Test Report (NII SpotCheck)

FCC ID: KA2IR1760A1

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_4115449

FCC Test Report (Spot Check) Report No.: RF180629E05-1 FCC ID: KA2IR1760A1 Original FCC ID: KA2IR867A1 Test Model: DIR-1760 Received Date: June 29, 2018 Test Date: Aug. 04, 2018 Issued Date: Dec. 12, 2018 Applicant: D-Link Corporation Address: 17595 Mt. Herrmann Street Fountain Valley, CA92708 USA Issued By: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Hsin Chu Laboratory Lab Address: E-2, No.1, Li Hsin 1st Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu City 300, Taiwan R.O.C. Test Location: E-2, No.1, Li Hsin 1st Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu City 300, Taiwan R.O.C. FCC Registration / 723255 / TW2022 Designation Number: This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in this report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute your unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specific mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agencies. Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 1 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

Table of Contents Release Control Record .................................................................................................................................. 3 1 Certificate of Conformity ...................................................................................................................... 4 2 Summary of Test Results ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Measurement Uncertainty ................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Modification Record ............................................................................................................................ 5 3 General Information .............................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 General Description of EUT ................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Description of Test Modes ................................................................................................................... 8 3.2.1 Test Mode Applicability and Tested Channel Detail ............................................................................. 9 3.3 Description of Support Units ............................................................................................................. 10 3.3.1 Configuration of System under Test .................................................................................................. 10 3.4 General Description of Applied Standard ........................................................................................... 11 4 Test Types and Results ...................................................................................................................... 12 4.1 Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement ............................................................................. 12 4.1.1 Limits of Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement .............................................................. 12 4.1.2 Test Instruments ................................................................................................................................ 13 4.1.3 Test Procedure .................................................................................................................................. 14 4.1.4 Deviation from Test Standard ............................................................................................................ 14 4.1.5 Test Setup .......................................................................................................................................... 15 4.1.6 EUT Operating Condition .................................................................................................................. 15 4.1.7 Test Results ....................................................................................................................................... 16 4.2 Conducted Emission Measurement .................................................................................................. 18 4.2.1 Limits of Conducted Emission Measurement .................................................................................... 18 4.2.2 Test Instruments ................................................................................................................................ 18 4.2.3 Test Procedure .................................................................................................................................. 19 4.2.4 Deviation from Test Standard ............................................................................................................ 19 4.2.5 Test Setup .......................................................................................................................................... 19 4.2.6 EUT Operating Condition .................................................................................................................. 19 4.2.7 Test Results ....................................................................................................................................... 20 5 Pictures of Test Arrangements .......................................................................................................... 22 Appendix – Information on the Testing Laboratories ................................................................................ 23 Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 2 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

Release Control Record Issue No. Description Date Issued RF180629E05-1 Original release. Dec. 12, 2018 Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 3 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

1 Certificate of Conformity Product: AC1750 Mesh-Enabled Smart Wi-Fi Router Brand: D-Link Test Model: DIR-1760 Sample Status: ENGINEERING SAMPLE Applicant: D-Link Corporation Test Date: Aug. 04, 2018 Standard: 47 CFR FCC Part 15, Subpart E (Section 15.407) ANSI C63.10: 2013 The above equipment has been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the sample’s EMC characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. Prepared by : , Date: Dec. 12, 2018 Wendy Wu / Specialist Approved by : , Date: Dec. 12, 2018 May Chen / Manager Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 4 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

Eooert venitas 2 Summary of Test Results 47 CFR FCC Part 15, Subpart E (Section 15.407) F CC Test Item Result Remarks Clause Meet the requirement of limit. 15.407(b)(6) AC Power Conducted Emissions PASS Minimum passing margin is —13.27dB at 0.36484MHz. . has Meet the requirement of limit. 1/125;;27/(*])/6 Sladlated Emlts*,swns & Band Edge PASS Minimum passing margin is —8.4dB at ( (iy/6) Measuremen 250.02MHz, 125.04MHz. 2.1 Measurement Uncertainty Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for tests performed on the EUT as specified in CISPR 16—4—2: Measurement Frequency Expand(figzl)Jg.e Py Conducted Emissions at mains ports 150kHz ~ 3O0MHz 1.84 dB Radiated Emissions up to 1 GHz 30MHz ~ 1GHz 5.53 dB 2.2 Modification Record There were no modifications required for compliance. Report No.: RF180629E205—1 Page No. 5/ 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

3 General Information 3.1 General Description of EUT Product AC1750 Mesh-Enabled Smart Wi-Fi Router Brand D-Link Test Model DIR-1760 Status of EUT ENGINEERING SAMPLE Power Supply Rating DC 12V from power adapter CCK, DQPSK, DBPSK for DSSS Modulation Type 64QAM, 16QAM, QPSK, BPSK for OFDM 256QAM for OFDM in 11ac mode and VHT20/40 in 2.4GHz band Modulation Technology DSSS,OFDM 802.11b: up to 11Mbps 802.11a/g: up to 54Mbps Transfer Rate 802.11n: up to 450Mbps 802.11ac: up to 1300Mbps 2.4GHz: 2.412GHz ~ 2.462GHz Operating Frequency 5GHz: 5.18GHz ~ 5.24GHz, 5.745GHz ~ 5.825GHz 2.4GHz: 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n (HT20), VHT20: 11 802.11n (HT40), VHT40: 7 Number of Channel 5GHz: 802.11a, 802.11n (HT20), 802.11ac (VHT20): 9 802.11n (HT40), 802.11ac (VHT40): 4 802.11ac (VHT80): 2 Antenna Type Refer to Note Antenna Connector Refer to Note Accessory Device Adapter x1 Data Cable Supplied NA Note: 1. Exhibit prepared for FCC Spot Check Verification report, the format, test items and amount of spot–check test data are decided by applicant’s engineering judgment, for more details pleae refer to declaration letter exhibit. 2. Simultaneously transmission condition. Condition Technology 1 WLAN (2.4GHz) WLAN (5GHz) Note: The emission of the simultaneous operation has been evaluated and no non-compliance was found. 3. The EUT must be supplied with a power adapter as following table: No Brand Model No. Spec. AC Input: 100-240V, 0.8A, 50/60Hz Shenzhen Gongjin 1 S24B72-120A200-0K DC Output: 12V, 2A Electronics Co., Ltd DC Output cable: unshielded, 1.2m Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 6 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

4. The antennas provided to the EUT, please refer to the following table: Ant. Gain(dBi) Frequency Connecter Cable Length Antenna No. Brand Model Including Antenna Type range (MHz) Type (mm) cable loss 4.75 2400~2483.5 1 RF21C02116A Dipole i-pex 130 4.96 5150~5850 4.75 2400~2483.5 2 RF link RF21C02116A Dipole i-pex 130 4.96 5150~5850 3 RF21C02546A 5 2400~2483.5 Dipole i-pex 160 4 RF21C02547A 5 5150~5850 Dipole i-pex 160 5. The EUT incorporates a MIMO function. 2.4GHz Band MODULATION MODE DATA RATE (MCS) TX & RX CONFIGURATION 802.11b 1 ~ 11Mbps 3TX 3RX 802.11g 6 ~ 54Mbps 3TX 3RX MCS 0~7 3TX 3RX 802.11n (HT20) MCS 8~15 3TX 3RX MCS 16~23 3TX 3RX MCS 0~7 3TX 3RX 802.11n (HT40) MCS 8~15 3TX 3RX MCS 16~23 3TX 3RX MCS 0~8, Nss=1 3TX 3RX VHT20 MCS 0~8, Nss=2 3TX 3RX MCS 0~9, Nss=3 3TX 3RX MCS 0~9, Nss=1 3TX 3RX VHT40 MCS 0~9, Nss=2 3TX 3RX MCS 0~9, Nss=3 3TX 3RX 5GHz Band MODULATION MODE DATA RATE (MCS) TX & RX CONFIGURATION 802.11a 6 ~ 54Mbps 3TX 3RX MCS 0~7 3TX 3RX 802.11n (HT20) MCS 8~15 3TX 3RX MCS 16~23 3TX 3RX MCS 0~7 3TX 3RX 802.11n (HT40) MCS 8~15 3TX 3RX MCS 16~23 3TX 3RX MCS 0~8, Nss=1 3TX 3RX 802.11ac (VHT20) MCS 0~8, Nss=2 3TX 3RX MCS 0~9, Nss=3 3TX 3RX MCS 0~9, Nss=1 3TX 3RX 802.11ac (VHT40) MCS 0~9, Nss=2 3TX 3RX MCS 0~9, Nss=3 3TX 3RX MCS 0~9, Nss=1 3TX 3RX 802.11ac (VHT80) MCS 0~9, Nss=2 3TX 3RX MCS 0~9, Nss=3 3TX 3RX Note: 1. All of modulation mode support beamforming function except 2.4GHz & 802.11a modulation mode. 2. The EUT support Beamforming and CDD mode, therefore both mode were investigated and the worst case scenario was identified. The worst case data were presented in test report. 3. The modulation and bandwidth are similar for 802.11n mode for 20MHz (40MHz) and 802.11ac mode for 20MHz (40MHz), therefore investigated worst case to representative mode in test report. (Final test mode refer section 3.2.1) 6. The above EUT information is declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description, please refer to the manufacturer's specifications or user's manual. Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 7 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

3.2 Description of Test Modes FOR 5180 ~ 5240MHz 4 channels are provided for 802.11a, 802.11n (HT20), 802.11ac (VHT20): Channel Frequency Channel Frequency 36 5180 MHz 44 5220 MHz 40 5200 MHz 48 5240 MHz 2 channels are provided for 802.11n (HT40), 802.11ac (VHT40): Channel Frequency Channel Frequency 38 5190 MHz 46 5230 MHz 1 channel is provided for 802.11ac (VHT80): Channel Frequency 42 5210 MHz FOR 5745 ~ 5825MHz: 5 channels are provided for 802.11a, 802.11n (HT20), 802.11ac (VHT20): Channel Frequency Channel Frequency 149 5745 MHz 161 5805 MHz 153 5765 MHz 165 5825 MHz 157 5785 MHz 2 channels are provided for 802.11n (HT40), 802.11ac (VHT40): Channel Frequency Channel Frequency 151 5755 MHz 159 5795 MHz 1 channel is provided for 802.11ac (VHT80): Channel Frequency 155 5775 MHz Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 8 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

3.2.1 Test Mode Applicability and Tested Channel Detail EUT Applicable To Configure Description Mode RE<1G PLC - √ √ - Where RE<1G: Radiated Emission below 1GHz PLC: Power Line Conducted Emission NOTE: 1. The EUT had been pre-tested on the positioned of each 2 axis. The worst case was found when positioned on X-plane. (below 1GHz) & Y-plane (above 1GHz). Radiated Emission Test (Below 1GHz): Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. CDD Mode FREQ. Band Available Tested Modulation Modulation Data Rate Mode (MHz) Channel Channel Technology Type (Mbps) 5180-5240 36 to 48 802.11a 157 OFDM BPSK 6 5745-5825 149 to 165 Power Line Conducted Emission Test: Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. CDD Mode FREQ. Band Available Tested Modulation Modulation Data Rate Mode (MHz) Channel Channel Technology Type (Mbps) 5180-5240 36 to 48 802.11a 157 OFDM BPSK 6 5745-5825 149 to 165 Test Condition: Applicable To Environmental Conditions Input Power Tested By RE<1G 22deg. C, 67%RH 120Vac, 60Hz Frank Chaing PLC 24deg. C, 72%RH 120Vac, 60Hz Andy Ho Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 9 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

3.3 Description of Support Units The EUT has been tested as an independent unit together with other necessary accessories or support units. The following support units or accessories were used to form a representative test configuration during the tests. ID Product Brand Model No. Serial No. FCC ID Remarks A. Laptop DELL E6420 B92T3R1 FCC DoC Provided by Lab B. Laptop DELL E5430 HYV4VY1 FCC DoC Provided by Lab C. USB Disk Tracscend NA NA NA Provided by Lab Note: 1. All power cords of the above support units are non-shielded (1.8m). Shielding ID Descriptions Qty. Length (m) Cores (Qty.) Remarks (Yes/No) 1. DC Cable 1 1.2 No 0 Supplied by client 2. RJ-45 Cable 1 10 No 0 Provided by Lab 3. RJ-45 Cable 1 10 No 0 Provided by Lab 3.3.1 Configuration of System under Test Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 10 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

3.4 General Description of Applied Standard The EUT is a RF Product. According to the specifications of the manufacturer, it must comply with the requirements of the following standards: FCC Part 15, Subpart E (15.407) KDB 789033 D02 General UNII Test Procedure New Rules v02r01 ANSI C63.10-2013 All test items have been performed and recorded as per the above standards. Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 11 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

C Eooert venitas 4 Test Types and Results 4.1 Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement 4.1.1 Limits of Radiated Emission and Bandedge Measurement Radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands must comply with the radiated emission limits specified as below table. Fre(q'\LAer;;;ies (mféergjvzggg;g 1 Measurement Distance (meters) 0.009 ~ 0.490 2400/F(kHz) 300 0.490 ~ 1.705 24000/F(kHz) 30 1.705 ~ 30.0 30 30 30 ~ 88 100 3 88 ~216 150 3 216 ~ 960 200 3 Above 960 500 3 NOTE: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. 2. Emission level (dBuV/m) = 20 log Emission level (uV/m). 3. For frequencies above 1000MHz, the field strength limits are based on average detector, however, the peak field strength of any emission shall not exceed the maximum permitted average limits, specified above by more than 20dB under any condition of modulation. Limits of unwanted emission out of the restricted bands Applicable To Limit 789033 DO2 General UNII Test Procedure Field Strength at 3m New Rules v02r01 PK:74 (dBuV/m) AV:54 (dBuV/m) Frequency Band Applicable To EIRP Limit posksioat Féen'qd se 5150~5250 MHz 15.407(b)(1) 5250~5350 MHz 15.407(b)(2) PK:—27 (dBm/MHz) PK:68.2(dBuV/im) 5470~5725 MHz 15.407(b)(3) PK:—27 (dBm/MHz) " PK: 68.2(dBuV/m) 12 . PK:10 (dBm/MHz) * PK:105.2 (dBuV/m) 5725~5850 MHz BJ 15.407(b)(4)(i) PK:15.6 (dBm/MHz) * PK: 110.8(dBuVim) * PK:27 (dBm/MHz) * PK:122.2 (dBuV/im) * C 15.407(b)(4)(ii) Emission limits in section 15.247(d) * below the band edge increasing linearly to 10 "‘ beyond 75 MHz or more above of the band edge. _ dBm/MHz at 25 MHz above. * below the band edge increasing linearly to a level * from 5 MHz above or below the band edge of 15.6 dBm/MHz at 5 MHz above. increasing linearly to a level of 27 dBm/MHz at the band edge. Note: The following formula is used to convert the equipment isotropic radiated power (eirp) to field strength: 1000000Y/30P E = ——————— V/m, where P is the eirp (Waits). 3 Report No.: RF180629E205—1 Page No. 12 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

4.1.2 Test Instruments For Below 1GHz: DESCRIPTION & CALIBRATED CALIBRATED MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER DATE UNTIL Test Receiver N9038A MY50010156 July 12, 2018 July 11, 2019 Agilent Pre-Amplifier EMC001340 980142 Feb. 09, 2018 Feb. 08, 2019 EMCI (*) Loop Antenna EM-6879 264 Dec. 16, 2016 Dec. 15, 2018 Electro-Metrics RF Cable NA LOOPCAB-001 Jan. 15, 2018 Jan. 14, 2019 RF Cable NA LOOPCAB-002 Jan. 15, 2018 Jan. 14, 2019 Pre-Amplifier ZFL-1000VH2 AMP-ZFL-05 May 05, 2018 May 04, 2019 Mini-Circuits B Trilog Broadband Antenna VULB 9168 9168-361 Nov. 29, 2017 Nov. 28, 2018 SCHWARZBECK RF Cable 8D 966-3-1 Mar. 20, 2018 Mar. 19, 2019 RF Cable 8D 966-3-2 Mar. 20, 2018 Mar. 19, 2019 RF Cable 8D 966-3-3 Mar. 20, 2018 Mar. 19, 2019 Fixed attenuator UNAT-5+ PAD-3m-3-01 Oct. 03, 2017 Oct. 02, 2018 Mini-Circuits ADT_Radiated Software NA NA NA _V8.7.08 Antenna Tower & Turn Table MF-7802 MF780208406 NA NA Max-Full Note: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. *The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 24 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 3. The test was performed in 966 Chamber No. 3. 4. The CANADA Site Registration No. is 20331-1 5. Loop antenna was used for all emissions below 30 MHz. 6. Tested Date: Aug. 04, 2018 Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 13 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

4.1.3 Test Procedure For Radiated emission below 30MHz a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters above the ground at a 3 meter chamber room. The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. b. The EUT was set 3 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower. c. Parallel, perpendicular, and ground-parallel orientations of the antenna are set to make the measurement. d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading. e. The test-receiver system was set to Quasi-Peak Detect Function and Specified Bandwidth with Maximum Hold Mode. NOTE: 1. The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 9kHz at frequency below 30MHz. For Radiated emission above 30MHz a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters above the ground at 3 meter chamber room for test. The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. b. The EUT was set 3 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower. c. The height of antenna is varied from one meter to four meters above the ground to determine the maximum value of the field strength. Both horizontal and vertical polarizations of the antenna are set to make the measurement. d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and then the antenna was tuned to heights from 1 meter to 4 meters and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading. e. The test-receiver system was set to quasi-peak detect function and specified bandwidth with maximum hold mode when the test frequency is below 1 GHz. Note: 1. The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 120kHz for Quasi-peak detection (QP) at frequency below 1GHz. 2. All modes of operation were investigated and the worst-case emissions are reported. 4.1.4 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 14 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

4.1.5 Test Setup For Radiated emission below 30MHz 1m EUT& 3m Support Units Turn Table 80cm Ground Plane Test Receiver For Radiated emission 30MHz to 1GHz Ant. Tower 1-4m Variable 3m 10m EUT& Support Units Turn Table 80cm Ground Plane Test Receiver For the actual test configuration, please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). 4.1.6 EUT Operating Condition a. Connected the EUT with the Laptop which is placed on remote site. b. Controlling software (MT7615 QA 0.0.1.73) has been activated to set the EUT on specific status. Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 15 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

4.1.7 Test Results Below 1GHz Data: 802.11a CHANNEL TX Channel 157 DETECTOR Quasi-Peak (QP) FREQUENCY RANGE 9kHz ~ 1GHz FUNCTION ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 90.21 32.1 QP 43.5 -11.4 2.00 H 273 45.7 -13.6 2 125.04 33.9 QP 43.5 -9.6 2.00 H 284 43.2 -9.3 3 157.53 33.8 QP 43.5 -9.7 1.50 H 99 41.4 -7.6 4 250.02 37.6 QP 46.0 -8.4 1.00 H 118 46.5 -8.9 5 500.01 37.5 QP 46.0 -8.5 1.50 H 145 39.5 -2.0 6 750.01 34.4 QP 46.0 -11.6 2.00 H 154 31.1 3.3 REMARKS: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) – Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. Margin value = Emission Level – Limit value 4. The emission levels were very low against the limit of frequency range 9kHz~30MHz: the amplitude of spurious emissions attenuated more than 20 dB below the permissible value to be report. Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 16 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

CHANNEL TX Channel 157 DETECTOR Quasi-Peak (QP) FREQUENCY RANGE 9kHz ~ 1GHz FUNCTION ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 125.04 35.1 QP 43.5 -8.4 1.00 V 189 44.4 -9.3 2 158.31 30.0 QP 43.5 -13.5 1.00 V 127 37.7 -7.7 3 250.02 34.4 QP 46.0 -11.6 1.50 V 202 43.3 -8.9 4 500.04 36.5 QP 46.0 -9.5 1.00 V 236 38.5 -2.0 5 673.01 31.3 QP 46.0 -14.7 1.50 V 0 29.9 1.4 6 750.03 34.2 QP 46.0 -11.8 2.00 V 360 30.9 3.3 REMARKS: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) – Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. Margin value = Emission Level – Limit value 4. The emission levels were very low against the limit of frequency range 9kHz~30MHz: the amplitude of spurious emissions attenuated more than 20 dB below the permissible value to be report. Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 17 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

4.2 Conducted Emission Measurement 4.2.1 Limits of Conducted Emission Measurement Conducted Limit (dBuV) Frequency (MHz) Quasi-peak Average 0.15 - 0.5 66 - 56 56 - 46 0.50 - 5.0 56 46 5.0 - 30.0 60 50 Note: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. 2. The limit decreases in line with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 to 0.50MHz. 4.2.2 Test Instruments DESCRIPTION & CALIBRATED CALIBRATED MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER DATE UNTIL Test Receiver ESCS 30 847124/029 Nov. 01, 2017 Oct. 31, 2018 R&S Line-Impedance Stabilization Network ESH3-Z5 848773/004 Nov. 15, 2017 Nov. 14, 2018 (for EUT) R&S Line-Impedance Stabilization Network ENV216 100072 June 04, 2018 June 03, 2019 (for Peripheral) R&S 50 ohms Terminator N/A EMC-02 Sep. 22, 2017 Sep. 21, 2018 RF Cable 5D-FB COCCAB-001 Sep. 29, 2017 Sep. 28, 2018 Fixed attenuator STI02-2200-10 003 Mar. 16, 2018 Mar. 15, 2019 EMCI Software BVADT_Cond_ NA NA NA BVADT V7.3.7.4 Note: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments are 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in Conduction 1. 3 Tested Date: Aug. 04, 2018 Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 18 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

uces venitas 4.2.3 Test Procedure a. The EUT was placed 0.4 meters from the conducting wall of the shielded room with EUT being connected to the power mains through a line impedance stabilization network (LISN). Other support units were connected to the power mains through another LISN. The two LISNs provide 50 ohm/ 50uH of coupling impedance for the measuring instrument. b. Both lines of the power mains connected to the EUT were checked for maximum conducted interference. c. The frequency range from 150kHz to 30MHz was searched. Emission levels under (Limit — 200B) was not recorded. NOTE: All modes of operation were investigated and the worst—case emissions are reported. 4.2.4 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.2.5 Test Setup Vertical Ground Reference Plane /Test Receiver tm C___1 6 o 0 o 40cm EUT _ E*~~l 0 o o 0 80cm |LISN N l T L1 L1 L \ Horizonta Ground Reference Plane Note: 1.Support units were connected to second LISN. For the actual test configuration, please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). 4.2.6 EUT Operating Condition Same as 4.1.6. Report No.: RF180629E205—1 Page No. 19 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

4.2.7 Test Results Quasi-Peak (QP) / Phase Line (L) Detector Function Average (AV) Corr. Reading Value Emission Level Limit Margin Freq. No Factor [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] (dB) [MHz] (dB) Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. 1 0.15000 10.05 35.72 16.46 45.77 26.51 66.00 56.00 -20.23 -29.49 2 0.23203 10.08 27.02 15.79 37.10 25.87 62.38 52.38 -25.28 -26.51 3 0.36484 10.11 28.99 25.24 39.10 35.35 58.62 48.62 -19.52 -13.27 4 0.70469 10.15 11.70 -1.73 21.85 8.42 56.00 46.00 -34.15 -37.58 5 2.36719 10.24 12.49 3.10 22.73 13.34 56.00 46.00 -33.27 -32.66 6 8.80859 10.64 18.78 11.94 29.42 22.58 60.00 50.00 -30.58 -27.42 REMARKS: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually. 2. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 3. Margin value = Emission level - Limit value 4. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 5. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value. Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 20 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

Quasi-Peak (QP) / Phase Neutral (N) Detector Function Average (AV) Corr. Reading Value Emission Level Limit Margin Freq. No Factor [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] (dB) [MHz] (dB) Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. 1 0.15000 9.95 35.84 17.54 45.79 27.49 66.00 56.00 -20.21 -28.51 2 0.16562 9.96 34.98 20.83 44.94 30.79 65.18 55.18 -20.24 -24.39 3 0.38438 10.02 18.83 2.07 28.85 12.09 58.18 48.18 -29.33 -36.09 4 8.54688 10.46 21.82 14.35 32.28 24.81 60.00 50.00 -27.72 -25.19 5 11.40234 10.63 20.50 13.87 31.13 24.50 60.00 50.00 -28.87 -25.50 6 25.44531 11.23 6.15 0.83 17.38 12.06 60.00 50.00 -42.62 -37.94 REMARKS: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually. 2. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 3. Margin value = Emission level - Limit value 4. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 5. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value. Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 21 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

5 Pictures of Test Arrangements Please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 22 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2

Appendix – Information on the Testing Laboratories We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are FCC recognized accredited test firms and accredited according to ISO/IEC 17025. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following: Linkou EMC/RF Lab Hsin Chu EMC/RF/Telecom Lab Tel: 886-2-26052180 Tel: 886-3-6668565 Fax: 886-2-26051924 Fax: 886-3-6668323 Hwa Ya EMC/RF/Safety Lab Tel: 886-3-3183232 Fax: 886-3-3270892 Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com Web Site: www.bureauveritas-adt.com The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also. --- END --- Report No.: RF180629E05-1 Page No. 23 / 23 Report Format Version:6.1.2


Document Created: 2019-10-27 02:52:02
Document Modified: 2019-10-27 02:52:02
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC