coloc SAR Report for FCC ID HN2SB555 2

FCC ID: EHABTS080

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_460767

in accordance with the requirements of FCC Report and Order: ET Docket 93-62, and OET Bulletin 65 Supplement C For (Class II Permissive Change) Handheld Voice/Data Terminal with Dual-Band CDMA Modem, DSSS Wireless LAN Card, & Bluetooth Module MODEL: 700C FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 May 26, 2004 REPORT NO: 04U2716-1A Prepared for 550 SECOND ST. SE CEDAR RAPIDS IA 52401-2023, USA Prepared by COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES 561F MONTEREY ROAD MORGAN HILL, CA 95037 USA TEL: (408) 463-0885

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (SAR EVALUATION) DATES OF TEST: May 25-26, 2004 APPLICANT: Intermec Technologies Corporation 550 SECOND ST. SE CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52401-2023, USA MODEL: 700C FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 DEVICE CATEGORY: PORTABLE DEVICES EXPOSURE CATEGORY: GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE Application Type: Class II Permissive Change New Bluetooth radio card (FCC ID: EHABTS080) Tx Frequency: 1850 to 1910 MHz for CDMA PCS band 824.0 to 849.0 MHz for CDMA Cellular Band 2412 to 2462 MHz for 802.11b; 2402 to 2480 MHz for Bluetooth Max. SAR (1g): • CDMA PCS Band Head - Tilted position 0.673 mW/g; 0.638 mW/g (Co-location) Body - Right side 0.983 mW/g; 0.972 mW/g (Co-location) • CDMA Cellular Band Head - Tilted position 0.193 mW/g; 0.183 mW/g (Co-location) Body - Back side 0.283 mW/g; 0.289 mW/g (Co-location) FCC Rule Part(s): 24 E for CDMA PCS Band (1850 to 1910 MHz); 22 H for CDMA Cellular Band (824.0 to 849.0 MHz) Antenna Type: External Stubby, • P/N: 805-606-204 for CDMA PCS Band; • P/N: 805-606-102 for CDMA PCS & Cellular Band This wireless portable device has been shown to be capable of compliance for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) for uncontrolled environment/general population exposure limits specified in ANSI/IEEE Std. C95.1-1992 and had been tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in FCC OET 65 Supplement C (released on 6/29/2001 see Test Report). I attest to the accuracy of data. All measurements reported herein were performed by me or were made under my supervision and are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I assume full responsibility for the completeness of these measurements and vouch for the qualifications of all persons taking them. Hsin-Fu Shih (Sunny Shih) Senior Engineer COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 2 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DESCRIPTION ........................................................... 4 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING DEFINED BY THE FCC ............................... 4 3. DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SYSTEM .......................................................................... 4 3.1. MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM ......................................................................................................5 3.2. SYSTEM COMPONENTS .......................................................................................................................6 4. EVALUATION PROCEDURES ..................................................................................... 8 5. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ............................................................................... 12 6. EXPOSURE LIMIT ................................................................................................. 13 7. MEASUREMENT RESULTS ...................................................................................... 14 7.1. SIMULATING LIQUIDS PARAMETER CHECK ..........................................................................................14 7.2. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK ........................................................................................................19 7.3. SAR MEASUREMENTS RESULTS .......................................................................................................21 8. EUT PHOTOS ...................................................................................................... 25 9. EQUIPMENT LIST & CALIBRATION STATUS ............................................................... 28 10. REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 29 11. ATTACHMENTS .................................................................................................... 30 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 3 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 1. EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DESCRIPTION Type of EUT: Handheld Voice/Data Terminal with Dual-Band CDMA Modem, DSSS Wireless LAN Card (802.11b), & Bluetooth Module. Radio module FCC ID Dual-Band CDMA Modem HN2SB555-2 Wireless LAN Card (802.11b) HN22011B-2 Bluetooth Module EHABTS080 Co-located transmitter operating configurations with optional Bluetooth radio card has been evaluated as described in this report. Battery: 7.2V Lithium-Ion (P/N: 318-013-001) 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING DEFINED BY THE FCC The US Federal Communications Commission has released the report and order “Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of RF Radiation", ET Docket No. 93-62 in August 1996 [1]. The order requires routine SAR evaluation prior to equipment authorization of portable transmitter devices, including portable telephones. For consumer products, the applicable limit is 1.6 mW/g for an uncontrolled environment and 8.0 mW/g for an occupational/controlled environment as recommended by the ANSI/IEEE standard C95.1-1992 [6]. According to the Supplement C of OET Bulletin 65 “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guide-lines for Human Exposure to Radio frequency Electromagnetic Fields", released on Jun 29, 2001 by the FCC, the device should be evaluated at maximum output power (radiated from the antenna) under “worst-case” conditions for normal or intended use, incorporating normal antenna operating positions, device peak performance frequencies and positions for maximum RF energy coupling. 3. DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SYSTEM These measurements were performed with the automated near-field scanning system DASY4 from Schmid & Partner Engineering AG (SPEAG). The system is based on a high precision robot (working range greater than 0.9 m) which positions the probes with a positional repeatability of better than ± 0.02 mm. Special E- and H-field probes have been developed for measurements close to material discontinuity, the sensors of which are directly loaded with a Schottky diode and connected via highly resistive lines to the data acquisition unit. The SAR measurements were conducted with the dosimetric probe ES3DV2-SN: 3021 (manufactured by SPEAG), designed in the classical triangular configuration and optimized for dosimetric evaluation. The probe has been calibrated according to the procedure with accuracy of better than ±10%. The spherical isotropy was evaluated with the procedure and found to be better than ±0.25 dB. The phantom used was the SAM Twin Phantom as described in FCC supplement C, IEEE P1528 and EN50361. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 4 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 3.1. MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM The DASY4 system for performing compliance tests consists of the following items: • A standard high precision 6-axis robot (St¨aubli RX family) with controller, teach pendant and software. An arm extension for accommodating the data acquisition electronics (DAE). • A dosimetric probe, i.e., an isotropic E-field probe optimized and calibrated for usage in tissue simulating liquid. The probe is equipped with an optical surface detector system. • A data acquisition electronics (DAE) which performs the signal amplification, signal multiplexing, AD-conversion, offset measurements, mechanical surface detection, collision detection, etc. The unit is battery powered with standard or rechargeable batteries. The signal is optically transmitted to the EOC. • The Electro-optical converter (EOC) performs the conversion between optical and electrical of the signals for the digital communication to the DAE and for the analog signal from the optical surface detection. The EOC is connected to the measurement server. • The function of the measurement server is to perform the time critical tasks such as signal filtering, control of the robot operation and fast movement interrupts. • A probe alignment unit which improves the (absolute) accuracy of the probe positioning. • A computer operating Windows 2000 or Windows XP. • DASY4 software. • Remote control with teach pendant and additional circuitry for robot safety such as warning lamps, etc. • The SAM twin phantom enabling testing left-hand and right-hand usage. • The device holder for handheld mobile phones. • Tissue simulating liquid mixed according to the given recipes. • Validation dipole kits allowing validating the proper functioning of the system. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 5 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 3.2. SYSTEM COMPONENTS DASY4 MEASUREMENT SERVER The DASY4 measurement server is based on a PC/104 CPU board with a 166MHz low-power Pentium, 32MB chip disk and 64MB RAM. The necessary circuits for communication with either the DAE3 electronic box as well as the 16-bit AD-converter system for optical detection and digital I/O interface are contained on the DASY4 I/O-board, which is directly connected to the PC/104 bus of the CPU board. The measurement server performs all real-time data evaluation for field measurements and surface detection, controls robot movements and handles safety operation. The PC-operating system cannot interfere with these time critical processes. All connections are supervised by a watchdog, and disconnection of any of the cables to the measurement server will automatically disarm the robot and disable all program-controlled robot movements. Furthermore, the measurement server is equipped with two expansion slots which are reserved for future applications. Please note that the expansion slots do not have a standardized pinout and therefore only the expansion cards provided by SPEAG can be inserted. Expansion cards from any other supplier could seriously damage the measurement server. Calibration: No calibration required. DATA ACQUISITION ELECTRONICS (DAE) The data acquisition electronics (DAE3) consists of a highly sensitive electrometer grade preamplifier with auto-zeroing, a channel and gain-switching multiplexer, a fast 16 bit AD converter and a command decoder and control logic unit. Transmission to the measurement server is accomplished through an optical downlink for data and status information as well as an optical uplink for commands and the clock. The mechanical probe mounting device includes two different sensor systems for frontal and sideways probe contacts. They are used for mechanical surface detection and probe collision detection. The input impedance of the DAE3 box is 200MOhm; the inputs are symmetrical and floating. Common mode rejection is above 80 dB. ES3DV2 ISOTROPIC E-FIELD PROBE FOR DOSIMETRIC MEASUREMENTS Construction: Symmetrical design with triangular core Interleaved sensors Built-in shielding against static charges PEEK enclosure material (resistant to organic solvents, e.g., glycolether) Calibration: Basic Broad Band Calibration in air: 10-2500 MHz. Conversion Factors (CF) for HSL 900 and HSL 1800 CF-Calibration for other liquids and frequencies upon request. Frequency: 10 MHz to > 6 GHz; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB Directivity: ± 0.2 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis); ± 0.3 dB in tissue material (rotation normal to probe axis) Dynamic Range: 5 µW/g to > 100 mW/g; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB Dimensions: Overall length: 330 mm (Tip: 20 mm) Tip diameter: 3.9 mm (Body: 12 mm) Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7 mm Application: General dosimetry up to 6 GHz Dosimetry in strong gradient fields Compliance tests of mobile phones Interior of probe Isotropic E-Field Probe COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 6 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 SAM PHANTOM (V4.0) Construction: The shell corresponds to the specifications of the Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM) phantom defined in IEEE 1528-200X, CENELEC 50361 and IEC 62209. It enables the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand phone usage as well as body mounted usage at the flat phantom region. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow the complete setup of all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids by manually teaching three points with the robot. Shell Thickness: 2 ±0.2 mm Filling Volume: Approx. 25 liters Dimensions: Height: 810mm; Length: 1000mm; Width: 500mm DEVICE HOLDER FOR SAM TWIN PHANTOM Construction: In combination with the Twin SAM Phantom V4.0 or Twin SAM, the Mounting Device (made from POM) enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter in spherical coordinates, whereby the rotation point is the ear opening. The devices can be easily and accurately positioned according to IEC, IEEE, CENELEC, FCC or other specifications. The device holder can be locked at different phantom locations (left head, right head, flat phantom). SYSTEM VALIDATION KITS Construction: Symmetrical dipole with l/4 balun Enables measurement of feedpoint impedance with NWA Matched for use near flat phantoms filled with brain simulating solutions Includes distance holder and tripod adaptor. Frequency: 450, 900, 1800, 2450, 5800 MHz Return loss: > 20 dB at specified validation position Power capability: > 100 W (f < 1GHz); > 40 W (f > 1GHz) Dimensions: 450V2: dipole length: 270 mm; overall height: 330 mm D900V2: dipole length: 149 mm; overall height: 330 mm D1800V2: dipole length: 72 mm; overall height: 300 mm D2450V2: dipole length: 51.5 mm; overall height: 300 mm D5GHzV2: dipole length: 25.5 mm; overall height: 290 mm COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 7 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 4. EVALUATION PROCEDURES DATA EVALUATION The DASY4 post processing software (SEMCAD) automatically executes the following procedures to calculate the field units from the microvolt readings at the probe connector. The parameters used in the evaluation are stored in the configuration modules of the software: Probe parameters: - Sensitivity Normi, ai0, ai1, ai2 - Conversion factor ConvFi - Diode compression point dcpi Device parameters: - Frequency f - Crest factor cf Media parameters: - Conductivity σ - Density ρ These parameters must be set correctly in the software. They can be found in the component documents or be imported into the software from the configuration files issued for the DASY components. In the direct measuring mode of the multi-meter option, the parameters of the actual system setup are used. In the scan visualization and export modes, the parameters stored in the corresponding document files are used. The first step of the evaluation is a linearization of the filtered input signal to account for the compression characteristics of the detector diode. The compensation depends on the input signal, the diode type and the DC-transmission factor from the diode to the evaluation electronics. If the exciting field is pulsed, the crest factor of the signal must be known to correctly compensate for peak power. The formula for each channel can be given as: 2 cf V =U +U i i i ⋅ dcp i with Vi = Compensated signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) Ui = Input signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) cf = Crest factor of exciting field (DASY parameter) dcpi = Diode compression point (DASY parameter) From the compensated input signals the primary field data for each channel can be evaluated: E-field probes: V E = i i Norm • ConvF i 2 H-field probes: a +a f +a f i10 i11 i12 H i = Vi ⋅ f with Vi = Compensated signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) Normi = Sensor sensitivity of channel i (i = x, y, z) µV/(V/m)2 for E0field Probes ConvF = Sensitivity enhancement in solution aij = Sensor sensitivity factors for H-field probes f = Carrier frequency (GHz) Ei = Electric field strength of channel i in V/m Hi = Magnetic field strength of channel i in A/m COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 8 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 The RSS value of the field components gives the total field strength (Hermitian magnitude): 2 2 2 E tot = E +E +E x y z The primary field data are used to calculate the derived field units. 2 σ SAR = E ⋅ tot ρ ⋅1000 with SAR = local specific absorption rate in mW/g Etot = total field strength in V/m σ = conductivity in [mho/m] or [Siemens/m] ρ = equivalent tissue density in g/cm3 Note that the density is normally set to 1 (or 1.06), to account for actual brain density rather than the density of the simulation liquid. The power flow density is calculated assuming the excitation field as a free space field. 2 E or P 2 = H tot ⋅ 37.7 P = tot pwe pwe 3770 with Ppwe = Equivalent power density of a plane wave in mW/cm2 Etot = total electric field strength in V/m Htot = total magnetic field strength in A/m COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 9 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 SAR SYSTEM MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES The procedure for assessing the peak spatial-average SAR value consists of the following steps: • Power Reference Measurement The reference and drift jobs are useful jobs for monitoring the power drift of the device under test in the batch process. Both jobs measure the field at a specified reference position, at a selectable distance from the phantom surface. The reference position can be either the selected section’s grid reference point or a user point in this section. The reference job projects the selected point onto the phantom surface, orients the probe perpendicularly to the surface, and approaches the surface using the selected detection method. • Area Scan The area scan is used as a fast scan in two dimensions to find the area of high field values, before doing a finer measurement around the hot spot. The sophisticated interpolation routines implemented in DASY4 software can find the maximum locations even in relatively coarse grids. This grid is anchored at the grid reference point of the selected section in the phantom. When the area scan’s property sheet is brought-up, grid settings can be edited by a user. When an area scan has measured all reachable points, it computes the field maximum found in the scanned area, within a range of the global maximum. If only one Zoom Scan follows the Area Scan, then only the absolute maximum will be taken as reference. For cases where multiple maximums are detected, the number of Zoom Scans has to be increased accordingly. • Zoom Scan Zoom scans are used to assess the peak spatial SAR values within a cubic averaging volume containing 1 g and 10 g of simulated tissue. The default zoom scan measures 5 x 5 x 7 points within a cube whose base faces are centered around the maximum found in a preceding area scan job within the same procedure. If the preceding Area Scan job indicates more then one maximum, the number of Zoom Scans has to be enlarged accordingly. For dosimetric application, it is necessary to assess the peak spatial SAR value averaged over a volume. For this purpose, fine resolution volume scans need to be performed at the peak SAR location(s) determined during the Area Scan. • Power Drift measurement The drift job measures the field at the same location as the most recent reference job within the same procedure, and with the same settings. The drift measurement gives the field difference in dB from the reading conducted within the last reference measurement. Several drift measurements are possible for one reference measurement. This allows a user to monitor the power drift of the device under test within a batch process. In the properties of the Drift job, the user can specify a limit for the drift and have DASY4 software stop the measurements if this limit is exceeded. • Z-Scan The Z Scan job measures points along a vertical straight line. The line runs along the Z-axis of a one- dimensional grid. A user can anchor the grid to the current probe location. As with any other grids, the local Z-axis of the anchor location establishes the Z-axis of the grid. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 10 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 SPATIAL PEAK SAR EVALUATION The procedure for spatial peak SAR evaluation has been implemented according to the IEEE1529 standard. It can be conducted for 1 g and 10 g. The DASY4 system allows evaluations that combine measured data and robot positions, such as: • maximum search • extrapolation • boundary correction • peak search for averaged SAR During a maximum search, global and local maximum searches are automatically performed in 2-D after each Area Scan measurement with at least 6 measurement points. It is based on the evaluation of the local SAR gradient calculated by the Quadratic Shepard’s method. The algorithm will find the global maximum and all local maxima within -2 dB of the global maxima for all SAR distributions. Extrapolation Extrapolation routines are used to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The extrapolation distance is determined by the surface detection distance and the probe sensor offset. Several measurements at different distances are necessary for the extrapolation. Extrapolation routines require at least 10 measurement points in 3-D space. They are used in the Cube Scan to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The routine uses the modified Quadratic Shepard’s method for extrapolation. For a grid using 5x5x7 measurement points with 5mm resolution amounting to 343 measurement points, the uncertainty of the extrapolation routines is less than 1% for 1 g and 10 g cubes. Boundary effect For measurements in the immediate vicinity of a phantom surface, the field coupling effects between the probe and the boundary influence the probe characteristics. Boundary effect errors of different dosimetric probe types have been analyzed by measurements and using a numerical probe model. As expected, both methods showed an enhanced sensitivity in the immediate vicinity of the boundary. The effect strongly depends on the probe dimensions and disappears with increasing distance from the boundary. The sensitivity can be approximately given as: Since the decay of the boundary effect dominates for small probes (a<<λ), the cos-term can be omitted. Factors Sb (parameter Alpha in the DASY4 software) and a (parameter Delta in the DASY4 software) are assessed during probe calibration and used for numerical compensation of the boundary effect. Several simulations and measurements have confirmed that the compensation is valid for different field and boundary configurations. This simple compensation procedure can largely reduce the probe uncertainty near boundaries. It works well as long as: • the boundary curvature is small • the probe axis is angled less than 30_ to the boundary normal • the distance between probe and boundary is larger than 25% of the probe diameter • the probe is symmetric (all sensors have the same offset from the probe tip) Since all of these requirements are fulfilled in a DASY4 system, the correction of the probe boundary effect in the vicinity of the phantom surface is performed in a fully automated manner via the measurement data extraction during postprocessing. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 11 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 5. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY UNCERTAINTY BUDGE ACCORDING TO IEEE P1528 Uncertainty Prob. (ci) (ci) Std. Std. (vi) Error Description Div. Value [%] Dist. 1g 10g Unc.(1g) Unc. (10g) veff Measurement System Probe Calibration ±4.8 N 1 1 1 ±4.8% ±4.8% ∞ Axial Isotropy ±4.7 R 3 0.7 0.7 ±1.9% ±1.9% ∞ Hemispherical Isotropy ±9.6 R 3 0.7 0.7 ±3.9% ±3.9% ∞ Boundary Effects ±1.0 R 3 1 1 ±0.6% ±0.6% ∞ Linearity ±4.7 R 3 1 1 ±2.7% ±2.7% ∞ System Detection Limits ±1.0 R 3 1 1 ±0.6% ±0.6% ∞ Readout Electronics ±1.0 N 3 1 1 ±1.0% ±1.0% ∞ Response Time ±0.8 R 3 1 1 ±0.5% ±0.5% ∞ Integration Time ±2.6 R 3 1 1 ±1.5% ±1.5% ∞ RF Ambient Condition ±1.59 R 3 1 1 ±0.9% ±0.9% ∞ Probe Positioner ±1.6 R 3 1 1 ±0.2% ±0.2% ∞ Probe Positioning ±2.9 R 3 1 1 ±1.7% ±1.7% ∞ Max. SAR Eval. ±1.0 R 3 1 1 ±0.6% ±0.6% ∞ Test sample Related Device Positioning ±1.1 N 1 1 1 ±1.1% ±1.1% 145 Device Holder ±3.6 N 1 1 1 ±3.6% ±3.6% 5 Power Drift ±5.0 R 3 1 1 ±2.9% ±2.9% ∞ Phantom and Setup Phantom Uncertainty ±4.0 R 3 1 1 ±2.3% ±2.3% ∞ Liquid Conductivity (target) ±5.0 R 3 0.64 0.43 ±1.8% ±1.2% ∞ Liquid Conductivity (meas.) ±2.5 N 1 0.64 0.43 ±1.6% ±1.1% ∞ Liquid Peermittivity (target) ±5.0 R 3 0.6 0.49 ±1.7% ±1.4% ∞ Liquid Permittivity (meas.) ±2.5 N 1 0.6 0.49 ±1.5% ±1.2% ∞ Combined Std. Uncertainty ±9.8% ±9.6% 330 Expanded STD Uncertainty ±19.6% ±19.2% Table: Worst-case uncertainty for DASY4 assessed according to IEEE P1528. The budge is valid for the frequency range 300MHz – 3GHz and represents a worst-case analysis. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 12 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 6. EXPOSURE LIMIT (A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (W/kg) Whole-Body Partial-Body Hands, Wrists, Feet and Ankles 0.4 8.0 20.0 (B) Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (W/kg) Whole-Body Partial-Body Hands, Wrists, Feet and Ankles 0.08 1.6 4.0 NOTE 1: See Section 1 for discussion of exposure categories. NOTE 2: Whole-Body SAR is averaged over the entire body, partial-body SAR is averaged over any 1 gram of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube. SAR for hands, wrists, feet and ankles is averaged over any 10 grams of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube. NOTE 3: At frequencies above 6.0 GHz, SAR limits are not applicable and MPE limits for power density should be applied at 5 cm or more from the transmitting device. NOTE 4: The time averaging criteria for field strength and power density do not apply to general population SAR limit of 47 CFR §2.1093 NOTE GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE PARTIAL BODY LIMIT 1.6 mW/g COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 13 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 7. MEASUREMENT RESULTS 7.1. SIMULATING LIQUIDS PARAMETER CHECK The simulating liquids should be checked at the beginning of a series of SAR measurements to determine of the dielectric parameters are within the tolerances of the specified target values. The relative permittivity and conductivity of the tissue material should be within ± 5% of the values given in the table below. 5% may not be easily achieved at certain frequencies. Under such circumstances, 10% tolerance may be used until more precise tissue recipes are available. TISSUE DIELECTRIC PARAMETERS FOR HEAD AND BODY PHANTOMS The head tissue dielectric parameters recommended by the IEEE SCC-34/SC-2 in P1528 have been incorporated in the following table. These head parameters are derived from planar layer models simulating the highest expected SAR for the dielectric properties and tissue thickness variations in a human head. Other head and body tissue parameters that have not been specified in P1528 are derived from the tissue dielectric parameters computed from the 4-Cole-Cole equations and extrapolated according to the head parameters specified in P1528. Head Body Target Frequency (MHz) εr σ (S/m) εr σ (S/m) 150 52.3 0.76 61.9 0.80 300 45.3 0.87 58.2 0.92 450 43.5 0.87 56.7 0.94 835 41.5 0.90 55.2 0.97 900 41.5 0.97 55.0 1.05 915 41.5 0.98 55.0 1.06 1450 40.5 1.20 54.0 1.30 1610 40.3 1.29 53.8 1.40 1800 – 2000 40.0 1.40 53.3 1.52 2450 39.2 1.80 52.7 1.95 3000 38.5 2.40 52.0 2.73 5800 35.3 5.27 48.2 6.00 (εr = relative permittivity, σ = conductivity and ρ = 1000 kg/m3) TYPICAL COMPOSITION OF INGREDIENTS FOR LIQUID TISSUE PHANTOMS The following tissue formulations are provided for reference only as some of the parameters have not been thoroughly verified. The composition of ingredients may be modified accordingly to achieve the desired target tissue parameters required for routine SAR evaluation. Ingredients Frequency (MHz) (% by weight) 450 835 915 1900 2450 Tissue Type Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Water 38.56 51.16 41.45 52.4 41.05 56.0 54.9 40.4 62.7 73.2 Salt (NaCl) 3.95 1.49 1.45 1.4 1.35 0.76 0.18 0.5 0.5 0.04 Sugar 56.32 46.78 56.0 45.0 56.5 41.76 0.0 58.0 0.0 0.0 HEC 0.98 0.52 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.21 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Bactericide 0.19 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.27 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Triton X-100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 DGBE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.92 0.0 0.0 26.7 Dielectric Constant 43.42 58.0 42.54 56.1 42.0 56.8 39.9 54.0 39.8 52.5 Conductivity (S/m) 0.85 0.83 0.91 0.95 1.0 1.07 1.42 1.45 1.88 1.78 + + Salt: 99 % Pure Sodium Chloride Sugar: 98 % Pure Sucrose + Water: De-ionized, 16 MΩ resistivity HEC: Hydroxyethyl Cellulose + DGBE: 99 % Di(ethylene glycol) butyl ether, [2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol] Triton X-100 (ultra pure): Polyethylene glycol mono [4-(1,1, 3, 3-tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]ether COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 14 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 SIMULATING LIQUIDS PARAMETER CHECK RESULTS Date: May 25, 2004 Ambient condition: Ambient Temperature = 24°C; Relative humidity = 37% Simulating Liquid Parameters Target Measured Deviation (%) Limit (%) Medium f (MHz) Temp. (°C) Depth (cm) є" Relative Permittivity (єr): 40.0 39.9907 -0.02 ±5 Head 1900 23 15 13.2617 Conductivity (σ): 1.40 1.402 0.13 ±5 Note: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. The conductivity (σ) can be given as: σ = T ,0 ,″ = 2 B f ,0 ,″ where f = target f * 106 ,0 = 8.854 * 10-12 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 15 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 SIMULATING LIQUIDS PARAMETER CHECK RESULTS (CONTINUED) Date: May 25, 2004 Ambient condition: Ambient Temperature = 24°C; Relative humidity = 37% Simulating Liquid Parameters Target Measured Deviation (%) Limit (%) Medium f (MHz) Temp. (°C) Depth (cm) є" Relative Permittivity (єr): 53.3 53.6339 0.63 ±5 Muscle 1900 23 15 14.3651 Conductivity (σ): 1.52 1.5184 -0.11 ±5 Note: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. The conductivity (σ) can be given as: σ = T ,0 ,″ = 2 B f ,0 ,″ where f = target f * 106 ,0 = 8.854 * 10-12 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 16 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 SIMULATING LIQUIDS PARAMETER CHECK RESULTS (CONTINUED) Date: May 26, 2004 Ambient condition: Ambient Temperature = 24°C; Relative humidity = 38% Simulating Liquid Parameters Target Measured Deviation (%) Limit (%) Medium f (MHz) Temp. (°C) Depth (cm) є" Relative Permittivity (єr): 41.5 42.0407 1.30 ±5 Head 835 23 15 19.7866 Conductivity (σ): 0.90 0.9191 2.13 ±5 Note: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. The conductivity (σ) can be given as: σ = T ,0 ,″ = 2 B f ,0 ,″ where f = target f * 106 ,0 = 8.854 * 10-12 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 17 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 SIMULATING LIQUIDS PARAMETER CHECK RESULTS (CONTINUED) Date: May 26, 2004 Ambient condition: Ambient Temperature = 24°C; Relative humidity = 38% Simulating Liquid Parameters Target Measured Deviation (%) Limit (%) Medium f (MHz) Temp. (°C) Depth (cm) є" Relative Permittivity (єr): 55.2 56.4476 2.26 ±5 Muscle 835 23 15 20.8501 Conductivity (σ): 0.97 0.9685 -0.15 ±5 Note: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. The conductivity (σ) can be given as: σ = T ,0 ,″ = 2 B f ,0 ,″ where f = target f * 106 ,0 = 8.854 * 10-12 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 18 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 7.2. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK The system performance check is performed prior to any usage of the system in order to guarantee reproducible results. The system performance check verifies that the system operates within its specifications. The system performance check results are tabulated below. And also the corresponding SAR plot is attached as well in the SAR plots files. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK MEASUREMENT CONDITIONS • The measurements were performed in the flat section of the SAM twin phantom filled with Head simulating liquid of the following parameters. • The DASY4 system with an E-fileld probe ET3DV6 SN: 1577 was used for the measurements. • The dipole was mounted on the small tripod so that the dipole feed point was positioned below the center marking of the flat phantom section and the dipole was oriented parallel to the body axis (the long side of the phantom). The standard measuring distance was 10 mm (above 1 GHz) and 15 mm (below 1 GHz) from dipole center to the simulating liquid surface. • The coarse grid with a grid spacing of 15 mm was aligned with the dipole. • Special 5 x 5 x 7 fine cube was chosen for cube integration(dx=dy=7.5mm; dz=5mm). • Distance between probe sensors and phantom surface was set to 4 mm. • The dipole input power (forward power) was 250 mW±3%. • The results are normalized to 1 W input power. REFERENCE SAR VALUES The system performance check is performed prior to any usage of the system in order to guarantee reproducible results. The system performance check verifies that the system operates within its specifications of ±10%. The system performance check results are tabulated below. And also the corresponding SAR plot is attached as well in the SAR plots files. IEEE P1528 Recommended Reference Value Frequency Local SAR at surface Local SAR at surface 1 g SAR 10 g SAR (MHz) (Above feed point) (y=2cm offset from feed point) 300 3.0 2.0 4.4 2.1 450 4.9 3.3 7.2 3.2 835 9.5 6.2 14.1 4.9 900 10.8 6.9 16.4 5.4 1450 29.0 16.0 50.2 6.5 1800 38.1 19.8 69.5 6.8 1900 39.7 20.5 72.1 6.6 2450 52.4 24.0 104.2 7.7 3000 63.8 25.7 140.2 9.5 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 19 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK RESULTS @ SYSTEM VALIDATION DIPOLE: D2450V2 SN: 706 Ambient condition: Temperature = 24°C; Relative humidity = 37% Date: May 25, 2004 H e a d S im u la tin g L iq u id P a ra m e te rs T a rg e t M e a s u re d D e via tio n [% ] L im ite d [% ] f (M H z) T e m p . [°C ] D e p th [c m ] 1 9 0 0 .0 0 2 3 .0 0 1 5 .0 0 1g SAR: 3 9 .7 3 8 .4 0 -3 .2 7 ± 10 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK RESULTS @ SYSTEM VALIDATION DIPOLE: D835V2 SN: 4d002 Ambient condition: Temperature = 24°C Relative humidity = 38% Date: May 26, 2004 H e a d S im u la tin g L iq u id P a ra m e te rs T a rg e t M e a s u re d D e via tio n [% ] L im ite d [% ] f (M H z) T e m p . [°C ] D e p th [c m ] 835 23 15 1g SAR: 9 .5 9 .5 6 0 .6 3 ± 10 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 20 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 7.3. SAR MEASUREMENTS RESULTS 1. CDMA PCS Band - Right Tilt Position CDMA PCS Band - Duty cycle: 100%; Crest factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15 cm *Power Reference [V/m] SAR_1g [mW/g] EUT Position Antenna Ch. # f [MHz] Before After Measured Limited Right Tilted 805-606-204 25 1851.25 15.90 1.94 0.673 1.6 Right Tilted 805-606-204 25 1851.25 16.00 15.90 0.638** 1.6 Right Tilted 805-606-102 1175 1908.75 11.00 10.95 0.377 1.6 Right Tilted 805-606-102 1175 1908.75 10.80 10.87 0.375** 1.6 1. Notes: 2. *: Power reference measured from DASY System measurement job “Power reference measurement”. 3. **: Co-located SAR measurement result with the WLAN and Bluetooth radio card. (Transmitting simultaneously) 4. Antennas - P/N: 805-606-204 (Single band PCS); P/N: 805-606-102 (Dual band). 5. Please see attachment for the detailed measurement data and plots showing the maximum SAR location of the EUT. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 21 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 2. CDMA PCS Band - Body Position CDMA PCS band - Duty cycle: 100%; Crest factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15 cm *Power Reference [V/m] SAR_1g [mW/g] EUT Position Antenna Ch. # f [MHz] Before After Measured Limited Right side 805-606-204 25 1851.25 20.10 20.13 0.983 1.6 Right side 805-606-204 25 1851.25 20.00 19.95 0.972** 1.6 Notes: 1. *: Power reference measured from DASY System measurement job “Power reference measurement”. 2. **: Co-located SAR measurement result with the WLAN and Bluetooth radio card. (Transmitting simultaneously) 3. Antenna - P/N: 805-606-204 (Single band PCS). 4. Please see attachment for the detailed measurement data and plots showing the maximum SAR location of the EUT. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 22 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 3. CDMA Cellular Band - Right Touch Position CDMA PCS band - Duty cycle: 100%; Crest factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15 cm *Power Reference [V/m] SAR_1g [mW/g] EUT Position Antenna Ch. # f [MHz] Before After Measured Limited Right Touched 805-606-102 363 835.89 10.09 10.07 0.193 1.6 Right Touched 805-606-102 363 835.89 10.40 10.38 0.183** 1.6 Notes: 1. *: Power reference measured from DASY System measurement job “Power reference measurement”. 2. **: Co-located SAR measurement result with the WLAN and Bluetooth radio card. (Transmitting simultaneously) 3. Antenna - P/N: 805-606-102 (Dual band). 4. Please see attachment for the detailed measurement data and plots showing the maximum SAR location of the EUT. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 23 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 4. CDMA Cellular band - Body Position CDMA PCS band - Duty cycle: 100%; Crest factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15 cm *Power Reference [V/m] SAR_1g [mW/g] EUT Position Antenna Ch. # f [MHz] Before After Measured Limited Back side 805-606-102 363 835.89 8.33 8.37 0.283 1.6 Back side 805-606-102 363 835.89 8.47 8.50 0.289** 1.6 Notes: 1. *: Power reference measured from DASY System measurement job “Power reference measurement”. 2. **: Co-located SAR measurement result with the WLAN and Bluetooth radio card. (Transmitting simultaneously) 3. Antennas - P/N: 805-606-102 (Dual band). 4. Please see attachment for the detailed measurement data and plots showing the maximum SAR location of the EUT. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 24 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 8. EUT PHOTOS EUT PHOTOS (1/3) P/N: 805-606-204 (Single band PCS) COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 25 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 EUT PHOTOS (2/3) P/N: 805-606-102 (Dual band). COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 26 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 EUT PHOTOS (3/3) Speaker COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 27 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 9. EQUIPMENT LIST & CALIBRATION STATUS Name of Equipment Manufacturer Type/Model Serial Number Cal. Due date S-Parameter Network Analyzer Agilent 8753ES-6 US39173569 8/8/04 Electronic Probe kit Hewlett Packard 85070C N/A N/A Power Meter Hewlett Packard 436A 2709A29209 7/15/04 Power Sensor Hewlett Packard 8482A 2349A08568 7/15/04 Amplifier Mini-Circuits ZVE-8G 0360 N/A Amplifier Mini-Circuits ZHL-42W D072701-5 N/A Radio Communication Tester Rohde & Schwarz CMU 200 838114/032 12/1/04 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) SPEAG DAE3 V1 500 12/23/04 Dosimetric E-Field Probe SPEAG ES3DV2 3021 7/29/04 System Validation Dipole SPEAG D835V2 4d002 1/12/06 System Validation Dipole SPEAG D1900V2 5d043 1/17/2006 Probe Alignment Unit SPEAG LB (V2) 261 N/A Robot Staubli RX90B L F00/5H31A1/A/01 N/A SAM Twin Phantom SPEAG TP-1785 QD 000 P40 CA N/A SAM Twin Phantom SPEAG TP-1015 N/A N/A Simulating Liquids CCS H1900 N/A Within 24 hrs of first test Simulating Liquids CCS M1900 N/A Within 24 hrs of first test Simulating Liquids CCS H835 N/A Within 24 hrs of first test Simulating Liquids CCS M835 N/A Within 24 hrs of first test COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 28 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 10. REFERENCES [1] Federal Communications Commission, \Report and order: Guidelines for evaluating the environ- mental effects of radiofrequency radiation", Tech. Rep. FCC 96-326, FCC, Washington, D.C. 20554, 1996. [2] David L. Means Kwok Chan, Robert F. Cleveland, \Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields", Tech. Rep., Federal Communication Commision, O_ce of Engineering & Technology, Washington, DC, 1997. [3] Thomas Schmid, Oliver Egger, and Niels Kuster, \Automated E-_eld scanning system for dosimetric assessments", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, pp. 105{113, Jan. 1996. [4] Niels Kuster, Ralph K.astle, and Thomas Schmid, \Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications equipment with known precision", IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, pp. 645{652, May 1997. [5] CENELEC, \Considerations for evaluating of human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from mobile telecommunication equipment (MTE) in the frequency range 30MHz - 6GHz", Tech. Rep., CENELEC, European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization, Brussels, 1997. [6] ANSI, ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992: IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, NY 10017, 1992. [7] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \Robust setup for precise calibration of E-_eld probes in tissue simulating liquids at mobile communications frequencies", in ICECOM _ 97, Dubrovnik, October 15{17, 1997, pp. 120{124. [8] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \E-_eld probe with improved isotropy in brain simulating liquids", in Proceedings of the ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, 23{25 June, 1996, pp. 172{175. [9] Volker Hombach, Klaus Meier, Michael Burkhardt, Eberhard K. uhn, and Niels Kuster, \The dependence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 900 MHz", IEEE Transactions onMicrowave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1865{1873, Oct. 1996. [10] Klaus Meier, Ralf Kastle, Volker Hombach, Roger Tay, and Niels Kuster, \The dependence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 1800 MHz", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Oct. 1997, in press. [11] W. Gander, Computermathematik, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992. [12] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky,W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recepies in C, The Art of Scientific Computing, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992..Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 9 [13] NIS81 NAMAS, \The treatment of uncertainity in EMC measurement", Tech. Rep., NAMAS Executive, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, England, 1994. [14] Barry N. Taylor and Christ E. Kuyatt, \Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results", Tech. Rep., National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1994. Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 10 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 29 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04U2716-1B DATE: May 26, 2004 FCC ID: HN2SB555-2 11. ATTACHMENTS No. Contents No. of page (s) 1 System Performance Check Plots 4 2-1 SAR Test Plots – CDMA PCS Band 9 2-2 SAR Test Plots – CDMA Cellular Band 6 3 Probe_ES3DV2-SN: 3021 13 4 System Performance Check Dipole - 835MHz 6 5 System Performance Check Dipole - 1900MHz 6 End of Report COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 30 of 30 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.


Document Created: 2004-06-22 09:52:31
Document Modified: 2004-06-22 09:52:31
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC