Ex B

0504-EX-PL-2011 Text Documents

Tachyon Networks Incorporated

2011-10-06ELS_119895

      Exhibit B
Radiation Hazard Study




          1


1.0     Introduction

The antenna under assessment is a 0.4572 meter (18 inch) parabolic, Ku-band, steerable
earth station dish, installed on the top of the fueslage of the aircraft. For a typical aircraft,
the Airborne Earth Station (“AES”) will be switched on at the same time that the cabin
power busses are powered on. The system may transmit while the aircraft is on the
ground in addition to normal operation in flight. Therefore, RF radiation may sometimes
be present while passengers and crew are occupying or boarding the aircraft or when a
ground crew is servicing the aircraft.

This antenna has a nominal elevation range of +5° to +85°, and mechanical stops prevent
it from being steered below +5 degrees. The power levels are relatively low, so the
hazardous region is relatively small and can be described with a straightforward analysis.

2.0     Governing Limits

The FCC’s Office of Engineering Technology’s Bulletin No. 65 specifies that there are
two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependant upon the situation in which the
exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to the exposure.
The two tiers are General Population / Uncontrolled environment, and an Occupational /
Controlled environment.

The applicable exposure limit for the General Population / Uncontrolled environment,
i.e., areas that people may enter freely, at this frequency of operation is 1 mW/cm2
average power density over a 30 minute period.

The applicable exposure limit for the Occupational / Controlled environment, i.e., areas
that only authorized / trained personnel have access to, at this frequency of operation is 5
mW/cm2 average power density over a 6 minute period.

3.0     Summary Results

Figure 3-1 shows the on-axis power density as a function of range when the system is
transmitting at its maximum output power. This Figure also identifies the various regions
and power levels of concern.




                                                2


Figure 3-1. Power Density as a Function of Distance

Figure 3-2 relates the ranges in Figure 3-1 to an actual installation on a small aircraft. The
outer contour marks the boundary between the safe and potentially hazardous regions of
the uncontrolled environment; note that it does not impinge upon occupied space on the
ground or on the aircraft. The inner contour marks the boundary of the potentially
hazardous region of the Controlled environment. Note that these regions are only
hazardous when the system is transmitting, which it does intermittently, depending on
usage.

                                                                                      14 ft 4 in / 4.37 m

                                                                                      ! ft 1 in / 4 m
                                                                                      13


                                                                                      !
                                                                                      9 ft 10 in / 3 m

                                                                                      !
                                                                                      6 ft 7 in / 2 m

                                                                                      !
                                                                                      3 ft 3 in / 1 m


                                                                                      !
                                                                                      0 ft 0 in / 0 m

                                                                                      !
Figure 3-2. Aircraft Configuration

                                                                                  !
3.1    Summary of expected radiation levels for an Uncontrolled Environment

The table below summarizes the ranges and power densities associated with the
uncontrolled environment.



                                              3


Region                         Maximum Power Density           Hazard Assessment
Safe Region = 17.88 meter      1.0 mW/cm2                      Satisfies FCC MPE
Far Field (Rff) = 6 meter      8.982 mW/cm2                    Potential Hazard
Tansition Region (Rt) =        23.410 mW/cm2                   Potential Hazard
Rnf < Rt < Rff
Near Rield (Rnf) = 2.49        23.410 mW/cm2                   Potential Hazard
meter
Main Reflector Surface         39.017 mW/cm2                   Potential Hazard
Ssurface

It is understood that the power density level in the area between the feed and the reflector
surface is greater than at the reflector surface and is assumed to be a potential hazard.

3.2    Summary of expected radiation levels for an controlled Environment

The table below summarizes the ranges and power densities associated with the
controlled environment.

Region                         Maximum Power Density           Hazard Assessment
Safe Region = 8 meter          5.0 mW/cm2                      Satisfies FCC MPE
Far Field (Rff) = 6 meter      8.982 mW/cm2                    Potential Hazard
Tansition Region (Rt) =        23.390 mW/cm2                   Potential Hazard
Rnf < Rt < Rff
Near Rield (Rnf) = 2.49        23.390 mW/cm2                   Potential Hazard
meter
Main Reflector Surface         39.017 mW/cm2                   Potential Hazard
Ssurface

It is understood that the power density level in the area between the feed and the reflector
surface is greater than at the reflector surface and is assumed to be a potential hazard.

3.3   Conclusions

The proposed earth station system will be located in an aircraft fuselage mount
environment with controlled access during stationary testing and will be serviced by
trained personnel. Based on the above analysis it is concluded that while harmful
radiation levels will not exist in regions normally occupied by test personnel, there do
exist small regions where a potential hazard exists for test personnel, which will be
avoided through training.

4.0    Analysis

4.1    Definition of Terms

                       Antenna diameter (D) = 0.4572 meters



                                             4


                       Wavelength (λ) = 0.0214 meters at 14.0 GHZ

                       Amplifier Power (P) = 16 Watts rated max at tha antenna flange

                       0.4572 meter Antenna Grain (G) = 34 dBi = 2511.9 at 14.0 Ghz

                       0.4572 meter Antenna Efficiency (η1) = 0.6 (60% efficient)



4.2    Region Definition

The area of interest is broken up into three regions: near field, far field and a transition
region. The limit of the near field (Rnf) and the beginning of the far field (Rff) are
calculated as follows.
               Near Field Extent

                       Rnf = D2
                             4λ

                       Rnf =        (0.4572 m)2 = 2.49 m
                                   (4)(0.0214 m)

               Far Field Extent

                       Rff = 0.6D2
                                λ

                       Rff = (0.6)(0.4572 m)2      = 6m
                                   0.0214 m

For the 0.4572 meter antenna, the region between 2.49 m and 6 m is designated as the
transition region.


4.3    Field Strength

4.3.1 Near Field Region

The On Axis Near Field Strength is calculated as follows:


       Snf = 16ηP
              πD2




                                               5


         Snf = (16)(0.60)(16W)
                   (3.14)(0.4572m)2

         Snf = 233.9 W/m2 = 23.39 mW/cm2


4.3.2      Transition Region

The On Axis Field Strength in the transition region is calculated as follows:

         St = SnfRnf
                R

The maximum field strength in the transition region is when R = Rnf at which point the
field strength is Snf = 23.39 mW/cm2.


4.3.3 Far Field Region

The on axis field strength in the far field region is calculated as follows:

         Sff = PG
              4πR2

         Sff = (16W)( 2511.9)
                (4)(3.14)(6 m)2


         Sff = 89.66 W/m2 = 8.966 mW/cm2


4.4 Safe Region for Uncontrolled Access

As given above, the power density in the far field region of the antenna pattern decreases
inversely as the square of the distance. The distance to the point where the power density
equals the 1 mW/cm2 level can be determined by the equation:

R1 mW = ((P * G) / (4 * π * 1 mW/cm2 * 10))0.5
        = ((16 W * 2511.9) / (125.66 mW/cm2) )0.5
        = 17.88 m

4.5 Safe Region for Controlled Access

As given above, the power density in the far field region of the antenna pattern decreases



                                              6


inversely as the square of the distance. The distance to the point where the power density
equals the 5 mW/cm2 level can be determined by the equation:

R5 mW =((P * G) / (4 * π * 5 mW/cm2 * 10))0.5
       = ((16 W * 2511.9) / (628.3 mW/cm2) )0.5
       =8m




                                            7



Document Created: 1100-12-31 00:00:00
Document Modified: 1100-12-31 00:00:00

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC