Toggle navigation
FCC.report
IBFS
ELS
FCC ID
Contact
About
FCC.report
›
ELS
›
Northrop Grumman Defense Mission Systems, Inc.
›
0126-EX-ST-2006
Northrop Grumman Defense Mission Systems, Inc.
0126-EX-ST-2006
Status: Denied/Dismissed
N/A
2006-05-04
Documents and Communications:
[
refresh
]
Description
Category
Date
E-Mail generated [Mar 6 2006]
Correspondence
2006-03-06
Incoming generated [Mar 6 2006]
Correspondence
2006-03-06
Dismissal Without Prejudice generated [May 4 2006]
Correspondence
2006-05-04
Request for STA
Text Documents
2006-03-03
Cancellation Request
Text Documents
2006-05-04
E-Mail generated [Mar 6 2006]
Correspondence
2006-03-06
Incoming generated [Mar 6 2006]
Correspondence
2006-03-06
Dismissal Without Prejudice generated [May 4 2006]
Correspondence
2006-05-04
Request for STA
Text Documents
2006-03-03
Cancellation Request
Text Documents
2006-05-04
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY
Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:
Northrop Grumman Defense Mission Systems, Inc.
Address
Attention:
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP (D. Siddall)
Street Address:
875 15th Street, N.W.
P.O. Box:
City:
Washington
State:
DC
Zip Code:
20005
Country:
E-Mail Address:
[email protected]
Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:
Last Name:
Berrong
First Name:
Fred
Title:
Wireless Technologist V
Phone Number:
(661) 272-7033
Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
See attached Request for STA to operate facilities pending under File No, 0400-EX-PL-2005, as amended.
Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:
Testing of BACN equipment. See attached Request for STA
Information
Callsign:
Class of Station:
FX MO
Nature of Service:
Experimental
Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date:
03/17/2006
Operation End Date:
06/17/2006
Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:
Manufacturer
Model Number
No. Of Units
Experimental
AetherComm
SSPA X-Band
3
Yes
Rozendahl
3
Yes
Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form):
John H. Mullan
Title of Applicant (if any):
Corporate Vice President and secretary
Date:
2006-03-03 00:00:00.0
Station Location
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Melbourne
Florida
North 28 6 0
West 78 40 0
Melbourne (BREVARD), FL, maximum altitude of 13716 meters
33.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
9850.00000000- MHz
FX
N/A 1000.000000 W
P
800KG1D
11.5MB
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
10290.00000000- MHz
MO
N/A 100.000000 W
P
21M4G1D
11.5MB
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Miramar
California
North 32 51 39
West 117 8 41
Marine Corp Air Station Miramar (SAN DIEGO), CA, maximum altitude of 13716 meters
33.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
9850.00000000- MHz
FX
N/A 1000.000000 W
P
800KG1D
11.5MB
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
10290.00000000- MHz
MO
N/A 100.000000 W
P
21M4G1D
11.5MB
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Nellis AFB
Nevada
North 36 14 56
West 114 57 37
Nellis AFB (CLARK), NV, maximum altitude of 13716 meters
33.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
9850.00000000- MHz
FX
N/A 1000.000000 W
P
800KG1D
11.5MB
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
10290.00000000- MHz
MO
N/A 100.000000 W
P
21M4G1D
11.5MB
29065
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC