Test report_15B

FCC ID: 2AAED-R9861500D01

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_2781032

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF FCC 47 CFR PART 15 SUBPART B TEST REPORT for Product Name: ClickShare Button Model Name.: R9861500D01 Test Report Number: T150806L02-EF Issued to: Barco NV President Kennedypark 35, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium Issued by: Compliance Certification Services Inc. Linkuo Laboratory No. 81-1, Lane 210, Bade 2nd Rd., Lujhu Township, Taoyuan County 33841, Taiwan,（ R.O.C.） TEL: 886-3-324-0332 FAX: 886-3-324-5235 E-Mail: service@ccsrf.com Issued Dated: August 9, 2015 Note: This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services Inc. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services Inc. personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document. The client should not use it to claim product endorsement by A2LA,or any government agencies. The test results in the report only apply to the tested sample. Page 1 of 30 Report format Revision 01

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF Revision History Version Report No Date Description Revised By Rev 00 T150806L02-EF August 9, 2015 Initial Issue Wendy.Wei Page 2 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 TEST RESULT CERTIFICATION ................................................................................................4 2 EUT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................5 3 TEST METHODOLOGY ..............................................................................................................6 3.1. DECISION OF FINAL TEST MODE .....................................................................................6 3.2. EUT SYSTEM OPERATION ................................................................................................6 4 SETUP OF EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST .....................................................................................7 4.1. DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS ................................................................................7 4.2. CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST .................................................................7 5 FACILITIES AND ACCREDITATIONS ........................................................................................8 5.1. FACILITIES ..........................................................................................................................8 5.2. ACCREDITATIONS .............................................................................................................8 5.3. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY .......................................................................................9 6 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT .............................................................................10 6.1. LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT ..................................................10 6.2. TEST INSTRUMENTS .......................................................................................................10 6.3. TEST PROCEDURES........................................................................................................11 6.4. TEST SETUP .....................................................................................................................12 6.5. DATA SAMPLE ..................................................................................................................12 6.6. TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................13 7 RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT .................................................................................15 7.1. LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT .......................................................15 7.2. TEST INSTRUMENTS .......................................................................................................16 7.3. TEST PROCEDURES........................................................................................................17 7.4. TEST SETUP .....................................................................................................................18 7.5. DATA SAMPLE ..................................................................................................................19 7.6. TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................20 8 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION ................................................................24 APPENDIX 1 - PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT .........................................................................................27 Page 3 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 1 TEST RESULT CERTIFICATION Product Name: ClickShare Button Model Name: R9861500D01 Brand Name: BARCO Applicant: Barco NV Address: President Kennedypark 35, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium Manufacturer: Barco NV Address: President Kennedypark 35, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium Date of Test: July 23~August 2, 2015 Test Voltage: 120VAC, 60Hz EMISSION Standard Item Result Minimum Requirement Conducted (Main Port) PASS Meets Class B Limit FCC 47 CFR Part 15 B ANSI C63.4-2009 Radiated PASS Meets Class B Limit Note: 1. The statements of test result on the above are decided by the request of test standard only; the measurement uncertainties are not factored into this compliance determination. 2. The information of measurement uncertainty is available upon the customer’s request. Deviation from Applicable Standard None The above equipment has been tested by Compliance Certification Services Inc., and found compliance with the requirements set forth in the technical standards mentioned above. The results of testing in this report apply only to the product/system, which was tested. Other similar equipment will not necessarily produce the same results due to production tolerance and measurement uncertainties. Approved by: Reviewed by: Tankone.Wu Angel.Hu Section Manager Section Manager Page 4 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 2 EUT DESCRIPTION Product Name: ClickShare Button Model Name: R9861500D01 Brand Name: BARCO Applicant: Barco NV Identify Number: T150806L02-EF Received Date: July 20, 2015 EUT Power Rating: From system DC Power Cord Type: Shielded, 0.1m Mode1 Mode2 DDR SAMSUNG / K4T1G164QG-BCE7 MICRON / MT47H64M16NF-25EM I/O PORT: I/O PORT TYPE Q’TY TESTED WITH 1). USB Port 1 1 Page 5 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 3 TEST METHODOLOGY 3.1. DECISION OF FINAL TEST MODE 1. The EUT was tested together with the above additional components, and a configuration, which produced the worst emission levels, was selected and recorded in this report. The following test mode(s) were scanned during the preliminary test: Pre Test Mode Mode1：Normal Operation Conducted Emission Mode2：Normal Operation Emission Mode1：Normal Operation Radiated Emission Mode2：Normal Operation 2. After the preliminary scan, the following test mode was found to produce the final emission level. Final Test Mode Conducted Emission Mode1：Normal Operation Emission Radiated Emission Mode1：Normal Operation Then, the above highest emission mode of the configuration of the EUT and cable was chosen for all final test items. 3.2. EUT SYSTEM OPERATION 1 According to the erection of figure for site erection. 2 Set up the corresponding resolution test, and start testing. 3 Recording the test results. Note: Test program is self-repeating throughout the test. Page 6 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 4 SETUP OF EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST 4.1. DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS The EUT has been tested as an independent unit together with other necessary accessories or support units. The following support units or accessories were used to form a representative test configuration during the tests. No. Equipment Model No. Serial No. Trade Name Data Cable Power Cord NXM8CN0053 Shielded 1 Notebook ZQT Acer Unshielded 1.8m 1708D897600 0.1m 2 Clickshare R9861006BEU 9714092426 BARCO N/A Unshielded 1.8m Note: 1) All the equipment/cables were placed in the worst-case configuration to maximize the emission during the test. 2) Grounding was established in accordance with the manufacturer’s requirements and conditions for the intended use. 4.2. CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST 1. Notebook 2. Clickshare Page 7 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 5 FACILITIES AND ACCREDITATIONS 5.1. FACILITIES All measurement facilities used to collect the measurement data are located at No. 81-1, Lane 210, Bade 2nd Rd., Lujhu Township, Taoyuan County 33841, Taiwan,（ R.O.C.） The sites are constructed in conformance with the requirements of ANSI C63.4 and CISPR 22. All receiving equipment conforms to CISPR 16-1-1, CISPR 16-1-2, CISPR 16-1-3, CISPR 16-1-4, CISPR 16-1-5. 5.2. ACCREDITATIONS Our laboratories are accredited and approved by the following accreditation body according to ISO/IEC 17025. Taiwan TAF USA A2LA The measuring facility of laboratories has been authorized or registered by the following approval agencies. Canada Industry Canada Japan VCCI Taiwan BSMI USA FCC Copies of granted accreditation certificates are available for downloading from our web site, http:///www.ccsrf.com Page 8 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 5.3. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for tests performed on the EUT as specified in CISPR 16-4-2: Measurement Frequency Uncertainty Conducted emissions 0.15MHz~30MHz +/- 2.19 dB Measurement Polarity Frequency Uncertainty 30MHz ~ 200MHz +/- 4.64 dB H Radiated emissions 200MHz ~1000MHz +/- 4.64 dB (below 1GHz) 30MHz ~ 200MHz +/- 4.76 dB V 200MHz ~1000MHz +/- 4.63 dB 1000MHz ~6000MHz +/- 3.91 dB H Radiated emissions 6000MHz ~18000MHz +/- 3.92 dB (above 1GHz) 1000MHz ~6000MHz +/- 3.91dB V 6000MHz ~18000MHz +/- 3.92 dB This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2. Consistent with industry standard (e.g. CISPR 22, Measurement Uncertainty) determining compliance with the limits shall be base on the results of the compliance measurement. Consequently the measure emissions being less than the maximum allowed emission result in this be a compliant test or passing test. The acceptable measurement uncertainty value without requiring revision of the compliance statement is base on conducted and radiated emissions being less than UCISPR which is 3.6dB and 5.2dB respectively. CCS values (called ULab in CISPR 16-4-2) is less than UCISPR as shown in the table above. Therefore, MU need not be considered for compliance. Page 9 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 6 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT 6.1. LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT Class A (dBuV) Class B (dBuV) FREQUENCY (MHz) Quasi-peak Average Quasi-peak Average 0.15 - 0.5 79 66 66 - 56 56 - 46 0.50 - 5.0 73 60 56 46 5.0 - 30.0 73 60 60 50 NOTE: (1) The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. (2) The limit decreases in line with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 to 0.50 MHz. (3) All emanations from a class A/B digital device or system, including any network of conductors and apparatus connected thereto, shall not exceed the level of field strengths specified above. 6.2. TEST INSTRUMENTS CE (Shielding Room) Serial Calibration Name of Equipment Manufacturer Model Number Due EMI TEST RECEIVER R&S ESCI 100781 03/02/2016 V (V-LISN) SCHWARZBECK NNLK 8129 8129-143 08/11/2015 TWO-LINE V-NETWORK R&S ENV216 101604 01/11/2016 Pulse LIMITER R&S ESH3-Z2 100524 01/11/2016 CISPR22 FOUR BALANCED TELECOM FCC FCC-TLISN-T2-02 20625 05/28/2016 PARIS ISN RF CURRENT PROBE FCC F-65A 146 09/11/2015 COUPLING AND TESEQ ISN ST08 31272 10/09/2015 DECOUPLING NETWORK IMPEDANCE STABILIZATION TESEQ ISN T800 34450 03/02/2016 NETWORK NOTE: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. N.C.R = No Calibration Request. Page 10 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 6.3. TEST PROCEDURES Procedure of Preliminary Test z The EUT and support equipment, if needed, were set up as per the test configuration to simulate typical usage per the user’s manual. When the EUT is a tabletop system, a wooden table with a height of 0.8 meters is used and is placed on the ground plane as per ANSI C63.4 (see Test Facility for the dimensions of the ground plane used). When the EUT is a floor standing equipment, it is placed on the ground plane, which has a 15 cm non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane. z All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical actual usage as per ANSI C63.4. z The test equipment EUT installed by AC 120VAC/60Hz main power, through a Line Impedance Stabilization Network (LISN), which was supplied power source and was grounded to the ground plane. z All support equipment power by from a second LISN. z The test program of the EUT was started. Emissions were measured on each current carrying line of the EUT using an EMI Test Receiver connected to the LISN powering the EUT. z The Receiver scanned from 150kHz to 30MHz for emissions in each of the test modes. z During the above scans, the emissions were maximized by cable manipulation. z The test mode(s) described in Item 3.1 were scanned during the preliminary test. z After the preliminary scan, we found the test mode described in Item 3.1 producing the highest emission level. z The worst configuration of EUT and cable of the above highest emission level were recorded for reference of the final test. Procedure of Final Test z EUT and support equipment were set up on the test bench as per the configuration with highest emission level in the preliminary test. z A scan was taken on both power lines, Line 1 and Line 2, recording at least the six highest emissions. Emission frequency and amplitude were recorded into a computer in which correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare reading to the applicable limit. z The test data of the worst-case condition(s) was recorded. Page 11 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 6.4. TEST SETUP Vert. reference plane EMI receiver 40cm EUT 80cm LISN Reference ground plane z For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the Test Configuration. 6.5. DATA SAMPLE QuasiPeak Average Correction QuasiPeak Average QuasiPeak Average QuasiPeak Average Frequency Reading Reading Factor Result Result Limit Limit Margin Margin (dBuV) (dBuV) (dB) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dB) (dB) x.xxxx 35.81 34.89 10.16 45.97 45.05 59.93 49.93 -13.96 -4.88 Correction factor (dB) = cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN+ Insertion loss of transient limiter (The transient limiter included 10 dB attenuation) (QuasiPeak/ Average)Result = (QuasiPeak/ Average)reading + Correction Factor (dB) Calculation Formula (QuasiPeak/ Average)Margin (dB) = (QuasiPeak/ Average)Result (dBuV) –(QuasiPeak/ Average)Limit (dBuV) Page 12 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 6.6. TEST RESULTS Job No.: T150806L02 Date: 2015-8-2 Company: BARCO Time: PM 01:56:52 Standard: FCC Class B Conduction(QP) Temp.(C)/Hum.(%): 25(C)/45% Test item: Conduction test Test By: Wei.Su Line: L1 Test Voltage: AC 120V/60Hz Model: R9861500D01 Description: Mode1 No. Frequency QuasiPeak Average Correction QuasiPeak Average QuasiPeak Average QuasiPeak Average Remark reading reading factor result result limit limit margin margin (MHz) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dB) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dB) (dB) 1* 0.1571 26.00 2.12 19.78 45.78 21.90 65.62 55.62 -19.84 -33.72 Pass 2 0.1981 20.55 -0.45 19.61 40.16 19.16 63.69 53.69 -23.53 -34.53 Pass 3 3.2778 7.93 -1.27 20.09 28.02 18.82 56.00 46.00 -27.98 -27.18 Pass 4 5.0147 4.59 -1.94 20.30 24.89 18.36 60.00 50.00 -35.11 -31.64 Pass 5 8.5141 3.74 -2.26 20.63 24.37 18.37 60.00 50.00 -35.63 -31.63 Pass 6 16.7603 7.97 1.56 20.94 28.91 22.50 60.00 50.00 -31.09 -27.50 Pass Note: 1. L1 = Line One (Live Line) / L2 = Line Two (Neutral Line). Page 13 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF Job No.: T150806L02 Date: 2015-8-2 Company: BARCO Time: PM 02:02:52 Standard: FCC Class B Conduction(QP) Temp.(C)/Hum.(%): 25(C)/45% Test item: Conduction test Test By: Wei.Su Line: L2 Test Voltage: AC 120V/60Hz Model: R9861500D01 Description: Mode1 No. Frequency QuasiPeak Average Correction QuasiPeak Average QuasiPeak Average QuasiPeak Average Remark reading reading factor result result limit limit margin margin (MHz) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dB) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dB) (dB) 1* 0.1581 25.73 1.84 19.72 45.45 21.56 65.56 55.56 -20.11 -34.00 Pass 2 0.2346 16.66 -1.38 19.66 36.32 18.28 62.29 52.29 -25.97 -34.01 Pass 3 2.8010 7.73 -0.26 20.06 27.79 19.80 56.00 46.00 -28.21 -26.20 Pass 4 4.9914 5.00 -2.48 20.30 25.30 17.82 56.00 46.00 -30.70 -28.18 Pass 5 6.6950 2.97 -3.16 20.47 23.44 17.31 60.00 50.00 -36.56 -32.69 Pass 6 16.7440 6.59 0.38 20.82 27.41 21.20 60.00 50.00 -32.59 -28.80 Pass Note: 1. L1 = Line One (Live Line) / L2 = Line Two (Neutral Line). Page 14 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 7 RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT 7.1. LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT Class A Radiated Emission limit at 10m (for digital device) Frequency Field Strength Limit Field Strength Limit (MHZ) (uV/m)Q.P. (dBuV/m)Q.P. 30 - 88 90 39 88 - 216 150 43.5 216 – 960 210 46.4 Above 960 300 49.5 Class B Radiated Emission limit at 3m (for others) Frequency Field Strength Limit Field Strength Limit (MHZ) (uV/m)Q.P. (dBuV/m)Q.P. 30 - 88 100 40 88 - 216 150 43.5 216 – 960 200 46 Above 960 500 54 Above 1GHz(for all device) Frequency Class A (dBuV/m) (At 10m) Class B (dBuV/m) (At 3m) (MHZ) Average Peak Average Peak Above 1000 49.5 69.5 54 74 NOTE: (1) The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. (2) Emission level (dBuV/m) = 20 log Emission level (uV/m). (3) The measurement above 1GHz is at close-in distances 3m,and determine the limit L2 corresponding to the close-in distance d2 by applying the following relation: L2 = L1 (d1/d2), where L1 is the specified limit in microvolts per metre (uV/m) at the distance d1 (10m), L2 is the new limit for distance d2 (3m). So the new Class A limit above 1GHz at 3m is as following table: Frequency Class A (dBuV/m) (At 3m) (MHZ) Average Peak Above 1000 60 80 According to FCC Part 15.33 (b), for an unintentional radiator, including a digital device, the spectrum shall be investigated from the lowest radio frequency signal generated or used in the device, without going below the lowest frequency for which a radiated emission limit is specified, up to the frequency shown in the following table: Page 15 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF Highest frequency generated or used in the Upper frequency of measurement range device or on which the device operates or tunes (MHz) (MHz) Below 1.75 30 1.75-108 1000 108-500 2000 500-1000 5000 th 5 harmonic of the highest frequency or 40GHz, Above 1000 whichever is lower 7.2. TEST INSTRUMENTS Radiated Emission (3M Semi Anechoic Chamber (977)) Name of Equipment Manufacturer Model Serial Number Calibration Due EMI Test Receiver R&S ESCI 101378 01/14/2016 Spectrum Analyzer R&S FSU26 200789 08/11/2015 Amplifier MITEQ AMF-6F-260400-40-8P 1037496 09/17/2015 Broad-Band Horn SCHWARZBECK BBHA 9170 9170-515 03/09/2016 Antenna Specturn Analyzer Agilent E4446A MY44020154 04/08/2016 Pre-Amplfier Miteq JS41-00101800-32-10P 1675713 08/11/2015 Bilog Antenna Sunol JB1 A062604 03/06/2016 Horn-antenna SCHWARZBECK BBHA9120D 267 03/06/2016 NOTE: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2.N.C.R = No Calibration Request. Page 16 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 7.3. TEST PROCEDURES Procedure of Preliminary Test z The equipment was set up as per the test configuration to simulate typical usage per the user’s manual. When the EUT is a tabletop system, a wooden turntable with a height of 0.8 meters is used which is placed on the ground plane. When the EUT is a floor standing equipment, it is placed on the ground plane which has a 15 cm non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane. z Support equipment, if needed, was placed as per ANSI C63.4. z All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical usage as per ANSI C63.4. z The EUT received AC 120VAC/60Hz power source from the outlet socket under the turntable. All support equipment power received from another socket under the turntable. z The antenna was placed at 3 or 10 meter away from the EUT as stated in ANSI C63.4. The antenna connected to the Spectrum Analyzer via a cable and at times a pre-amplifier would be used. z The Analyzer / Receiver quickly scanned from 30MHz to 40GHz. The EUT test program was started. Emissions were scanned and measured rotating the EUT to 360 degrees and positioning the antenna 1 to 4 meters above the ground plane, in both the vertical and the horizontal polarization, to maximize the emission reading level. z The test mode(s) described in Item 3.1 were scanned during the preliminary test: z After the preliminary scan, we found the test mode described in Item 3.1 producing the highest emission level. z The worst configuration of EUT and cable of the above highest emission level were recorded for reference of the final test. Procedure of Final Test z EUT and support equipment were set up on the turntable as per the configuration with highest emission level in the preliminary test. z The Analyzer / Receiver scanned from 30MHz to 40GHz. Emissions were scanned and measured rotating the EUT to 360 degrees, varying cable placement and positioning the antenna 1 or 1 to 4 meters above the ground plane, in both the vertical and the horizontal polarization, to maximize the emission reading level. z Recording at least the six highest emissions. Emission frequency, amplitude, antenna position, polarization and turntable position were recorded into a computer in which correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare reading to the applicable limit. Below 1GHz the Q.P. reading and above 1GHz the Peak and Average reading are presented. z The test data of the worst-case condition(s) was recorded. Page 17 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 7.4. TEST SETUP Below 1 GHz Above 1 GHz z For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the Test Configuration. Page 18 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 7.5. DATA SAMPLE Frequency Reading Correct Result Limit Margin Height Degree Remark (MHz) (dBuV) Factor (dBuV/m) (dBuV/m) (dB) (cm) (°) (dB/m) x.xx 47.01 -14.30 32.71 40.00 -7.29 200 202 peak Freq. = Emission frequency in MHz Reading = Uncorrected Analyzer/Receiver reading Correct Factor = Antenna Factor + Cable Loss - Amplifier Gain Result = Reading + Factor Limit = Limit stated in standard Margin = Reading in reference to limit Height = Height of antenna Degree = Position of turn table Remark = Information of value (Peak/ QuasiPeak/Average) Calculation Formula Margin (dB) = Result (dBuV/m) – Limit (dBuV/m) Page 19 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 7.6. TEST RESULTS Below 1GHz Job No.: T150806L02 Ant.Polar.: Vertical Standard: FCC Class B 3M Radiation Test Distance: 3m Test item: Radiation Test Power: AC 120V/60Hz Temp.(C)/Hum.(%RH): 25(C)/40%RH Date:2015-7-31 Time:9:42:54 Company: BARCO Test By: Will.Xu Model: R9861500D01 Description: Mode1 No. Frequency Reading Correct Result Limit Margin Height Degree Remark (MHz) (dBuV) Factor(dB/m) (dBuV/m) (dBuV/m) (dB) (cm) (deg.) 1 34.8500 14.85 18.40 33.25 40.00 -6.75 100 125 QP 2 239.5200 28.39 12.86 41.25 46.00 -4.75 200 301 QP 3 484.9300 15.82 19.51 35.33 46.00 -10.67 100 253 QP 4 720.6400 17.80 23.22 41.02 46.00 -4.98 100 142 QP 5 832.1900 12.85 24.40 37.25 46.00 -8.75 100 253 QP 6 960.2300 19.67 26.58 46.25 54.00 -7.75 200 33 QP Note: The other emission levels were very low against the limit. Page 20 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF Job No.: T150806L02 Ant.Polar.: Horizontal Standard: FCC Class B 3M Radiation Test Distance: 3m Test item: Radiation Test Power: AC 120V/60Hz Temp.(C)/Hum.(%RH): 25(C)/40%RH Date:2015-7-31 Time:9:35:46 Company: BARCO Test By: Will.Xu Model: R9861500D01 Description: Mode1 No. Frequency Reading Correct Result Limit Margin Height Degree Remark (MHz) (dBuV) Factor(dB/m) (dBuV/m) (dBuV/m) (dB) (cm) (deg.) 1 30.9700 11.88 19.37 31.25 40.00 -8.75 100 26 QP 2 239.5200 28.46 12.86 41.32 46.00 -4.68 200 125 QP 3 480.0800 23.11 19.52 42.63 46.00 -3.37 100 301 QP 4 554.7700 15.44 20.49 35.93 46.00 -10.07 100 253 QP 5 797.2700 15.83 24.49 40.32 46.00 -5.68 400 142 QP 6 960.2300 17.43 26.58 44.01 54.00 -9.99 200 33 QP Note: The other emission levels were very low against the limit. Page 21 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF Above 1GHz Job No.: T150806L02 Ant.Polar.: Vertical Standard: FCC Class B 3M Radiation Test Distance: 3m Test item: Radiation Test Power: AC 120V/60Hz Temp.(C)/Hum.(%RH): 25(C)/40%RH Date:2015-7-31 Time:10:29:40 Company: BARCO Test By: Will.Xu Model: R9861500D01 Description: Mode1 No. Frequency Reading Correct Result Limit Margin Height Degree Remark (MHz) (dBuV) Factor(dB/m) (dBuV/m) (dBuV/m) (dB) (cm) (deg.) 1 6394.231 43.35 7.45 50.80 74.00 -23.20 100 142 peak 2 6394.231 30.38 7.45 37.83 54.00 -16.17 100 142 AVG 3 11298.077 37.59 14.89 52.48 74.00 -21.52 100 301 peak 4 11298.077 26.36 14.89 41.25 54.00 -12.75 100 301 AVG 5 15357.372 35.86 16.45 52.31 74.00 -21.69 100 125 peak 6 15357.372 25.88 16.45 42.33 54.00 -11.67 100 125 AVG Note: The other emission levels were very low against the limit. Page 22 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF Job No.: T150806L02 Ant.Polar.: Horizontal Standard: FCC Class B 3M Radiation Test Distance: 3m Test item: Radiation Test Power: AC 120V/60Hz Temp.(C)/Hum.(%RH): 25(C)/40%RH Date:2015-7-31 Time:10:17:18 Company: BARCO Test By: Will.Xu Model: R9861500D01 Description: Mode1 No. Frequency Reading Correct Result Limit Margin Height Degree Remark (MHz) (dBuV) Factor(dB/m) (dBuV/m) (dBuV/m) (dB) (cm) (deg.) 1 7102.564 42.32 8.94 51.26 74.00 -22.74 100 125 peak 2 7102.564 28.31 8.94 37.25 54.00 -16.75 100 125 AVG 3 10807.692 38.23 13.90 52.13 74.00 -21.87 100 301 peak 4 10807.692 25.43 13.90 39.33 54.00 -14.67 100 301 AVG 5 17209.936 32.99 18.73 51.72 74.00 -22.28 100 142 peak 6 17209.936 22.59 18.73 41.32 54.00 -12.68 100 142 AVG Note: The other emission levels were very low against the limit. Page 23 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF 8 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST Page 24 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.





ooneen en ce en n n m mn n n n + nc n n ce se nc cce —

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Date of Issue: August 9, 2015 Report No.:T150806L02-EF END OF REPORT Page 30 of 30 Report format Revision 01 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.


Document Created: 2015-09-21 17:25:57
Document Modified: 2015-09-21 17:25:57
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC