration certificate documents the traceability to national standards, which realize the physical units of measurements (S1) The measurements and the uncertainties with confidence probability are given on the following pages and are part of the certificate. All calibrations have been conducted in the closed laboratory facility: environment temperature (22 + 3)°C and humidity < 70%. Calibration Equipment used (M&TE critical for calibration) Primary Standards ID#_ Cal Date (Certificate No.) _ _______ ScheduledCalibration _ Power meter E44198 GB41293874 1—Apr—09 (No. 217—01030) Apr—10 Power sensor E4412A MY41495277 1—Apr—09 (No. 217—01030) Apr—10 Power sensor E4412A MY41498087 1—Apr—09 (No. 217—01030) Apr—10 Reference 3 dB Attenuator SN: $5054 (30) 31—Mar—09 (No. 217—01026) Mar—10 Reference 20 dB Attenuator SN: $5086 (20b) 31—Mar—09 (No. 217—01028) Mar—10 Reference 30 dB Attenuator SN: S5129 (30b) 31—Mar—09 (No. 217—01027) Mar—10 Reference Probe ES3DV2 SN: 3013 2—Jan—09 (No. ES3—3013_Jan09) Jan—10 DAE4 SN: 660 9—Sep—08 (No. DAE4—660_Sep08) Sep—09 Secondary Standards ID # Check Date (in house) Scheduled Check RF generator HP 8648C US3642U01700 4—Aug—99 (in house check Oct—07) in house check: Oct—09 Network Analyzer HP 8753E US37390585 18—Oct—01 (in house check Oct—08) in house check: Oct—09 Name Function Slgnalure Calibrated by: Katja Pokovic Technical Manager & 7 Approved by: Niels Kuster Quality Manager Issued: September 24, 2009 This calibration certificate shall not be reproduced except in full without written approval of the laboratory Certificate No: EX3—3554_SepO9 Page 1 of 9

Calibration Laboratory of Schweizerischer Kalibrierdienst Schmid & Partner Service suisse d‘étalonnage Engineering AG Servizio svizzero di taratura Zeughausstrasse 43, 8004 Zurich, Switzerland Swiss Calibration Service Accredited by the Swiss Accreditation Service (SAS) Accreditation No.: SCS 108 The Swiss Accreditation Service is one of the signatories to the EA Multilateral Agreement for the recognition of calibration certificates Glossary: TSL tissue simulating liquid NORMx,y,z sensitivity in free space ConvF sensitivity in TSL / NORMx,y,z DCP diode compression point Polarization rotation around probe axis Polarization 9 9 rotation around an axis that is in the plane normal to probe axis (at measurement center), i.e., 8 = 0 is normal to probe axis Calibration is Performed According to the Following Standards: a) IEEE Std 1528—2003, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial— Averaged Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques", December 2003 b) IEC 62209—1, "Procedure to measure the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for hand—held devices used in close proximity to the ear (frequency range of 300 MHz to 3 GHz)", February 2005 Methods Applied and Interpretation of Parameters: e NORMx,y,z: Assessed for E—field polarization 9 = 0 (f < 900 MHz in TEM—cell; f > 1800 MHz: R22 waveguide). NORMx,y,z are only intermediate values, i.e., the uncertainties of NORMx,y,z does not effect the E®—field uncertainty inside TSL (see below ConvF). e NORM(Mx,y,z = NORMx,y,z * frequency_response (see Frequency Response Chart). This linearization is implemented in DASY4 software versions later than 4.2. The uncertainty of the frequency response is included in the stated uncertainty of ConvF. e DCPx,y,z: DCP are numerical linearization parameters assessed based on the data of power sweep (no uncertainty required). DCP does not depend on frequency nor media. * ConvF and Boundary Effect Parameters: Assessed in flat phantom using E—field (or Temperature Transfer Standard for f < 800 MHz) and inside waveguide using analytical field distributions based on power measurements for f > 800 MHz. The same setups are used for assessment of the parameters applied for boundary compensation (alpha, depth) of which typical uncertainty values are given. These parameters are used in DASY4 software to improve probe accuracy close to the boundary. The sensitivity in TSL corresponds to NORMx,y,z * ConvF whereby the uncertainty corresponds to that given for ConvF. A frequency dependent ConvF is used in DASY version 4.4 and higher which allows extending the validity from + 50 MHz to + 100 MHz. e Spherical isotropy (3D deviation from isotropy): in a field of low gradients realized using a flat phantom exposed by a patch antenna. * Sensor Offset: The sensor offset corresponds to the offset of virtual measurement center from the probe tip (on probe axis). No tolerance required. Certificate No: EX3—3554_SepO9 Page 2 of 9

EX3DV4 SN:3554 September 22, 2009 Probe EX3DV4 SN:3554 Manufactured: July 13, 2004 Last calibrated: September 18, 2008 Recalibrated: September 22, 2009 Calibrated for DASY Systems (Note: non—compatible with DASY2 system!) Certificate No: EX3—3554_Sep09 Page 3 of 9

EX3DV4 SN:3554 September 22, 2009 DASY — Parameters of Probe: EX3DV4 SN:3554 Sensitivity in Free Space*® Diode Compression® NormX 0.38 £10.1% uV/(V/m)" DCP xX 91 mV NormY 0.46 £10.1% uV/(V/im) DCP Y 89 mV NormZ 0.41 £10.1% uV/(V/im) DCP Z 91 mV Sensitivity in Tissue Simulating Liquid (Conversion Factors) Please see Page 8. Boundary Effect TSL 900 MHz Typical SAR gradient: 5 % per mm Sensor Center to Phantom Surface Distance 2.0 mm 3.0 mm SARp. (%] Without Correction Algorithm 10.9 6.0 SARp, (%] With Correction Algorithm 0.8 0.5 TSL 1750 MHz Typical SAR gradient: 10 % per mm Sensor Center to Phantom Surface Distance 2.0 mm 3.0 mm SARpe [%] Without Correction Algorithm 7.4 3.9 SARpe (%] With Correction Algorithm 0.8 0.5 Sensor Offset Probe Tip to Sensor Center 1.0 mm The reported uncertainty of measurement is stated as the standard uncertainty of measurement multiplied by the coverage factor k=2, which for a normal distribution corresponds to a coverage probability of approximately 95%. * The uncertainties of NormX,Y,Z do not affect the E"—field uncertainty inside TSL (see Page 8). 5 Numerical linearization parameter: uncertainty not required Certificate No: EX3—3554_Sep09 Page 4 of 9

EX3DV4 SN:3554 September 22, 2009 Frequency Response of E—Field Frequency response (normalized) (TEM—Cell:ifi110 EXX, Waveguide: R22) 0.5 ! ‘ } | | o 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 f [MHz] —o—TEM —o—R22 | Uncertainty of Frequency Response of E—field: + 6.3% (k=2) Certificate No: EX3—3554_Sep09 Page 5 of 9

EX3DV4 SN:3554 September 22, 2009 Receiving Pattern (¢), 9 = 0° f = 600 MHz, TEM ifi110EXX f= 1800 MHz, WG R22 ‘ —0—30 MHz | — —®— 100 MHz B —6—600 MHz 5 —&— 1800 MHz | i |—&—2500 MHz | | 0 60 120 180 240 300 || 6 F] Uncertainty of Axial Isotropy Assessment: + 0.5% (k=2) Certificate No: EX3—3554_SepO9 Page 6 of 9

EX3DV4 SN:3554 September 22, 2009 Dynamic Range f(SARpeaq) (Waveguide R22, f = 1800 MHz) 1.E+06 1.E+05 1.E+04 Input Signal [uV] 1.E+03 1.E+02 1,E+01 1.E+00 : 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 SAR [mW/cm‘] —@—not compensated —®— compensated 0 ; o I o6 | [ @ I\ o2 | Error [dB] 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 SAR [mW/cm‘] Uncertainty of Linearity Assessment: £ 0.6% (k=2) Certificate No: EX3—3554_SepO9 Page 7 of 9

EX3DV4 SN:3554 September 22, 2009 Conversion Factor Assessment f [MHz] Validity [MHz]® TSL Permittivity Conductivity Alpha Depth ConvF Uncertainty 835 + 50 / £ 100 Head 41.5£5% 0.90 £+5% 0.79 0.64 7.39 £11.0% (k=2) 900 + 50 / £ 100 Head 41.5£5% 0.97 + 5% 0.71 0.67 7.20 £11.0% (k=2) 1750 £50 /+ 100 Head 40.1£5% 1.37 + 5% 0.57 0.65 6.49 £11.0% (k=2) 1900 £50/+ 100 Head 40.0£5% 1.40 + 5% 0.54 0.70 6.27 £11.0% (k=2) 2000 £50/+ 100 Head 40.0£5% 1.40 + 5% 0.61 0.65 6.16 £11.0% (k=2) 2450 £50/£100 Head 39.2 + 5% 1.80 + 5% 0.33 0.87 5.74 £11.0%(k=2) 4950 £50/£ 100 Head 36.3 £5% 4.40 + 5% 0.35 1.90 4.71 #13.1% (k=2) 5200 £50/£ 100 Head 36.0 £5% 4.66 + 5% 0.35 1.90 4.63 +13.1% (k=2) 5300 £50/£100 Head 35.9£5% 4.76 £ 5% 0.40 1.90 4.35 £13.1% (k=2) 5500 £50 /+ 100 Head 35.6 +5% 4.96 +5% 0.45 1.90 4.21 +13.1% (k=2) 5600 £50/+100 Head 35.5 +5% 5.07 +5% 0.45 1.90 4.09 +13.1% (k=2) 5800 £50/+100 Head 35.3 + 5% 5.27 + 5% 0.50 1.90 4.05 +13.1% (k=2) 835 £ 50 / £ 100 Body 55.2%5% 0.97 + 5% 0.73 0.67 7.28 £11.0% (k=2) 900 + 50 / £ 100 Body 55.0%5% 1.05 £5% 0.74 0.67 7.14 £11.0% (k=2) 1750 £50 /+ 100 Body 53.4%5% 1.49£5% 0.63 0.65 6.20 £11.0% (k=2) 1900 £50 /+ 100 Body 53.3%5% 1.52+5% 0.59 0.70 5.97 £11.0% (k=2) 2000 £50/£ 100 Body 53.3%5% 1.52%5% 0.41 0.80 6.09 £11.0% (k=2) 2450 £50/+100 Body 52.7 %5% 1.95 + 5% 0.28 1.07 5.80 £11.0% (k=2) 4950 £+50/+100 Body 49.4 £5% 5.01 + 5% 0.50 1.95 3.83 £13.1% (k=2) 5200 £50/£ 100 Body 49.0£5% 5.30 + 5% 0.53 1.95 3.80 £13.1% (k=2) 5300 £50 /+ 100 Body 48.5£5% 5.42 +5% 0.56 1.95 3.57 £13.1% (k=2) 5500 £50/£100 Body 48.6£5% 5.65 + 5% 0.57 1.95 3.37 £13.1% (k=2) 5600 £50/+100 Body 48.5£5% 5.77 + 5% 0.53 1.95 3.30 #13.1% (k=2) 5800 £50/+100 Body 48.2£5% 6.00 + 5% 0.63 1.95 3.31 £13.1% (k=2) © The validity of £ 100 MHz only applies for DASY v4.4 and higher (see Page 2). The uncertainty is the RSS of the ConvF uncertainty at calibration frequency and the uncertainty for the indicated frequency band. Certificate No: EX3—3554_Sep09 Page 8 of 9

EX3DV4 SN:3554 September 22, 2009 Deviation from Isotropy in HSL Error (¢, 39), f = 900 MHz Error [dB] 10 s s n s s ©—1.00——0.80 ©—0.80——0.60 ©—0.60——0.40 M—0.40——0.20 4—0.20—0.00 ©0.00—0.20 ©0.20—0.40 ©0.40—0.60 ©0.60—0.80 ©10.80—1.00 Uncertainty of Spherical Isotropy Assessment: + 2.6% (k=2) Certificate No: EX3—3554_SepO9 Page 9 of 9


Document Created: 2009-10-12 11:16:31
Document Modified: 2009-10-12 11:16:31
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC