Incoming generated [Sep 8 2016]

0048-EX-CN-2016 Correspondence

MC10 Inc.

2016-09-08ELS_181732

From: Stephen Lee To: Behnam Ghaffari Date: September 08, 2016 Subject: FCC File No. 0048-EX-CN-2016 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: Hello Behnam, I have re-typed your questions and have listed my comments below the respective question. 1. Can you lower the number of the requested equipment from 200/100 to 50/50? If not, please justify these numbers. Why can't your testing be done with a limited number of units? [1 Response]: Our device is one-time use and depending on how it is placed on the patient and obtains a signal, the physician may throw the device out and re-apply a new device. We build several units in anticipation of this. So we may build out 5 units but only 1 is placed on a patient and the data read out. We can reduce the requested number to 200 for SA-0500 and 20 for SA-0254 since we have gone through some patients already. 2. We do not accept multiple filings for the same operation. There is a pending experimental STA 1284-EX-ST-2016 filed by MC10 Inc. Which one of these 2 pending applications would you like us to process? The other one would have to be dismissed. [2 Response]: Please process: 0048-EX-CN-2016 (this one) Please dismiss 1284-EX-ST-2016 ***[Additional note]:. I had accidentally not checked the "Confidential" button for one of the attachments I submitted. The first attachment I submitted titled, "See Exhibit A" was not marked confidential but should have been. I had re-attached it titled, "Exhibit A" and marked it confidential. Would you delete "See Exhibit A" as it is supposed to be marked confidential? Thank you.


Document Created: 2016-09-08 10:06:37
Document Modified: 2016-09-08 10:06:37
© 2026 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC