Part 18 Test report

FCC ID: JNZPR0001

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_3453916

FCC Certification Test Report Report No.: FC170615E07-1 Test Model: P-R0001 Received Date: June 15, 2017 Test Date: June 20 to 22, 2017 Issued Date: June 30, 2017 Applicant: LOGITECH FAR EAST LTD. Address: #2 Creation Rd. 4, Science-Based Ind. Park Hsinchu Taiwan, R.O.C. Issued By: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Hsin Chu Laboratory Lab Address: E-2, No.1, Li Hsin 1st Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu City 300, Taiwan R.O.C. Test Location (1): E-2, No.1, Li Hsin 1st Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu City 300, Taiwan R.O.C. Test Location (2): No. 49, Ln. 206, Wende Rd., Shangshan Tsuen, Chiung Lin Hsiang, Hsin Chu Hsien 307, Taiwan R.O.C. This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in this report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute your unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specific mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agencies. Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 1 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

Table of Contents Release Control Record .................................................................................................................................. 3 1 Certificate of Conformity ......................................................................................................................... 4 2 Summary of Test Results......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Measurement Uncertainty ................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Modification Record ............................................................................................................................ 5 3 General Information ................................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 Features of EUT .................................................................................................................................. 6 3.2 General Description of EUT ................................................................................................................ 6 3.3 Operating Modes of EUT and Determination of Worst Case Operating Mode ................................... 7 3.4 Test Program Used and Operation Descriptions ................................................................................. 7 3.5 Primary Clock Frequencies of Internal Source ................................................................................... 7 3.6 Miscellaneous ...................................................................................................................................... 8 4 Configuration and Connections with EUT ............................................................................................. 9 4.1 Connection Diagram of EUT and Peripheral Devices ......................................................................... 9 4.2 Configuration of Peripheral Devices and Cable Connections ........................................................... 10 5 Conducted Emissions at Mains Ports ................................................................................................... 11 5.1 Limits .................................................................................................................................................. 11 5.2 Test Instruments ................................................................................................................................. 11 5.3 Test Arrangement .............................................................................................................................. 12 5.4 Supplementary Information ............................................................................................................... 12 5.5 Test Results ....................................................................................................................................... 13 6 Field Strength ......................................................................................................................................... 15 6.1 Limits ................................................................................................................................................. 15 6.2 Test Instruments (below 30MHz) ....................................................................................................... 16 6.3 Test Arrangement (below 30MHz) ..................................................................................................... 17 6.4 Test Results ....................................................................................................................................... 18 6.5 Test Instruments (30MHz ~ 1000MHz) ............................................................................................. 20 6.6 Test Arrangement (30MHz ~ 1000MHz) ............................................................................................ 21 6.7 Test Results ....................................................................................................................................... 22 6.8 Test Instruments (above 1000MHz) .................................................................................................. 24 6.9 Test Arrangement (above 1000MHz) ................................................................................................ 25 6.10 Supplementary Information ........................................................................................................... 25 6.11 Test Results ................................................................................................................................... 26 7 Pictures of Test Arrangements ............................................................................................................. 28 Appendix – Information on the Testing Laboratories ................................................................................ 29 Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 2 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

Release Control Record Issue No. Description Date Issued FC170615E07-1 Original release. June 30, 2017 Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 3 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

1 Certificate of Conformity Product: Mouse Pad Brand: Logitech Test Model: P-R0001 Sample Status: ENGINEERING SAMPLE Applicant: LOGITECH FAR EAST LTD. Test Date: June 20 to 22, 2017 Standards: FCC Part 18, Subpart C FCC/OST MP-5: 1986 The above equipment has been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the sample’s EMC characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. Prepared by : , Date: June 30, 2017 Cindy Hsin / Specialist Approved by : , Date: June 30, 2017 Ken Lu / Manager Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 4 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

nE veRitas 2 Summary of Test Results Standard Test Type Result Remarks Minimum passing margin is Conducted Test PASS —4.67 dB at 20.33984 MHz FCC Part 18, Subpart C Field Strength Pass Minimum passing margin is Measurement ~4.40 dB at 13.5604 MHz Note: 1.There is no deviation to the applied test methods and requirements covered by the scope of this report. 2.1 Measurement Uncertainty Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for tests performed on the EUT as specified in CISPR 16—4—2: This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2. Expanded Uncertainty Measurement Frequency (k=2) (©) Conducted Emissions at mains ports 150kHz ~ 3O0MHz 1.84 dB Radiated Emissions up to 1 GHz 30MHz ~ 1GHz 5.31 dB 1GHz ~6GHz 5.12 dB Radiated Emissions above 1 GHz 6GHz ~18GHz 4.80 dB 18GHz ~ 40GHz 5.52 dB 2.2 Modification Record There were no modifications required for compliance. Report No. :FC170615E07—1 Page No. 5/ 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

3 General Information 3.1 Features of EUT The tests reported herein were performed according to the method specified by LOGITECH FAR EAST LTD., for detailed feature description, please refer to the manufacturer's specifications or user's manual. 3.2 General Description of EUT Product Mouse Pad Brand Logitech Test Model P-R0001 Sample Status ENGINEERING SAMPLE Operating Software NA Power Supply Rating DC 5V from USB interface Antenna Type Loop printed antenna (Antenna gain: 1.6 dBi) Accessory Device NA Data Cable Supplied NA Note: 1. The EUT may have a lot of colors for marketing requirement. 2. The above EUT information is declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description, please refer to the manufacturer's specifications or user's manual. Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 6 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

3.3 Operating Modes of EUT and Determination of Worst Case Operating Mode Test mode is presented in the report as below. Mode Test Condition 1 Normal Operation 3.4 Test Program Used and Operation Descriptions 1. Turn on the power of all equipment. 2. The EUT links support unit E (Charging Coin Adapter) via BLE. 3. The EUT supplies power to the support unit E (Charging Coin Adapter) via wireless. 4. The EUT links support unit D (Mouse) via GSFK. 5. Support unit A (Laptop) runs” EMC test.exe” then sends "H" messages to itself. 3.5 Primary Clock Frequencies of Internal Source The EUT is provided by LOGITECH FAR EAST LTD., for detailed internal source, please refer to the manufacturer's specifications. Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 7 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

3.6 Miscellaneous Labelling Requirements for Part 18 Devices:  Verification The specific labelling requirements for a device subject to the Verification procedure are contained in Section 15.19(a). These labelling requirements are: If the device is subject only to Verification, include a label bearing a unique identifier (Section 2.954) and one of three compliance statements specified in Section 15.19(a). If the labeling area for the device is so small, and/or it is not practical to place the compliance statement on the device, then the statement can be placed in the user manual or product packaging (Section 15.19(a)(5)). However, the device must still be labelled with the unique identifier (Verification). Generally, devices smaller than the palm of the hand are considered too small for the compliance statement.  Certification If the device is subject to Certification: (1) Section 2.925 contains information on identification of the equipment; (2) include a label bearing an FCC Identifier (FCC ID) (Section 2.926) and (3) include the appropriate compliance statement in Section 15.19(a). If the device is considered too small and therefore it is impractical (smaller than the palm of the hand) to display the compliance statement, then the statement may be placed in the user manual or product packaging. However, the device must still be labelled with the FCC ID. If the device is unquestionably too small for the FCC ID to be readable (smaller than 4-6 points), the FCC ID may be placed in the user manual. However, it must be determined that the device itself is too small – the label area allocated to the FCC ID may not be reduced because of over crowded identification of other product and regulatory information. An electronic display of the FCC ID (see 9. Electronic Labelling below) may be used for Certification of Section 15.212 modular transmitters and software defined radios (Section 2.944).  Declaration of Conformity (DoC): The labelling requirements for a device subject to the DoC procedure are specified in Section 15.19(b). The label should include the FCC logo along with the Trade Name and Model Number, which satisfies the unique identifier requirement of Section 2.1074 if it represents the identical equipment tested for DoC compliance. For personal computers assembled from authorized components, the following additional text must also be included: “Assembled from tested components,” “Complete system not tested.” When the device is so small and/or when it is not practical to place the required additional text on the device, the text may be placed in the user manual or pamphlet supplied to the user. However, the FCC logo, Trade Name, and Model Number must still be displayed on the device (Section 15.19(b)(3)). Part 15 Declaration of Conformity (DoC) Label Examples Equipment certified as software defined radio may use a means that readily displays the FCC ID on an electronic display screen, instead of labelling the device (Section 2.925 (e)). Further information may refer to FCC KDB:784748 D01 Labelling Part 15 &18 Guidelines * Insert either “A” or “B” but not both to identify the applicable Class of ITE. Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 8 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

4 Configuration and Connections with EUT 4.1 Connection Diagram of EUT and Peripheral Devices BLE + GFSK + wireless (E)Charging Coin Adapter (D)Mouse EUT Micro USB (1) (2) (B)i-pod (A)Laptop (3) (C)Printer Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 9 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

4.2 Configuration of Peripheral Devices and Cable Connections ID Product Brand Model No. Serial No. FCC ID Remarks A Laptop DELL E6230 NA NA Supplied by client B i-pod Apple MC749TA/A CC4DMFJUDFDM NA Provided by Lab C Printer EPSON LQ-300+II G88Y074083 FCC DoC Provided by Lab D Mouse Logitech G703 NA NA Supplied by client E Mouse Pad Logitech P-R0002 NA NA Supplied by client 1. All power cords of the above support units are non-shielded (1.8m). ID Descriptions Qty. Length (m) Shielding (Yes/No) Cores (Qty.) Remarks USB to Micro USB 1 1 1.8 Yes 1 Supplied by client Cable 2 USB Cable 1 1.8 Yes 0 Provided by Lab 3 USB Cable 1 0.1 Yes 0 Provided by Lab Note: The cores is originally attached to the cables. Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 10 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

5 Conducted Emissions at Mains Ports 5.1 Limits ALL OTHER PART 18 CONSUMER DEVICES Conducted limit Frequency Measured with a 50uH/50ohm LISN (MHz) Quasi-Peak (dBuV) Average (dBuV) 0.15 ~ 0.5 66 ~ 56* 56 ~ 46* 0.5 ~ 5 56 46 5 ~ 30 60 50 Notes: * Decreases with the logarithm of the frequency 5.2 Test Instruments DESCRIPTION & CALIBRATED CALIBRATED MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER DATE UNTIL Test Receiver ESCS 30 100375 May. 09, 2017 May. 08, 2018 R&S Line-Impedance Stabilization Network NSLK-8127 8127-522 Aug. 31, 2016 Aug. 30, 2017 (for EUT) SCHWARZBECK Line-Impedance Stabilization Network ENV216 100072 June 03, 2017 June 02, 2018 (for Peripheral) R&S RF Cable 5D-FB COACAB-002 Mar. 03, 2017 Mar. 02, 2018 10 dB PAD HAT-10+ CONATT-003 Sep. 13, 2016 Sep. 12, 2017 Mini-Circuits 50 ohms Terminator N/A EMC-03 Sep. 29, 2016 Sep. 28, 2017 50 ohms Terminator N/A EMC-02 Sep. 29, 2016 Sep. 28, 2017 Software BVADT_Cond_ NA NA NA BVADT V7.3.7.4 Note: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments are 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in Shielded Room No. C. 3 The VCCI Con C Registration No. is C-3611. 4 Tested Date: June 20, 2017 Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 11 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

5.3 Test Arrangement a. The EUT was placed 0.4 meters from the conducting wall of the shielded room with EUT being connected to the power mains through a line impedance stabilization network (LISN). Other support units were connected to the power mains through another LISN. The two LISNs provide 50 Ohm/ 50uH of coupling impedance for the measuring instrument. b. Both lines of the power mains connected to the EUT were checked for maximum conducted interference. c. The test results of conducted emissions at mains ports are recorded of six worst margins for quasi-peak (mandatory) [and average (if necessary)] values against the limits at frequencies of interest unless the margin is 20 dB or greater. Note: The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver is 9kHz for quasi-peak detection (QP) and average detection (AV) at frequency 0.15MHz-30MHz. For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related Item – Photographs of the Test Configuration. 5.4 Supplementary Information There is not any deviation from the test standards for the test method. Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 12 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

@7 UBaire 5.5 Test Results D r Function . Frequency Range 150kHz ~ 3O0MHz &eFti‘(e;:oolutitu)nct ° SuasrPeak (QP) / Bandwidth verage (AV), 9kHz Input Power Environmental s (ssstem) 120Vac, 60Hz Gonditions 26°C, 73%RH Tested by Eagle Chen Test Mode Mode 1 Phase Of Power : Line (L) Frequency |Correction| Reading Value Emission Level Limit Margin No Factor (dBuV) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dB) (MHz) (dB) Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. 1 0.23594 10.12 2144 6.69 31.56 16.81 62.24 52.24 —30.68 —35.43 2 0.59141 10.22 13.36 4.29 23.58 14.51 56.00 46.00 —32.42 —31.49 3 3.43359 10.38 18.54 9.41 28.92 19.79 56.00 46.00 —27.08 —26.21 4* 6.78125 10.49 75.33 50.45 85.82 60.94 NA NA NA NA 5 10.18750 10.59 16.29 3.95 26.88 14.54 60.00 50.00 —33.12 —35.46 6* 13.55859 10.71 48.55 40.47 59.26 51.18 NA NA NA NA 7 20.33984 10.93 34.50 34.40 45.43 45.33 60.00 50.00 —14.57 —4.67 8 27.12109 11.12 29.00 28.66 40.12 39.78 60.00 50.00 —19.88 —10.22 *: The test No.4 and No.6 have no limit in ISM band. Remarks: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi—peak and average individually. 2. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 3. Margin value = Emission level — Limit value 4. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 5. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value aguy 100 — an— so— r0— oo — sa— an~ ao— r0— 10— x1 0P Value ®—, o‘s 10bo s0.00 mave Report No. :FC170615E07—1 Page No. 13 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

@7 UBaire Detector F_unction Quasi—Peak (QP) / Frequency Range 150kHz ~ 3O0MHz & Reso_lutlon Average (AV), OkHz Bandwidth " (s!‘;:t‘e"“’) & In Power 120Vac, 60Hz Conamone 2 Environmental |2ec. rswah s Tested by Eagle Chen Test Mode Mode 1 Phase Of Power : Neutral (N) Frequency |Correction| Reading Value Emission Level Limit Margin No Factor (dBuV) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dB) (MHz) (dB) Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. 1 0.23984 10.20 17.44 6.46 27.64 16.66 6210 §2.10 —34.46 —35.44 2 0.38828 10.27 16.01 13.38 26.28 23.65 5810 48.10 —31.82 —24.45 3 0.65000 10.30 11.44 2.97 21.74 13.27 56.00 46.00 —34.26 —32.73 4 1.57422 10.39 14.61 5.95 25.00 16.34 56.00 46.00 —31.00 —29.66 5 3.44922 10.47 19.41 9.56 29.88 20.03 56.00 46.00 —26.12 —25.97 6* 6.78125 10.55 75.37 50.47 85.92 61.02 NA NA NA NA 7* 13.55859 10.73 5249 23.51 63.22 34.24 NA NA NA NA 8 20.33984 10.95 24.18 24.04 35.13 34.99 60.00 50.00 —24.87 —15.01 9 27.12109 11.05 27.76 27.42 38.81 38.47 60.00 50.00 —21.19 —11.53 *: The test No.6 and No.7 have no limit in ISM band. Remarks: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi—peak and average individually. 2. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 3. Margin value = Emission level — Limit value 4. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 5. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value x2 0P Volue 10b sol00 mikle Report No. :FC170615E07—1 Page No. 14 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

6 Field Strength 6.1 Limits ANY TYPE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED(MISCELLANEOUS) Frequency at 300 meters at 10 meters at 3 meters (MHz) Quasi-Peak (uV/m) Quasi-Peak (dBuV/m) Quasi-Peak (dBuV/m) Any ISM frequency 25 57.50 67.95 Any Non- ISM frequency 15 53.06 63.52 Frequency band in which Range of frequency measurements device operates (MHz) Lowest frequency Highest frequency Lowest frequency generated in the device, Below 1.705 30 MHz but not lower than 9 kHz. Lowest frequency generated in the device, 1.705 to 30 400 MHz but not lower than 9 kHz. Lowest frequency generated in the device Tenth harmonic or 1,000 MHz, 30 to 500 or 25 MHz, whichever is lower. whichever is higher. Lowest frequency generated in the device 500 to 1,000 Tenth harmonic. or 100 MHz, whichever is lower. Tenth harmonic or highest Above 1,000 do detectable emission. Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 15 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

6.2 Test Instruments (below 30MHz) DESCRIPTION & CALIBRATED CALIBRATED MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER DATE UNTIL Test Receiver N9038A MY51210105 July 06, 2016 July 05, 2017 Agilent *Pre-Amplifier EMC001340 980142 Jan. 20, 2016 Jan. 19, 2018 EMCI *Loop Antenna EM-6879 264 Dec. 16, 2016 Dec. 15, 2018 Electro-Metrics LOOPCAB-001 RF Cable 5D-FB Jan. 17, 2017 Jan. 16, 2018 LOOPCAB-002 Software ADT_Radiated_ NA NA NA BVADT V8.7.08 Antenna Tower & Turn Table NA NA NA NA CT Note: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments are 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in 966 Chamber No. G. 3. Tested Date: June 22, 2017 Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 16 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

6.3 Test Arrangement (below 30MHz) a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters above the ground at an accredited test facility. b. The loop antenna is placed at a height of 1.0 m (center of loop) at a set distance of 3 m from the periphery of the EUT. c. Emission readings in frequency range of 0.15 MHz to 30 MHz are measured using a Quasi-Peak detector. d. During the compliance scan, a number of variables should be altered in combination in order to maximize the emission for each frequency. The variables are: - EUT Azimuth. This is varied by rotating the turntable a full 360° for each frequency of interest. - Antenna Azimuth. Position the loop antenna vertically in all azimuths, record the maximum readings obtained. Note1: The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 9kHz for quasi-peak detection (QP) at frequency up to 30MHz. Note2: KDB 414788 OATS and Chamber Correlation Justification -Based on FCC 15.31(f)(2) : measurements may be performed at a distance closer than that specified in the regulations; however, an attempts should be made to avoid making measurements in the near field. -OATs and chamber correlation testing had been performed and chamber measured test result is the worst case test result. Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 17 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

@7 UBaire 6.4 Test Results Detector Function & . L . Quasi—Peak (QP), 200Hz; Frequency Range OkHz 30OMHz Resoluluon Quasi—Peak (QP), 9kHz Bandwidth . Environmental s Input Power DC 5V from USB interface Conditions 25°C, 60%RH Tested by Mike Hsieh Test Mode Mode 1 Antenna Polarity & Test Distance : Horizontal at 3 m Emission mss . Antenna Table Raw Correction No Frt(a&t:_'ezr;cy Level (dlébn\}'}m) M(zrg)m Height Angle Value Factor (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 24413 38.80 QP 68.00 —29.20 1.00 H 234 40.90 —2.10 2* 6.7795 77.30 QP NA NA 1.00 H 304 80.50 —3.20 3 13.5604 63.60 QP 68.00 —4.40 1.00 H 360 67.30 —3.70 4 17.0844 41.60 QP 68.00 —26.40 1.00 H 297 45.80 ~4.20 5 17.6947 45.50 QP 68.00 —22.50 1.00 H 204 49.80 ~4.30 6 20.3399 61.70 QP 68.00 —6.30 1.00 H 360 66.20 ~4.50 7 27.1209 58.90 QP 68.00 —9.10 1.00 H 360 61.90 —3.00 *: The test No.2 has no limit in ISM band. Remarks: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB) — Pre—Amplifier Factor (dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level — Limit value Level (dBuAim} so 70 so 5o 40 30 20 10 a— i i i i i i i i i i i 1 0.008 2500 $000 7.500 10000 12500 15.000 17500 20000 22500 25000 27500 30.000 Frequency (MHz) Report No. :FC170615E07—1 Page No. 18 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

@7 UBaire Detector Function & Quasi—Peak (QP), 200Hz; Frequency Range OkHz ~ 30MHz ll;{aefigultgfl Quasi—Peak (QP), 9kHz Input Power DC 5V from USB interface EZ‘;‘;‘;?O“QE”‘E" 25°C, 60%RH Tested by Mike Hsieh Test Mode Mode 1 Antenna Polarity & Test Distance : Vertical at 3 m Emission mss . Antenna Table Raw Correction No Frt(a&t:_'ezr;cy Level (dlébn\}'}m) M(zrg)m Height Angle Value Factor (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 0.9207 50.20 QP 68.00 —17.80 1.00 V 16 49.00 1.20 2* 6.7795 82.90 QP NA NA 1.00 V 63 86.10 —3.20 3 13.5604 50.20 QP 68.00 —17.80 1.00 V 330 53.90 —3.70 4 17.6947 42.70 QP 68.00 —25.30 1.00 V 253 47.00 ~4.30 5 20.3399 47.10 QP 68.00 —20.90 1.00 V 319 51.60 ~4.50 6 24.5326 43.60 QP 68.00 —24.40 1.00 V 117 47.20 —3.60 7 27.1209 48.00 QP 68.00 —20.00 1.00 V 326 51.00 —3.00 *: The test No.2 has no limit in ISM band. Remarks: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB) — Pre—Amplifier Factor (dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level — Limit value 5. The test point 2 is main power and it has no limit in this ISN band. Level (dBuAim} so 70 so 5o 40 30 20 10 a— i i i i i i i i i i i i 1 ones 2500 s000 7500 10000 12500 15.000 17500 20000 22500 25000 27500 30.000 Frequency (MHz) Report No. :FC170615E07—1 Page No. 19 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

6.5 Test Instruments (30MHZ ~ 1000MHZ) DESCRIPTION & CALIBRATED CALIBRATED MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER DATE UNTIL Test Receiver N9038A MY51210105 July 06, 2016 July 05, 2017 Agilent Pre-Amplifier ZFL-1000VH2B AMP-ZFL-03 Nov. 10, 2016 Nov. 09, 2017 Mini-Circuits Trilog Broadband Antenna VULB 9168 9168-360 Dec. 13, 2016 Dec. 12, 2017 SCHWARZBECK Fixed attenuator UNAT-5+ PAD-CHG-01 Oct. 05, 2016 Oct. 04, 2017 Mini-Circuits CHGCAB-001-1 Oct. 02, 2016 Oct. 01, 2017 8D-FB RF Cable CHGCAB-001-2 Oct. 02, 2016 Oct. 01, 2017 RF-141 CHGCAB-004 Oct. 02, 2016 Oct. 01, 2017 Software ADT_Radiated NA NA NA BVADT _V8.7.08 Antenna Tower & Turn Table NA NA NA NA CT Note: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments are 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in 966 Chamber No. G. 3. Tested Date: June 21, 2017 Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 20 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

6.6 Test Arrangement (30MHz ~ 1000MHz) a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters above the ground at an accredited test facility. The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. b. The EUT was set 3 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower. c. The antenna is a broadband antenna, and its height is varied from one meter to four meters above the ground to determine the maximum value of the field strength. Both horizontal and vertical polarizations of the antenna are set to make the measurement. d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and then the antenna was tuned to heights from 1 meter to 4 meters and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading. e. The test-receiver system was set to quasi-peak detect function and specified bandwidth with maximum hold mode when the test frequency is up to 1 GHz. Note: The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 120kHz for quasi-peak detection (QP) at frequency up to 1GHz. 3m For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related Item – Photographs of the Test Configuration. Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 21 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

@7 UBaire 6.7 Test Results Detector Function & Frequency Range 30MHz ~ 1GHz Resolution Quasi—Peak (QP), 120kHz Bandwidth Input Power DC 5V from USB interface |EXVEONMEM!E! 23°C, 75%RH Tested by Jason Huang Test Mode Mode 1 Antenna Polarity & Test Distance : Horizontal at 10 m Emission mss . Antenna Table Raw Correction No Frt(a&t:_'ezr;cy Level (dlébn\}'}m) M(zrg)m Height Angle Value Factor (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 32.7200 34.51 QP 68.00 —33.49 3.00 H 134 43.68 —9.17 2 144.4400 30.17 QP 68.00 —37.83 3.00 H 134 37.78 —7.61 3 210.1800 34.56 QP 68.00 —33.44 1.00 H 337 45.34 —10.78 4 223.7300 34.52 QP 68.00 —33.48 1.00 H 348 45.18 —10.66 5 237.2900 40.56 QP 68.00 —27.44 1.00 H 352 49.95 —9.39 6 250.8700 41.98 QP 68.00 —26.02 1.00 H 61 50.77 —8.79 Remarks: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB) — Pre—Amplifier Factor (dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level — Limit value Level (dBut/m} 20 80 70 o 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 30 100 200 300 400 500 500 700 500 200 1000 Frequency (MHz) Report No. :FC170615E07—1 Page No. 22 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

@7 UBaire Detector Function & Frequency Range 30MHz ~ 1GHz Resolution Quasi—Peak (QP), 120kHz Bandwidth Input Power DC 5V from USB interface |EXVEONMEM!E! 23°C, 75%RH Tested by Jason Huang Test Mode Mode 1 Antenna Polarity & Test Distance : Vertical at 10 m Emission mss . Antenna Table Raw Correction No Frt(a&t:_'ezr;cy Level (dlébn\}'}m) M(zrg)m Height Angle Value Factor (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 33.9000 35.59 QP 68.00 —32.41 1.00 V 0 44.52 —8.93 2 40.6500 31.09 QP 68.00 —36.91 1.00 V 114 39.58 —8.49 3 117.8800 33.00 QP 68.00 ~35.00 1.00 V 249 42.90 —9.90 4 210.1800 30.95 QP 68.00 —37.05 1.00 V 269 41.73 —10.78 5 311.6200 37.97 QP 68.00 —30.03 2.00 V 0 44.41 —6.44 6 344.9300 38.85 QP 68.00 —29.15 2.00 V 0 44.68 —5.83 Remarks: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB) — Pre—Amplifier Factor (dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level — Limit value Level (dBut/m} 80 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 30 100 200 300 400 500 500 700 500 200 1000 Frequency (MHz) Report No. :FC170615E07—1 Page No. 23 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

6.8 Test Instruments (above 1000MHz) DESCRIPTION & CALIBRATED CALIBRATED MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER DATE UNTIL Test Receiver N9038A MY51210105 July 06, 2016 July 05, 2017 Agilent Horn_Antenna HA-07M18G-NF 0000320091110 Dec. 15, 2016 Dec. 14, 2017 FT-RF Pre-Amplifier 8449B 3008A02578 June 19, 2017 June 18, 2018 Agilent 150406 RF Cable 104 RF cable 131217 Jan. 14, 2017 Jan. 13, 2018 131205 Spectrum Analyzer E4446A MY48250253 Nov. 23, 2016 Nov. 22, 2017 Agilent Pre-Amplifier SLKKa-48-6 9K16 Dec. 10, 2016 Dec. 09, 2017 SPACEK LABS Horn Antenna BBHA 9170 9170-424 Dec. 15, 2016 Dec. 14, 2017 SCHWARZBECK 36442/2 RF Cable SUCOFLEX 102 Dec. 09, 2016 Dec.08, 2017 36434/2 Software ADT_Radiated_ NA NA NA BVADT V8.7.08 Antenna Tower & Turn NA NA NA NA Table CT Note: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments are 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in 966 Chamber No. G. 3. Tested Date: June 21, 2017 Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 24 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

6.9 Test Arrangement (above 1000MHz) a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters above the ground at an accredited chamber room. The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. b. The EUT was set 3 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower. c. The height of antenna can be varied from one meter to four meters, the height of adjustment depends on the EUT height and the antenna 3dB beamwidth both, to detect the maximum value of the field strength. Both horizontal and vertical polarizations of the antenna are set to make the measurement. d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and then the antenna was tuned to heights and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading. e. The spectrum analyzer system was set to peak and average detect function and specified bandwidth with maximum hold mode when the test frequency is above 1 GHz. Note: The resolution bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 1MHz and video bandwidth is 3MHz for Peak detection (PK) at frequency above 1GHz. The resolution bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 1 MHz for Average detection (AV) at frequency above 1GHz. Ant. Tower 1 - 4m Variable EUT& 3m Support Units Turn Table Absorber 80cm Ground Plane Test Receiver The test arrangement is in accordance with ANSI 63.4:2014. For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the Test Configuration. 6.10 Supplementary Information There is not any deviation from the test standards for the test method. Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 25 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

@7 UBaire 6.11 Test Results Detector Function & Peak (PK) / Frequency Range 1GHz ~40GHz Resolution Bandwidth Average (AV), 1MHz . Environmental s Input Power DC 5V from USB interface Conditions 23°C, 73%RH Tested by Jason Huang Test Mode Mode 1 Antenna Polarity & Test Distance : Horizontal at 3 m Emission mss . Antenna Table Raw Correction No Frt(a&t:_'ezr;cy Level (dlébn\}'}m) M(zrg)m Height Angle Value Factor (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 1761.2200 45.99 PK 68.00 —22.01 1.00 H 323 46.58 —0.59 2 1995.7100 46.12 PK 68.00 —21.88 1.00 H 125 45.61 0.51 3 2568.0000 49.27 PK 68.00 —18.73 1.00 H 355 45.86 3.41 4 3334.1200 49.34 PK 68.00 —18.66 1.00 H 149 44.01 5.33 5 3891.7700 49.15 PK 68.00 —18.85 1.00 H 45 41.88 7.27 6 4987.5400 55.67 PK 68.00 —12.33 1.00 H 121 44.52 11.15 Remarks: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB) — Pre—Amplifier Factor (dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level — Limit value Level (dBu¥/m} 2o so 70 so 5o 40 30 20 10 o 1 i i i i i i i 1 1000 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 Frequency (MHz) Report No. :FC170615E07—1 Page No. 26 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

@7 UBaire Detector Function & Peak (PK) / Frequency Range 1GHz ~40GHz ll;{aefigultgfl Average (AV), 1MHz Input Power DC 5V from USB interface |EXVEONMEM!E! 23°C, 73%RH Tested by Jason Huang Test Mode Mode 1 Antenna Polarity & Test Distance : Vertical at 3 m Frequency Emission Limit Margin Antgnna Table Raw Correction No (MHz) Level (dBuV/m) (dB) Height Angle Value Factor (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 1234.1100 42.99 PK 68.00 —25.01 1.00 V 15 46.69 —3.70 2 1944.2800 49.34 PK 68.00 —18.66 1.00 V 172 49.05 0.29 3 1992.6200 49.54 PK 68.00 —18.46 1.00 V 152 49.05 0.49 4 2405.9100 53.30 PK 68.00 —14.70 1.00 V 79 50.40 2.90 5 4804.1200 53.11 PK 68.00 —14.89 1.00 V 48 42.50 10.61 6 5721.0500 54.27 PK 68.00 —13.73 1.00 V 166 40.88 13.39 Remarks: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB) — Pre—Amplifier Factor (dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission level — Limit value Level (dBut/m} 80 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 1 i i i i i i 1 1000 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 Frequency (MHz) Report No. :FC170615E07—1 Page No. 27 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

7 Pictures of Test Arrangements Please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 28 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2

Appendix – Information on the Testing Laboratories We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited and approved according to ISO/IEC 17025. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following: Linko EMC/RF Lab Hsin Chu EMC/RF Lab/Telecom Lab Tel: 886-2-26052180 Tel: 886-3-6668565 Fax: 886-2-26051924 Fax: 886-3-6668323 Hwa Ya EMC/RF/Safety Tel: 886-3-3183232 Fax: 886-3-3270892 Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com Web Site: www.bureauveritas-adt.com The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also. --- END --- Report No. :FC170615E07-1 Page No. 29 / 29 Report Format Version: 6.1.2


Document Created: 2017-07-06 13:14:48
Document Modified: 2017-07-06 13:14:48
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC