Comments 2

FCC ID: GM37525BTB

Cover Letter(s)

Download: PDF
FCCID_775625

                   American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc.
                                    6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101


March 26, 2007

RE:               Pison Teklogix Inc.

FCC ID:           GM37525BTB


After a review of the submitted information, I have a few comments on the above referenced
Application.


      1) Please provide appropriate RF exposure information for documentation of the co-location
         configurations as requested in this application (i.e. copies of the SAR reports for co-location
         with the WLAN and WAN). Note that it is my understanding that these results are under
         review for the associated co-located transmitter(s) application and there are comments
         regarding the positioning of the units for SAR. Once these comments have been resolved,
         please provide the latest RF exposure information, as well as copies of the RF exposure
         related questions/response for documentation of this application as appropriate.
      2) There appears to be as many as 7 or more different style heads (laser scanners) for use in the
         host this is being approved in. How are these factored into both EMC and SAR testing? Note
         that for EMC this is a limited modular approval so emissions are measured based on the
         whole device despite the modular nature of the approval including ERP, EIRP and spurious
         emissions. Additionally, for SAR, the device must consider all electrical and metallic changes.
         Please review.
      3) Your response mentions that the this application is not to cover co-location with the WLAN
         device. Please note that sample labeling clearly shows identification of 3 modules together
         (i.e. BT + WLAN + GSM). Labeling must not reflect this if this application is not covering this
         configuration. Additionally test reports also show presence of a WLAN card. Note this
         assumes the device is co-located for RF exposure concerns. If it is not able to TX at the same
         time as the WLAN then for RF exposure it may not be co-location. If it does transmit at the
         same time, due to power levels of WAN and WLAN exceed TCB allowances. However in this
         case detailed explanation of this and how compliance with 15.15 is assured must be provided.
         Please explain.




Timothy R. Johnson
Examining Engineer

mailto: tjohnson@AmericanTCB.com

The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced
application.     Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination.
Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the
Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued.

Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be
processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also,
please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted.

Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.



Document Created: 2007-03-26 23:47:57
Document Modified: 2007-03-26 23:47:57

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC