RADA Technologies LLC

0283-EX-ST-2020

Status: Pending


2020-02-18

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
Site informationText Documents2020-02-18
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Mar 3 2020]Correspondence2020-03-03
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  RADA Technologies LLC

Address
Attention: David Gesswein
Street Address: 20511 Seneca Meadows Parkway, Suite 100
P.O. Box:
City: Germantown
State: MD
Zip Code: 20876
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Gesswein
First Name: David
Title: Senior Principal Engineer
Phone Number: 3012214889

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
For operation of a radar in a counter unmanned aerial system (CUAS) at SFO airport and at test site for integration testing. Radar doesnt have other FCC license to cover operation in these areas.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  Operation at a test site for system integration and operation at SFO airport in a CUAS system.

Information
Callsign: WQ9XDT
Class of Station: MO
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 03/02/2020
Operation End Date: 08/31/2020

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
RADA Electronic Industries RPS-82 1 Yes

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): David Gesswein
Title of Applicant (if any): Senior Principal Engineer
Date: 2020-02-17 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
San Francisco California North  37  36  54 West  122  22  17 San Francisco, CA. SFO airport and adjacent area. 4.50
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 3.30000000-3.40000000 GHz MO 1.090000 kW 271.410000 kW P 0.00001000 % 3M18P0N Pulse
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 3.30000000-3.40000000 GHz MO 1.090000 kW 271.410000 kW P 0.00001000 % 3M97P0N Pulse
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 3.30000000-3.40000000 GHz MO 1.090000 kW 271.410000 kW P 0.00001000 % 7M95P0N Pulse
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 3.30000000-3.40000000 GHz MO 1.090000 kW 271.410000 kW P 0.00001000 % 15M9Q1N Barker-5
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 3.30000000-3.40000000 GHz MO 1.090000 kW 271.410000 kW P 0.00001000 % 6M36Q1N Barker-13

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Castro Valley California North  37  41  50 West  122  1  9 Castro Valley, CA 2.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 3.30000000-3.40000000 GHz MO 1.090000 kW 271.410000 kW P 0.00001000 % 3M18P0N Pulse
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 3.30000000-3.40000000 GHz MO 1.090000 kW 271.410000 kW P 0.00001000 % 3M97P0N Pulse
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 3.30000000-3.40000000 GHz MO 1.090000 kW 271.410000 kW P 0.00001000 % 7M95P0N Pulse
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 3.30000000-3.40000000 GHz MO 1.090000 kW 271.410000 kW P 0.00001000 % 15M9Q1N Barker-5
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 3.30000000-3.40000000 GHz MO 1.090000 kW 271.410000 kW P 0.00001000 % 6M36Q1N Barker-13

31328

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC