E-Mail generated [Mar 6, 2009]

0086-EX-ST-2009 Correspondence

Intel Corporation

2009-03-06ELS_96633

To: Robert Paxman E-Mail: robert.paxman@intel.com From: Behnam Ghaffari Date: March 06, 2009 Subject: FCC File No. 0086-EX-ST-2009 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: Mr. Paxman, 1. Your application will be coordinated with our bureaus to be reviewed and voted on. In order for them to run their analysis they need to know exactly where this experiment will be conducted and what the radius of operation is. So please provide the radius of operation (in kilometer) from center point of the provided coordinates. 2. There is restriction for the number of equipment and any number greater than 50 devices need a justification. Please submit a statement explaining the reason for utilizing 150 devices vs. 50 devices and answer to the following questions: a) Are you requesting to perform a limited market study? b) If a limited market study is going to be performed, will any fees be charged or will there be any contractual arrangements between Intel Corporation, and the participants in this experiment? c) Will all of the experimental devices be retrieved by Intel Corporation, from the participants upon completion of this experiment? The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information within 30 days of March 06, 2009 may result in application dismissal pursuant to Section 5.67 and forfeiture of the filing fee pursuant to Section 1.1108. DO NOT Reply to this email by using the 'Reply' button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must upload your response via the Internet at https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/els/index.cfm by clicking on the "Reply to Correspondence" hyperlink. Responses to this correspondence must contain the Reference number : 8120


Document Created: 2009-03-06 12:02:53
Document Modified: 2009-03-06 12:02:53
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC