Modular Approval Letter

FCC ID: I28-ZBRZQ3BT

Cover Letter(s)

Download: PDF
FCCID_3539494

                                                                                             775 Montague Expressway
                                                                                             Milpitas, CA 95035
 fl                                                                                           Tel: 408—526—1188
SlEMlC                                                                                       Fax: 408—526—1088
glora.tesive & cermecanons                                                                   Email: TCB@siemic.com




                                      Declaration Letter




                                                                        Revision History
                 Reason for Amendment (current / obsolete)             From            To    Approved Date

                          Initial Release (Obsolete)                   1.0            1.0      Dec—04—2006
                     Added IC Modular Letter (Obsolete)                1.0            2.0      Feb 16 2009
                     Add LMA and MA option (Obsolete)                  2.0            3.0     April 14 2010
                  Revised per RSS Gen issue 3.0 (Obsolete)             3.0            4.0      Jan 12 2011
                        Removed Foot(2) (obsolete)                     4.0            5.0     July 19 2011
                Adding New note per KDB996369 DO1 VO1R03               5.0            6.0    August 29 2011
                                   (obsolete)
                Updated company template & Added text box              6.0            7.0     Jan—31—2012
                                  (obsolete)
                  Updated modular requirement (obsolete)               7.0            8.0     Sept 05 2014
                 Updated template to meet RSP 100 issue 10             8.0            9.0     Nov 20 2014
                                (obsolete)
                 Updated template to meet RSP 100 issue 11             9.0            10.0   March 19 2015
                                (obsolete))
                Revised the Modular Requirement statements             10.0           11.0    July 28, 2016
                                  (current)




SCS—F26 Modular Approval Letter                          Page 1 of 3                             Rev 11.0


Date: August 10, 2017

(Product name) FCC ID :                  128—ZBRZQ3BT             ,

is seeking FCC Authorization as a [_]Single Modular transmitter /[X] Single Limited Modular Approval (Please check one)
The EUT meets the requirements for [_]Single Modular approval / [|Single Limited Modular Approval (please check one)
as detailed in KDB 996369. Compliance to each of the requirementsis described below:

Item                                    Modular requirement                                             Yes       No          Please provide a detailed explanation if the answeris
                                                                                                                                                          No,"

 1            Haveits own RF shielding                                                                  X

 2            Have buffered modulation/data inputs (if such inputs are provided)                        X

 3            The modular transmitter must have its own power supply                                    x
              regulation.

 4            Meet the antenna requirements of section 15.203                                           X
              Be tested in a stand—alone configuration, i.e., the antenna, AC or                                           Module was nottested in a stand—alone
 5            DC power and data input/output lines must be connected to the                                      x         configuration.
              module but, the module must not be inside another case during
              testing.
              Be labeled with its own FCC ID number, and if the FCC ID is not
 6            visible when the module is installed inside another device, then                          x
              the outside of the device into which the module is installed must
              also display a label referring to the enclosed module.
              The modular transmitter is manufactured so that the user can not
 7            influence the operation of the transmitter that will operate outside                      X
              of the scope of the regulations.
              Address compliance with the Commission‘s RF exposure limits
 8            in Sections 11310 and 2.1093.
Note:
        (1)    LMA may be granted when one or more of the requirements in the table above cannot be demonstrated.
               LMA will also be issued in those instances where applicants can demonstrate that they will retain control overthe final installation of the device, such that compliance of the
               end product is assured. In such cases, an operating condition on the LMA for the module must state that the module is only approved for use when installed in devices
               produced by a specific manufacturer.
               When LMA is sought, the application for equipment certification must specifically state how control of the end product into which the module will be installed, and will be
               maintained, such thatfull compliance of the end product is always ensured.
        (2)    Please provide Clear and specific instructions describing the conditions, limitationsand procedures for third—parties to use and/orintegrate the module into a host device.
        (3)    For non—Software Defined Radio transmitter modules where software is used to ensure complianceof the device, technical description of how such control is implemented
               to ensure prevention of third party modification must be provided (see KDB 594280).

Note 1: Compliance of a module in its final configuration is the responsibility of the applicant. A host device will not be considered certified if the instructions
regarding antenna configuration provided in the original description, of one or more separately certified modules it contains, were not followed.
Example: A separately certified low—powertransceiver module using Bluetooth technology which is housed in a desktop computer, laptop or peripheral does not
require the overall system to be recertified, if the desktop computer, laptop or peripheral, as a stand—alone unit, complies with all applicable technical standards.




Charles A. Derrow, Director of Compliance Engineering
Zebra Technologies Corporation, 3 Overlook Point
Lincolnshire, IL 60069 USA
cderrow@zebra.com / 847—793—5719



SCS—F26 Modular Approval Letter                                                    Page 2 of 3                                                          Rev 11.0



Document Created: 2017-08-16 11:03:45
Document Modified: 2017-08-16 11:03:45

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC