DFS Test Report

FCC ID: EHA-RC12

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_1403923

Intermec Technologies Corporation Model: RC12 in 1000CP01 Tested to the following DFS Specifications: FCC 15.407: 2010 RSS-210 Issue 7: 2007 EN 301 893 V1.5.1:2008 Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 Report Prepared By www.nwemc.com 1-888-EMI-CERT © 2010 Northwest EMC, Inc

22975 NW Evergreen Parkway Suite 400 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Certificate of Test Last Date of Test: December 1, 2010 Intermec Technologies Corporation Model: RC12 in 1000CP01 Emissions Test Description Specification Test Method Pass/Fail FCC 15.407:2010 FCC 06-96:2006 Pass Client Device DFS Conformance Test RSS-210 Issue 7:2007 RSS-210 Issue 7:2007 Pass EN 301 893 V1.5.1:2008 EN 301 893 V1.5.1:2008 Pass Modifications made to the product See the Modifications section of this report Test Facility The measurement facility used to collect the data is located at: Northwest EMC, Inc. 22975 NW Evergreen Parkway, Suite 400 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Phone: (503) 844-4066 Fax: 844-3826 This site has been fully described in a report filed with and accepted by the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) and Industry Canada (Site filing #2834D-2). Approved By: Greg Kiemel, Director of Engineering This report must not be used to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government of the United States of America. Product compliance is the responsibility of the client, therefore the tests and equipment modes of operation represented in this report were agreed upon by the client, prior to testing. This Report may only be duplicated in its entirety. The results of this test pertain only to the sample(s) tested. The specific description is noted in each of the individual sections of the test report supporting this certificate of test. Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 2/21

Northwest Revision History EMC Revision 06/29/09 Revision Description Date Page Number Number 01 Updated with client attestation 1-11-11 8,9 Barometric Pressure The recorded barometric pressure has been normalized to sea level. Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 3/21

Accreditations and Authorizations FCC Accredited by NVLAP for performance of FCC radio, digital, and ISM device testing. Our Open Area Test Sites, certification chambers, and conducted measurement facilities have been fully described in reports filed with the FCC and accepted by the FCC in letters maintained in our files. Northwest EMC has been accredited by ANSI to ISO / IEC Guide 65 as a product certifier. We have been designated by the FCC as a Telecommunications Certification Body (TCB). This allows Northwest EMC to certify transmitters to FCC specifications in accordance with 47 CFR 2.960 and 2.962. NVLAP Northwest EMC, Inc. is accredited under the United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, and National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for satisfactory compliance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 for Testing Laboratories. The NVLAP accreditation encompasses NVLAP LAB CODE 200629-0 Electromagnetic Compatibility Testing in accordance with the European Union EMC Directive 2004/108/EC, and NVLAP LAB CODE 200630-0 ANSI C63.4. Additionally, Northwest EMC is accredited by NVLAP to perform radio testing in accordance with the NVLAP LAB CODE 200676-0 NVLAP LAB CODE 200761-0 European Union R&TTE Directive 1999/5/EEC, the requirements of FCC, and the RSS radio standards for NVLAP LAB CODE 200881-0 Industry Canada. Industry Canada Accredited by NVLAP for performance of Industry Canada RSS and ICES testing. Our Open Area Test Sites and certification chambers comply with RSS-Gen, Issue 2 and have been filed with Industry Canada and accepted. Northwest EMC has been accredited by ANSI to ISO / IEC Guide 65 as a product certifier. We have been designated by NIST and recognized by Industry Canada as a Certification Body (CB) per the APEC Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA). This allows Northwest EMC to certify transmitters to Industry Canada technical requirements. (Site Filing Numbers - Hillsboro: 2834D-1, 2834D-2, Sultan: 2834C-1, Irvine: 2834B-1, 2834B-2, Brooklyn Park: 2834E-1) CAB Designated by NIST and validated by the European Commission as a Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) to conduct tests and approve products to the EMC directive and transmitters to the R&TTE directive, as described in the U.S. - EU Mutual Recognition Agreement. NEMKO Assessed and accredited by NEMKO (Norwegian testing and certification body) for European emissions and immunity testing. As a result of NEMKO's laboratory assessment, they will accept test results from Northwest EMC, Inc. for product certification (Authorization No. ELA 119). Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 4/21

Accreditations and Authorizations Australia/New Zealand The National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA), Australia has been appointed by the ACA as an accreditation body to accredit test laboratories and competent bodies for EMC standards. Accredited test reports or assessments by competent bodies must carry the NATA logo. Test reports made by an overseas laboratory that has been accredited for the relevant standards by an overseas accreditation body that has a Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) with NATA are also accepted as technical grounds for product conformity. The report should be endorsed with the respective logo of the accreditation body (NVLAP). VCCI Accepted as an Associate Member to the VCCI, Acceptance No. 564. Conducted and radiated measurement facilities have been registered in accordance with Regulations for Voluntary Control Measures, Article 8. (Registration Numbers. - Hillsboro: C-1071, R-1025, G-84, C-2687, T-1658, and R-2318, Irvine: R-1943, G-85, C- 2766, and T-1659, Sultan: R-871, G-83, C-1784, and T-1511, Brooklyn Park: R-3125, G-86, G-141, C-3464, and T-1634). BSMI Northwest EMC has been designated by NIST and validated by C-Taipei (BSMI) as a CAB to conduct tests as described in the APEC Mutual Recognition Agreement (US0017). License No.SL2-IN-E-1017. GOST Northwest EMC, Inc. has been assessed and accredited by the Russian Certification bodies Certinform VNIINMASH, CERTINFO, SAMTES, and Federal CHEC, to perform EMC and Hygienic testing for Information Technology Products. As a result of their laboratory assessment, they will accept test results from Northwest EMC, Inc. for product certification KCC Northwest EMC, Inc is a CAB designated by MRA partners and recognized by Korea. (Assigned Lab Numbers: Hillsboro: US0017, Irvine: US0158, Sultan: US0157) VIETNAM Vietnam MIC has approved Northwest EMC as an accredited test lab. Per Decision No. 194/QD-QLCL (dated December 15, 2009), Northwest EMC test reports can be used for Vietnam approval submissions. SCOPE For details on the Scopes of our Accreditations, please visit: http://www.nwemc.com/accreditations/ Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 5/21

Northwest EMC Locations Oregon California Minnesota Washington New York Labs EV01-EV12 Labs OC01-OC13 Labs MN01-MN08 Labs SU01-SU07 Labs WA01-WA04 th 22975 NW Evergreen Pkwy 41 Tesla 9349 W Broadway Ave. 14128 339 Ave. SE 4939 Jordan Rd. Suite 400 Irvine, CA 92618 Brooklyn Park, Sultan, WA 98294 Elbridge, NY 13060 Hillsboro, OR 97124 (949) 861-8918 MN 55445 (360) 793-8675 (315) 685-0796 (503) 844-4066 (763) 425-2281 Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 6/21

Northwest EMC Product Description Rev 11/17/06 Party Requesting the Test Company Name: Intermec Technologies Corporation Address: 6001 36th Avenue West City, State, Zip: Everett, WA 98203-1264 Test Requested By: Wayne Rieger Model: RC12 in 1000CP01 First Date of Test: December 1, 2010 Last Date of Test: December 1, 2010 Receipt Date of Samples: November 30, 2010 Equipment Design Stage: Production Equipment Condition: No Damage U-NII Device Description Functional Description The Model RC12 is an 802.11a/b/g/n - Bluetooth radio module. It is a client device and has no radar detection and no ad-hoc capability. For this DFS test, it was installed in Intermec’s handheld computer, Model 1000CP01. Hardware, Firmware, and OS Versions: Hardware version: P4 Firmware version: 6.1.0.0.337 OS versions: 1.20.0.0512 The operating frequency range(s) of the equipment. 2412 – 2462 MHz 5180 – 5240 MHz 5260 - 5320 MHz (DFS Band) 5500 – 5700 MHz (DFS Band) 5745 – 5825 MHz The operating modes (Master and/or Client) of the U-NII device. Client device with no radar detection and no ad-hoc capability For Client devices, indicate whether or not it has DFS capabilities and indicate the FCC (and IC) identifier for the Master U-NII Device that is used with it for DFS testing. The client device has no radar detection and no ad-hoc capability. A DFS-compliant Master device was used for testing. It’s the CISCO Model AIR-AP1252AG-A-K9, FCC ID:LDK102061, IC: 2461B-102061 List the highest and the lowest possible power level (equivalent isotropic radiated power (EIRP) of the equipment. The maximum EIRP of the 5 GHz equipment is 17.8 dBm, and the minimum possible EIRP is 12.1 dBm. Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 7/21

Northwest EMC Product Description Rev 11/17/06 Test sequences or messages that should be used for communication between Master and Client Devices, which are used for loading the Channel. 1. Stream the test file from the Master Device to the Client Device for IP based systems or frame based systems which dynamically allocate the talk/listen ratio. 2. For frame based systems with fixed talk/listen ratio, set the ratio to 45%/55% and stream the test file from the Master to the Client. 3. For other system architectures, supply appropriate Channel loading methodology. System testing was performed with the MPEG test file that streams full motion video at 30 frames per second from the Master to the Client IP based system. Intermec provided the following attestation of how the channel loading requirements were met: “Per Section 7.7 of the FCC Procedure, the Intermec DFS test system uses the test file designated by the NTIA. The video format and codec are equivalent to those specified by the NTIA.” Transmit Power Control description. This device does not exceed 27dBm EIRP, so no transmit power control is implemented. System architectures, data rates, U-NII Channel bandwidths. 1. Indicate the type(s) of system architecture (e.g. IP based or Frame based) that the U-NII device employs. Each type of unique architecture must be tested. The client device (EUT) employs IP based system architecture. The time required for the Master Device and/or Client Device to complete its power-on cycle. The Master device used in the test system requires 1.44 minutes to complete its power-on cycle. The client device (EUT) does not have radar detection, so its power-on time is not applicable, but was measured to be 1.8 minutes. Manufacturer statement confirming that information regarding the parameters of the detected Radar Waveforms is not available to the end user. The client device (EUT) does not have radar detection, so the parameters of the Radar Waveforms are not available to the end user. Uniform Channel Spreading requirement for Master Devices. For Master Devices, indicate how the master provides, on aggregate, uniform Channel loading of the spectrum across all Channels. The client device (EUT) does not have radar detection, so this requirement is not applicable. Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 8/21

Northwest EMC Product Description Rev 11/17/06 List all antenna assemblies and their corresponding gains. 1. If radiated tests are to be performed, the U-NII Device should be tested with the lowest gain antenna assembly (regardless of antenna type). The report should indicate which antenna assembly was used for the tests. For devices with adjustable output power, list the output power range and the maximum EIRP for each antenna assembly. 2. If conducted tests are to be performed, indicate which antenna port/connection was used for the tests and the antenna assembly gain that was used to set the DFS Detection Threshold level during calibration of the test setup. a. Indicate the calibrated conducted DFS Detection Threshold level. b. For devices with adjustable output power, list the output power range and the maximum EIRP for each antenna assembly. c. Indicate the antenna connector impedance. Ensure that the measurement instruments match (usually 50 Ohms) or use a minimum loss pad and take into account the conversion loss. 3. Antenna gain measurement verification for tested antenna. a. Describe procedure b. Describe the antenna configuration and how it is mounted c. If an antenna cable is supplied with the device, cable loss needs to be taken into account. Indicate the maximum cable length and either measure the gain with this cable or adjust the measured gain accordingly. State the cable loss. The client device (EUT) has only one antenna port. A conducted DFS test was performed using the client device’s only antenna port. It has 50 ohm impedance. The antenna gain of the client device was measured by Intermec in their ETS Lindgren antenna chamber. It was a free space measurement of the antenna gain while installed in its final configuration in the Model 1000CP01 handheld computer. The measured gain included cable loss from the antenna cable connecting the antenna to the radio module’s RF output. The maximum gain in the 5 GHz bands is 4.0 dBi. The minimum gain is 1.4 dBi. The calibrated conducted DFS detection threshold was set to -63 dBm at the antenna port of the Master. This is equal to the DFS Detection Threshold of the Master + 1 dB. Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 9/21

Northwest EMC Introduction Rev 11/17/06 Applicability of DFS Requirements Prior to Use of a Channel Requirement Operational Mode Master Client (without DFS) Client (with DFS) Non-Occupancy Period Yes Not required Yes DFS Detection Threshold Yes Not required Yes Channel Availability Check Time Yes Not required Not required Uniform Spreading Yes Not required Not required U-NII Detection Bandwidth Yes Not required Yes Applicability of DFS requirements during normal operation Requirement Operational Mode Master Client (without DFS) Client (with DFS) DFS Detection Threshold Yes Not required Yes Channel Closing Transmission Time Yes Yes Yes Channel Move Time Yes Yes Yes U-NII Detection Bandwidth Yes Not required Yes DFS Response Requirement Values Parameter Value Non-occupancy Minimum 30 minutes Channel Availability Check Time 60 seconds Channel Move Time 10 seconds (See Note 1) Channel Closing Transmission Time 200 milliseconds + an aggregate of 60 milliseconds over remaining 10 second period. (See Notes 1 and 2). Minimum 80% of the UNII 99% transmission power U-NII Detection Bandwidth bandwidth. (See Note 3). Note 1: The instant that the Channel Move Time and the Channel Closing Transmission Time begins is as follows: • For the Short Pulse Radar Test Signals this instant is the end of the Burst. • For the Frequency Hopping radar Test Signal, this instant is the end of the last radar Burst generated. • For the Long Pulse Radar Test Signal this instant is the end of the 12 second period defining the Radar Waveform. Note 2: The Channel Closing Transmission Time is comprised of 200 milliseconds starting at the beginning of the Channel Move Time plus any additional intermittent control signals required to facilitate a Channel move (an aggregate of 60 milliseconds) during the remainder of the 10 second period. The aggregate duration of control signals will not count quiet periods in between transmissions. Note 3: During the U-NII Detection Bandwidth detection test, radar type 1 is used and for each frequency step the minimum percentage of detection is 90 percent. Measurements are performed with no data traffic. Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 10/21

Northwest EMC Introduction Rev 11/17/06 DFS Detection Thresholds for Master or Client Devices Incorporating DFS Maximum Transmit Power Value (See Notes 1 and 2) ≥ 200 milliwatt -64 dBm < 200 milliwatt -62 dBm Note 1: This is the level at the input of the receiver assuming a 0 dBi receive antenna. Note 2: Throughout these test procedures an additional 1 dB has been added to the amplitude of the test transmission waveforms to account for variations in measurement equipment. This will ensure that the test signal is at or above the detection threshold level to trigger a DFS response. Short Pulse Radar Test Waveforms Minimum Number Minimum Pulse Width PRI Percentage of Radar Type of Number of (µsec) (µsec) Successful Pulses Trials Detection 1 1 1428 18 60% 30 2 1-5 150 - 230 23 - 29 60% 30 3 6 -10 200 - 500 16 – 18 60% 30 4 11 - 20 200 - 500 12 -16 60% 30 Aggregate (Radar Types 1-4) 80% 120 Long Pulse Radar Test Waveforms Minimum Number Pulse Chirp Number Percentage Minimum Radar PRI of Width Width of of Number of Type (µsec) Pulses per (µsec) (MHz) Bursts Successful Trials Burst Detection 5 50 - 100 5 - 20 1000 - 2000 1-3 8 - 20 80% 30 Frequency Hopping Radar Test Waveform Minimum Hopping Pulse Hopping Percentage Minimum Radar PRI Pulses per Sequence Width Rate of Number of Type (µsec) Hop Length (µsec) (kHz) Successful Trials (msec) Detection 6 1 333 9 0.333 300 70% 30 Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 11/21

Northwest Configurations EMC Revision 9/21/05 CONFIGURATION 1 INMC0648 EUT Description Manufacturer Model/Part Number Serial Number EUT - WLAN Client Intermec CN70 24311047002 Peripherals in test setup boundary Description Manufacturer Model/Part Number Serial Number USB Snapon adapter Intermec 225-773-001 None AC Adapter Intermec AE39 02061000875 Remote Equipment Outside of Test Setup Boundary Description Manufacturer Model/Part Number Serial Number WLAN Master Access Point Cisco AIR-LAP1252G-A-K9 FTX123590JT Cables Cable Type Shield Length (m) Ferrite Connection 1 Connection 2 AC Mains No 1.8m No AC Adapter AC Mains DC Power PA 1.8m PA AC Adapter Snap-on adapter PA = Cable is permanently attached to the device. Shielding and/or presence of ferrite may be unknown. Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 12/21

Northwest Modifications EMC Revision 4/28/03 Equipment modifications Item Date Test Modification Note Disposition of EUT Client Device No EMI suppression Tested as DFS devices were added Scheduled testing 1 12/1/2010 delivered to Conformance or modified during this was completed. Test Station. Test test. Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 13/21

NORTHWEST Macro Version EMC Client Device DFS Conformance Test description For a Client Device without DFS, the Channel Move Time and Channel Closing Transmission Time requirements are verified with one Short Pulse Radar. For testing a Client Device with In-Service Monitoring, two configurations must be tested. The Client Device must demonstrate it can detect the Radar Waveform. The Channel Move Time and Channel Closing Transmission Time requirements specified will be verified utilizing Short Pulse Radar. Channel Closing Transmission Time: The total duration of transmissions, consisting of data signals and the aggregate of control signals, by a U- NII device during the Channel Move Time. Channel Move Time: The time to cease all transmissions on the current Channel upon detection of a Radar Waveform above the DFS Detection Threshold. A Client Device will not transmit before having received appropriate control signals from a Master Device. p y Time and Channel Closing Transmission Time requirements. The Client Device will not resume any transmissions until it has again received control signals from a Master Device. If a Client Device is performing In-Service Monitoring and detects a Radar Waveform above the DFS Detection Threshold, it will inform the Master Device. Irrespective of Client Device or Master Device detection, the Channel Move Time and Channel Closing Transmission Time requirements remain the same. DFS Detection Thresholds for Master or Client Devices Incorporating DFS DFS Response Requirement Values Setting the Test Signal Level The radar test signal level is set at the Master Device, or the Client Device with In-Service Monitoring, as appropriate for the particular test. This device is known as the Radar Detection Device (RDD). • When a Client Device without In-Service Monitoring is the UUT, the Master Device is the RDD. • When a Client Device with In-Service Monitoring is the UUT, and is tested for response to the Master Device detections, the Master Device is the RDD. • When a Client Device with In-Service Monitoring is the UUT, and is tested for independent response to detections by the Client Device, the Client Device is the RDD. A spectrum analyzer is used to establish the test signal level for each radar type. During this process, there are no transmissions by either the Master Device or Client Device. The spectrum analyzer is switched to the zero span (time domain) mode at the frequency of the Radar Waveform generator. The peak detector function of the spectrum analyzer is utilized. The spectrum analyzer resolution bandwidth (RBW) and video bandwidth (VBW) are set to at least 3 MHz. The signal generator amplitude and/or step attenuators are set so that the power level measured at the spectrum analyzer is equal to the DFS Detection Threshold that is required for the tests. The signal generator and attenuator settings are recorded for use during the test. Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 14/21

NORTHWEST Macro Version EMC Client Device DFS Conformance Test description DFS MONITORING System testing will be performed with the designated MPEG test file that streams full motion video at 30 frames per second for Channel loading. If the designated MPEG test file is not utilized then an equivalent test file will be used, subject to FCC approval. CHANNEL LOADING System testing will be performed with the designated MPEG test file that streams full motion video at 30 frames per second for Channel loading. If the designated MPEG test file is not utilized then an equivalent test file will be used, subject to FCC approval. TEST EQUIPMENT Description Manufacturer Model ID Last Cal. Interval Spectrum Analyzer Agilent E4440A AFD 6/1/2009 24 mo RF Vector Signal Generator Agilent V2920A TIC 10/27/2010 12 mo Oscilloscope Tektronix TDS 3052 TOF 12/10/2008 24 mo Signal Generator Agilent E8257D TGX 12/10/2008 25 mo Power Meter Gigatronics 8651A SPM 1/7/2010 13 mo TEST DESCRIPTION The tests in this section are run sequentially and the UUT must pass all tests successfully. If the UUT fails any one of the tests it will count as a failure of compliance. To show compliance, all tests must be performed with waveforms randomly generated as specified with test results meeting the required percentage of successful detection criteria. All test results must be reported to the FCC. One frequency will be chosen from the operating Channels of the UUT within the 5.25-5.35 GHz or 5.47-5.725 GHz bands. Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 15/21

NORTHWEST XMit 2010.11.03 EMC DFS CHANNEL SHUTDOWN, MOVE, NON-OCCUPANCY EUT: RC12 in 1000CP01 Work Order: INMC0648 Serial Number: 24311047002 Date: 12/01/10 Customer: Intermec Technologies Corporation Temperature: 22°C Attendees: None Humidity: 38% Project: None Barometric Pres.: 30.11 inches Tested by: Rod Peloquin & Don Facteau Power: 120VAC/60Hz Job Site: EV06 TEST SPECIFICATIONS Test Method FCC 15.407:2010 FCC 06-96:2006 COMMENTS The calibrated conducted DFS detection threshold was set to -63 dBm at the antenna port of the Master. This is equal to the DFS Detection Threshold of the Master + 1 dB DEVIATIONS FROM TEST STANDARD No Deviations Configuration # 1 Signature Value Limit Results Lower Sub-Band 5250 MHz - 5350 MHz 300 ms period 25.7 ms N/A N/A 1.2s period < 260 ms ≤ 260 ms aggregate Pass 12.5s period < 1 second ≤10 seconds Pass 30 minute period > 30 Minutes ≥ 30 Minutes Pass Upper Sub-Band 5470 MHz - 5725 MHz 300 ms period 25.7 ms N/A N/A 1.2s period < 260 ms ≤ 260 ms aggregate Pass 12.5s period < 1 second ≤ 10 seconds Pass 30 minute period > 30 Minutes ≥ 30 Minutes Pass Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 16/21

NORTHWEST XMit 2010.11.03 EMC DFS CHANNEL SHUTDOWN, MOVE, NON-OCCUPANCY Lower Sub-Band 5250 MHz - 5350 MHz, 300 ms period Result: N/A Value: 25.7 ms Limit: N/A T0 T1 Lower Sub-Band 5250 MHz - 5350 MHz, 1.2s period Result: Pass Value: < 260 ms Limit: ≤ 260 ms aggregate T1 T2 Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 17/21

NORTHWEST XMit 2010.11.03 EMC DFS CHANNEL SHUTDOWN, MOVE, NON-OCCUPANCY Lower Sub-Band 5250 MHz - 5350 MHz, 12.5s period Result: Pass Value: < 1 second Limit: ≤10 seconds T1 T2 Lower Sub-Band 5250 MHz - 5350 MHz, 30 minute period Result: Pass Value: > 30 Minutes Limit: ≥ 30 Minutes T2 T3 Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 18/21

NORTHWEST XMit 2010.11.03 EMC DFS CHANNEL SHUTDOWN, MOVE, NON-OCCUPANCY Upper Sub-Band 5470 MHz - 5725 MHz, 300 ms period Result: N/A Value: 25.7 ms Limit: N/A T0 T1 Upper Sub-Band 5470 MHz - 5725 MHz, 1.2s period Result: Pass Value: < 260 ms Limit: ≤ 260 ms aggregate T1 T2 Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 19/21

NORTHWEST XMit 2010.11.03 EMC DFS CHANNEL SHUTDOWN, MOVE, NON-OCCUPANCY Upper Sub-Band 5470 MHz - 5725 MHz, 12.5s period Result: Pass Value: < 1 second Limit: ≤ 10 seconds T1 T2 Upper Sub-Band 5470 MHz - 5725 MHz, 30 minute period Result: Pass Value: > 30 Minutes Limit: ≥ 30 Minutes T2 T3 Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 20/21

NORTHWEST System Block Diagram EMC Radar Test Spectrum Analyzer gnal Generator Attenuator Attenuator Attenuator Attenuator 2-W ay Splitter 2-W ay Splitter Step Attenuator Attenuator Step Attenuator Attenuator Attenuator Attenuator Master Client Report No. INMC0648 Rev. 1 21/21


Document Created: 2011-01-11 09:08:08
Document Modified: 2011-01-11 09:08:08
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC