Attestations

FCC ID: GQ43VT27R

Attestation Statements

Download: PDF
FCCID_134321

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 o# U%.'. D 1 1994 IN REPLY REFER To: 31030 /EQU/4—2—4 1300B4 Mr. Valdis V. Liepa University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory NASA/Center for Space Terahertz Technology 3228 EECS Building Ann Arbor, MI 48109—2122 Dear Mr. Liepa: This is in reply to your facsimile transmission of August 2, 1994, regarding the labelling of a low power communication device that willi be marketed within the U.S. and Canada. You request approval to combine the labels for both countries, permitting a single label to be employed. As indicated, this combined label would read as follows: "This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules and with RSS—210 of the Industry Canada. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation." — According to Section 15.19(a) of our rules, a low power communications device operating under Part 15 must be labelled with the specific statement contained in paragraph ({a) (3). The only difference between the statement required under our rules and your proposed statement is the addition in the first sentence of the phrase "... and with RSS—210 of the Industry Canada." I note that Kwai Lum of Industry Canada, in a facsimile to you on August 3, 1994, has already given permission to use this combined label. I also agree that the use of this combined label, as shown above, is acceptable under our reqgulations. This label conveys the desired information and is essentially identical to our requirement. As expressed by Mr. Lum, text denoting compliance with the standards for both countries was not stated in our rules as "it would be too presumptuous [to assume] that all products are for both markets." I trust that the above responds to your inguiry. Additional questions should be directed to John Reed, 1300B4, at the address on the letterhead or at (202) 653—7313. incerely, %L LLA Richard B. Engelman V Chief, Technical Standards Branch Office of Engineering and Technology

08 /03 /94 U9 : 37 3613 952 5108 1SC/DGEF @001 Government of Canada C Gouvernement du Canada Industry Canada Industrie Canada FACSIMILE SHEET FORMULE D‘ENVOI PAR TELECOPIEUR — —a on me on on on on oy on o— —< — —— an mt ts oi oe ue on ooe o oo <6 e es on on on o oo ooo on ooo an am um am oar m mt w ie on on on on O mn me tee ty hn o on on on s on en ts ue oo oo oo in TO/A: Name/Nom......: Mr Valdis V. Liepa Office/Bureau.: Radiation Lab, University of Michigan,USA Tel. No./No. de tél.: Fax: 3137747—2106 uy mas mas ans ons mas mas es sue sn s on 47e on o tm tee man aee m me ce oa~ —A mm Aun ane ons m ons ons ce mm ce tae uy —s * hoh o m es on hay ce mae our Mn mns mes se e tan ome us ma ant uae 40 F4 C50 Sas mas mae ane oo aap FROM/DE: Name/Nom......: Kwai Lum Manager, Radio Equipment Standards, 300 Slater Street, 13th Floor, Ottawa, Canada, K1A 0OCS8 Phone: 613—990—4699; Fax: 613—952~5108 Total pages : Date & time sent: August 3, 94. Pages totales: 1_ Date & heure envoyé: our_Ref : DGEP—5630—1 (RSS—210 Labelling) This is to respond to your fax of August 1, 94 requesting that we permit a combined statement for FCC and Industry Canada on the equipment labels. We wish to assure you that your suggested combined label that you submitted in your fax is acceptable to Canada since our standard (section 5.8 of RSS—210) allows (to quote) ".....equivalent statement....". We have made our labelling statement as close as we can to Part 15.19(3); the differences are : we left out the word "harmful" because of difficulties in defining what is harmful. We added the phrase "of the device" to remove any possible misunderstanding. To re—capitulate, although your proposed statement uses FCC text except for the mention of "RSS—210 of Industry Canada", we consider it to be equivalent. Our preferred text is per RSS—210; the next best is to add the word "harmful" to meet FCC requirements. Since FCC and Industry Canada are from different countries, we ao not consider it necessary to state in our separate standards a combined text. In any case it would be too presumptuous that all products are for both markets. * Oour equipment certification staff will be informed of the above. We will also copy this to Mr Reed of the FCC since you said that you sent a similar fax to hin. Regards | @N\A Kwai Lunm cc Mr John Reed (FCC OET fax 202—653—8773). cc R. Corey (Equipment Certification) .

Re: Certification for TRW Receiver Door Control PN: 89741-AA020 FCC ID: GQ43VT27R CANADA: to be provided by IC POWER OF ATTORNEY A letter granting Valdis V. Liepa the Power of Attorney is on file and can be provided when so requested.

UnIvEeRrsIty OF MIicHGaNn COLLEGE OF ENCGINEERING THE RADIATION LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE 3228 EECS BUILDING 1301 BEAL AVENUE ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48109—2122 734 764—0500 FAX 734 647—2106 http: //www.eecs.umich.edu/RADLAB/ Re: Certification for TRW Receiver Door Control PN: 89741—AA020 FCC ID: GQA43VT27R CANADA: to be provided by IC REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIALITY Pursuant to 47 CRF 0.459, TRW requests that a part of the subject application be held confidential. This comprises Exhibits (5) Scherfiatics (10) Parts List (Part of Exhibit only) TRW has spent substantial effort in developing this product and it is one of the first of its kind in industry. Having the subject information easily available to "competition" would negate the advantage they have achieved by developing this product. Not protecting the details of the design will definitely result in a financial hardship. If there are any questions regarding this request, please contact me at the above address or call 734—647—1792, (lab) 734—483—4211, fax 734—647—2106 or e—mail liepa@umich.edu. Sincerely, tkPr 4 a@, Valdis V. Liepa Research Scientist University of Michigan

Re: Certification for TRW Receiver Door Control PN: 89741-AA020 FCC ID: GQ43VT27R CANADA: to be provided by IC GENERAL PRODUCT INFORMATION The device, for which certification is pursued, has been designed by: TRW Automotive Electronics Group 24175 Research Drive Farmington Hills, MI 48335-2642 Saad Jabro Tel: 248-442-5187 Fax: 248-478-7241 It will be manufactured by: TRW Automotive Electronics Group 24175 Research Drive Farmington Hills, MI 48335-2642 Saad Jabro Tel: 248-442-5187 Fax: 248-478-7241 It will be marketed and serviced by: TRW

Universtry OF MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING THE RADIATION LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE 3228 EECS BUILDING 1301 BEAL AVENUE ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48109—2122 734 764—0500 FAX 734 647—2106 http: //www.eecs.umich.edu/RADLAB/ January 21, 2001 Re: Certification for TRW Receiver Door Control PN: 89741—AA020 FCC ID: GQ43VT27R CANADA : to be provided by IC STATEMENT OF MODIFICATIONS There were no modifications made to the DUT by this test laboratory. (Also see Section 3.1 of the attached Test Report). /é/cfi M) Valdis V. Liepa Research Scientist D


Document Created: 2001-01-22 11:52:47
Document Modified: 2001-01-22 11:52:47
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC