Toggle navigation
FCC.report
IBFS
ELS
FCC ID
Contact
About
FCC.report
›
ELS
›
Parallel Wireless, Inc.
›
0029-EX-ST-2017
Parallel Wireless, Inc.
0029-EX-ST-2017
Status: Denied/Dismissed
2017-03-02
Documents and Communications:
[
refresh
]
Description
Category
Date
Dismissal Without Prejudice generated [Mar 2 2017]
Correspondence
2017-03-02
Dismiss E-mail Notification generated [Mar 2 2017]
Correspondence
2017-03-02
Specimen
Images
2017-01-20
Antenna Drawings
Images
2017-01-20
Dismissal Without Prejudice generated [Mar 2 2017]
Post Grant Documents
2017-03-07
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY
Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:
Parallel Wireless, Inc.
Address
Attention:
Bijan Razzaghi
Street Address:
One Tara Boulevard, Suite 404
P.O. Box:
City:
Nashua
State:
NH
Zip Code:
03062
Country:
E-Mail Address:
[email protected]
Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:
Last Name:
Kropper
First Name:
Steve
Title:
VP of Business Development
Phone Number:
603-589-9937
Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
Parallel Wireless, Inc., is an innovative company developing next-generation 3G, 4G, and 5G radio access networks. This application is for a network trial at multiple locations in northern New Hampshire. Parallel Wireless is undertaking this network build out with Wireless Partners, LLC, and will share research results with the Public Safety Communication Research Program (PSCR), with the State of New Hampshire State Interoperability Executive Committee (SIEC), local law enforcement, FirstNet, and cooperating vendors in the public safety broadband market. The Parallel Wireless equipment constitutes LTE eNodeB base stations. The base stations connect to an operator network and provide cellular service. In some cases, service is provided to mobile devices using Wi-Fi. LTE carrier backhaul over Band 4 for areas without Band 14 coverage will be utilized. Testing of the base stations will entail Band 14 capable handsets connecting to the base stations in their typical operating environment. This application is for activities on LTE Band 14.
Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:
The purpose of operation is continued testing of both Parallel Wireless software and hardware. Parallel Wireless hopes to assess performance in real-world RF environments and performance of various UEs (user equipments) with the 4G radios. Deployments of carrier grade LTE networks in the United States are supported by revenue from a massive customer base. In contrast public safety subscribers comprise a core of three million first responders. If the base is broadened, there may be twelve million subscribers including secondary responders like public health personnel, utility disaster recovery workers, and municipal employees, such as school bus drivers. The economics of the public safety broadband network become more sensitive in rural America. Broadening the subscriber base helps, but is not enough to make the economic model for rural coverage viable. Todays carrier architecture for LTE networks is composed entirely of high cost network elements and these elements are all fixed. A viable public safety network is likely to be a hybrid that leverages fixed and mobile elements, while leveraging dedicated Band 14 and public carrier network coverage and enabling inter-opability between legacy LMR and advanced LTE capabilities. The northern New Hampshire network leverages 1) towers broadcasting from three sectors of fixed Band 14 radios, 2) LTE carrier backhaul over Band 4 for areas without Band 14 coverage, and 3) mobile Band 14 units that stand alone and integrate with Band 4 backhaul. This network is designed to prove out the economic and rapid deployment model for rural coverage in New Hampshire. There is no commercial activity or mission-critical telecommunication support being provided as part of this demonstration. Rather, the demonstration is proof-of-concept. We welcome any comments or questions from the Commission, either to Michael Saji, Director, I.P., and Corporate Counsel at
[email protected]
, or to Steve Kropper, VP of Business Development, at
[email protected]
. Comments or questions may also be directed to the Parallel Wireless point of contact at Wireless Partners, LLC, Bob Parsloe, President & CEO, at
[email protected]
.
Information
Callsign:
Class of Station:
FX
Nature of Service:
Experimental
Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date:
03/15/2017
Operation End Date:
09/15/2017
Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:
Manufacturer
Model Number
No. Of Units
Experimental
Parallel Wireless, Inc.
CWS-3050-14
21
No
Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form):
/bijan razzaghi/
Title of Applicant (if any):
IP Counsel
Date:
2017-01-09 00:00:00.0
Station Location
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Errol
New Hampshire
North 44 46 6
West 71 7 25
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
0.01
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
10.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
468.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
4.50
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of utility poles. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Milan
New Hampshire
North 44 34 21
West 71 13 23
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
0.01
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
37.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
525.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
4.80
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of the Milan Fire Tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Clarksville
New Hampshire
North 44 2 29
West 71 24 10
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
0.01
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
19.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
587.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
18.80
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of the a utility pole and buildings. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Groveton
New Hampshire
North 44 37 30
West 71 31 26
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
0.01
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
52.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
570.50
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
29.50
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of a cell tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
North Stratford
New Hampshire
North 44 45 4
West 71 37 21
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
58.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
304.90
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
16.50
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of a cell tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Colebrook
New Hampshire
North 44 53 50
West 71 30 22
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
0.01
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
43.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
308.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
1.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of a cell tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto the existing cell tower or one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Colebrook
New Hampshire
North 44 51 10
West 71 19 4
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
0.01
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
31.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
833.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
14.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of a cell tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Errol
New Hampshire
North 44 46 6
West 71 7 25
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
120.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
10.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
468.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
4.50
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of utility poles. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Errol
New Hampshire
North 44 46 6
West 71 7 25
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
240.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
10.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
468.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
4.50
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of utility poles. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Milan
New Hampshire
North 44 34 21
West 71 13 23
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
120.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
37.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
525.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
4.80
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of the Milan Fire Tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Milan
New Hampshire
North 44 34 21
West 71 13 23
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
240.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
37.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
525.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
4.80
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of the Milan Fire Tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Clarksville
New Hampshire
North 44 2 29
West 71 24 10
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
0.01
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
19.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
587.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
18.80
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of the a utility pole and buildings. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Clarksville
New Hampshire
North 44 2 29
West 71 24 10
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
0.01
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
19.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
587.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
18.80
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of the a utility pole and buildings. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Groveton
New Hampshire
North 44 37 30
West 71 31 26
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
120.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
52.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
570.50
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
29.50
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of a cell tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Groveton
New Hampshire
North 44 37 30
West 71 31 26
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
240.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
52.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
570.50
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
29.50
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of a cell tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
North Stratford
New Hampshire
North 44 45 4
West 71 37 21
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
120.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
58.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
304.90
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
16.50
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of a cell tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
North Stratford
New Hampshire
North 44 45 4
West 71 37 21
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
240.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
58.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
304.90
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
16.50
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of a cell tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Colebrook
New Hampshire
North 44 53 50
West 71 30 22
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
120.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
43.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
308.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
1.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of a cell tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto the existing cell tower or one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Colebrook
New Hampshire
North 44 53 50
West 71 30 22
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
240.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
43.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
308.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
1.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of a cell tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto the existing cell tower or one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Colebrook
New Hampshire
North 44 51 10
West 71 19 4
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
120.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
31.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
833.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
14.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of a cell tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Colebrook
New Hampshire
North 44 51 10
West 71 19 4
17.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
120.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
240.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
6.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
31.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
833.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
14.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The man-made structures surrounding the station location consist of a cell tower. In the opinion of the applicant, none of the man-made structures would create an aeronautical hazard or shield the antenna from an aircraft, because the antenna will be fixed onto one of the existing structures. The antenna will not extend higher than the existing man-made structure.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz
FX
0.010000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz
FX
80.000000 W N/A
P
1.00000000 %
10M0F9W
LTE OFDMA
158267
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC