14_VIXMINI TestRpt JBP

FCC ID: 2AFIW-300NV3

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_4085339

Page 1 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E TEST REPORT FCC PART 15 SUBPART B Test report On Behalf of GL Technologies (HongKong) Limited For 300M Mini Router Model No.: VIXMINI FCC ID: 2AFIW-300NV3 Prepared for : GL Technologies (HongKong) Limited 103B, Enterprice Place 5W, Hong Kong Science Park, Sha Tin, Hong Kong Prepared By : Shenzhen HUAK Testing Technology Co., Ltd. 1F, B2 Building, Junfeng Zhongcheng Zhizao Innovation Park, Fuhai Street, Bao'an District, Shenzhen City, China Date of Test: Oct. 18, 2018 ~ Oct. 26, 2018 Date of Report: Oct. 26, 2018 Report Number: HK1810161292E

Page 2 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E TEST RESULT CERTIFICATION Applicant’s name .................... : GL Technologies (HongKong) Limited 103B, Enterprice Place 5W, Hong Kong Science Park, Sha Tin, Address ..................................... : Hong Kong Manufacture's Name ............... : GL Technologies (HongKong) Limited 103B, Enterprice Place 5W, Hong Kong Science Park, Sha Tin, Address ..................................... : Hong Kong Product description Trade Mark: GL.iNET Product name............................ : 300M Mini Router Model and/or type reference ... : VIXMINI Standards................................. : 47 CFR FCC Part 15 Subpart B 15.107&15.109 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial purposes as long as the Shenzhen HUAK Testing Technology Co., Ltd. is acknowledged as copyright owner and source of the material. Shenzhen HUAK Testing Technology Co., Ltd. takes no responsibility for and will not assume liability for damages resulting from the reader's interpretation of the reproduced material due to its placement and context. Date of Test ................................................: Date (s) of performance of tests .................: Oct. 18, 2018 to Oct. 26, 2018 Date of Issue ...............................................: Oct. 26, 2018 Test Result ...................................................: Pass Testing Engineer : (Gary Qian) Technical Manager : (Eden Hu) Authorized Signatory : (Jason Zhou)

Page 3 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 TEST STANDARDS .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 TEST DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 TEST FACILITY ........................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 STATEMENT OF THE MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY .......................................................................... 5 2.GENERAL INFORMATION................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT ............................................................................................................ 6 2.3. DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES ............................................................................................................. 6 2.4. RELATED SUBMITTAL(S) / GRANT (S) .................................................................................................... 6 2.5. TEST METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................. 6 2.6. ACCESSORIES USED............................................................................................................................... 6 2.7 EQUIPMENT USED .................................................................................................................................... 7 3. RADIATED EMISSION ..................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE ............................................................................................................... 8 3.2. TEST SETUP............................................................................................................................................ 10 3.3. TEST RESULT.......................................................................................................................................... 11 4. FCC LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST .................................................................................................. 13 4.1. LIMITS OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST .................................................................................. 13 4.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ................................................................ 13 4.3. PRELIMINARY PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ............................................. 14 4.4. FINAL PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ............................................................ 14 4.5. TEST RESULT OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ...................................................................... 15 APPENDIX A: PHOTOGRAPHS OF TEST SETUP .......................................................................................... 17 APPENDIX B: PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT ......................................................................................................... 19

Page 4 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E 1.SUMMARY 1.1 TEST STANDARDS This submittal(s) (test report) is intended to comply with Section 15.107&109 of the FCC Part 15, Subpart B Rules. 1.2 TEST DESCRIPTION FCC RULES DESCRIPTION OF TEST RESULT §15.109 Radiated Emission Compliant §15.107 Conducted Emission Compliant 1.3 TEST FACILITY 1.3.1 Address of the test laboratory Shenzhen HUAK Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Add.:1F, B2 Building, Junfeng Zhongcheng Zhizao Innovation Park,Heping Community, Fuhai Street, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, China There is one 3m semi-anechoic chamber and two line conducted labs for final test. The Test Sites meet the requirements in documents ANSI C63.4 and CISPR 32/EN 55032 requirements. 1.3.2 Laboratory accreditation The test facility is recognized, certified, or accredited by the following organizations: IC Registration No.: 21210 The 3m alternate test site of Shenzhen HUAK Testing Technology Co., Ltd. EMC Laboratory has been registered by Certification and Engineer Bureau of Industry Canada for the performance of with Registration No.: 21210 on May 24, 2016. FCC Registration No.: CN1229 Test Firm Registration Number : 616276

Page 5 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E 1.4 STATEMENT OF THE MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY The data and results referenced in this document are true and accurate. The reader is cautioned that there may be errors within the calibration limits of the equipment and facilities. The measurement uncertainty was calculated for all measurements listed in this test report acc. to CISPR 16 - 4 “Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods – Part 4: Uncertainty in EMC Measurements“ and is documented in the Shenzhen HUAK Testing Technology Co., Ltd. quality system acc. to DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025. Furthermore, component and process variability of devices similar to that tested may result in additional deviation. The manufacturer has the sole responsibility of continued compliance of the device. Hereafter the best measurement capability for HUAK laboratory is reported: Measurement Test Notes Uncertainty Radiated Emission 30~1000MHz ±4.10dB (1) Radiated Emission Above 1GHz ±4.32dB (1) Conducted Disturbance0.15~30MHz ±3.20dB (1) (1) This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2.

Page 6 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E 2.GENERAL INFORMATION 2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS During the measurement the environmental conditions were within the listed ranges: Normal Temperature: 25°C Relative Humidity: 55 % Air Pressure: 101 kPa 2.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT Product Name: 300M Mini Router Model/Type reference: VIXMINI Power supply: DC 5V Highest Operation Frequency 2.462GHz Hardware Version: V1.0 Software Version: V3.001 Note: For more details, refer to the user’s manual of the EUT. 2.3. DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES NO. TEST MODE DESCRIPTION 1 Date exchange with PC Note: All the test modes had been tested, the mode 1 was the worst case recorded in the test report. 2.4. RELATED SUBMITTAL(S) / GRANT (S) This submittal(s) (test report) is intended to comply with Section 15.107&109 of the FCC Part 15, Subpart B Rules. 2.5. TEST METHODOLOGY Both conducted and radiated testing was performed according to the procedures in ANSI C63.4 (2014). Radiated testing was performed at an antenna to EUT distance 3 meters. 2.6. ACCESSORIES USED Item Equipment Model No. Specification Remark Ins 1 Dell PC N/A Provided by test lab 14-7460-D1525S 2 PC adapter YH-195-462 DC19.5V/4.62A Provided by test lab 3 Adapter KA25-0501000US DC 5V/1A Market with EUT

Page 7 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E 2.7 EQUIPMENT USED Cal. Item Equipment Manufacturer Model No. Serial No. Last Cal. Interval L.I.S.N. 1. Artificial Mains R&S ENV216 HKE-002 Dec. 28, 2017 1 Year Network 2. Receiver R&S ESCI 7 HKE-010 Dec. 28, 2017 1 Year RF automatic 3. Tonscend JS0806-2 HKE-060 Dec. 28, 2017 1 Year control unit 4. Horn Antenna Schewarzbeck BBHA 9170 HKE-090 Dec. 28, 2017 1 Year 5. Spectrum analyzer Agilent N9020A HKE-048 Dec. 28, 2017 1 Year 6. Preamplifier Schwarzbeck BBV 9743 HKE-006 Dec. 28, 2017 1 Year 7. EMI Test Receiver Rohde & Schwarz ESCI 7 HKE-010 Dec. 28, 2017 1 Year Bilog Broadband 8. Schwarzbeck VULB9163 HKE-012 Dec. 28, 2017 1 Year Antenna FMZB 1519 9. Loop Antenna Schwarzbeck HKE-014 FMZB 1519 Dec.012 28, 2017 May 11, 1 Year 2016 1 Year B 10. Horn Antenna Schewarzbeck 9120D HKE-013 Dec. 28, 2017 1 Year EMC051845 11. Pre-amplifier EMCI HKE-015 Dec. 28, 2017 1 Year SE 12. Pre-amplifier Agilent 83051A HKE-016 Dec. 28, 2017 1 Year EMI Test Software JS1120-B 13. Tonscend HKE-083 Dec. 28, 2017 N/A EZ-EMC Version 14. Shielded room Shiel Hong 4*3*3 HKE-039 Dec. 28, 2017 3 Year The calibration interval was one year

Page 8 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E 3. RADIATED EMISSION 3.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE 1. Configure the EUT according to ANSI C63.4. The EUT was placed on the top of the turntable 0.8 meter above ground. The phase center of the receiving antenna mounted on the top of a height-variable antenna tower was placed 3 meters far away from the turntable. 2. Power on the EUT and all the supporting units. The turntable was rotated by 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. 3. The height of the broadband receiving antenna was varied between one meter and four meters above ground to find the maximum emissions field strength of both horizontal and vertical polarization. 4. For each suspected emissions, the antenna tower was scan (from 1 M to 4 M) and then the turntable was rotated (from 0 degree to 360 degrees) to find the maximum reading. 5. Set the test-receiver system to Peak or CISPR quasi-peak Detect Function with specified bandwidth under Maximum Hold Mode. 6. For emissions below 1GHz, use 120KHz RBW and VBW>=3RBW for QP reading. 7. For emissions above 1GHz, use 1MHz RBW and 3MHz VBW for peak reading. Then 1MHz RBW and 10Hz VBW for average reading in spectrum analyzer. 8. When the radiated emissions limits are expressed in terms of the average value of the emissions, and pulsed operation is employed, the measurement field strength shall be determined by averaging over one complete pulse train, including blanking intervals, as long as the pulse train does not exceed 0.1 seconds. As an alternative (provided the transmitter operates for longer than 0.1 seconds) or in cases where the pulse train exceeds 0.1 seconds, the measured field strength shall be determined from the average absolute voltage during a 0.1 second interval during which the field strength is at its maximum values. 9.If the emissions level of the EUT in peak mode was 3 dB lower than the average limit specified, then testing will be stopped and peak values of EUT will be reported, otherwise, the emissions which do not have 3 dB margin will be repeated one by one using the quasi-peak method for below 1GHz. 10. For testing above 1GHz, the emissions level of the EUT in peak mode was lower than average limit (that means the emissions level in peak mode also complies with the limit in average mode), then testing will be stopped and peak values of EUT will be reported, otherwise, the emissions will be measured in average mode again and reported. 11. Only the worst case is reported.

Page 9 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E The following table is the setting of spectrum analyzer and receiver. Spectrum Parameter Setting Start ~Stop Frequency 30MHz~1000MHz/RBW 120KHz for QP 1GHz~12.5GHz Start ~Stop Frequency 1MHz/3MHz for Peak, 1MHz/10Hz for Average Receiver Parameter Setting Start ~Stop Frequency 30MHz~1000MHz/RBW 120KHz for QP

Page 10 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E 3.2. TEST SETUP RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP 30MHz-1000MHz RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP ABOVE 1000MHz

Page 11 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E 3.3. TEST RESULT RADIATED EMISSION BELOW 1GHZ-Horizontal

Page 12 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E RADIATED EMISSION BELOW 1GHZ-Vertical RESULT: PASS Note: 1. Factor=Antenna Factor + Cable loss - Amplifier gain, Margin=Measurement-Limit. 2. The “Factor” value can be calculated automatically by software of measurement system. 3. Emissions range from 1GHz to 30GHz have 20dB margin. No recording in the test report.

Page 13 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E 4. FCC LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST 4.1. LIMITS OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST Maximum RF Line Voltage Frequency Q.P.( dBuV) Average( dBuV) 150kHz~500kHz 66-56 56-46 500kHz~5MHz 56 46 5MHz~30MHz 60 50 Note: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequency. 2. The limit decreases linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 MHz to 0.50 MHz. 4.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST EUT & Support Units

Page 14 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E 4.3. PRELIMINARY PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST 1. The equipment was set up as per the test configuration to simulate typical actual usage per the user’s manual. When the EUT is a tabletop system, a wooden table with a height of 0.8 meters is used and is placed on the ground plane as per ANSI C63.4 (see Test Facility for the dimensions of the ground plane used). When the EUT is a floor-standing equipment, it is placed on the ground plane which has a 3-12 mm non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane. 2. Support equipment, if needed, was placed as per ANSI C63.4. 3. All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical actual usage as per ANSI C63.4. 4. All support equipments received AC120V/60Hz power from a LISN, if any. 5. The EUT received DC charging voltage by PC which received 120V/60Hzpower by a LISN.. 6. The test program was started. Emissions were measured on each current carrying line of the EUT using a spectrum Analyzer / Receiver connected to the LISN powering the EUT. The LISN has two monitoring points: Line 1 (Hot Side) and Line 2 (Neutral Side). Two scans were taken: one with Line 1 connected to Analyzer / Receiver and Line 2 connected to a 50 ohm load; the second scan had Line 1 connected to a 50 ohm load and Line 2 connected to the Analyzer / Receiver. 7. Analyzer / Receiver scanned from 150 kHz to 30MHz for emissions in each of the test modes. 8. During the above scans, the emissions were maximized by cable manipulation. 9. The test mode(s) were scanned during the preliminary test. Then, the EUT configuration and cable configuration of the above highest emission level were recorded for reference of final testing. 4.4. FINAL PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST 1. EUT and support equipment was set up on the test bench as per step 2 of the preliminary test. 2. A scan was taken on both power lines, Line 1 and Line 2, recording at least the six highest emissions. Emission frequency and amplitude were recorded into a computer in which correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare reading to the applicable limit. If EUT emission level was less –2dB to the A.V. limit in Peak mode, then the emission signal was re-checked using Q.P and Average detector. 3. The test data of the worst case condition(s) was reported on the Summary Data page.

Page 15 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E 4.5. TEST RESULT OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST Line Conducted Emission Test Line 1-L

Page 16 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E Line Conducted Emission Test Line 2-N RESULT: PASS Note: All the test modes had been tested, the mode 1 was the worst case. Only the data of the worst case would be record in this test report.

Page 17 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E APPENDIX A: PHOTOGRAPHS OF TEST SETUP FCC LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST SETUP FCC RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP BELOW 1GHZ

Page 18 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E FCC RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP ABOVE 1GHZ

Page 19 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E APPENDIX B: PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT ALL VIEW OF EUT

> 4 E3 P e Page 20 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E TOP VIEW OF EUT BOTTOM VIEW OF EUT VIXMINL

Page 21 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E FRONT VIEW OF EUT BACK VIEW OF EUT

> 4 E3 P e Page 22 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E LEFT VIEW OF EUT RIGHT VIEW OF EUT

Page 23 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E OPEN VIEW OF EUT 1 OPEN VIEW OF EUT 2

Page 24 of 24 Report No.: HK1810161292E INTERNAL VIEW OF EUT-1 INTERNAL VIEW OF EUT-2 Antenna 0 Antenna 1 ----END OF REPORT---


Document Created: 2018-11-26 10:23:59
Document Modified: 2018-11-26 10:23:59
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC