14_TPS360 TestRpt JBP

FCC ID: 2AJ2B-TPS360

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_3924407

Page 1 of 23 FCC Test Report Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 FCC ID : 2AJ2B-TPS360 APPLICATION PURPOSE : Original Equipment PRODUCT DESIGNATION : Handheld Fingerprint Terminal BRAND NAME : N/A MODEL NAME : TPS360 CLIENT : Telepower Communication Co., Ltd DATE OF ISSUE : June 25, 2018 STANDARD(S) : FCC Part 15B Rules REPORT VERSION : V1.0 Attestation of Global Compliance (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd CAUTION: This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written permission of the test laboratory and shall not be quoted out of context.

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 2 of 23 Report Revise Record Report Version Revise Time Issued Date Valid Version Notes V1.0 / June 25, 2018 Valid Original Report

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 3 of 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. VERIFICATION OF CONFORMITY.................................................................................................................. 4 2. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................. 5 3. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ................................................................................................................... 6 4. PRODUCT INFORMATION .............................................................................................................................. 7 5. SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................................................. 8 6. TEST FACILITY ................................................................................................................................................ 9 7. TEST ITEMS AND THE RESULTS ................................................................................................................ 10 8. FCCLINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ................................................................................................... 11 8.1. LIMITS OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST .................................................................................. 11 8.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF TEST SETUP....................................................................................................... 11 8.3. PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ....................................................................... 12 8.4. TEST RESULT OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ...................................................................... 13 9. FCC RADIATED EMISSION TEST ................................................................................................................ 15 9.1. EXCEPT FOR CLASS A DIGITAL DEVICES, THE FIELD STRENGTH OF RADIATED EMISSIONS FROM UNINTENTIONAL RADIATORS AT A DISTANCE OF 3 METERS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE FOLLOWING VALUES: ................................................................................................................................... 15 9.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF TEST SETUP....................................................................................................... 16 9.3. PROCEDURE OF RADIATED EMISSION TEST ..................................................................................... 17 9.4. TEST RESULT OF RADIATED EMISSION TEST .................................................................................... 18 APPENDIX A: PHOTOGRAPHS OF TEST SETUP .......................................................................................... 22

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 4 of 23 1. VERIFICATION OF CONFORMITY Applicant Telepower Communication Co., Ltd 5 Bld, Zone A, Hantian Technology Town,No.17 ShenHai RD, Nanhai District Address Foshan, China Manufacturer Telepower Communication Co., Ltd 5 Bld, Zone A, Hantian Technology Town,No.17 ShenHai RD, Nanhai District Address Foshan, China Product Designation Handheld Fingerprint Terminal Brand Name N/A Test Model TPS360 Date of test May. 28, 2018~June 25, 2018 Deviation None Condition of Test Sample Normal Report Template AGCRT-US-IT/AC The above equipment was tested by Attestation of Global Compliance (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. for compliance with the requirements set forth in the FCC Rules and Regulations Part 15, the measurement procedure according to ANSI C63.4:2014. This said equipment in the configuration described in this report shows the maximum emission levels emanating from equipment are within the compliance requirements. The test results of this report relate only to the tested sample identified in this report. Tested By Donjon Huang(Huang June 25, 2018 Dongyang) Reviewed By Bart Xie(Xie Xiaobin) June 25, 2018 Approved By Forrest Lei(Lei Yonggang) June 25, 2018 Authorized Officer

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 5 of 23 2. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION EUT test procedure: 1. Connect EUT and peripheral devices (PC) through USB port. 2. Power on the EUT, use the software to transfer data between EUT and PC. 3. Make sure the EUT operates normally during the test. Test Mode TEST MODE DESCRIPTION NO. TEST MODE DESCRIPTION WORST 1 USB (connection for data transferring) V Note: 1. V means EMI worst mode 2. USB cable is provided by AGC-Lab.

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 6 of 23 3. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY TThe uncertainty is calculated using the methods suggested in the “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in measurement” (GUM) published by CISPR and ANSI. - Uncertainty of Conducted Emission, Uc = ±3.2 dB - Uncertainty of Radiated Emission below 1GHz, Uc = ±3.9 dB - Uncertainty of Radiated Emission above 1GHz, Uc = ±4.8 dB

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 7 of 23 4. PRODUCT INFORMATION Housing Type Plastic and metal Hardware Version MAIN-360D-V2.4 Software Version TPS360_V1.0.0 EUT Input Rating DC3.8V by battery or DC 5V by Micro-USB I/O Port Information ( Applicable Not Applicable) I/O Port of EUT I/O Port Type Q’TY Cable Tested with USB Port 1 1 1.2m, Unshielded DC IN 1 - -

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 8 of 23 5. SUPPORT EQUIPMENT Device Type Manufacturer Model Name Serial No. Data Cable Power Cable PC Apple Inc. -- -- -- 0.8m Unshielded Adapter Apple Inc. -- -- -- 1.25m Unshielded Note: All the above equipment/cables were placed in worse case positions to maximize emission signals during emission test.

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 9 of 23 6. TEST FACILITY Site Attestation of Global Compliance (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd 1-2F., Bldg.2, No.1-4, Chaxi Sanwei Technical Industrial Park, Gushu, Xixiang, Location Bao’an District B112-B113, Bldg.12, Baoan Bldg Materials Center, No.1 of Xixiang Inner Ring Road, Baoan District, Shenzhen 518012 NVLAP LAB CODE 600153-0 Designation Number CN5028 Attestation of Global Compliance(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd is accredited by National Description Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation program, NVLAP Code 600153-0 TEST EQUIPMENT OF CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST Equipment Manufacturer Model S/N Cal. Date Cal. Due TEST RECEIVER R&S ESPI 101206 Jun.20, 2017 Jun.19, 2018 TEST RECEIVER R&S ESPI 101206 Jun.18, 2018 Jun.17, 2019 LISN R&S ESH2-Z5 100086 Aug.21, 2017 Aug.20, 2018 TEST EQUIPMENT OF RADIATED EMISSION TEST Equipment Manufacturer Model S/N Cal. Date Cal. Due TEST RECEIVER R&S ESCI 10096 Jun.20, 2017 Jun.19, 2018 TEST RECEIVER R&S ESCI 10096 Jun.18, 2018 Jun.17, 2019 EXA Signal Aglient N9010A MY53470504 Dec.08, 2017 Dec.07, 2018 Analyzer Horn antenna SCHWARZBECK BBHA 9170 #768 Sep.20, 2017 Sep.19, 2018 preamplifier ChengYi EMC184045SE 980508 Sep.15, 2017 Sep.14, 2018 Double-Ridged ETS LINDGREN 3117 00034609 May.18, 2017 May.17, 2019 Waveguide Horn Broadband SCHWARZBECK BBV 9718 9718-205 Jun.20, 2017 Jun.19, 2018 Preamplifier Broadband SCHWARZBECK BBV 9718 9718-205 Jun.18, 2018 Jun.17, 2019 Preamplifier ANTENNA SCHWARZBECK VULB9168 D69250 Sep.28, 2017 Sep.27, 2018

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 10 of 23 7. TEST ITEMS AND THE RESULTS Test item Test Requirement Test Method Class/Severity Result CONDUCTED FCC Part 15.107 Rules ANSI C63.4:2014 Class B Pass EMISSION RADIATED FCC Part 15.109 Rules ANSI C63.4:2014 Class B Pass EMISSION

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 11 of 23 8. FCCLINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST 8.1. LIMITS OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST Maximum RF Line Voltage Frequency Q.P.( dBuV) Average( dBuV) 150kHz-500kHz 66-56 56-46 500kHz-5MHz 56 46 5MHz-30MHz 60 50 Note: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequency. 2. The limit decreases linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 MHz to 0.50MHz. 8.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF TEST SETUP

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 12 of 23 8.3. PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST (1) The equipment was set up as per the test configuration to simulate typical actual usage per the user’s manual. When the EUT is a tabletop system, a wooden table with a height of 0.8 meters is used and is placed on the ground plane as per ANSI C63.4 (see Test Facility for the dimensions of the ground plane used). When the EUT is a floor-standing equipment, it is placed on the ground plane which has a 3-12 mm non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane. (2) Support equipment, if needed, was placed as per ANSI C63.4. (3) All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical actual usage as per ANSI C63.4. (4) The EUT received DC5V power from PC with receive AC120V/60Hz power from a LISN. (5) The EUT test program was started. Emissions were measured on each current carrying line of the EUT using a spectrum Analyzer / Receiver connected to the LISN powering the EUT. The LISN has two monitoring points: Line 1 (Hot Side) and Line 2 (Neutral Side). Two scans were taken: one with Line 1 connected to Analyzer / Receiver and Line 2 connected to a 50 ohm load; the second scan had Line 1 connected to a 50 ohm load and Line 2 connected to the Analyzer / Receiver. (6) Analyzer / Receiver scanned from 150 kHz to 30MHz for emissions in each of the test modes. (7) During the above scans, the emissions were maximized by cable manipulation. (8) A scan was taken on both power lines, Line 1 and Line 2, recording at least the six highest emissions. (9) Emission frequency and amplitude were recorded into a computer in which correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare reading to the applicable limit. If EUT emission level was less –2dB to the A.V. limit in Peak mode, then the emission signal was re-checked using Q.P and Average detector. The test data of the worst case condition (mode 1) was reported on the Summary Data page.

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 13 of 23 8.4. TEST RESULT OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST-L

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 14 of 23 LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST-N RESULT: PASS

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 15 of 23 9. FCC RADIATED EMISSION TEST 9.1. EXCEPT FOR CLASS A DIGITAL DEVICES, THE FIELD STRENGTH OF RADIATED EMISSIONS FROM UNINTENTIONAL RADIATORS AT A DISTANCE OF 3 METERS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE FOLLOWING VALUES: Frequency Distance Maximum Field Strength Limit (MHz) (m) (dBuV/m/ Q.P.) 30~88 3 40.0 88~216 3 43.5 216~960 3 46.0 Above 960 3 54.0 Note: The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequency. 9.1.1 The following table is the setting of spectrum analyzer and receiver: Spectrum Parameter Setting Start ~Stop Frequency 9KHz~150KHz/RB 200Hz for QP Start ~Stop Frequency 150KHz~30MHz/RB 9KHz for QP Start ~Stop Frequency 30MHz~1000MHz/RB 120KHz for QP 1GHz~26.5GHz Start ~Stop Frequency 1MHz/1MHz for Peak, 1MHz/10Hz for Average Receiver Parameter Setting Start ~Stop Frequency 9KHz~150KHz/RB 200Hz for QP Start ~Stop Frequency 150KHz~30MHz/RB 9KHz for QP Start ~Stop Frequency 30MHz~1000MHz/RB 120KHz for QP

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 16 of 23 9.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF TEST SETUP System Diagram of Connections between EUT and Simulators 1-4m EUT 3m Amplifier 0.8 m Spectrum Analyzer RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP ABOVE 1000MHz

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 17 of 23 9.3. PROCEDURE OF RADIATED EMISSION TEST 1. Configure the EUT according to ANSI C63.4. The EUT was placed on the top of the turntable 0.8 meter above ground. The phase center of the receiving antenna mounted on the top of a height-variable antenna tower was placed 3 meters far away from the turntable. 2. Power on the EUT and all the supporting units. The turntable was rotated by 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. 3. The height of the broadband receiving antenna was varied between one meter and four meters above ground to find the maximum emissions field strength of both horizontal and vertical polarization. 4. For each suspected emissions, the antenna tower was scan (from 1 M to 4 M) and then the turntable was rotated (from 0 degree to 360 degrees) to find the maximum reading. 5. Set the test-receiver system to Peak or CISPR quasi-peak Detect Function with specified bandwidth under Maximum Hold Mode. 6. For emissions above 1GHz, use 1MHz RBW and 3MHz VBW for peak reading. Then 1MHz RBW and 3MHz VBW for average reading in spectrum analyzer. The EUT was placed on the top of the turntable 0.8 meter above ground. The phase center of the receiving antenna mounted on the top of a height-variable antenna tower was placed 3 meters far away from the turntable. 7. When the radiated emissions limits are expressed in terms of the average value of the emissions, and pulsed operation is employed, the measurement field strength shall be determined by averaging over one complete pulse train, including blanking intervals, as long as the pulse train does not exceed 0.1 seconds. As an alternative (provided the transmitter operates for longer than 0.1 seconds) or in cases where the pulse train exceeds 0.1 seconds, the measured field strength shall be determined from the average absolute voltage during a 0.1 second interval during which the field strength is at its maximum values. 8.If the emissions level of the EUT in peak mode was 3 dB lower than the average limit specified, then testing will be stopped and peak values of EUT will be reported, otherwise, the emissions which do not have 3 dB margin will be repeated one by one using the quasi-peak method for below 1GHz. 9. If the emission level of the EUT in peak mode was 10 dB lower than the limit specified, then testing could be stopped and the peak values of the EUT would be reported. Otherwise the emissions that did not have 10 dB margin would be re-tested one by one using peak, quasi-peak or average method as specified and then reported in a data sheet. 10. In case the emission is lower than 30MHz, loop antenna has to be used for measurement and the recorded data should be QP measured by receiver. High - Low scan is not required in this case. 11. The test data of the worst case condition (mode 1) was reported on the Summary Data page.

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 18 of 23 9.4. TEST RESULT OF RADIATED EMISSION TEST RADIATED EMISSION TEST AT 3M DISTANCE-HORIZONTAL RESULT: PASS

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 19 of 23 RADIATED EMISSION TEST AT 3M DISTANCE-VERTICAL RESULT: PASS Note: 1.Measurement = Reading + Factor, Over = Measurement – Limit. 2. The “Factor” value can be calculated automatically by software of measurement system.

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 20 of 23 RADIATED EMISSION ABOVE 1GHZ (1-10TH HARMONICS) –HORIZONTAL

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 21 of 23 RADIATED EMISSION ABOVE 1GHZ (1-10TH HARMONICS) –VERTICAL RESULT: PASS Note: 1. Emissions range from 6GHz to 12.5GHz have 20dB margin. No recording in the test report. 2. Factor=Antenna Factor + Cable loss - Amplifier gain, Margin=Measurement-Limit. 3. The “Factor” value can be calculated automatically by software of measurement system.

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 22 of 23 APPENDIX A: PHOTOGRAPHS OF TEST SETUP FCC LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST SETUP FCC RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP

Report No.: AGC01684180501FE01 Page 23 of 23 FCC RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP ----END OF REPORT----


Document Created: 2018-07-03 14:39:55
Document Modified: 2018-07-03 14:39:55
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC