Thales Ka MCT Radiation Hazard

0542-EX-PL-2016 Text Documents

Thales Avionics Inc.

2016-08-25ELS_181242

Radiation Hazard Analysis Thales InFlyt Experience Thales Ka-Band MCT This analysis predicts the radiation levels around a proposed satellite terminal, comprised of one (array) type antenna which will be tested in both mobile, vehicle mounted, and fixed environments. This report is developed in accordance with the prediction methods contained in OET Bulletin No. 65, Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01, pp 26-30. The maximum level of non- ionizing radiation to which employees may be exposed is limited to a power density level of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter (5 mW/cm2) averaged over any 6 minute period in a controlled environment and the maximum level of non-ionizing radiation to which the general public is exposed is limited to a power density level of 1 milliwatt per square centimeter (1 mW/cm2) averaged over any 30 minute period in an uncontrolled environment. Note that the worse-case radiation hazards exist along the beam axis. Under normal circumstances, it is highly unlikely that the antenna axis will be aligned with any occupied area since that would represent a blockage to the desired signals, thus rendering the link unusable. Satellite Terminal Technical Parameter Table Antenna Actual Diameter 0.4 meters Antenna Surface Area 0.1 sq. meters Antenna Isotropic Gain 38.4 dBi Number of Identical Adjacent Antennas 1 Nominal Antenna Efficiency (ε) 45.00% Nominal Frequency 29.5 GHz Nominal Wavelength (λ) 0.0102 meters Maximum Transmit Power / Carrier 11.5 Watts Number of Carriers 1 Total Transmit Power 11.5 Watts W/G Loss from Transmitter to Feed 4.0 dB Total Feed Input Power 4.58 Watts Near Field Limit Rnf = D²/4λ =3.93 meters Far Field Limit Rff = 0.6 D²/λ = 9.44 meters Transition Region Rnf to Rff In the following sections, the power density in the above regions, as well as other critically important areas will be calculated and evaluated. The calculations are done in the order discussed in OET Bulletin 65. 1.0 At the Antenna Surface The power density at the reflector surface can be calculated from the expression: PDrefl = 4P/A = 14.579 mW/cm² (1) Where: P = total power at feed, milliwatts A = Total area of reflector, sq. cm In the normal range of transmit powers for satellite antennas, the power densities at or around the reflector surface is expected to exceed safe levels. This area will not be accessible to the general 1

public. Operators and technicians shall receive training specifying this area as a high exposure area. Procedures will be established that will assure that all transmitters are rerouted or turned off before access by maintenance personnel to this area is possible. 2.0 On-Axis Near Field Region The geometrical limits of the radiated power in the near field approximate a cylindrical volume with a diameter equal to that of the antenna. In the near field, the power density is neither uniform nor does its value vary uniformly with distance from the antenna. For the purpose of considering radiation hazard it is assumed that the on-axis flux density is at its maximum value throughout the length of this region. The length of this region, i.e., the distance from the antenna to the end of the near field, is computed as Rnf above. The maximum power density in the near field is given by: PDnf = (16ε P)/(π D²) = 5.209 mW/cm² (2) from 0 to 3.93 meters Evaluation Uncontrolled Environment: Does Not Meet Uncontrolled Limits Controlled Environment: Does Not Meet Controlled Limits 3.0 On-Axis Transition Region The transition region is located between the near and far field regions. As stated in Bulletin 65, the power density begins to vary inversely with distance in the transition region. The maximum power density in the transition region will not exceed that calculated for the near field region, and the transition region begins at that value. The maximum value for a given distance within the transition region may be computed for the point of interest according to: PDt = (PDnf)(Rnf)/R = dependent on R (3) where: PDnf = near field power density Rnf = near field distance R = distance to point of interest For: 3.93 < R < 9.4 meters We use Eq (3) to determine the safe on-axis distances required for the two occupancy conditions: Evaluation Uncontrolled Environment Safe Operating Distance,(meters), Rsafeu: 20.5 Controlled Environment Safe Operating Distance,(meters), Rsafec: 4.1 4.0 On-Axis Far-Field Region The on- axis power density in the far field region (PDff) varies inversely with the square of the distance as follows: PDff = PG/(4πR²) = dependent on R (4) where: P = total power at feed 2

G = Numeric Antenna gain in the direction of interest relative to isotropic radiator R = distance to the point of interest For: R > Rff = 9.4 meters PDff = 2.231 mW/cm² at Rff 5.0 Off-Axis Levels at the Far Field Limit and Beyond In the far field region, the power is distributed in a pattern of maxima and minima (sidelobes) as a function of the off-axis angle between the antenna center line and the point of interest. Off-axis power density in the far field can be estimated using the antenna radiation patterns prescribed for the antenna in use. Usually this will correspond to the antenna gain pattern envelope defined by the FCC or the ITU, which takes the form of: Goff = 32 - 25log(Θ) for Θ from 1 to 48 degrees; -10 dBi from 48 to 180 degrees (Applicable for commonly used satellite transmit antennas) Considering that satellite antenna beams are aimed skyward, power density in the far field will usually not be a problem except at low look angles. In these cases, the off axis gain reduction may be used to further reduce the power density levels. For example: At one (1) degree off axis At the far-field limit, we can calculate the power density as: Goff = 32 - 25log(1) = 32 - 0 dBi = 1585 numeric PD1 deg off-axis = PDffx 1585/G = 0.5147 mW/cm² (5) 6.0 Off-Axis power density in the Near Field and Transitional Regions According to Bulletin 65, off-axis calculations in the near field may be performed as follows: assuming that the point of interest is at least one antenna diameter removed from the center of the main beam, the power density at that point is at least a factor of 100 (20 dB) less than the value calculated for the equivalent on-axis power density in the main beam. Therefore, for regions at least D meters away from the center line of the dish, whether behind, below, or in front under of the antenna's main beam, the power density exposure is at least 20 dB below the main beam level as follows: PDnf(off-axis) = PDnf /100 = 0.05209 mW/cm² at D off axis (6) See Section 8 for the calculation of the distance vs. elevation angle required to achieve this rule for a given object height. 7.0 Evaluation of Safe Occupancy Area in Front of Antenna The distance (S) from a vertical axis passing through the dish center to a safe off axis location in front of the antenna can be determined based on the dish diameter rule (Item 6.0). Assuming a flat terrain in front of the antenna, the relationship is: 3

S = (D/ sin α) + (2h - D - 2)/(2 tan α) (7) Where: α = minimum elevation angle of antenna D = dish diameter in meters h = maximum height of object to be cleared, meters For distances equal or greater than determined by equation (7), the radiation hazard will be below safe levels. For D= 0.4 meters h= 2.0 meters Then: α S 10 1.2 meters 15 0.8meters 20 0.6 meters 25 0.5 meters 30 0.41 meters The operational area proposed for the experimental testing of this terminal will not involve antenna elevation angles less than 35 degrees, so the minimum separation distance between the in motion terminal and the general public is 0.41 meters (1.35 feet). When in motion the operation of the vehicle will preclude harmful interference in an uncontrolled environment by maintain the appropriate safe distance. When not in motion and testing the area will be operated in an area not accessible to the general public and all operating personnel will be aware of the minimum safe distances. Summary The satellite terminal will be protected from uncontrolled access while in operation. There will also be proper emission warning signs placed and all operating personnel will be aware of the human exposure levels at and around the terminal. The applicant agrees to abide by the conditions specified in Condition 5208 provided below: Condition 5208 - The licensee shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the antenna does not create potential exposure of humans to radiofrequency radiation in excess of the FCC exposure limits defined in 47 CFR 1.1307(b) and 1.1310 wherever such exposures might occur. Measures must be taken to ensure compliance with limits for both occupational/controlled exposure and for general population/uncontrolled exposure, as defined in these rule sections. Compliance can be accomplished in most cases by appropriate restrictions such as fencing. Requirements for restrictions can be determined by predictions based on calculations, modeling or by field measurements. The FCC's OET Bulletin 65 (available on-line at www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety) provides information on predicting exposure levels and on methods for ensuring compliance, including the use of warning and alerting signs and protective equipment for worker. The following table summarizes all of the above calculations: 4

Table Summary of All RadHaz Parameters Thales Ka-Band MCT Parameter Abbr. Units Formula Dish # ESAA MCT Antenna Diameter Df 0.4 meters Antenna Centerline h 2.0 meters Antenna Surface Area Sa 0.1 meters2 (π * Df2 )/ 4 Antenna Ground Elevation GE 0.0 meters Frequency of Operation f 29.5 GHz Wavelength λ 0.0102 meters c/f HPA Output Power PHPA 11.5 watts HPA to Antenna Loss Ltx 4.0 dB (! dB Radome Loss) P = 2.4 watts Transmit Power at Flange P 6.6 dBW 10 * Log(PHPA) - Ltx 4.58 watts Antenna Gain Ges 38.4 dBi 6871.2 n/a PI π 3.1415927 n/a 2 Antenna Aperture Efficiency η 45.00% n/a Ges / (PI * Df /λ) 1. Reflector Surface Region Calculations Reflector Surface Power Density PDas 145.79 W/m2 (16 * P)/(π * D2 ) 2 14.579 mW/cm Does Not Meet Uncontrolled Limits Does Not Meet Controlled Limits 2. On-Axis Near Field Calculations Extent of Near Field Rn 3.93 meters D2 / (4 *λ) 12.90 feet 2 2 Near Field Power Density PDnf 52.09 W/m (16 * η * P )/ (π *D ) 2 5.209 mW/cm Does Not Meet Uncontrolled Limits Does Not Meet Controlled Limits 3. On-Axis Transition Region Calculations 2 Extent of Transition Region (min) Rtr 3.93 meters D / (4 *λ) Extent of Transition Region (min) 12.90 feet Extent of Transition Region (max) Rtr 9.44 meters (0.6 * D2 ) /λ Extent of Transition Region (max) 30.96 feet Worst Case Transition Region Power Density PDtr 52.09 W/m2 (16 *η * P)/ (π * D2 ) 2 5.209 mW/cm Does Not Meet Uncontrolled Limits Does Not Meet Controlled Limits Uncontrolled Environment Safe Operating Distance Rsu 20.5 m =(PDnf)*(Rnf)/Rsu Controlled Environment Safe Operating DistanceRsc 4.1 m =(PDnf)*(Rnf)/Rsc 4. On-Axis Far Field Calculations 2 Distance to the Far Field Region Rf 9.4 meters (0.6 * D ) /λ 30.96 feet 2 2 On-Axis Power Density in the Far Field PDff 22.31 W/m (Ges * P) / (4 * π * Rf ) 2.231 mW/cm2 Does Not Meet Uncontrolled Limits Meets Controlled Limits 5. Off-Axis Levels at the Far Field Limit and Beyond Reflector Surface Power Density PDs 5.147 W/m2 2 (Ges * P) / (4 * π * Rf )*(Goa/Ges) Goa/Ges at example angle θ 1 degree 0.231 Goa = 32 - 25*log(θ) 2 0.5147 mW/cm Meets Controlled Limits 6. Off-axis Power Density in the Near Field and Transitional Regions Calculations Power density 1/100 of Wn for one diameter PDs 2 2 0.5209 W/m ((16 * η * P )/ (π *D ))/100 removed 2 0.05209 mW/cm Meets Controlled Limits 7. Off-Axis Safe Distances from Earth Station S = (D/ sin α) + (2h - D - 2)/(2 tan α) α = minimum elevation angle of antenna 35 deg h = maximum height of object to be cleared, meters 2.0 m GD = Ground Elevation Delta antenna-obstacle 1.0 m elevation angle 10 1.17 m 15 0.80 m 20 0.62 m 25 0.52 m 35 0.41 m Note: Maximum FCC power density limits for 30 GHz is 1 mW/cm2 for general population/uncontrolled exposure as per FCC OE&T Bulletin No. 65, Edition 97-01 August 1997, Appendix A page 67. 5


Document Created: 2016-08-16 17:13:20
Document Modified: 2016-08-16 17:13:20
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC