Q-Wireless, LLC

0606-EX-ST-2016

Status: Grant Expired Due to New License

WI9XDP
2016-04-28

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
E-Mail generated [Apr 27 2016]Correspondence2016-04-27
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Apr 29 2016]Correspondence2016-05-02
Runcom BST AntennaText Documents2016-04-26
Runcom CPE AntennaText Documents2016-04-26
Runcom BST AntennaText Documents2016-04-26
Runcom CPE AntennaText Documents2016-04-26
Runcom CPE Antenna SpecsText Documents2016-04-26
E-Mail generated [Apr 27 2016]Correspondence2016-04-27
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Apr 29 2016]Correspondence2016-05-02
Runcom BST AntennaText Documents2016-04-26
Runcom CPE AntennaText Documents2016-04-26
Runcom BST AntennaText Documents2016-04-26
Runcom CPE AntennaText Documents2016-04-26
Runcom CPE Antenna SpecsText Documents2016-04-26
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  Q-Wireless, LLC

Address
Attention: Phil Lambert
Street Address: 4631 Ohara Drive
P.O. Box:
City: Evansville
State: IN
Zip Code: 47711
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Nicholas
First Name: Chad
Title: Network Engineer
Phone Number: 812.759.7803

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
We desire to evaluate customer premise equipment (CPE) in the FCC unlicensed TVWS band using Runcom Technologies equipment that the CPE is pending FCC certification. Our original experiment conducted in 2015 was an evaluation of the Base Station which has since been FCC approved. Note; the BST is not presently reporting to Spectrum Bridge and a National Data Base.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  To validate performance of Runcom Technologies, LTD TVWS customer premise equipment (CPE) in terms of connectivity to the base station (BST), performance and scalability. We will deploy 30 CPE at customer locations. These locations will be various sites surrounding the BST at multiple azimuths all pointed back to BST sites. The purpose is to validate performance of Runcom Technologies TVWS equipment both to FCC compliance and to performance criteria. If successful, the next steps will be for Runcom to obtain FCC approval on the equipment.

Information
Callsign: WI9XDP
Class of Station: FX MO
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 05/01/2016
Operation End Date: 10/30/2016

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Runcom Technologies, LTD. RNU4000BTS-500M 2 Yes
Runcom Technologies, LTD. RNU4000BTS-500M 2 Yes
Runcom Technologies, LTD AirStream 4000 30 Yes

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Phil Lambert
Title of Applicant (if any): as General Manager
Date: 2016-04-26 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Olaton Kentucky North  37  31  35 West  86  42  20 10.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   90.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:   90.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:   8.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:   40.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:   211.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:   47.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft: Each antenna is a 90 degree sector. Four antennas are located on the rail of the Olaton water tank at 90, 180, 270, 360 azimuths
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 470.00000000-608.00000000 MHz FX 250.000000 mW 2.430000 W P 6M00D1D QAM
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 614.00000000-698.00000000 MHz FX 250.000000 mW 2.430000 W P 6M00D1D QAM

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Kentucky North  37  31  35 West  86  42  20 20Km radius from BST at water tank 20.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   90.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:   360.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:   8.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 512.00000000-608.00000000 MHz MO 250.000000 mW 61.000000 mW P 6M00D1D QAM
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 614.00000000-698.00000000 MHz MO 250.000000 mW 61.000000 mW P 6M00D1D QAM

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Olaton Kentucky North  37  31  35 West  86  42  20 10.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   90.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:   180.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:   8.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:   40.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:   211.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:   47.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft: Each antenna is a 90 degree sector. Four antennas are located on the rail of the Olaton water tank at 90, 180, 270, 360 azimuths
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 470.00000000-608.00000000 MHz FX 250.000000 mW 2.430000 W P 6M00D1D QAM
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 614.00000000-698.00000000 MHz FX 250.000000 mW 2.430000 W P 6M00D1D QAM

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Olaton Kentucky North  37  31  35 West  86  42  20 10.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   90.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:   270.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:   8.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:   40.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:   211.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:   47.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft: Each antenna is a 90 degree sector. Four antennas are located on the rail of the Olaton water tank at 90, 180, 270, 360 azimuths
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 470.00000000-608.00000000 MHz FX 250.000000 mW 2.430000 W P 6M00D1D QAM
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 614.00000000-698.00000000 MHz FX 250.000000 mW 2.430000 W P 6M00D1D QAM

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Olaton Kentucky North  37  31  35 West  86  42  20 10.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   90.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:   360.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:   8.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:   40.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:   211.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:   47.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft: Each antenna is a 90 degree sector. Four antennas are located on the rail of the Olaton water tank at 90, 180, 270, 360 azimuths
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 470.00000000-608.00000000 MHz FX 250.000000 mW 2.430000 W P 6M00D1D QAM
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 614.00000000-698.00000000 MHz FX 250.000000 mW 2.430000 W P 6M00D1D QAM

43776

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC