SAR test report

FCC ID: JNF-Z-2065S

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_1295535

              Compliance Certification Services Inc.
              Report No.: T100204211-SF        FCC ID: JNF-Z-2065S         Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




                              ANSI/IEEE Std. C95.1-1992
                            in accordance with the requirements of
            FCC Report and Order: ET Docket 93-62, and OET Bulletin 65 Supplement C



                                 FCC TEST REPORT

                                               For


                       Windows CE.NET Handheld Computer


                                   Trade Name: ZEBEX


                                        Model: Z-2065


                                             Issued to

                              ZEBEX INDUSTRIES INC.
                      B1-1, No. 207, Sec 3, Beisin Road, Sindian City,
                                Taipei 231, Taiwan, R.O.C.




                                             Issued by

                       Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                     No. 11, Wugong 6th Rd., Wugu Industrial Park,
                               Taipei Hsien 248, Taiwan.
                                 http://www.ccsrf.com
                                  service@ccsrf.com.




Note: This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance
 Certification Services Inc. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification
      Services Inc. personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.


                                                 Page 1                                  Total Page: 28
                                                                                               Rev. 00


                Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                Report No.: T100204211-SF                                                                Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




                                        TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.    CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (SAR EVALUATION) ................................................3
2.    EUT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................4
3.    REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING DEFINED BY THE FCC .................5
4.    DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SYSTEM ................................................................................5
      4.1      MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM .........................................................................6
      4.2      SYSTEM COMPONENTS.................................................................................................7
5.    EVALUATION PROCEDURES .............................................................................................10
6.    MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ......................................................................................14
7.    EXPOSURE LIMIT ..................................................................................................................16
8.    TYPICAL COMPOSITION OF INGREDIENTS FOR LIQUID TISSUE PHANTOMS .17
9.    MEASUREMENT RESULTS..................................................................................................18
      9.1      TEST LIQUID CONFIRMATION...................................................................................18
      9.2      SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK..............................................................................20
      9.3      EUT TUNE-UP PROCEDURES AND TEST MODE.....................................................22
      9.4      SAR MEASUREMENTS RESULTS...............................................................................24
10.   EUT PHOTOS ...........................................................................................................................25
11.   EQUIPMENT LIST & CALIBRATION STATUS................................................................26
12.   FACILITIES..............................................................................................................................27
13.   REFERENCES ..........................................................................................................................27
14.   ATTACHMENTS......................................................................................................................28




                                                                  Page 2                                                             Rev. 00


                  Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                  Report No.: T100204211-SF                                      Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




1. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (SAR EVALUATION)

Applicant:                          ZEBEX INDUSTRIES INC.
                                    B1-1, No. 207, Sec 3, Beisin Road, Sindian City,
                                    Taipei 231, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Equipment Under Test:               Windows CE.NET Handheld Computer
Trade Name:                         ZEBEX
Model Number:                       Z-2065
Date of Test:                       May 24~31, 2010
Device Category:                    PORTABLE DEVICES
Exposure Category:                  GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE


                            APPLICABLE STANDARDS
                 STANDARD                                TEST RESULT
            FCC OET 65 Supplement C                  No non-compliance noted
                         Deviation from Applicable Standard
                                        None

The device was tested by Compliance Certification Services Inc. in accordance with the measurement
methods and procedures specified in OET Bulletin 65 Supplement C (Edition 01-01). The test results in
this report apply only to the tested sample of the stated device/equipment. Other similar device/equipment
will not necessarily produce the same results due to production tolerance and measurement uncertainties.


Approved by:                                              Tested by:




Rex Lai                                                   Anson Lu
Section Manager                                           Test Engineer
Compliance Certification Services Inc.                    Compliance Certification Services Inc.




                                                     Page 3                                          Rev. 00


                  Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                  Report No.: T100204211-SF                                        Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




2. EUT DESCRIPTION
 Product                            Windows CE.NET Handheld Computer

 Trade Name                         ZEBEX

 Model Number                       Z-2065

 Model Discrepancy                  N/A
                                    1. Power from Adapter
                                       Powertron / PA1024-21
                                       I/P: 100-240VAC, 50-60Hz, 0.6A
 Power Supply                          O/P: 9V, 2.0A, 18W
                                    2. VDC from Battery
                                       Rating: 3.7V, 5000mAH, 18.5Wh
                                    3. Powered from host device via USB cable
                                    802.11b: 2412 ~ 2462 MHz
                                    802.11g: 2412 ~ 2462 MHz
 Frequency Range                    GSM / GPRS / EGPRS: 850: 824.2 ~ 848.8 MHz
                                    GSM / GPRS / EGPRS: 1900: 1850.2 ~ 1909.8 MHz
                                    Bluetooth: 2402 ~ 2483.5 MHz

                                    802.11b: 16.90 dBm
 Max. O/P Power:                    802.11g: 13.33 dBm
                                    GPRS 850: 32.52 dBm / EDGE 850: 26.92 dBm
 (Average)                          GPRS 1900: 29.42 dBm / EDGE 1900: 25.61 dBm
                                    Bluetooth (GFSK): 4.02 dBm     Bluetooth (8DPSK): 2.05 dBm

                                    802.11b: 0.104 W/kg
                                    802.11g: SAR is not required, please refer to page 22.
                                    GPRS 850: 0.455 W/kg (Body position)
 Max. SAR (1g):
                                    EDGE 850: 0.143 W/kg (Body position)
                                    GPRS 1900: 0.375 W/kg (Body position)
                                    EDGE 1900: 0.148 W/kg (Body position)

                                    802.11b: Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS)
                                    802.11g: Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM)
 Modulation Technique               GSM / PCS: GMSK
                                    Bluetooth: GFSK for 1Mbps; π/4-DQPSK for 2Mbps; 8DPSK for 3Mbps

                                    Antenna type:
                                     GPRS: PCS antenna
 Antenna Specification               WLAN: Printed antenna
                                     Bluetooth: CHIP antenna
Remark: The sample selected for test was prototype that approximated to production product and was provided by
manufacturer.




                                                      Page 4                                           Rev. 00


               Compliance Certification Services Inc.
               Report No.: T100204211-SF                                     Date of Issue: May 31, 2010



3. REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING DEFINED BY THE FCC
  The US Federal Communications Commission has released the report and order “Guidelines for
  Evaluating the Environmental Effects of RF Radiation", ET Docket No. 93-62 in August 1996 [1].
  The order requires routine SAR evaluation prior to equipment authorization of portable transmitter
  devices, including portable telephones. For consumer products, the applicable limit is 1.6 mW/g for
  an uncontrolled environment and 8.0 mW/g for an occupational/controlled environment as
  recommended by the ANSI/IEEE standard C95.1-1992 [6]. According to the Supplement C of OET
  Bulletin 65 “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guide-lines for Human Exposure to Radio frequency
  Electromagnetic Fields", released on Jun 29, 2001 by the FCC, the device should be evaluated at
  maximum output power (radiated from the antenna) under “worst-case” conditions for normal or
  intended use, incorporating normal antenna operating positions, device peak performance frequencies
  and positions for maximum RF energy coupling.

4. DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
  These measurements were performed with the automated near-field scanning system DASY4/DAST5
  from Schmid & Partner Engineering AG (SPEAG). The system is based on a high precision robot
  (working range greater than 0.9 m) which positions the probes with a positional repeatability of better
  than ± 0.02 mm. Special E- and H-field probes have been developed for measurements close to
  material discontinuity, the sensors of which are directly loaded with a Schottky diode and connected
  via highly resistive lines to the data acquisition unit. The SAR measurements were conducted with
  the dosimetric probe EX3DV4-SN: 3554 (manufactured by SPEAG), designed in the classical
  triangular configuration and optimized for dosimetric evaluation. The probe has been calibrated
  according to the procedure with accuracy of better than ±10%. The spherical isotropy was evaluated
  with the procedure and found to be better than ±0.25 dB. The phantom used was the SAM Twin
  Phantom as described in FCC supplement C, IEEE P1528 and EN50361.




                                                  Page 5                                         Rev. 00


              Compliance Certification Services Inc.
              Report No.: T100204211-SF                                          Date of Issue: May 31, 2010



4.1 MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM




     The DASY4/DASY5 system for performing compliance tests consists of the following items:
     • A standard high precision 6-axis robot (St¨aubli RX family) with controller, teach pendant and
         software. An arm extension for accommodating the data acquisition electronics (DAE).
     • A dosimetric probe, i.e., an isotropic E-field probe optimized and calibrated for usage in tissue
         simulating liquid. The probe is equipped with an optical surface detector system.
     • A data acquisition electronics (DAE) which performs the signal amplification, signal multiplexing,
         AD-conversion, offset measurements, mechanical surface detection, collision detection, etc. The unit
         is battery powered with standard or rechargeable batteries. The signal is optically transmitted to the
         EOC.
     • The Electro-optical converter (EOC) performs the conversion between optical and electrical of the
         signals for the digital communication to the DAE and for the analog signal from the optical surface
         detection. The EOC is connected to the measurement server.
     • The function of the measurement server is to perform the time critical tasks such as signal filtering,
         control of the robot operation and fast movement interrupts.
     • A probe alignment unit which improves the (absolute) accuracy of the probe positioning.
     • A computer operating Windows 2000 or Windows XP.
     • DASY4/DAST5 software.
     • Remote control with teach pendant and additional circuitry for robot safety such as warning lamps,
         etc.
     • The SAM twin phantom enabling testing left-hand and right-hand usage.
     • The device holder for handheld mobile phones.
     • Tissue simulating liquid mixed according to the given recipes.
     • Validation dipole kits allowing validating the proper functioning of the system.




                                                    Page 6                                            Rev. 00


                   Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                   Report No.: T100204211-SF                                           Date of Issue: May 31, 2010



4.2 SYSTEM COMPONENTS

DASY4/DASY5 Measurement Server
                                     The DASY4/DASY5 measurement server is based on a PC/104 CPU board
                                     with a 166MHz low-power Pentium, 32MB chip disk and 64MB RAM. The
                                     necessary circuits for communication with either the DAE3 electronic box as
                                     well as the 16-bit AD-converter system for optical detection and digital I/O
                                     interface are contained on the DASY4/DASY5 I/O-board, which is directly
                                     connected to the PC/104 bus of the CPU board.
                                     The measurement server performs all real-time data evaluation for field
                                     measurements and surface detection, controls robot movements and handles
                                     safety operation.
                          The PC-operating system cannot interfere with these time critical processes. All
                          connections are supervised by a watchdog, and disconnection of any of the cables to the
                          measurement server will automatically disarm the robot and disable all program-
                          controlled robot movements. Furthermore, the measurement server is equipped with two
                          expansion slots which are reserved for future applications. Please note that the expansion
                          slots do not have a standardized pinout and therefore only the expansion cards provided
                          by SPEAG can be inserted. Expansion cards from any other supplier could seriously
                          damage the measurement server. Calibration: No calibration required.



Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE)
The data acquisition electronics (DAE3) consists of a highly
sensitive electrometer grade preamplifier with auto-zeroing, a
channel and gain-switching multiplexer, a fast 16 bit AD converter
and a command decoder and control logic unit. Transmission to the
measurement server is accomplished through an optical downlink
for data and status information as well as an optical uplink for
commands and the clock. The mechanical probe mounting device
includes two different sensor systems for frontal and sideways
probe contacts. They are used for mechanical surface detection and
probe collision detection. The input impedance of the DAE3 box is
200MOhm; the inputs are symmetrical and floating. Common
mode rejection is above 80 dB.

EX3DV4 Isotropic E-Field Probe for Dosimetric Measurements
Construction:  Symmetrical design with triangular core
               Built-in shielding against static charges
               PEEK enclosure material (resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE)
Calibration:   Basic Broad Band Calibration in air: 10-3000 MHz.
               Conversion Factors (CF) for HSL 900 and HSL 1800
               CF-Calibration for other liquids and frequencies upon request.
Frequency:     10 MHz to > 6 GHz; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB (30 MHz to 3 GHz)
Directivity:   ± 0.3 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis)
               ± 0.5 dB in HSL (rotation normal to probe axis)
Dynamic Range: 10 µW/g to > 100 mW/g; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB
                (noise: typically < 1 µW/g)




                                                          Page 7                                            Rev. 00


                     Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                     Report No.: T100204211-SF                                            Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




Dimensions:         Overall length: 330 mm (Tip: 20 mm)
                    Tip diameter: 2.5 mm (Body: 12 mm)
                    Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 1 mm
Application:        High precision dosimetric measurements in any
                    exposure scenario (e.g., very strong gradient
                    fields). Only probe which enables compliance
                    testing for frequencies up to 6 GHz with
                    precision of better 30%.

                                                                      Interior of probe
SAM Phantom (V4.0)
Construction:      The shell corresponds to the specifications of
                   the Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin
                   (SAM) phantom defined in IEEE 1528-200X,
                   CENELEC 50361 and IEC 62209. It enables
                   the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand
                   phone usage as well as body mounted usage at
                   the flat phantom region. A cover prevents
                   evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings
                   on the phantom allow the complete setup of all
                   predefined phantom positions and measurement
                   grids by manually teaching three points with
                   the robot.
Shell Thickness: 2 ±0.2 mm
Filling Volume: Approx. 25 liters
Dimensions:        Height: 810mm; Length: 1000mm; Width:
                   500mm
SAM Phantom (ELI4)
Description
Construction:      Phantom for compliance testing of handheld
                   and body-mounted wireless devices in the
                   frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz. ELI4 is
                   fully compatible with the latest draft of the
                   standard IEC 62209 Part II and all known tissue
                   simulating liquids. ELI4 has been optimized
                   regarding its performance and can be integrated
                   into our standard phantom tables. A cover
                   prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference
                   markings on the phantom allow installation of
                   the complete setup, including all predefined
                   phantom positions and measurement grids, by
                   teaching three points. The phantom is supported
                   by software version DASY4/DASY5.5 and
                   higher and is compatible with all SPEAG
                   dosimetric probes and dipoles
Shell Thickness:   2.0 ± 0.2 mm (sagging: <1%)
Filling Volume: Approx. 25 liters
Dimensions:     Major ellipse axis: 600 mm
Minor axis:     400 mm 500mm




                                                                Page 8                                        Rev. 00


                   Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                   Report No.: T100204211-SF                                                  Date of Issue: May 31, 2010



Device Holder for SAM Twin Phantom
Construction:   In combination with the Twin SAM Phantom V4.0 or Twin SAM, the Mounting
                Device (made from POM) enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter in
                spherical coordinates, whereby the rotation point is the ear opening. The devices
                can be easily and accurately positioned according to IEC, IEEE, CENELEC,
                FCC or other specifications. The device holder can be locked at different
                phantom locations (left head, right head, and flat phantom).




System Validation Kits for SAM Phantom (V4.0)
Construction:     Symmetrical dipole with l/4 balun Enables measurement of
                  feedpoint impedance with NWA Matched for use near flat
                  phantoms filled with brain simulating solutions Includes distance
                  holder and tripod adaptor.
Frequency:        450, 900, 1800, 2450, 5800 MHz
Return loss:      > 20 dB at specified validation position
Power capability: > 100 W (f < 1GHz); > 40 W (f > 1GHz)
Dimensions:       D450V2: dipole length: 270 mm; overall height: 330 mm
                  D835V2: dipole length: 161 mm; overall height: 340 mm
                  D900V2: dipole length: 148.5 mm; overall height: 340 mm
                  D1800V2: dipole length: 72.5 mm; overall height: 300 mm
                  D1900V2: dipole length: 67.7 mm; overall height: 300 mm
                  D1900V3: dipole length: 67.0 mm; overall height: 300 mm
                  D2450V2: dipole length: 51.5 mm; overall height: 290 mm
                  D5GHzV2: dipole length: 20.6 mm; overall height: 300 mm
System Validation Kits for ELI4 phantom
Construction:     Symmetrical dipole with l/4 balun Enables measurement of
                  feedpoint impedance with NWA Matched for use near flat
                  phantoms filled with brain simulating solutions Includes distance
                  holder and tripod adaptor.
Frequency:        450, 900, 1800, 2450, 5800 MHz
Return loss:      > 20 dB at specified validation position
Power capability: > 100 W (f < 1GHz); > 40 W (f > 1GHz)
Dimensions:       D450V2: dipole length: 270 mm; overall height: 330 mm
                  D835V2: dipole length: 161 mm; overall height: 340 mm
                  D900V2: dipole length: 148.5 mm; overall height: 340 mm
                  D1800V2: dipole length: 72.5 mm; overall height: 300 mm
                  D1900V2: dipole length: 67.7 mm; overall height: 300 mm
                  D1900V3: dipole length: 67.0 mm; overall height: 300 mm
                  D2450V2: dipole length: 51.5 mm; overall height: 290 mm
                  D5GHzV2: dipole length: 20.6 mm; overall height: 300 mm




                                                             Page 9                                               Rev. 00


                    Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                    Report No.: T100204211-SF                                                                    Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




5. EVALUATION PROCEDURES

DATA EVALUATION
The DASY4/DAST5 post processing software (SEMCAD) automatically executes the following procedures to
calculate the field units from the microvolt readings at the probe connector. The parameters used in the evaluation
are stored in the configuration modules of the software:
             Probe parameters:       - Sensitivity                   Normi, ai0, ai1, ai2
                                     - Conversion factor             ConvFi
                                     - Diode compression point       dcpi
             Device parameters:      - Frequency                     f
                                     - Crest factor                  cf
             Media parameters:       - Conductivity                  σ
                                     - Density                       ρ
These parameters must be set correctly in the software. They can be found in the component documents or be
imported into the software from the configuration files issued for the DASY components. In the direct measuring
mode of the multi-meter option, the parameters of the actual system setup are used. In the scan visualization and
export modes, the parameters stored in the corresponding document files are used.
The first step of the evaluation is a linearization of the filtered input signal to account for the compression
characteristics of the detector diode. The compensation depends on the input signal, the diode type and the DC-
transmission factor from the diode to the evaluation electronics. If the exciting field is pulsed, the crest factor of the
signal must be known to correctly compensate for peak power. The formula for each channel can be given as:
                                          2        cf
                    V =U +U
                       i      i           i
                                              ⋅
                                                  dcp i

            with    Vi        = Compensated signal of channel i                               (i = x, y, z)
                    Ui        = Input signal of channel i                                     (i = x, y, z)
                    cf        = Crest factor of exciting field                                (DASY parameter)
                    dcpi      = Diode compression point                                       (DASY parameter)

From the compensated input signals the primary field data for each channel can be evaluated:
            E-field probes:                        V
                              E       =                           i
                                  i
                                              Norm • ConvF    i


                                                                                               2

            H-field probes:                                            a +a f +a f
                                                                      i10   i11         i12

                                                   H      i
                                                              =   Vi ⋅
                                                                            f
            with    Vi    = Compensated signal of channel i                                   (i = x, y, z)
                    Normi = Sensor sensitivity of channel i                                   (i = x, y, z)
                            µV/(V/m)2 for E0field Probes
                    ConvF = Sensitivity enhancement in solution
                    aij   = Sensor sensitivity factors for H-field probes
                    f     = Carrier frequency (GHz)
                    Ei    = Electric field strength of channel i in V/m
                    Hi    = Magnetic field strength of channel i in A/m




                                                                              Page 10                                                Rev. 00


                    Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                    Report No.: T100204211-SF                                                 Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




The RSS value of the field components gives the total field strength (Hermitian magnitude):
                                     2             2        2
                    E   tot
                              =    E +E +E
                                     x             y        z


The primary field data are used to calculate the derived field units.

                                         2             σ
                    SAR = E                    ⋅
                                         tot
                                                   ρ   ⋅1000

            with    SAR           = local specific absorption rate in mW/g
                    Etot          = total field strength in V/m
                    σ             = conductivity in [mho/m] or [Siemens/m]
                    ρ             = equivalent tissue density in g/cm3
Note that the density is normally set to 1 (or 1.06), to account for actual brain density rather than the density of the
simulation liquid.
The power flow density is calculated assuming the excitation field as a free space field.
                                     2
                                   E                   or       P
                                                                              2
                                                                          = H tot ⋅ 37.7
                    P         =      tot
                                                                    pwe
                        pwe
                                  3770
            with    Ppwe = Equivalent power density of a plane wave in mW/cm2
                    Etot    = total electric field strength in V/m
         Htot      = total magnetic field strength in A/m




                                                                                    Page 11                       Rev. 00


                   Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                   Report No.: T100204211-SF                                            Date of Issue: May 31, 2010



SAR MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES
The procedure for assessing the peak spatial-average SAR value consists of the following steps:
•   Power Reference Measurement
    The reference and drift jobs are useful jobs for monitoring the power drift of the device under test in the batch
    process. Both jobs measure the field at a specified reference position, at a selectable distance from the phantom
    surface. The reference position can be either the selected section’s grid reference point or a user point in this
    section. The reference job projects the selected point onto the phantom surface, orients the probe
    perpendicularly to the surface, and approaches the surface using the selected detection method.
•   Area Scan
    The area scan is used as a fast scan in two dimensions to find the area of high field values, before doing a finer
    measurement around the hot spot. The sophisticated interpolation routines implemented in DASY4/DAST5
    software can find the maximum locations even in relatively coarse grids. The scan area is defined by an
    editable grid. This grid is anchored at the grid reference point of the selected section in the phantom. When the
    area scan’s property sheet is brought-up, grid was at to 15 mm by 15 mm and can be edited by a user.
•   Zoom Scan
    Zoom scans are used to assess the peak spatial SAR values within a cubic averaging volume containing 1 g and
    10 g of simulated tissue. The default zoom scan measures 7x7x9 points within a cube whose base faces are
    centered around the maximum found in a preceding area scan job within the same procedure. If the preceding
    Area Scan job indicates more then one maximum, the number of Zoom Scans has to be enlarged accordingly
    (The default number inserted is 1).
•   Power Drift measurement
    The drift job measures the field at the same location as the most recent reference job within the same procedure,
    and with the same settings. The drift measurement gives the field difference in dB from the reading conducted
    within the last reference measurement. Several drift measurements are possible for one reference measurement.
    This allows a user to monitor the power drift of the device under test within a batch process. In the properties
    of the Drift job, the user can specify a limit for the drift and have DASY4/DAST5 software stop the
    measurements if this limit is exceeded.
•   Z-Scan
    The Z Scan job measures points along a vertical straight line. The line runs along the Z-axis of a one-
    dimensional grid. A user can anchor the grid to the current probe location. As with any other grids, the local Z-
    axis of the anchor location establishes the Z-axis of the grid.




                                                         Page 12                                              Rev. 00


              Compliance Certification Services Inc.
              Report No.: T100204211-SF                                           Date of Issue: May 31, 2010



SPATIAL PEAK SAR EVALUATION
The procedure for spatial peak SAR evaluation has been implemented according to the IEEE1529 standard. It
can be conducted for 1 g and 10 g.
The DASY4/DAST5 system allows evaluations that combine measured data and robot positions, such as:
   • maximum search
   • extrapolation
   • boundary correction
   • peak search for averaged SAR
During a maximum search, global and local maximum searches are automatically performed in 2-D after each
Area Scan measurement with at least 6 measurement points. It is based on the evaluation of the local SAR
gradient calculated by the Quadratic Shepard’s method. The algorithm will find the global maximum and all
local maxima within -2 dB of the global maxima for all SAR distributions.
Extrapolation
Extrapolation routines are used to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner
phantom surface. The extrapolation distance is determined by the surface detection distance and the probe
sensor offset. Several measurements at different distances are necessary for the extrapolation.
Extrapolation routines require at least 10 measurement points in 3-D space. They are used in the Cube Scan to
obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The routine uses the
modified Quadratic Shepard’s method for extrapolation. For a grid using 7x7x9 measurement points with 5mm
resolution amounting to 441 measurement points, the uncertainty of the extrapolation routines is less than 1%
for 1 g and 10 g cubes.
Boundary effect
For measurements in the immediate vicinity of a phantom surface, the field coupling effects between the probe
and the boundary influence the probe characteristics. Boundary effect errors of different dosimetric probe types
have been analyzed by measurements and using a numerical probe model. As expected, both methods showed
an enhanced sensitivity in the immediate vicinity of the boundary. The effect strongly depends on the probe
dimensions and disappears with increasing distance from the boundary. The sensitivity can be approximately
given as:




Since the decay of the boundary effect dominates for small probes (a<<λ), the cos-term can be omitted. Factors
Sb (parameter Alpha in the DASY4/DAST5 software) and a (parameter Delta in the DASY4/DAST5 software)
are assessed during probe calibration and used for numerical compensation of the boundary effect. Several
simulations and measurements have confirmed that the compensation is valid for different field and boundary
configurations.
This simple compensation procedure can largely reduce the probe uncertainty near boundaries. It works well as
long as:
   • the boundary curvature is small
   • the probe axis is angled less than 30_ to the boundary normal
   • the distance between probe and boundary is larger than 25% of the probe diameter
   • the probe is symmetric (all sensors have the same offset from the probe tip)
Since all of these requirements are fulfilled in a DASY4/DAST5 system, the correction of the probe boundary
effect in the vicinity of the phantom surface is performed in a fully automated manner via the measurement data
extraction during postprocessing.




                                                    Page 13                                            Rev. 00


                    Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                    Report No.: T100204211-SF                                              Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




6. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
DASY4:
                            UNCERTAINTY BUDGE ACCORDING TO IEEE P1528
                                                                                             Standard
                                Uncertainty Probability
     Error Description                                          Divisor       C1 1g         unc.(1g/10g)    V1 or Veff
                                 Value ±% distribution
                                                                                                ±%
Measurement System
Probe calibration                        ±4.8         normal              1           1              ±4.8            ∞
                                                                                     1/2
Axial isotropy of probe                  ±4.6     rectangular         √3 (1-Cp)                      ±1.9            ∞
                                                                                     1/2
Sph. Isotropy of probe                   ±9.7     rectangular         √3      (Cp)                   ±3.9            ∞
Probe linearity                          ±4.5     rectangular         √3              1              ±2.7            ∞
Detection Limit                          ±0.9     rectangular         √3              1              ±0.6            ∞
Boundary effects                         ±8.5     rectangular         √3              1              ±4.8            ∞
Readoutelectronics                       ±1.0         normal              1           1              ±1.0            ∞
Response time                            ±0.9     rectangular         √3              1              ±0.5            ∞
Integration time                         ±1.2     rectangular         √3              1              ±0.8            ∞
Mech Constrains of robot                 ±0.5     rectangular         √3              1              ±0.2            ∞
Probe positioning                        ±2.7     rectangular         √3              1              ±1.7            ∞
Extrap. And integration                  ±4.0     rectangular         √3              1              ±2.3            ∞
RF ambient conditiona                  ±0.54      rectangular         √3              1             ±0.43            ∞
Test Sample Related
Device positioning                       ±2.2         normal              1           1             ±2.23           11
Device holder uncertainty                  ±5         normal              1           1              ±5.0            7
Power drift                                ±5     rectangular         √3              1              ±2.9            ∞
Phantom and Set up
Phantom uncertainty                        ±4     rectangular         √3              1              ±2.3            ∞
Liquid conductivity                        ±5     rectangular         √3         0.6                 ±1.7            ∞
Liquid conductivity                        ±5     rectangular         √3         0.6             ±3.5/1.7            ∞
Liquid permittivity                        ±5     rectangular         √3         0.6                 ±1.7            ∞
Liquid permittivity                        ±5     rectangular         √3         0.6                 ±1.7            ∞


Combined Standard
                                                                                            ±12.14/11.76
Uncertainty
Coverage Factor for 95%                                  k=2
Expanded Standard
                                                                                            ±24.29/23.51
Uncertainty
    Table: Worst-case uncertainty for DASY4 assessed according to IEEE P1528.
    The budge is valid for the frequency range 300 MHz to 6G Hz and represents a worst-case analysis.




                                                      Page 14                                                  Rev. 00


                      Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                      Report No.: T100204211-SF                                             Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




Dasy5:
                            UNCERTAINTY BUDGE ACCORDING TO IEEE P1528
                                                                                            Standard
                                  Uncertainty Probability
Error Description                 Value ±%
                                                                     Divisor   C1 1g        unc.(1g/10g)   V1 or Veff
                                              distribution                                  ±%
Measurement System
Probe calibration                 ±5.9            normal             1         1            ±5.9           ∞
Axial isotropy of probe           ±4.7            rectangular        √3        (1-Cp)1/2    ±1.9           ∞
                                                                                      1/2
Sph. Isotropy of probe            ±9.6            rectangular        √3        (Cp)         ±3.9           ∞
Probe linearity                   ±4.7            rectangular        √3        1            ±2.7           ∞
Detection Limit                   ±1.0            rectangular        √3        1            ±0.6           ∞
Boundary effects                  ±1.0            rectangular        √3        1            ±0.6           ∞
Readoutelectronics                ±0.3            normal             1         1            ±0.3           ∞
Response time                     ±0.8            rectangular        √3        1            ±0.5           ∞
Integration time                  ±2.6            rectangular        √3        1            ±1.5           ∞
Probe positioning                 ±0.4            rectangular        √3        1            ±0.2           ∞
Extrap. And integration           ±4.0            rectangular        √3        1            ±2.3           ∞
RF ambient conditiona             ±3.0            rectangular        √3        1            ±1.7           ∞
RF ambient conditiona             ±3.0            rectangular        √3        1            ±1.7           ∞
Test Sample Related
Device positioning                ±2.9            normal             1         1            ±2.9           145
Device holder uncertainty         ±3.6            normal             1         1            ±3.6           5
Power drift                       ±5.0            rectangular        √3        1            ±2.9           ∞
Phantom and Set up
Phantom uncertainty               ±4.0            rectangular        √3        1            ±2.3           ∞
Liquid conductivity               ±5.0            rectangular        √3        0.6          ±1.8/1.2       ∞
Liquid conductivity               ±1.5            rectangular        √3        0.6          ±0.6           ∞
Liquid permittivity               ±5.0            rectangular        √3        0.6          ±1.7/1.4       ∞
Liquid permittivity               ±1.0            rectangular        √3        0.6          ±0.4           ∞


Combined Standard Uncertainty                                                               ±10.375
Coverage Factor for 95%                           k=2
Expanded Standard Uncertainty                                                               ±20.75
    Table: Worst-case uncertainty for DASY5 assessed according to IEEE P1528.
    The budge is valid for the frequency range 300 MHz to 6G Hz and represents a worst-case analysis.




                                                           Page 15                                               Rev. 00


               Compliance Certification Services Inc.
               Report No.: T100204211-SF                                          Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




7. EXPOSURE LIMIT
  (A). Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (W/kg)
      Whole-Body       Partial-Body     Hands, Wrists, Feet and Ankles
      0.4             8.0               2.0


  (B). Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (W/kg)
      Whole-Body       Partial-Body     Hands, Wrists, Feet and Ankles
      0.08            1.6               4.0
     NOTE:     Whole-Body SAR is averaged over the entire body, partial-body SAR is averaged over any
               1 gram of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube. SAR for hands, wrists,
               feet and ankles is averaged over any 10 grams of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the
               shape of a cube.
     Population/Uncontrolled Environments:
     are defined as locations where there is the exposure of individuals who have no knowledge or
     control of their exposure.
     Occupational/Controlled Environments:
     are defined as locations where there is exposure that may be incurred by people who are aware of
     the potential for exposure, (i.e. as a result of employment or occupation).


                                      NOTE
                   GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE
                               PARTIAL BODY LIMIT
                                     1.6 W/kg




                                                    Page 16                                             Rev. 00


                  Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                  Report No.: T100204211-SF                                                             Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




8. TYPICAL COMPOSITION OF INGREDIENTS FOR LIQUID TISSUE
   PHANTOMS
  The following tissue formulations are provided for reference only as some of the parameters have not been
  thoroughly verified. The composition of ingredients may be modified accordingly to achieve the desired target
  tissue parameters required for routine SAR evaluation.
         Ingredients                                                   Frequency (MHz)
        (% by weight)               450                   835                     915                   1900               2450
         Tissue Type        Head          Body    Head          Body      Head          Body    Head           Body   Head      Body
            Water           38.56         51.16   41.45         52.4      41.05         56.0    54.9           40.4   62.7      73.2
         Salt (NaCl)        3.95          1.49    1.45          1.4       1.35          0.76    0.18           0.5     0.5     0.04
            Sugar           56.32         46.78   56.0          45.0      56.5          41.76    0.0           58.0    0.0      0.0
            HEC             0.98          0.52     1.0          1.0        1.0          1.21     0.0           1.0     0.0      0.0
          Bactericide       0.19          0.05     0.1          0.1        0.1          0.27     0.0           0.1     0.0      0.0
         Triton X-100       0.0           0.0      0.0          0.0        0.0          0.0      0.0           0.0    36.8      0.0
            DGBE             0.0           0.0     0.0          0.0        0.0           0.0    44.92          0.0     0.0     26.7
      Dielectric Constant   43.42         58.0    42.54         56.1      42.0          56.8    39.9           54.0   39.8     52.5
      Conductivity (S/m)    0.85          0.83    0.91          0.95       1.0          1.07    1.42           1.45   1.88     1.78

  Salt: 99+% Pure Sodium Chloride            Sugar: 98+% Pure Sucrose
                             +
  Water: De-ionized, 16 MΩ resistivity       HEC: Hydroxyethyl Cellulose
  DGBE: 99+% Di(ethylene glycol) butyl ether, [2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol]
  Triton X-100 (ultra pure): Polyethylene glycol mono [4-(1, 1, 3, 3-tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]ether




                                                                Page 17                                                        Rev. 00


                  Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                  Report No.: T100204211-SF                                           Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




9. MEASUREMENT RESULTS
9.1 TEST LIQUID CONFIRMATION
   SIMULATING LIQUIDS PARAMETER CHECK
   The simulating liquids should be checked at the beginning of a series of SAR measurements to determine of the
   dielectric parameters are within the tolerances of the specified target values
   The relative permittivity and conductivity of the tissue material should be within ± 5% of the values given in the
   table below. 5% may not be easily achieved at certain frequencies. Under such circumstances, 10% tolerance
   may be used until more precise tissue recipes are available
   IEEE SCC-34/SC-2 P1528 RECOMMENDED TISSUE DIELECTRIC PARAMETERS
   The head tissue dielectric parameters recommended by the IEEE SCC-34/SC-2 in P1528 have been
   incorporated in the following table. These head parameters are derived from planar layer models simulating the
   highest expected SAR for the dielectric properties and tissue thickness variations in a human head. Other head
   and body tissue parameters that have not been specified in P1528 are derived from the tissue dielectric
   parameters computed from the 4-Cole-Cole equations and extrapolated according to the head parameters
   specified in P1528
       Target Frequency                        Head                                     Body
            (MHz)                      εr               σ (S/m)                 εr               σ (S/m)
              150                    52.3                 0.76                 61.9                0.80
              300                    45.3                 0.87                 58.2                0.92
              450                    43.5                 0.87                 56.7                0.94
              835                    41.5                 0.90                 55.2                0.97
              900                    41.5                 0.97                 55.0                1.05
              915                    41.5                 0.98                 55.0                1.06
              1450                   40.5                 1.20                 54.0                1.30
              1610                   40.3                 1.29                 53.8                1.40
           1800-2000                 40.0                 1.40                 53.3                1.52
              2450                   39.2                 1.80                 52.7                1.95
              3000                   38.5                 2.40                 52.0                2.73
              5800                   45.3                 5.27                 48.2                6.00




                                                        Page 18                                             Rev. 00


                  Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                  Report No.: T100204211-SF                                                        Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




SIMULATING LIQUIDS PARAMETER CHECK RESULTS
Date: May 24, 2010                      Ambient condition: Temperature 24.6°C; Relative humidity: 52%
           B od y S im u latin f L iq u id
                                                       P aram eters        T arget    M easu red    D eviation [% ]   Lim ited [% ]
  F req u en cy    T em p . [°C ]    D ep th [cm ]
                                                        P erm itivity:     5 5 .2 0     5 4 .9 0        -0 .5 4            ±5
  835 M Hz            2 3 .6 0           1 5 .0 0
                                                      C on d u ctivity:    0 .9 7       0 .9 8 1        1 .1 3            ± 5

Date: May 25, 2010                      Ambient condition: Temperature 24.6°C; Relative humidity: 52%
          Body Simulating Liquid
                                                      Parameters          Target      Measured     Deviation[%] Limited[%]
  Frequency       Temp. [°C]        Depth (cm)
                                                       Permitivity:       53.30         51.70          -3.00             ±5
 1900 MHz            23.60              15.00
                                                     Conductivity:         1.52         1.52            0.00             ±5

Date: May 31, 2010                      Ambient condition: Temperature 24.6°C; Relative humidity: 52%
          Body Simulating Liquid
                                                      Parameters          Target      Measured     Deviation[%] Limited[%]
  f (MHz)         Temp. [°C]        Depth (cm)
                                                     Permitivity:         52.70        51.90          -1.52             ±5
  2450.00            23.30             15.00
                                                     Conductivity:        1.95         1.94           -0.51             ±5



   850MHz
   Body liquid                                                  1900MHz
   15cm                                                         Body liquid
                                                                15cm




  2450MHz
  Body liquid
  15cm




                                                                Page 19                                                    Rev. 00


                       Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                       Report No.: T100204211-SF                                                       Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




9.2 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK
  The system performance check is performed prior to any usage of the system in order to guarantee reproducible
  results. The system performance check verifies that the system operates within its specifications. The system
  performance check results are tabulated below. And also the corresponding SAR plot is attached as well in the
  SAR plots files.
  SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK MEASUREMENT CONDITIONS
  •      The measurements were performed in the flat section of the SAM twin phantom filled with Body
         simulating liquid of the following parameters.
  •      The DASY4/DAST5 system with an E-field probe EX3DV4 SN:3554 was used for the measurements.
  •      The dipole was mounted on the small tripod so that the dipole feed point was positioned below the center
         marking of the flat phantom section and the dipole was oriented parallel to the body axis (the long side of
         the phantom). The standard measuring distance was 15 mm (below 1 GHz) and 10 mm (above 1 GHz)
         from dipole center to the simulating liquid surface.
  •      The coarse grid with a grid spacing of 10mm was aligned with the dipole.
  •      Special 7x7x7 fine cube was chosen for cube integration (dx= 5 mm, dy= 5 mm, dz= 5 mm).
  •      Distance between probe sensors and phantom surface was set to 2.5 mm.
  •      The dipole input power (forward power) was 250 mW±3%.
  •      The results are normalized to 1 W input power.
  Reference SAR values
  The reference SAR values were using measurement results indicated in the dipole calibration document (see
  table below)
      Frequency                                           Local SAR at Surface     Local SAR at Surface
                           1g SAR          10g SAR
        (MHz)                                              (Above Feed Point) (y = 2cm offset from feed point)
           900                10.3                6.57                16.4                                   5.4

          1800                38.2                20.3                69.5                                   6.8

      2450(Body)              51.4                24.2                128.8                                 N/A


  SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK RESULTS


  Dipole: D835V2 SN: 4d015
  Date: May 24, 2010                          Ambient condition: Temperature 24.6°C; Relative humidity: 52%
                B od y S im u latin f L iq u id
                                                          P aram eters         T arget    M easu red   D eviation [% ]   Lim ited [% ]
      F req u en cy     T em p . [°C ]    D ep th [cm ]
                                                            P erm itivity:     5 5 .2 0    5 4 .9 0        -0 .5 4            ±5
       8 3 5 .0 0          2 3 .6 0           1 5 .0 0    C on d u ctivity:    0 .9 7      0 .9 8 1        1 .1 3            ± 5
                                                                1g SAR :       9 .6 2       9 .7 2         1 .0 4            ± 5
  ps. 1g SAR is equal 4x2.43(250mW forward power SAR value)




                                                                     Page 20                                                   Rev. 00


                   Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                   Report No.: T100204211-SF                                                        Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




Dipole: D1900V2 SN: 5d056
Date: May 25, 2010                        Ambient condition: Temperature 24.6°C; Relative humidity: 52%
            B od y S im u latin f L iq u id
                                                       P aram eters         T arget    M easu red   D eviation [% ]   Lim ited [% ]
 F req u en cy      T em p . [°C ]    D ep th [cm ]
                                                         P erm itivity:     5 3 .3 0    5 1 .7 0        -3 .0 0            ±5
  1 9 0 0 .0 0         2 3 .6 0           1 5 .0 0    C on d u ctivity:     1 .5 2       1 .5 2         0 .0 0             ± 5
                                                             1g SAR :       4 1 .6 0    4 2 .4 0        1 .9 2             ± 5
ps. 1g SAR is equal 4x10.6(250mW forward power SAR value)


Dipole: D2450V2 SN: 817
Date: May 31, 2010                        Ambient condition: Temperature 24.6°C; Relative humidity: 52%
           B od y S im u latin g Liq u id
                                                       P aram eters         T a rget   M easu red   D eviation [% ]   L im ited [% ]
   f(M H z)        T em p . [°C ]     D ep th [cm ]
                                                       P erm itivity:       5 2 .7 0    5 1 .9 0        -1 .5 2            ± 5
  2 4 5 0 .0 0         2 3 .3 0          1 5 .0 0     C on d u c tivity:    1 .9 5       1 .9 4         -0 .5 1            ± 5
                                                         1g SAR :           5 1 .6 0    5 2 .4 0        1 .5 5             ± 5

ps. 1g SAR is equal 4x13.1(250mW forward power SAR value)




                                                                  Page 21                                                   Rev. 00


                 Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                 Report No.: T100204211-SF                                             Date of Issue: May 31, 2010



9.3 EUT TUNE-UP PROCEDURES AND TEST MODE
o Software used to control the EUT for staying in continuous transmitting mode was
  programmed.
o The output power(dBm) we measured before and after SAR test in different channel
o During SAR test, test maximum output power channel first.

  Output powers are measured as below:
Conducted output power (Average)(dBm)
                                   GPRS mode                              EGPRS mode
                            Before SAR test     After SAR test      Before SAR test    After SAR test

                Ch 128            32.52               32.46              29.42             29.36
  GSM850        Ch 190            32.32                  n/a             29.31              n/a
                Ch 251            32.02                  n/a             29.41              n/a
                                      GPRS mode                              EGPRS mode
                            Before SAR test     After SAR test      Before SAR test    After SAR test

                Ch 512            26.92               26.87              25.61             25.66
 GSM1900        Ch 661            26.62                  n/a             25.52              n/a
                Ch 810            26.23                  n/a             25.51              n/a


Bluetooth output power (Average)(dBm)
         Mode                     DATA1 1M                                   DATA3 3M
Frequency            before test            after test             before test          after test
    2402 MHz             4.05                                         2.05
                                             N/A                                         N/A
    2441 MHz             -13.50       SAR measurement                 2.12        SAR measurement
                                       is not required                             is not required
     2480 MHz        -12.92                               2.38
Ps. (1)4.05dBm=2.54mW is less than 24.98mW(60/f), so Bluetooth stand-alone SAR is not required.
802.11b / 802.11g Conducted Power (Avg)(dBm):
         Mode
                     802.11b 1M           802.11b 1M            802.11g 6M            802.11g 6M
Frequency           before SAR test       after SAR test       before SAR test        after SAR test

  1(2412 MHz)            16.90                16.84                  13.33                 n/a
  6(2437 MHz)            13.77                 n/a                   12.80                 n/a
  11(2462 MHz)           16.25                 n/a                   12.30                 n/a
  Ps. 1) 802.11b mode maximum output power is 16.90dBm(48.98mW), is higher than
  24.88mW(60/f)mW, so 802.11b SAR test is required.
    2) 802.11g mode maximum output power is 13.33dBm(21.53mW), is less than 24.88mW(60/f)mW,
  so 802.11g SAR test is not required.




                                                         Page 22                                           Rev. 00


                     Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                     Report No.: T100204211-SF                                               Date of Issue: May 31, 2010



KDB 447498 RF Exposure Assessments:

                                                                                                 EGPRS 1900
                               GPRS 850 body        GPRS 1900 body EGPRS 850 body
                                                                                                    body
GPRS/EGPRS SAR(worst)               0.455                 0.375                 0.143              0.148
   802.11b SAR(worst)               0.104                 0.104                 0.104                0.104
  Bluetooth SAR(worst)                0                     0                       0                  0
        Σ1g-SAR                     0.559                 0.479                 0.247                0.252
                                  Less than             Less than             Less than            Less than
            remark
                                1.6W/kg(limit)        1.6W/kg(limit)        1.6W/kg(limit)       1.6W/kg(limit)


Simultaneous SAR evaluation:
      device, mode, f            P, dBm     P, mW            stand-alone SAR(W/kg)


    T1, GPRS 850/1900            32.52      1786.49                    Yes,
                                                                Please refer page 24

  T2, WLAN main, 802.11b         16.90       48.98                     Yes,
                                                                Please refer page 24

    T3, Bluetooth, 2480           4.05       2.54                         No,
                                                                       < (60/f)mW



    (x,y)            dxy, cm     simultaneous Tx SAR                                remarks

                                                                                dxy <2.5cm
  (T1,T2)              1.2                  No                           the 1-g SAR < 1.2 W/kg,
                                                                        please refer to page 22~24

                                                                                dxy >2.5cm
  (T1,T3)              3.0                  No                          please refer to page 22~24

                                                                                dxy <2.5cm
  (T2,T3)              1.5                  No                           the 1-g SAR < 1.2 W/kg,
                                                                        please refer to page 22~24




                                                          Page 23                                                 Rev. 00


                   Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                   Report No.: T100204211-SF                                           Date of Issue: May 31, 2010



9.4 SAR MEASUREMENTS RESULTS




               Body Face Up                                                    Body Face Down
Test mode: GPRS 850, Duty Cycle: 25%, Crest Factor: 4                             Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm
                                       Frequency                      Liquid         SAR (1g)          Limit
EUT Position     Antenna
                                 Channel         MHz                 Temp_°C          (W/kg)          (W/kg)
   Face Up        Fixed            128             824.2              23.6             0.317            1.6

 Face Down        Fixed            128             824.2              23.6             0.455            1.6
Test mode: EGPRS 850, Duty Cycle: 25%, Crest Factor: 4                             Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm
                                       Frequency                      Liquid         SAR (1g)          Limit
EUT Position     Antenna
                                 Channel         MHz                 Temp_°C          (W/kg)          (W/kg)
 Face Down        Fixed            128             824.2              23.6             0.143            1.6
Test mode: GPRS 1900, Duty Cycle: 25%, Crest Factor: 4                             Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm
                                       Frequency                      Liquid         SAR (1g)          Limit
EUT Position     Antenna
                                 Channel         MHz                 Temp_°C          (W/kg)          (W/kg)
   Face Up        Fixed            512            1850.2              23.6             0.176            1.6

 Face Down        Fixed            512            1850.2              23.6             0.375            1.6
Test mode: EGPRS 1900, Duty Cycle: 25%, Crest Factor: 4                            Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm
                                       Frequency                      Liquid         SAR (1g)          Limit
EUT Position     Antenna
                                 Channel         MHz                 Temp_°C          (W/kg)          (W/kg)
 Face Down        Fixed            512            1850.2              23.6             0.148            1.6
Test mode: 802.11b, Duty Cycle: 100%, Rate=1M, Crest Factor: 1                     Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm
                                       Frequency                      Liquid         SAR (1g)          Limit
EUT Position     Antenna
                                 Channel         MHz                 Temp_°C          (W/kg)          (W/kg)
   Face Up        Fixed              1              2412              23.6             0.104            1.6

 Face Down        Fixed              1              2412              23.6             0.014            1.6
Notes: 1) Please refer to attachment for the result presentation in plot format.




                                                           Page 24                                         Rev. 00


             Compliance Certification Services Inc.
             Report No.: T100204211-SF                        Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




10. EUT PHOTOS




Bluetooth antenna                            WLAN antenna




                                             GPS
Bluetooth antenna                            antenna   GPRS antenna




                                          Page 25                                 Rev. 00


                       Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                       Report No.: T100204211-SF                                         Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




11. EQUIPMENT LIST & CALIBRATION STATUS
                                                                                            Calibration    Calibration
          Name of Equipment             Manufacturer      Type/Model     Serial Number
                                                                                            Cycle(days)       Due
S-Parameter Network Analyzer          Agilent           E8358A         US40260243          365            07/07/2010
Electronic Probe kit                  Hewlett Packard   85070D         N/A                 N/A            N/A

Power Meter                           Anritsu           ML2495A        1012009             365            03/28/2011
Power Sensor                          Anritsu           MA2411B        0917072             365            03/09/2011
Spectrum Analyzer                     Agilent           E4446A         US42510268          365            11/25/2010
Wireless Communication Test Set       Agilent           E5515C 8960    MY48363204          365            07/29/2010
Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE)    SPEAG             DAE4           558                 365            07/16/2010
Dosimetric E-Field Probe              SPEAG             EX3DV4         3554                365            09/21/2010
835 MHz System Validation Dipole      SPEAG             D835V2         4d015               730            11/17/2010
1900 MHz System Validation Dipole     SPEAG             D1900V2        5d056               730            11/17/2010
Probe Alignment Unit                  SPEAG             LB (V2)        348                 N/A            N/A

Robot                                 Staubli           RX90B L        F02/5T69A1/A/01 N/A                N/A

SAM Twin Phantom V4.0                 SPEAG             N/A            N/A                 N/A            N/A

Devices Holder                        SPEAG             N/A            N/A                 N/A            N/A

Head/ Muscle 835 MHz                  CCS               H/M 835A       N/A                 N/A            N/A

Head/ Muscle 1900 MHz                 CCS               H/M 1900A      N/A                 N/A            N/A




                                                          Page 26                                               Rev. 00


                Compliance Certification Services Inc.
                Report No.: T100204211-SF                                         Date of Issue: May 31, 2010




12. FACILITIES
  All measurement facilities used to collect the measurement data are located at
        No. 81-1, Lane 210, Bade Rd. 2, Luchu Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien, Taiwan, R.O.C.
        No. 11, Wugong 6th Rd., Wugu Industrial Park, Taipei Hsien 248, Taiwan.
        No. 199, Chunghsen Road, Hsintien City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan, R.O.C.
13. REFERENCES
  [1]   Federal Communications Commission, \Report and order: Guidelines for evaluating the environ-mental
        effects of radiofrequency radiation", Tech. Rep. FCC 96-326, FCC, Washington, D.C. 20554, 1996.
  [2]   David L. Means Kwok Chan, Robert F. Cleveland, \Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for
        human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields", Tech. Rep., Federal Communication
        Commision, O_ce of Engineering & Technology, Washington, DC, 1997.
  [3]   Thomas Schmid, Oliver Egger, and Niels Kuster, \Automated E-_eld scanning system for dosimetric
        assessments", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, pp. 105{113, Jan. 1996.
  [4]   Niels Kuster, Ralph K.astle, and Thomas Schmid, \Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications
        equipment with known precision", IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, pp.
        645{652, May 1997.
  [5]   CENELEC, \Considerations for evaluating of human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from
        mobile telecommunication equipment (MTE) in the frequency range 30MHz - 6GHz", Tech. Rep.,
        CENELEC, European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization, Brussels, 1997.
  [6]   ANSI, ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992: IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to
        Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics
        Engineers, Inc., New York, NY 10017, 1992.
  [7]   Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \Robust setup for precise calibration of E-_eld probes
        in tissue simulating liquids at mobile communications frequencies", in ICECOM _ 97, Dubrovnik,
        October 15{17, 1997, pp. 120{124.
  [8]   Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \E-_eld probe with improved isotropy in brain
        simulating liquids", in Proceedings of the ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, 23{25 June, 1996, pp. 172{175.
  [9]   Volker Hombach, Klaus Meier, Michael Burkhardt, Eberhard K. uhn, and Niels Kuster, \The dependence
        of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 900 MHz", IEEE Transactions onMicrowave
        Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1865{1873, Oct. 1996.
  [10] Klaus Meier, Ralf Kastle, Volker Hombach, Roger Tay, and Niels Kuster, \The dependence of EM energy
       absorption upon human head modeling at 1800 MHz", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and
       Techniques, Oct. 1997, in press.
  [11] W. Gander, Computermathematik, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992.
  [12] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky,W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recepies in C, The Art of
       Scientific Computing, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992..Dosimetric Evaluation of
       Sample device, month 1998 9
  [13] NIS81 NAMAS, \The treatment of uncertainity in EMC measurement", Tech. Rep., NAMAS Executive,
       National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, England, 1994.
  [14] Barry N. Taylor and Christ E. Kuyatt, \Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST
       measurement results", Tech. Rep., National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1994. Dosimetric
       Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 10




                                                     Page 27                                           Rev. 00


             Compliance Certification Services Inc.
             Report No.: T100204211-SF                Date of Issue: May 31, 2010



14. ATTACHMENTS
 Exhibit Content

   1     System Performance Check Plots

   2     SAR Test Plots




                                    END OF REPORT




                                          Page 28                         Rev. 00



Document Created: 2010-06-11 14:53:20
Document Modified: 2010-06-11 14:53:20

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC