Confidentilaity request

FCC ID: DGFTTS9100

Cover Letter(s)

Download: PDF
FCCID_1421280

February 1, 2011

Mr. Yuriy Litvinov
TCB Reviewer
Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc.
7250 Hudson Blvd. Suite 100
Oakdale, MN 55128

Re:     FCC ID number:      DGFTTS9100
        Industry Canada IC: 458A-TTS9100

Request for Confidential Treatment

Dear Yuriy:

3M requests that the material described below be withheld from public disclosure in
accordance with Industry Canada RSP-100 section 10, following the grant of
application. In support of this request, 3M submits the following:

1.    Identification of the specific information for which confidential treatment is sought:

      Reader schematics under file name: 9100 Schematics.pdf

      Reader bill of materials under file name: 9100 Parts List.pdf

      Reader block diagram under file name: 9100 Reader Block Diagram.pdf

      Circuit description under file name: 9100 Reader Operational Description.pdf

      Reader internal photographs under file name: 9100 Internal Photos.jpg

2.    Explanation of the degree to which the information is commercial or financial, or
      contains a trade secret or is privileged:

      This material includes circuit diagrams (schematics) and circuit descriptions. As
      such, this material is treated as highly confidential business information. The
      Reader is a proprietary design that is held in strict confidentiality. The material for
      which confidentiality is sought is employed in the design and manufacture of radio
      frequency identification equipment that is offered on a competitive basis. Customers
      for this equipment have a variety of competing sources of supply.

3.    Explanation of how disclosure of the information could result in substantial
      competitive harm:
      Disclosure would, in effect, give away the design efforts of the 3M engineering
      personal, who have designed the equipment and manufacturing process.
      Disclosure would offer competitors additional unwarranted insight into the state of


     the product development that would allow those competitors an advantage that
     would not be available to 3M.

4.   Identification of any measures taken to the submitting party to prevent unauthorized
     disclosure:

     The information for which confidential treatment is sought is kept confidential to 3M
     and not made available to any third parties except in pursuant to non-disclosure
     agreements.

5.   Identification of whether the information is available to the public and the extent of
     any previous disclosure of the information to third parties:

     To the knowledge of those preparing this application, the information has not been
     disclosed publicly. While the general theory of the operation of this RFID equipment
     has been the subject of numerous disclosures in industry and standards groups as
     well as in rule making proceedings, the protection sought is narrowly drawn and
     pertains to certain specific implementations of RFID Technology.

6.   Justification of the period during which the submitting party asserts that material
     should not be available for public disclosure:

     This material should not be disclosed for at least 5 years. While improvements in
     design are made relatively frequently, disclosure of the design information would
     lead to insights into both design and manufacturing techniques and could have an
     adverse competitive effect for many years to come. This equipment is designed for
     commercial, industrial, and government applications. As such, it is important that its
     design not be made available to unauthorized persons who might attempt to use
     this knowledge of the design to compromise the applications for which the
     equipment will be employed.

7.   Any other information that the party seeking confidential treatment believes may be
     useful in assessing whether its request for confidentiality should be granted. Note
     that the equipment for which approval is being sought will be employed in
     applications that inherently carry a premium of security.

Respectfully submitted,

Robert E.         Digitally signed by Robert E. Heller
                  DN: cn=Robert E. Heller, c=US,
                  o=EMC Lab, ou=SEMS,

Heller            email=reheller@mmm.com
                  Date: 2011.02.03 04:50:15 -06'00'


Robert E. Heller
Senior EMC Engineer, 3M Company



Document Created: 2011-02-03 04:50:16
Document Modified: 2011-02-03 04:50:16

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC