Test Report

FCC ID: KA2HM101A1

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_1382956

FCC TEST REPORT REPORT NO. : RF990707C24 MODEL NO. : DHM-101 FCC ID : KA2HM101A1 RECEIVED : Jun. 30, 2010 TESTED : Jun. 30 ~ Jul. 27, 2010 ISSUED : Jul. 29, 2010 APPLICANT : D-Link Corporation. ADDRESS : 17595 Mt. Herrmann, Fountain Valley, CA 92708, U.S.A. ISSUED BY : Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch LAB ADDRESS : No. 47, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Tsuen, Lin Kou Hsiang, Taipei Hsien 244, Taiwan, R.O.C. TEST LOCATION : No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Tsuen, Kwei Shan Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien 333, Taiwan, R.O.C. This test report consists of 27 pages in total. It may be duplicated completely for legal use with the approval of the applicant. It should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of our laboratory. The client should not use it to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agency. The test results in the report only apply to the tested sample. Report No.: RF990707C24 1 Report Format Version 3.0.1

Table of Contents 1. CERTIFICATION ...........................................................................................................3 2. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ...................................................................................4 2.1 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ................................................................................4 3. GENERAL INFORMATION............................................................................................5 3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT..............................................................................5 3.2 DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES................................................................................6 3.2.1 CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST ...........................................................6 3.2.2 TEST MODE APPLICABILITY AND TESTED CHANNEL DETAIL ................................7 3.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED STANDARDS ...............................................8 3.4 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS ..........................................................................8 4. TEST TYPES AND RESULTS .......................................................................................9 4.1 RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT .....................................................................9 4.1.1 LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT...................................................9 4.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS ................................................................................................10 4.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES ................................................................................................. 11 4.1.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ....................................................................... 11 4.1.5 TEST SETUP ..............................................................................................................12 4.1.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS ................................................................................12 4.1.7 TEST RESULTS ..........................................................................................................13 4.2 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT ..............................................................18 4.2.1 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT............................................18 4.2.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS ................................................................................................18 4.2.3 TEST PROCEDURES .................................................................................................19 4.2.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD .......................................................................19 4.2.5 TEST SETUP ..............................................................................................................20 4.2.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS ................................................................................20 4.2.7 TEST RESULTS ..........................................................................................................21 4.3 BAND EDGES MEASUREMENT ................................................................................23 4.3.1 LIMITS OF BAND EDGES MEASUREMENT .............................................................23 4.3.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS ................................................................................................23 4.3.3 TEST PROCEDURE ...................................................................................................23 4.3.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD .......................................................................23 4.3.5 EUT OPERATING CONDITION ..................................................................................23 4.3.6 TEST RESULTS ..........................................................................................................24 5. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION..................................................25 6. INFORMATION ON THE TESTING LABORATORIES ................................................26 7. APPENDIX A - MODIFICATIONS RECORDERS FOR ENGINEERING CHANGES TO THE EUT BY THE LAB.........................................................................................27 Report No.: RF990707C24 2 Report Format Version 3.0.1

1. CERTIFICATION PRODUCT: Z-Wave USB Dongle MODEL NO.: DHM-101 BRAND: D-Link APPLICANT: D-Link Corporation. TESTED: Jun. 30 ~ Jul. 27, 2010 TEST SAMPLE: ENGINEERING SAMPLE STANDARDS: FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.249) ANSI C63.4-2003 The above equipment (model: DHM-101) have been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the sample’s EMC characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. PREPARED BY : , DATE : Jul. 29, 2010 Andrea Hsia / Specialist TECHNICAL ACCEPTANCE : , DATE : Jul. 29, 2010 Responsible for RF Long Chen / Senior Engineer APPROVED BY : , DATE : Jul. 29, 2010 Gary Chang / Assistant Manager Report No.: RF990707C24 3 Report Format Version 3.0.1

2. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS The EUT has been tested according to the following specifications: APPLIED STANDARD: FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.249) STANDARD TEST TYPE RESULT REMARK PARAGRAPH Meet the requirement of limit. 15.207 Conducted Emission Test PASS Minimum passing margin is -7.92dB at 0.182MHz. Radiated Emission Test 15.209 Band Edge Measurement Meet the requirement of limit. 15.249 Limit: 50dB less than the peak value of PASS Minimum passing margin is 15.249 (d) fundamental frequency or meet radiated -1.1dB at 2725.20MHz. emission limit in section 15.209 2.1 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for tests performed on the EUT as specified in CISPR 16-4-2: MEASUREMENT FREQUENCY UNCERTAINTY Conducted emissions 9kHz~30MHz 2.44 dB 30MHz ~ 200MHz 2.93 dB 200MHz ~1000MHz 2.95 dB Radiated emissions 1GHz ~ 18GHz 2.26 dB 18GHz ~ 40GHz 1.94 dB This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2. Report No.: RF990707C24 4 Report Format Version 3.0.1

3. GENERAL INFORMATION 3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT EUT Z-Wave USB Dongle MODEL NO. DHM-101 FCC ID KA2HM101A1 POWER SUPPLY 3.3Vdc MODULATION TYPE FSK OPERATING FREQUENCY 908.40MHz & 908.42MHz NUMBER OF CHANNEL 2 ANTENNA TYPE Printed antenna with 3.1dBi gain ANTENNA CONNECTOR NA DATA CABLE NA I/O PORT NA ACCESSORY DEVICES NA NOTE: The above EUT information was declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description, please refer to the manufacturer's specifications or User's Manual. Report No.: RF990707C24 5 Report Format Version 3.0.1

3.2 DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES 2 channels are provided to this EUT. CHANNEL FREQ. (MHz) 1 908.40 2 908.42 3.2.1 CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST Printer Notebook Modem EUT (Power from host equipment) *Test table Report No.: RF990707C24 6 Report Format Version 3.0.1

3.2.2 TEST MODE APPLICABILITY AND TESTED CHANNEL DETAIL EUT APPLICABLE TO CONFIGURE DESCRIPTION MODE RE≥1G RE<1G PLC BM - √ √ √ √ - Where PLC: Power Line Conducted Emission RE<1G: Radiated Emission below 1GHz RE≥1G: Radiated Emission above 1GHz BM: Bandedge Measurement RADIATED EMISSION TEST (ABOVE 1 GHz):  Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. AVAILABLE CHANNEL TESTED CHANNEL MODULATION TYPE 1 to 2 1 FSK RADIATED EMISSION TEST (BELOW 1 GHz):  Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. AVAILABLE CHANNEL TESTED CHANNEL MODULATION TYPE 1 to 2 1 FSK POWER LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST:  Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. AVAILABLE CHANNEL TESTED CHANNEL MODULATION TYPE 1 to 2 1 FSK BANDEDGE MEASUREMENT:  Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, XYZ axis and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. AVAILABLE CHANNEL TESTED CHANNEL MODULATION TYPE 1 to 2 1 FSK Report No.: RF990707C24 7 Report Format Version 3.0.1

TEST CONDITION: INPUT POWER APPLICABLE TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS TESTED BY (SYSTEM) RE≥1G 24deg. C, 63%RH, 1011 hPa 120Vac, 60Hz Kevin Liang RE<1G 24deg. C, 63%RH, 1011 hPa 120Vac, 60Hz Kevin Liang PLC 22deg. C, 65%RH, 1009 hPa 120Vac, 60Hz Daniel Lin BM 24deg. C, 63%RH, 1011 hPa 120Vac, 60Hz Kevin Lian 3.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED STANDARDS The EUT is a RF Product. According to the specifications of the manufacturer, it must comply with the requirements of the following standards: FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.249) ANSI C63.4-2003 All test items have been performed and recorded as per the above standards. NOTE: The EUT is also considered as a kind of computer peripheral, because the connection to computer is necessary for typical use. It has been verified to comply with the requirements of FCC Part 15, Subpart B, Class B (DoC). The test report has been issued separately. 3.4 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS The EUT has been tested as an independent unit together with other necessary accessories or support units. The following support units or accessories were used to form a representative test configuration during the tests. NO. PRODUCT BRAND MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. FCC ID NOTEBOOK 1 DELL PP05L 12130898320 E2K24CLNS COMPUTER 2 PRINTER EPSON LQ-300+ DCGY054147 FCC DoC Approved 3 MODEM ACEEX 1414V/3 0401008269 IFAXDM1414 NO. SIGNAL CABLE DESCRIPTION OF THE ABOVE SUPPORT UNITS 1 NA 2 1.2 m shielded cable without core 3 1.2 m shielded cable without core NOTE: All power cords of the above support units are non shielded (1.8m). Report No.: RF990707C24 8 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4. TEST TYPES AND RESULTS 4.1 RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT 4.1.1 LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT Emissions radiated outside of the specified bands, shall be according to the general radiated limits in 15.209, 15.249 as following: 15.209 Limit Frequencies Field strength Measurement distance (MHz) (microvolts/meter) (meters) 0.009 ~ 0.490 2400/F(kHz) 300 0.490 ~ 1.705 24000/F(kHz) 30 1.705 ~ 30.0 30 30 30 ~ 88 100 3 88 ~ 216 150 3 216 ~ 960 200 3 Above 960 500 3 15.249 Limit Field Strength of Field Strength of Fundamental Fundamental Harmonics Frequency (millivolts/meter) (microvolts/meter) 902 ~ 928 MHz 50 500 2400 ~ 2483.5 MHz 50 500 5725 ~ 5875 MHz 50 500 24 ~ 24.25 GHz 250 2500 NOTE: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. 2. Emission level (dBuV/m) = 20 log Emission level (uV/m). 3. As shown in 15.35(b), for frequencies above 1000MHz, the field strength limits are based on average detector, however, the peak field strength of any emission shall not exceed the maximum permitted average limits, specified above by more than 20dB under any condition of modulation. Report No.: RF990707C24 9 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS DESCRIPTION & DATE OF DUE DATE OF MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER CALIBRATION CALIBRATION Test Receiver ESIB7 100188 Dec. 21, 2009 Dec. 20, 2010 ROHDE & SCHWARZ Spectrum Analyzer FSP40 100041 Jul. 09, 2010 Jul. 08, 2011 ROHDE & SCHWARZ BILOG Antenna VULB9168 9168-156 Apr. 30, 2010 Apr. 29, 2011 SCHWARZBECK HORN Antenna BBHA 9120 D 9120D-563 Aug. 10, 2009 Aug. 09, 2010 SCHWARZBECK HORN Antenna BBHA 9170 BBHA9170242 Dec. 25, 2009 Dec. 24, 2010 SCHWARZBECK Preamplifier 8449B 3008A01910 Sep. 11, 2009 Sep. 10, 2010 Agilent Preamplifier 8447D 2944A10638 Dec. 21, 2009 Dec. 20, 2010 Agilent RF signal cable 218190/4 SUCOFLEX 104 May 14, 2010 May 13, 2011 HUBER+SUHNNER 231241/4 RF signal cable 8D-FB Cable-HYCH9-01 Aug. 17, 2009 Aug. 16, 2010 Worken ADT_Radiated_ Software NA NA NA V7.6.15.9.2 Antenna Tower 2070/2080 512.835.4684 NA NA EMCO Turn Table 2087-2.03 NA NA NA EMCO Antenna Tower &Turn Table 2090 NA NA NA Controller EMCO NOTE: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in HwaYa Chamber 9. 3. The horn antenna and HP preamplifier (model: 8449B) are used only for the measurement of emission frequency above 1GHz if tested. 4. The FCC Site Registration No. is 460141. 5. The IC Site Registration No. is IC 7450F-4. Report No.: RF990707C24 10 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters above the ground at a 3 meter semi-anechoic chamber. The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. b. The EUT was set 3 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower. c. The antenna is a broadband antenna, and its height is varied from one meter to four meters above the ground to determine the maximum value of the field strength. Both horizontal and vertical polarizations of the antenna are set to make the measurement. d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and then the antenna was tuned to heights from 1 meter to 4 meters and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading. e. The test-receiver system was set to Peak Detect Function and Specified Bandwidth with Maximum Hold Mode. f. If the emission level of the EUT in peak mode was lower than the limit specified, then testing could be stopped and the peak values of the EUT would be reported. Otherwise the emissions would be re-tested one by one using peak, quasi-peak or average method as specified and then reported in a data sheet. NOTE: 1. The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 120kHz for Quasi-peak detection at frequency below 1GHz. 2. The resolution bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 1MHz and video bandwidth is 3MHz for Peak detection at frequency above 1GHz. 3. All modes of operation were investigated and the worst-case emissions are reported. 4.1.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD No deviation. Report No.: RF990707C24 11 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.1.5 TEST SETUP For the actual test configuration, please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). 4.1.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS a. Plugged the EUT to notebook and placed on a testing table. b. Set the transmitter part of EUT under receiving condition continuously at specific channel frequency. c. The necessary accessories enable the EUT in full functions. Report No.: RF990707C24 12 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.1.7 TEST RESULTS EUT TEST CONDITION MEASUREMENT DETAIL CHANNEL Channel 1 FREQUENCY RANGE Below 1000MHz INPUT POWER DETECTOR 120Vac, 60 Hz Quasi-Peak (SYSTEM) FUNCTION ENVIRONMENTAL 24deg. C, 63%RH TESTED BY Kevin Liang CONDITIONS 1020 hPa ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION TABLE CORRECTION LIMIT ANTENNA RAW VALUE NO. FREQ. (MHz) LEVEL MARGIN (dB) ANGLE FACTOR (dBuV/m) HEIGHT (m) (dBuV) (dBuV/m) (Degree) (dB/m) 1 *908.40 97.5 PK 114.0 -16.5 1.48 H 335 71.3 26.2 2 *908.40 91.3 AV 94.0 -2.7 1.48 H 335 65.1 26.2 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION TABLE CORRECTION LIMIT ANTENNA RAW VALUE NO. FREQ. (MHz) LEVEL MARGIN (dB) ANGLE FACTOR (dBuV/m) HEIGHT (m) (dBuV) (dBuV/m) (Degree) (dB/m) 1 *908.40 93.2 PK 114.0 -20.8 1.65 V 38 67.0 26.2 2 *908.40 87.0 AV 94.0 -7.0 1.65 V 38 60.8 26.2 REMARKS: 1. Emission level (dBuV/m) = Raw Value (dBuV) + Correction Factor (dB/m). 2. Correction Factor (dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB). 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value. 5. “ * “ : Fundamental frequency 6. The average value of fundamental frequency is: Average = Peak value + 20log(Duty cycle) Where the duty factor is calculated from following formula: 20 log (Duty cycle) = 20 log (49 ms / 100 ms) = -6.2 dB Please see page 16 for plotted duty. Report No.: RF990707C24 13 Report Format Version 3.0.1

ABOVE 1GHz DATA EUT TEST CONDITION MEASUREMENT DETAIL CHANNEL Channel 1 FREQUENCY RANGE 1 ~ 25GHz INPUT POWER DETECTOR Peak (PK) 120Vac, 60 Hz (SYSTEM) FUNCTION Average (AV) ENVIRONMENTAL 24deg. C, 63%RH TESTED BY Kevin Liang CONDITIONS 1020 hPa ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION TABLE CORRECTION LIMIT ANTENNA RAW VALUE NO. FREQ. (MHz) LEVEL MARGIN (dB) ANGLE FACTOR (dBuV/m) HEIGHT (m) (dBuV) (dBuV/m) (Degree) (dB/m) 1 1816.80 58.9 PK 74.0 -15.1 1.00 H 20 28.60 30.30 2 1816.80 52.7 AV 54.0 -1.3 1.00 H 20 22.40 30.30 3 2725.20 59.1 PK 74.0 -14.9 1.00 H 22 25.60 33.50 4 2725.20 52.9 AV 54.0 -1.1 1.00 H 22 19.40 33.50 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION TABLE CORRECTION LIMIT ANTENNA RAW VALUE NO. FREQ. (MHz) LEVEL MARGIN (dB) ANGLE FACTOR (dBuV/m) HEIGHT (m) (dBuV) (dBuV/m) (Degree) (dB/m) 1 1816.80 53.7 PK 74.0 -20.3 1.03 V 58 23.40 30.30 2 1816.80 47.5 AV 54.0 -6.5 1.03 V 58 17.20 30.30 3 2725.20 52.1 PK 74.0 -21.9 1.02 V 54 18.60 33.50 4 2725.20 45.9 AV 54.0 -8.1 1.02 V 54 12.40 33.50 REMARKS: 1. Emission level (dBuV/m) = Raw Value (dBuV) + Correction Factor (dB/m). 2. Correction Factor (dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB). 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value. 5. The average value of fundamental frequency is: Average = Peak value + 20log(Duty cycle) Where the duty factor is calculated from following formula: 20 log (Duty cycle) = 20 log (49 ms / 100 ms) = -6.2 dB Please see page 16 for plotted duty. Report No.: RF990707C24 14 Report Format Version 3.0.1

BELOW 1GHz WORST-CASE DATA EUT TEST CONDITION MEASUREMENT DETAIL CHANNEL Channel 1 FREQUENCY RANGE Below 1000MHz INPUT POWER DETECTOR 120Vac, 60 Hz Quasi-Peak (SYSTEM) FUNCTION ENVIRONMENTAL 24deg. C, 63%RH TESTED BY Kevin Liang CONDITIONS 1020 hPa ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION TABLE CORRECTION LIMIT ANTENNA RAW VALUE NO. FREQ. (MHz) LEVEL MARGIN (dB) ANGLE FACTOR (dBuV/m) HEIGHT (m) (dBuV) (dBuV/m) (Degree) (dB/m) 1 115.45 28.2 QP 43.5 -15.3 1.50 H 322 17.01 11.20 2 216.55 35.0 QP 46.0 -11.0 1.25 H 259 23.65 11.34 3 333.21 28.0 QP 46.0 -18.0 1.00 H 301 13.56 14.46 4 416.81 28.5 QP 46.0 -17.5 1.00 H 301 11.85 16.62 5 626.80 32.0 QP 46.0 -14.0 1.25 H 85 9.83 22.13 6 770.67 33.3 QP 46.0 -12.7 1.00 H 334 8.74 24.52 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION TABLE CORRECTION LIMIT ANTENNA RAW VALUE NO. FREQ. (MHz) LEVEL MARGIN (dB) ANGLE FACTOR (dBuV/m) HEIGHT (m) (dBuV) (dBuV/m) (Degree) (dB/m) 1 33.79 29.6 QP 40.0 -10.4 1.00 V 43 17.46 12.16 2 117.39 29.7 QP 43.5 -13.8 1.25 V 160 18.28 11.44 3 216.55 30.4 QP 46.0 -15.6 1.50 V 199 19.10 11.34 4 467.36 29.1 QP 46.0 -17.0 1.50 V 166 10.80 18.25 5 597.63 28.9 QP 46.0 -17.1 1.00 V 10 7.08 21.86 6 770.67 31.0 QP 46.0 -15.0 2.00 V 67 6.44 24.52 REMARKS: 1. Emission level (dBuV/m) = Raw Value (dBuV) + Correction Factor (dB/m). 2. Correction Factor (dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB). 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value. Report No.: RF990707C24 15 Report Format Version 3.0.1

Report No.: RF990707C24 16 Report Format Version 3.0.1

20 log (Duty cycle) = 20 log [(21.6 + 5 + 22.4) ms / 100 ms] = -6.2dB Report No.: RF990707C24 17 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.2 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT 4.2.1 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT FREQUENCY OF EMISSION (MHz) CONDUCTED LIMIT (dBµV) Quasi-peak Average 0.15-0.5 66 to 56 56 to 46 0.5-5 56 46 5-30 60 50 NOTE: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. 2. The limit decreases in line with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 to 0.50 MHz. 3. All emanations from a class A/B digital device or system, including any network of conductors and apparatus connected thereto, shall not exceed the level of field strengths specified above. 4.2.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS DESCRIPTION & DATE OF DUE DATE OF MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER CALIBRATION CALIBRATION Test Receiver ESCS30 100291 Dec. 16, 2009 Dec. 15, 2010 ROHDE & SCHWARZ RF signal cable 5D-FB Cable-HYC01-01 Nov. 12, 2009 Nov. 11, 2010 Woken LISN NNBL 8226-2 8226-142 Jun. 12, 2010 Jun. 12, 2011 SCHWARZBECK LISN ESH3-Z5 835239/001 Feb., 10, 2010 Feb. 09, 2011 ROHDE & SCHWARZ Software ADT_Cond_ NA NA NA ADT V7.3.7 NOTE: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in HwaYa Shielded Room 1. 3. The VCCI Site Registration No. is C-2040. Report No.: RF990707C24 18 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.2.3 TEST PROCEDURES a. The EUT was placed 0.4 meters from the conducting wall of the shielded room with EUT being connected to the power mains through a line impedance stabilization network (LISN). Other support units were connected to the power mains through another LISN. The two LISNs provide 50 ohm/ 50uH of coupling impedance for the measuring instrument. b. Both lines of the power mains connected to the EUT were checked for maximum conducted interference. c. The frequency range from 150kHz to 30MHz was searched. Emission levels under (Limit - 20dB) was not recorded. NOTE: All modes of operation were investigated and the worst-case emissions are reported. 4.2.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD No deviation. Report No.: RF990707C24 19 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.2.5 TEST SETUP V e r tic a l G r o u n d R e fe r e n c e P la n e Te s t R e c e iv e r EUT 40cm 80cm L IS N H o r iz o n ta l G r o u n d R e fe r e n c e P la n e N o te : 1 .S u p p o r t u n its w e r e c o n n e c te d to s e c o n d L IS N . 2 .B o th o f L IS N s ( A M N ) a r e 8 0 c m fr o m E U T a n d a t le a s t 8 0 fr o m o th e r u n its a n d o th e r m e ta l p la n e s For the actual test configuration, please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). 4.2.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS Same as 4.1.6. Report No.: RF990707C24 20 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.2.7 TEST RESULTS CONDUCTED WORST-CASE DATA： PHASE Line 1 6dB BANDWIDTH 9kHz Emission Freq. Corr. Reading Value Limit Margin Level No Factor [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] (dB) [MHz] (dB) Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. 1 0.150 0.12 51.28 - 51.40 - 66.00 56.00 -14.60 - 2 0.182 0.11 55.88 46.34 55.99 46.45 64.37 54.37 -8.38 -7.92 3 0.252 0.12 51.20 - 51.32 - 61.71 51.71 -10.39 - 4 0.306 0.12 48.06 - 48.18 - 60.07 50.07 -11.89 - 5 0.377 0.13 46.32 - 46.45 - 58.35 48.35 -11.91 - 6 0.439 0.13 44.21 - 44.34 - 57.08 47.08 -12.74 - 7 0.564 0.14 42.57 - 42.71 - 56.00 46.00 -13.29 - 8 12.719 0.87 37.00 - 37.87 - 60.00 50.00 -22.13 - 9 15.215 1.07 44.14 - 45.21 - 60.00 50.00 -14.79 - REMARKS: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually. 2. "-": The Quasi-peak reading value also meets average limit and measurement with the average detector is unnecessary. 3. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level - Limit value 5. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 6. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value. Report No.: RF990707C24 21 Report Format Version 3.0.1

PHASE Line 2 6dB BANDWIDTH 9kHz Emission Freq. Corr. Reading Value Limit Margin Level No Factor [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] [dB (uV)] (dB) [MHz] (dB) Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. 1 0.150 0.10 52.00 - 52.10 - 66.00 56.00 -13.90 - 2 0.181 0.10 54.80 43.42 54.90 43.52 64.43 54.43 -9.53 -10.91 3 0.245 0.10 51.99 40.58 52.09 40.68 61.93 51.93 -9.83 -11.24 4 0.314 0.11 47.34 - 47.45 - 59.86 49.86 -12.41 - 5 0.364 0.12 43.91 - 44.03 - 58.64 48.64 -14.61 - 6 0.439 0.12 43.80 - 43.92 - 57.08 47.08 -13.16 - 7 2.871 0.27 37.64 - 37.91 - 56.00 46.00 -18.09 - 8 4.707 0.35 38.84 - 39.19 - 56.00 46.00 -16.81 - REMARKS: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually. 2. "-": The Quasi-peak reading value also meets average limit and measurement with the average detector is unnecessary. 3. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level - Limit value 5. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 6. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value. Report No.: RF990707C24 22 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.3 BAND EDGES MEASUREMENT 4.3.1 LIMITS OF BAND EDGES MEASUREMENT Below –50dB of the highest emission level of operating band (in 100kHz Resolution Bandwidth). 4.3.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS DESCRIPTION & DATE OF DUE DATE OF MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER CALIBRATION CALIBRATION SPECTRUM ANALYZER FSP40 100040 Jul. 09, 2010 Jul. 08, 2011 R&S NOTE: The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 4.3.3 TEST PROCEDURE The transmitter output was connected to the spectrum analyzer via a low lose cable. Set both RBW and VBW of spectrum analyzer to 100 kHz and 300 kHz with suitable frequency span including 100 MHz bandwidth from band edge. The band edges was measured and recorded. The spectrum plots are attached on the following pages. 4.3.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD No deviation. 4.3.5 EUT OPERATING CONDITION The software provided by client to enable the EUT under transmission condition continuously at lowest and highest channel frequencies individually. Report No.: RF990707C24 23 Report Format Version 3.0.1

4.3.6 TEST RESULTS The spectrum plots are attached on the following images. D1 line indicates the highest level, and D2 line indicates the 50dB offset below D1. It shows compliance with the requirement in part 15.249 (d). Report No.: RF990707C24 24 Report Format Version 3.0.1

5. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION Please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). Report No.: RF990707C24 25 Report Format Version 3.0.1

6. INFORMATION ON THE TESTING LABORATORIES We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited and approved according to ISO/IEC 17025. Copies of accreditation certificates of our laboratories obtained from approval agencies can be downloaded from our web site: www.adt.com.tw/index.5/phtml. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following: Linko EMC/RF Lab Hsin Chu EMC/RF Lab Tel: 886-2-26052180 Tel: 886-3-5935343 Fax: 886-2-26051924 Fax: 886-3-5935342 Hwa Ya EMC/RF/Safety/Telecom Lab Tel: 886-3-3183232 Fax: 886-3-3185050 Web Site: www.adt.com.tw The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also. Report No.: RF990707C24 26 Report Format Version 3.0.1

7. APPENDIX A - MODIFICATIONS RECORDERS FOR ENGINEERING CHANGES TO THE EUT BY THE LAB No any modifications are made to the EUT by the lab during the test. --- END --- Report No.: RF990707C24 27 Report Format Version 3.0.1


Document Created: 2010-07-30 15:43:06
Document Modified: 2010-07-30 15:43:06
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC