SAR CALIBRATION REPORT Part1

FCC ID: HD5-EDA510

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_3874491

Report No.: BL-EC1850176-701 CALIBRATION REPORT F.1 E-Field Probe

) m unue} COMOSAR E—FIELD PROBE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.75.1.18.SATU.A Name Function Date Signature Prepared by : Jérome LUC Product Manager 3/16/2018 fi/ Checked by : Jérome LUC Product Manager 3/16/2018 fi/ Approved by : Kim RUTKOWSKI Quality Manager |3/16/2018 ,,,,, authe@t‘ Customer Name SHENZHEN noohurian . Distribution : BALUN TECHNOLOGY Co..Ltd. Issue Date M cations A 3/16/2018 Initial release Page: 2/10 This document shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the written agproval ofMVG The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG

LU1 unc COMOSAR E—FIELD PROBE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.75.1.18.SATU.A TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DeVICE UNUGF T@B——mmmmmmmmmeemmnmmemmmemmmemmnmmmmmmmmmmmmmmensmmmene s 2. PROGUCt D@SCPIDHON ........s.cccensmencenmmmmmmnceeneecenmnnceennnnrennnnrenmenneeenennreennmenceeenneeennmmnccene 4 2.1 General Information $ Messurement M@hod ———m=mmanemmnmemmummemmnnmenemememmenenet 4 31 Linearity s 3.2 Sensitivity n 3.3 Lower Detection Limit t 3.4 Isotropy t 3.5 Boundary Effect w 4 Measurement Uncertainty.. $ CABDEATION MOAEUERMIOTH RORUIEN .cs 1000 e0000seeeeeesseversseereecomereveceeeesesereeemestegecccene 6 §1 Sensitivity in air a 5.2 Linearity —o— $3 Sensitivity in liquid 5.4 Isotropy m 6 LiSt Of EQJUIPMOME ... ces cscecesnncecnmnnnreeennennmnnerenmnneeennnnereennnereenennnerenmnneeeenmnnreennnnnece 10 Page: 3/10 This document shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the written agproval ofMVG The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG

C mm T VG COMOSAR E—FIELD PROBE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.75.1.18.SATU.A 1 DEVICE UNDER TEST Device Under Test Device Type COMOSAR DOSIMETRIC E FIELD PROBE Manufacturer Vave Model SSE2 Serial Number SN 31/17 EPGO321 Product Condition (new / used) New Frequency Range of Probe 0.45 GHz—6GHz Resistance of Three Dipoles at Connector Dipole 1: R1=0.200 MQ Dipole 2: R2=0.226 MQ Dipole 3: R3—0.205 MQ A yearly calibration interval is recommended. 2 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 21 GENERAL INFORMATION MVG‘s COMOSAR E field Probes are built in accordance to the IEEE 1528, OET 65 Bulletin C and CEVIEC 62209 standards. Figure 1 — MVG COMOSAR Dosimetric Efield Dipole Probe Length 330 mm Length of Individual Dipoles 2 mm Maximum extemal diameter 8 mm Probe Tip Extenal Diameter 2.5 mm Distance between dipoles / probe extremity 1 mm 3 MEASUREMENT METHOD The IEEE 1528, OET 65 Bulletin C, CENELEC ENS0361 and CELIEC 62209 standards provide recommended practices for the probe calibrations, including the performance characteristics of interest and methods by which to assess their affect. All calibrations / measurements performed meet the fore mentioned standards. 3.1 LINEARITY The evaluation of the lincarity was done in free space using the waveguide, performing a power sweep to cover the SAR range 0.01 W/kg to 100W/kg. Page: 4/10 This document shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the written agproval ofMVG The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG

C mm unue] COMOSAR E—FIELD PROBE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.75.1.18.SATU.A 3.2 SENSIMIVITY The sensitivity factors of the three dipoles were determined using a two step calibration method (air and tissue simulating liquid) using waveguides as outlined in the standards. 3.3 LOWER DETECTION LMIT The lower detection limit was assessed using the same measurement set up as used for the linearity measurement. The required lower detectionlimit is 10 mW/kg. 3.4 ISOTROPY The axial isotropy was evaluated by exposing the probe to a reference wave from a standard dipole with the dipole mounted under the flat phantom in the test configuration suggested for system validations and checks. The probe was rotated along its main axis from 0 — 360 degrees in 15 degree steps. The hemispherical isotropy is determined by inserting the probe in a thin plastic box filled with tissue—equivalentliquid, with the plastic box illuminated with the fields from a half wave dipole. The dipole is rotated about its axis (0°—180°) in 15° increments. At each step the probe is rotated about its axis (0°—360°). 3.5 BOUNDARY EFFECT The boundary effect is defined as the deviation between the SAR measured data and the expected exponential decay in the liquid when the probeis oriented normal to the interface. To evaluate this effect, the liquid filled flat phantom is exposed to fields from either a reference dipole or waveguide. With the probe normal to the phantom surface, the peak spatial average SAR is measured and compared to the analytical value at the surface. 4 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY The guidelines outlined in the IEEE 1528, OET 65 Bulletin C, CENELEC EN30361 and CEMIEC 62209 standards were followed to generate the measurement uncertainty associated with an E—field probe calibration using the waveguide technique. All uncertainties listed below represent an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2. traceable to the Internationally Accepted Guides to Measurement Uncertainty. Uncertainty analysis of the probe calibration in waveguide Uncertainty Probability teg a Standard ERRORSONRCES value (%) Distribution Bisisor € Uncertainty (%) Incident or forward power 3.00% Rectangular fi | § 1.732% Reflected power 3.00% Rectangular \/5 | 1 1.732% Liquid conductivity 5.00% Rectangular \/5 | 1 2.887% Liquid permittivity 4.00% Rectangular \/5 | 1 2309% Field homogeneity 3.00% Rectangular \/5 | 1 1.732% Field probe positioning 5.00% Rectangular \6 | 1 2.887% Page: 5/10 This document shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the written approval ofMVG. The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG

LU1 unue} COMOSAR E—FIELD PROBE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.75.1.18.SATU.A Field probe linearity 3.00% Rectangular \/5 | 1.732% Combined standard uncertainty 5.831% Expanded uncertainty 120% 95 % confidence level k = 2 t ~*° 5 CALIBRATION MEASUREMENT RESULTS Calibration Parameters Liquid Temperature 21°C Lab Temperature 2°C Lab Humidity 45% 5.1 SENSITIVITY IN AIR Normx dipole Normy dipole Normz dipole 1 (uV/(V/m)) 2 (uV/(V/im)) 3 (uV/(V/imY) 0.62 0.76 0.67 DCP dipole 1 DCP dipole 2 DCP dipole 3 (mV) (mV) (mV) 91 $3 96 Calibration curves ei=f(V) (i=1,2.3) allow to obtain H—field value using the formula: E:,/ /‘ +£," +€," Calibration curves Eliield (Vn) Dipole 1 Dipole 2 Dipcle 3 o 0 Voltage (V) Page: 6/10 This document shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the written agproval ofMVG The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG

) m unue] COMOSAR E—FIELD PROBE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.75.1.18.SATU.A 5.2 LINEARITY Linearity s o Linearity Envor (c8) # 6 6 6 s 1 Eied (V/m) Linearity.1+1.64% (+0.070B 5.3 SENSITIVITY IN LIQUID Liguid Frequency Permittivity Epsilon ($/m) ConvE MHz+/— 100MHz) HL450 450 4217 0.86 1.86 BL450 450 57.65 0.95 1.91 HL750 750 40.03 0.93 1.60 BL750 750 56.83 1.00 1.66 HL850 835 4219 0.90 1.71 BL850 835 54.67 1.01 1.78 HL900 200 42.08 1.01 1.68 BL900 200 5525 1.08 1.73 HL1800 1800 41.68 1.46 1.86 BL1800 1800 53.86 1.46 1.90 HL1900 1900 38.45 1.45 217 BL1900 1900 5332 1.56 235 HL2000 2000 38.26 1.38 216 BL2000 2000 52.70 1.51 335 HL2450 2450 37.50 1.80 233 BL2450 2450 5322 1.89 241 HL2600 2600 39.80 1.99 239 BL2600 2600 §552 223 237 HLS200 5200 35.64 4.67 23 BL5200 5200 48.64 5.51 22%6 HLS400 5400 36.44 4.87 217 BL5400 5400 46.52 5.77 224 HLS600 5600 36.66 5.17 237 BL5600 5600 46.79 5.77 235 HLS800 5800 35.31 5.31 233 BLS800 5800 47.04 6.10 239 LOWER DETECTION LIMIT: $mW/kg Page: 7/10 This document shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the written agproval ofMPG. The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and isnot to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG

C mm T VG COMOSAR E—FIELD PROBE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.75.1.18.SATU.A 5.4 ISOTROPY HL900 MHz — Axial isotropy: 0.04 dB — Hemispherical isotropy: 0.05 dB isotrapy curves Drosas Oree aso was r0! . HL1800 MHz — Axial isotropy: 0.04 dB — Hemispherical isotropy: 0.07 dB isotropy curres t | 1e . 4o 38 as o« c db oz o% o6 oo to Page: 8/10 This document shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the written approval ofMVG. The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG

) m unue] COMOSAR E—FIELD PROBE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.75.1.18.SATU.A HL5600 MHz — Axial isotropy: 0.06 dB — Hemispherical isotropy: 0.09 dB isotropy curves 3s os o« o2 co o2 o+ o6 oo 10 Page: 9/10 This document shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the written approval ofMVG. The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG

Report No.: BL-EC1850176-701

nue SAR Reference Dipole Calibration Report Ref : ACR.93.8.17.SATU.A SHENZHEN BALUN TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. BLOCK B, FL 1, BAISHA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARK, SHAHE XI ROAD, NANSHAN DISTRICT, SHENZHEN, GUANGDONG PROVINCE, P.R. CHINA 518055 MVG COMOSAR REFERENCE DIPOLE FREQUENCY: 2450 MHZ SERIAL NO.: SN 11/17 DIP 2G450—452 Calibrated at MVG US 2105 Barrett Park Dr. — Kennesaw, GA 30144 I ng 24///3:\\? [accrepitep) Zuletubs® cxitretoncerr aszesos Calibration Date: 03/22/2017 Summary: This document presents the method and results from an accredited SAR referencedipole calibration performed in MVG USA using the COMOSAR test bench. All calibration results are traceable to national metrology institutions.

) m unue] SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.93.8.17.SATU.A Name Function Date Signature Prepared by : Jérome LUC Product Manager 4/3/2017 fi Checked by : Jérome LUC Product Manager 4/3/2017 fi Approved by : Kim RUTKOWSKT Quality Manager 4/3/2017 Jum Puthawih! Customer Name SHENZHEN capg R BALUN Distribution : TECHNOLOGY Co..Ltd. Issue Date M cations A 4/3/2017 Initial release Page: 2/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the writien approval ofMVG. The information containedherein is to be used onlyfor thepurposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMTG.

) m unue) SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT B ACK.93817.BATU—A TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. MFOONEHION——mmmmmemmmmmmemmmnmmmmmenmmememememmmemenemianmesmemnemensne 4 2 Device Under Test 4 3 PFOUOEDeSGCHIPNON ——.omm—unomumnmennennnemaenemnemenmenenenetm 4 3.1 General Information 4 4 MEMSUCMENEM@UOA ——=—=—mmurmmumnnpcemmunmnnmmnnmenenumnemenanen 5 4.1 Return Loss Requirements $ 4.2 Mechanical Requirements 5 5. M@ASUPCM@NE URCGMIAIMLY ........ccccensececnsecenmmencennmnnennmnreremnneenmnrcenmenrennmnneenmmemnmeen 3 §1 Return Loss 3 §2 Dimension Measurement 5 $3 Validation Measurement 3 6 Calibration Measurement Results 6.1 Return Loss and Impedance In Head Liquid 6 6.2 Return Loss and Impedance In Body Liquid 6 6.3 Mechanical Dimensions 6 T NALRNONIMONRUEOMOAE ... smm—ememmemmmmermnmmeremmemmmemmmemmcensinessemesmsemees 7 7.1 Head Liquid Measurement 7 72 SAR Mecasurement Result With Head Liquid 8 7.3 Body Liquid Measurement 9 7.4 SAR Measurement Result With Body Liquid 10 8 List of Equipment Page: 3711 This document shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the writien approval ofMVG. The information containedherein is to be used onlyfor thepurposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMTG.

C mm mvG SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.93.8.17.SATU.A 1 INTRODUCTION This document contains a summary of the requirements set forth by the IEEE 1528, FCC KDBs and CEVIEC 62209 standards for reference dipoles used for SAR measurement system validations and the measurements that were performed to verify that the product complies with the fore mentioned standards. 2 DEVICE UNDER TEST Device Under Test Device Type COMOSAR 2450 MHz REFERENCE DIPOLE Manufacturer MVG Model $1D2450 Serial Number SN 11/17 DIP 2G450—452 Product Condition (new / used) New A yearly calibration interval is recommended. 3 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 3.1 GENERAL INFORMATION MVG‘s COMOSAR Validation Dipoles are built in accordance to the IEEE 1528, FCC KDBs and CEVIEC 62209 standards. The product is designed for use with the COMOSAR test bench only. Figure 1 —MVG COMOSAR Validation Dipole Page: 4/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the writen approval ofMVG. The information containedherein is to be used onlyfor thepurposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG.

C mm unue) SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT B ACK.938 17.BATU—A 4 MEASUREMENT METHOD The IEEE 1528, FCC KDBs and CEUIEC 62209 standards provide requirements for reference dipoles used for system validation measurements. The following measurements were performed to verify that the product complies with the fore mentioned standards. 4.1 RETURN LOSS REQUIREMENTS The dipole used for SAR system validation measurements and checks must have a return loss of —20 dB or better. The return loss measurement shall be performed against a liquid filled flat phantom, with the phantom constucted as outlined in the fore mentioned standards. 4.2 MECHANICAL REQUIREMENTS The IEEE Std. 1528 and CEVIEC 62209 standards specify the mechanical components and dimensions of the validation dipoles, with the dimensions frequency and phantom shell thickness dependent. The COMOSAR test bench employs a 2 mm phantom shell thickness therefore the dipoles sold for use with the COMOSAR test bench comply with the requirements set forth for a 2 mm phantom shell thickness. 5 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY All uncertainties listed below represent an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximatelythe 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2,traceable to the Internationally Accepted Guides to Measurement Uncertainty. 5.1 RETURNLOSS The following uncertainties apply to the return loss measurement: Frequency band Expanded Uncertainty on Return Loss 400—6000MHz 0.1 dB 5.2 DIMENSION MEASUREMENT The following uncertainties apply to the dimension measurements: Length (mm) Expanded Uncertainty on Length 3 — 300 0.05 mm 5.3 VALIDATION MEASUREMENT The guidelines outlined in the IEEE 1528, FCC KDBs, CENELEC ENS50361 and CEVIEC 62209 standards were followed to generate the measurement uncertainty for validation measurements. Scan Volume Expanded Uncertainty 1g 20.3 % Page: 5/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the writien approval ofMVG. The information containedherein is to be used onlyfor thepurpose for which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMTG.

) m SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.93.8.17.SATU.A 10 g 20.1 % 6 CALIBRATION MEASUREMENT RESULTS 6.1 RETURN LOSS AND IMPEDANCE IN HEAD LIQUID Frequency, MHz 2350 2200 2i00 2420 2440 2460 2e 2600 2520 2550 Frequency (MHz) Return Loss (dB) Requirement (dB) Impedance 2450 —24.82 —20 44.3 O +0.2 jQ 6.2 RETURN LOSS AND IMPEDANCE IN BODY LIQUID Frequency. MHz z50 2sen 2ico 2izn 2uad 2aso nago 2600 2520 Frequency (MHz) Return Loss (dB) Requirement (dB) Impedance 2450 —31.92 —20 47.5 G — 0.4 j0 6.3 MECHANICAL DIMENSIONS Frequency MHz L mm h mm d mm required measured required measured required measured 300 420.0 1 %. 250.0 +1 %. 6.35 :1 %. Page: 6/11 Thisdocument shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the writen approval ofMVG The information containedhereinisto be used onlyfor thepurpose for which it is submitted and is not to be releasedin whole orpart without written approval ofMTG

) m unue) SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.93.8.17.SATU.A aso 290.0 %1 %. 166.741%. 635 +1 % 750 176.0 41 %. 100.0 #1%. 6.35 :1 %. 835 161.041%. s0.4 21 % 3641%. 900 149.041%. 833 +1%. 36:1%. 1450 89.1 +1 %. 51.741% 3.6:1%. 1500 80.5 £1%. 50.0 41 % 3.641%. 1640 79.0%1%. 45.7 +1 %. 3641%. 1750 75.241%. 42.9 :1 %. 36:1%. 1800 72.041%. 41.7 +1 %. 36:1%. 1900 68.0 +1 %. 39.5 £1 %. 3.641%. 1950 66.3 21 %. 38.5 :1 %. 36+1%. 2000 64.5 21 %. 37.5 +1 %. 3641%. 2100 61.0 +1 %. 35.7 +1 %. 3.641%. 2300 55.5 41 %. 32.6 41 %. 36+1%. 2450 51.5 41 %. pass 30.4 +1 %. Pass 36:1%. Fass 2600 48.5 k1 %. 28.8 +1 %. 3.641%. 3000 415 k1 %. 25.041 %. 3611%. 3500 37.081%. 264 1 %. 3611%. 3700 34.741%. 264 1 %. 36:1%. 7 VALIDATION MEASUREMENT The IEEE Std. 1528, FCC KDBs and CEVIEC 62209 standards state that the system validation measurements must be performed using a reference dipole meeting the fore mentioned return loss and mechanical dimension requirements. The validation measurement must be performed against a liquid filled flat phantom, with the phantom constructed as outlined in the fore mentioned standards. Per the standards, the dipole shall be positioned belowthe bottom of the phantom, with the dipole length centered and parallel to the longest dimension of the flat phantom, with the top surface of the dipole at the described distance from the bottom surface of the phantom. 7.1 HEAD LIQUID MEASUREMENT Fm&‘i"“’ Relative permittivity (€,‘) Conductivity (0) 5/m required measured required measured 300 45.3 £5% 0.87 25 % aso 43.5 25 % 0.87 25 % 750 41.9 +5 % 0.89 £5 % 835 415 £5% 0.90 +5 % 900 415 £5% 0.97 25 % 1450 40.5 15 % 12025 % 1500 40.4 £5% 123:5% 1640 40.2 £5% 13145% 1750 40.1 £5% 13725% Page: 7/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the writien approval ofMVG. The information containedherein is to be used onlyfor thepurpose for which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMTG.

) m unue) SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT B ACK.938 17.BATU—A 1800 40.0 £5% 14025 % 1900 40.0 £5 % 1.40 £5 % 1950 40.0 25 % 140 25 % 2000 40.0 £5% 140 25 % 2100 39.8 25 % 1.49 25 % 2300 30.5 +5 % 16715 % 2450 39.2 +5 % Pass 1.80 25 % Pass 2600 39.0 +5 % 19545 % 3000 38.5 +5 % 24045% 3500 37.9 25 % 2.9145% 7.2 SAR MEASUREMENT RESULT WITH HEAD LIQUID The IEEE Std. 1528 and CEIIEC 62209 standards state that the system validation measurements should produce the SAR values shown below (for phantom thickness of 2 mm), within the uncertainty for the system validation. All SAR values are normalized to 1 W forward power. In bracket,the measured SAR is given with the used input power. Software OPENSAR V4 Phantom SN 20/09 SAM71 Probe: SN 18/11 EPG122 Liquid Head Liquid Values: eps® 37.5 sigma : 1.80 Distance between dipole center and liquid 10.0 mm Area scan resolution dx—8mm/dy—8mm Zoon Scan Resol dx—5mm/dy—5mm/dz=5mm F 2450 MHz 20 dBm Liquid T °C Lab T 21°C Lab Humidi 45% F’e"\‘d'fl"“’ 18 SAR (W/ke/w) 10 g SAR (W/ke/w) required measured required measured 300 2.85 194 450 4.58 306 750 8.49 5.55 835 9.56 622 900 10.9 6.99 1450 29 16 1500 30.5 16.8 1640 342 18.4 1750 36.4 19.3 1800 38.4 20.1 Page: 8/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the writien approval ofMVG. The information containedherein is to be used onlyfor thepurpose for which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMTG.

LU1 SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.93.8.17.SATU.A 54.31 (5.43) 24.20 (2.42) tus rogmiimcs 1o ta m is ie 2 4 & m & Zine) 7.3 BODY LIQUID MEASUREMENT F'e"\‘d';el““’ Relative permittivity (6/) Conductivity (0) S/m required measured required measured 150 61.9 25 % 0.80 25 % 300 58.2 25 % 0.92 25 % 450 56.7 25 % 0.94 25 % 750 55.5 45 % 0.96 25 % 835 55.2 25 % 0.97 25 % 900 55.0 25 % 1.05 £5 % 915 5.0 25 % 1.06 25 % 1450 54.0 5 % 1.30 £5 % 1610 53.8 25 % 1.40 £5 % 1800 53.3 25 % 1.52 25 % 1900 53.3 25 % 1.52 45 % 2000 53.3 45 % 15245 % 2100 53.2 25 % 1.62 45 % Page: 911 Thisdocument shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the writien approval ofMVG. The information containedherein isto be used onlyfor thepurpose for which it is submitted and is not to be releasedin whole orpart without written approval ofMTG.

) m SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT B ACB.988 17.BATU—A 2300 52.9 5 % 1.8125% 2450 52.7 25 % PASS 1.95 25 % PASS 2600 52.5 25 % 21645 % 3000 52.0 45 % 27345% 3500 51.3 45 % 3.31 25 % 3700 51.0 45 % 3.55 25 % 5200 49.0210% 530210% 5300 48.9 £10% 5.42210% 5400 48.7£10% 5.53210% 5500 48.6 210 % 5.65 210% 5600 48.5 £10% 5.77 210% 5800 48.2 210 % 6.00 £10 % 7.4 SAR MEASUREMENT RESULT WITH BODY LIQUID Software OPENSAR V4 Phantom SN 20/09 SAM71 Probe SN 18/711 EPG122 Liguid Values Distance between le center and li 10.0 mm Area scan resolution dx—8mm/dy—8mm Zoon Scan Reso! mm/dy—Smm/dz—Smm F 2450 MHz 20 dBm Liguid T 21°C Lab Temy 21 °C Lab Hum 45% T." 18 SAR (Wke/w) 10 & SAR (W/ke/w) measured measured 2450 53.67 (5.37) 24.37 (2.44) momuaes 7 Bc hdadus l N i8 ruxto Fem m 2 e > § ~ £8 . sw R_L] pEspIRFpITEITIZZ Zimel Page: 10/11 Thisdocument shall not be reproduced, except infull or in part, without the writien approval ofMVG. The information containedherein isto be used onlyfor thepurpose for which it is submitted and is not to be releasedin whole orpart without written approval ofMTG.


Document Created: 2018-05-30 01:12:30
Document Modified: 2018-05-30 01:12:30
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC