Exhibit E Test Measurement Report per 2 1033 b6

FCC ID: BJ4-4700

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_3965907

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 Measurement of RF Emissions from a LED Decorative Fixture with RF Communication Model No. 4700 Transmitter For HeathCo LLC 2445 Nashville Rd Bowling Green, KY 42102 P.O. Number M001849 Date Tested July 23 and 24, 2018 Test Personnel Richard King Test Specification FCC "Code of Federal Regulations" Title 47, Part 15, Subpart C, Section 15.249 for Digital Modulation Intentional Radiators Operating within the bands 902-928MHz Industry Canada RSS-GEN Industry Canada RSS-210 Test Report By: Richard King EMC Engineer Requested By: Jeff Bessinger HeathCo LLC Approved By: Raymond J. Klouda Registered Professional Engineer of Illinois - 44894

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS PARAGRAPH DESCRIPTION OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Scope of Tests ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3. Deviations, Additions and Exclusions .................................................................................................. 5 1.4. EMC Laboratory Identification ............................................................................................................. 5 1.5. Laboratory Conditions.......................................................................................................................... 5 2. Applicable Documents.................................................................................................................................. 5 3. EUT Setup and Operation ............................................................................................................................ 6 3.1. General Description ............................................................................................................................. 6 3.1.1. Power Input ................................................................................................................................. 6 3.1.2. Grounding ................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2. Operational Mode ................................................................................................................................ 6 3.3. EUT Modifications................................................................................................................................ 6 4. Test Facility and Test Instrumentation ......................................................................................................... 6 4.1. Shielded Enclosure .............................................................................................................................. 6 4.2. Test Instrumentation ............................................................................................................................ 6 4.3. Calibration Traceability ........................................................................................................................ 6 4.4. Measurement Uncertainty ................................................................................................................... 6 5. Test Procedures ........................................................................................................................................... 7 5.1. Powerline Conducted Emissions ......................................................................................................... 7 5.1.1. Requirements .............................................................................................................................. 7 5.1.2. Procedures .................................................................................................................................. 7 5.1.3. Results ........................................................................................................................................ 8 5.2. 99% Bandwidth .................................................................................................................................... 8 5.2.1. Requirement................................................................................................................................ 8 5.2.2. Procedures .................................................................................................................................. 8 5.2.3. Results ........................................................................................................................................ 8 5.3. Duty Cycle Factor Measurements ....................................................................................................... 8 5.3.1. Requirements .............................................................................................................................. 8 5.3.2. Procedures .................................................................................................................................. 8 5.3.3. Results ........................................................................................................................................ 9 5.4. Radiated Spurious Emissions Measurements ..................................................................................... 9 5.4.1. Requirements .............................................................................................................................. 9 5.4.2. Procedures .................................................................................................................................. 9 5.4.3. Results ...................................................................................................................................... 10 5.5. Band Edge Compliance ..................................................................................................................... 10 5.5.1. Requirement.............................................................................................................................. 10 5.5.2. Procedures ................................................................................................................................ 10 5.5.2.1 Full Band Edge ..................................................................................................................... 10 5.5.3. Results ...................................................................................................................................... 11 6. Other Test Conditions ................................................................................................................................ 11 THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF ELITE ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING INCORPORATED. Page 2 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS PARAGRAPH DESCRIPTION OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. 6.1. Test Personnel and Witnesses .......................................................................................................... 11 6.2. Disposition of the EUT ....................................................................................................................... 11 7. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................ 11 8. Certification................................................................................................................................................. 11 9. Equipment List ............................................................................................................................................ 12 THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF ELITE ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING INCORPORATED. Page 3 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 REVISION HISTORY Revision Date Description — 10 AUG 2018 Initial release Page 4 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 Measurement of RF Emissions from a LED Decorative Fixture with RF Communication, Model No. 4700 Transmitter 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Scope of Tests This report represents the results of the series of radio interference measurements performed on a HeathCo LLC LED Decorative Fixture with RF Communication, Model No. 4700 transmitter (hereinafter referred to as the EUT). The EUT is a digital modulation transmitter. The transmitter was designed to transmit in the 902-928 MHz band using an internal antenna. The EUT was manufactured and submitted for testing by HeathCo LLC located in Bowling Green, KY. 1.2. Purpose The test series was performed to determine if the EUT meets the conducted and radiated RF emission requirements of the FCC "Code of Federal Regulations" Title 47, Part 15, Subpart C, Sections 15.207 and 15.249 for Intentional Radiators. The test series was also performed to determine if the EUT meets the conducted RF emission requirements of the Industry Canada Radio Standards Specification, RSS-Gen, Section 7.2.4 and the radiated RF emission requirements of the Industry Canada Radio Standards Specification, RSS-210, Annex 8 for transmitters. Testing was performed in accordance with ANSI C63.4- 2014. 1.3. Deviations, Additions and Exclusions There were no deviations, additions to, or exclusions from the test specification during this test series. 1.4. EMC Laboratory Identification This series of tests was performed by Elite Electronic Engineering Incorporated of Downers Grove, Illinois. The laboratory is accredited by The American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA). A2LA Certificate Number: 1786.01. 1.5. Laboratory Conditions The temperature at the time of the test was 23.5oC and the relative humidity was 35%. 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS The following documents of the exact issue designated form part of this document to the extent specified herein: - Federal Communications Commission "Code of Federal Regulations", Title 47, Part 15, Subpart C - ANSI C63.4-2014, "American National Standard for Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz" - Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory Division Guidance for Performing Compliance Measurements on Digital Transmission Systems (DTS) Operating Under Section 15.247, October 4, 2012 - Industry Canada Radio Standards Specification, RSS-Gen, “General Requirements for Compliance of Radio Apparatus”, Issue 5, April 2018 - Industry Canada Radio Standards Specification, RSS-210, “License-Exempt Radio Apparatus: Category I Equipment”, Issue 9, November 2017 Page 5 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 3. EUT SETUP AND OPERATION 3.1. General Description The EUT is a HeathCo LLC LED Decorative Fixture with RF Communication, Model No. 4700. A block diagram of the EUT setup is shown as Figure 1. A photograph of the EUT is shown as Figure 2. 3.1.1.Power Input The EUT obtained 115V 60Hz power via a 2-wire, 2m, unshielded power cord. 3.1.2.Grounding The EUT was ungrounded during the tests. 3.2. Operational Mode For all tests, the EUT was placed on an 80cm high non-conductive stand. The EUT was energized. The unit was programmed to operate in one of the following modes: - Transmit at 915MHz Normal Operation – The EUT is powered on and set to transmit at 915MHz. The lightbulb on the unit was not powered. 3.3. EUT Modifications No modifications were required for compliance to the FCC "Code of Federal Regulations" Title 47, Part 15, Subpart C, Sections 15.207 and 15.249. 4. TEST FACILITY AND TEST INSTRUMENTATION 4.1. Shielded Enclosure All tests were performed in a 32ft. x 20ft. x 18ft. hybrid ferrite-tile/anechoic absorber lined test chamber. With the exception of the floor, the reflective surfaces of the shielded chamber are lined with ferrite tiles on the walls and ceiling. Anechoic absorber material is installed over the ferrite tile. The floor of the chamber is used as the ground plane. The chamber complies with ANSI C63.4-2014 for site attenuation. 4.2. Test Instrumentation The test instrumentation and auxiliary equipment used during the tests are listed in Table 9-1. Conducted and radiated emission measurements were performed with a spectrum analyzer. This receiver allows measurements with the bandwidths and detector functions specified by the FCC. 4.3. Calibration Traceability Test equipment is maintained and calibrated on a regular basis with a calibration interval not greater than two years. All calibrations are traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 4.4. Measurement Uncertainty All measurements are an estimate of their true value. The measurement uncertainty characterizes, with a specified confidence level, the spread of values which may be possible for a given measurement system. Values of Expanded Measurement Uncertainty (95% Confidence) are presented below: Page 6 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 Expanded Measurement Type Measurement Uncertainty Conducted disturbance (mains port) (150 kHz – 30 MHz) 2.7 Radiated disturbance (electric field strength on an open area test site or alternative 4.3 test site) (30 MHz – 1000 MHz) Radiated disturbance (electric field strength on an open area test site or alternative 3.1 test site) (1 GHz – 6 GHz) Radiated disturbance (electric field strength on an open area test site or alternative 3.2 test site) (6 GHz – 18 GHz) 5. TEST PROCEDURES 5.1. Powerline Conducted Emissions 5.1.1.Requirements Per the FCC "Code of Federal Regulations" Title 47, Part 15, Subpart C, Per 15.207(a) and Industry Canada RSS-Gen section 7.2.4, all radio frequency voltages on the power lines of a transmitter shall be below the values shown below when using a quasi-peak or average detector: Frequency Conducted Limit (dBuV) MHz Quasi-peak Average 66 decreasing with 56 decreasing with 0.15 – 0.5 logarithm of frequency to 56 logarithm of frequency to 46 0.5 – 5 56 46 5 – 30 60 50 Note 1: The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. Note 2: If the levels measured using the QP detector meet both the QP and the Average limits, the EUT is considered to have met both requirements and measurements do not need to be performed using the Average detector. 5.1.2.Procedures The interference on each power lead of the EUT was measured by connecting the measuring equipment to the appropriate meter terminal of the Line Impedance Stabilization Network (LISN). The meter terminal of the LISN not under test was terminated with 50 ohms. 1) The EUT was operated in the Normal Operation mode. 2) Measurements were first made on the 120VAC high line. 3) The frequency range from 150 kHz to 30 MHz was broken up into smaller frequency sub-bands. 4) Conducted emissions measurements were taken on the first frequency sub-band using a peak detector. 5) The data thus obtained was then searched by the computer for the highest levels. Any emissions levels that were within 10dB of the average limit were then measured again using both a quasi-peak detector and an average detector. (If no peak readings were within 10dB of the average limit, quasi-peak and average readings were taken on the highest emissions levels measured during the peak detector scan.) Page 7 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 6) Steps (4) and (5) were repeated for the remainder of the frequency sub-bands until the entire frequency range from 150kHz to 30MHz was investigated. The peak trace was automatically plotted. The plot also shows quasi-peak and average readings that were taken on discrete frequencies. A table showing the quasi-peak and average readings was also generated. This tabular data compares the quasi-peak and average conducted emissions to the applicable conducted emissions limits. 7) Steps (3) through (6) were repeated on the 120VAC neutral line. 5.1.3.Results The plots and tabular data of the peak, quasi-peak, and average conducted voltage levels acquired from each input power line with the EUT operated in the Normal Operation mode are shown on pages 18 through 21. All power line conducted emissions measured from the EUT were within the specification limits. Photographs of the test configuration which yielded the highest or worst case, conducted emission levels are shown in Figure 3. 5.2. 99% Bandwidth 5.2.1.Requirement The 99% bandwidth for devices operating above 900MHz shall be within the 902-928MHz band. 5.2.2.Procedures The EUT was setup inside the chamber. The EUT was allowed to transmit continuously. The transmit channel was set separately to low, middle, and high channels. The resolution bandwidth (RBW) was set to 100kHz and the span was set to greater than the RBW. The 'Max-Hold' function was engaged. The analyzer was allowed to scan until the envelope of the transmitter bandwidth was defined. The analyzer's display was plotted using a 'screen dump' utility. 5.2.3.Results The plot on page 22 shows that the 99% bandwidth was measured to be 397.6kHz, which is within the 902- 928MHz band. 5.3. Duty Cycle Factor Measurements 5.3.1.Requirements Unless otherwise specified, when the radiated emission limits are expressed in terms of the average value of the emission, and pulsed operation is employed, the measurement field strength shall be determined by averaging over one complete pulse train, including blanking intervals, as long as the pulse train does not exceed 0.1 seconds. As an alternative (provided the transmitter operates for longer than 0.1 seconds) or in cases where the pulse train exceeds 0.1 seconds, the measured field strength shall be determined from the average absolute voltage during a 0.1 second interval during which the field strength is at its maximum value. The exact method of calculating the average field strength shall be submitted with any application for certification or shall be retained in the measurement data file for equipment subject to notification or verification. 5.3.2.Procedures 1) The EUT was placed on the non-conductive stand and set to transmit continuously. 2) A double ridged waveguide antenna was positioned at a 3 meter distance from the EUT. The output of the antenna was connected to the input of a spectrum analyzer. 3) The center frequency of the spectrum analyzer was set to the transmit frequency of the EUT. 4) The frequency span of the spectrum analyzer was set to 0Hz so that the time domain trace of the transmitted pulse of the EUT was displayed on the spectrum analyzer. 5) The sweep time of the spectrum analyzer was adjusted so that the beginning and end of a single Page 8 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 pulse could be seen on the display of the spectrum analyzer. 6) The single sweep function of the spectrum analyzer was used multiple times to determine the maximum pulse width of the EUT. 7) The maximum pulse width display of the spectrum analyzer was recorded and then plotted using a 'screen dump' utility. 8) The sweep time of the spectrum analyzer was then adjusted to 100msec. 9) The single sweep function of the spectrum analyzer was used multiple times to determine the maximum number of transmitted pulses that occurred in a 100msec time period. 10) The maximum number of pulses transmitted in a 100msec time period was recorded and then plotted using a ‘screen dump’ utility. 11) The duty cycle correction was calculated using the following equation: Duty Cycle Correction Factor (dB) = D.C. (dB) D.C. (dB) = 20 x log [((pulse width (msec)) x (#pulses in a 100msecperiod)) / 100msec] 5.3.3.Results Duty cycle plots are shown on pages 23 and 24. The EUT transmits a 7.2mS pulse followed by a 2.9mS pulse every 16mS (word). Since the word is less than 100msec long, the duty cycle factor was computed over the word interval. This results in a duty cycle correction factor of -4.0dB. 5.4. Radiated Emissions Measurements 5.4.1.Requirements Per section 15.249(a), the field strength of emissions from intentional radiators operated within these frequency bands shall comply with the following: Frequency Field Strength of Fundamental Field Strength of Harmonics MHz (millivolts/meter) (microvolts/meter) 902-928 MHz 50 500 2400-2483.5 MHz 50 500 5725-5875 MHz 50 500 24.0-24.25 GHz 250 250 5.4.2.Procedures All tests were performed in a 32ft. x 20ft. x 18ft. hybrid ferrite-tile/anechoic absorber lined test chamber. The walls and ceiling of the shielded chamber are lined with ferrite tiles. Anechoic absorber material is installed over the ferrite tile. The floor of the chamber is used as the ground plane. The chamber complies with ANSI C63.4-2014 for site attenuation. The shielded enclosure prevents emissions from other sources, such as radio and TV stations from interfering with the measurements. All powerlines and signal lines entering the enclosure pass through filters on the enclosure wall. The powerline filters prevent extraneous signals from entering the enclosure on these leads. Preliminary radiated emissions tests were performed to determine the emission characteristics of the EUT. For the preliminary test, a broadband measuring antenna was positioned at a 3 meter distance from the EUT. The entire frequency range from 30MHz to 10.0GHz was investigated using a peak detector function. The final emission tests were then manually performed over the frequency range of 30MHz to 10.0GHz. 1) For all emissions, the following procedure was used: a) The field strengths of all emissions below 1 GHz were measured using a bi-log antenna. The bi-log antenna was positioned at a 3 meter distance from the EUT. A peak detector with a resolution bandwidth of 100 kHz was used on the spectrum analyzer. b) The field strengths of all emissions above 1 GHz were measured using a double-ridged waveguide Page 9 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 antenna. The waveguide antenna was positioned at a 3 meter distance from the EUT. A peak detector with a resolution bandwidth of 1 MHz was used on the spectrum analyzer. c) To ensure that maximum or worst case emission levels were measured, the following steps were taken when taking all measurements: i) The EUT was rotated so that all of its sides were exposed to the receiving antenna. ii) Since the measuring antenna is linearly polarized, both horizontal and vertical field components were measured. iii) The measuring antenna was raised and lowered for each antenna polarization to maximize the readings. iv) In instances where it was necessary to use a shortened cable between the measuring antenna and the spectrum analyzer, the measuring antenna was not raised or lowered to ensure maximized readings. Instead the EUT was rotated through all axes to ensure the maximum readings were recorded for the EUT. d) For all radiated emissions measurements below 1 GHz, if the peak reading is below the limits listed in 15.249(a), no further measurements are required. If however, the peak readings exceed the limits listed in 15.249(a), then the emissions are remeasured using a quasi-peak detector. e) For all radiated emissions measurements above 1 GHz, the peak readings must comply with the 15.35(b) limits. 15.35(b) states that when average radiated emissions measurements are specified, there also is a limit on the peak level of the radiated emissions. The limit on the peak radio frequency emissions is 20 dB above the maximum permitted average emission limit applicable to the equipment under test. Therefore, all peak readings above 1 GHz must be no greater than 20 dB above the limits specified in 15.249(a). f) Next, for all radiated emissions measurements above 1GHz, the resolution bandwidth was set to 1MHz. Since the emission is pulsed, the reading were adjusted by the “duty cycle correction factor” derived from 20*log(on time/100msec). These readings must be no greater than the limits specified in 15.249(a). 5.4.3.Results Preliminary radiated emissions plots with the EUT transmitting at 915MHz are shown on pages 25 through 30. Final radiated emissions data are presented on data pages 31 and 32. As can be seen from the data, all emissions measured from the EUT were within the specification limits. Photographs of the test configuration which yielded the highest, or worst case, radiated emission levels are shown in Figures 4 and 5. 5.5. Band Edge Compliance 5.5.1.Requirement Emissions radiated outside of the specified frequency bands, except for harmonics, shall be attenuated by at least 50 dB below the level of the fundamental or to the general radiated emission limits in §15.209, whichever is the lesser attenuation. 5.5.2.Procedures 5.5.2.1 Full Band Edge 1) The EUT was setup inside the test chamber on a non-conductive stand. 2) A broadband measuring antenna was placed at a test distance of 3 meters from the EUT. 3) The EUT was set to transmit continuously. 4) The EUT was maximized for worst case emissions at the measuring antenna. The maximum peak meter reading was recorded. 5) To determine the band edge compliance, the peak total in dBuV/m was compared to the QP total limit is dBuV/m. 6) A plot of the emission as compared to the operational band is show with the following settings: a) Center frequency = transmitter frequency. b) Span = Wide enough to capture the peak level of the emission operating on the Page 10 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 channel closest to the band-edges, as well as any modulation products which fall outside of the authorized band of operation. c) The 'Max-Hold' function was engaged. The analyzer was allowed to scan until the envelope of the transmitter bandwidth was defined. d) The marker was set on the peak of the in-band emissions. A display line was placed 20dB down from the peak of the in-band emissions. The display line is only shown for reference. All emissions which fall outside of the authorized band of operation must be 50dB down or to the general limit. e) The analyzer's display was plotted using a 'screen dump' utility. 5.5.3.Results Pages 33 and 34 show the radiated band-edge compliance results. As can be seen from data, the emissions at the low end band-edge and the high end band-edge are within the general limits. 6. OTHER TEST CONDITIONS 6.1. Test Personnel and Witnesses All tests were performed by qualified personnel from Elite Electronic Engineering Incorporated. The test series was witnessed by HeathCo LLC personnel. 6.2. Disposition of the EUT The EUT and all associated equipment were returned to HeathCo LLC upon completion of the tests. 7. CONCLUSIONS It was determined that the HeathCo LLC LED Decorative Fixture with RF Communication, Model No. 4700 digital modulation transmitter did fully meet the conducted and radiated emission requirements of the FCC "Code of Federal Regulations" Title 47, Part 15, Subpart C, Sections 15.207 and 15.249 for Intentional Radiators Operating within the 902-928 MHz band, when tested per ANSI C63.4-2014. It was also determined that the HeathCo LLC LED Decorative Fixture with RF Communication, Model No. 4700 digital modulation transmitter did fully meet the conducted and radiated RF emission requirements of the Industry Canada Radio Standards Specification, RSS-Gen Section 7.2.4 and RSS-210 Annex 8, for transmitters, when tested per ANSI C63.4-2014. 8. CERTIFICATION Elite Electronic Engineering Incorporated certifies that the information contained in this report was obtained under conditions which meet or exceed those specified in the test specifications. The data presented in this test report pertains to the EUT at the test date as operated by HeathCo LLC personnel. Any electrical or mechanical modification made to the EUT subsequent to the specified test date will serve to invalidate the data and void this certification. This report must not be used to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the Federal Government. Page 11 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 9. EQUIPMENT LIST Table 9-1 Equipment List Eq ID Equipment Description Manufacturer Model No. Serial No. Frequency Range Cal Date Due Date PE2-35-120- APW10 PREAMPLIFIER PMI PL9609/1139 1GHZ-20GHZ 4/5/2018 4/5/2019 5R0-10-12-SFF NTA3 BILOG ANTENNA TESEQ 6112D 32853 25-1000MHz 9/11/2017 9/11/2018 DOUBLE RIDGED WAVEGUIDE NWQ0 ETS LINDGREN 3117 66657 1GHZ-18GHZ 5/31/2018 5/31/2020 ANTENNA PLF2 CISPR16 50UH LISN ELITE CISPR16/70A 002 .15-30MHz 5/7/2018 5/7/2019 PLF4 CISPR16 50UH LISN ELITE CISPR16/70A 003 .15-30MHz 5/7/2018 5/7/2019 RBG2 EMI ANALYZER ROHDE & SCHWARZ ESW44 101591 2HZ-44GHZ 2/23/2018 2/23/2019 RBJ2 EMI RECEIVER ROHDE & SCHWARZ ESW8 100987 2HZ-8GHZ 1/18/2018 1/18/2019 T1E1 10DB 25W ATTENUATOR WEINSCHEL 46-10-43 AU1883 DC-18GHZ 6/28/2018 6/28/2020 4IH30- XPQ2 HIGH PASS FILTER K&L MICROWAVE 3 1.8-10GHZ 9/12/2017 9/12/2019 1804/T10000-0 I/O: Initial Only N/A: Not Applicable Note 1: For the purpose of this test, the equipment was calibrated over the specified frequency range, pulse rate, or modulation prior to the test or monitored by a calibrated instrument. Page 12 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 Anechoic Ferrite Chamber DUT rs mete 3 Receive Antenna Hpib cbl Turn Table & Mast Controller Computer Printer Spectrum Analyzer FIGURE 1 BLOCKDIAGRAM OF TEST SETUP Page 13 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 Figure 2 Photograph of EUT Page 14 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 Figure 3 Test Setup for Conducted Emissions Page 15 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 Figure 4 Test Setup for Radiated Emissions, 30MHz to 1GHz – Horizontal Polarization Test Setup for Radiated Emissions, 30MHz to 1GHz – Vertical Polarization Page 16 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 Figure 5 Test Setup for Radiated Emissions, 1 to 10GHz – Horizontal Polarization Test Setup for Radiated Emissions, 1 to 10GHz – Vertical Polarization Page 17 of 34

Ets Engineering Test Report No. 1802692—01 FCC Part 15 Subpart B Conducted Emissions Test Significant Emissions Data VBRS8 04/23/2015 Manufacturer : HeathCo Model : 4700 Serial Number : #8 DUT Mode : _Tx @ 915MH2z Line Tested L1 Scan Step Time [ms] : 30 Meas. Threshold [dB] : —1 Notes : FULL Test Engineer : R. King Limit : Class B Test Date : Jul 23, 2018 10:49:53 AM Data Filter : Up to 80 maximum levels detected with 6 dB level excursion threshold over 1 dB margin below Iimit Page 18 of 34

‘ Enginering Test Report No. 1002502.01 Elite FCC Part 15 Subpart B Conducted Emissions Test Cumulative Data Manfacturer HeathCo Moel 4700 Seral Number #3 DUT Mode Ts @ orsune Line Tested u1 Scan Step Time (ms] 30 Meas. Threshold [8G) —1 Notes ruu. Test Engineer R. King Linik Class 8 Test Date Jul 23, 2ota 10.40.59 AM ELTTE ELECTRONTC ENGTNEERING Trc. 1« ws mvesous Donere Srave, Tt 315 ree his se c un Linis —ve Linis + 07 Meossresent tee * Ave Messursnant Pack Trace 1se so VoTdage sou0 28 antneacmoesmaintnbmtturaintinevnieniiatintinnd s ze io strt = a.is Fraquancy ic srom = 30 Emissions Mest QP Limt Emissions Mect Ave Linit Fage 19 of 3

Ets Engineering Test Report No. 1802692—01 FCC Part 15 Subpart B Conducted Emissions Test Significant Emissions Data VBRS8 04/23/2015 Manufacturer : HeathCo Model : 4700 Serial Number : #8 DUT Mode : _Tx @ 915MH2z Line Tested : L2 Scan Step Time [ms] : 30 Meas. Threshold [dB] : —1 Notes : FULL Test Engineer : R. King Limit : Class B Test Date : Jul 23, 2018 10:43:25 AM Data Filter : Up to 80 maximum levels detected with 6 dB level excursion threshold over 1 dB margin below Iimit Page 20 of 34

‘ Enginering Test Report No. 1002502.01 Elite FCC Part 15 Subpart B Conducted Emissions Test Cumulative Data Manfacturer HeathCo Moel 4700 Seral Number #3 DUT Mode Ts @ orsune Line Tested e Scan Step Time (ms] 30 Meas. Threshold [8G) —1 Notes ruu. Test Engineer R. King Linik Class 8 Test Date Jul 23, 2ote 10.29.25 AM ELTTE ELECTRONTC ENGTNEERING Trc. 1« ws mvesous Donere Srave, Tt 315 ree his se c un Linis —ve Linis + 07 Meossresent tee * Ave Messursnant Pack Trace 1se so VoTdage sou0 28 sc s ze io strt = a.is Fraquancy ic srom = 30 Emissions Mest QP Limt Emissions Mect Ave Linit Fage 21 o 3

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 OCCUPIED BANDWIDTH – 99% BANDWIDTH MANUFACTURER : HeathCo LLC TEST ITEM : LED Decorative Fixture with RF Communication MODEL NUMBER : 4700 TEST MODE : Normal Operation – 915MHz : 99% BW = 397.6kHz NOTES Page 22 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 DUTY CYCLE MANUFACTURER : HeathCo LLC TEST ITEM : LED Decorative Fixture with RF Communication MODEL NUMBER : 4700 TEST MODE : Normal Operation – 915MHz : ON Time = 7.2mS+(13.0-10.1)= 10.1mS : Word = 16mS : Duty Cycle = 20*log((7.2mS+2.9mS)/16mS) = -3.99 dB NOTES Page 23 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 DUTY CYCLE MANUFACTURER : HeathCo LLC TEST ITEM : LED Decorative Fixture with RF Communication MODEL NUMBER : 4700 TEST MODE : Normal Operation – 915MHz : ON Time = 7.2mS+(13.0-10.1)= 10.1mS : Word = 16mS : Duty Cycle = 20*log((7.2mS+2.9mS)/16mS) = -3.99 dB NOTES Page 24 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 Page 25 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 Page 26 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 Page 27 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 Page 28 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 Page 29 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 Page 30 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 DATA PAGE Manufacturer : HeathCo LLC Test Item : LED Decorative Fixture with RF Communication Model No. : 4700 Mode : Normal Operation – Transmit at 915MHz Test Specification : FCC-15.249, RSS-210 Radiated Spurious Emissions - Harmonics Date : July 23, 2018 QP/Peak QP/Peak QP/Peak Meter CBL Ant Pre Total Total Limit Freq. Ant Reading Fac Fac Amp dBuV/m uV/m uV/m Margin MHz Pol (dBuV) Ambient (dB) (dB) (dB) at 3m at 3 m at 3 m (dB) 915.000 H 58.6 1.6 27.0 0.0 87.2 22922.1 50000.0 -6.8 915.000 V 64.0 1.6 27.0 0.0 92.6 42486.9 50000.0 -1.4 1830.000 H 49.5 * 2.2 31.1 -41.1 41.8 122.8 5000.0 -32.2 1830.000 V 49.5 * 2.2 31.1 -41.1 41.8 123.0 5000.0 -32.2 2745.000 H 51.7 * 2.8 33.7 -40.9 47.4 233.8 5000.0 -26.6 2745.000 V 53.9 * 2.8 33.7 -40.9 49.6 300.5 5000.0 -24.4 3660.000 H 49.4 * 3.3 34.6 -40.3 46.9 220.6 5000.0 -27.1 3660.000 V 50.0 * 3.3 34.6 -40.3 47.6 238.6 5000.0 -26.4 4575.000 H 54.2 3.6 36.2 -40.6 53.5 471.3 5000.0 -20.5 4575.000 V 51.0 * 3.6 36.2 -40.6 50.2 325.3 5000.0 -23.7 5490.000 H 49.6 * 3.9 36.8 -40.1 50.2 325.0 5000.0 -23.7 5490.000 V 48.8 * 3.9 36.8 -40.1 49.4 296.4 5000.0 -24.5 6405.000 H 49.1 * 4.3 38.0 -40.2 51.2 363.7 5000.0 -22.8 6405.000 V 49.1 * 4.3 38.0 -40.2 51.2 362.0 5000.0 -22.8 7320.000 H 50.6 * 4.7 38.1 -40.3 53.0 448.9 5000.0 -20.9 7320.000 V 48.7 * 4.7 38.1 -40.3 51.2 362.7 5000.0 -22.8 8235.000 H 48.4 * 4.9 38.6 -40.4 51.5 377.6 5000.0 -22.4 8235.000 V 48.2 * 4.9 38.6 -40.4 51.3 367.3 5000.0 -22.7 9150.000 H 47.7 * 5.0 38.9 -40.3 51.3 365.8 5000.0 -22.7 9150.000 V 47.5 * 5.0 38.9 -40.3 51.0 355.4 5000.0 -23.0 1039.500 H 54.2 1.7 29.0 -42.3 42.7 135.9 5000.0 -31.3 1039.500 V 61.2 1.7 29.0 -42.3 49.6 303.1 5000.0 -24.3 Checked BY : ________________________________ Richard E. King Page 31 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 DATA PAGE Manufacturer : HeathCo LLC Test Item : LED Decorative Fixture with RF Communication Model No. : 4700 Mode : Normal Operation – Transmit at 915MHz Test Specification : FCC-15.249, RSS-210 Radiated Spurious Emissions – Averages Date : May 17, 2018 Average Average Average Meter CBL Ant Pre Duty Total Total Limit Freq. Ant Reading Fac Fac Amp Cycle dBuV/m uV/m uV/m Margin MHz Pol (dBuV) Ambient (dB) (dB) (dB) (dB) at 3m at 3 m at 3 m (dB) 1830.00 H 49.5 * 2.2 31.1 -41.1 -4.0 37.8 77.5 500.0 -16.2 1830.00 V 49.5 * 2.2 31.1 -41.1 -4.0 37.8 77.7 500.0 -16.2 2745.00 H 51.7 * 2.8 33.7 -40.9 -4.0 43.4 147.7 500.0 -10.6 2745.00 V 53.88 * 2.8 33.7 -40.9 -4.0 45.6 189.8 500.0 -8.4 3660.00 H 49.35 * 3.3 34.6 -40.3 -4.0 42.9 139.4 500.0 -11.1 3660.00 V 50.03 * 3.3 34.6 -40.3 -4.0 43.6 150.7 500.0 -10.4 4575.00 H 54.24 3.6 36.2 -40.6 -4.0 49.5 297.7 500.0 -4.5 4575.00 V 51.02 * 3.6 36.2 -40.6 -4.0 46.3 205.5 500.0 -7.7 5490.00 H 49.58 * 3.9 36.8 -40.1 -4.0 46.2 205.3 500.0 -7.7 5490.00 V 48.78 * 3.9 36.8 -40.1 -4.0 45.4 187.2 500.0 -8.5 6405.00 H 49.13 * 4.3 38.0 -40.2 -4.0 47.2 229.7 500.0 -6.8 6405.00 V 49.09 * 4.3 38.0 -40.2 -4.0 47.2 228.7 500.0 -6.8 7320.00 H 50.55 * 4.7 38.1 -40.3 -4.0 49.1 283.5 500.0 -4.9 7320.00 V 48.7 * 4.7 38.1 -40.3 -4.0 47.2 229.1 500.0 -6.8 8235.00 H 48.42 * 4.9 38.6 -40.4 -4.0 47.5 238.5 500.0 -6.4 8235.00 V 48.18 * 4.9 38.6 -40.4 -4.0 47.3 232.0 500.0 -6.7 9150.00 H 47.72 * 5.0 38.9 -40.3 -4.0 47.3 231.1 500.0 -6.7 9150.00 V 47.47 * 5.0 38.9 -40.3 -4.0 47.0 224.5 500.0 -7.0 1039.50 H 54.21 1.7 29.0 -42.3 -4.0 38.7 85.8 500.0 -15.3 1039.50 V 61.18 1.7 29.0 -42.3 -4.0 45.6 191.5 500.0 -8.3 Checked BY : ________________________________ Richard E. King Page 32 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 BAND EDGE MANUFACTURER : HeathCo LLC TEST ITEM : LED Decorative Fixture with RF Communication MODEL NUMBER : 4700 TEST MODE : Normal Operation – 915MHz : NOTES Page 33 of 34

Engineering Test Report No. 1802692-01 DATA PAGE Manufacturer : HeathCo LLC Test Item : LED Decorative Fixture with RF Communication Model No. : 4700 Mode : Normal Operation – Transmit at 915MHz Test Specification : FCC-15.249, RSS-210 Band-edge Compliance Date : May 17, 2018 : Peak reading met the quasi-peak limit QP/Peak QP/Peak QP/Peak Meter CBL Ant Pre Total Total Limit Freq. Ant Reading Fac Fac Amp dBuV/m uV/m uV/m Margin MHz Pol (dBuV) Ambient (dB) (dB) (dB) at 3m at 3 m at 3 m (dB) 902.000 V 16.5 * 1.5 26.8 0.0 44.8 173.7 200.0 -1.2 930.000 V 16.4 * 1.6 27.3 0.0 45.3 183.4 200.0 -0.8 Checked BY : ________________________________ Richard E. King Page 34 of 34


Document Created: 2019-09-11 07:56:37
Document Modified: 2019-09-11 07:56:37
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC