Test Report_DFS

FCC ID: AK8DHURSY63

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_4370948

FCC DFS Test Report FCC ID : AK8DHURSY63 Equipment : 802.11 abgn(ac)+ BT 4.2 combo module Model No. : DHUR-SY63 Brand Name : Wistron NeWeb Corporation Applicant : Sony Corporation Address : 1-7-1 Konan Minato-ku,Tokyo ,108-0075 Japan Standard : 47 CFR FCC Part 15.407 Received Date : May 13, 2019 Tested Date : May 27, 2019 Operating Mode : Client Without Radar Detection We, International Certification Corp., would like to declare that the tested sample has been evaluated and in compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test results contained in this report refer exclusively to the product. It may be duplicated completely for legal use with the approval of the applicant. It shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of our laboratory. Reviewed by: Approved by: Along Chen / Assistant Manager Gary Chang / Manager Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 1 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

Table of Contents 1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Information.............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Support Equipment List .......................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 The Equipment List ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.4 Testing Condition ................................................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Test Standards ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Deviation from Test Standard and Measurement Procedure ................................................................. 7 1.7 Measurement Uncertainty ...................................................................................................................... 7 2 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DFS ............................................................................................ 8 2.1 Applicability of DFS Requirements ......................................................................................................... 8 2.2 DFS Detection Thresholds and Response Requirement ....................................................................... 9 2.3 Radar Test Waveforms ........................................................................................................................10 3 DFS TEST RESULT .............................................................................................................................14 3.1 DFS Detection Threshold levels ...........................................................................................................14 3.2 In-Service Monitoring ...........................................................................................................................15 3.3 Non-Associated ....................................................................................................................................18 4 TEST LABORATORY INFORMATION ...............................................................................................19 Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 2 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

Release Record Report No. Version Description Issued Date FZ950701 Rev. 01 Initial issue Jul. 22, 2019 Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 3 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

Summary of Test Results FCC Rules Description of Test Result FCC 15.407 KDB 905462 D02 Non-Occupancy Period Pass FCC 15.407 KDB 905462 D02 Channel Closing Transmission Time Pass FCC 15.407 KDB 905462 D02 Channel Move Time Pass Declaration of Conformity: The test results with all measurement uncertainty excluded are presented in accordance with the regulation limits or requirements declared by manufacturers. Comments and Explanations: The declared of product specification for EUT presented in the report are provided by the manufacturer, and the manufacturer takes all the responsibilities for the accuracy of product specification. Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 4 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

1 General Description 1.1 Information 1.1.1 Specification of the Equipment under Test (EUT) Frequency Range (GHz) 5.15 ~ 5.25, 5.25 ~ 5.35, 5.47 ~ 5.725 , 5.725 ~ 5.85 Wireless Function 11a / HT20 / HT40/ VHT20 / VHT40 / VHT80 Operating Mode at DFS Band Client without radar detection and ad hoc function Firmware / Software Version V1.0 1.1.2 Antenna Details Operating Frequencies (MHz) / Antenna Gain (dBi) Ant. No. Brand Type Connector 5150~5250 5250~5350 5470~5725 5725~5850 1 Wi-Fi ANT-0 Printed N/A 2.43 3.40 4.35 4.26 2 Wi-Fi ANT-1 Printed N/A 2.58 2.55 2.51 2.65 1.2 Support Equipment List Support Equipment List No. Equipment Brand Name Model Name FCC ID 1 AP (Master) Netgear R6100 PY312400225 2 Notebook DELL LATITUDE-E5420 B6FV9T1 3 Notebook DELL LATITUDE-E6430 9ZFB4X1 Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 5 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

1.3 The Equipment List Test Site (DF01-WS) Instrument Manufacturer Model No. Serial No. Calibration Date Calibration Until Spectrum Analyzer R&S FSV 7 101607 Dec. 20, 2018 Dec. 19, 2019 RF Cable HUBER+SUHNER SUCOFLEX_104 MY15686/4 Oct. 15, 2018 Oct. 14, 2019 RF Cable HUBER+SUHNER SUCOFLEX_104 296081/4 Oct. 17, 2018 Oct. 16, 2019 RF Cable HUBER+SUHNER SUCOFLEX_104 500199/4 Oct. 17, 2018 Oct. 16, 2019 RF Cable HUBER+SUHNER SUCOFLEX_104 500202/4 Oct. 17, 2018 Oct. 16, 2019 RF Cable HUBER+SUHNER SUCOFLEX_104 296088/4 Oct. 17, 2018 Oct. 16, 2019 RF Cable HUBER+SUHNER SUCOFLEX_104 329023/4 Oct. 17, 2018 Oct. 16, 2019 RF Cable HUBER+SUHNER SUCOFLEX_104 329021/4 Oct. 17, 2018 Oct. 16, 2019 Vector signal R&S SMJ100A 100498 Dec. 26, 2018 Dec. 25, 2019 generator Splitter (1X2) WOKEN 2WAYDIV 12101200003 Oct. 17, 2018 Oct. 16, 2019 Splitter (1X4) WOKEN 4WAYDIV 0120A042011010 Oct. 17, 2018 Oct. 16, 2019 Attenuator woken PE7013-10 10-1 Oct. 18, 2018 Oct. 17, 2019 Attenuator woken PE7013-10 10-2 Oct. 18, 2018 Oct. 17, 2019 Attenuator woken PE7013-20 20-1 Oct. 18, 2018 Oct. 17, 2019 Attenuator woken PE7013-20 20-2 Oct. 18, 2018 Oct. 17, 2019 20dB Attenuator MVE MVE2462-20 16050401 Oct. 18, 2018 Oct. 17, 2019 30dB Attenuator MVE MVE2462-30 16050401 Oct. 18, 2018 Oct. 17, 2019 Marvelous Direction Coupler MVE4514-20 20 Oct. 17, 2018 Oct. 16, 2019 Microwave Measurement ICC DFS V1.3.30 NA NA Software Note: Calibration Interval of instruments listed above is one year. 1.4 Testing Condition Test Item Test Site Ambient Condition Tested By DFS DF01-WS 25°C / 65% Jack Li 1.5 Test Standards According to the specification of EUT, the EUT must comply with following standards and KDB documents. 47 CFR FCC Part 15.407 FCC KDB 905462 D02 UNII DFS Compliance Procedures New Rules v02 FCC KDB 905462 D03 UNII Clients Without Radar Detection New Rules v01r02 FCC KDB 905462 D06 802 11 Channel Plans v02 Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 6 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

1.6 Deviation from Test Standard and Measurement Procedure None 1.7 Measurement Uncertainty ISO/IEC 17025 requires that an estimate of the measurement uncertainties associated with the emissions test results be included in the report. The measurement uncertainties given below are based on a 95% confidence level (based on a coverage factor (k=2) Measurement Uncertainty Parameters Uncertainty Time ±0.1% Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 7 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

2 Technical Requirements for DFS 2.1 Applicability of DFS Requirements 2.1.1 Applicability of DFS Requirements Prior to use of a Channel Operational Mode Requirement Client Without Client With Radar Master Radar Detection Detection Non-Occupancy Period Yes Not required Yes DFS Detection Threshold Yes Not required Yes Channel Availability Check Time Yes Not required Not required U-NII Detection Bandwidth Yes Not required Yes 2.1.2 Applicability of DFS Requirements during Normal Operation Operational Mode Requirement Master or Client With Radar Client Without Radar Detection Detection DFS Detection Threshold Yes Not required Channel Closing Transmission Time Yes Yes Channel Move Time Yes Yes U-NII Detection Bandwidth Yes Not required Operational Mode Additional requirements for devices with multiple bandwidth modes Master or Client With Radar Client Without Radar Detection Detection U-NII Detection Bandwidth and All BW modes must be tested Not required Statistical Performance Check Channel Move Time and Test using widest BW mode Test using the widest BW mode Channel Closing Transmission Time available available for the link All other tests Any single BW mode Not required Note: Frequencies selected for statistical performance check should include several frequencies within the radar detection bandwidth and frequencies near the edge of the radar detection bandwidth. For 802.11 devices it is suggested to select frequencies in all 20 MHz channel blocks and a null frequencies between the bonded 20 MHz channel blocks. Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 8 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

2.2 DFS Detection Thresholds and Response Requirement Below table provides the DFS Detection Thresholds for Master Devices as well as Client Devices incorporating In-Service Monitoring. DFS Detection Thresholds for Master Devices and Client Devices With Radar Detection. Maximum Transmit Power Value (See Notes 1 , 2 and 3) EIRP ≥ 200 milliwatt -64 dBm EIRP < 200 milliwatt and -62 dBm power spectral density < 10 dBm / MHz EIRP < 200 milliwatt and that do not meet -64 dBm the power spectral density requirement Note 1: This is the level at the input of the receiver assuming a 0 dBi receive antenna. Note 2: Throughout these test procedures an additional 1 dB has been added to the amplitude of the test transmission waveforms to account for variations in measurement equipment. This will ensure that the test signal is at or above the detection threshold level to trigger a DFS response. Note3: EIRP is based on the highest antenna gain. For MIMO devices refer to KDB Publication 662911 D01. DFS Response Requirement Values Parameter Value Non-occupancy period Minimum 30 minutes. Channel Availability Check Time 60 seconds. Channel Move Time 10 seconds. (See Note 1.) Channel Closing Transmission Time 200 milliseconds + an aggregate of 60 milliseconds over remaining 10 second period. (See Notes 1 and 2.) U-NII Detection Bandwidth Minimum 100% of the U- NII 99% transmission power bandwidth. (See Note 3.) Note 1: Channel Move Time and the Channel Closing Transmission Time should be performed with Radar Type 0. The measurement timing begins at the end of the Radar Type 0 burst. Note 2: The Channel Closing Transmission Time is comprised of 200 milliseconds starting at the beginning of the Channel Move Time plus any additional intermittent control signals required to facilitate a Channel move (an aggregate of 60 milliseconds) during the remainder of the 10 second period. The aggregate duration of control signals will not count quiet periods in between transmissions. Note 3: During the U-NII Detection Bandwidth detection test, radar type 0 should be used. For each frequency step the minimum percentage of detection is 90 percent. Measurements are performed with no data traffic. Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 9 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

C Infernational Certification Corp. 2.3 Radar Test Waveforms This section provides the parameters for required test waveforms, minimum percentage of successful detections, and the minimum number oftrials that must be used for determining DFS conformance. Step intervals of 0.1 microsecond for Pulse Width, 1 microsecond for PRI, 1 MHz for chirp width and 1 for the number of pulses will be utilized for the random determination of specific test waveforms. 2.3.1 Short Pulse Radar Test Waveforms Minimum Radar Pulse Width PRI (usec) Number of Percentage of Minimum Type (Lusec) M Pulses Successful Number of Trials Detection 0 1 1428 18 See Note1 See Note1 1 Test A: 15 unique L] 60% 30 PRI values 360 randomly Roundup 840° selected from the Pri ][ list of 23 PRI values in Table Sa Test B: 15 unique PRI values randomly selected within the range of 518—3066 usec, with a minimum increment of 1 usec, excluding PRI values selected in Test A 2 1—5 150—230 23—29 60% 30 3 6—10 200—500 16—18 60% 30 4 11—20 200—500 1216 60% 30 Aggregate (Radar Types 1—4) 80% 120 Note 1: Short Pulse Radar Type 0 should be used for the detection bandwidth test, channel move time, and channel closing time tests. A minimum of 30 unique waveforms are required for each of the Short Pulse Radar Types 2 through 4. If more than 30 waveforms are used for Short Pulse Radar Types 2 through 4, then each additional waveform must also be unique and not repeated from the previous waveforms. If more than 30 waveforms are used for Short Pulse Radar Type 1, then each additional waveform is generated with Test B and must also be unique and not repeated from the previous waveforms in Tests A or B. Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 10 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

Pulse Repetition Intervals Values for Test A Pulse Repetition Frequency Pulse Repetition Frequency Pulse Repetition Interval Number (Pulses Per Second) (Microseconds) 1 1930.5 518 2 1858.7 538 3 1792.1 558 4 1730.1 578 5 1672.2 598 6 1618.1 618 7 1567.4 638 8 1519.8 658 9 1474.9 678 10 1432.7 698 11 1392.8 718 12 1355 738 13 1319.3 758 14 1285.3 778 15 1253.1 798 16 1222.5 818 17 1193.3 838 18 1165.6 858 19 1139 878 20 1113.6 898 21 1089.3 918 22 1066.1 938 23 326.2 3066 Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 11 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

2.3.2 Long Pulse Radar Test Waveform Minimum Pulse Number of Percentage Minimum Radar Chirp Width Number of Width PRI (µsec) Pulses per of Number of Type (MHz) Bursts (µsec) Burst Successful Trials Detection 5 50-100 5-20 1000-2000 1-3 8-20 80% 30 The parameters for this waveform are randomly chosen. Thirty unique waveforms are required for the Long Pulse Radar Type waveforms. If more than 30 waveforms are used for the Long Pulse Radar Type waveforms, then each additional waveform must also be unique and not repeated from the previous waveforms. 2.3.3 Frequency Hopping Radar Test Waveform Minimum Hopping Pulse Percentage Minimum Radar Pulses per Hopping Sequence Width PRI (µsec) of Number of Type Hop Rate (kHz) Length (µsec) Successful Trials (msec) Detection 6 1 333 9 0.333 300 70% 30 For the Frequency Hopping Radar Type, the same Burst parameters are used for each waveform. The hopping sequence is different for each waveform and a 100-length segment is selected from the hopping sequence defined by the following algorithm: The first frequency in a hopping sequence is selected randomly from the group of 475 integer frequencies from 5250 – 5724 MHz. Next, the frequency that was just chosen is removed from the group and a frequency is randomly selected from the remaining 474 frequencies in the group. This process continues until all 475 frequencies are chosen for the set. For selection of a random frequency, the frequencies remaining within the group are always treated as equally likely 2.3.4 Radar waveform generation A Signal Generator is used for the DFS signal generation. This instrument is capable of generating all the above waveforms with Pulse Sequencer Software. The R&S Pulse Sequencer Software comes as a stand-alone PC based software with preconfigured project files for DFS. It simplifies the generation of all required waveforms and offers a one box solution Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 12 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

2.3.5 DFS Test Setup 2.3.6 Channel Loading/Data Streaming IP Based (Load Based) - stream the test file from the Master to the Client. The data file must be of a type that is typical for the device (i.e., MPEG-2, MPEG-4, WAV, MP3, MP4, AVI, etc.) and must generally be transmitting in a streaming mode. Minimum channel loading of approximately 17 % VHT80 Channel Loading:25.68% Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 13 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

3 DFS test result 3.1 DFS Detection Threshold levels Master DFS Threshold Level DFS Threshold level: -60.01dBm The Interference Radar Detection Threshold Level is (-64dBm) + ([2.9dBi] ) + {1 dB}= -60.01 dBm. That had been taken into account the master output power range and antenna gain. Without Data Traffic Plot (Noise Plot) Master Data Traffic Plot Client(EUT) Data Traffic Plot Calibration Radar # 0 detection threshold level Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 14 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

3.2 In-Service Monitoring 3.2.1 In-service Monitoring Limit In-service Monitoring Limit Channel Move Time 10 sec Channel Closing Transmission Time 200 ms + an aggregate of 60 ms over remaining 10 sec periods. Non-occupancy period Minimum 30 minutes 3.2.2 Test Procedures Test Method Refer as FCC KDB 905642 D02, clause 7.8.3 verified during In-Service Monitoring; Channel Closing Transmission Time, Channel Move Time. Client Device will associate with the EUT. Observe the transmissions of the EUT at the end of the radar Burst on the Operating Channel for duration greater than 10 seconds. Measure and record the transmissions from the EUT during the observation time (Channel Move Time). Compare the Channel Move Time and Channel Closing Transmission Time limits. Refer as FCC KDB 905642 D02, clause 7.8.3 verified during In-Service Monitoring; Non-Occupancy Period. Client Device will associate with the EUT. Observe the transmissions of the EUT at the end of the radar Burst on the Operating Channel for duration greater than 10 seconds. Measure and record the transmissions from the EUT during the observation time (Non-Occupancy Period). Compare the Non-Occupancy Period limits. Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 15 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

3.2.3 Test Result of Channel Closing Transmission and Channel Move Time Channel Closing Transmission Time Channel Move Time Modulation Freq. Radar Mode (MHz) Type Test Limit Test Limit Test Limit (0-200ms) (0-200ms) (200ms-10s) (200ms-10s) VHT80 5530 0 < 200ms 200ms 7.5ms 60ms 0.485s 10s 8001 sample bin for measurement 3 bin [200ms~10s] 20 sec Timing Plot EUT Signal After 200ms~10s 3 bin for data ending transmit radar burst 200ms Zoom-in 600 msTiming Plot 200ms 3 bin after 200ms-10s Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 16 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

3.2.4 Test Result of Non-Occupancy Non-Occupancy Period Result Modulation Non-Occupancy Period Freq. (MHz) Mode Measured Limit Result VHT80 5530 >30min 30min Complied 2000 sec Timing Plot Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 17 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

3.3 Non-Associated Non-Associated Test Result Modulation Mode Freq. (MHz) Observation time Result VHT80 5530 30 Minutes Complied 2000 sec Timing Plot Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 18 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01

C Infernational Certification Corp. 4 Test laboratory information Established in 2012, ICC provides foremost EMC & RF Testing and advisory consultation services by our skilled engineers and technicians. Our services employ a wide variety of advanced edge test equipment and one of the widest certification extents in the business. International Certification Corp (EMC and Wireless Communication Laboratory), it is our definitive objective is to institute long term, trust—based associations with our clients. The expectation we set up with our clients is based on outstanding service, practical expertise and devotion to a certified value structure. Our passion is to grant our clients with best EMC / RF services by oriented knowledgeable and accommodating staff. Our Test sites are located at Linkou District and Kwei Shan District. Location map can be found on our website http://www.icertifi.com.tw. Linkou Kwei Shan Kwei Shan Site II Tel: 886—2—2601—1640 Tel: 886—3—271—8666 Tel: 886—3—271—8640 No. 30—2, Ding Fwu Tsuen, Lin No. 3—1, Lane 6, Wen San 3rd St., No. 14—1, Lane 19, Wen San 3rd Kou District, New Taipei City, Kwei Shan District, Tao Yuan City St., Kwei Shan District, Tao Yuan Taiwan, R.0.C. 333, Taiwan, R.0.C. City 333, Taiwan, R.O.C.. If you have any suggestion, please feel free to contact us as below information Tel: 886—3—271—8666 Fax: 886—3—318—0155 Email: ICC_Service@icertifi.com.tw ==END= Report No.: FZ950701 Page : 19 of 19 Report Version: Rev. 01


Document Created: 2019-07-22 17:14:53
Document Modified: 2019-07-22 17:14:53
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC