RFexposure

FCC ID: 2AD8UAEWDAEWE01

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_4445807

RF exposure compliance assessment Massive MIMO Adaptive Antenna Products – AEWD/E FCC ID: 2AD8UAEWDAEWE01 Author Kamil Bechta Owner Christophe Grangeat Organization MN 5G&SC Arch Approver Mohsin Zia Document Type Preliminary test report Document ID LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 https://teams.microsoft.com/_#/files/General?threadId=19:199516ad8ed84ef78ed31c6252c0534d@thread.skype&ctx=channel&context=Products- Document location RF-exposure-assessment%252FAEWD-E Change History Version Status Date Author Owner Reviewed by Reviewed Approver Approval Description of changes date date 1.0 Preliminary 20-08-2019 K. Bechta C. Grangeat C. Grangeat 20-08-2019 Mohsin Zia Initial model calculation 1.1 Preliminary 22-08-2019 K. Bechta C. Grangeat C. Grangeat 20-08-2019 Mohsin Zia 22-08-2019 Document approved and ID added 1.2 Preliminary 29-08-2019 K. Bechta C. Grangeat C. Grangeat 20-08-2019 Mohsin Zia 22-08-2019 Peak EIRP value removed 1.3 Preliminary 06-09-2019 K. Bechta C. Grangeat C. Grangeat 20-08-2019 Mohsin Zia 22-08-2019 Product name modified; Document ID updated This material, including documentation and any related computer programs, is protected by copyright controlled by Nokia. All rights are reserved. Copying, including reproducing, storing, adapting or translating, any or all of this material requires the prior written consent of Nokia. This material also contains confidential information, which may not be disclosed to others without the prior written consent of Nokia. 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 1 / 18

Contents 1 General content .................................................................................................................... 4 2 References............................................................................................................................. 4 Applicable RF exposure standards and regulations ........................................................ 4 Product and assessment method ...................................................................................... 5 3 RF exposure limits ................................................................................................................ 5 4 Description of the equipment under test (EUT) .............................................................. 6 5 RF exposure assessment method...................................................................................... 8 6 RF exposure computation results ...................................................................................... 9 Configuration with Main Unit (AEWD) only ........................................................................ 9 Configuration with Main Unit (AEWD) plus Extension Unit (AEWE) ................................. 12 7 Conclusion and installation recommendations................................................................ 16 List of Tables Table 1 – Applicable RF exposure levels in n260 band expressed in power density.......................... 5 Table 2 – AEWD/E product general technical characteristics ................................................................ 6 Table 3 – Measured AEWD/E antenna gain characteristics for various beam steering directions (from [12]) .................................................................................................................................................... 7 Table 4 – Validation of the antenna model at 38.5 GHz ........................................................................ 8 Table 5 – AEWD RF exposure compliance distances based on the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM (corresponding to 0.64 W per AM rated max transmitted power) .......................................................................................................................................................... 16 Table 6 – AEWD+AEWE RF exposure compliance distances based on the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM (corresponding to 0.64 W per AM rated max transmitted power) .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 Table 7 - AEWD RF exposure compliance distances based on the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM (corresponding to 0.16 W per AM rated max transmitted power) .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 Table 8 – AEWD+AEWE RF exposure compliance distances based on the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM (corresponding to 0.16 W per AM rated max transmitted power).................................................................................................................................... 18 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 2 / 18

List of Figures Figure 1. AEWD/E antenna modules configuration ................................................................................. 7 Figure 2 – Shape of the compliance boundary used for the RF exposure compliance assessment 8 Figure 3 – Top view of AEWD power density for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation = 0° ..................................... 9 Figure 4 – Top view of AEWD power density for the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation = 0° ......................... 9 Figure 5 – Top view of AEWD power density for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = +/-90° & elevation = 0° ........................... 10 Figure 6 – Top view of AEWD power density for the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = +/-90° & elevation = 0° ............... 11 Figure 7 – Side view of AEWD power density for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation = -30° ............................... 11 Figure 8 – Side view of AEWD power density for the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation =-30° .................... 12 Figure 9 – Top view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation = 0° ....................... 12 Figure 10 – Top view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation = 0°. 13 Figure 11 – Top view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = +90° & elevation = 0° .................. 13 Figure 12 – Top view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = +90° & elevation = 0° ...................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 13 – Top view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = -180° & elevation = 0° ................ 14 Figure 14 – Top view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = -180° & elevation = 0° ............................................................................................................................................. 15 Figure 15 – Side view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation=-30° ...................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 16 – Side view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation =-30° ...................................................................................................................................................................... 16 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 3 / 18

1 General content This test report is addressing human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF- EMF) transmitted by the following massive MIMO Adaptive Antenna (MAA) Product (see §2.2): Nokia AirScale MAA 2x2T2R 256AE n260 4W AEWD/E FCC ID: 2AD8UAEWDAEWE01 It provides the RF exposure compliance boundaries for these products regarding both general population and occupational exposure. Outside of these compliance boundaries, human exposure to RF-EMF is below the limits defined by the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Canada Safety Code 6, Australia ARPANSA and European regulations (see §2.1 and 3). 2 References Applicable RF exposure standards and regulations [1] EU 1999/519/EC, “Council Recommendation on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz to 300 GHz)”, July 1999 [2] EU 2013/35/EU, “Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (20th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) and repealing Directive 2004/40/EC”, June 2013 [3] EN 50385:2017, “Product standard to demonstrate the compliance of base station equipment with radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure limits (110 MHz - 100 GHz), when placed on the market”, July 2017 [4] IEC/EN 62232:2017, “Determination of RF field strength, power density and SAR in the vicinity of radiocommunication base stations for the purpose of evaluating human exposure”, September 2017. [5] AS/NZS 2772.2, "Radiofrequency fields Part 2: Principles and methods of measurement and computation-3 kHz to 300 GHz", 2016 [6] ARPANSA “Maximum Exposure Levels to Radiofrequency Fields — 3 kHz to 300 GHz”, Radiation Protection Series Publication No. 3, 2016 [7] Canada Safety Code 6, “Limits of Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Energy in the Frequency Range from 3 kHz to 300 GHz”, June 2015 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 4 / 18

[8] Canada RSS-102, “Radio Frequency (RF) Exposure Compliance of Radiocommunication Apparatus (All Frequency Bands)”, Issue 5, March 2015, [9] US FCC 47CFR 1.1310 “Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits”, August 1997. [10] US FCC OET Bulletin 65, “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields and its supplements”, edition 97-01, August 1997. Product and assessment method [11] Nokia, “Massive MIMO Adaptive Antenna Product Description”. [12] Nokia, “AEWD/E–X31 474612A & 474691A, Antenna Performance Test Report”, 15-08- 2019. [13] Microwave Vision Group (MVG), “EMF Visual User Manual”, SEWB/EMF-VISUAL-UM.1/v2019.1. [14] Z. Altman, B. Begasse, C. Dale, A. Karwowski, J. Wiart, M. Wong and L. Gattoufi, “Efficient models for base station antennas for human exposure assessment”, IEEE Trans. Electromagnetic Compatibility, Nov 2002, vol.44, pp. 588-592. [15] P. Baracca, A. Weber, T. Wild and C. Grangeat, “A Statistical Approach for RF Exposure Compliance Boundary Assessment in Massive MIMO Systems”, WSA 2018, https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.08351. [16] IEC TR62669:2019, “Case studies supporting the implementation of IEC 62232”. 3 RF exposure limits The applicable RF exposure limits are defined by [1] and [2] to in Europe and ICNIRP countries, by [5] in Australia and New Zealand, by [7] in Canada and by [9] in the US and related countries such as Bolivia, Estonia, Mexico and Panama. The applicable power density limits are recalled in Table 1 for the frequency range applicable to the equipment under test. Table 1 – Applicable RF exposure levels in n260 band expressed in power density Region of application General Occupational/Controlled Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Exposures EU/ICNIRP, Australia/NZ, Canada, 10 W/m² 50 W/m² US/related 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 5 / 18

4 Description of the equipment under test (EUT) The main technical characteristics of AEWD/E product are reproduced in Table 2 and Table 4. Table 2 – AEWD/E product general technical characteristics Product name Nokia AirScale MAA 2x2T2R 256AE n260 4W AEWD/E Model number 474612A & 474691A Rated max output power per 0.32 W (25 dBm) per TRx; 0.64 W (28 dBm) total antenna module Number of TXRX 2 * 2TX2RX Beamforming Yes SW supported techno. TDD NR Band / Frequency range 37 – 40 GHz (3GPP Band n260) Nb of antenna elements 8 (horizontal) x 8 (vertical) x 2 (polarizations) x 2 (panels) Gain 23 dBi Horizontal half-power beamwidth 15° (boresight) Vertical half-power beamwidth 9.5° (boresight) Total average EIRP per antenna 51 dBm module Beam steering range per antenna ± 45° (horizontal @ 3dB); ±30° (vertical @ 3dB) module Dimensions Main Unit (AEWD): Height: 364 mm Depth: 169 mm Width: 283 mm w/o handle Technology duty cycle factor 75 % Transmitted power tolerance 1.5 dB Nokia AirScale MAA 2x2T2R 256AE n260 4W AEWD/E can be deployed as Main Unit only (AEWD) with ±90° azimuth coverage or as Main Unit (AEWD) plus Extension Unit (AEWE) with ±180° azimuth coverage. Figure 1 illustrates AEWD/E antenna modules (AM) configuration in horizontal 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 6 / 18

plane. Coordinates system for horizontal plane from Figure 1 is used as reference in the remaining part of the report. Figure 1. AEWD/E antenna modules configuration Table 3 – Measured AEWD/E antenna gain characteristics for various beam steering directions (from [12]) Azimuth Gain (dBi) (at AM1/AM2/AM3/AM4 Elevation Note respectively) 38.5 GHz -45°/+45°/+135°/-135° 0° 23.3 Max boresight gain per AM Max gain measured at -45°/+45°/+135°/-135° +25° 22.7 maximum elevation angle Max gain measured at -90°/0°/+90°/-180° 0° 21.0 maximum azimuth angle In order to provide a conservative assessment on the frequency range, we performed the calculation at 38.5 GHz using the maximum gain over all similar steering directions. The compliance boundary is defined by the half-pipe shape perimeter for Main Unit only (AEWD) and by the full pipe shape perimeter for Main Unit (AEWD) plus Extension Unit (AEWE), as displayed in Figure 2. The distance Rp is the radius of the half-pipe and full pipe, whereas Da,u and Da,d are taken from the nearest point of the antenna. For convenience, the distances Duc and Ddc (respectively) taken from antenna center are also provided. 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 7 / 18

Rp Rp z z Rp Da,u Rp Da,u Rp y y x Da,d Da,d x Figure 2 – Shape of the compliance boundary used for the RF exposure compliance assessment 5 RF exposure assessment method RF exposure assessment is performed using the synthetic model computation method defined in B.4.4.1 of IEC 62232:2017 [4]. Calculations are performed with the “EMF Visual” software release 4.0 (see [13] and [14]). The validation of the model is performed in the configuration with the beam in front of Antenna Module (boresight direction). The validation results are provided in Table 4. Table 4 – Validation of the antenna model at 38.5 GHz Product EMF Visual Model Deviation (from [12]) Gain 23.3 dBi 23.3 dBi 0.0 dB Horizontal half-power beamwidth 12.7° 13.0° 0.3° Vertical half-power beamwidth 10.3° 10.0° 0.3° For each configuration, the directivity pattern is derived from the simulation model and the antenna gain is adjusted to match exactly the measured values for accurate scaling. The RF compliance distances are provided for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and, for information, the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM taking a 95th percentile approach as defined in [4], [15] and [16]. These values include a technology duty cycle factor of 75 % (see Table 2) for time averaging and a power 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 8 / 18

tolerance of 1.5 dB due to electronic component dispersion and operational environmental conditions (temperature). 6 RF exposure computation results The computed power density 2D distributions are displayed in Figure 3 to Figure 16 for RF exposure limits defined in [1], [2] for EU/ICNIRP countries, [5] Australia/NZ, [7] Canada and [9] for US/related countries. Configuration with Main Unit (AEWD) only Grid: 10 cm 10 W/m² 50 W/m² General Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Occupational/Controlled Exposures Figure 3 – Top view of AEWD power density for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation = 0° Grid: 10 cm 10 W/m² 50 W/m² General Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Occupational/Controlled Exposures Figure 4 – Top view of AEWD power density for the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation = 0° 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 9 / 18

Grid: 10 cm 10 W/m² 50 W/m² General Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Occupational/Controlled Exposures Figure 5 – Top view of AEWD power density for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = +/-90° & elevation = 0° 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 10 / 18

Grid: 10 cm 10 W/m² 50 W/m² General Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Occupational/Controlled Exposures Figure 6 – Top view of AEWD power density for the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = +/-90° & elevation = 0° Grid: 10 cm 10 W/m² 50 W/m² General Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Occupational/Controlled Exposures Figure 7 – Side view of AEWD power density for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation = -30° 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 11 / 18

Grid: 10 cm 10 W/m² 50 W/m² General Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Occupational/Controlled Exposures Figure 8 – Side view of AEWD power density for the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation =-30° Configuration with Main Unit (AEWD) plus Extension Unit (AEWE) Grid: 10 cm 10 W/m² 50 W/m² General Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Occupational/Controlled Exposures Figure 9 – Top view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation = 0° 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 12 / 18

Grid: 10 cm 10 W/m² 50 W/m² General Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Occupational/Controlled Exposures Figure 10 – Top view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation = 0° Grid: 10 cm 10 W/m² 50 W/m² General Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Occupational/Controlled Exposures Figure 11 – Top view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = +90° & elevation = 0° 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 13 / 18

Grid: 10 cm 10 W/m² 50 W/m² General Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Occupational/Controlled Exposures Figure 12 – Top view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = +90° & elevation = 0° Grid: 10 cm 10 W/m² 50 W/m² General Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Occupational/Controlled Exposures Figure 13 – Top view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = -180° & elevation = 0° 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 14 / 18

Grid: 10 cm 10 W/m² 50 W/m² General Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Occupational/Controlled Exposures Figure 14 – Top view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = -180° & elevation = 0° Grid: 10 cm 10 W/m² 50 W/m² General Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Occupational/Controlled Exposures Figure 15 – Side view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation=-30° 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 15 / 18

Grid: 10 cm 10 W/m² 50 W/m² General Population/Uncontrolled Exposures Occupational/Controlled Exposures Figure 16 – Side view of AEWD+AEWE power density for the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM and the beams oriented in azimuth = 0° & elevation =-30° 7 Conclusion and installation recommendations The RF exposure compliance distances for the Nokia AirScale MAA 2x2T2R 256AE n260 4W AEWD/E product are summarized in Table 5 and Table 6 for EU/ICNIRP [1][2], Australia/NZ [5], Canada [7] and US/related [9] requirements. Table 5 – AEWD RF exposure compliance distances based on the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM (corresponding to 0.64 W per AM rated max transmitted power) Region of application: General Occupational/Controlled EU/ICNIRP, Australia/NZ, Canada and Population/Uncontrolled Exposures US/related Exposures RF-EMF power density exposure limits 10 W/m² 50 W/m² Radius of the half-pipe (Rp) 1.0 m 0.4 m Distance below and above (Da,d and Da,u) 0.4 m 0.2 m Distance below and above (Ddc and Duc) 0.5 m 0.3 m 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 16 / 18

Table 6 – AEWD+AEWE RF exposure compliance distances based on the time-averaged maximum transmitted power of 0.68 W per AM (corresponding to 0.64 W per AM rated max transmitted power) Region of application: General Occupational/Controlled EU/ICNIRP, Australia/NZ, Canada and Population/Uncontrolled Exposures US/related Exposures RF-EMF power density exposure limits 10 W/m² 50 W/m² Radius of the full pipe (Rp) 1.0 m 0.4 m Distance below and above (Da,d and Da,u) 0.4 m 0.2 m Distance below and above (Ddc and Duc) 0.5 m 0.3 m The RF exposure compliance distances based on the actual maximum transmitted power considering a 95th percentile approach are summarized in Table 7 and Table 8. These values are provided for information about the RF exposure levels that may be reached in operational conditions considering a time-averaging window of 6 minutes according to [4], [15] and [16]. Table 7 - AEWD RF exposure compliance distances based on the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM (corresponding to 0.16 W per AM rated max transmitted power) For information in EU/ICNIRP, Australia/NZ, General Occupational/Controlled Canada [7] and US/related countries based on Population/Uncontrolled Exposures IEC/EN 62232:2017 [4] and IEC TR62669 [16] Exposures RF-EMF power density exposure limits 10 W/m² 50 W/m² Radius of the half-pipe (Rp) 0.5 m 0.3 m Distance below and above (Da,d and Da,u) 0.2 m 0.1 m Distance below and above (Ddc and Duc) 0.3 m 0.2 m 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 17 / 18

Table 8 – AEWD+AEWE RF exposure compliance distances based on the time-averaged actual maximum transmitted power of 0.17 W per AM (corresponding to 0.16 W per AM rated max transmitted power) For information in EU/ICNIRP, Australia/NZ, General Occupational/Controlled Canada [7] and US/related countries based on Population/Uncontrolled Exposures IEC/EN 62232:2017 [4] and IEC TR62669 [16] Exposures RF-EMF power density exposure limits 10 W/m² 50 W/m² Radius of the full pipe (Rp) 0.5 m 0.3 m Distance below and above (Da,d and Da,u) 0.2 m 0.1 m Distance below and above (Ddc and Duc) 0.3 m 0.2 m Installation of Nokia AirScale MAA 2x2T2R 256AE n260 4W AEWD/E product shall be performed in accordance with all applicable manufacturer's recommendations and national laws and regulations related to human exposure to radiofrequency fields. In particular: • The operator or entity putting the equipment into service shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the general population cannot access the area within the general population/uncontrolled compliance boundary in the vicinity of the transmitting antennas (see Table 5 – Table 6). • Depending on the site installation configuration, the operator or the entity putting the equipment into service determines the most suitable place to display the appropriate warning signs and any other necessary information or precautionary measures. • Workers that are required to operate in the close proximity of the transmitting antennas connected to the equipment, for example installation and maintenance personnel, need to be informed about the potential risks of human exposure to RF fields and how to protect against them. They should strictly follow instructions provided by their employer. They should stand-off the occupational/controlled exposure compliance boundary defined in the vicinity of transmitting antennas (see Table 5 – Table 6). If it is necessary to operate within this compliance boundary, workers shall make sure that the transmitters contributing to exposure in this area are all switched off, or they must contact the relevant operator(s) to switch off emissions during operation period. ----- end of the test report --------- 9/6/2019 – LPITPN2I4Q5L-1109616211-627 PUBLIC © Nokia 2019 18 / 18


Document Created: 2019-09-12 15:16:26
Document Modified: 2019-09-12 15:16:26
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC