Experimental Description

0089-EX-PL-2011 Text Documents

University of Wyoming

2011-02-20ELS_113505

December 13, 2010

GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR A RESEARCH STUDY TO EVALUATE GREATER
SAGE-GROUSE AND BENTONITE MINING IN THE BIGHORN BASIN, WYOMING

Jeffrey L. Beck, PhD, Department of Renewable Resources, University of Wyoming

Aaron C Pratt (future PhD student)

Background

Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) were once commonly found across the
>600,000 km2 sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) biome, but currently occupy 56% of their historical
distribution of potential habitat (Schroeder et al. 2004). In addition to large-scale habitat loss,
population declines are also attributed to the loss, degradation, and fragmentation of remaining
sagebrush habitats (Braun 1998, Connelly et al. 2004). Recently, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (2010) concluded that greater sage-grouse are warranted for protection under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, but because threats are moderate in magnitude and do not
occur across their range at an equal intensity, the listing is precluded to other species under
severe threat of extinction. The effects of energy development have been cited as the leading
cause of decline for sage-grouse in the eastern portion of their range, which includes Wyoming
(U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2010). Other factors that may influence sage-grouse
populations include exurbanization, invasion exotic weeds, excessive livestock grazing, wildfire,
and mining. Bentonite deposits in Wyoming make up 70% of the world’s supply and mines in
the Bighorn Basin produced over 50% of Wyoming’s total bentonite production in 2008
(Wyoming Mining Association 2009). Bentonite clay extraction is carried out by open-pit
mining that leads to loss of sagebrush habitat. In addition, mining support activities increase
disturbance activities near mines. To date, most bentonite mining in the Bighorn Basin has
occurred in areas dominated by saltbush desert, but plans call for mining operations to eventually
begin mining in sagebrush habitats, which are occupied by sage-grouse (L. Bucher, American
Colloid Company, personal communication, 2010). These mining activities may prevent or limit
the ability of the sagebrush landscape in the Bighorn Basin to provide the space and resources to
meet the life history requirements of greater sage-grouse.

Objective 1 - Bentonite Clay Mining Effects on Demographic Rates of Greater Sage-Grouse
The first objective of our study is to monitor the effects of bentonite clay mining on sage-grouse
by comparing demographic rates, such as hen survival, nest survival, and brood survival, of sage
grouse in an area actively mined (Greybull) to a reference area (Hyattville) where mining is not
currently taking place. The reference area is scheduled to be mined in the future and collecting
demographic rates for that population will provide baseline information for evaluating impacts or
appropriate mitigations in the future. To accomplish this first objective, we will capture and
monitor 40–50 radio-marked females in each study areas using a combination of VHF and GPS
transmitters. These females and their nests and broods will be monitored with radio telemetry.
Habitat information will also be collected at nest, brood, and random locations to provide


Beck and Pratt                    General Research Objectives                                    2


information that should be useful for restoration of mined locations. We also expect to obtain
data to evaluate avoidance of bentonite infrastructure.

Objective 2 – Migration Patterns of Greater Sage-Grouse in the Eastern Bighorn Basin,
Wyoming

One vital, but often overlooked, aspect of the life history of the greater sage-grouse is migration
behavior and habitat requirements. Consequently, the second objective of our project is to model
the migration patterns of sage-grouse in the eastern Bighorn Basin. This information will
provide baseline information on this population that can be used to help mitigate any potential
negative effects by mining or other land use activities. Reaching this objective will require
capturing and attaching Argos-real time GPS transmitters to 10 grouse in each study area. These
GPS transmitters will provide us with a large number of locations necessary to precisely model
the multiple migration corridors that may be used by grouse from both study areas.

Objective 3 – Greater Sage-Grouse Use of Reclamation Lands after Bentonite Clay Mining

Mine reclamation is an integral component of bentonite mining; however little is known about
sage-grouse use of reclaimed sites. The third objective of our study is to monitor the use of these
reclaimed lands by sage grouse. We will obtain data to answer this objective through assessing
location data provided by grouse with GPS transmitters at the Greybull study area and compare
use patterns to a stratification of reclaimed sits. Stratification may be based on age since
treatment, soil type, seed mix, etc. GPS transmitters will allow us to gather the quantity of
precise locations needed. Occupancy modeling techniques also may be utilized to evaluate the
use of reclamation areas.

Literature Cited

Braun, C.E. 1998. Sage grouse declines in western North America: what are the problems?
        Proceedings of the Western Association of State Fish and Wildlife Agencies 78:139–156.
Connelly, J. W., S. T. Knick, M. A. Schroeder, and S. J. Stiver. 2004. Conservation assessment
        of greater sage-grouse and sagebrush habitats. Western Association of Fish and Wildlife
        Agencies, Cheyenne,Wyoming, USA.
Schroeder, M. A., C. A. Aldridge, A. D. Apa, J. R. Bohne, C. E. Braun, S. D. Bunnell, J.
        W. Connelly, P. A. Deibert, S. C. Gardner, M. A. Hilliard, G. D. Kobriger, S. M.
        McAdam, C. W. McCarthy, J. J. McCarthy, D. L. Mitchell, E.V. Rickerson, and S. J.
        Stiver. 2004. Distribution of sage-grouse in North America. Condor 106:363–376.
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-
        month findings for petitions to list the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus)
        as threatened or endangered. Federal Register 75:13909–14014.
Wyoming Mining Association. 2009. Wyoming Bentonite homepage. < http://www.wma-
        minelife.com/bent/bentmine/bentmine.htm> Accessed 21 July 2010.


Budget for Bentonite Mining and Greater Sage-Grouse Study, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, 2011-2015.


Item                                                Qty Cost         2011       2012      2013    2014    2015   Total

Grouse capture and radio-transmitters                                                                              0

 Grouse capturing and spotlighting equipment                          500       250        250     --      --    1,000

 Satellite GPS transmitters ( @ $4,150)              20 $   3,950    79,000      --         --    -8300    --    70,700

UHF/VHF Reciever                                                     2,100                                       2,100

UHF Antenna                                                           200                                         200

 ARGOS satellite system                              20 $   1,600    32,000    32,000    32,000    --      --    96,000

 VHF transmitters (@ $200)                           70 $      200   14,000               4,000    --      --    18,000

VHF Recievers (4@ $700)                                              2,100                                       2,100

VHF antennas (4 @ $120)                                               480                                         480

VHF 5 element antenna (1 @ $160)                                      160                                         160

VHF rooftop antennas (3@$75)                                          225                                         225

Aerial locations (2 flights/year@$1000)               2$    1,000    2,000     2,000      2,000                  6,000

 Purchase 2 new ATVs                                                 16,000      --         --     --      --    16,000

Purchase 1 new mule/ranger/razor type ATV                            12,500      --         --     --      --    12,500

Purchase 1 new off-road vehicle trailer                              2,500       --         --     --      --    2,500


                                            Beck and Pratt                   General Research Objectives                            4

Workstation computer for spatial analyses                                  5,000      --        --         --      --      5,000




Subtotal, no indirect costs                                               168,765   34,250    38,250   -8,300      0      232,965



Equipment and field supplies                                                                                                 0

 Binoculars                                                                1,200      --        --         --      --      1,200

GPS units                                                                  1,200      --        --         --      --      1,200

 Repairs                                                                    500      500       500         500     --      2,000

Sampling equipment/supplies                                                 500      250        --         --      --       750

Student expenses                                                                                                             0

 Page charges                                                               --        --        --         --    3,000     3,000

 Statistical modeling workshops, lodging, and per diem                      --        --        --         --    1,000     1,000

 Stipend, tuition, and fees                                               22,000    35,811    36,000   39,000    40,000   172,811

 Travel expenses                                                            500      500       500         500   1,000     3,000

Technicians                                                                                                                  0

Technicians (2 @ $13/hr for 5 mo)                            2 $ 10,400   20,800    20,800    20,800       --      --     62,400

Technician FICA, workmen’s comp, and Medicare (@9.0%)        2$    936     1,872     1,872     1,872                       5,616

 Lead technician (1 hired by UW for $15/hr for 5 months)     1 $ 12,000   12,000    12,000    12,000       --      --     36,000


                                             Beck and Pratt                     General Research Objectives                                   5

 Lead technician FICA, workmen’s comp, and SS(@9.0%)          1$   1,080      1,080        1,080        1,080       --       --      3,240

 Technician housing (3 units for 6 months)                    3 $ 11,250 $     11,250 $     11,250 $     11,250     --       --     33,750

Transportation

 Off-road vehicle safety equipment, bags, accessories                          500         300          200         --       --      1,000

Rent 4x4 pickups (2 @($900/mo.) X 5 months                    2$   4,950      9,900       10,197       10,503       --       --     30,600

 Vehicle usage (i.e., fuel and repairs @ 60¢/mile)                           12,000       13,000       14,000      500      500     40,000

Administrative

 Faculty summer salary (plus 46% benefits)                                    5,183       10,365       11,712     12,063     --     39,323

 Travel expenses                                                               500         500          500        500      500      2,500




Subtotal, applicable indirect costs                                          100,985   118,425      120,917 53,063         46,000   439,390



University of Wyoming indirect costs (@20%)                                  20,197       23,685       24,183     10,613   9,200    87,878




Grand Total                                                                  289,947      176,360      183,350    55,376   55,200   760,233



Document Created: 2011-02-20 17:47:40
Document Modified: 2011-02-20 17:47:40

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC