Exhibits 1 - 5

0200-EX-PL-1999 Text Documents

The Mitre Corporation

1999-07-27ELS_11851

EXHIBIT 1 Antenna #1 & #2 #1 — 4.6 Meter Andrews #2 — 2.4 Meter Prodolin Cemusney istate « «emmer ang or MM2) ‘A) 4G. All Bandwidths calculated as follows: By = (data rate) x (filter spreading) Ln (# of phases) x FEC rate Example: Data Rate = 2.4 Kbps FEC Rate = 7/8 Filter Spreading = 1.2 t Phases = 2 Ln = National Log (2.4) (1.2) e Ln (2) x .875 3.29 kHz

EXHIBIT 2 RADIATION HAZARD STUDY

ANALYSIS OF NON—IONIZING RADIATION 4. H ATION This report analyzes the non—ionizing radiation levels for a 4.6 meter earth station. The Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin, No. 65, Edition 97—01, specifies that there are two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependent on the situation in which exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to the exposure. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit for persons in a Uncontrolled/Public environment to non—ionizing radiation over a thirty minute period is a power density equal to 1 mW/cm**2 (one milliwatts per centimeter squared). The Maximum —Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit for persons in a Controlled/Occupational environment to non—ionizing radiation over a six minute period is a power densgsity equal to 5 mW/cm**2 (five milliwatts per centimeter squared). It is the purpose of this report to determine the power flux densities of the earth station in the far field, near field, transition region, between the subreflector and main reflector surface, at the main reflector surface, and between the antenna edge and the ground. The following parameters were used to calculate the various power flux densities for this earth station: Antenna Diameter, (D) = 4.6 meters Antenna surface area, (Sa) pi (D**2) / 4 16 .62 m**2 Subreflector Diameter, (Ds) 61 .0 cm Area of Subreflector, (As) pi (Ds**2)/ 4 2922.47 cm**2 Wavelength at 14.2500 GHz, (lambda) = 0.021 meters Transmit Power at Flange, (P) = 224.00 Watts Antenna Gain, (Ges) . Antenna Gain at = 3.162E+05 14.2500 GHz = 55.0 GBi Converted to a Power Ratio Given By: AntiLog (55.0 / 10) pi,. (pi) = 3.1415927 Antenna aperture efficiency, (n) = 0.55 1. Far Field Calculations The distance to the beginning of the far field region can be found by the following equation: (1) Distance to the Far Field Region, (Rf) = 0.60(D**2) / lambda = 603.1 m (1) Federal Communications Commission, Office of Engineering & Technology, Bulletin No. 65, pp. 17 & 18.

The maximum main beam power density in the far field can be calculated as follows: (1) On—Axis Power Density in the Far Field, (Wf) = _(GES) (P) 4 (pi) (Rf**2) = 15.50 W/m**2 = 1.55 mW/oem**2 2. Near Field Calculation Power flux density is consgsidered to be at a maximum value throughout the entire length of the defined region. The region is contained within a cylindrical volume having the same diameter as the antenna. Past the extent of the near field region the power density decreases with distance from the transmitting antenna. The distance to the end of the near field can be determined by the following equation: (1) Extent of near field, (Rn) = D**2 / 4 (lambda) = 251.27 m The maximum power density in the near field is determined by: (1) Near field Power Density, (Wn) 16.0(n)P mW/em**2 pi (D**2) 29.65 W/m**2 2.97 mW/com**2 I 3. Transgsition Region Calculations The transition region is located between the near and far field regions. As stated above, the power density begins to decrease with distance in the transition region. While the power density decreases inversely with distance in the transition region, the power density decreases inversely with the square of the distance in the far field region. The maximum power Gdensity in the transition region will not exceed that calculated for the near field region. The power density in the near field region, as shown above, will not exceed 2.97 mW/om**2. (1) IBID

4. Region Between Main Reflector and Subreflector Transmissions from the feed horn are directed toward the subreflector surface, and are reflected back toward the main reflector. The energy between the subreflector and reflector surfaces can be calculated by determining the power density at the subreflector surface. This can be accomplished as follows: Power Density at Subreflector, (Ws) = 2(P) / As == 153.30 mW/em**2 5. Main Reflector Region The power densitfi in the main reflector region is determined in the same manner as the power density at the subreflector, above, but the area is now the area of the main reflector aperture: Power Density at Main Reflector Surface, (Wm) (2(P) / Sa) 26.96 W/m**2 = 2.70 mW/oem**2 6. Region between Main Reflector and Ground Assuming uniform illumination of the reflector surface, the power density between the antenna and ground can be calculated as follows: Power density between Reflector and Ground, (Wg) = (P / Sa) = 1.35 mW/cm**2

Table 1 Summary of Expected Radiation Levels Based on (5 mW/cm**2) MPE for Controlled Environment Calculated Maximum Region Radiation Level (mW/cm**2) Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field, (Rf)= 603.1 m 1.55 SATISFIES ANSI 2. Near Field, (Rn)= 251.27 m 2 .97 SATISFIES ANSI 3. Trangition Region, (Rt) 2 .97 SATISFIES ANSI Rn < Rt < Rf 4. Between Main Reflector 153 .30 POTENTIAL HAZARD and subreflector 5. Reflector Surface 2 .70 SATISFIES ANSI 6. Between Antenna 1 .35 SATISFIES ANSI and Ground It is the applicants responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not exposed to harmful levels of radiation.

Table 2 Summary of Expected Radiation Levels Based on (1 mW/cecm**2) MPE for Uncontrolled Environment Calculated Maximum Region Radiation Level (mW/cm**2) Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field, (Rf)= 603.1 m 1 .55 POTENTIAL HAZARD 2. Near Field, (Rn)= 251.27 m 2 .97 POTENTIAL HAZARD 3. Transition Region, (Rt) 2 .97 POTENTIAL HAZARD Rn < Rt < Rf 4. Between Main Reflector 153 .30 POTENTIAL HAZARD and subreflector 5. Reflector Surface 2 .70 POTENTIAL HAZARD 6. Between Antenna 1 .35 POTENTIAL HAZARD and Ground It is the applicants responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not exposed to harmful levels of radiation.

7. Conclusions Based on the above analysis, it is concluded that harmful levels of radiation will exist in all of the regions noted for the uncontrolled environment (Table 2) . The earth station is to be located on the roof of a building and access to the roof will be restricted to operations personnel. Therefore, public access to the regions noted in Table 2 will be restricted during operations to ensure public safety. Further, occupational exposure will be limited, and the transmitter will be turned off during maintenance so that the MPE standard of 5.0 mw/cm**2 will be complied with for those regions in close proximity to the reflector, and normally occupied by operating personnel.

EXHIBIT 3 RADIATION HAZARD REPORT

ANALYSIS OF NON—IONIZING RADIATION FOR _A 2.4 METER EARTH STATION This report analyzes the non—ionizing radiation levels for a 2.4 meter earth station. The Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin, No. 65, Edition 97—01, specifies that there are two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependent on the situation in which exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to the exposure. The —Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit for persons in a Uncontrolled/Public environment to non—ionizing radiation over a thirty minute period is a power density equal to 1 mW/cm**2 (one milliwatts per centimeter squared) . The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit for persons in a Controlled/Occupational environment to non—ionizing radiation over a six minute period is a power densgsity equal to 5 mW/cm**2 (five milliwatts per centimeter squared). It is the purpose of this report to determine the power flux densities of the earth station in the far field, near field, transition region, between the subreflector and main reflector surface, at the main reflector surface, and between the antenna edge and the ground. The following parameters were used to calculate the various power flux densities for this earth station: Antenna Diameter, (D) =—— 2.4 meters Antenna surface area, (Sa) = pi (D**2) / 4 .52 m**2 > II Feed Flange Diameter, (Df) 19 .0 Cm Area of Feed Flange, (Fa) pi (Df**2)/ 4 283 .53 cm**2 It II Wavelength at 14.2500 GHz, (lambda) = 0.021 meters Transmit Power at Flange, (P) = 2.00 Watts Antenna Gain, (Ges) Antenna Gain at = 5.754E+04 14.2500 GHz = 47.6 dBi Converted to a Power Ratio Given By: AntiLog (47.6 / 10) pi, (pi) = 3.1415927 Antenna aperture efficiency, (n) = 0.55 1. Far Field Calculations The distance to the beginning of the far field region can be found by the following equation: (1) Distance to the Far Field Region, (Rf) 0.60(D**2) / lambda 164.2 m (1) Federal Communications Commission, Office of Engineering & Technology, Bulletin No. 65, pp. 17 & 18.

The maximum main beam power density in the far field can be calculated as follows: (1) On—Axis Power Density in the Far Field, (Wf) = (GES) (P) (RfE**2) 0 .34 W/m**2 0 .03 mW/cem**2 2. Near Field Calculation Power flux density is considered to be at a maximum value throughout the entire length of the defined region. The region is contained within a cylindrical volume having the same diameter as the antenna. Past the extent of the near field region the power density decreases with distance from the transmitting antenna. The distance to the end of the near field can be determined by the following equation: (1) Extent of near field, (Rn) = D**2 / 4 (lambda) = 68 .40 m The maximum power density in the near field is determined by: (1) Near field Power Density, (Wn) 16.0(n)P mW/om**2 II pi (D**2) 0 .97 W/m**2 0 .10 mW/cm**2 3. Transition Region Calculations The transition region is located between the near and far field regions. As stated above, the power density begins to decrease with distance in the transition region. While the power density decreasges inversely with distance in the transition region, the power density decreasges inversely with the square of the distance in the far field region. The maximum power density in the transition region will not exceed that calculated for the near field region. The power density in the near field region, as shown above, will not exceed 0.10 mW/cm**2.

4. Region Between Feed Flange and Reflector Transmissions from the feed horn are directed toward the reflector surface, and are confined within a conical shape defined by the feed. The energy between the feed and reflector surface can be calculated by determining the power density at the feed flange. This can be accomplished as follows: Power Density at Feed Flange, (Wf) 4 (P) / Fa 28 .22 mW/cm**2 5. Main Reflector Region The power density in the main reflector region is determined in the same manner as the power density at the feed flange, above, but the area is now the area of the reflector aperture: Power Density at Reflector Surface, (Ws) (4 (P) / Sa) 1.77 W/m**2 0 .18 mW/cm**2 6. Region between Reflector and Ground Assuming uniform illumination of the reflector surface, the power density between the antenna and ground can be calculated as follows: Power density between Reflector and Ground, (Wg) (P / Sa) 0 .44 W/m**2 0 .04 mW/com**2

Table 1 Summary of Expected Radiation Levels Based on (5 mW/cem**2) MPE for Controlled Environment Calculated Maximum Region Radiation Level (mW/cm**2) Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field, (Rf)= 164.2 m 0 .03 SATISFIES ANSI 2. Near Field, (Rn)= 68.40 m 0 .10 SATISFIES ANSI 3. Transition Region, (Rt) 0 .10 SATISFIES ANSI Rn < Rt < Rf 4. Between Reflector 28 .22 POTENTIAL HAZARD and feed 5. Reflector Surface 0 .18 SATISFIES ANSI 6. Between Antenna 0 .04 SATISFIES ANSI and Ground It is the applicants responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not exposed to harmful levels of radiation.

Table 2 Summary of Expected Radiation Levels Based on (1 mW/cm**2) MPE for Uncontrolled Environment Calculated Maximum Region Radiation Level (mW/om**2) Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field, (Rf)= 164.2 m 0 .03 SATISFIES ANSI 2. Near Field, (Rn)= 68.40 m 0 .10 SATISFIES ANSI 3. Transgition Region, (Rt) 0 .10 SATISFIES ANSI Rn < Rt < Rf 4. Between Reflector 28 .22 POTENTIAL HAZARD and feed 5. Reflector Surface 0 .18 SATISFIES ANSI 6. Between Antenna 0 .04 SATISFIES ANSI and Ground It is the applicants responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not exposed to harmful levels of radiation.

7. Conclusions Based on the above analysis it is concluded that harmful levels of radiation will not exist in regions normally occupied by the public or the earth station‘s operating personnel. The transmitter will be turned off during antenna maintenance so that the ANSI Standard of 5.0 mW/cm**2 will be complied with for those regions with close proximity to the reflector that exceed acceptable levels.

Roof Mount (Side View) 16 Feet (4.9 meters) lora. rings, Colorado Location 1050 Academy Blvd. Address Colorad rin 1P 1 City, County, State, Zip Code 15 Feet AGL (4.6 meters) #1—Andrew Corporation 4.6 meter ESA. #2—Prodelin 2.4 meter Antenna Type and Model Building Ground Elevation (amst) = 6030 feet (1837.9 meters) [AMSL=Above Mean Sea Level, AGL=Above Ground Level] Exhibit 4

Exhibit #5—Explanation of Government Contract as per question #7 of he 442 The satellite terminals described in this application are being used by The Mitre Corporation to conduct satellite communications research for the USAF. The focus of the effort is centered on the applicability of commercial satellite systems to USAF Operations under contract #F19628—99—C—001.


Document Created: 2001-08-21 13:50:58
Document Modified: 2001-08-21 13:50:58
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC