Part 22 24 EIRP Test Report

FCC ID: JUP-WCDCM300C

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_1411577

TEST REPORT FROM RFI GLOBAL SERVICES LTD Test of: Torch (EVDO Rev A) DCM300C FCC ID: JUP-WCDCM300C To: FCC Part 22.913 & Part 24.232 Test Report Serial No: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 Version 2.0 Supersedes All Previous Versions This Test Report Is Issued Under The Authority Of Chris Guy, Head of Global Approvals: Checked By: A. Henriques Signature: Date of Issue: 12 January 2011 This report is issued in Adobe Acrobat portable document format (PDF). It is only a valid copy of the report if it is being viewed in PDF format with the following security options not allowed: Changing the document, Selecting text and graphics, Adding or changing notes and form fields. This report may not be reproduced other than in full, except with the prior written approval of RFI Global Services Ltd. The results in this report apply only to the sample(s) tested.

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 VERSION 2.0 ISSUE DATE: 12 JANUARY 2011 This page has been left intentionally blank. Page 2 of 15 RFI Global Services Ltd

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 VERSION 2.0 ISSUE DATE: 12 JANUARY 2011 Table of Contents 1. Customer Information .................................................................................................................. 4 2. Summary of Testing ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. General Information 5 2.2. Summary of Test Results 5 2.3. Methods and Procedures 5 2.4. Deviations from the Test Specification 5 3. Equipment Under Test (EUT) ....................................................................................................... 6 3.1. Identification of Equipment Under Test (EUT) 6 3.2. Description of EUT 6 3.3. Modifications Incorporated in the EUT 6 3.4. Additional Information Related to Testing 7 3.5. Support Equipment 7 4. Operation and Monitoring of the EUT during Testing ............................................................... 8 4.1. Operating Modes 8 4.2. Configuration and Peripherals 8 5. Measurements, Examinations and Derived Results .................................................................. 9 5.1. General Comments 9 5.2. Test Results – Part 22 10 5.2.1. Transmitter Output Power (ERP) 10 5.3. Test Results – Part 24 12 5.3.1. Transmitter Output Power (EIRP) 12 6. Measurement Uncertainty .......................................................................................................... 14 Appendix 1. Test Equipment Used ................................................................................................ 15 RFI Global Services Ltd Page 3 of 15

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 VERSION 2.0 ISSUE DATE: 12 JANUARY 2011 1. Customer Information Company Name: Trimble Navigation Ltd Address: 10355 Westmoor Dr Westminster Colo 80021 United States Page 4 of 15 RFI Global Services Ltd

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 VERSION 2.0 ISSUE DATE: 12 JANUARY 2011 2. Summary of Testing 2.1. General Information Specification Reference: 47CFR22 Specification Title: Code of Federal Regulations Volume 47 (Telecommunications) 2010: Part 22 Subpart H (Public Mobile Services) - Section 22.913 Specification Reference: 47CFR24 Specification Title: Code of Federal Regulations Volume 47 (Telecommunications) 2010: Part 24 Subpart E (Personal Communication Services) - Section 24.232 Site Registration: FCC: 209735 Location of Testing: RFI Global Services Ltd, Wade Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 8AH Test Dates: 13 December 2010 2.2. Summary of Test Results FCC Reference (47CFR) Measurement Result Part 22 Part 22.913(a) Transmitter Output Power (ERP) Part 24 Part 24.232 Transmitter Output Power (EIRP) Key to Results = Complied = Did not comply 2.3. Methods and Procedures Reference: ANSI/TIA-603-C-2004 Title: Land Mobile Communications Equipment, Measurements and performance Standards 2.4. Deviations from the Test Specification For the measurements contained within this test report, there were no deviations from, additions to, or exclusions from the test specification identified above. RFI Global Services Ltd Page 5 of 15

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 VERSION 2.0 ISSUE DATE: 12 JANUARY 2011 3. Equipment Under Test (EUT) 3.1. Identification of Equipment Under Test (EUT) Product Name: Trimble Navigation DCM300C Model Number: Torch / DCM300C Serial Number: 5042Z00083 Hardware Version Number: A Software Version Number: 0.1.5 FCC ID: JUP-WCDCM300C 3.2. Description of EUT The equipment under test was a data communications module (DCM) for use in construction vehicles. It contains a Sierra Wireless CDMA module (FCC ID: N7N-MC5728) capable of 1xEV-DO and a Wi2Wi Wi-Fi module (FCC ID: U9R-W2CBW009DI) capable of 802.11b and 802.11g. The following antennas have been specified for use with the EUT: • Taoglas MA.104 “Hercules” Antenna, part number MA.104.C.A301111.B301311, declared antenna gain 0 dBi • Pulse IP67 Active 6 bands GPS Antenna, part number W4120GW5000, declared antenna gain 0 dBi • Wilson NMO Cellular Antenna /20 feet LMR-240 RF coaxial cable combination consisting of: Wilson NMO Cellular Antenna, part number 301104, declared antenna gain 4.9 dBi in the 800 MHz band and 5.9 dBi in the 1900 MHz band and 20 feet of type LMR-240 cable, part number GBR-20-240-T1-A. 3.3. Modifications Incorporated in the EUT No modifications were applied to the EUT during testing. Page 6 of 15 RFI Global Services Ltd

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 VERSION 2.0 ISSUE DATE: 12 JANUARY 2011 3.4. Additional Information Related to Testing Type of Radio Device: Transceiver Mode: 1xEV-DO Modulation Type: QPSK, 8-PSK and 16-QAM Power Supply Requirement(s): Nominal 13.8 V Technology Tested: US Cellular (800 band) Maximum Output Power (ERP): 1xEV-DO 27.25 dBm Transmit Channels Tested: Channel Channel ID Channel Number Frequency (MHz) Bottom 1013 824 Middle 384 836 Top 777 848 Technology Tested: US PCS (1900 band) Maximum Output Power (EIRP): 1xEV-DO 28.3 dBm Transmit Channels Tested: Channel Channel ID Channel Number Frequency (MHz) Bottom 25 1851 Middle 600 1880 Top 1175 1901 3.5. Support Equipment The following support equipment was used to exercise the EUT during testing: Description: Laptop Brand Name: Dell Model Name or Number: Latitude D610 Serial Number: RFI Asset Number PC 344NT RFI Global Services Ltd Page 7 of 15

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 VERSION 2.0 ISSUE DATE: 12 JANUARY 2011 4. Operation and Monitoring of the EUT during Testing 4.1. Operating Modes The EUT was tested in the following operating mode(s): • Constantly transmitting at full power on bottom, middle and top channels as required. 4.2. Configuration and Peripherals The EUT was tested in the following configuration(s): • The sample with serial number 50242Z00083 was used for conducted power measurements. • The EUT was placed into test mode via HyperTerminal, using instruction set as supplied by the customer. This then enabled the EUT to be set to transmit at full power on bottom, middle and top channels. Page 8 of 15 RFI Global Services Ltd

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 VERSION 2.0 ISSUE DATE: 12 JANUARY 2011 5. Measurements, Examinations and Derived Results 5.1. General Comments Measurement uncertainties are evaluated in accordance with current best practice. Our reported expanded uncertainties are based on standard uncertainties, which are multiplied by an appropriate coverage factor to provide a statistical confidence level of approximately 95%. RFI Global Services Ltd Page 9 of 15

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 VERSION 2.0 ISSUE DATE: 12 JANUARY 2011 5.2. Test Results – Part 22 5.2.1. Transmitter Output Power (ERP) Test Summary: Test Engineer: Steve White Test Date: 13 December 2010 Test Sample: 5042Z00083 FCC Part: 22.913(a) & 2.1046(a) Test Method Used: As detailed in ANSI TIA-603-C-2004 Section 2.2.1 referencing FCC CFR Part 2.1046(a) Environmental Conditions: Temperature (°C): 21 Relative Humidity (%): 29 Results - 0 dBi gain Antenna Types: Channel Frequency Conducted Declared ERP ERP Limit Margin Result (MHz) Power Antenna (dBm) (dBm) (dB) (dBm) Gain (dB) Bottom 824 29.4 -2.15 27.25 38.45 11.2 Complied Middle 836 28.9 -2.15 26.75 38.45 11.7 Complied Top 848 28.6 -2.15 26.45 38.45 12.0 Complied Note(s): 1. The declared antenna gain for the antennas specified for use with the EUT (i.e. Taoglas MA.104 “Hercules” Antenna, part number MA.104.C.A301111.B301311 and Pulse IP67 Active 6 bands GPS Antenna, part number W4120GW5000) is stated as nominal 0 dBi which equates to -2.15 dBd. This was calculated using the specified dBi to dBd conversion (dBd = dBi -2.15) as the limit is stated as an ERP value. 2. The declared antenna gain in dBd was added to the conducted output power in order to calculate the final ERP figure. Page 10 of 15 RFI Global Services Ltd

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 VERSION 2.0 ISSUE DATE: 12 JANUARY 2011 Transmitter Output Power (ERP) (continued) Results – Wilson NMO Cellular Antenna: Channel Frequency Conducted Declared Cable ERP ERP Margin Result (MHz) Power Antenna Loss (dBm) Limit (dB) (dBm) Gain (dB) (dBm) (dB) Bottom 824 29.4 2.75 1.4 30.75 38.45 7.7 Complied Middle 836 28.9 2.75 1.4 30.25 38.45 8.2 Complied Top 848 28.6 2.75 1.4 29.95 38.45 8.5 Complied Note(s): 1. The declared antenna gain for the Wilson NMO Cellular Antenna, part number 301104, is stated as nominal 4.9 dBi which equates to 2.75 dBd. This was calculated using the specified dBi to dBd conversion (dBd = dBi -2.15) as the limit is stated as an ERP value. 2. The combined declared antenna gain in dBd and cable loss in dB was added to the conducted output power in order to calculate the final ERP figure. 3. The RF coaxial cable (part number GBR-20-240-T1-A) specified for use with the Wilson NMO Cellular Antenna is a 20 feet length type LMR-240 cable which has a minimum loss of 1.4 dB in the 800 MHz cellular band. RFI Global Services Ltd Page 11 of 15

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 VERSION 2.0 ISSUE DATE: 12 JANUARY 2011 5.3. Test Results – Part 24 5.3.1. Transmitter Output Power (EIRP) Test Summary: Test Engineer: Steve White Test Date: 13 December 2010 Test Sample: 5042Z00083 FCC Part: 24.232 & 2.1046(a) Test Method Used: As detailed in ANSI TIA-603-C-2004 Section 2.2.1 referencing FCC CFR Part 2.1046(a) Environmental Conditions: Temperature (°C): 21 Relative Humidity (%): 29 Results - 0 dBi gain Antenna Types: Channel Frequency Conducted Declared EIRP EIRP Limit Margin Result (MHz) Power Antenna (dBm) (dBm) (dB) (dBm) Gain (dBi) Bottom 1851 28.0 0.0 28.0 33.0 5.0 Complied Middle 1880 28.2 0.0 28.2 33.0 4.8 Complied Top 1901 28.3 0.0 28.3 33.0 4.7 Complied Note(s): 1. The declared antenna gain for the antennas specified for use with the EUT (i.e. Taoglas MA.104 “Hercules” Antenna, part number MA.104.C.A301111.B301311 and Pulse IP67 Active 6 bands GPS Antenna, part number W4120GW5000) is stated as nominal 0 dBi 2. The declared antenna gain was added to the conducted output power in order to calculate the final EIRP figure. Page 12 of 15 RFI Global Services Ltd

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 VERSION 2.0 ISSUE DATE: 12 JANUARY 2011 Transmitter Output Power (EIRP) (continued) Results – Wilson NMO Cellular Antenna: Channel Frequency Conducted Declared Cable EIRP EIRP Margin Result (MHz) Power Antenna Loss (dBm) Limit (dB) (dBm) Gain (dB) (dBm) (dBi) Bottom 1851 28.0 5.9 2.2 31.7 33.0 1.3 Complied Middle 1880 28.2 5.9 2.2 31.9 33.0 1.1 Complied Top 1901 28.3 5.9 2.2 32.0 33.0 1.0 Complied Note(s): 1. The declared antenna gain for the Wilson NMO Cellular Antenna, part number 301104, is stated as nominal 5.9 dBi. 2. The combined declared antenna gain in dBi and cable loss in dB was added to the conducted output power in order to calculate the final EIRP figure. 3. The RF coaxial cable (part number GBR-20-240-T1-A) specified for use with the Wilson NMO Cellular Antenna is a 20 feet length type LMR-240 cable which has a minimum loss of 2.2 dB in the 1900 MHz PCS band. RFI Global Services Ltd Page 13 of 15

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 VERSION 2.0 ISSUE DATE: 12 JANUARY 2011 6. Measurement Uncertainty No measurement or test can ever be perfect and the imperfections give rise to error of measurement in the results. Consequently the result of a measurement is only an approximation to the value of the measurand (the specific quantity subject to measurement) and is only complete when accompanied by a statement of the uncertainty of the approximation. The expression of uncertainty of a measurement result allows realistic comparison of results with reference values and limits given in specifications and standards. The uncertainty of the result may need to be taken into account when interpreting the measurement results. The reported expanded uncertainties below are based on a standard uncertainty multiplied by an appropriate coverage factor such that a confidence level of approximately 95% is maintained. For the purposes of this document “approximately” is interpreted as meaning “effectively” or “for most practical purposes”. Confidence Calculated Measurement Type Range Level (%) Uncertainty Conducted Output Power 824 to 849 MHz & 1850 to 1910 MHz 95% ±0.27 dB The methods used to calculate the above uncertainties are in line with those recommended within the various measurement specifications. Where measurement specifications do not include guidelines for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty the published guidance of the appropriate accreditation body is followed. Page 14 of 15 RFI Global Services Ltd

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: RFI-RPT-RP79038JD03B V2.0 VERSION 2.0 ISSUE DATE: 12 JANUARY 2011 Appendix 1. Test Equipment Used RFI Instrument Manufacturer Type No. Serial No. Date Cal. No. Calibration Interval Due (mths) M1009 Power Meter Hewlett Packard 437B 3125U13706 26 Jan 2011 12 M1254 Preselector Mixer HP 11974U 3001A00152 08 Sep 2011 12 NB In accordance with UKAS requirements all the measurement equipment is on a calibration schedule. RFI Global Services Ltd Page 15 of 15


Document Created: 2011-01-12 11:35:22
Document Modified: 2011-01-12 11:35:22
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC