Calibration Data

FCC ID: 2AJGM-DMV1

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_4333172

Page 1 of 25 CALIBRATION DATA PROBE CALIBRATION DATA

tfooge c —— Calibration Laboratory of «> m Schweizerischer Kalibrierdienst Schmid & Partner wA & g Service suisse d‘étalonnage Engineering AG g. Servicio aviezero dtaratura Zeughausstrasse 43, 8004 Zurich, Switzerland Swiss Calibration Service Accredited by the Swiss Accreditation Service (SAS) Accreditation No.: SCS 0108 The Swiss Accreditation Service is one of the signatories to the EA Multilateral Agreement for the recognition of calibration certificates Glossary: TSL tissue simulating liquid NORMx.y,z sensitivity in free space ConvF sensitivity in TSL / NORMx.y,z DCP diode compression point CF crest factor (1/duty_cycle) of the RF signal A, B,C, D modulation dependent linearization parameters Polarization > @p rotation around probe axis Polarization 8 8 rotation around an axis thatis in the plane normal to probe axis (at measurement center), i.e., 8 = 0 is normal to probe axis Connector Angle information used in DASY system to align probe sensor X to the robot coordinate system Calibration is Performed According to the Following Standards: a) IEEE Std 1528—2013, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Determiningthe Peak Spatial—Averaged Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques", June 2013 b) IEC 62209—1, ", "Measurement procedure for the assessment of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) from hand— held and body—mounted devices used next to the ear (frequency range of 300 MHz to 6 GHz)*, July 2016 c) EC 62209—2, "Procedure to determine the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for wireless communication devices used in close proximity to the human body (frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz)®, March 2010 d) KDB 865664, "SAR Measurement Requirements for 100 MHz to 6 GHz" Methods Applied and Interpretation of Parameters: NORMx,y,z: Assessed for E—field polarization 8 = 0 (f < 900 MHz in TEM—cell; f > 1800 MHz: R22 waveguide). NORMx,y,z are only intermediate values, i.e, the uncertainties of NORMx,y,z does not affect the E*—field uncertainty inside TSL (see below ConvF). NORM(Mx,y,z = NORMx.y,z * frequency_response (see Frequency Response Chart). This linearization is implemented in DASY4 software versions later than 4.2. The uncertainty of the frequency responseis included in the stated uncertainty of ConvF. DCPx,y,z: DCP are numerical linearization parameters assessed based on the data of power sweep with CW signal (no uncertainty required). DCP does not depend on frequency nor media. PAR: PAR is the Peak to Average Ratio thatis not calibrated but determined based on the signal characteristics Axy,z; Bxy.z: Cxy,z; Dxy,z; VRxy,z: A, B, C, D are numericallinearization parameters assessed based on the data of power sweep for specific modulation signal. The parameters do not depend on frequency nor media. VR is the maximum calibration range expressed in RMS voltage across the diode. ConvF and Boundary Effect Parameters: Assessed in flat phantom using E—field (or Temperature Transfer Standard for f s 800 MHz) and inside waveguide using analyticalfield distributions based on power measurements for f > 800 MHz. The same setups are used for assessment of the parameters applied for boundary compensation (alpha, depth) of which typical uncertainty values are given. These parameters are used in DASY4 software to improve probe accuracy close to the boundary. The sensitivity in TSL corresponds to NORMx.y,z * ConvF whereby the uncertainty corresponds to that given for ConvF. A frequency dependent ConvF is used in DASY version 4.4 and higher which allows extending the validity from + 50 MHz to + 100 MHz. Spherical isotropy (3D deviation from isotropy): in a field of low gradients realized using a flat phantom exposed by a patch antenna. Sensor Offset: The sensor offset corresponds to the offset of virtual measurement center from the probe tip (on probe axis). No tolerance required. Connector Angle: The angle is assessed using theinformation gained by determining the NORMsx (no uncertainty required). Certificate No: EX3—3953_Jun18 Page 2 of 11

tovegz se sn i EX3DV4 —— SN:3953 June 26, 2018 Probe EX3DV4 SN:3953 Manufactured: August 6, 2013 Repaired: June 5, 2018 Calibrated: June 26, 2018 Calibrated for DASY/EASY Systems (Note: non—compatible with DASY2 system!) Certificate No: EX3—3953_Jun18 Page 3 of 11

EX3DV4— SN:3953 June 26, 2018 DASY/EASY — Parameters of Probe: EX3DV4 — SN:3953 Basic Calibration Parameters Sensor X Sensor Y Sensor Z Une {k=2) Norm (uV/(V/m)*)" 0.51 0.53 0.47 £10.1 % DCP (mV)" 97.9 97.5 98.0 Modulation Calibration Parameters uD Communication System Name A B C D VR Unc® dB dBypV dB mV (k=2) 0 Cw x 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.00 125.6 227% y 0.0 0.0 1.0 127.0 Z 0.0 0.0 1.0 138.9 The reported uncertainty of measurement is stated as the standard uncertainty of measurement multiplied by the coverage factor k=2, which for a normal distribution corresponds to a coverage probability of approximately 95%. * The uncertainties of Norm X,Y,Z do not affect the E—feld uncertainty inside TSL (see Pages 5 and 6). ® Numerical linearization parameter: uncertainty not required. © Uncertainty is determined using the max. deviation from linear response applying rectangular distribution and is expressed for the square of the field value. Certificate No: EX3—3953_Jun18 Page 4 of 11

EX3DV4— SN:3953 June 26, 2018 DASY/EASY — Parameters of Probe: EX3DV4 — SN:3953 Calibration Parameter Determined in Head Tissue Simulating Media Relative Conductivity Depth ° Unc f(MHz)* _Permittivity" (S/m)" ConvFX ConvFY ConvFZ Alpha® _({mm) (k=2) 150 52.3 0.76 13.23 13.23 13.23 0.00 1.00 £13.3% 450 43.5 0.87 11.28 11.28 11.28 0.16 1.30 13.3 % © Frequency validity above 300 MHz of + 100 MHz only applies for DASY v4.4 and higher (see Page 2), else it is restricted to + 50 MHz. The uncertainty is the RSS of the ConvF uncertainty at calibration frequency and the uncertainty for the indicated frequency band. Frequency validity below 300 MHz is + 10, 25, 40, 50 and 70 MHz for ConvF assessments at 30, 64, 128, 150 and 220 MHz respectively. Above 5 GHz frequency validity can be extended to £ 110 MHz. * At frequencies below 3 GHz, the validity of tissue parameters (c and a) can be relaxed to # 10% if liquid compensation formula is applied to measured SAR values. At frequencies above 3 GHz, the validity of tissue parameters (e and a) is restricted to + 5%. The uncertainty is the RSS of the ConvF uncertainty for indicated target tissue parameters. © Alpha/Depth are determined during calibration. SPEAG warrants that the remaining deviation due to the boundary effect after compensation is always less than + 1% for frequencies below 3 GHz and below + 2% for frequencies between 3—6 GHz at any distance larger than half the probe tip diameter from the boundary. Certificate No: EX3—3953_Jun18 Page 5 of 11

EX3DV4— SN:3953 June 26, 2018 DASY/EASY — Parameters of Probe: EX3DV4 — SN:3953 Calibration Parameter Determined in Body Tissue Simulating Media Relative Conductivity Depth ° Unc £(MHz)© Permittivity" (S/im)" ConvFX ConvF¥Y ConvFZ Alpha® _(mm) (k=2) 150 61.9 0.80 12.96 12.96 12.96 0.00 1.00 +13.3% 450 56.7 0.94 11.51 11.51 11.51 0.09 1.30 13.3 % © Frequency validity above 300 MHz of + 100 MHz only applies for DASY v4.4 and higher(see Page 2), else it is restricted to £ 50 MHz. The uncertainty is the RSS of the ConvF uncertainty at calibration frequency and the uncertainty for the indicated frequency band. Frequency validity below 300 MHz is + 10, 25, 40, 50 and 70 MHz for ConvF assessments at 30, 64, 128, 150 and 220 MHz respectively. Above 5 GHz frequency validity can be extended to + 110 MHz. " At frequencies below 3 GHz, the validity of tissue parameters ( and a) can be relaxed to + 10% if liquid compensation formula is applied to measured SAR values. At frequencies above 3 GHz, the validity of tissue parameters (e and a) is restricted to £ 5%. The uncertainty is the RSS of the ConvF uncertainty for indicated target tissue parameters. © Alpha/Depth are determined during calibration. SPEAG warrants that the remaining deviation due to the boundary effect after compensation is always less than + 1% for frequencies below 3 GHz and below + 2% for frequencies between 3—6 GHz at any distance larger than half the probetip diameter from the boundary. Certificate No: EX3—3953_Jun18 Page 6 of 11

EX3DV4— SN:3953 June 26, 2018 Frequency Response of E—Field (TEM—Cell:ifi110 EXX, Waveguide: R22) Frequency response (normalized) trr ‘ g_1_1_L_L ’ Lc _‘7 1 11 | i 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 f [MHz] Uncertainty of Frequency Response of E—field: £ 6.3% (k=2) Certificate No: EX3—3953_Jun18 Page 7 of 11

noog> ~ ~c —— EX3DV4— SN:3953 June 26, 2018 Receiving Pattern (¢), 8 = 0° £=600 MHz,TEM f=1800 MHz,R22 — E. a—Sizz 1350 /T hq *as 125 —"*~% * as / \ A 4 N\ & wa > C b oz, o« og s | t \ / k + / + A 4 C 3 + / & 4 / s *tie> «2t _ .. 2s‘ nslc is ms\, & & & te] Tot 2 To 2 Rol [7] sCQflz |BU;'.HH1 %&%Hz Uncertainty of Axial Isotropy Assessment: £ 0.5% (k=2) Certificate No: EX3—3953_Jun18 Page 8 of 11

EX3DV4— SN:3953 June 26, 2018 Dynamic Range f(SARneaq) (TEM cell , fe,4;= 1900 MHz) 105 10+ Input Signal [uV) 10% 10‘ 10 102 101 10 10‘ 10° 10° SAR [mW/om3] C] not compensated compensated Error [dB] 103 102 101 10° 10 102 103 SAR [mW/om3] [+] not compensated compensated Uncertainty of Linearity Assessment: £ 0.6% (k=2) Certificate No: EX3—3953_Jun18 Page 9 of 11

EX3DV4— SN:3053 June 26, 2018 Conversion Factor Assessment 1= 150 MHz.WGLS Flat Phantom 4.4 1 = 450 MHz,WGLS Flat Phantom 4.4 ss so ® as ® C 10 f A 5 33 §. 30 *, $ 6., . $ §: . $ 20 E000 C m x Mnb W * Te os “"‘““.._4 sof6 UOT CR K sim R OR C# _ & ot T Un is k siim 40A # + k % woltes makites wlfi westuns Deviation from Isotropy in Liquid Error (6, 8), f = 900 MHz —1.0 —0.8 —06 —0.4 —02 00 02 04 06 08 10 Uncertainty of Spherical Isotropy Assessment: £ 2.6% (k=2) Certificate No: EX3—3953_Jun18 Page 10 of 11

Page 11 of 22

Page 12 of 22 DAE CALIBRATION DATA

fi ;Collabomionewim s v CALIBRATION LABORATORY Add: No.51 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China Tel: +86—10—62304633—2512 Fax: +86—10—62304633—2504 E—mail: cttl@chinattl.com Hitpy//www.chinattl.en Glossary: DAE data acquisition electronics Connector angle information used in DASY system to align probe sensor X to the robot coordinate system. Methods Applied and Interpretation of Parameters: e DC Voltage Measurement: Calibration Factor assessed for use in DASY system by comparison with a calibrated instrument traceable to national standards. The figure given corresponds to the full scale range of the voltmeter in the respective range. & Connector angle: The angle of the connector is assessed measuring the angle mechanically by a tool inserted. Uncertainty is not required. e The report provide only calibration results for DAE, it does not contain other performance test results. Certificate No: Z19—60040 Page 2 of 3

Page 14 of 22

Page 15 of 22 DIPOLE CALIBRATION DATA

mvG SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.69.2.17.SATU.A Name Function Date Signature Prepared by : Jérome LUC Product Manager 3/10/2017 fi/ Checked by : Jérome LUC Product Manager 3/10/2017 fi/ Approved by : Kim RUTKOWSKI Quality Manager 3/10/2017 Jum Pucthneth! Customer Name ATTESTATION rmmprhamemer c OF GLOBAL Distribution : COMPLIANCE CO. LTD. Issue Date Modifications A 3/10/2017 Initial release Page: 2/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full or in part, without the written approval ofMVG. The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG.

mvG SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.69.2.17.SATU.A TABLE OF CONTENTS eooio e 4 2 D@ViG@ UNG@P TESt ... en en erenee en en eeereeeren en en en en ereneeene e 4 3 PFOGUCt D@SCTIPHON ..... ... en en en en en ree en en en en en reeene e 4 34 General Information 4 4 Mensuremenit MetMhOO ..mmmmmmmmemmemmmmmmmmemmmennnnmmecmmenmnnermen $ 4.1 Return Loss Requirements 5 4.2 Mechanical Requirements 5 5 MEASUP@MENt UNCETHAMNEY ... ...... .ce en en en en eree en e reer en en neeree en en en n 5 $1 Return Loss 3 52 Dimension Measurement 5 5.3 Validation Measurement 5 6 CalibratiON MEASUP@MENt ReSUIS ... mm en nmn en ennmen en 6 6.1 Return Loss and Impedance In Head Liquid 6 6.2 Return Loss and Impedance In Body Liquid 6 6.3 Mechanical Dimensions 6 7 YValidalion MIGISUFAMIONL . ——mmmommmummmmommmmomemmmmmmommmmmmmmummemrnen 7 71 Head Liquid Measurement 7 7.2 SAR Measurement Result With Head Liquid 8 7.3 Body Liquid Measurement 9 7.4 SAR Measurement Result With Body Liquid 10 $ Histuf EQuIPMENN —mm=mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmemmnmmenmnmnmmmenene 11 Page: 3/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full or in part, without the written approval ofMVG. The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG.

mvG SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.69.2.17.SATU.A 1 INTRODUCTION This document contains a summary of the requirements set forth by the IEEE 1528, FCC KDBs and CEUIEC 62209 standards for reference dipoles used for SAR measurement system validations and the measurements that were performed to verify that the product complies with the fore mentioned standards. 2 DEVICE UNDER TEST Device Under Test Device Type COMOSAR 450 MHz REFERENCE DIPOLE Manufacturer MVG Model $1D450 Serial Number SN 46/11 DIP 0G450—184 Product Condition (new / used) Used A yearly calibration interval is recommended. 3 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 34 GENERAL INFORMATION MVG‘s COMOSAR Validation Dipoles are built in accordance to the IEEE 1528, FCC KDBs and CEUVIEC 62209 standards. The product is designed for use with the COMOSAR test bench only. Figure 1 —MVG COMOSAR Validation Dipole Page: 4/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full or in part, without the written approval ofMVG. The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG.

mvG SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.69.2.17.SATU.A 4 MEASUREMENT METHOD The IEEE 1528, FCC KDBs and CEIIEC 62209 standards provide requirements for reference dipoles used for system validation measurements. The following measurements were performed to verify that the product complies with the fore mentioned standards. 4.1 RETURN LOSS REQUIREMENTS The dipole used for SAR system validation measurements and checks must have a return loss of —20 dB or better. The return loss measurement shall be performed against a liquid filled flat phantom, with the phantom constucted as outlined in the fore mentioned standards. 4.2 MECHANICAL REQUIREMENTS The IEEE Std. 1528 and CEIIEC 62209 standards specify the mechanical components and dimensions of the validation dipoles, with the dimensions frequency and phantom shell thickness dependent. The COMOSAR test bench employs a 2 mm phantom shell thickness therefore the dipoles sold for use with the COMOSAR test bench comply with the requirements set forth for a 2 mm phantom shell thickness. 8 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY All uncertainties listed below represent an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2, traceable to the Internationally Accepted Guides to Measurement Uncertainty. 5.1 RETURN LOSS The following uncertainties apply to the return loss measurement: Frequency band Expanded Uncertainty on Return Loss 400—6000MHz 0.1 dB 5.2 DIMENSION MEASUREMENT The following uncertainties apply to the dimension measurements: Length (mm) Expanded Uncertainty on Length 3 — 300 0.05 mm 5.3 VALIDATION MEASUREMENT The guidelines outlined in the IEEE 1528, FCC KDBs, CENELEC EN50361 and CEV/IEC 62209 standards were followed to generate the measurement uncertainty for validation measurements. Scan Volume Expanded Uncertainty 1z 20.3 % Page: 5/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full or in part, without the written approval ofMVG. The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG.

SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.69.2.17.SATU.A 10 g 20.1 % 6 CALIBRATION MEASUREMENT RESULTS 6.1 RETURN LOSS AND IMPEDANCE IN HEAD LIQUID Frequency, MHz 440 460 520 540 550 Frequency (MHz) Return Loss (dB) Requirement (dB) Impedance 450 —22.34 —20 46.6 92 — 6.6 j02 6.2 RETURN LOSS AND IMPEDANCE IN BODY LIQUID Frequency, MHz 440 460 480 500 520 540 550 Frequency (MHz) Return Loss (dB) Requirement (dB) Impedance 450 —26.76 —20 46.6 0 — 2.7 jQ 6.3 MECHANICAL DIMENSIONS Frequency MHz L mm h mm d mm required measured required measured required measured 300 420.0 #1 %. 250.0 #1 %. 6.35 +1 %. Page: 6/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full or in part, without the written approval ofMVG. The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purpose for which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG.

| nvG SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.69.2.17.SATU.A 450 290.0 £1 %. PASS 166.7 +1 %. PASS 6.35 +1 %. PASS 750 176.0 +1 %. 100.0 +1 %. 6.35 £1 %. 835 161.0 +1 %. 89.8 +1 %. 3.6 +1 %. 900 149.0 +1 %. 83.3 +1 %. 3.6 #1 %. 1450 89.1 +1 %. 51.7 +1 %. 3.6 +1 %. 1500 80.5 £1 %. 50.0 +1 %. 3.6 £1 %. 1640 79.0 +1 %. 45.7 +1 %. 3.6 +1 %. 1750 75.2 +1 %. 42.9 +1 %. 3.6 1 %. 1800 72.0 +1 %. 41.7 +1 %. 3.6 +1 %. 1900 68.0 +1 %. 39.5 +1 %. 3.6 +1 %. 1950 66.3 £1 %. 38.5 £1 %. 3.6 #1%. 2000 64.5 £1%. 37.5 £1 %. 3.6 #1 %. 2100 61.0 41 %. 35.7 £1 %. 3.6 1 %. 2300 55.5 £1%. 32.6 +1 %. 3.6 #1 %. 2450 51.5 +1 %. 30.4 £1 %. 3.6 #1%. 2600 48.5 £1 %. 28.8 £1 %. 3.6 +1 %. 3000 41.5 £1%. 25.0 £1 %. 3.6 #1 %. 3500 37.0£1%. 26.4 £1 %. 3.6 +1 %. 3700 34.741%. 26.4 £1 %. 3.6 +1 %. 7 VALIDATION MEASUREMENT The IEEE Std. 1528, FCC KDBs and CEIMIEC 62209 standards state that the system validation measurements must be performed using a reference dipole meeting the fore mentioned return loss and mechanical dimension requirements. The validation measurement must be performed against a liquid filled flat phantom, with the phantom constructed as outlined in the fore mentioned standards. Per the standards, the dipole shall be positioned below the bottom of the phantom, with the dipole length centered and parallel to the longest dimension of the flat phantom, with the top surface of the dipole at the described distance from the bottom surface of the phantom. 7.1 HEAD LIQUID MEASUREMENT Fre:/ll;ezncv Relative permittivity (€,) Conductivity {0) S/m required measured required measured 300 45.3 45 % 0.87 45 % 450 43.5 45 % PASS 0.87 45 % PASS 750 41.9 £5 % 0.89 45 % 835 41.5 45 % 0.90 45 % 900 41.5 45 % 0.97 45 % 1450 40.5 45 % 1.20 £5 % 1500 40.4 45 % 1,23 45 % 1640 40.2 #5 % 1.31 45 % 1750 40.1 45 % 1.37 45 % Page: 7/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full or in part, without the written approval ofMVG. The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG.

mvg SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.69.2.17.SATU.A 1800 40.0 45 % 1.40 £5 % 1900 40.0 £5 % 1.40 £5 % 1950 40.0 45 % 1.40 £5 % 2000 40.0 £5 % 140 £5 % 2100 39.8 £5 % 1.49 £5 % 2300 39.5 45 % 1.67 £5 % 2450 39.2 45 % 1.80 £5 % 2600 39.0 45 % 1.96 £5 % 3000 38.5 45 % 2.40 £5 % 3500 37.9 45 % 2.91 +5 % 7.2 SAR MEASUREMENT RESULT WITH HEAD LIQUID The IEEE Std. 1528 and CEIIEC 62209 standards state that the system validation measurements should produce the SAR values shown below (for phantom thickness of 2 mm), within the uncertainty for the system validation. All SAR values are normalized to 1 W forward power. In bracket, the measured SAR is given with the used input power. Software OPENSAR V4 Phantom SN 20/09 SAM71 Probe SN18/11 EPG122 Liguid Head Liquid Values: eps‘ : 42.2 sigma : 0.86 Distance between dipole center and liquid 15.0 mm Area scan resolution dx=8mm/dy=8mm Zoon Scan Resolution dx=8mm/dy=8mm/dz=Smm Frequency 450 MHz Input power 20 dBm Liquid Temperature 31 °C Lab Temperature 31 °C Lab Humidity 45 % F’e&‘i"" 1 g SAR (W/ke/w) 10 g SAR (W/ke/w) required measured required measured 300 2.85 1.94 450 4.58 4.74 (0.47) 3.06 3.12 (0.31) 750 8.49 5.55 835 9.56 6.22 900 10.9 6.99 1450 29 16 1500 30.5 16.8 1640 34.2 184 1750 36.4 19.3 1800 38.4 20.1 Page: 8/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full or in part, without the written approval ofMVG. The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG.

SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.69.2.17.SATU.A 1900 39.7 20.5 1950 40.5 20.9 2000 41.1 211 2100 43.6 21.9 2300 48.7 23.3 2450 524 24 2600 55.3 24.6 3000 63.8 25.7 3500 67.1 25 3700 67.4 24.2 s m hoins Eum ] CC SA (Wkal we} oi) & to to m 10 t2 14 18 18 T im T von Z (mn) 7.3 BODY LIQUID MEASUREMENT Fre’cll:'ezncy Relative permittivity (€,) Conductivity {0) S/m required measured required measured 150 61.9 45 % 0.80 £5 % 300 58.2 45 % 0.92 £5 % 450 56.7 £5 % PASS 0.94 £5 % PASS 750 55.5:45.% 0.96 £5 % 835 55.2 45 % 0.97 45 % 900 55.0 45 % 1.05 £5 % 915 55.0 £5 % 1.06 £5 % 1450 54.0 £5 % 1.30 £5 % 1610 53.8 45 % 1.40 £5 % 1800 53.3 45 % 1.52 45 % 1900 53.3 45 % 1.52 £5 % 2000 53.3 15 % 1.52 45 % 2100 53.2 45 % 1.62 £5 % Page: 9/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full or in part, without the written approval ofMVG. The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG.

SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.69.2.17.SATU.A 2300 52.9 45 % 1.81 £5 % 2450 52.7 45 % 1.95 45 % 2600 52.5 45 % 2.16 £5 % 3000 52.0 £5 % 2.73 45 % 3500 51.3 45 % 3.31 15 % 3700 51.0 £5 % 3.55 45 % 5200 49.0 £10 % 5.30 £10 % 5300 48.9 £10 % 5.42 £10 % 5400 48.7 £10 % 5.53 £10 % 5500 48.6 £10 % 5.65 £10 % 5600 48.5 £10 % 5.77 £10 % 5800 48.2 £10 % 6.00 £10 % 7.4 SAR MEASUREMENT RESULT WITH BODY LIQUID Software OPENSAR V4 Phantom SN 20/09 SAM71 Probe SN18/11 EPG122 Liquid Body Liquid Values: eps‘ : 57.6 sigma : 0.95 Distance between dipole center and liquid 15.0 mm Area scan resolution dx=8mm/dy=8mm Zoon Scan Resolution dx=8mm/dy=8mm/dz=Smm Frequency 450 MHz Input power 20 dBm Liquid Temperature 21 °C Lab Temperature 21 °C Lab Humidity 45 % Fre&fz"‘y 1 g SAR (W/kg/w) 10 g SAR (W/ke/w) measured measured 450 4.78 (0.48) 3.19 (0.32) es Futicd moiy —J’"”Wm Tag" ( C ‘ § as | os § , rean m & C wea I ‘ we] bra) T 2 i 6 5 m w ao mmiilins & 10 d2 d4 i6 18 20 22 2 2s 2e BID Xie o vie 2( Page: 10/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full or in part, without the written approval ofMVG. The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG.

mvg SAR REFERENCE DIPOLE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.69.2.17.SATU.A 8 LIST OF EQUIPMENT Equipment Summary Sheet Equipment Manufacturer / Identification No Current Next Calibration Description Model ‘| Calibration Date Date alidated. No cal Validated. No cal SAM Phantom MVG SN—20/09—SAM71 required. required. ; alidated. No cal Validated. No cal COMOSAR Test Bench Version 3 NA required. required. Network Analyzer Rhode&Sohwarz sN100132 o2o016 022019 Calipers Carrera CALIPER—01 01/2017 01/2020 Reference Probe MVG EPG122 SN 18/11 10/2016 10/2017 Multimeter Keithley 2000 1188656 01/2017 01/2020 Signal Generator Agilent E4438C MY49070581 01/2017 01/2020 Amplifier Aethercomm SN 046 Characterized pri_or to |\Characterized pri_or to test. No cal required. |test. No cal required. Power Meter HP E4418A US38261498 01/2017 01/2020 Power Sensor HP ECP—E26A US37181460 01/2017 01/2020 Directional Coupler Narda 4216—20 o1386 Characterized pri_or to |\Characterized pri_or to test. No cal required. |test. No cal required. Temperature and Humidity Sensor Gontrol Company 150798832 10/2015 10/2017 Page: 11/11 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full or in part, without the written approval ofMVG. The information contained herein is to be used onlyfor the purposefor which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole orpart without written approval ofMVG.


Document Created: 2019-06-17 09:24:24
Document Modified: 2019-06-17 09:24:24
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC