Multi-Tech

0120-EX-ST-2021

Status: Pending

N/A
2021-01-28
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  Multi-Tech

Address
Attention: Volodimir Bondarenko
Street Address: 1 Marmac Drive
P.O. Box: L4X 1X3
City: Toronto, Ontario
State:
Zip Code: M9W 1E7
Country: Canada
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Bondarenko
First Name: Volodimir
Title: Manager of Advanced Engineering
Phone Number: (416) 679-5050 x647

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
Device described below includes a cellular communication module manufactured by Quectel, model number BG96. It is a certified by FCC module, under FCC ID XMR201707BG96. The hardware configuration of the device is not meant to go to production, before that, it will go through multiple steps of optimization and redesign to achieve low cost and optimal performance. Therefore, given the fact that the trials are short and involve small number of devices per location ( 1 or 2) and the cellular communication happens 2 times a day, we are looking to get an STA for the marketing trials.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  The Product The Shred Console and Bin monitoring solution envisioned by MultiTech has the potential to revolutionize the B2B Shredding business by making the entire collection process more efficient. Our solution will monitor fill levels in their deployed consoles and bins and provide this data to service companies. Service companies can: • Ensure document security during the collection process • Minimize risk of overfilled containers and unauthorized opening of containers • Schedule just in time pick up • Maximize load and route efficiencies • Provide new competitive service offerings based on real data. • Automatically and digitally document secure pick up and destruction • Access will-call market economically Field Test The field test is a pre-commercialization activity to demonstrate our ability to both effectively monitor console fill levels and automatically document services provided. It is intended to demonstrate the value of the concept to service companies responsible for the collection and disposal of documents following NAID guidelines. The test devices will be installed inside consoles owned by the service companies and located at their customers commercial premises. The devices utilize sensors that measure the level of documents in the consoles and detect when the door is opened for service. The device status (simple and short telemetry) is communicated to the IOT cloud via cellular LTE Cat M1 radio two (2) times a day. An Quectel BG96 module is used to communicate the data. The module has been certified with the FCC. The test devices are powered with an internal battery that will operate for the duration on the filed test but not be user replaceable. The energy in the battery is only enough for the device to operate for about 3-4 months. After that the device will become inoperable and will be removed from the consoles. The test duration will be three (3) months. Test devices will be provided to four (4) selected service companies that have agreed to participate in the test. These companies are located in the Metro NYC region, Dallas, Las Vegas/Phoenix and Sacramento/San Francisco. A total of 500 devices will be deployed in the test as follows: • Legal Shred – Deer Park, NY – 150 units • Secure Shred – Dallas. TX – 100 units • Assured Shred – Las Vegas, NV – 150 units • Viking Shred – Sacramento, CA -100 units The 500-unit test quantity requirement was determined through consultation with these service organizations. In order to determine the benefit of these devices to the service company and their clients, a sufficient number of devices have to be installed at individual locations to observe a measurable benefit in service effectiveness. There are differing service methodologies based on the regional markets. For example, in Las Vegas the service provider has a casino account that is serviced only once the consoles are filled. This currently requires that the service personnel visit the location frequently but only service the bins that are actually full. To test the benefit of this system we need to install sufficient bins at the various locations to measure increased operational efficiency. Service companies often have a goal to fill their shred trucks completely in each service deployment. This is particularly important in major municipal markets like NYC where vehicle operating costs are very expensive. Similarly, other markets have smaller accounts that are dispersed over a wide area. Rather than servicing the account on a fixed schedule significant savings can be obtained by optimizing the service route based on actual fill levels. All these cases require more than a handful of devices to demonstrate the intended benefits. The devices will be inactivated after the completion of the 3-month test. A total of 5 months are envisioned for the test period to allow for installation delays and any troubleshooting that may be required.

Information
Callsign:
Class of Station: MO
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 02/15/2021
Operation End Date: 06/15/2021

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Multitech SWT-037 500 Yes

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Volodimir Bondarenko
Title of Applicant (if any): Manager of Advanced Engineering
Date: 2021-01-28 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Richardson Texas North      West      30 miles in radius
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 699.00000000-716.00000000 MHz MO 200.000000 mW 893.000000 mW P 0.00001200 % 184KG7D as per Quectel BG96
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 699.00000000-716.00000000 MHz MO 200.000000 mW 893.000000 mW P 0.00001200 % 1M08W7D as per Quectel BG96
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1710.00000000-1755.00000000 MHz MO 200.000000 mW 618.000000 mW P 0.00002100 % 1M20G7D as per Quectel BG96
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1710.00000000-1755.00000000 MHz MO 200.000000 mW 618.000000 mW P 0.00002100 % 1M20W7D as per Quectel BG96
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1850.00000000-1910.00000000 MHz MO 200.000000 mW 726.000000 mW P 0.00002100 % 1M20G7D as per Quectel BG96
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1850.00000000-1910.00000000 MHz MO 200.000000 mW 726.000000 mW P 0.00002100 % 1M20W7D as per Quectel BG96

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Deer Park New York North      West      radius of 25 miles from the provided location
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 699.00000000-716.00000000 MHz MO 200.000000 mW 893.000000 mW P 0.00001200 % 1M20G7D as per Quectel BG96
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 699.00000000-716.00000000 MHz MO 200.000000 mW 893.000000 mW P 0.00001200 % 1M20W7D as per Quectel BG96
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1710.00000000-1755.00000000 MHz MO 200.000000 mW 618.000000 mW P 0.00002100 % 1M20G7D as per Quectel BG96
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1710.00000000-1755.00000000 MHz MO 200.000000 mW 618.000000 mW P 0.00002100 % 1M20W7D as per Quectel BG96
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1850.00000000-1910.00000000 MHz MO 200.000000 mW 726.000000 mW P 0.00002100 % 1M20G7D as per Quectel BG96
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1850.00000000-1910.00000000 MHz MO 200.000000 mW 726.000000 mW P 0.00002100 % 1M20W7D as per Quectel BG96

38968

© 2026 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC