University of North Texas

0382-EX-ST-2017

Status: Denied/Dismissed


2017-04-17

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
Incoming generated [Apr 18 2017]Correspondence2017-04-18
Dismissal Without Prejudice generated [Apr 17 2017]Correspondence2017-04-17
Dismiss E-mail Notification generated [Apr 18 2017]Correspondence2017-04-18
Fee Exemption StatementText Documents2017-03-27
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  University of North Texas

Address
Attention: Kamesh Namuduri, Electrical Engineering, Room B270
Street Address: 3940 N. Elm Street
P.O. Box:
City: Denton
State: TX
Zip Code: 76207
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Namuduri
First Name: Kamesh
Title: Associate Professor, Electrical Engineering
Phone Number: 940-369-8960

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
The University of North Texas, a public university in the state of Texas formed an action cluster in collaboration with several other private, public, volunteer, and Government agencies including Civil Air Patrol, City of Denton, with a purpose to develop an innovative solution for enabling communications and information sharing during emergencies and disaster recovery times. The action cluster designed and developed a “Deployable Base station” which it plans to test during this experiment.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  The demonstration is intended to showcase the capabilities and limitations of the deployable communication system in providing connectivity to First responders and Citizens immediately after a natural or man-made disaster,

Information
Callsign:
Class of Station: MO
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 05/01/2017
Operation End Date: 05/31/2017

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Virtual Network Communications eNodeB 1 Yes
Virtual Network Communications EPC 1 Yes

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Kamesh Namuduri
Title of Applicant (if any): Associate Professor
Date: 2017-03-27 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Port Mansfield Texas North  26  33  36 West  97  26  21 FAA test facility 2.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz MO 5.000000 W 125.000000 mW P 1.00000000 % 10M0A1A Voice/Data
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz MO 5.000000 W 125.000000 mW P 1.00000000 % 10M0A1A Voice/Data
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Sinton Texas North  28  2  21 West  97  32  32 FAA Test Center 2.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz MO 5.000000 W 125.000000 mW P 1.00000000 % 10M0A1A Voice/Data
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz MO 5.000000 W 125.000000 mW P 1.00000000 % 10M0A1A Voice/Data
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Waxahachie Texas North  32  18  9 West  96  58  32 FAA Test Facility 2.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz MO 5.000000 W 125.000000 mW P 1.00000000 % 10M0A1A Voice/Data
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz MO 5.000000 W 125.000000 mW P 1.00000000 % 10M0A1A Voice/Data

29353
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC