Test Report

FCC ID: KL7-600SP-V1

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_229182

Electromagnetic Emissions Test Report and Application for Grant of Equipment Authorization pursuant to FCC Part 15, Subpart C Specifications for an Intentional Radiator on the Savi Technology, Inc. Model: EchoPoint Signpost, Model SP-600-101 FCC ID: KL7 - 600SP- V1 GRANTEE: Savi Technology, Inc. 615 Tasman Drive Sunnyvale, CA. 94089-1707 TEST SITE: Elliott Laboratories, Inc. 684 W. Maude Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94086 REPORT DATE: February 8, 2002 FINAL TEST DATE: January 18 and February 5, 2002 AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY: ______________________________ Mark Briggs Director of Engineering This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Elliott Laboratories, Inc. File: R46200 Page 1 of 12

Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: February 8, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE...................................................................................................................................................................................1 TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 SCOPE............................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 OBJECTIVE................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE.............................................................................................................................................. 3 EMISSION TEST RESULTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED INTERFERENCE VOLTAGE.....................................................................................................4 LIMITS OF RADIATED INTERFERENCE FIELD STRENGTH..........................................................................................4 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES ....................................................................................................................................4 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DETAILS.......................................................................................................................... 5 GENERAL...................................................................................................................................................................................5 ENCLOSURE ..............................................................................................................................................................................5 MODIFICATIONS.....................................................................................................................................................................5 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT...........................................................................................................................................................5 EUT INTERFACE PORTS ........................................................................................................................................................5 EUT OPERATION .....................................................................................................................................................................5 TEST SITE...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 GENERAL INFORMATION.....................................................................................................................................................6 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS.................................................................................................................6 RADIATED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS ....................................................................................................................6 MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION.................................................................................................................................. 7 RECEIVER SYSTEM..................................................................................................................................................................7 INSTRUMENT CONTROL COMPUTER...............................................................................................................................7 LINE IMPEDANCE STABILIZATION NETWORK (LISN)................................................................................................7 FILTERS/ATTENUATORS......................................................................................................................................................7 ANTENNAS...............................................................................................................................................................................8 ANTENNA MAST AND EQUIPMENT TURNTABLE.......................................................................................................8 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION..............................................................................................................................................8 TEST PROCEDURES ................................................................................................................................................................... 9 EUT AND CABLE PLACEMENT ...........................................................................................................................................9 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS......................................................................................................................................................9 RADIATED EMISSIONS .........................................................................................................................................................9 SPECIFICATION LIMITS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS ...........................................................................................10 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS SPECIFICATION LIMITS, SECTION 15.207......................................................................10 RADIATED EMISSIONS SPECIFICATION LIMITS, SECTION 15.209 .........................................................................10 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS - CONDUCTED EMISSIONS...............................................................................................11 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS - RADIATED EMISSIONS ..................................................................................................12 APPENDIX 1: Test Equipment Calibration Data......................................................................................................... 1 APPENDIX 2: Test Data Log Sheets ............................................................................................................................... 2 File: R46200 Page 2 of 12 Pages

Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: February 8, 2002 SCOPE An electromagnetic emissions test has been performed on the Savi Technology model EchoPoint Signpost, Model SP-600-101 pursuant to Subpart C of Part 15 of FCC Rules for intentional radiators. Conducted and radiated emissions data has been collected, reduced, and analyzed within this report in accordance with measurement guidelines set forth in ANSI C63.4- 1992 as outlined in Elliott Laboratories test procedures. The intentional radiator above has been tested in a simulated typical installation to demonstrate compliance with the relevant FCC performance and procedural standards. Final system data was gathered in a mode that tended to maximize emissions by varying orientation of EUT, orientation of power and I/O cabling, antenna search height, and antenna polarization. Every practical effort was made to perform an impartial test using appropriate test equipment of known calibration. All pertinent factors have been applied to reach the determination of compliance. The test results recorded herein are based on a single type test of the Savi Technology model EchoPoint Signpost, Model SP-600-101 and therefore apply only to the tested sample. The sample was selected and prepared by Eugene Schlindwein of Savi Technology, Inc. OBJECTIVE The primary objective of the manufacturer is compliance with Subpart C of Part 15 of FCC Rules for the radiated and conducted emissions of intentional radiators. Certification of these devices is required as a prerequisite to marketing as defined in Part 2 the FCC Rules. Certification is a procedure where the manufacturer or a contracted laboratory makes measurements and submits the test data and technical information to the FCC. The FCC issues a grant of equipment authorization upon successful completion of their review of the submitted documents. Once the equipment authorization has been obtained, the label indicating compliance must be attached to all identical units which are subsequently manufactured. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The tested sample of Savi Technology, Inc. model EchoPoint Signpost, Model SP-600-101 complied with the requirements of Subpart C of Part 15 of the FCC Rules for low power intentional radiators. Maintenance of FCC compliance is the responsibility of the manufacturer. Any modification of the product which may result in increased emissions should be checked to ensure compliance has been maintained (i.e., printed circuit board layout changes, different line filter, different power supply, harnessing or I/O cable changes, etc.). File: R46200 Page 3 of 12 Pages

Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: February 8, 2002 EMISSION TEST RESULTS The following emissions tests were performed on the Savi Technology model EchoPoint Signpost, Model SP-600-101. The actual test results are contained in an Appendix of this report. LIMITS OF CONDUCTED INTERFERENCE VOLTAGE The EUT tested complied with the limits detailed in FCC Rules Part 15 Section 15.207. The following measurement was extracted from the data recorded during the conducted emissions scan and represents the highest amplitude emission relative to the specification limit. The actual test data and any correction factors are contained in an Appendix of this report. Frequency Level Power FCC B Detector Comments MHz dBuV Lead Limit Margin QP/Ave 0.6578 45.3 Neutral 48.0 -2.7 QP LIMITS OF RADIATED INTERFERENCE FIELD STRENGTH The EUT tested complied with the limits detailed in FCC Rules Part 15 Section 15.209. The following measurement was extracted from the data recorded during the radiated electric field emissions scan and represents the highest amplitude emission relative to the specification limit. The actual test data and any correction factors are contained in an Appendix of this report. Spurious Emissions, 130kHz – 30 MHz Frequency Level FCC 15.209 Detector Comments kHz dBuV/m Limit Margin Pk/QP/Avg Data extrapolated from 20m to 30m using 40dB 660 26.5 31.2 -4.8 QP per decade correction factor. Fundamental Field Strength @ 132kHz Frequency Level FCC 15.209 Detector Comments kHz dBuV/m Limit Margin Pk/QP/Avg Peak Reading, average limit. Data extrapolated 132 11.2 25.2 -14.0 Pk from 20m to 300m using calculated factor MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES ISO Guide 25 requires that an estimate of the measurement uncertainties associated with the emissions test results be included in the report. The measurement uncertainties given below are based on a 95% confidence level and were calculated in accordance with NAMAS document NIS 81. Measurement Type Frequency Range Calculated Uncertainty (MHz) (dB) ______________________________________________________________ Conducted Emissions 0.15 to 30 ± 2.4 Radiated Emissions 30 to 1000 ± 3.2 File: R46200 Page 4 of 12 Pages

Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: February 8, 2002 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DETAILS GENERAL The Savi Technology model EchoPoint Signpost, Model SP-600-101 is a 132 kHz transmitter (signpost) that is designed to be used as part of an inventory tracking system. Normally, the EUT would be installed at access monitoring and control points, mounted on a wall or pole during operation. The EUT was treated as tabletop equipment during testing to simulate the end user environment. The device was tested in both the flat and upright orientations to ensure that the maximum field strength from the device was recorded. The electrical rating of the EUT is 85-250 VAC, 47-440 Hz, 800/400 mA, 24 VDC, 800 mA. The sample was received on January 18, 2002 and tested on January 18 and February 5, 2002. The EUT consisted of the following component(s): Manufacturer/Model/Description Serial Number Savi Technology SP-600-101 Mobile Signpost Tag 1005 Reader ENCLOSURE The EUT enclosure is primarily constructed of fabricated molded plastic. It measures approximately 17.5 cm wide by 17.5 cm deep by 7.5 cm high. MODIFICATIONS The EUT did not require modifications during testing in order to comply with emissions specifications. SUPPORT EQUIPMENT No support equipment was used during testing. EUT INTERFACE PORTS The I/O cabling configuration during emissions testing was as follows: Cable(s) Port Connected To Description Shielded or Unshielded Length(m) Sync In Unterminated multiwire Unshielded 15 Sync Out Unterminated multiwire Unshielded 15 Sensor 1 Unterminated multiwire Unshielded 3 Sensor 2 Unterminated multiwire Unshielded 3 Power AC Mains 3 wire Shielded 2 EUT OPERATION The EUT was continuously transmitting during testing. File: R46200 Page 5 of 12 Pages

Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: February 8, 2002 TEST SITE GENERAL INFORMATION Final test measurements were taken on January 18 and February 5, 2002 at the Elliott Laboratories Open Area Test Site #1 & 2 located at 684 West Maude Avenue, Sunnyvale, California. The test site contains separate areas for radiated and conducted emissions testing. Pursuant to section 2.948 of the Rules, construction, calibration, and equipment data has been filed with the Commission. The FCC recommends that ambient noise at the test site be at least 6 dB below the allowable limits. Ambient levels are below this requirement with the exception of predictable local TV, radio, and mobile communications traffic. The test site contains separate areas for radiated and conducted emissions testing. Considerable engineering effort has been expended to ensure that the facilities conform to all pertinent FCC requirements. CONDUCTED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS Conducted emissions testing is performed in conformance with ANSI C63.4-1992. Measurements are made with the EUT connected to the public power network through a nominal, standardized RF impedance, which is provided by a line impedance stabilization network, known as a LISN. A LISN is inserted in series with each current-carrying conductor in the EUT power cord. RADIATED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS The FCC has determined that radiation measurements made in a shielded enclosure are not suitable for determining levels of radiated emissions. Radiated measurements are performed in an open field environment. The test site is maintained free of conductive objects within the CISPR defined elliptical area incorporated in ANSI C63.4 guidelines. File: R46200 Page 6 of 12 Pages

Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: February 8, 2002 MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION RECEIVER SYSTEM An EMI receiver as specified in CISPR 16-1 is used for emissions measurements. The receivers used can measure over the frequency range of 9 kHz up to 2000 MHz. These receivers allow both ease of measurement and high accuracy to be achieved. The receivers have Peak, Average, and CISPR (Quasi-peak) detectors built into their design so no external adapters are necessary. The receiver automatically sets the required bandwidth for the CISPR detector used during measurements. For measurements above the frequency range of the receivers, a spectrum analyzer is utilized because it provides visibility of the entire spectrum along with the precision and versatility required to support engineering analysis. Average measurements above 1000MHz are performed on the spectrum analyzer using the linear-average method with a resolution bandwidth of 1 MHz and a video bandwidth of 10 Hz. INSTRUMENT CONTROL COMPUTER The receivers utilize either a Rohde and Schwarz EZM Spectrum Monitor/Controller or contain an internal Spectrum Monitor/Controller to view and convert the receiver measurements to the field strength at an antenna or voltage developed at the LISN measurement port, which is then compared directly with the appropriate specification limit. This provides faster, more accurate readings by performing the conversions described under Sample Calculations within the Test Procedures section of this report. Results are printed in a graphic and/or tabular format, as appropriate. A personal computer is used to record all measurements made with the receivers. The Spectrum Monitor provides a visual display of the signal being measured. In addition, the controller or a personal computer run automated data collection programs which control the receivers. This provides added accuracy since all site correction factors, such as cable loss and antenna factors are added automatically. LINE IMPEDANCE STABILIZATION NETWORK (LISN) Line conducted measurements utilize a fifty microhenry Line Impedance Stabilization Network as the monitoring point. The LISN used also contains a 250 uH CISPR adapter. This network provides for calibrated radio frequency noise measurements by the design of the internal low pass and high pass filters on the EUT and measurement ports, respectively. FILTERS/ATTENUATORS External filters and precision attenuators are often connected between the receiving antenna or LISN and the receiver. This eliminates saturation effects and non-linear operation due to high amplitude transient events. File: R46200 Page 7 of 12 Pages

Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: February 8, 2002 ANTENNAS A biconical antenna is used to cover the range from 30 MHz to 300 MHz and a log periodic antenna is utilized from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. Narrowband tuned dipole antennas are used over the entire 30 to 1000 MHz range for precision measurements of field strength. Above 1000 MHz, a horn antenna is used. The antenna calibration factors are included in site factors programmed into the test receivers. ANTENNA MAST AND EQUIPMENT TURNTABLE The antennas used to measure the radiated electric field strength are mounted on a non- conductive antenna mast equipped with a motor-drive to vary the antenna height. ANSI C63.4 specifies that the test height above ground for table mounted devices shall be 80 centimeters. Floor mounted equipment shall be placed on the ground plane if the device is normally used on a conductive floor or separated from the ground plane by insulating material from 3 to 12 mm if the device is normally used on a non-conductive floor. During radiated measurements, the EUT is positioned on a motorized turntable in conformance with this requirement. INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION All test equipment is regularly checked to ensure that performance is maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. All antennas are calibrated at regular intervals with respect to tuned half-wave dipoles. An Appendix of this report contains the list of test equipment used and calibration information. File: R46200 Page 8 of 12 Pages

Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: February 8, 2002 TEST PROCEDURES EUT AND CABLE PLACEMENT The FCC requires that interconnecting cables be connected to the available ports of the unit and that the placement of the unit and the attached cables simulate the worst case orientation that can be expected from a typical installation, so far as practicable. To this end, the position of the unit and associated cabling is varied within the guidelines of ANSI C63.4, and the worst case orientation is used for final measurements. CONDUCTED EMISSIONS Conducted emissions are measured at the plug end of the power cord supplied with the EUT. Excess power cord length is wrapped in a bundle between 30 and 40 centimeters in length near the center of the cord. Preliminary measurements are made to determine the highest amplitude emission relative to the specification limit for all the modes of operation. Placement of system components and varying of cable positions are performed in each mode. A final peak mode scan is then performed in the position and mode for which the highest emission was noted on all current carrying conductors of the power cord. RADIATED EMISSIONS Radiated emissions measurements are performed in two phases as well. A preliminary scan of emissions is conducted in which all significant EUT frequencies are identified with the system in a nominal configuration. At least two scans are performed from 30 MHz up to the frequency required by the regulation specified on page 1. One or more of these is with the antenna polarized vertically while the one or more of these is with the antenna polarized horizontally. During the preliminary scans, the EUT is rotated through 360°, the antenna height is varied and cable positions are varied to determine the highest emission relative to the limit. A speaker is provided in the receiver to aid in discriminating between EUT and ambient emissions. Other methods used during the preliminary scan for EUT emissions involve scanning with near field magnetic loops, monitoring I/O cables with RF current clamps, and cycling power to the EUT. Final maximization is a phase in which the highest amplitude emissions identified in the spectral search are viewed while the EUT azimuth angle is varied from 0 to 360 degrees relative to the receiving antenna. The azimuth which results in the highest emission is then maintained while varying the antenna height from one to four meters. The result is the identification of the highest amplitude for each of the highest peaks. Each recorded level is corrected in the receiver using appropriate factors for cables, connectors, antennas, and preamplifier gain. Emissions which have values close to the specification limit may also be measured with a tuned dipole antenna to determine compliance. File: R46200 Page 9 of 12 Pages

Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: February 8, 2002 SPECIFICATION LIMITS AND SAMPLE CALCULATIONS The limits for conducted emissions are given in units of microvolts, and the limits for radiated emissions are given in units of microvolts per meter at a specified test distance. Data is measured in the logarithmic form of decibels relative to one microvolt, or dB microvolts (dBuV). For radiated emissions, the measured data is converted to the field strength at the antenna in dB microvolts per meter (dBuV/m). The results are then converted to the linear forms of uV and uV/m for comparison to published specifications. For reference, converting the specification limits from linear to decibel form is accomplished by taking the base ten logarithm, then multiplying by 20. These limits in both linear and logarithmic form are as follows: CONDUCTED EMISSIONS SPECIFICATION LIMITS, SECTION 15.207 Frequency Range Limit Limit (MHz) (uV) (dBuV) __________________________________________________________________ 0.450 to 30.000 250 48 RADIATED EMISSIONS SPECIFICATION LIMITS, SECTION 15.209 Frequency Range Limit Limit (MHz) (uV/m @ 3m) (dBuV/m @ 3m) ___________________________________________________________________ 0.009-0.490 2400/F KHz @ 300m 67.6-20*log10(FKHz) @ 300m 0.490-1.705 24000/F KHz @ 30m 87.6-20*log10(FKHz) @ 30m 1.705 to 30 30 @ 30m 29.5 @ 30m 30 to 88 100 40 88 to 216 150 43.5 216 to 960 200 46.0 Above 960 500 54.0 File: R46200 Page 10 of 12 Pages

Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: February 8, 2002 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS - CONDUCTED EMISSIONS Receiver readings are compared directly to the conducted emissions specification limit (decibel form) as follows: Rr - B = C and C-S=M where: Rr = Receiver Reading in dBuV B = Broadband Correction Factor* C = Corrected Reading in dBuV S = Specification Limit in dBuV M = Margin to Specification in +/- dB * Broadband Level - Per ANSI C63.4, 13 dB may be subtracted from the quasi-peak level if it is determined that the emission is broadband in nature. If the signal level in the average mode is six dB or more below the signal level in the peak mode, the emission is classified as broadband. File: R46200 Page 11 of 12 Pages

Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: February 8, 2002 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS - RADIATED EMISSIONS Receiver readings are compared directly to the specification limit (decibel form). The receiver internally corrects for cable loss, preamplifier gain, and antenna factor. The calculations are in the reverse direction of the actual signal flow, thus cable loss is added and the amplifier gain is subtracted. The Antenna Factor converts the voltage at the antenna coaxial connector to the field strength at the antenna elements. A distance factor, when used for electric field measurements, is calculated by using the following formula: Fd = 20*LOG10 (Dm/Ds) where: Fd = Distance Factor in dB Dm = Measurement Distance in meters Ds = Specification Distance in meters Measurement Distance is the distance at which the measurements were taken and Specification Distance is the distance at which the specification limits are based. The antenna factor converts the voltage at the antenna coaxial connector to the field strength at the antenna elements. The margin of a given emission peak relative to the limit is calculated as follows: Rc = Rr + Fd and M = Rc - Ls where: Rr = Receiver Reading in dBuV/m Fd = Distance Factor in dB Rc = Corrected Reading in dBuV/m Ls = Specification Limit in dBuV/m M = Margin in dB Relative to Spec File: R46200 Page 12 of 12 Pages

Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: February 8, 2002 APPENDIX 1: Test Equipment Calibration Data File: R46200 Appendix Page 1 of 12

Conducted Emissions, 21-Jan-02 Engineer: jay Manufacturer Description Model # Assett # Cal interval Last Calibrated Cal Due Rohde & Schwarz Test Receiver, 9kHz-2750MHz ESCS 30 EMI 1337 12 12/26/2001 12/26/2002 Solar Electronics Co LISN 8028-50-TS-24-BNC 904 12 5/18/2001 5/18/2002 Rohde & Schwarz Pulse Limiter ESH3 Z2 372 12 7/27/2001 7/27/2002 Radiated Emissions, 30 - 1000 MHz, 05-Feb-02 Engineer: jmartinez Manufacturer Description Model # Assett # Cal interval Last Calibrated Cal Due EMCO Biconical Antenna, 30-300 MHz 3110B 1320 12 5/23/2001 5/23/2002 EMCO Log Periodic Antenna, 0.2-1 GHz 3146 1294 12 3/27/2001 3/27/2002 Rohde & Schwarz Test Receiver, 20-1300 MHz ESVP 1317 12 5/9/2001 5/9/2002 Conducted Emissions, 05-Feb-02 Engineer: jmartinez Manufacturer Description Model # Assett # Cal interval Last Calibrated Cal Due Elliott Laboratories FCC / CISPR LISN LISN-3, OATS 304 12 6/14/2001 6/14/2002 Rohde& Schwarz Pulse Limiter ESH3 Z2 812 12 1/23/2002 1/23/2003 Rohde & Schwarz Test Receiver, 0.009-30 MHz ESH3 1316 12 5/9/2001 5/9/2002 Fundamental and Harmonic below 30MHz, 05-Feb-02 Engineer: jmartinez Manufacturer Description Model # Assett # Cal interval Last Calibrated Cal Due EMCO Magnetic Loop Antenna, 10k-30MHz 6502 1299 12 12/26/2001 12/26/2002 Rohde & Schwarz Test Receiver, 0.009-30 MHz ESH3 1316 12 5/9/2001 5/9/2002 File: T45873.xls Test Equipment (Emissions) 1 of 1

Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: February 8, 2002 APPENDIX 2: Test Data Log Sheets ELECTROMAGNETIC EMISSIONS TEST LOG SHEETS AND MEASUREMENT DATA T45873 12 Pages File: R46200 Appendix Page 2 of 12

EMC Test Data Client: Savi Job Number: J45866 Model: SP-600-101 T-Log Number: T45873 Proj Eng: Mark Briggs Contact: Gene Schlindwein Emissions Spec: FCC Class: A Immunity Spec: - Environment: - EMC Test Data For The Savi Model SP-600-101 T-Log: T45873.xls, Rev 1.0 Cover Page 1 of 10

EMC Test Data Client: Savi Job Number: J45866 Model: SP-600-101 T-Log Number: T45873 Proj Eng: Mark Briggs Contact: Gene Schlindwein Emissions Spec: FCC Class: A Immunity Spec: - Environment: - EUT INFORMATION General Description The EUT is a 132 kHz transmitter (signpost) which is designed to be used as part of an inventory tracking system. Normally, the EUT would be installed at access monitoring and control points, mounted on a wall or pole during operation. The EUT was, therefore, treated as table-top equipment during testing to simulate the end user environment. The electrical rating of the EUT is 85-250 VAC, 47-440 Hz, 800/400 mA, 24 VDC, 800 mA. Equipment Under Test Manufacturer Model Description Serial Number FCC ID mobile Signpost Tag Savi Technology SP-600-101 1005 reader Other EUT Details The SP-600-101 and SP-600-201 are identical except for antenna. The SP-600-101 has the internal antenna and the SP-600- 201 has the external antenna. EUT Enclosure The EUT enclosure is primarily constructed of fabricated molded plastic. It measures approximately 17.5 cm wide by 17.5 cm deep by 7.5 cm high. Modification History Mod. # Test Date Modification 1 2 3 T-Log: T45873.xls, Rev 1.0 EUT Descrip Page 2 of 10

EMC Test Data Client: Savi Job Number: J45866 Model: SP-600-101 T-Log Number: T45873 Proj Eng: Mark Briggs Contact: Gene Schlindwein Emissions Spec: FCC Class: A Immunity Spec: - Environment: - Test Configuration #1 Local Support Equipment Manufacturer Model Description Serial Number FCC ID none Remote Support Equipment Manufacturer Model Description Serial Number FCC ID none Interface Ports Cable(s) Port Connected To Description Shielded or Unshielded Length(m) Sync In Unterminated multiwire Unshielded 15 Sync Out Unterminated multiwire Unshielded 15 Sensor 1 Unterminated multiwire Unshielded 3 Sensor 2 Unterminated multiwire Unshielded 3 Power AC Mains 3 wire Shielded 2 EUT Operation During Emissions The EUT was in a normal operating mode, continuously transmitting. T-Log: T45873.xls, Rev 1.0 Test Configuration #1 Page 3 of 10

EMC Test Data Client: Savi Job Number: J45866 Model: SP-600-101 T-Log Number: T45873 Proj Eng: Mark Briggs Contact: Gene Schlindwein Spec: FCC Class: A Conducted Emissions - Power Ports Test Specifics Objective: The objective of this test session is to perform final qualification testing of the EUT with respect to the specification listed above. Date of Test: 1/18/2002 Config. Used: 1 Test Engineer: Jay Dickinson Config Change: none Test Location: SVOATS #1 EUT Voltage: 120V/60Hz General Test Configuration For tabletop equipment, the EUT was located on a wooden table, 40 cm from a vertical coupling plane and 80cm from the LISN. A second LISN was used for all local support equipment. Ambient Conditions: Temperature: 13°C Rel. Humidity: 40% Summary of Results Run # Test Performed Limit Result Margin 1 CE, AC Power 120V/60Hz FCC B Pass -2.7dB @ .658MHz Modifications Made During Testing: No Modifications performed. Deviations From The Standard No deviations were made from the requirements of the standard. T-Log: T45873.xls, Rev 1.0 (FQ) AC CE 18-Jan-02 Page 4 of 10

EMC Test Data Client: Savi Job Number: J45866 Model: SP-600-101 T-Log Number: T45873 Proj Eng: Mark Briggs Contact: Gene Schlindwein Spec: FCC Class: A Run #1: AC Power Port Conducted Emissions, 0.15 - 30MHz,120V/60Hz Frequency Level AC FCC B Detector Comments MHz dBµV Line Limit Margin QP/Ave 0.6578 45.3 Neutral 48.0 -2.7 QP 0.6585 45.1 Neutral 48.0 -2.9 QP 0.6578 44.8 Line 48.0 -3.2 QP 0.6585 44.7 Line 48.0 -3.3 QP 0.9220 42.2 Neutral 48.0 -5.8 QP 0.9220 41.2 Line 48.0 -6.8 QP 10.8960 37.0 Neutral 48.0 -11.0 QP 10.8960 35.0 Line 48.0 -13.0 QP 5.0000 31.6 Line 48.0 -16.4 QP 5.0000 29.0 Neutral 48.0 -19.0 QP T-Log: T45873.xls, Rev 1.0 (FQ) AC CE 18-Jan-02 Page 5 of 10



EMC Test Data Client: Savi Job Number: J45866 Model: SP-600-101 T-Log Number: T45873 Proj Eng: Mark Briggs Contact: Gene Schlindwein Spec: FCC Class: A Radiated Emissions - FCC 15.209 Radio Test Specifics Objective: The objective is to perform preliminary measurements of the fundamental field strength and field strength of spurious emissions at 3m, 10m, and 20m. Date of Test: 2/5/2002 Config. Used: See below Test Engineer: J Martinez Config Change: None Test Location: SVOATS #2 EUT Voltage: 120Vac, 60Hz General Test Configuration The radio and integral antennae were located on a table during testing. For radiated emissions testing below 30 MHz the measurement antenna was located 4.6, 10, and 20 meters from the EUT as noted. Radiated magnetic field measurements were made with the loop antenna located one meter above the ground plane. The loop was place 0 degress (Open Loop) and 90 degress (Close Loop). Ambient Conditions: Temperature: 14.4°C Rel. Humidity: 53% Summary of Results Run # Test Performed Limit Result Margin 1,2 Fundamental 15.209 Pass -14dB @ 132 kHz 1,3 Spurious 15.209 Pass -4.8dB @ 660 kHz Modifications Made During Testing: No modifications were made to the EUT during testing Deviations From The Standard No deviations were made from the requirements of the standard. T-Log: T45873.xls, Rev 1.0 (FQ) RE 15.209 Radio 05-Feb-02 Page 6 of 10

EMC Test Data Client: Savi Job Number: J45866 Model: SP-600-101 T-Log Number: T45873 Proj Eng: Mark Briggs Contact: Gene Schlindwein Spec: FCC Class: A Run #1: Fundamental Field Strength -CW Mode w/ Unit Parallel to Table. Below 150kHz a bandwidth of 1 kHz was used (Test receiver ESN) EUT Loop antenna, Asset #1299, was elevated 1.00 meters from ground plane. Frequency Reading AF Level AF Level Detector Distance Comments MHz dBµV dB dBuV/m dB dBuA/m (m) 0.132 66.0 10.5 76.5 -41.0 25.0 Pk 20.0 Open Loop 0.132 65.5 10.5 76.0 -41.0 24.5 AV 20.0 Open Loop 0.132 63.2 10.5 73.7 -41.0 22.2 Pk 20.0 Close Loop (Antenna Asset # 1299) 0.132 62.2 10.5 72.7 -41.0 21.2 AV 20.0 Close Loop (Antenna Asset # 1299) 0.132 84.7 10.5 95.2 -41.0 43.7 Pk 10.0 Open Loop 0.132 83.9 10.5 94.4 -41.0 42.9 AV 10.0 Open Loop 0.132 79.3 10.5 89.8 -41.0 38.3 Pk 10.0 Close Loop 0.132 78.5 10.5 89.0 -41.0 37.5 AV 10.0 Close Loop 0.132 113.7 10.5 124.2 -41.0 72.7 Pk 3.0 Open Loop 0.132 113.3 10.5 123.8 -41.0 72.3 AV 3.0 Open Loop 0.132 109.1 10.5 119.6 -41.0 68.1 Pk 3.0 Close Loop 0.132 108.7 10.5 119.2 -41.0 67.7 AV 3.0 Close Loop Data Summary - Extrapolation Factor Level At Test Distance Freq @3m @10m @20m (kHz) dBuV/m dBuA/m dBuV/m dBuA/m dBuV/m dBuA/m 132 124.2 72.7 95.2 43.7 76.5 25.0 Extrapolation Factors For Fundamental Signal The following extrapolation factors are calculated by dividing the difference between the field strengths at the two distances by the log (base ten) of the ratio of the two distances. 10m to 20m -62.1 3m to 10m -55.5 3m to 20m -57.9 The equation used for extrapolation is: Extrapolation =[ (Fm - F) / Log (Dm/Ds) ] dB Where: Fm = measured field strength in dBuV/m or dBuA/m Ds is the specification test distance Dm is the actual measurement distance used T-Log: T45873.xls, Rev 1.0 (FQ) RE 15.209 Radio 05-Feb-02 Page 7 of 10

EMC Test Data Client: Savi Job Number: J45866 Model: SP-600-101 T-Log Number: T45873 Proj Eng: Mark Briggs Contact: Gene Schlindwein Spec: FCC Class: A The calculated extrapolation factor of -55.5dB was used for extrapolating the fundamental signal level. For spurious emissions the theoretical extrapolation factor of -40dB was used. FCC Part 15.209 Data Freq Level Limit Margin (kHz) (dBuV/m) dBuV/m dB Comment Fundamental at 300m using extrapolation factor 132 11.2 25.2 -14.0 of -55.5 dB per decade of distance (Note 2) 264 -15.4 19.2 -34.6 Field strength extrapolated to 300m (Note 3) 396 1.4 15.7 -14.3 Field strength extrapolated to 300m (Note 3) 528 24.7 33.2 -8.5 Field strength extrapolated to 30m (Note 3) 660 26.5 31.2 -4.8 Field strength extrapolated to 30m (Note 3) 792 22.0 29.6 -7.7 Field strength extrapolated to 30m (Note 3) Notes: Limit is an average limit below 150kHz (with an additional peak limit of the stated average limit plus 20dB), QP above 150kHz. Measurements made with the appropriate detector. Extrapolation factor was applied to the 20 m reading for the fundamental signal and harmonics. For the fundamental the calculated extrapolation factor of 55.5dB was used, for all others a 40dB factor was used. Note 1: All emission levels for the harmonics were noise floor readings. Harmonics were measured with Open Loop, worst case from Run# 1, at a distance of 20 meters from the EUT. Note 2 : Peak Measurement at 20m was used as the worst case. Note 3: Extrapolation factor of 40Log(Test Distance/Specification Distance) was used for the measurements of the harmonics. T-Log: T45873.xls, Rev 1.0 (FQ) RE 15.209 Radio 05-Feb-02 Page 8 of 10

EMC Test Data Client: Savi Job Number: J45866 Model: SP-600-101 T-Log Number: T45873 Proj Eng: Mark Briggs Contact: Gene Schlindwein Spec: FCC Class: A Run #2c: Fundamental Field Strength -CW Mode w/ Unit Perpendicular to Table. Below 150kHz a bandwidth of 1 kHz was used (Test receiver ESN) EUT Loop antenna, Asset #1299, was elevated 1.00 meters from ground plane. Frequency Reading AF Level AF Level Detector Distance MHz dBµV dB dBuV/m dB dBuA/m (m) 0.132 45.0 10.5 55.5 -41.0 4.0 Pk 20.0 Open Loop 0.132 40.4 10.5 50.9 -41.0 -0.6 Pk 20.0 Close Loop (Antenna Asset # 1299) 0.132 66.0 10.5 76.5 -41.0 25.0 Pk 10.0 Open Loop 0.132 65.6 10.5 76.1 -41.0 24.6 AV 10.0 Open Loop 0.132 50.3 10.5 60.8 -41.0 9.3 Pk 10.0 Close Loop 0.132 48.0 10.5 58.5 -41.0 7.0 AV 10.0 Close Loop 0.132 100.2 10.5 110.7 -41.0 59.2 Pk 3.0 Open Loop 0.132 100.0 10.5 110.5 -41.0 59.0 AV 3.0 Open Loop 0.132 76.0 10.5 86.5 -41.0 35.0 Pk 3.0 Close Loop 0.132 75.9 10.5 86.4 -41.0 34.9 AV 3.0 Close Loop Data Summary Level At Test Distance Freq @3m @10m @20m (kHz) dBuV/m dBuA/m dBuV/m dBuA/m dBuV/m dBuA/m 132 100.2 48.7 66.0 14.5 45.0 -6.5 Extrapolation Factors For Fundamental Signal The following extrapolation factors are calculated by dividing the difference between the field strengths at the two distances by the log (base ten) of the ratio of the two distances. 10m to 20m -69.8 3m to 10m -65.4 3m to 20m -67.0 The equation used for extrapolation is: Extrapolation =[ (Fm - F) / Log (Dm/Ds) ] dB Where: Fm = measured field strength in dBuV/m or dBuA/m Ds is the specification test distance Dm is the actual measurement distance used The calculated extrapolation factor of -65.4dB was used for extrapolating the fundamental signal level. For spurious emissions the theoretical extrapolation factor of -40dB was used. T-Log: T45873.xls, Rev 1.0 (FQ) RE 15.209 Radio 05-Feb-02 Page 9 of 10

EMC Test Data Client: Savi Job Number: J45866 Model: SP-600-101 T-Log Number: T45873 Proj Eng: Mark Briggs Contact: Gene Schlindwein Spec: FCC Class: A FCC Part 15.209 Data Freq Level Limit Margin (kHz) (dBuV/m) dBuV/m dB Comment Fundamental at 300m using extrapolation factor 132 -31.9 25.2 -57.1 of -65.4 dB per decade of distance (Note 2) 264 -15.4 19.2 -34.6 Field strength extrapolated to 300m (Note 3) 396 -2.8 15.7 -18.5 Field strength extrapolated to 300m (Note 3) 528 24.0 33.2 -9.2 Field strength extrapolated to 30m (Note 3) 660 24.2 31.2 -7.1 Field strength extrapolated to 30m (Note 3) 792 24.0 29.6 -5.7 Field strength extrapolated to 30m (Note 3) Notes: Limit is an average limit below 150kHz (with an additional peak limit of the stated average limit plus 20dB), QP above 150kHz. Measurements made with the appropriate detector. Extrapolation factor was applied to the 20 m reading for the fundamental signal and harmonics. For the fundamental the calculated extrapolation factor of 65.4dB was used, for all others a 40dB factor was used. Note 1: All emission levels for the harmonics were noise floor readings. Harmonics were measured with Open Loop, worst case from Run# 1, at a distance of 20 meters from the EUT. Note 2 : Peak Measurement at 20m was used as the worst case. Note 3: Extrapolation factor of 40Log(Test Distance/Specification Distance) was used for the measurements of the harmonics. T-Log: T45873.xls, Rev 1.0 (FQ) RE 15.209 Radio 05-Feb-02 Page 10 of 10


Document Created: 2002-03-01 10:28:55
Document Modified: 2002-03-01 10:28:55
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC