Test Report

FCC ID: GQ4-73T

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_3741415

Amber Helm Development L.C. 92723 Michigan Hwy-152 Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Tel: 888-847-8027 TRWTX-1702216TX EMC Test Report Issued: January 28, 2018 regarding USA: CFR Title 47, Part 15.231 (Emissions) Canada: ISED RSS-210v9 (Emissions) for 336600 Category: RKE Transmitter Judgements: FCC 15.231, ISED RSS-210v9 Compliant Tested: January 19, 2018 NVLAP LAB CODE 200129-0 Prepared for: TRW Automotive 24175 Research Drive, Farmington Hills Michigan 48335-2642 USA Phone: +1 (248) 699-4487 Fax: +1 (248) 699-4102 Contact: Mark Baker mark.baker@zf.com Data Recorded by: Reviewed by: Gordon Helm, EMC-002401-NE Dave Miller, EMC-003027-NE Prepared by: Date of Issue: January 28, 2018 Dr. Joseph Brunett, EMC-002790-NE A copy of this report will remain on file until January 2028. Page 1 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX Revision History Rev. No. Date Details Revised By r0 January 28, 2018 Initial Release. J. Brunett r1 February 1, 2018 Data Table Corrections. J. Brunett Contents Revision History 2 Table of Contents 2 1 Test Report Scope and Limitations 4 1.1 Laboratory Authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.2 Report Retention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.3 Subcontracted Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.4 Test Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.5 Limitation of Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.6 Copyright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.7 Endorsements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.8 Test Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.9 Traceability and Equipment Used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2 Test Specifications and Procedures 6 2.1 Test Specification and General Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3 Configuration and Identification of the Equipment Under Test 7 3.1 Description and Declarations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1.1 EUT Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1.2 Modes of Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1.3 Variants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1.4 Test Samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1.5 Functional Exerciser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.1.6 Modifications Made . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.1.7 Production Intent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.1.8 Declared Exemptions and Additional Product Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4 Emissions 9 4.1 General Test Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1.1 Radiated Test Setup and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1.2 Conducted Emissions Test Setup and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.1.3 Power Supply Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.2 Intentional Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.2.1 Fundamental Emission Pulsed Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.2.2 Fundamental Emission Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4.2.3 Fundamental Emission Field Strength . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 4.3 Unintentional Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 4.3.1 Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 4.3.2 Radiated Digital Spurious . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 5 Measurement Uncertainty and Accreditation Documents 18 Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 2 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX List of Tables 1 Test Site List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2 Equipment List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3 EUT Declarations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4 Fundamental Emission Pulsed Operation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 5 Fundamental Emission Bandwidth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 6 Fundamental Emission Field Strength. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 7 Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 8 Measurement Uncertainty. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 List of Figures 1 Photos of EUT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2 EUT Test Configuration Diagram. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3 Radiated Emissions Diagram of the EUT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4 Radiated Emissions Test Setup Photograph(s). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5 Fundamental Emission Pulsed Operation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 6 Fundamental Emission Bandwidth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 7 Accreditation Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 3 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX 1 Test Report Scope and Limitations 1.1 Laboratory Authorization Test Facility description and attenuation characteristics are on file with the FCC Laboratory, Columbia, Maryland (FCC Reg. No: 90413) and with ISED Canada, Ottawa, ON (File Ref. No: IC3161). Amber Helm Development L.C. holds accreditation under NVLAP Lab Code 200129-0 and includes within its scope CFR Title 47 Part 15 Subparts B and C. 1.2 Report Retention For equipment verified to comply with the regulations herein, the manufacturer is obliged to retain this report with the product records for the life of the product, and no less than ten years. A copy of this Report will remain on file with this laboratory until January 2028. 1.3 Subcontracted Testing This report does not contain data produced under subcontract. 1.4 Test Data This test report contains data included within the laboratories scope of accreditation. 1.5 Limitation of Results The test results contained in this report relate only to the item(s) tested. Any electrical or mechanical modification made to the test item subsequent to the test date shall invalidate the data presented in this report. Any electrical or mechanical modification made to the test item subsequent to this test date shall require reevaluation. 1.6 Copyright This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Amber Helm Development L.C.. 1.7 Endorsements This report shall not be used to claim product endorsement by any accrediting, regulatory, or governmental agency. Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 4 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX 1.8 Test Location The EUT was fully tested by Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michi- gan 49047 USA. Table 1 lists all sites employed herein. Specific test sites utilized are also listed in the test results sections of this report. Table 1: Test Site List. Description Location Quality Num. OATS (3m & 10m) 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA OATSA 1.9 Traceability and Equipment Used Pertinent test equipment used for measurements at this facility is listed in Table 2. The quality system employed at Amber Helm Development L.C. has been established to ensure all equipment has a clearly identifiable classification, calibration expiry date, and that all calibrations are traceable to the SI through NIST, other recognized national laboratories, accepted fundamental or natural physical constants, ratio type of calibration, or by comparison to consensus standards. Table 2: Equipment List. Description Manufacturer/Model SN Quality Num. Last Cal By / Date Due BiconiLog Antenna EMCO / 3142 1169 BILO3142 Lib.Labs / May-2018 (3m) RG8 Coax CS-3227 / CS-3227 C060914 CS3227 AHD / Mar-2018 3704A00422, EMI Receiver HP / 85460A/85462A HP8546A Techmaster / Apr-2018 3807A00465 Spectrum Analyzer Rohde & Schwarz / FSV30 101660 RSFSV30001 RS / May-2018 (3m) LMR-400 Coax AHD / LMR400 C090804 LMR400 AHD / Mar-2018 (LCI) DS Coax AHD / RG58/U 920809 RG58U AHD / Jul-2018 (10-m) Amelco Coax AHD / RG213U 9903-10ab RG213U AHD / Mar-2018 Double Ridged Horn EMCO / 3115 2788 RH3115 Lib.Labs. / July-2018 Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 5 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX 2 Test Specifications and Procedures 2.1 Test Specification and General Procedures The ultimate goal of TRW Automotive is to demonstrate that the Equipment Under Test (EUT) complies with the Rules and/or Directives below. Detailed in this report are the results of testing the TRW Automotive 336600 for compliance to: Country/Region Rules or Directive Referenced Section(s) United States Code of Federal Regulations CFR Title 47, Part 15.231 Canada ISED Canada ISED RSS-210v9 It has been determined that the equipment under test is subject to the rules and directives above at the date of this testing. In conjunction with these rules and directives, the following specifications and procedures are followed herein to demonstrate compliance (in whole or in part) with these regulations. ”Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage Electri- ANSI C63.4:2014 cal and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz” ”American National Standard of Procedures for Compliance Testing of Unli- ANSI C63.10:2013 (USA) censed Wireless Devices” TP0102RA ”AHD Internal Document TP0102 - Radiated Emissions Test Procedure” ISED Canada ”The Measurement of Occupied Bandwidth” “Information Technology Equipment (ITE) Limits and methods of measure- ICES-003; Issue 6 (2016) men” Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 6 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX 3 Configuration and Identification of the Equipment Under Test 3.1 Description and Declarations The equipment under test is a remote keyless entry transmitter. The EUT is approximately 4 x 2.5 x 1.5 cm (approx) in dimension, and is depicted in Figure 1. It is powered by 3 VDC lithium coin cell. In use, this device is hand held. Table 3 outlines provider declared EUT specifications. Figure 1: Photos of EUT. Table 3: EUT Declarations. General Declarations Equipment Type: RKE Transmitter Country of Origin: Not Declared Nominal Supply: 3 VDC Oper. Temp Range: Not Declared Frequency Range: 312.1 and 314.35 MHz Antenna Dimension: Not Declared Antenna Type: Integral Antenna Gain: Not Declared Number of Channels: 2 Channel Spacing: Not Declared Alignment Range: Not Declared Type of Modulation: FSK United States FCC ID Number: GQ4-73T Classification: DSC Canada Remote Control Device, Ve- IC Number: 1470A-54T Classification: hicular Device 3.1.1 EUT Configuration The EUT is configured for testing as depicted in Figure 2. 3.1.2 Modes of Operation The EUT employs only a single mode of operation, as a manually activated transmitter. Upon single button press, the EUT will transmit one 716 ms FSK frame on one of two RF channels. Only a single channel is employed with a single button press, and the EUT switches channels between presses. 3.1.3 Variants There is only a single variant of the EUT, as tested. 3.1.4 Test Samples Two normal operating samples were provided for testing. Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 7 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX TRW RKE Transmitter Model: 336600 FCC ID: GQ4-73T IC: 1470A-54T Figure 2: EUT Test Configuration Diagram. 3.1.5 Functional Exerciser Normal operating EUT functionality was verified by observation of transmitted signal. 3.1.6 Modifications Made There were no modifications made to the EUT by this laboratory. 3.1.7 Production Intent The EUT appears to be a production ready sample. 3.1.8 Declared Exemptions and Additional Product Notes None. Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 8 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX 4 Emissions 4.1 General Test Procedures 4.1.1 Radiated Test Setup and Procedures Radiated electromagnetic emissions from the EUT are first pre-scanned in our screen room. Spectrum and modulation characteristics of all emissions are recorded. Instrumentation, including spectrum analyzers and other test equipment as detailed in Section 1.8 are employed. After pre-scan, emission measurements are made on the test site of record. If the EUT connects to auxiliary equipment and is table or floor standing, the configurations prescribed in relevant test standards are followed. Alternatively, a layout closest to normal use (as declared by the provider) is employed if the resulting emissions appear to be worst-case in such a configuration. See Figure 3. All intentionally radiating elements that are not fixed-mounted in use are placed on the test table lying flat, on their side, and on their end (3-axes) and the resulting worst case emissions are recorded. If the EUT is fixed-mounted in use, measurements are made with the device oriented in the manner consistent with installation and then emissions are recorded. If the EUT exhibits spurious emissions due to internal receiver circuitry, such emissions are measured with an appropriate carrier signal applied. Long Interface Cables EUT Power Long Interface Cables (to AUX) AUX Power (to EUT) Equipment Under Test Auxiliary (EUT) Short Interface Cables Equipment (AUX) Radiated Emissions Table Figure 3: Radiated Emissions Diagram of the EUT. For devices with intentional emissions below 30 MHz, a shielded loop antenna and/or E-field and H-Field broad- band probes are used depending on the regulations. Shielded loops are placed at a 1 meter receive height at the desired measurement distance. For exposure in this band, the broadband probes employed are 10cm diameter single-axis shielded transducers and measurements are repeated and summed over three axes. Emissions between 30 MHz and 1 GHz are measured using calibrated broadband antennas. For both horizontal and vertical polarizations, the test antenna is raised and lowered from 1 to 4 m in height until a maximum emission level is detected. The EUT is then rotated through 360o in azimuth until the highest emission is detected. The test antenna is then raised and lowered one last time from 1 to 4 m and the worst case value is recorded. Emissions above 1 GHz are characterized using standard gain or broadband ridge-horn antennas on our OATS with a 4 × 5 m rectangle of ECCOSORB absorber covering the OATS ground screen and a 1.5m table height. Care is taken to ensure that test receiver resolution and video bandwidths meet the regulatory requirements, and that the emission bandwidth of the EUT is not reduced. Photographs of the test setup employed are depicted in Figure 4. Where regulations allow for direct measurement of field strength, power values (dBm) measured on the test receiver / analyzer are converted to dBµV/m at the regulatory distance, using Edist = 107 + PR + KA − KG + KE − CF where PR is the power recorded on spectrum analyzer, in dBm, KA is the test antenna factor in dB/m, KG is the combined pre-amplifier gain and cable loss in dB, KE is duty correction factor (when applicable) in dB, and CF is a distance conversion (employed only if limits are specified at alternate distance) in dB. This field strength value is then compared with the regulatory limit. If effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) is computed, it is computed as EIRP (dBm) = E3m (dBµV /m) − 95.2. Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 9 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX When presenting data at each frequency, the highest measured emission under all possible EUT orientations (3-axes) is reported. Figure 4: Radiated Emissions Test Setup Photograph(s). Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 10 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX 4.1.2 Conducted Emissions Test Setup and Procedures Battery Power Conducted Spurious The EUT is not subject to measurement of power line conducted emissions as it is powered solely by its internal battery. 4.1.3 Power Supply Variation Tests at extreme supply voltages are made if required by the the procedures specified in the test standard, and results of this testing are detailed in this report. In the case the EUT is designed for operation from a battery power source, the extreme test voltages are evaluated over the range specified in the test standard; no less than ±10% of the nominal battery voltage declared by the manufacturer. For all battery operated equipment, worst case intentional and spurious emissions are re-checked employing a new (fully charged) battery. Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 11 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX 4.2 Intentional Emissions 4.2.1 Fundamental Emission Pulsed Operation Test Setup & Procedure The test equipment and facilities were setup in accordance with the standards and procedures listed in Section 2.1. Environmental conditions were set at the appropriate temperature and thermal balance was checked with a thermocouple based probe. Duty cycle is reported for all relevant modes of operation. The test equipment employed includes RSFSV30001, BILOG3142. Measurement Results The details and results of testing the EUT are summarized in Table 4. Plots showing the measurements made to obtain these values are provided in Figure 5. Table 4: Fundamental Emission Pulsed Operation. Test Date: 20-Jan-18 Detector Span IF Bandwidth Video Bandwidth Test Engineer: Joseph Brunett Pk 0 1 MHz 3 MHz EUT: TRW Toy Tx EUT Mode: Modulated Meas. Distance: 10 cm FCC/IC Overall Transmission Internal Frame Characteristics Computed Duty Min. Max. Total Cycle Repetition No. of Transmission Max. Frame Min. Frame # Frequency EUT Test Mode* Rate (sec) Frames Length (sec) Length (ms) Period (ms) Frame Encoding (%) (dB) The EUT transmits a single 716 ms long 1 312.1 MHz Manual Activation single 1 0.716 716.000 - 100.0 0.0 frame of FSK encoded data. The EUT transmits a single 716 ms long 2 314.35 MHz Manual Activation single 1 0.716 716.000 - 100.0 0.0 frame of FSK encoded data. Example Calculation: Worst Case 315 FSK Duty (%) = 100ms / 100 ms x 100 = 100 % Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 12 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX Figure 5: Fundamental Emission Pulsed Operation. Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 13 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX 4.2.2 Fundamental Emission Bandwidth Test Setup & Procedure The test equipment and facilities were setup in accordance with the standards and procedures listed in Section 2.1. Environmental conditions were set at the appropriate temperature and thermal balance was checked with a thermocouple based probe. Emission bandwidth (EBW) of the EUT is measured with the device placed in the test mode(s) with the shortest available frame length and minimum frame spacing. The 20 dB EBW is measured as the max-held peak-detected signal when the IF bandwidth is greater than or equal to 1% of the receiver span. For complex modulations other than ASK and FSK, the 99% emission bandwidth per IC test procedures has a different result, and is also reported. The test equipment employed includes RSFSV30001, BILOG3142. Measurement Results The details and results of testing the EUT are summarized in Table 5. Plots showing the measurements made to obtain these values are provided in Figure 6. Table 5: Fundamental Emission Bandwidth. Test Date: 20-Jan-18 Detector IF Bandwidth Video Bandwidth Test Engineer: Joseph Brunett Pk 10 kHz 30 kHz EUT: TRW Toy Tx EUT Mode: Modulated Meas. Distance: 10 cm FCC/IC Center Frequency 20 dB EBW EBW Limit 99% OBW # Modulation (MHz) (MHz) (MHz) (MHz) 1 FSK 312.10 0.110 0.7803 0.119 2 FSK 314.35 0.111 0.785875 0.118 Figure 6: Fundamental Emission Bandwidth. Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 14 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX 4.2.3 Fundamental Emission Field Strength Test Setup & Procedure The test equipment and facilities were setup in accordance with the standards and procedures listed in Section 2.1. Environmental conditions were set at the appropriate temperature and thermal balance was checked with a thermocouple based probe. Fundamental emissions are measured at the regulatory distance on our OATS. The test equipment employed includes HP8546A, BILOG3142. Measurement Results The details and results of testing the EUT are summarized in Table 6. Table 6: Fundamental Emission Field Strength. Frequency Range Det IF Bandwidth Video Bandwidth Test Date: 19-Jan-18 25 MHz ≤ f ≤ 1 000 MHz Pk/QPk 120 kHz 300 kHz Test Engineer: Gordon Helm f > 1 000 MHz Pk 1 MHz 3 MHz EUT: TRW Toy Tx f > 1 000 MHz Avg 1 MHz 10 kHz EUT Mode: CW Meas. Distance: 3 meters FCC/IC Freq. Ant. Ant. Table Azim. Ant Height Ka Kg E3(Pk)** E3(Avg)* FCC/IC E3(Pk) FCC/IC E3(Avg) Pass # MHz Used Pol. deg m dB/m dB dBµV/m dBµV/m Lim. dBµV/m Lim. dBµV/m dB Comments 1 312.1 BILO3142 H 160.0 1.3 17.3 -1.2 71.9 71.9 95.4 75.4 3.5 side (key in) 1 312.1 BILO3142 H 160.0 1.3 17.3 -1.2 71.9 71.9 95.4 75.4 3.5 side (key out) 2 312.1 BILO3142 V 240.0 1.8 17.3 -1.2 69.4 69.4 95.4 75.4 6.0 end (key in) 3 314.4 BILO3142 H 160.0 1.3 17.3 -1.2 70.5 70.5 95.4 75.4 4.9 side (key in) 4 314.4 BILO3142 V 240.0 1.8 17.3 -1.2 68.0 68.0 95.4 75.4 7.4 end (key in) *Avg data computed from Peak Measured Data and EUT Duty Cycle. EUT in CW mode. Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 15 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX 4.3 Unintentional Emissions 4.3.1 Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions Test Setup & Procedure The test equipment and facilities were setup in accordance with the standards and procedures listed in Section 2.1. Environmental conditions were set at the appropriate temperature and thermal balance was checked with a thermocouple based probe. Spurious radiated emissions measurements are performed to 10 times the highest fundamental operating frequency. The test equipment employed includes HP8546A, BILOG3142, RH3115. Measurement Results The details and results of testing the EUT are summarized in Table 7. Table 7: Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions. Frequency Range Det IF Bandwidth Video Bandwidth Test Date: 19-Jan-18 25 MHz ≤ f ≤ 1 000 MHz Pk/QPk 120 kHz 300 kHz Test Engineer: Gordon Helm f > 1 000 MHz Pk/Avg 1 MHz 3 MHz EUT: TRW Toy Tx EUT Mode: CW Meas. Distance: 3 meters Transmitter Unintentional Spurious Emissions FCC/IC Freq. Ant. Ant. Table Azim. Ant Height Ka Kg E3(Pk)** E3(Avg) FCC/IC E3lim (Pk) FCC/IC E3lim (Avg) Pass # MHz Used Pol. deg m dB/m dB dBµV/m dBµV/m dBµV/m dBµV/m dB Comments 1 624.2 BILO3142 H 180.0 1.1 19.9 -2.1 26.7 26.7 75.4 55.4 28.7 max all 2 624.2 BILO3142 V 240.0 1.9 19.9 -2.1 27.4 27.4 75.4 55.4 28.0 max all 3 936.3 BILO3142 H 350.0 1.7 25.2 -2.9 31.5 31.5 75.4 55.4 23.9 max all 4 936.3 BILO3142 V 80.0 1.1 25.2 -2.9 29.9 29.9 75.4 55.4 25.5 max all 5 1248.4 RH3115 H/V 20.0 1.3 26.6 -1.4 37.0 37.0 75.4 55.4 18.4 max all 6 1560.5 RH3115 H/V 90.0 2.1 27.2 -1.7 40.0 40.0 75.4 55.4 15.4 max all 7 1872.6 RH3115 H/V 180.0 1.5 27.8 -2.0 37.0 37.0 75.4 55.4 18.4 max all 8 2184.7 RH3115 H/V 180.0 1.0 28.3 -2.2 42.0 42.0 75.4 55.4 13.4 max all 9 2496.8 RH3115 H/V 90.0 1.8 28.7 -2.4 44.0 44.0 75.4 55.4 11.4 max all, noise 10 2808.9 RH3115 H/V 270.0 1.8 29.1 -2.6 43.0 43.0 75.4 55.4 12.4 max all, noise 11 3121.0 RH3115 H/V 270.0 1.8 29.4 -2.8 42.0 42.0 75.4 55.4 13.4 max all, noise 12 13 628.7 BILO3142 H 180.0 1.1 20.0 -2.1 26.7 26.7 75.4 55.4 28.7 max all 14 628.7 BILO3142 V 240.0 1.9 20.0 -2.1 24.7 24.7 75.4 55.4 30.7 max all 15 943.1 BILO3142 H 350.0 1.7 25.1 -3.0 31.5 31.5 75.4 55.4 23.9 max all 16 943.1 BILO3142 V 80.0 1.1 25.1 -3.0 29.9 29.9 75.4 55.4 25.5 max all 17 1257.4 RH3115 H/V 20.0 1.3 26.6 -1.5 37.0 37.0 75.4 55.4 18.4 max all 18 1571.8 RH3115 H/V 90.0 2.1 27.2 -1.7 40.0 40.0 75.4 55.4 15.4 max all 19 1886.1 RH3115 H/V 180.0 1.5 27.8 -2.0 37.0 37.0 75.4 55.4 18.4 max all 20 2200.5 RH3115 H/V 180.0 1.0 28.3 -2.2 42.0 42.0 75.4 55.4 13.4 max all 21 2514.8 RH3115 H/V 90.0 1.8 28.7 -2.4 44.0 44.0 75.4 55.4 11.4 max all, noise 22 2829.2 RH3115 H/V 270.0 1.8 29.1 -2.6 43.0 43.0 75.4 55.4 12.4 max all, noise 23 3143.5 RH3115 H/V 270.0 1.8 29.4 -2.8 42.0 42.0 75.4 55.4 13.4 max all, noise *Avg data computed from Peak Measured Data and EUT Duty Cycle. EUT in CW mode. Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 16 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX 4.3.2 Radiated Digital Spurious The results for the measurement of digital spurious emissions are not reported herein as all digital emissions were greater than 20 dB below the regulatory limit. Radiation from digital components was measured to 4 GHz, or to five times the maximum digital component operating frequency, whichever is greater. Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 17 of 18

Date: January 28, 2018 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Report No.: TRWTX-1702216TX 5 Measurement Uncertainty and Accreditation Documents The maximum values of measurement uncertainty for the laboratory test equipment and facilities associated with each test are given in the table below. This uncertainty is computed for a 95.45% confidence level based on a coverage factor of k = 2. Table 8: Measurement Uncertainty. Measured Parameter Measurement Uncertainty† 7 Radio Frequency ±(fM kr /10 + RBW/10 + (SP N/(P T S − 1))/2 + 1 Hz) Conducted Emm. Amplitude ±1.9 dB Radiated Emm. Amplitude (30 − 200 MHz) ±4.0 dB Radiated Emm. Amplitude (200 − 1000 MHz) ±5.2 dB Radiated Emm. Amplitude (f > 1000 MHz) ±3.7 dB † Ref: CISPR 16-4-2:2011+A1:2014 Figure 7: Accreditation Documents Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Page 18 of 18


Document Created: 2018-02-05 07:22:21
Document Modified: 2018-02-05 07:22:21
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC