Navmar Applied Sciences Corporation

0362-EX-ST-2010

Status: Grant Expired Due to New License

WE9XMK
2010-09-02

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
E-Mail generated [Aug 3, 2010]Correspondence2010-08-03
Incoming generated [Sep 1, 2010]Correspondence2010-09-01
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Sep 3, 2010]Correspondence2010-09-03
AFTRCC Coordination DocumentationText Documents2010-09-01
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  Navmar Applied Sciences Corporation

Address
Attention: Ken Lewko
Street Address: 65 W. Street Rd. Bldg C
P.O. Box:
City: Warminster
State: PA
Zip Code: 18974
Country: United States
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Lewko
First Name: Ken
Title: Senior Program Analyst, UAV Group
Phone Number: 215-675-4900 x-225

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
Navmar Applied Sciences Corporation designs, manufactures and tests small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in support of Department of Defense (DOD) requirements. Navmar is coordinating with USAF to conduct test flights of its UAVs in the restricted airspace controlled by the Warren Grove Weapons Range (WGR), located in Warren Grove, NJ. UAVs utilize several frequency bands for command and control by ground station, data transfer and imagery transmission. This STA is requested to ensure operational frequencies used by Navmar UAVs will not interfere with military or non-military users in the area surrounding Warren Grove Weapons Range, NJ.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  Ground and flight testing of small UAVs in support of DoD requirements. This will involve two-way communication between the UAV and ground station to support command and control, data and imagery transfer.

Information
Callsign: WE9XMK
Class of Station: MO
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 09/16/2010
Operation End Date: 03/16/2011

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Microhard Systems, Inc MHX320 2 No
FreeWave Technologies, Inc. P-Series Radio 2 No
Global Microwave Systems, Inc. L1 Band ST 2 No
Microair Avionics T2000UAV-L 1 No

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Kenneth R. Lewko
Title of Applicant (if any): Senior Program Analyst, Navmar
Date: 2010-07-19 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Warren Grove New Jersey North  39  41  54 West  74  23  46 R5002A airspace 14.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 320.00000000- MHz MO 1.000000 W 1.800000 W P 1.50000000 % 300KF1D FM Analog
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 370.00000000- MHz MO 1.000000 W 1.800000 W P 1.50000000 % 300KF1D FM Analog
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1380.00000000-1390.00000000 MHz MO 1.000000 W 1.000000 W P 1.50000000 % 230KF1D GFSK
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1445.00000000-1525.00000000 MHz MO 10.000000 W 10.000000 W P 1.50000000 % 18M0F3F FM Analog Video
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Warren Grove New Jersey North  39  41  54 West  74  23  46 R5002A airspace 14.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 320.00000000- MHz MO 1.000000 W 1.800000 W P 1.50000000 % 300KF1D FM Analog
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 370.00000000- MHz MO 1.000000 W 1.800000 W P 1.50000000 % 300KF1D FM Analog
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1380.00000000-1390.00000000 MHz MO 1.000000 W 1.000000 W P 1.50000000 % 230KF1D GFSK
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1445.00000000-1525.00000000 MHz MO 10.000000 W 10.000000 W P 1.50000000 % 18M0F3F FM Analog Video

30303
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC