Test Report - 2.4GHz WLAN part 2

FCC ID: BCGA2116

Test Report

Download: PDF

FCCID_4204168

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: UL-RPT-RP12505086JD09A

VERSION 1.0 ISSUE DATE: 04 JANUARY 2019

Transmitter Power Spectral Density (continued)
Results: 802.11n / HT20 / MIMO / 3Tx CDD / BPSK / MCS0

PSD on Core 0 PSD on Core 1 PSD on Core 2
Channel
(dBm / 3 kHz) (dBm / 3 kHz) (dBm / 3 kHz)
1 -16.1 -16.1 -16.2
2 -13.1 -13.3 -13.2
3 -11.9 -12.2 -11.7
6 -10.1 -10.7 -10.2
7 -9.8 -10.4 -10.2
11 -17.2 -17.4 -17.3
12 -19.9 -20.5 -20.2

Combined PSD PSD Limit Margin
Channel Result
(dBm / 3 kHz) (dBm / 3 kHz) (dB)
1 -11.5 8.0 19.5 Complied
2 -8.5 8.0 16.5 Complied
3 -7.1 8.0 15.1 Complied
6 -5.7 8.0 13.7 Complied
7 -5.4 8.0 13.4 Complied
11 -12.6 8.0 20.6 Complied
12 -15.4 8.0 23.4 Complied

PSD on Core 0 PSD on Core 1 PSD on Core 2
Channel
(dBm / 100 kHz) (dBm / 100 kHz) (dBm / 100 kHz)
13 -16.2 -16.2 -16.4

Combined PSD PSD Limit Margin
Channel Result
(dBm / 100 kHz) (dBm / 3 kHz) (dB)
13 -11.6 8.0 19.6 Complied

UL VS LTD Page 59 of 160

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: UL-RPT-RP12505086JD09A

VERSION 1.0 ISSUE DATE: 04 JANUARY 2019

Transmitter Power Spectral Density (continued)
Results: 802.11n / HT20 / MIMO / 2Tx TxBF / BPSK / MCS0
Core 1 Core 2

Channel PSD Duty cycle Corrected PSD Duty cycle Corrected
(dBm / 100 correction PSD (dBm / (dBm / 100 correction PSD (dBm /
kHz) factor (dB) 100 kHz) kHz) factor (dB) 100 kHz)

1 -6.2 0.1 -6.1 -6.4 0.1 -6.3
2 -3.6 0.1 -3.5 -3.9 0.1 -3.8
3 -1.8 0.1 -1.7 -0.2 0.1 -0.1
6 0.8 0.1 0.9 0.9 0.1 1.0
7 0.2 0.1 0.3 -0.2 0.1 -0.1
11 -6.8 0.1 -6.7 -7.0 0.1 -6.9
12 -11.5 0.1 -11.4 -12.8 0.1 -12.7
13 -17.5 0.1 -17.4 -18.4 0.1 -18.3

Corrected Corrected
Combined
PSD PSD Limit Margin
Channel PSD (dBm / Result
Core 1 (dBm / Core 2 (dBm / (dBm / 3 kHz) (dB)
100 kHz)
100 kHz) 100 kHz)

1 -6.1 -6.3 -3.2 8.0 11.2 Complied
2 -3.5 -3.8 -0.6 8.0 8.6 Complied
3 -1.7 -0.1 2.2 8.0 5.8 Complied
6 0.9 1.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 Complied
7 0.3 -0.1 3.1 8.0 4.9 Complied
11 -6.7 -6.9 -3.8 8.0 11.8 Complied
12 -11.4 -12.7 -9.0 8.0 17.0 Complied
13 -17.4 -18.3 -14.8 8.0 22.8 Complied

Page 66 of 160 UL VS LTD

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: UL-RPT-RP12505086JD09A

VERSION 1.0 ISSUE DATE: 04 JANUARY 2019

Transmitter Power Spectral Density (continued)
Results: 802.11n / HT20 / MIMO / 3Tx TxBF / BPSK / MCS0
Core 0 Core 1

Channel PSD Duty cycle Corrected PSD Duty cycle Corrected
(dBm / 100 correction PSD (dBm / (dBm / 100 correction PSD (dBm /
kHz) factor (dB) 100 kHz) kHz) factor (dB) 100 kHz)

1 -7.0 0.1 -6.9 -6.5 0.1 -6.4
2 -4.0 0.1 -3.9 -4.6 0.1 -4.5
3 -2.5 0.1 -2.4 -2.3 0.1 -2.2
6 -0.1 0.1 0.0 -0.6 0.1 -0.5
7 -0.5 0.1 -0.4 -0.6 0.1 -0.5
11 -7.5 0.1 -7.4 -7.7 0.1 -7.6
12 -10.7 0.1 -10.6 -10.5 0.1 -10.4
13 -17.6 0.1 -17.5 -17.6 0.1 -17.5

Core 2 Core 0, Core 1 & Core 2
Corrected Corrected Corrected
Channel PSD Duty cycle Corrected
PSD at Core 0 PSD at Core 1 PSD at Core 2
(dBm / 100 correction PSD (dBm /
(dBm / (dBm / (dBm /
kHz) factor (dB) 100 kHz)
100 kHz) 100 kHz) 100 kHz)

1 -7.3 0.1 -7.2 -6.9 -6.4 -7.2
2 -4.3 0.1 -4.2 -3.9 -4.5 -4.2
3 -2.3 0.1 -2.2 -2.4 -2.2 -2.2
6 -1.0 0.1 -0.9 0.0 -0.5 -0.9
7 -1.0 0.1 -0.9 -0.4 -0.5 -0.9
11 -8.2 0.1 -8.1 -7.4 -7.6 -8.1
12 -11.4 0.1 -11.3 -10.6 -10.4 -11.3
13 -18.3 0.1 -18.2 -17.5 -17.5 -18.2

Combined PSD Limit Margin
Channel Result
(dBm / 100 kHz) (dBm / 3 kHz) (dB)

1 -2.0 8.0 10.0 Complied
2 0.6 8.0 7.4 Complied
3 2.5 8.0 5.5 Complied
6 4.3 8.0 3.7 Complied
7 4.2 8.0 3.8 Complied
11 -2.9 8.0 10.9 Complied
12 -6.0 8.0 14.0 Complied
13 -12.9 8.0 20.9 Complied

UL VS LTD Page 71 of 160

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: UL-RPT-RP12505086JD09A

VERSION 1.0 ISSUE DATE: 04 JANUARY 2019

4.4. Transmitter Maximum (Average) Output Power
Test Summary:

Test Engineers: Max Passell, Victor Carmon & Test Dates: 21 November 2018 to
Matthew Botfield 30 November 2018
Test Sample Serial Numbers: C02X2007KFLX & C02WW00WKFMM

FCC Reference: Part 15.247(b)(3)
Test Method Used: FCC KDB 558074 Section 8.3.2.2 referencing ANSI C63.10
Sections 11.9.2.2.2 & 11.9.2.2.4

Environmental Conditions:

Temperature (°C): 20 to 23
Relative Humidity (%): 38 to 51

Page 78 of 160 UL VS LTD

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: UL-RPT-RP12505086JD09A

VERSION 1.0 ISSUE DATE: 04 JANUARY 2019

Transmitter Maximum (Average) Output Power (continued)
Note(s):

1. The customer declared the following data rates to be used for all measurements as:
o 802.11b – DBPSK / 1 Mbps / SISO / Core 1
o 802.11g – BPSK / 6 Mbps / SISO / Core 1
o 802.11n HT20 – BPSK / MCS0 / SISO / Core 1
o 802.11b – MIMO / 2Tx CDD / DBPSK / 1 Mbps / Core 1 & Core 2
o 802.11b – MIMO / 3Tx CDD / DBPSK / 1 Mbps / Core 0, Core 1 & Core 2
o 802.11n HT20 / MIMO / 2Tx CDD / BPSK / MCS0 / Core 1 & Core 2
o 802.11n HT20 / MIMO / 3Tx CDD / BPSK / MCS0 / Core 0, Core 1 & Core 2
o 802.11n HT20 / MIMO / 2Tx TxBF / BPSK / MCS0 / Core 1 & Core 2
o 802.11n HT20 / MIMO / 3Tx TxBF / BPSK / MCS0 / Core 0, Core 1 & Core 2
2. Final measurements were performed using the above configurations on the relevant channels. Additional
channels were tested as requested by the customer.
3. The power has been integrated over the 99% emission bandwidth. Plots for the occupied bandwidth are
archived on the company server and available for inspection upon request.
4. For 802.11b non-TxBF modes, the EUT was transmitting at >98% duty cycle and testing was performed
in accordance with ANSI C63.10 Section 11.9.2.2.2 Method AVGSA-1. The signal analyser’s integration
function was used to integrate across the 99% occupied bandwidth. The signal analyser resolution
bandwidth was set to 300 kHz and video bandwidth 1 MHz. An RMS detector was used and sweep time
set manually to perform trace averaging over 200 traces. The span was set to at least 1.5 times the 99%
occupied emission bandwidth.
5. For 802.11g and 802.11n HT20 non-TxBF modes, the EUT was transmitting at >98% duty cycle and
testing was performed in accordance with ANSI C63.10 Section 11.9.2.2.2 Method AVGSA-1. The signal
analyser’s integration function was used to integrate across the 99% occupied bandwidth. The signal
analyser resolution bandwidth was set to 500 kHz and video bandwidth 2 MHz. An RMS detector was
used and sweep time set manually to perform trace averaging over 200 traces. The span was set to at
least 1.5 times the 99% occupied emission bandwidth.
6. For TxBF modes, the EUT was transmitting at <98% duty cycle and testing was performed in
accordance with ANSI C63.10 Section 11.9.2.2.4 Method AVGSA-2. The signal analyser’s integration
function was used to integrate across the 99% occupied bandwidth. The signal analyser resolution
bandwidth was set to 500 kHz and video bandwidth 2 MHz. An RMS detector was used and sweep time
set manually to perform trace averaging over 200 traces. The span was set to at least 1.5 times the 99%
occupied emission bandwidth. The calculated duty cycle in section 4.1 was added to the measured
power in order to compute the average power during the actual transmission time.
7. For MIMO modes, conducted power was measured on all ports and then combined using the measure-
and-sum technique stated in FCC KDB 662911 D01 Section E)1). For EIRP, the directional antenna gain
was added to the conducted output power. Detailed calculations can be found in Appendix 1.
8. The signal analyser was connected to the RF port on the EUT using an RF switch, suitable attenuation
and RF cables. An RF offset was entered on the signal analyser to compensate for the loss of the
switch, attenuator and RF cables.
9. For MIMO modes, the limit for conducted output power has been reduced by the same amount in dB that
the directional gain of the antennas exceeds 6 dBi, in accordance with 15.247(b)(4).

UL VS LTD Page 79 of 160

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: UL-RPT-RP12505086JD09A

VERSION 1.0 ISSUE DATE: 04 JANUARY 2019

Transmitter Maximum (Average) Output Power (continued)
Results: 802.11b / 20 MHz / DBPSK / 1 Mbps / SISO / Core 1
Conducted Peak Limit Comparison
Conducted Power
Conducted Power Margin
Channel Limit Result
(dBm) (dB)
(dBm)
1 19.2 30.0 10.8 Complied
2 19.9 30.0 10.1 Complied
3 21.1 30.0 8.9 Complied
6 23.3 30.0 6.7 Complied
7 22.9 30.0 7.1 Complied
11 17.9 30.0 12.1 Complied
12 15.4 30.0 14.6 Complied
13 12.0 30.0 18.0 Complied
EIRP Limit Comparison
Conducted Declared De Facto
EIRP Margin
Channel Power Antenna EIRP Limit Result
(dBm) (dB)
(dBm) Gain (dBi) (dBm)
1 19.2 4.8 24.0 36.0 12.0 Complied
2 19.9 4.8 24.7 36.0 11.3 Complied
3 21.1 4.8 25.9 36.0 10.1 Complied
6 23.3 4.8 28.1 36.0 7.9 Complied
7 22.9 4.8 27.7 36.0 8.3 Complied
11 17.9 4.8 22.7 36.0 13.3 Complied
12 15.4 4.8 20.2 36.0 15.8 Complied
13 12.0 4.8 16.8 36.0 19.2 Complied

Page 80 of 160 UL VS LTD

TEST REPORT SERIAL NO: UL-RPT-RP12505086JD09A

VERSION 1.0 ISSUE DATE: 04 JANUARY 2019

Transmitter Maximum (Average) Output Power (continued)
Results: 802.11g / 20 MHz / BPSK / 6 Mbps / Core 1
Conducted Peak Limit Comparison
Conducted Power
Conducted Power Margin
Channel Limit Result
(dBm) (dB)
(dBm)
1 14.5 30.0 15.5 Complied
2 16.4 30.0 13.6 Complied
3 19.0 30.0 11.0 Complied
6 22.7 30.0 7.3 Complied
7 21.1 30.0 8.9 Complied
11 14.5 30.0 15.5 Complied
12 12.0 30.0 18.0 Complied
13 2.8 30.0 27.2 Complied
EIRP Limit Comparison
Conducted Declared De Facto
EIRP Margin
Channel Power Antenna EIRP Limit Result
(dBm) (dB)
(dBm) Gain (dBi) (dBm)
1 14.5 4.8 19.3 36.0 16.7 Complied
2 16.4 4.8 21.2 36.0 14.8 Complied
3 19.0 4.8 23.8 36.0 12.2 Complied
6 22.7 4.8 27.5 36.0 8.5 Complied
7 21.1 4.8 25.9 36.0 10.1 Complied
11 14.5 4.8 19.3 36.0 16.7 Complied
12 12.0 4.8 16.8 36.0 19.2 Complied
13 2.8 4.8 7.6 36.0 28.4 Complied

UL VS LTD Page 83 of 160

Document Created: 2019-03-24 14:29:22
Document Modified: 2019-03-24 14:29:22

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC