14_XBS9-1055 TestRpt p2

FCC ID: 2AHAS-XBS9-1055

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_4325442

Report No.: AGCO01806190601FEO3 Page 46 of 61 TEST PLOT OF LOW CHANNEL BW Agilent Spectrum Analyzer — Swept SA Ios—](—62~fnew] RF 502 AC |__sense—tnT) | ALIGN AUTO 06:50:40 PM Jun 10, 2019 Marker 1 A 2.88333 ms Avg Type: Log—Pwr sn Marker. PNO: Fast —» Trig: Free Run IFGain:Low Atten: 30 dB 10 dBidiv _Ref 20.00 dBm [Mee}#] x Y FUNCTION FUNCTION WiDTH FUNCTION VALUE 1ropem 2.883 ms (A mecromr a Fl1ilt! 1.817 ms SCce T e soe ac |__sense—tnT) | ALIGN AUTO 06:54:18 PM Jun 10, 2019 Bm Avg Type: Log—Pwr PNO: Fast —» Trig: Free Run IFGain:Low Atten: 30 dB Attenuation Center 2402000000 GHz Res BW 1.0 MHz #VBW 3.0 MHz Sweep 7.902 s (30000 pts Attestation of Global Compliance(Shenzhen)Co.,Ltd. Add: 2/F., Building 2, No.1—4, Chaxi Sanwei Technial Industrial Park, Gushu, Xixiang, Bao‘an District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China Tel: +86—755 2523 4088 E—mail: agc@ageo—cert.com Service Hotline:400 089 2118

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 47 of 61 TEST PLOT OF MIDDLE CHANNEL

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 48 of 61 TEST PLOT OF HIGH CHANNEL

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 49 of 61 13. FREQUENCY SEPARATION 13.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE The EUT shall have its hopping function enabled. Use the following spectrum analyzer settings: 1. Span: Wide enough to capture the peaks of two adjacent channels. 2. RBW: Start with the RBW set to approximately 30% of the channel spacing; adjust as necessary to best identify the center of each individual channel. 3. Video (or average) bandwidth (VBW) ≥ RBW. 4. Sweep: Auto. e) Detector function: Peak. f) Trace: Max hold. g) Allow the trace to stabilize. Use the marker-delta function to determine the separation between the peaks of the adjacent channels. 13.2. TEST SETUP (BLOCK DIAGRAM OF CONFIGURATION) Same as described in section 6.2 13.3. MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT USED The same as described in section 6.3 13.4. LIMITS AND MEASUREMENT RESULT CHANNEL LIMIT RESULT CHANNEL SEPARATION KHz KHz Pass CH01-CH02 1000 >=25 KHz or 2/3 20 dB BW TEST PLOT FOR FREQUENCY SEPARATION Note: The π /4-DQPSK modulation is the worst case and recorded in the report.

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 50 of 61 14. FCC LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST 14.1. LIMITS OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST Maximum RF Line Voltage Frequency Q.P.( dBuV) Average( dBuV) 150kHz~500kHz 66-56 56-46 500kHz~5MHz 56 46 5MHz~30MHz 60 50 Note: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequency. 2. The limit decreases linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 MHz to 0.50 MHz. 14.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST EUT & Support Units

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 51 of 61 14.3. PRELIMINARY PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST 1. The equipment was set up as per the test configuration to simulate typical actual usage per the user’s manual. When the EUT is a tabletop system, a wooden table with a height of 0.8 meters is used and is placed on the ground plane as per ANSI C63.10 (see Test Facility for the dimensions of the ground plane used). When the EUT is a floor-standing equipment, it is placed on the ground plane which has a 3-12 mm non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane. 2. Support equipment, if needed, was placed as per ANSI C63.10. 3. All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical actual usage as per ANSI C63.10. 4. All support equipments received AC120V/60Hz power from a LISN, if any. 5. The EUT received DC 15V power from adapter which received AC120V/60Hz power from a LISN. 6. The test program was started. Emissions were measured on each current carrying line of the EUT using a spectrum Analyzer / Receiver connected to the LISN powering the EUT. The LISN has two monitoring points: Line 1 (Hot Side) and Line 2 (Neutral Side). Two scans were taken: one with Line 1 connected to Analyzer / Receiver and Line 2 connected to a 50 ohm load; the second scan had Line 1 connected to a 50 ohm load and Line 2 connected to the Analyzer / Receiver. 7. Analyzer / Receiver scanned from 150 kHz to 30MHz for emissions in each of the test modes. 8. During the above scans, the emissions were maximized by cable manipulation. 9. The test mode(s) were scanned during the preliminary test. Then, the EUT configuration and cable configuration of the above highest emission level were recorded for reference of final testing. 14.4. FINAL PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST 1. EUT and support equipment was set up on the test bench as per step 2 of the preliminary test. 2. A scan was taken on both power lines, Line 1 and Line 2, recording at least the six highest emissions. Emission frequency and amplitude were recorded into a computer in which correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare reading to the applicable limit. If EUT emission level was less –2dB to the A.V. limit in Peak mode, then the emission signal was re-checked using Q.P and Average detector. 3. The test data of the worst case condition(s) was reported on the Summary Data page.

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 52 of 61 14.5. TEST RESULT OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST Line Conducted Emission Test Line 1-L

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 53 of 61 Line Conducted Emission Test Line 2-N

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 54 of 61 APPENDIX A: PHOTOGRAPHS OF TEST SETUP RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP BELOW 1GHZ RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP ABOVE 1GHZ

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 55 of 61 CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST SETUP

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 56 of 61 APPENDIX B: PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT TOTAL VIEW OF EUT TOP VIEW OF EUT

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 57 of 61 BOTTOM VIEW OF EUT FRONT VIEW OF EUT

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 58 of 61 BACK VIEW OF EUT LEFT VIEW OF EUT

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 59 of 61 RIGHT VIEW OF EUT OPEN VIEW OF EUT

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 60 of 61 VIEW OF BATTERY INTERNAL VIEW OF EUT-1 Antenna

Report No.: AGC01806190601FE03 Page 61 of 61 INTERNAL VIEW OF EUT-2 INTERNAL VIEW OF EUT-3 ----END OF REPORT----


Document Created: 2019-06-20 12:55:51
Document Modified: 2019-06-20 12:55:51
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC